<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.sarg.dev/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=2600%3A1013%3AB016%3A849F%3A643A%3A1FD8%3ABE8B%3A4B3F</id>
	<title>Vero - Wikipedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.sarg.dev/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=2600%3A1013%3AB016%3A849F%3A643A%3A1FD8%3ABE8B%3A4B3F"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.sarg.dev/index.php/Special:Contributions/2600:1013:B016:849F:643A:1FD8:BE8B:4B3F"/>
	<updated>2026-08-14T14:26:28Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.sarg.dev/index.php?title=Stipulative_definition&amp;diff=451651</id>
		<title>Stipulative definition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.sarg.dev/index.php?title=Stipulative_definition&amp;diff=451651"/>
		<updated>2025-08-27T03:20:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;2600:1013:B016:849F:643A:1FD8:BE8B:4B3F: /* On stipulative definitions */Clarified persuasive definition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Short description|Definition for the purpose of discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
A &#039;&#039;&#039;stipulative definition&#039;&#039;&#039; is a type of [[definition]] in which a new or currently existing term is given a new specific meaning for the purposes of [[Logical argument|argument]] or discussion in a given context. When the term already exists, this definition may, but does not necessarily, contradict the [[dictionary]] ([[lexical definition|lexical]]) definition of the term. Because of this, a stipulative definition cannot be &amp;quot;correct&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;incorrect&amp;quot; within its stipulated context; it can only differ from other definitions, but it can be useful for its intended purpose.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://atheism.about.com/od/logicalarguments/a/def_stipulative.htm |title=Stipulative Definitions |last=Cline |first=Austin |work=Atheism.about.com |publisher=[[About.com]] |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120104021753/http://atheism.about.com/od/logicalarguments/a/def_stipulative.htm |archive-date=2012-01-04 |access-date=2017-01-10 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=ConciseIntro&amp;gt;Hurey, Patrick J. &#039;&#039;A Concise Introduction to Logic&#039;&#039;, [[Cengage Learning]], {{ISBN|978-0534089283}} {{full citation needed|date=August 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, in the riddle of [[Inductive reasoning|induction]] by [[Nelson Goodman]], &amp;quot;[[Grue and Bleen|grue]]&amp;quot; was &#039;&#039;stipulated&#039;&#039; to be &amp;quot;a property of an object that makes it appear green if observed before some future time &#039;&#039;t&#039;&#039;, and blue if observed afterward&amp;quot;. &amp;quot;Grue&amp;quot; has no meaning in standard English; therefore, Goodman created the new term and gave it a &#039;&#039;stipulative definition&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==On stipulative definitions==&lt;br /&gt;
Stipulative definitions of existing terms are useful in making theoretical arguments, or stating specific cases. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
*Suppose we say that to love someone is to be willing to die for that person.&lt;br /&gt;
*Take &amp;quot;human&amp;quot; to mean any member of the species &#039;&#039;Homo sapiens&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*For the purposes of argument, we will define a &amp;quot;student&amp;quot; to be &amp;quot;a person under 18 enrolled in a local school&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of these are also [[precising definition]]s, a subtype of stipulative definition that may not contradict but only extend the [[lexical definition]] of a term. [[Theoretical definition]]s, used extensively in [[science]] and philosophy, are similar in some ways to stipulative definitions (although theoretical definitions are somewhat normative,{{Elaborate|date=June 2024}} more like [[persuasive definitions]]).&amp;lt;ref name=ConciseIntro/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many holders of controversial and highly charged opinions use stipulative definitions referred to as [[persuasive definitions]] to attach the emotional or other [[connotation]]s of a word to the meaning they would like to give it; for example, defining &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;the killing of any living thing for any reason&amp;quot;. The other side of such an argument is likely to use a different stipulative definition for the same term: &amp;quot;the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the premeditated killing of a human being&amp;quot;. The lexical definition in such a case is likely to fall somewhere in between.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When a stipulative definition is confused with a lexical definition within an argument there is a risk of [[equivocation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Persuasive definition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Theoretical definition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Defining}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Stipulative Definition}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Definition]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Arguments]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Reasoning]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>2600:1013:B016:849F:643A:1FD8:BE8B:4B3F</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>