<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.sarg.dev/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=2A01%3A36D%3A1200%3A2557%3A48B8%3A27AD%3AFE16%3A5DD7</id>
	<title>Vero - Wikipedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.sarg.dev/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=2A01%3A36D%3A1200%3A2557%3A48B8%3A27AD%3AFE16%3A5DD7"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.sarg.dev/index.php/Special:Contributions/2A01:36D:1200:2557:48B8:27AD:FE16:5DD7"/>
	<updated>2026-08-14T18:49:31Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.sarg.dev/index.php?title=Linguistic_purism_in_English&amp;diff=704842</id>
		<title>Linguistic purism in English</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.sarg.dev/index.php?title=Linguistic_purism_in_English&amp;diff=704842"/>
		<updated>2025-07-03T16:39:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;2A01:36D:1200:2557:48B8:27AD:FE16:5DD7: /* Modern English */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{EngvarB|date=August 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Short description|Efforts to reduce foreign terms in English}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2017}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{English language}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Linguistic purism|Purism in the linguistic field]] is the historical trend of languages to conserve intact their lexical structure of [[word family|word families]], in opposition to foreign influences which are considered &#039;impure&#039;. Historically, &#039;&#039;&#039;linguistic purism in English&#039;&#039;&#039; is a reaction to the great number of [[loanword|borrowings]] in the [[English language]] from other languages, especially [[Old French]], since the [[Norman conquest of England]], and some of its native vocabulary and grammar have been supplanted by features of [[Romance languages|Latinate]] and [[Greek language|Greek]] origin.&amp;lt;ref name=johnson&amp;gt;{{cite news|author=R.L.G.|title=Johnson: What might have been|url=https://www.economist.com/prospero/2014/01/28/johnson-what-might-have-been|newspaper=[[The Economist]]|url-access=subscription|date=28 January 2014|access-date=31 July 2020}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Efforts to remove or consider the removal of foreign terms in English are often known as &#039;&#039;&#039;Anglish&#039;&#039;&#039;, a term coined by author and humorist [[Paul Jennings (British author)|Paul Jennings]] in 1966.&amp;lt;ref name=cambridge&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/anglish-a-brexiteer-s-lingua-franca/|title=Anglish: A Brexiteer&#039;s lingua franca?|last=Bidwell|first=Lili|website=[[The Cambridge Student]]|date=25 March 2017|access-date=25 January 2021}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
English linguistic purism has persisted in diverse forms since the [[inkhorn term]] controversy of the [[early modern period]]. In its mildest form, purism stipulates the use of [[List of Germanic and Latinate equivalents in English|native terms instead of loanwords]]. In stronger forms, new words are coined from [[Germanic languages|Germanic]] roots (such as &#039;&#039;[[wikt:wordstock|wordstock]]&#039;&#039; for &#039;&#039;vocabulary&#039;&#039;) or revived from [[history of English|older stages of English]] (such as &#039;&#039;[[wikt:shrithe|shrithe]]&#039;&#039; for &#039;&#039;proceed&#039;&#039;). Noted purists of [[Early Modern English]] include [[John Cheke]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Cheke|title=Sir John Cheke|access-date=25 January 2021|author=[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Thomas Wilson (rhetorician)|Thomas Wilson]],&amp;lt;ref name=wilson&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.ric.edu/faculty/rpotter/inkhorn.html|title=Texts from the Inkhorn Debate, c. 1560–1640|access-date=25 January 2021|author=[[Rhode Island College]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Ralph Lever]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite journal |last1=Sgarbi |first1=Marco |date=2013 |title=Ralph Lever&#039;s &#039;&#039;Art of Reason, Rightly Termed Witcraft&#039;&#039; (1573) |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/24338444 |journal=Bruniana &amp;amp; Campanelliana |volume=19 |issue=1 |pages=149–163 |jstor=24338444 |access-date=25 January 2021}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Richard Rowlands]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|title=Studien zur englischen Philologie|first1=Lorenz|last1=Morsbach|publisher=Halle a.S., Max Niemeyer|year=1910|page=123|url=https://archive.org/details/studienzurengl4045halluoft/page/n261/mode/2up}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[Nathaniel Fairfax]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite ODNB|url=https://www.oxforddnb.com/view/10.1093/ref:odnb/9780198614128.001.0001/odnb-9780198614128-e-9088|title=Fairfax, Nathaniel|access-date=25 January 2021|author=[[Dictionary of National Biography|Oxford Dictionary of National Biography]]|year=2004|doi=10.1093/ref:odnb/9088|isbn=978-0-19-861412-8}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Modern linguistic purists include [[William Barnes]],&amp;lt;ref name=johnson /&amp;gt; [[Charles Dickens]],&amp;lt;ref name=dickens&amp;gt;{{cite book|last=Lynne|first=Murphy|title=The Prodigal Tongue|year=2018|publisher=[[Penguin Books]]|isbn=978-1524704889|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CPYsDwAAQBAJ}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Gerard Manley Hopkins]],&amp;lt;ref name=hopkins&amp;gt;{{cite journal |last1=Roper |first1=Jonathan |date=April 2012 |title=English Purisms |url=https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/full/10.3366/vic.2012.0059?src=recsys |journal=Victoriographies |publisher=[[Edinburgh University Press]] |volume=2 |issue=1 |pages=44–59 |doi=10.3366/vic.2012.0059 |access-date=25 January 2021|url-access=subscription }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Elias Molee]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|last=Molee|first=Elias|title=Pure Saxon English, Or, Americans to the Front|year=1890|publisher=[[Rand McNally]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Percy Grainger]],&amp;lt;ref name=grainger&amp;gt;{{cite journal |last1=Gillies |first1=M. |date=2019 |title=Percy Grainger: How American was He? |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/nineteenth-century-music-review/article/abs/percy-grainger-how-american-was-he/47EE7729107AA2C3D95F4B3AD6DB443F |journal=Nineteenth-Century Music Review |volume=16 |issue=1 |pages=9–26 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |doi=10.1017/S1479409817000568 |s2cid=187266648 |access-date=25 January 2021|url-access=subscription }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[George Orwell]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Poole&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/jan/17/my-problem-with-george-orwell |title=My problem with George Orwell |last=Poole |first=Steven |date=2013-01-17 |website=[[The Guardian]] |access-date=2021-01-08}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middle English===&lt;br /&gt;
{{see also|Middle English creole hypothesis}}&lt;br /&gt;
English words gave way to borrowings from [[Anglo-Norman language|Anglo-Norman]] following the [[Norman Conquest]] as English lost ground as a language of prestige. Anglo-Norman was used in schools and dominated literature, nobility and higher life, leading a wealth of French loanwords to enter English over the course of several centuries—English only returned to courts of law in 1362, and to government in the following century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|last1=Kay|first1=Christian|last2=Allan|first2=Kathryn|title=English Historical Semantics|chapter=A brief history of the English lexicon|year=2015|publisher=[[Edinburgh University Press]]|isbn=978-0748644773|pages=6–24}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notwithstanding, some texts of early [[Middle English]] engaged in linguistic purism, deliberately avoiding excessive Anglo-Norman influence. [[Layamon&#039;s Brut|Layamon&#039;s &#039;&#039;Brut&#039;&#039;]], composed in the late 12th or early 13th century, espoused several features of Old English poetic style and used a predominantly Anglo-Saxon vocabulary.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Ackerman&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ackerman, Robert W. (1966) &#039;&#039; Backgrounds to Medieval English Literature&#039;&#039;. 1st. New York: Random House, Inc.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;[[Ancrene Wisse]]&#039;&#039;, of the same era, allowed for French and Old Norse loans but maintained conservative spelling and syntax to keep with Old English.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite journal | last=Tolkien | first=J.R.R. |author-link=J.R.R. Tolkien | year=1929 | title=[[Ancrene Wisse and Hali Meiðhad]] | journal= Essays and Studies by Members of the English Association | volume=14 | pages=104–126 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;[[Ayenbite of Inwyt]]&#039;&#039;, a [[Kentish Old English|Kentish]] translation of a French treatise on morality written about a century earlier, used [[calque|calques]] to avoid borrowing from French.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|last=Herman|first=Louis Jay|title=Remorse From Dan Michel to James Joyce|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1989/01/08/opinion/l-remorse-from-dan-michel-to-james-joyce-386189.html|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=8 January 1989|access-date=25 January 2021}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Early Modern English===&lt;br /&gt;
Controversy over [[inkhorn term|inkhorn terms]]—foreign loanwords perceived to be needless—persisted in the 16th and 17th centuries. Among others, [[Thomas Elyot]], a [[neologism|neologiser]], borrowed extensively from abroad in support of &amp;quot;the necessary augmentation&amp;quot; of English.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite journal |last1=Vos |first1=Alvin |date=October 1976 |title=Humanistic Standards of Diction in the Inkhorn Controversy |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4173916 |journal=Studies in Philology |publisher=[[University of North Carolina Press]] |volume=73 |issue=4 |pages=376–396 |jstor=4173916 |access-date=25 January 2021}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Linguistic purists such as [[John Cheke]] opposed this borrowing in favour of keeping English &amp;quot;unmixt and unmangled&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=https://spartacus-educational.com/John_Cheke.htm |title=John Cheke |last=Simkin |first=John|date=September 1997 | website=[[Spartacus Educational]] |access-date=25 January 2021}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Thomas Wilson (rhetorician)|Thomas Wilson]], a contemporary of Cheke, criticised borrowing from foreign languages as seeking an &amp;quot;outlandish English&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=wilson&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Modern English===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:William Barnes poet.jpg|thumb|200px|[[William Barnes]], a 19th-century poet and linguistic purist]]&lt;br /&gt;
With the influx of new industrial and scientific terms from Greek and Latin, linguistic purism saw renewed interest in the 19th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|last1=Langer|first1=Nils|last2=Davies|first2=Winifred|title=Linguistic Purism in the Germanic Languages|year=2005|publisher=[[De Gruyter]]|isbn=3-11-018337-4|pages=103}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; U.S. President [[Thomas Jefferson]] observed in an 1825 letter that &amp;quot;a taste is reviving in England for the recovery of the Anglo-Saxon dialect&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/98-01-02-5648 |title=From Thomas Jefferson to J. Evelyn Denison, 9 November 1825 |publisher=[[National Archives and Records Administration]] |website=founders.archives.gov |access-date=28 January 2021}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Dorset]] poet, minister, and philologist [[William Barnes]] coined several words to promote &amp;quot;strong old Anglo-Saxon speech&amp;quot;, including &#039;&#039;[[wikt:speechcraft|speechcraft]]&#039;&#039; for &#039;&#039;grammar&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[[wikt:birdlore|birdlore]]&#039;&#039; for &#039;&#039;ornithology&#039;&#039;, and &#039;&#039;[[wikt:bendsome|bendsome]]&#039;&#039; for &#039;&#039;flexible&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|last=Barnes|first=Williams|title=An Outline of English Speech-Craft|year=1878|publisher=[[Charles Kegan Paul|C. Kegan Paul &amp;amp; Co.]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Poet [[Gerard Manley Hopkins]] discussed Barnes in an 1882 letter to [[Robert Bridges]], lamenting the &amp;quot;utter hopelessness&amp;quot; of Barnes&#039;s purism but nonetheless writing in support of it, claiming that &amp;quot;no beauty in a language can make up for want of purity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=hopkins /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|title=Linguistic Purism in the Germanic Languages|first1=Nils|last1=Langer|first2=Winifred|last2=Davies|publisher=[[De Gruyter|Walter de Gruyter]]|year=2005|page=328}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Charles Dickens]] emphasised the importance of Germanic elements of English during this period, stressing that a writer should not &amp;quot;seek abroad&amp;quot; for new words.&amp;lt;ref name=dickens /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fifth rule of vocabulary in &#039;&#039;[[The King&#039;s English]]&#039;&#039;, published in 1917, suggests that writers should &amp;quot;prefer the Saxon word to the Romance&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=dickens /&amp;gt; In his 1946 essay &amp;quot;[[Politics and the English Language]]&amp;quot;, [[George Orwell]] criticised the extensive use of &amp;quot;foreign&amp;quot; words in English.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Poole&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; [[Australians|Australian]] composer [[Percy Grainger]], a contemporary of Orwell, invented a &amp;quot;blue-eyed English&amp;quot; that he perceived to be linguistically pure and preferred the use of English words in the place of traditional Italian music terms.&amp;lt;ref name=grainger /&amp;gt; One year after Grainger&#039;s death, philologist [[Lee Hollander]] emphasised in his 1962 translation of the &#039;&#039;[[Poetic Edda]]&#039;&#039;—a collection of [[Old Norse]] poems—that &amp;quot;Germanic material must be drawn upon to the utmost extent ... because of the tang and flavor still residing in the homelier indigenous speech material&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|last=Hollander|first=Lee M.|title=The Poetic Edda|year=1986|publisher=[[University of Texas Press]]|isbn=0292764995|page=xxviii}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Paul Jennings (British author)|Paul Jennings]] coined the term &amp;quot;Anglish&amp;quot; in a three-part series in &#039;&#039;[[Punch magazine|Punch]]&#039;&#039; commemorating the 900th anniversary of the [[Norman conquest of England]].&amp;lt;ref name=cambridge /&amp;gt; Jennings&#039;s articles, entitled &amp;quot;1066 and All Saxon&amp;quot; and published in June 1966, envisioned an England in which the conquest had failed and included linguistically pure English passages; Jennings gave &amp;quot;a bow to [[William Barnes#Linguistic purism|William Barnes]]&amp;quot; as an inspiration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite magazine |last=Jennings |first=Paul |date=June 1966 |title= 1066 and All Saxon |magazine= [[Punch (magazine)|Punch]] |location= London}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1989, [[science fiction]] writer [[Poul Anderson]] released a similarly-written text about basic [[atomic theory]] called &#039;&#039;[[Uncleftish Beholding]]&#039;&#039; composed almost fully of Germanic-rooted words. In 1997, [[Douglas Hofstadter]] jokingly entitled the style &amp;quot;Ander-Saxon&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|last=Hofstadter|first=Douglas R.|title=[[Le Ton beau de Marot]]|year=1997|publisher=[[Basic Books]]|isbn=0465086454}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The September 2009 publication &#039;&#039;How We&#039;d Talk if the English had Won in 1066&#039;&#039; by David Cowley updates Old English words to today&#039;s English spelling, seeking mainstream appeal by covering words in five grades ranging from &amp;quot;easy&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;weird and wonderful&amp;quot; and giving many examples of use with drawings and tests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/how-wed-talk-if-the-english-had-won-in-1066-david-cowley/1137949846|title=How We&#039;d Talk if the English Had Won in 1066: New Edition 2020|website=[[Barnes &amp;amp; Noble]]|access-date=25 January 2021}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Paul Kingsnorth]]&#039;s 2014 &#039;&#039;[[The Wake (novel)|The Wake]]&#039;&#039; is written in a hybrid of [[Old English]] and [[Modern English]] to account for its 1066 milieu,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/apr/02/the-wake-paul-kingsnorth-review-literary-triumph |title=The Wake by Paul Kingsnorth review – &#039;A literary triumph&#039; |last=Thorpe |first=Adam |date=2 April 2014 |website=[[The Guardian]] |access-date=2021-01-08}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Edmund Fairfax&#039;s 2017 satiric literary novel &#039;&#039;Outlaws&#039;&#039; is similarly written in a &amp;quot;constructed&amp;quot; form of English consisting almost exclusively of words of Germanic origin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|last=Fairfax|first=Edmund|title=Outlaws|year=2017|publisher=Bokos|isbn=978-0995296503|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MA03swEACAAJ}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; An online newsletter called &#039;&#039;The Anglish Times&#039;&#039; has regularly reported on current events without non-Germanic borrowed words since January 2021.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=News Written In Anglish |url=https://theanglishtimes.com/ |access-date=2022-11-15 |website=theanglishtimes.com}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Linguistic purism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Word family]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Constrained writing]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Plain English]], a variety of English written specifically for clarity&lt;br /&gt;
* [[List of Germanic and Latinate equivalents in English]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{English nationalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Germanic languages}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{English dialects by continent}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Forms of English]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linguistic purism|English]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:English nationalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Germanic languages]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:History of the English language]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>2A01:36D:1200:2557:48B8:27AD:FE16:5DD7</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>