<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.sarg.dev/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=87.90.80.199</id>
	<title>Vero - Wikipedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.sarg.dev/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=87.90.80.199"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.sarg.dev/index.php/Special:Contributions/87.90.80.199"/>
	<updated>2026-07-12T18:26:32Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.sarg.dev/index.php?title=Fidelity&amp;diff=365801</id>
		<title>Fidelity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.sarg.dev/index.php?title=Fidelity&amp;diff=365801"/>
		<updated>2025-07-24T13:26:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;87.90.80.199: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Short description|Quality of faithfulness or loyalty to another person or group}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Other uses}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Unfocused|date=March 2023}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:4243 - Venezia - Palazzo ducale - Capitello 28 - In fidelitate nullli gero - Foto Giovanni Dall&#039;Orto, 30-Jul-2008.jpg|thumb|right|220px|[[Doge&#039;s Palace, Venice|Palazzo Ducale in Venice]]: [[:commons:Category:Capitals in the Doge&#039;s Palace (Venice) - 28|capital # 28]] in the porch, featuring Virtues and vices — &#039;&#039;&#039;In fidelitate nulli gero&#039;&#039;&#039; (Fidelity)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Fidelity&#039;&#039;&#039; is the quality of [[faithfulness]] or [[loyalty]]. Its original meaning regarded [[duty]] in a broader sense than the related concept of &#039;&#039;[[fealty]]&#039;&#039;. Both derive from the [[Latin]] word {{lang|la|fidēlis}}, meaning &amp;quot;faithful or loyal&amp;quot;. In the [[City of London]] financial markets it has traditionally been used in the sense encompassed in the motto &amp;quot;my word is my bond&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== In moral philosophy ==&lt;br /&gt;
In moral philosophy, fidelity refers to a person who keeps agreements. Strong fidelity refers to a person who keeps agreements even if not mutually beneficial to the other person. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite journal |last=Kuhn |first=Steven T. |date=1996 |title=Agreement Keeping and Indirect Moral Theory |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2940872 |journal=The Journal of Philosophy |volume=93 |issue=3 |pages=105–128 |doi=10.2307/2940872 |issn=0022-362X|url-access=subscription }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;lofi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; Audio and electronics==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Sound recording and reproduction}}&lt;br /&gt;
In audio, &amp;quot;fidelity&amp;quot; denotes how accurately a copy reproduces its source.  In the 1950s, the terms &amp;quot;[[high fidelity]]&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;hi-fi&amp;quot; were popularized for equipment and recordings which exhibited more accurate [[sound reproduction]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book |last1=Hartley |first1=H. A. |title=Audio Design Handbook |url=http://www.tech-systems-labs.com/books/hartley.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090127021505/http://www.tech-systems-labs.com/books/hartley.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-date=2009-01-27 |format=PDF |access-date=2009-08-08 |year=1958 |publisher=Gernsback Library |location=New York, New York |id=[[Library of Congress]] Catalog Card No. 57-9007 |pages=7, 20}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For example, a worn [[gramophone record]] will have a lower fidelity than one in good condition, and a recording made by a low budget record company in the early 20th century is likely to have significantly less audio fidelity than a good modern recording.{{Citation needed|date=January 2020}}  Similarly in [[electronics]], fidelity refers to the correspondence of the output signal to the input signal, rather than sound quality, as in the popular internet connection technology &amp;quot;[[Wi-Fi]]&amp;quot;.{{Citation needed|date=January 2020}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;[[Lo-fi music|lo-fi]]&amp;quot; has existed since at least the 1950s, shortly after the acceptance of &amp;quot;hi-fi&amp;quot;, but its definition evolved continuously between the 1970s and 2000s. In the 1976 edition of the &#039;&#039;Oxford Dictionary&#039;&#039;,{{clarify|reason=Oxford University Press publishes many dictionaries. Which one?|date=June 2020}} lo-fi was added under the definition of &amp;quot;sound production less good in quality than &#039;[[hi-fi]]&#039;&amp;quot;, and in the glossary of the 1977 book &#039;&#039;The Tuning of the World&#039;&#039;, was defined as &amp;quot;unfavourable signal-to-noise ratio&amp;quot;. In 2003, the &#039;&#039;Oxford Dictionary&#039;&#039; added a second definition: &amp;quot;A genre of rock music characterized by minimal production, giving a raw and unsophisticated sound.&amp;quot; A third was added in 2008: &amp;quot;Unpolished, amateurish, or technologically unsophisticated, esp. as a deliberate aesthetic choice.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite thesis |last= Harper|first=Adam |date=2014 |title=Lo-Fi Aesthetics in Popular Music Discourse |type=PDF |publisher= [[Wadham College]]|url=https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:cc84039c-3d30-484e-84b4-8535ba4a54f8/datastreams/THESIS01 |access-date=March 10, 2018|pp=7–11}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;scimodsim&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; Scientific modelling and simulation==&lt;br /&gt;
In the fields of [[scientific modelling]] and [[simulation]], fidelity refers to the degree to which a model or simulation reproduces the state and behaviour of a real world object, feature or condition.  Fidelity is therefore a measure of the realism of a model or simulation.&amp;lt;ref name=SISO/&amp;gt;  Simulation fidelity has also been described in the past as &amp;quot;degree of similarity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=HaysSinger/&amp;gt; In quantum mechanics and optics,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite journal|last=Bowman|first=D.|last2=Harte|first2=T. L.|last3=Chardonnet|first3=V.|last4=Groot|first4=C. De|last5=Denny|first5=S. J.|last6=Goc|first6=G. Le|last7=Anderson|first7=M.|last8=Ireland|first8=P.|last9=Cassettari|first9=D.|date=2017-05-15|title=High-fidelity phase and amplitude control of phase-only computer generated holograms using conjugate gradient minimisation|url=https://www.osapublishing.org/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-25-10-11692|journal=Optics Express|language=EN|volume=25|issue=10|pages=11692–11700|arxiv=1701.08620|doi=10.1364/OE.25.011692|issn=1094-4087|bibcode=2017OExpr..2511692B|pmid=28788742}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the fidelity of a field is calculated as an [[Orbital overlap|overlap integral]] of the field of interest with a reference or target field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Program evaluation==&lt;br /&gt;
In the field of [[program evaluation]], the term fidelity denotes how closely a set of procedures were implemented as they were supposed to have been. For example, it is difficult to draw conclusions from a study about formative assessment in school classrooms if the teachers are not able or willing to follow the procedures they received in training.&amp;lt;ref name=ODonnell/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Translation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Translation#Fidelity and transparency}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[translation]], &#039;&#039;fidelity&#039;&#039; is the extent to which a translation accurately renders the [[Meaning (linguistics)|meaning]] of the source text, without distortion. It is contrasted with &#039;&#039;transparency&#039;&#039;, which is the extent to which a translation appears to a native speaker of the target language to have originally been written in that language.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikiquote}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{annotated link|[[Classism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Erik Erikson#Erikson&#039;s theory of personality|Erikson&#039;s theory of personality]] – Erikson&#039;s fidelity is the ability to commit to others and acceptance of others&lt;br /&gt;
*{{annotated link|[[Infidelity]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{annotated link|[[Knighthood]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{annotated link|[[Monasticism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{annotated link|[[Rankism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|refs=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=SISO&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://www.sisostds.org/ProductsPublications/ReferenceDocuments.aspx |title=SISO-REF-002-1999: Fidelity Implementation Study Group Report |publisher=Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization |year=1999 |access-date=January 2, 2015}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=HaysSinger&amp;gt;{{cite book |author=Hays, R. T. |author2=Singer, M. J. |title=Simulation fidelity in training system design: Bridging the gap between reality and training |publisher=Springer-Verlag |year=1989}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=ODonnell&amp;gt;{{cite journal |title=Defining, Conceptualizing, and Measuring Fidelity of Implementation and Its Relationship to Outcomes in K–12 Curriculum Intervention Research |last=O&#039;Donnell |first= Carol L.|year=2008 |journal=Review of Educational Research |volume=78 |issue=1 |pages=33–84 |doi= 10.3102/0034654307313793 }}&amp;lt;!--|access-date=March 6, 2010--&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Virtues}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Authority control}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Concepts in ethics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Semantics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>87.90.80.199</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>