Fanaticism

From Vero - Wikipedia
(Redirected from Fanatics)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Redirect

File:Eugène Delacroix - The Fanatics of Tangier - WGA06195.jpg
The Fanatics of Tangier by Eugène Delacroix, Minneapolis Institute of Arts

Fanaticism is a belief or behavior involving uncritical zeal or an obsessive enthusiasm. The political theorist Zachary R. Goldsmith provides a "cluster account" of the concept of fanaticism, identifying ten main attributes that, in various combinations, constitute it: messianism, inappropriate relationship to reason (irrationality), an embrace of abstraction, a desire for novelty, the pursuit of perfection, an opposition to limits, the embrace of violence, absolute certitude, excessive passion, and an attractiveness to intellectuals.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Definitions

File:Voltaire défendant l'Innocence contre le Fanatisme, S489(10).jpg
Etienne-Pierre-Adrien Gois, Voltaire defending Innocence against Fanaticism, circa 1791.

Philosopher George Santayana defines fanaticism as "redoubling your effort when you have forgotten your aim".<ref>Santayana, George (1905). Life of Reason: Reason in Common Sense. (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons) 13.</ref> The fanatic displays very strict standards and little tolerance for contrary ideas or opinions. Tõnu Lehtsaar has defined the term fanaticism as the pursuit or defence of something in an extreme and passionate way that goes beyond normality. Religious fanaticism is defined by blind faith, the persecution of dissidents and the absence of reality.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

Causes

File:President Marcos and Hiroo Onoda.jpg
Japanese holdouts persisted on various islands in the Pacific Theatre until at least 1974. Hiroo Onoda offering his military sword on the day of his surrender.

Fanaticism is a result from multiple cultures interacting with one another.<ref name=":0">Template:Cite journal</ref> Fanaticism occurs most frequently when a leader makes minor variations on already existing beliefs, which then drives the followers into a frenzy. In this case, fanaticism is used as an adjective describing the nature of certain behaviors that people recognize as cult-like. Margaret Mead referred to the style of defense used when the followers are approached.<ref name=":0" /> The most consistent thing presented is the priming, or preexisting, conditions and mind state needed to induce fanatical behavior. Each behavior is obvious once it is pointed out; a closed mind, no interest in debating the subject of worship, and over reaction to people who do not believe.<ref name=":0" />

In his book Crazy Talk, Stupid Talk, Neil Postman states that "the key to all fanatical beliefs is that they are self-confirming....(some beliefs are) fanatical not because they are 'false', but because they are expressed in such a way that they can never be shown to be false."<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Similar behaviors

The behavior of a fan with overwhelming enthusiasm for a given subject is differentiated from the behavior of a fanatic by the fanatic's violation of prevailing social norms. Though the fan's behavior may be judged as odd or eccentric, it does not violate such norms.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> A fanatic differs from a crank, in that a crank is defined as a person who holds a position or opinion which is so far from the norm as to appear ludicrous and/or probably wrong, such as a belief in a Flat Earth. In contrast, the subject of the fanatic's obsession may be "normal", such as an interest in religion or politics, except that the scale of the person's involvement, devotion, or obsession with the activity or cause is abnormal or disproportionate to the average.Template:Ambiguous

Types

Template:Unreferenced section

See also

Template:Wikiquote Template:Wiktionary

References

Template:Reflist

Further reading

Template:Authority control