Liberté, égalité, fraternité
Template:Short description Template:Italic title Template:Use dmy dates


{{#invoke:Lang|lang}} ({{#invoke:IPA|main}}; French for Template:Gloss, Template:Langx),<ref name="FrEmb">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> is the national motto of France and the Republic of Haiti, and is an example of a tripartite motto. Although its origins can be traced to the French Revolution, it was then only one motto among several popularized by revolutionaries and was not institutionalized until the Third Republic at the end of the 19th century.<ref name=Ozouf>Template:Citation (abridged translation, Realms of Memory, Columbia University Press, 1996–98).</ref> Debates concerning the compatibility and order of the three terms began at the same time as the Revolution. It is also the motto of the Grand Orient and the Grande Loge de France.
History
Origins during the French Revolution


Some claim that Camille Desmoulins invented the phrase, in number 35 of Révolutions de France et de Brabant, published on 26 July 1790.<ref>Hervé Leuwers, Camille et Lucile Desmoulins, Un rêve de république, p. 162</ref> However, it is not confirmed as this is only the first official mention of the phrase. Speaking of the July 1790 Fête de la Fédération festival, he described "the citizen-soldiers rushing into each other's arms, promising each other liberty, equality, fraternity." (French: les soldats-citoyens se précipiter dans les bras l’un de l’autre, en se promettant liberté, égalité, fraternité.)<ref>Camille Desmoulins, Révolutions de France et de Brabant, Number 35, p. 515</ref>
Several months later, Maximilien Robespierre popularized the phrase in his speech "On the organization of the National Guard" (Template:Langx), on 5 December 1790, article XVI, which was disseminated widely throughout France by the popular Societies.
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
Discours sur l'organisation des gardes nationales
Article XVI.
They will wear these words engraved on their uniforms: THE FRENCH PEOPLE, & below: LIBERTY, EQUALITY, FRATERNITY. The same words will be inscribed on flags which bear the three colors of the nation.
(Template:Langx){{#if:|
|}}{{#if:|
— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries
}}{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}
Credit for the motto has been given also to Antoine-François Momoro (1756–1794), a Parisian printer and Hébertist organizer.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> During the Federalist revolts in 1793, it was altered to "Unity, indivisibility of the Republic; liberty, equality, brotherhood or death" (Template:Langx).
In 1839, the philosopher Pierre Leroux claimed it had been an anonymous and popular creation.<ref name=Ozouf />Template:Page needed The historian Mona Ozouf underlines that, although Liberté and Égalité were associated as a motto during the 18th century, Fraternité wasn't always included in it, and other terms, such as Amitié (Friendship), Charité (Charity) or Union were often added in its place.<ref name=Ozouf />
In 1791, the emphasis upon Fraternité during the French Revolution, led Olympe de Gouges, a female journalist, to write the Declaration of the Rights of Woman and of the Female Citizen as a response.<ref>Template:Citation.</ref>Template:Page needed The tripartite motto was neither a creative collection, nor really institutionalized by the Revolution.<ref name=Ozouf /> As soon as 1789, other terms were used, such as "la Nation, la Loi, le Roi" (The Nation, The Law, The King), or "Union, Force, Vertu" (Union, Strength, Virtue), a slogan used beforehand by masonic lodges, or "Force, Égalité, Justice" (Strength, Equality, Justice), "Liberté, Sûreté, Propriété" (Liberty, Security, Property), etc.<ref name=Ozouf />
In other words, liberté, égalité, fraternité was one slogan among many others.<ref name=Ozouf /> During the Jacobin revolutionary period, various mottos were used, such as liberté, unité, égalité (liberty, unity, equality); liberté, égalité, justice (liberty, equality, justice); liberté, raison, égalité (liberty, reason, equality), etc.<ref name=Ozouf /> The only solid association was that of liberté and égalité, with fraternité being ignored by the Cahiers de doléances as well as by the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen.<ref name=Ozouf />
Fraternité was only alluded to in the 1791 Constitution, as well as in Robespierre's draft Declaration of 1793, placed under the invocation of (in that order) égalité, liberté, sûreté and propriété (equality, liberty, safety, property)—though it was used not as a motto, but as articles of declaration, as the possibility of a universal extension of the Declaration of Rights: "Men of all countries are brothers, he who oppresses one nation declares himself the enemy of all."<ref name=Ozouf />Template:Efn Fraternité did not figure in the August 1793 Declaration.<ref name=Ozouf />
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of 1789 defined liberty in Article 4 as follows:
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
Liberty consists of being able to do anything that does not harm others: thus, the exercise of the natural rights of every man or woman has no bounds other than those that guarantee other members of society the enjoyment of these same rights.{{#if:|
|}}{{#if:|
— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries
}}{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}
Equality was defined by the Declaration in terms of judicial equality and merit-based entry to government (art. 6):
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
[The law] must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal in its eyes, shall be equally eligible to all high offices, public positions and employments, according to their ability, and without other distinction than that of their virtues and talents.{{#if:|
|}}{{#if:|
— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries
}}{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}
{{#invoke:Lang|lang}} actually finds its origins in a May 1791 proposition by the Club des Cordeliers, following a speech on the Army by the Marquis de Guichardin.<ref name=Ozouf /> A British marine held prisoner on the French ship Le Marat in 1794, wrote home in letters published in 1796:<ref>Template:Citation.</ref>
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
The republican spirit is inculcated not in songs only, for in every part of the ship I find emblems purposely displayed to awaken it. All the orders relating to the discipline of the crew are hung up, and prefaced by the words Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité, ou la Mort, written in capital letters.{{#if:|
|}}{{#if:|
— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries
}}{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}
The compatibility of liberté and égalité was not in doubt in the first days of the Revolution, and the problem of the antecedence of one term on the other not lifted.<ref name=Ozouf /> Abbé Sieyès considered that only liberty ensured equality, unless equality was to be the equality of all, dominated by a despot, while liberty followed equality ensured by the rule of law.<ref name=Ozouf /> The abstract generality of law, theorized by Jean-Jacques Rousseau in his 1762 book The Social Contract, thus ensured the identification of liberty to equality, liberty being negatively defined as an independence from arbitrary rule, and equality considered abstractly in its judicial form.<ref name=Ozouf />
This identification of liberty and equality became problematic during the Jacobin period, when equality was redefined, for instance, by François-Noël Babeuf, as equality of results, and not only a judicial equality of rights.<ref name=Ozouf /> Thus, Marc Antoine Baudot considered that the French temperament was inclined towards equality than liberty, a theme which was re-used by Pierre Louis Roederer and Alexis de Tocqueville. Jacques Necker considered that an equal society could only be found on coercion.<ref name=Ozouf />

Freiheit Gleichheit Brüderlichk. od. Tod (Liberty Equality Fraternity or Death)
Tod den Tyranen (Death to Tyrants)
Heil den Völkern (Long live the Peoples)
The third term, fraternité, was the most problematic to insert in the triad, as it belonged to another sphere, that of moral obligations rather than rights, links rather than statutes, harmony rather than contract, and community rather than individual liberty.<ref name=Ozouf /> Various interpretations of fraternité existed. The first one, according to Mona Ozouf, was one of "fraternité de rébellion" (Fraternity of Rebellion),<ref name=Ozouf /> that is the union of the deputies in the Jeu de Paume Oath of June 1789, refusing the dissolution ordered by the King Louis XVI: "We swear never to separate ourselves from the National Assembly, and to reassemble wherever circumstances require, until the constitution of the realm is drawn up and fixed upon solid foundations." Fraternity was thus issued from Liberty, and oriented by a common cause.<ref name=Ozouf />
Another form of fraternité was that of the patriotic Church, which identified social links with religious links and based fraternity on Christian brotherhood.<ref name=Ozouf /> In this second sense, fraternité preceded both liberté and égalité, instead of following them as in the first sense.<ref name=Ozouf />Template:Page needed Thus, two senses of Fraternity: "one, that followed liberty and equality, was the object of a free pact; the other preceded liberty and equality as the mark on its work of the divine craftsman."<ref name=Ozouf />
Another hesitation concerning the compatibility of the three terms arose from the opposition between liberty and equality as individualistic values, and fraternity as the realization of a happy community, devoid of any conflicts and opposed to any form of egotism.<ref name=Ozouf /> This fusional interpretation of Fraternity opposed it to the project of individual autonomy and manifested the precedence of Fraternity on individual will.<ref name=Ozouf />
In this sense, it was sometimes associated with death, as in Fraternité, ou la Mort! (Fraternity or Death!), excluding liberty and even equality, by establishing a strong dichotomy between those who were brothers and those who were not, in the sense of "you are with me or against me", brother or foe.<ref name=Ozouf />Template:Page needed Louis de Saint-Just thus stigmatized Anacharsis Cloots' cosmopolitanism, declaring "Cloots liked the universe, except France."<ref name=Ozouf />
With the Thermidor and the execution of Robespierre, fraternité disappeared from the slogan, reduced to the two terms of liberty and equality, re-defined again as simple judicial equality and not as the equality upheld by the sentiment of fraternity.<ref name=Ozouf/> In 1799, the First Consul (Napoleon Bonaparte) established the motto liberté, ordre public (liberty, public order).
19th century
Following Napoleon's rule, the triptych dissolved itself, as none believed it possible to conciliate individual liberty and equality of rights with equality of results and fraternity.<ref name=Ozouf /> The idea of individual sovereignty and of natural rights possessed by man before being united in the collectivity, contradicted the possibility of establishing a transparent and fraternal community.<ref name=Ozouf /> Liberals accepted liberty and equality, defining the latter as equality of rights and ignoring fraternity.<ref name=Ozouf />
Early socialists rejected an independent conception of liberty, opposed to the social, and also despised equality, as they considered, as Fourier, that one had only to orchestrate individual discordances, to harmonize them, or they believed, as Saint-Simon, that equality contradicted equity, by a brutal levelling of individualities.<ref name=Ozouf /> Utopian socialism thus only valued fraternity, which was, in Cabet's Icarie, the sole commandment.<ref name=Ozouf />
This opposition between liberals and socialists was mirrored in rival historical interpretations of the Revolution, with liberals admiring 1789, and socialists admiring 1793.<ref name=Ozouf /> The July Revolution of 1830, establishing a constitutional monarchy headed by Louis-Philippe, substituted ordre et liberté (order and liberty) to the Napoleonic motto Liberté, Ordre public.<ref name=Ozouf />
Despite this apparent disappearance of the triptych, the latter was still being thought in some underground circles, in Republican secret societies, masonic lodges such as the "Indivisible Trinity," far-left booklets or during the Canuts Revolt in Lyon.<ref name=Ozouf /> In 1834, the lawyer of the Society of the Rights of Man (Société des droits de l'homme), Dupont, a liberal sitting in the far-left during the July Monarchy, associated the three terms together in the Revue Républicaine, which he edited:
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
|}}{{#if:|
— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries
}}{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}
In 1847, the triptych resurfaced during the Campagne des Banquets, upheld for example in Lille by Ledru-Rollin.<ref name=Ozouf />
Two interpretations had attempted to conciliate the three terms, beyond the antagonism between liberals and socialists. One was upheld by Catholic traditionalists, such as Chateaubriand or Ballanche, the other by socialist and republican such as Pierre Leroux.<ref name=Ozouf /> Chateaubriand gave a Christian interpretation of the revolutionary motto, stating in the 1841 conclusion to his Mémoires d'outre-tombe:
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
|}}{{#if:|
— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries
}}{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}
Neither Chateaubriand nor Ballanche considered the three terms to be antagonistic. Rather, they took them for being the achievement of Christianity. On the other hand, Pierre Leroux did not disguise the difficulties of associating the three terms, but superated it by considering liberty as the aim, equality as the principle and fraternity as the means.<ref name=Ozouf /> Leroux ordered the motto as Liberty, Fraternity, Equality,<ref name=Ozouf /> an order supported by Christian socialists, such as Buchez.<ref name=Ozouf />
Against this new order of the triptych, Michelet supported the traditional order, maintaining the primordial importance of an original individualistic right.<ref name=Ozouf /> Michelet attempted to conciliate a rational communication with a fraternal communication, "right beyond right",<ref name=Ozouf />Template:Page needed and thus the rival traditions of socialism and liberalism.<ref name=Ozouf /> The republican tradition would strongly inspire itself from Michelet's synchretism.<ref name=Ozouf />
1848 Revolution
Template:Multiple image With the 1848 February Revolution, the motto was officially adopted,<ref name="Frenchsymbols">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> mainly under the pressure of the people who had attempted to impose the red flag over the tricolor flag. The 1791 red flag was the symbol of martial law and of order, not of insurrection.<ref name=Ozouf /> Lamartine opposed popular aspirations, and in exchange of the maintaining of the tricolor flag, conceded the Republican motto of {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, written on the flag, on which a red rosette was added.<ref name=Ozouf /> It also appeared for the first time on coins.
Fraternity was then considered to resume, and to contain both Liberty and Equality, being a form of civil religion, which, far from opposing itself to Christianity, was associated with it in 1848<ref name=Ozouf />Template:Page needed establishing social links, as called for by Rousseau in the conclusion of the Social Contract.<ref name=Ozouf />
Fraternity was not devoid of its previous sense of opposition between brothers and foes, with images of blood haunting revolutionary Christian publications, taking in Lamennais' themes.<ref name=Ozouf /> Thus, the newspaper Le Christ républicain (The Republican Christ) developed the idea of the Christ bringing forth peace to the poor and war to the rich.<ref name=Ozouf /><ref>Le Christ républicain n°7, quoted by Mona Ozouf: "Nous, pauvres prolétaires, nous sommes rouges, parce que le Christ a versé son sang pour nous racheter, son sang par lequel nous voulons nous régénérer. Nous sommes rouges, parce que l'ange exterminateur a marqué le haut de nos portes avec le sang de l'agneau, pour distinguer, au jour de la vengeance, les élus d'avec les réprouvés.</ref>
On 6 January 1852, the future Napoleon III, first President of the Republic, ordered all prefects to erase the triptych from all official documents and buildings, conflating the words with insurrection and disorder.<ref name=Ozouf /> Auguste Comte applauded Napoleon, claiming equality to be the "symbol of metaphysical anarchism", and preferring to it his diptych "ordre et progrès", "order and progress", which became the motto of Brazil, Ordem e Progresso.<ref name="historianet">Template:Citation.</ref> Proudhon criticized fraternity as an empty word, which he associated with idealistic dreams of Romanticism.<ref name=Ozouf /> He preferred to it the sole term of liberty.
Paris Commune and Third Republic
Pache, mayor of the Paris Commune, painted the formula "Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité, ou la mort" on the walls of the commune. It was under the Third Republic that the motto was made official. It was then not dissociated with insurrection and revolutionary ardours, Opportunist Republicans such as Jules Ferry or Gambetta adapting it to the new political conditions.<ref>Ozouf p 584.</ref> Larousse's Dictionnaire universel deprived fraternity of its "evangelistic halo" (Mona Ozouf), conflating it with solidarity and the welfare role of the state.<ref name=Ozouf />
Some still opposed the Republican motto, such as the nationalist Charles Maurras in his Dictionnaire politique et critique, who claimed liberty to be an empty dream, equality an insanity, and only kept fraternity.<ref name=Ozouf /> Charles Péguy, renewing with Lamennais' thought, kept fraternity and liberty, excluding equality, seen as an abstract repartition between individuals reduced to homogeneity, opposing "fraternity" as a sentiment put in motion by "misery", while equality only interested itself, according to him, to the mathematical solution of the problem of "poverty."<ref name=Ozouf />
Péguy identified Christian charity and socialist solidarity in this conception of fraternity.<ref name=Ozouf /> On the other hand, Georges Vacher de Lapouge, the most important French author of pseudo-scientific racism and supporter of eugenism, completely rejected the republican triptych, adopting another motto, "déterminisme, inégalité, sélection" (determinism, inequality, selection). According to Ozouf, the sole use of a triptych was the sign of the influence of the republican motto, despite it being corrupted in its opposite.<ref name=Ozouf />
20th century

During the German occupation of France in World War II, this motto was replaced by the reactionary phrase "travail, famille, patrie" (work, family, fatherland)<ref name="WHKLMA">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref> by Marshal Pétain, who became the leader of the new Vichy French government in 1940. Pétain had taken this motto from the colonel de la Rocque's Parti social français (PSF), although the latter considered it more appropriate for a movement than for a regime.<ref name=Ozouf />
Following the Liberation, the Provisional Government of the French Republic (GPRF) re-established the Republican motto {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, which was incorporated into the 1946 and the 1958 French constitutions.<ref name="FrEmb" />
In 1956, the Algerian woman militant Zohra Drif, who during the Algerian War planted a bomb in the Milk Bar Cafe in which three French women were killed, justified this and other violent acts by the FLN, by asserting that the French Authorities did not see their dedication to the principles of Equality and Liberty as relevant in Algeria.
Usage by other nations
Many other nations have adopted the French slogan of "liberty, equality, and fraternity" as an ideal.
Since its founding, "Liberty, Equality and Brotherhood" has been the lemma of the Social Democratic Party of Denmark. In the United Kingdom the political party the Liberal Democrats refer to "the fundamental values of liberty, equality and community" in the preamble of the party's Federal Constitution, and this is printed on party membership cards.<ref name="LDFC">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
The Czech slogan "Rovnost, volnost, bratrství" was a motto of the Czech national gymnastics organization Sokol at the end of the 19th century. Liberal values of the fraternal organization manifested themselves in the Czech independence movement during World War I, when many Sokol members joined armies of the Allies and formed the Czechoslovak Legion to form independent Czechoslovakia in 1918.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>
The Philippine National Flag has a rectangular design that consists of a white equilateral triangle, symbolizing liberty, equality, and fraternity; a horizontal blue stripe for peace, truth, and justice; and a horizontal red stripe for patriotism and valor. In the center of the white triangle is an eight-rayed golden sun symbolizing unity, freedom, people's democracy, and sovereignty.
Some former colonies of the French Republic, such as Chad, Niger, and Gabon, have adopted similar three-word national mottos. Haiti has used it on its coins since 1872, having used "Liberte Egalite" on earlier coinage since 1828.
The idea of the slogan "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity" has influenced as natural law, the First Article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.<ref>Template:Citation.</ref>{{#if:|
|}}{{#if:|
— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries
}}{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}
Since 1848, the motto has been present on the throne of the Grand masters of Latin Freemasonry.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }} Quote: "For over 300 years, the principle of Brotherhood has been indelibly inscribed in the Masonic triad placed in the East in temples alongside those of Liberty and Equality.".</ref> Freedom also alludes to the inner freedom from spiritual chains that are broken with the initiatory work.<ref>Lino Sacchi, Massoneria. Una introduzione, Lindau, serie "I leoni", Torino 2024, p. 160. Template:ISBN, Template:OCLC</ref> Lodovico Frapolliit, former Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Italy, suggested to substitute "fraternity" with "solidarity".<ref>Frapolli, Lodovico, La franc-maçonnerie réformée essai de philosophie naturelle, Typography V. Vercellino, Torino 1864, 62 pp. Quote: "What has become of equality in Nature? It is limited by diversity and, given that this diversity is found everywhere, it follows that equality does not exist anywhere. We must therefore be content to recognise it in law and we must replace it, in formulas as well as in aspirations, with solidarity, which is truer, more charitable and more fruitful. Because – we must repeat it – equality does not exist in Nature, while solidarity is found everywhere in the organism of the world. In human societies, equality, considered not as a law but as a principle, is envy, jealousy, hatred – solidarity, on the other hand, is the aspiration to perfection, and charity, love. Equality is revolt and destruction: solidarity and reconstruction on the basis of justice is the future."</ref>
See also
- List of political slogans
- "Give me liberty or give me death!"
- "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness"
- "{{#invoke:Lang|lang}}" — the national motto of monarchic France
- "{{#invoke:Lang|lang}}" – the national motto of Vichy France
- "{{#invoke:Lang|lang}}" ("God, Fatherland, and Family") – the national motto of Portugal under Estado Novo
- Brotherhood and unity
- Three Principles of the People
- Diversity, equity, and inclusion
Notes
References
Further reading
- Mathijsen, Marita. "The emancipation of the past, as due to the Revolutionary French ideology of Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité." Free Access to the Past ed Lotte Jensen (Brill, 2010). 20–40.
- Roth, Guenther. "Durkheim and the principles of 1789: the issue of gender equality." Telos 1989.82 (1989): 71–88.
- Sénac, Réjane. "The Contemporary Conversation about the French Connection "Liberté, égalité, fraternité": Neoliberal Equality and "Non-brothers." Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique. French Journal of British Studies 21.XXI-1 (2016). online
External links
- Liberty, Equality, Fraternity on the website of the French Presidency
Template:French Revolution navbox Template:Symbols of the French Republic Template:Portal bar