View source for A Modest Proposal

{{Short description|1729 satirical essay by Jonathan Swift}}
{{Use British English|date=October 2017}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2017}}
{{Infobox book
| name     = A Modest Proposal
| image    = File:A Modest Proposal 1729 Cover.jpg
| caption  = 1729 London printing of ''A Modest Proposal''
| author   = [[Jonathan Swift]]
| subject  = [[Social commentary]]
| genre    = [[Satirical]] essay
| pub_date = 1729
| pages     = 64
| publisher = S. Harding
| language = English 
| wikisource = The Works of the Rev. Jonathan Swift/Volume 9/A Modest Proposal
}}

'''''A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of Poor People from Being a Burthen<!-- NOTE: This is the original spelling. Please do not modify it. Thank you. --> to Their Parents or Country, and for Making Them Beneficial to the Publick<!-- NOTE: This is the original spelling. Please do not modify it. Thank you. -->''''',<ref name="gutenberg">{{cite book | url=http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1080/1080-h/1080-h.htm | title=A Modest Proposal, by Dr. Jonathan Swift | publisher=[[Project Gutenberg]] | date=27 July 2008 | access-date=10 January 2012}}</ref> commonly referred to as '''''A Modest Proposal''''', is a [[Juvenalian satire|Juvenalian satirical]] essay written and published by [[Anglo-Irish people|Anglo-Irish]] writer and clergyman [[Jonathan Swift]] in 1729. The essay suggests that poor people in [[Kingdom of Ireland|Ireland]] could ease their economic troubles by selling their children [[Child cannibalism|as food]] to the [[elite]]. In English writing, the phrase "a [[wikt:modest proposal|modest proposal]]" is now conventionally an allusion to this style of straight-faced satire. 

Swift's use of satirical [[hyperbole]] was intended to mock the hostile attitudes towards the poor, [[anti-Catholicism]] among the [[Protestant Ascendancy]], and the [[Dublin Castle administration]]'s governing policies in general.<ref>Swift notes that "the number of Popish infants, is at least three to one in this kingdom, and therefore it will have one another collateral advantage, by lessening the number of Papists among us."</ref> In essence, Swift wrote the essay primarily to highlight the dehumanising approach towards the Irish poor by both the British government and the wealthy landowners, repeatedly mocking their indifference and exploitative behavior. This satirical tone underlines the absurdity of treating poor people like common commodities and products, and exposes the shortcomings of the [[high society]]'s morality. The essay also narrates the harsh colonial [[British rule in Ireland|rule of Great Britain over Ireland]] during Swift's time, the abusive practices of wealthy people, especially government officials, and the inaction of the Irish people themselves in addressing their own problems.  

The work is one of Swift's most acclaimed essays, and is noted for its wit, satire and dark humor. The themes of social injustice, exploitation of the poor, widespread poverty, and the dehumanisation of the [[lower social class]] explored in the essay remain relevant in contemporary discussions about social justice and human rights.

==Synopsis==
[[File:Jonathan Swift by Charles Jervas detail.jpg|thumb|A painting of [[Jonathan Swift]]]]

Swift's essay is widely held to be one of the greatest examples of sustained [[irony]] in the history of [[English literature]]. Much of its shock value derives from the fact that the first portion of the essay describes the plight of starving beggars in Ireland, so that the reader is unprepared for the surprise of Swift's solution when he states: "A young healthy child well nursed, is, at a year old, a most delicious nourishing and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a [[fricassee]], or a [[ragout]]."<ref name="gutenberg" />

Swift goes to great lengths to support his argument, including a list of possible preparation styles for the children, and calculations showing the financial benefits of his suggestion. He uses methods of argument throughout his essay which [[Parody|lampoon]] the then-influential [[William Petty]] and the [[Social engineering (political science)|social engineering]] popular among followers of [[Francis Bacon]]. These lampoons include [[Appeal to authority|appealing to the authority]] of "a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London" and "the famous [[George Psalmanazar|Psalmanazar]], a native of the island [[Formosa]]" (who had already confessed to not being from Formosa in 1706).

In the tradition of Roman satire, Swift introduces the reforms he is actually suggesting by [[paralipsis]]:
{{quote|Therefore let no man talk to me of other expedients: Of taxing our [[absentee landlords|absentees]] at five [[shilling (British coin)|shillings]] a [[pound sterling|pound]]: Of using neither clothes, nor household furniture, except what is of our own growth and manufacture: Of utterly rejecting the materials and instruments that promote foreign luxury: Of curing the expensiveness of pride, vanity, idleness, and gaming in our women: Of introducing a vein of parsimony, prudence and temperance: Of learning to love our country, wherein we differ even from [[Sami people|Laplanders]], and the [[Tupinambá people|inhabitants of Topinamboo]]: Of quitting our animosities and factions, nor acting any longer like the Jews, who were [[Zealot Temple siege|murdering one another]] at the very moment [[Siege of Jerusalem (70)|their city was taken]]: Of being a little cautious not to sell our country and consciences for nothing: Of teaching landlords to have at least one degree of mercy towards their tenants. Lastly, of putting a spirit of honesty, industry, and skill into our shop-keepers, who, if a resolution could now be taken to buy only our native goods, would immediately unite to cheat and exact upon us in the price, the measure, and the goodness, nor could ever yet be brought to make one fair proposal of just dealing, though often and earnestly invited to it.

Therefore I repeat, let no man talk to me of these and the like expedients, 'till he hath at least some glympse of hope, that there will ever be some hearty and sincere attempt to put them into practice.}}

==Population solutions==
George Wittkowsky argued that Swift's main target in ''A Modest Proposal'' was not the conditions in Ireland, but rather the can-do spirit of the times that led people to devise a number of illogical schemes that would purportedly solve social and economic ills.<ref name="Wittkowsky_p76">Wittkowsky, ''Swift’s Modest Proposal'', p. 76</ref> Swift was especially attacking projects that tried to fix population and labour issues with a simple cure-all solution.<ref name="Wittkowsky_p85">Wittkowsky, ''Swift’s Modest Proposal'', p. 85</ref> A memorable example of these sorts of schemes "involved the idea of running the poor through a [[joint-stock company]]".<ref name="Wittkowsky_p85"/> In response, Swift's ''Modest Proposal'' was "a burlesque of projects concerning the poor"<ref name="Wittkowsk_p88">Wittkowsky, ''Swift's Modest Proposal'', p. 88</ref> that were in vogue during the early 18th century.

Ian McBride argues that the point of  ''A Modest Proposal'' was to "find a suitably decisive means of dehumanizing the settlers who had failed so comprehensively to meet their social responsibilities".<ref>McBride, Ian (2019). "The Politics of ''A Modest Proposal'': Swift and the Irish Crisis of the Late 1720s." ''Past & Present''. '''244''' (1): 89–122.</ref> 
''A Modest Proposal'' also targets the calculating way people perceived the poor in designing their projects. The pamphlet targets reformers who "regard people as commodities".<ref name="Wittkowsky_p101">Wittkowsky, ''Swift's Modest Proposal'', p. 101</ref> In the piece, Swift adopts the "technique of a political arithmetician"<ref name="Wittkowsky_p95">Wittkowsky, ''Swift's Modest Proposal'', p. 95</ref> to show the utter ridiculousness of trying to prove any proposal with dispassionate statistics.

Critics differ about Swift's intentions in using this faux-mathematical philosophy. [[Edmund Wilson]] argues that statistically "the logic of the 'Modest proposal' can be compared with defence of crime (arrogated to [[Karl Marx|Marx]]) in which he argues that crime takes care of the superfluous population".<ref name="Wittkowsky_p95"/> Wittkowsky counters that Swift's satiric use of statistical analysis is an effort to enhance his satire that "springs from a spirit of bitter mockery, not from the delight in calculations for their own sake".<ref name="Wittkowsky_p98">Wittkowsky, ''Swift's Modest Proposal'', p. 98</ref>

==Rhetoric==
Author Charles K. Smith argues that Swift's rhetorical style persuades the reader to detest the speaker and pity the Irish. Swift's specific strategy is twofold, using a "trap"<ref name="Smith_p135">Smith, ''Toward a Participatory Rhetoric'', p. 135</ref> to create sympathy for the Irish and a dislike of the narrator who, in the span of one sentence, "details vividly and with rhetorical emphasis the grinding poverty" but feels emotion solely for members of his own class.<ref name="Smith_p136">Smith, ''Toward a Participatory Rhetoric'', p. 136</ref> Swift's use of gripping details of poverty and his narrator's cool approach towards them create "two opposing points of view" that "alienate the reader, perhaps unconsciously, from a narrator who can view with 'melancholy' detachment a subject that Swift has directed us, rhetorically, to see in a much less detached way."<ref name="Smith_p136"/>

Swift has his proposer further degrade the Irish by using language ordinarily reserved for animals. Lewis argues that the speaker uses "the vocabulary of animal husbandry"<ref name="Smith_p138">Smith, ''Toward a Participatory Rhetoric'', p. 138</ref> to describe the Irish. Once the children have been commodified, Swift's rhetoric can easily turn "people into animals, then meat, and from meat, logically, into tonnage worth a price per pound".<ref name="Smith_p138"/>

Swift uses the proposer's serious tone to highlight the absurdity of his proposal. In making his argument, the speaker uses the conventional, textbook-approved order of argument from Swift's time (which was derived from the Latin rhetorician [[Quintilian]]).<ref name="Smith_p139">Smith, ''Toward a Participatory Rhetoric'', p. 139</ref> The contrast between the "careful control against the almost inconceivable perversion of his scheme" and "the ridiculousness of the proposal" create a situation in which the reader has "to consider just what perverted values and assumptions would allow such a diligent, thoughtful, and conventional man to propose so perverse a plan".<ref name="Smith_p139"/>

==Influences==
Scholars have speculated about which earlier works Swift may have had in mind when he wrote ''A Modest Proposal''.

===Tertullian's ''Apology''===
James William Johnson argues that ''A Modest Proposal'' was largely influenced and inspired by [[Tertullian]]'s ''[[Apologeticus|Apology]]'': a satirical attack against early [[Persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire|Roman persecution of Christianity]]. Johnson believes that Swift saw major similarities between the two situations.<ref name="Johnson_p563">Johnson, ''Tertullian and A Modest Proposal'', p. 563</ref> Johnson notes Swift's obvious affinity for Tertullian and the bold stylistic and structural similarities between the works ''A Modest Proposal'' and ''Apology''.<ref name="Johnson_p562">Johnson, ''Tertullian and A Modest Proposal'', p. 562</ref> In structure, Johnson points out the same central theme, that of cannibalism and the eating of babies as well as the same final argument, that "human depravity is such that men will attempt to justify their own cruelty by accusing their victims of being lower than human".<ref name="Johnson_p563"/> Stylistically, Swift and Tertullian share the same command of sarcasm and language.<ref name="Johnson_p563"/> In agreement with Johnson, Donald C. Baker points out the similarity between both authors' tones and use of irony. Baker notes the uncanny way that both authors imply an ironic "justification by ownership" over the subject of sacrificing children—Tertullian while attacking pagan parents, and Swift while attacking the mistreatment of the poor in Ireland.<ref name="Baker_p219">Baker, ''Tertullian and Swift's A Modest Proposal'', p. 219</ref>

===Defoe's ''The Generous Projector''===
It has also been argued that ''A Modest Proposal'' was, at least in part, a response to the 1728 essay ''The Generous Projector or, A Friendly Proposal to Prevent Murder and Other Enormous Abuses, By Erecting an Hospital for Foundlings and Bastard Children'' by Swift's rival [[Daniel Defoe]].<ref>{{cite web|last=Waters|first=Juliet|date=19 February 2009|title=A modest but failed proposal|url=http://www.montrealmirror.com/2009/021909/books1.html|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200727224602/http://www.montrealmirror.com/a-modest-but-failed-proposal|archive-date=2020-07-27|access-date=10 January 2012|work=[[Montreal Mirror]]}}</ref>

=== Mandeville's ''Modest Defence of Publick Stews'' ===
[[Bernard Mandeville]]'s ''Modest Defence of Publick Stews'' asked to introduce public and state-controlled [[bordello]]s. The 1726 paper acknowledges women's interests and—while not being a completely satirical text—has also been discussed as an inspiration for Jonathan Swift's title.<ref name="hur">Eine Streitschrift..., Essay von Ursula Pia Jauch. Carl Hanser Verlag, München 2001.</ref><ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2V_HAAAAQBAJ |title=Bernard Mandeville's "A Modest Defence of Publick Stews": Prostitution and Its Discontents in Early Georgian England |last=Primer |first=I. |date=15 March 2006 |publisher=Springer |isbn=9781403984609}}</ref> Mandeville had by 1705 already become famous for ''[[The Fable of the Bees]]'' and deliberations on private vices and public benefits.

=== John Locke's ''First Treatise of Government'' ===
[[John Locke]] commented: "Be it then as Sir Robert says, that Anciently, it was usual for Men to sell and Castrate their Children. Let it be, that they exposed them; Add to it, if you please, for this is still greater Power, ''that they begat them for their Tables to fat and eat them'': If this proves a right to do so, we may, by the same Argument, justifie Adultery, Incest and Sodomy, for there are examples of these too, both Ancient and Modern; Sins, which I suppose, have the Principle Aggravation from this, that they cross the main intention of Nature, which willeth the increase of Mankind, and the continuation of the Species in the highest perfection, and the distinction of Families, with the Security of the Marriage Bed, as necessary thereunto". (First Treatise, sec. 59).

==Economic themes==
Robert Phiddian's article "Have you eaten yet? The Reader in A Modest Proposal" focuses on two aspects of ''A Modest Proposal'': the voice of Swift and the voice of the Proposer. Phiddian stresses that a reader of the pamphlet must learn to distinguish between the satirical voice of Jonathan Swift and the apparent economic projections of the Proposer. He reminds readers that "there is a gap between the narrator's meaning and the text's, and that a moral-political argument is being carried out by means of parody".<ref name="Phiddian_p6">Phiddian, ''Have You Eaten Yet?'', p. 6</ref>

While Swift's proposal is obviously not a serious economic proposal, George Wittkowsky, author of "Swift's Modest Proposal: The Biography of an Early Georgian Pamphlet", argues that to understand the piece fully it is important to understand the economics of Swift's time. Wittowsky argued that an insufficient number of critics have taken the time to focus directly on mercantilism and theories of labour in [[Georgian era]] Britain. "If one regards the ''Modest Proposal'' simply as a criticism of condition, about all one can say is that conditions were bad and that Swift's irony brilliantly underscored this fact".<ref name="Phiddian_p3">Phiddian, ''Have You Eaten Yet?'', p. 3</ref>

==="People are the riches of a nation"===
At the start of a new industrial age in the 18th century, it was believed that "people are the riches of the nation", and there was a general faith in an economy that paid its workers low wages because high wages meant workers would work less.<ref name="Phiddian_p4">Phiddian, ''Have You Eaten Yet?'', p. 4</ref> Furthermore, "in the [[mercantilism|mercantilist]] view no child was too young to go into industry". In those times, the "somewhat more humane attitudes of an earlier day had all but disappeared and the laborer had come to be regarded as a commodity".<ref name="Phiddian_p6"/>

Louis A. Landa composed a conducive analysis when he noted that it would have been healthier for the Irish economy to more appropriately utilize their human assets by giving the people an opportunity to "become a source of wealth to the nation" or else they "must turn to begging and thievery".<ref name="Landa_p161" /> This opportunity may have included giving the farmers more coin to work for, diversifying their professions, or even consider enslaving their people to lower coin usage and build up financial stock in Ireland. Landa wrote that, "Swift is maintaining that the maxim—people are the riches of a nation—applies to Ireland only if Ireland is permitted slavery or cannibalism."<ref name="Landa_p165" />

Landa presents Swift's ''A Modest Proposal'' as a critique of the popular and unjustified maxim of mercantilism in the 18th century that "people are the riches of a nation".<ref name="Landa_p161">Landa, ''A Modest Proposal and Populousness'', p. 161</ref> Swift presents the dire state of Ireland and shows that mere population itself, in Ireland's case, did not always mean greater wealth and economy.<ref name="Landa_p165">Landa, ''A Modest Proposal and Populousness'', p. 165</ref> The uncontrolled maxim fails to take into account that a person who does not produce in an economic or political way makes a country poorer, not richer.<ref name="Landa_p165" /> Swift also recognises the implications of this fact in making mercantilist philosophy a paradox: the wealth of a country is based on the poverty of the majority of its citizens.<ref name="Landa_p165" /> Landa argued that Swift was putting the onus "on England of vitiating the working of natural economic law in Ireland" by denying Irishmen "the same natural rights common to the rest of mankind".<ref name="Landa_p165" />

== Public reaction ==
[[File:Godfrey-kneller-portrait-of-allen-bathurst.-1st-earl-bathurst.jpg|thumb|upright|Allen Bathurst, 1st Earl Bathurst]]

Swift's essay created a backlash within Georgian society after its publication. The work was aimed at the elite, and they responded in turn. Several prominent members of society wrote to Swift regarding the work. [[Allen Bathurst, 1st Earl Bathurst|Lord Bathurst]]'s letter (12 February 1729–30) intimated that he certainly understood the message, and interpreted it as a work of comedy:

{{quote|I did immediately propose it to Lady Bathurst, as your advice, particularly for her last boy, which was born the plumpest, finest thing, that could be seen; but she fell in a passion, and bid me send you word, that she would not follow your direction, but that she would breed him up to be a parson, and he should live upon the fat of the land; or a lawyer, and then, instead of being eat himself, he should devour others. You know women in passion never mind what they say; but, as she is a very reasonable woman, I have almost brought her over now to your opinion; and having convinced her, that as matters stood, we could not possibly maintain all the nine, she does begin to think it reasonable the youngest should raise fortunes for the eldest: and upon that foot a man may perform family duty with more courage and zeal; for, if he should happen to get twins, the selling of one might provide for the other. Or if, by any accident, while his wife lies in with one child, he should get a second upon the body of another woman, he might dispose of the fattest of the two, and that would help to breed up the other.

The more I think upon this scheme, the more reasonable it appears to me; and it ought by no means to be confined to Ireland; for, in all probability, we shall, in a very little time, be altogether as poor here as you are there. I believe, indeed, we shall carry it farther, and not confine our luxury only to the eating of children; for I happened to peep the other day into a large assembly [Parliament] not far from Westminster-hall, and I found them roasting a great fat fellow, [ [[Robert Walpole|Walpole]] again ] For my own part, I had not the least inclination to a slice of him; but, if I guessed right, four or five of the company had a devilish mind to be at him. Well, adieu, you begin now to wish I had ended, when I might have done it so conveniently.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=HkEUAAAAYAAJ&rdid=book-HkEUAAAAYAAJ&rdot=1|title=The Works of Jonathan Swift: Containing Additional Letters, Tracts, and Poems Not Hitherto Published; with Notes and a Life of the Author|last1=Swift|first1=Jonathan|last2=Scott|first2=Sir Walter|date=1814|publisher=A. Constable|language=en}}</ref>}}

==Modern usage==
''[[A Modest Video Game Proposal]]'' is the title of an open letter sent by activist/former attorney [[Jack Thompson (activist)|Jack Thompson]] on 10 October 2005.<ref name="Saunderson">{{cite web|last=Saunderson|first=Matt|date=October 10, 2005|title=Attorney Proposes Violent Game|url=http://gc.advancedmn.com/article.php?artid=5883|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051030003500/http://gc.advancedmn.com/article.php?artid=5883|archive-date=2005-10-30|work=GameCube Advanced|publisher=Advanced Media Network}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Gibson|first=Ellie|date=2005-10-18|title=Thompson refuses to make $10k donation to charity|url=https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/news181005thompsonrefuses|access-date=2021-03-02|website=Eurogamer|language=en}}</ref>

The 2012 horror film [[Butcher Boys (2012 film)|''Butcher Boys'']], written by the original ''[[The Texas Chain Saw Massacre]]'' scribe [[Kim Henkel]], is said to be an updating of Jonathan Swift's ''A Modest Proposal''. Henkel imagined the descendants of folks who actually took Swift up on his proposal.<ref>{{cite news|title=A 'Texas Chain Saw' Pedigree|url=https://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/screens/2013-10-08/a-texas-chain-saw-pedigree/|website=www.austinchronicle.com |last=O'Connell |first=Joe}}</ref> The film opens with a quote from J. Swift.<ref>{{cite web|title=Exclusive: Kim Henkel Talks Butcher Boys|url=https://www.dreadcentral.com/news/47860/exclusive-kim-henkel-talks-butcher-boys/|website=www.dreadcentral.com |last=Barton |first=Steve|date=6 September 2013}}</ref>

The 2023 song "[[Eat Your Young]]" written by Irish musician [[Hozier (musician)|Hozier]] is a reference to "A Modest Proposal".<ref>{{cite news|title=Hozier rises from his slumber with "Eat Your Young"|url=https://berkeleybeacon.com/hozier-rises-from-his-slumber-with-eat-your-young/|work=The Berkeley Beacon |last=Choi | first=Rachel |date=March 22, 2023}}</ref> It combines themes regarding the anti-war and anti-income-inequality movement, and uses Swift's essay as a framework to compare those modern problems to those same problems during Swift's time.<ref>{{Cite AV media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjQMUK4lQvs |title=Hozier "Eat Your Young" Official Lyrics & Meaning {{!}} Genius Verified |date=2023-09-22 |last=Genius |access-date=2025-08-17 |via=YouTube}}</ref>

The July 2023 [[Channel 4]] mockumentary ''[[Gregg Wallace: The British Miracle Meat]]'', written by British comedy writer Matt Edmonds,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4889856/ |title=Matthew Edmonds |website=IMDb.com |access-date=27 July 2023}}</ref> updates ''A Modest Proposal'' and presents it in a similar format to Wallace's ''[[Inside the Factory]]'', with human meat given as a potential solution to the [[2021–present_United_Kingdom_cost-of-living_crisis|UK's cost of living crisis]]. The words "a modest proposal" are used in Wallace's summing up at the end of the programme, and Swift is credited.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2023/jul/26/british-miracle-meat-story-behind-one-best-hoaxes-tv-history |title=The British Miracle Meat: the story behind one of the best TV hoaxes in history |first=Steve |last=Rose|date=26 July 2023 |work=The Guardian }}</ref>

==See also==

* [[Cannibalism in literature]]
* [[Child cannibalism]]

==Notes==
{{Reflist}}

==References==
* {{citation
| last = Baker | first = Donald C
| title = Tertullian and Swift's ''A Modest Proposal''
| journal = The Classical Journal
| volume = 52
| year = 1957
| pages = 219–220}}
* {{citation
| last = Johnson | first = James William
| title = Tertullian and ''A Modest Proposal''
| journal = Modern Language Notes
| volume = 73
| year = 1958
| pages = 561–563
| doi = 10.2307/3043246
| issue = 8
| jstor = 3043246
| publisher = The Johns Hopkins University Press }} (subscription needed)
* {{citation
| last = Landa | first = Louis A
| title = ''A Modest Proposal'' and Populousness
| journal = Modern Philology
| volume = 40
| year = 1942
| issue = 2
| pages = 161–170
| doi = 10.1086/388567| s2cid = 159465806
}}
* {{citation
| last = Phiddian | first = Robert
| title = Have You Eaten Yet? The Reader in ''A Modest Proposal''
| journal = SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900
| pages = 603–621
| volume = 36
| issue = 3
| year = 1996
| doi = 10.2307/450801
| jstor = 450801
| publisher = Rice University| hdl = 2328/746
| hdl-access = free
}}
* {{citation
| last = Smith | first = Charles Kay
| title = Toward a Participatory Rhetoric: Teaching Swift's ''Modest Proposal''
| journal = College English
| volume = 30
| issue = 2
| year = 1968
| pages = 135–149
| doi = 10.2307/374449
| jstor = 374449
| publisher = National Council of Teachers of English| url = https://www.academia.edu/12612028
}}
* {{citation
| last = Wittkowsky | first =  George
| title = Swift's ''Modest Proposal'': The Biography of an Early Georgian Pamphlet
| journal = Journal of the History of Ideas
| volume = 4
| issue = 1
| year = 1943
| pages = 75–104
| doi = 10.2307/2707237
| jstor = 2707237
| publisher = University of Pennsylvania Press}}

==External links==
{{wikisource}}
* [https://celt.ucc.ie/published/E700001-022/ ''A Modest Proposal'' (CELT)]
* [[gutenberg:1080|''A Modest Proposal'' (Gutenberg)]]
* ''[https://www.owleyes.org/text/modest-proposal A Modest Proposal]'' – Annotated text aligned to Common Core Standards
* {{librivox book | title= A Modest Proposal | author=H. Jonathan Swift}}
* [https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00h3650 ''A Modest Proposal''] BBC Radio 4 ''[[In Our Time (BBC Radio 4)|In Our Time]]'' with [[Melvyn Bragg]]
* '[https://books.google.com/books?id=t1MJAAAAQAAJ ''A modest proposal For preventing the children of poor people From being a Burthen to their Parents or the Country, And for making them Beneficial to the publick'']. The Third Edition, Dublin, Printed: And Reprinted at London, for Weaver Bickerton, in Devereux-Court near the Middle-Temple, 1730.

{{Jonathan Swift|state=expanded}}
{{Population}}
{{Authority control}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Modest Proposal, A}}
[[Category:1729 essays]]
[[Category:1729 in Great Britain]]
[[Category:1729 books]]
[[Category:Essays by Jonathan Swift]]
[[Category:Satirical essays]]
[[Category:Pamphlets]]
[[Category:British satire]]
[[Category:Fiction about cannibalism]]
[[Category:Works about Ireland]]