View source for Baruch Spinoza

{{Short description|Portuguese-Dutch philosopher (1632–1677)}}
{{Redirect|Spinoza}}
{{pp-extended|small=yes}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2022}}
{{Infobox philosopher
| region      = {{tree list}}
* [[Western philosophy]]
{{tree list/end}}
| era         = {{plainlist|
* [[17th-century philosophy]]
* [[Age of Enlightenment]]
}}
| image       = Spinoza.jpg
| name        = Baruch Spinoza
| birth_name  = Baruch Espinosa{{sfn|Nadler|1999|p=45}}{{\}}<br/>Bento de Spinosa{{sfn|Nadler|1999|p=119}}
| other_names = Benedictus de Spinoza
| birth_date  = {{Birth date|df=yes|1632|11|24}}
| birth_place = [[Amsterdam]], [[Dutch Republic]]
| death_date  = {{Death date and age|df=yes|1677|2|21|1632|11|24}}
| death_place = [[The Hague]], Dutch Republic
| signature   = Spinoza's signature (1664).svg
| education   = {{plainlist|
* Talmud Torah
* [[University of Leiden]] (no degree){{sfn|Adler|2014|p=27}}
}}
| school_tradition = {{plainlist|
* [[Cartesianism]]{{sfn|Garber|2015|p=121}}
* [[Conceptualism]]{{sfn|Newlands|2017|p=64}}
* [[Correspondence theory of truth]]{{efn|Spinoza has also been interpreted as a defender of the [[coherence theory of truth]].<ref>{{Cite SEP|url-id=truth-coherence|title=The Coherence Theory of Truth|first=James O.|last=Young|date=June 26, 2018}}</ref>}}<ref>{{Cite SEP|url-id=truth-correspondence|title=The Correspondence Theory of Truth|first=Marian|last=David|date=May 28, 2015}}</ref>
* [[Direct realism]]{{sfn|Koistinen|2018|p=288}}
* [[Foundationalism]] (according to [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel|Hegel]]){{sfn|Kreines|2015|p=25}}
* [[Rationalism]]
* [[Psychological Egoism]]<ref>{{Cite SEP|url-id=spinoza-psychological|title=Spinoza's Psychological Theory|first=Michael|last=LeBuffe|date=May 26, 2020}}</ref>
}}
| main_interests = {{hlist|[[Epistemology]]|[[ethics]]|[[Hebrew Bible]]{{sfn|Yovel|1989b|p=3}}|[[metaphysics]]}}
}}
{{Jewish philosophy}}

'''Baruch''' ('''de''') '''Spinoza'''{{efn|{{IPAc-en|b|ə|ˈ|r|uː|k|_|s|p|ɪ|ˈ|n|oʊ|z|ə}};<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/spinoza |title=Spinoza |work=[[Collins English Dictionary]]|publisher=[[HarperCollins]]|access-date=27 April 2019}}</ref> Dutch: {{IPA|nl|baːˈrux spɪˈnoːzaː|}}; Portuguese: {{IPA|pt|ðɨ ʃpiˈnɔzɐ|}}; {{Langx|he|ברוך שפינוזה}}. His boyhood and early adult business name was "Bento", and his synagogue name was "Baruch", the Hebrew translation of "Bento", which means "blessed".{{sfn|Nadler|1999|p=42}} As a correspondent, he primarily signed his name as "Benedictus".{{sfn|Israel|2023|pp=353-54}}}} (24 November 1632{{spaced ndash}}21 February 1677), also known under his Latinized pen name '''Benedictus de Spinoza''', was a philosopher of [[Spanish and Portuguese Jews|Portuguese-Jewish]] origin, who was born in the [[Dutch Republic]]. A forerunner of the [[Age of Enlightenment]], Spinoza significantly influenced modern [[biblical criticism]], 17th-century [[rationalism]], and Dutch intellectual culture, establishing himself as one of the most important and radical philosophers of the [[early modern period]].{{sfn|Nadler|2018|pp=xiii-xiv}} Influenced by [[Stoicism]], [[Thomas Hobbes]], [[René Descartes]],<ref>{{cite web |last=Schmitter |first=Amy M. |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |editor-link=Edward N. Zalta |title=Spinoza on the Emotions |website=[[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]] |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotions-17th18th/LD5Spinoza.html |date=8 Apr 2021}}</ref> [[Ibn Tufayl]],{{sfn|Attar|2007|p=52}} and [[heterodoxy|heterodox]] Christians, Spinoza was a leading philosopher of the [[Dutch Golden Age]].{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=63}}

Spinoza was born in [[Amsterdam]] to a [[Marrano]] family that fled [[Kingdom of Portugal|Portugal]] for the more tolerant [[Dutch Republic]]. He received a traditional Jewish education, learning [[Hebrew language|Hebrew]] and studying sacred texts within the [[Portuguese Jewish]] community, where his father was a prominent merchant. As a young man, Spinoza challenged rabbinic authority and questioned Jewish doctrines, leading to his [[Herem (censure)|permanent expulsion]] from his Jewish community in 1656. Following that expulsion, he distanced himself from all religious affiliations and devoted himself to philosophical inquiry and lens grinding. Spinoza attracted a dedicated circle of followers who gathered to discuss his writings and joined him in the intellectual pursuit of truth.

Spinoza published little, to avoid persecution and bans on his books. In his ''[[Tractatus Theologico-Politicus]]'', described by [[Steven Nadler]] as "one of the most important books of Western thought", Spinoza questioned the divine origin of the [[Hebrew Bible]] and the nature of [[God]] while arguing that ecclesiastic authority should have no role in a secular, democratic state.{{sfn|Nadler|2011|pp=xi-xii}}{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=332}} ''[[Ethics (Spinoza book)|Ethics]]'' argues for a [[pantheistic]] view of God and explores the place of human freedom in a world devoid of theological, cosmological, and political moorings.{{sfn|Stewart|2006|p=308}} Rejecting messianism and the emphasis on the afterlife, Spinoza emphasized appreciating and valuing life for oneself and others. By advocating for individual liberty in its moral, psychological, and metaphysical dimensions, Spinoza helped establish the genre of political writing called [[secular theology]].{{sfn|Smith|1997|pp=2-3}}

Spinoza's philosophy spans nearly every area of philosophical discourse, including [[metaphysics]], [[epistemology]], [[Political Philosophy|political philosophy]], [[ethics]], [[Philosophy of Mind|philosophy of mind]], and [[Philosophy of Science|philosophy of science]]. His friends posthumously published his works, captivating philosophers for the next two centuries. Spinoza is celebrated as one of the most original and influential thinkers of the seventeenth century. [[Rebecca Goldstein]] dubbed him "the renegade Jew who gave us modernity".{{sfn|Goldstein|2006|p=i}}

{{toclimit|3}}

==Biography==
[[File: Mozes en Aaronkerk 1.jpg|thumb|200px|The [[Mozes en Aäronkerk|Moses and Aaron Church]] now stands at the site of Spinoza's childhood home.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=115}}]]

===Family background===
{{see also|History of the Jews in Amsterdam}}

Spinoza's ancestors, adherents of [[Crypto-Judaism]], faced persecution during the [[Portuguese Inquisition]], enduring torture and public displays of humiliation. In 1597, his paternal grandfather's family left [[Vidigueira]] for [[Nantes]] and lived outwardly as [[New Christians]],{{sfn|Israel|2023|pp=85-87}} eventually transferring to Holland for an unknown reason.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=134}} His maternal ancestors were a leading [[Porto]] commercial family,{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=88}} and his maternal grandfather was a foremost merchant who drifted between Judaism and Christianity.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=299}} Spinoza was raised by his grandmother from ages six to nine and probably learned much about his family history from her.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=124}}

Spinoza's father Michael was a prominent and wealthy merchant in Amsterdam with a business that had wide geographical reach.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=158}} In 1649, he was elected to serve as an administrative officer of the recently united congregation [[Portuguese Synagogue (Amsterdam)|Talmud Torah]].{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=144}} He married his cousin Rachael d'Espinosa, daughter of his uncle Abraham d'Espinosa, who was also a community leader and Michael's business partner.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=140}} Marrying cousins was common in the Portuguese Jewish community then, giving Michael access to his father-in-law's commercial network and capital.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=140-41}} Rachel's children died in infancy, and she died in 1627.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=38}}{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=140-41}}

After the death of Rachel, Michael married Hannah Deborah, with whom he had five children. His second wife brought a dowry to the marriage that was absorbed into Michael's business capital instead of being set aside for her children, which may have caused a grudge between Spinoza and his father.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=183}} The family lived on the artificial island on the south side of the River Amstel, known as the [[Vlooienburg]], at the fifth house along the [[Houtgracht]] canal.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=115}} The Jewish quarter was not formally divided. The family lived close to the Bet Ya'acov synagogue, and nearby were Christians, including the artist [[Rembrandt]].{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=117}} Miriam was their first child, followed by Isaac who was expected to take over as head of the family and the commercial enterprise but died in 1649.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=183}} '''Baruch Espinosa''', the third child, was born on 24 November 1632 and named as per tradition for his maternal grandfather.{{sfn|Nadler|1999|p=45}}

Spinoza's younger brother Gabriel was born in 1634, followed by another sister Rebecca. Miriam married [[Caceres family|Samuel de Caceres]] but died shortly after childbirth. According to Jewish practice, Samuel had to marry his former sister-in-law Rebecca.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=185}} Following his brother's death, Spinoza's place as head of the family and its business meant scholarly ambitions were pushed aside.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=158}} Spinoza's mother, Hannah Deborah, died when Spinoza was six years old. Michael's third wife, Esther, raised Spinoza from age nine; she lacked formal Jewish knowledge due to growing up a New Christian and only spoke Portuguese at home. The marriage was childless.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=145-46}} Spinoza's sister Rebecca, brother Gabriel, and nephew eventually migrated to [[History of the Jews in Curaçao|Curaçao]], and the remaining family joined them after Spinoza's death.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=185}}

====Uriel da Costa's early influence====
[[File:Dacosta und Spinoza.jpg|left|thumb|240x240px|[[Samuel Hirszenberg]]'s imagined scene of Uriel da Costa instructing Spinoza (1901)]]
Through his mother, Spinoza was related to the philosopher [[Uriel da Costa]], who stirred controversy in Amsterdam's Portuguese Jewish community.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=159}} Da Costa questioned traditional Christian and Jewish beliefs, asserting that, for example, their origins were based on human inventions instead of God's revelation. His clashes with the religious establishment led to his excommunication twice by rabbinic authorities, who imposed humiliation and social exclusion.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=160}} In 1639, as part of an agreement to be readmitted, da Costa had to prostrate himself for worshippers to step over him. He died in 1640, reportedly committing suicide.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=161}}

During his childhood, Spinoza was likely unaware of his family connection with Uriel da Costa; still, as a teenager, he certainly heard discussions about him.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=90}} [[Steven Nadler]] explains that, although da Costa died when Spinoza was eight, his ideas shaped Spinoza's intellectual development. Amsterdam's Jewish communities long remembered and discussed da Costa's skepticism about organized religion, denial of the soul's immortality, and the idea that Moses didn't write the Torah, influencing Spinoza's intellectual journey.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=84}}

===School days and the family business===
[[File:Baruch Espinosa crossed out from pupil list, Ets Haim, Amsterdam, 17th century.jpeg|thumb|Spinoza's name crossed out on the list of pupils of Talmud Torah]]
Spinoza attended the Talmud Torah school adjoining the Bet Ya'acov synagogue, a few doors down from his home, headed by the senior Rabbi [[Saul Levi Morteira]].{{sfn|Israel|2023|pp=148–49}}{{sfn|Nadler|1999|pp=65–66}} Instructed in Spanish, the language of learning and literature, students in the elementary school learned to read the prayerbook and the [[Torah]] in Hebrew, translate the weekly section into Spanish, and study [[Rashi]]'s commentary.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|pp=72-75}} Spinoza's name does not appear on the registry after age fourteen, and he likely never studied with rabbis such as [[Manasseh ben Israel]] and Morteira. Spinoza possibly went to work around fourteen and almost certainly was needed in his father's business after his brother died in 1649.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=93}}

During the [[First Anglo-Dutch War]], much of the Spinoza firm's ships and cargo were captured by [[Commonwealth of England|English]] ships, severely affecting the firm's financial viability. The firm was saddled with debt by the war's end in 1654 due to its merchant voyages being intercepted by the English, leading to its decline.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|pp=100-101}}{{sfn|Israel|2023|pp=206}} Spinoza's father died in 1654, making him the head of the family, responsible for organizing and leading the Jewish mourning rituals, and in a business partnership with his brother of their inherited firm.{{sfn|Israel|2023|pp=204-05}} As Spinoza's father had poor health for some years before his death, he was significantly involved in the business, putting his intellectual curiosity on hold.{{sfn|Israel|2023|pp=205-06}} Until 1656, he continued financially supporting the synagogue and attending services in compliance with synagogue conventions and practice.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=210}} By 1655, the family's wealth had evaporated and the business effectively ended.{{sfn|Israel|2023|pp=205-06}}

In March 1656, Spinoza went to the city authorities for protection against debts in the Portuguese Jewish community. To free himself from the responsibility of paying debts owed by his late father, Spinoza appealed to the city to declare him an orphan;{{sfn|Nadler|2001a|p=25}} since he was a legal minor, not understanding his father's indebtedness would remove the obligation to repay his debts and retrospectively renounce his inheritance.{{sfn|Israel|2023|pp=220-22}} Though he was released of all debts and legally in the right, his reputation as a merchant was permanently damaged in addition to violating a synagogue regulation that business matters are to be arbitrated within the community.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=222}}{{sfn|Nadler|2001a|p=25}}

===Expulsion from the Jewish community===
[[File:Hirszenberg, Spinoza wyklêty (Excommunicated Spinoza), 1907.jpg|thumb|''Excommunicated Spinoza'' by [[Samuel Hirszenberg]] (1907), the second of his two modern paintings imagining scenes of Spinoza's life]]

Amsterdam was tolerant of religious diversity so long as it was practiced discreetly. The community was concerned with protecting its reputation and not associating with Spinoza lest his controversial views provide the basis for possible persecution or expulsion.{{sfn|Nadler|2001a|pp=17–22}} Spinoza did not openly break with Jewish authorities until his father died in 1654 when he became public and defiant, resulting from lengthy and stressful religious, financial, and legal clashes involving his business and synagogue, such as when Spinoza violated synagogue regulations by going to city authorities rather than resolving his disputes within the community to free himself from paying his father's debt.{{sfn|Nadler|2001a|p=25}}

On 27 July 1656, the Talmud Torah community leaders, which included [[Isaac Aboab da Fonseca|Aboab de Fonseca]],{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=74}} issued a writ of ''[[Herem (censure)|herem]]'' against the 23-year-old Spinoza.{{sfn|Scruton|2002|p=21}}{{sfn|Touber|2018|p=45}} Spinoza's censure was the harshest ever pronounced in the community, carrying tremendous emotional and spiritual impact.{{sfn|Nadler|2001a|pp=2-7}} The exact reason for expelling Spinoza is not stated, only referring to his "abominable heresies", "monstrous deeds", and the testimony of witnesses "in the presence of the said Espinoza".{{sfn|Smith|2003|p=xx}} Even though the Amsterdam municipal authorities were not directly involved in Spinoza's censure, the town council expressly ordered the Portuguese-Jewish community to regulate their conduct and ensure that the community kept strict observance of Jewish law.{{sfn|Nadler|2001a|p=19}} Other evidence indicates a concern about upsetting civil authorities, such as the synagogue's bans on public weddings, funeral processions, and discussing religious matters with Christians, lest such activity might "disturb the liberty we enjoy".{{sfn|Nadler|2001a|p=20}}

[[File:Ban of Baruch Spinoza, Amsterdam, 27 July 1656, 6 Av 5416.jpg|thumb|Text of Spinoza's expulsion on 6 Av 5416 (27 July 1656)]]
Before the expulsion, Spinoza had not published anything or written a treatise; [[Steven Nadler]] states that if Spinoza was voicing his criticism of Judaism that later appeared through his philosophical works, such as Part I of [[Ethics (Spinoza book)|''Ethics'']], then there can be no wonder that he was severely punished.{{sfn|Nadler|2001a|p=16}}{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=160}} Unlike most censures issued by the Amsterdam congregation, it was never rescinded since the censure did not lead to repentance. After the censure, Spinoza may have written an [[Apologia]] in Spanish defending his views, but it is now lost.{{sfn|Scruton|2002|p=22}} Spinoza's expulsion did not lead him to convert to Christianity or belong to a confessional religion or sect.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=338}} From 1656 to 1661, Spinoza found lodgings elsewhere in Amsterdam and Leiden, supporting himself with teaching while learning lens grinding and constructing microscopes and telescopes.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=243}} Spinoza did not maintain a sense of Jewish identity; he argued that without adherence to Jewish law, the Jewish people lacked a sustaining source of difference and identity, rendering the notion of a secular Jew incoherent.{{sfn|Nadler|2011|p=167}}

===Education and study group===
Sometime between 1654 and 1657, Spinoza started studying Latin with political radical [[Franciscus van den Enden]], a former [[Jesuit]] and atheist, who likely introduced Spinoza to scholastic and modern philosophy, including Descartes, who had a dominant influence on Spinoza's philosophy.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|pp=129-30}} While boarding with Van den Enden, Spinoza studied in his school, where he learned the arts and sciences and likely taught others.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|pp=125-26}}{{sfn|Israel|2023|pp=229-30}} Many of his friends were either secularized freethinkers or belonged to dissident Christian groups that rejected the authority of established churches and traditional dogmas.{{sfn|Israel|2023|pp=342}}{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=164}} Spinoza was acquainted with members of the [[Collegiants]], a group of disaffected [[Mennonite]]s and other dissenting Reformed sects that shunned official theology and must have played some role in Spinoza's developing views on religion and directed him to Van Enden.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=168}} [[Jonathan Israel]] conjectures that another possible influential figure was atheist translator [[Jan Hendriksz Glazemaker]], a collaborator of Spinoza's friend and publisher Rieuwertsz, who could not have mentored Spinoza but was in a unique position to introduce Spinoza to Cartesian philosophy, mathematics, and lens grinding.{{sfn|Israel|2023|pp=338-39}}

After learning Latin with Van Enden, Spinoza studied at [[Leiden University]] around 1658,{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=184}} where he audited classes in Cartesian philosophy.{{efn|[[Steven Nadler]] speculates that Spinoza Latinized his name at Leiden because all instruction was in Latin.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=193}}}} From 1656 to 1661, Spinoza's main discussion partners who formed his circle and played a formative part in Spinoza's life were Van den Enden, {{ill|Pieter Balling|nl||it}}, Jarig Jelles, [[Lodewijk Meyer]], [[Johannes Bouwmeester]] and [[Adriaan Koerbagh]].{{sfn|Israel|2023|pp=333-38}} Spinoza's following, or philosophical sect,{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=322}} scrutinized the propositions of the ''Ethics'' while it was in draft and Spinoza's second text, ''Short Treatise on God, Man, and His Well-Being''.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=330}} Though a few prominent people in Amsterdam discussed the teachings of the secretive but marginal group, it was mainly a testing ground for Spinoza's philosophy to extend his challenge to the status quo.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=350}} Their public reputation in Amsterdam was negative, with [[Ole Borch]] disparaging them as "atheists".{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=344}} Throughout his life, Spinoza's general approach was to avoid intellectual battles, clashes, and public controversies, viewing them as a waste of energy that served no real purpose.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=343}}

===Career as a philosopher===
====Rijnsburg====
[[File: Spinoza museum Rijnsburg 2.jpg|thumb|Spinoza's lodging in Rijnsburg, now a museum]]
Between 1660 and 1661, Spinoza moved from Amsterdam to [[Rijnsburg]], allowing for a quiet retreat in the country and access to the university town, Leiden, where he still had many friends.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=214}} Around this time, he wrote his ''Short Treatise on God, Man, and His Well-Being'', which he never published in his lifetime, thinking it would enrage the theologians, synods, and city magistrates.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=456}}{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=225}} The ''Short Treatise'', a long-forgotten text that only survived in Dutch translation, was first published by [[Johannes van Vloten]] in 1862.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=330}} While lodging with Herman Homan in Rijnsburg, Spinoza produced lenses and instruments to support himself and out of scientific interest.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|pp=215-16}} He began working on his ''Ethics'' and ''Descartes' Principles of Philosophy'', which he completed in two weeks, communicating and interpreting Descartes' arguments and testing the water for his metaphysical and ethical ideas. Spinoza's explanations of essential elements of the Cartesian system helped many interested people study the system, enhancing his philosophical reputation. This work was published in 1663 and was one of the two works published in his lifetime under his name.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|pp=243-45}} Spinoza led a modest and frugal lifestyle, earning income by polishing lenses and crafting telescopes and microscopes.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=215}} He also relied on the generous contributions of his friends to support himself.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=305}}

====Voorburg====
In 1663, Spinoza moved to [[Voorburg]] for an unknown reason. He continued working on ''Ethics'' and corresponded with scientists and philosophers throughout Europe. In 1665,{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=264}} he began writing the ''Theological-Political Treatise'', which addresses theological and political issues such as the interpretation of scripture, the origins of the state, and the bounds of political and religious authority while arguing for a secular, democratic state.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=290}}{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=332}} Before the publication of the ''Theological-Political Treatise'', Spinoza's friend [[Adriaan Koerbagh]] published a book that criticized organized religion, denied the divine authorship of the Bible, and asserted that miracles were impossible—ideas similar to those of Spinoza.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|pp=309-11}} His work attracted the attention of the authorities, leading to his imprisonment and eventual death in prison. Anticipating the reaction to his ideas, Spinoza published his treatise in 1670 under a false publisher and a fictitious place of publication.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=314}} The work did not remain anonymous for long.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=339}} [[Samuel Maresius]] attacked Spinoza personally, while [[Thomas Hobbes]] and [[Johannes Bredenburg]] criticized his conception of God and saw the book as dangerous and subversive.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=343}} Spinoza's work was safer than Koerbagh's because it was written in Latin, a language not widely understood by the general public, and Spinoza explicitly forbade its translation.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=346}} The secular authorities varied enforcing the Reformed Church in Amsterdam's orders to ban the distribution of the blasphemous book.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=344}}

====The Hague====
[[File: Spinoza House, The Hague (2016) 01.png|thumb|Spinoza's house in The Hague, where he died]]
In 1670, Spinoza moved to [[The Hague]] to have easier access to the city's intellectual life and to be closer to his friends and followers.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=334}} As he became more famous, Spinoza spent time receiving visitors and responding to letters. He returned to the manuscript of&nbsp;''Ethics'', reworking part Three into parts Four and Five, and composed a Hebrew grammar for proper interpretation of scripture and for clearing up confusion and problems when studying the Bible, with part One presenting etymology, the alphabet, and principles governing nouns, verbs, and more. Part Two, unfinished before he died, would have presented syntax rules.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|pp=375-79}} Another unfinished work from 1676 was ''[[Tractatus Politicus]]'', which concerns how states can function well and intended to show that democratic states are best.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=399}} Spinoza refused an offer to be the chair of philosophy at the [[University of Heidelberg]], perhaps because of the possibility that it might curb his [[freedom of thought]].{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=363}}

====Correspondence====
{{See also|Epistolae (Spinoza)|List of Epistolae (Letters) of Spinoza}}
Few of Spinoza's letters are extant, and none before 1661.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=xiii}} Nearly all the contents are philosophical and technical because the original editors of ''Opera Posthuma''—a collection of his works published posthumously—Lodewijk Meyer, Georg Hermann Schuller, and Johannes Bouwmeester, excluded personal matters and letters due to the political and ecclesiastical persecution of the time.{{sfn|Shirley|2002|p=755}} Spinoza corresponded with [[Peter Serrarius]], a radical Protestant and [[Millenarianism|millenarian]] merchant, who was a patron of Spinoza after his expulsion from the Jewish community. He acted as an intermediary for Spinoza's correspondence, sending and receiving letters of the philosopher to and from third parties. They maintained their relationship until Serrarius died in 1669.{{sfn|Popkin|1999|p=381}}{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=296}}

[[File:Spinoza Letter to Leibniz.jpg|thumb|left|Letter from Spinoza to Leibniz, with his BdS seal]]
Through his pursuits in lens grinding, mathematics, optics, and philosophy, Spinoza forged connections with prominent figures such as scientist [[Christiaan Huygens]], mathematician [[Johannes Hudde]], and Secretary of the [[British Royal Society]] [[Henry Oldenburg]]. Huygens and others notably praised the quality of Spinoza's lenses.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|pp=259-61}} Spinoza engaged in correspondence with [[Willem van Blijenbergh]], an amateur [[Calvinism|Calvinist]] theologian, who sought Spinoza's view on the nature of evil and sin. Whereas Blijenbergh deferred to the authority of scripture for theology and philosophy, Spinoza told him not solely to look at scripture for truth or anthropomorphize God. Also, Spinoza told him their views were incommensurable.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|pp=252-54}} [[Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz]] outwardly described Spinoza's work negatively but privately wrote letters to him and desired to examine the manuscript of the ''Ethics''.{{sfn|Stewart|2006|pp=11-12}} In 1676, Leibniz traveled to The Hague to meet Spinoza, remaining with him for three days to converse about current events and philosophy.{{sfn|Stewart|2006|pp=14-15}} Leibniz's work bears some striking resemblances to parts of Spinoza's philosophy, like in [[Monadology]]. Leibniz was concerned when his name was not redacted in a letter printed in the ''Opera Posthuma''.{{sfn|Buruma|2024|pp=166-67}} In 1675, Albert Burgh, a friend and possibly former pupil of Spinoza, wrote to him repudiating his teachings and announcing his conversion to the Catholic Church. Burgh attacked Spinoza's views as expressed in the ''Theological-Political Treatise'' and tried to persuade Spinoza to embrace Catholicism. In response, Spinoza, at the request of Burgh's family, who hoped to restore his reason, wrote an angry letter mocking the Catholic Church and condemning all religious superstition.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|pp=390-93}}

Spinoza published little in his lifetime, and most formal writings were in Latin, reaching few readers. Apart from ''Descartes' Principles of Philosophy'' and the ''Theologico-Political Treatise'', his works appeared in print after his death. Because the reaction to his anonymously published work, ''Theologico-Political Treatise'', was unfavorable, Spinoza told supporters not to translate his works and abstained from publishing further.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=346}}{{sfn|Stewart|2006|p=106}} Following his death, his supporters published his works posthumously in Latin and Dutch. His posthumous works–''Opera Posthuma''–were edited by his friends in secrecy to prevent the confiscation and destruction of manuscripts.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=22}} He wore a [[signet ring]] to mark his letters, engraved with the Latin word ''Caute'', meaning "Caution", and the image of a thorny rose.{{sfn|Stewart|2006|p=106}}

====Death and rescue of unpublished writings====
[[File:Den Haag - Nieuwe Kerk - Burial Monument to Benedictus de Spinoza - Baruch de Spinoza - Benedict de Spinoza - Benedito de Espinosa.jpg|thumb|Spinoza's memorial plaque in the churchyard of the [[Nieuwe Kerk (The Hague)|Nieuwe Kerk]]. When he was buried, no tombstone or plaque was prepared. His vault was close to [[Johan de Witt]]'s remains.]]
Spinoza's health began to fail in 1676, and he died in The Hague on 21 February 1677 at age 44, attended by a physician friend, Georg Herman Schuller. Spinoza had been ill with some form of lung affliction, probably [[tuberculosis]] and possibly complicated by [[silicosis]] brought on by grinding glass lenses.{{sfn|Gullan-Whur|1998|pp=317-18}} Although Spinoza had been becoming sicker for weeks, his death was sudden, and he died without leaving a will.{{sfn|Israel|2023|pp=1150-1151}}{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=406}} Reports circulated that he repented his philosophical stances on his deathbed, but these tales petered out in the 18th century. Lutheran preacher Johannes Colerus wrote the first biography of Spinoza for the original reason of researching his final days.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=1155}}

Spinoza was buried inside the [[Nieuwe Kerk (The Hague)|Nieuwe Kerk]] four days after his death, with six others in the same vault. At the time, there was no memorial plaque for Spinoza. In the 18th century, the vault was emptied, and the remnants scattered over the earth of the churchyard. The memorial plaque is outside the church, where some of his remains are part of the churchyard's soil.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=1158}} Spinoza's friends rescued his personal belongings, papers, and unpublished manuscripts. His supporters took them away for safekeeping from seizure by those wishing to suppress his writings, and they do not appear in the inventory of his possessions at death. Within a year of his death, his supporters translated his Latin manuscripts into Dutch and other languages.{{sfn|Nadler|2018|p=409}} Secular authorities and later the Roman Catholic Church banned his works.{{sfn|Israel|1996|p=3}}{{sfn|Totaro|2015|pp=321-22}}

==Philosophy==
===''Ethics''===
[[File:Benedictus de Spinoza cover portrait.jpg|thumb|Engraving of Spinoza, captioned in Latin, "A Jew and an atheist"; he vehemently denied being an atheist.]]
{{Main|Ethics (Spinoza book)}}
Spinoza considered ''The Ethics'' his chief project and philosophical legacy.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=507}} The work has been associated with that of [[Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz|Leibniz]] and [[René Descartes]] as part of the [[Rationalism|rationalist]] school of thought,<ref>{{cite web |last=Montanarelli |first=Lisa |title=Spinoza stymies 'God's attorney' / Stewart argues the secular world was at stake in Leibniz face off |url=https://www.sfgate.com/books/article/spinoza-stymies-god-s-attorney-stewart-argues-2543764.php |website=SFGate |date=8 January 2006 |access-date=20 March 2024}}</ref> which includes the assumption that ideas correspond to reality perfectly, in the same way that mathematics is supposed to be an exact representation of the world. The ''Ethics'', a "superbly cryptic masterwork", contains many unresolved obscurities and is written with a forbidding mathematical structure modeled on Euclid's geometry. The writings of [[René Descartes]] have been described as "Spinoza's starting point".<ref name=tws9912>{{cite news
| first=Harold |last=Bloom|author-link=Harold Bloom
| title = Deciphering Spinoza, the Great Original – Book review of ''Betraying Spinoza. The Renegade Jew Who Gave Us Modernity'' by Rebecca Goldstein
|work=The New York Times
| date = 16 June 2006
| url = https://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/16/arts/16iht-idside17.1986759.html
| access-date =8 September 2009
}}</ref> Spinoza's first publication was his 1663 geometric exposition of proofs using [[Euclid]]'s model with definitions and axioms of Descartes's ''[[Principles of Philosophy]]''. Following Descartes, Spinoza aimed to understand truth through logical deductions from 'clear and distinct ideas', a process which always begins from the 'self-evident truths' of [[axiom]]s.{{sfn|Scruton|2002|pages=31–32}} However, his actual project does not end there: from his first work to his last, there runs a thread of "attending to the highest good" (which also is the highest truth) and thereby achieving a state of peace and harmony, either metaphysically or politically. In this light, the Principles of Philosophy might be viewed as an "exercise in geometric method and philosophy", paving the way for numerous concepts and conclusions that would define his philosophy (see Cogitata Metaphysica).{{sfn|Shirley|2002|p=109}}

====Metaphysics====
Spinoza's [[metaphysics]] consists of one thing, substance, and its modifications (modes). Early in ''The Ethics'' Spinoza argues that only one substance is absolutely [[Infinity|infinite]], self-caused, and eternal. He calls this substance "[[God]]", or "[[Nature]]". He takes these two terms to be [[synonymous]] (in the [[Latin]] the phrase he uses is ''"Deus sive Natura"''). For Spinoza, the whole of the [[natural]] [[universe]] consists of one substance, God, or, what is the same, Nature, and its modifications (modes).
{{blockquote|It cannot be overemphasized how the rest of Spinoza's philosophy—his philosophy of mind, his epistemology, his psychology, his moral philosophy, his political philosophy, and his philosophy of religion—flows more or less directly from the metaphysical underpinnings in Part I of the ''Ethics''.{{sfn|Della Rocca|2008|p=33}}}}

=====Substance, attributes, and modes=====
{{Blockquote|Spinoza sets forth a vision of Being, illuminated by his awareness of God. They may seem strange at first sight. To the question "What is?" he replies: "Substance, its attributes, and modes".|[[Karl Jaspers]]{{sfn|Jaspers|1974|p=9}}}}

Following [[Maimonides]], Spinoza defined [[Substance theory|substance]] as "that which is in itself and is conceived through itself", meaning that it can be understood without any reference to anything external.<ref name=Scruton41>{{harvnb|Scruton|2002|page=41}}</ref> Being conceptually independent also means that the same thing is [[Ontology|ontologically]] independent, depending on nothing else for its existence and being the 'cause of itself' (''causa sui'').<ref name=Scruton41 /> A mode is something which cannot exist independently but rather must do so as part of something else on which it depends, including properties (for example color), relations (such as size) and individual things.<ref name=Scruton42>{{harvnb|Scruton|2002|page=42}}</ref> Modes can be further divided into 'finite' and 'infinite' ones, with the latter being evident in every finite mode (he gives examples of "motion" and "rest").{{sfn|Scruton|2002|page=43}} The traditional understanding of an [[Property (philosophy)|attribute]] in philosophy is similar to Spinoza's modes, though he uses that word differently.<ref name=Scruton42 /> To him, an attribute is "that which the intellect perceives as constituting the essence of substance", and there are possibly an infinite number of them.{{sfn|Scruton|2002|page=44}} It is the essential nature that is "attributed" to reality by intellect.{{sfn|Scruton|2002|page=45}}
[[File:Portrait of a man, thought to be Baruch de Spinoza, attributed to Barend Graat.jpg|thumb|180px|Probable portrait of Spinoza, by [[Barend Graat]], 1666]]

Spinoza defined [[God]] as "a substance consisting of infinite attributes, each of which expresses eternal and infinite essence", and since "no cause or reason" can prevent such a being from existing, it must exist.{{sfn|Scruton|2002|page=45}} This is a form of the [[ontological argument]], which is claimed to prove the existence of God, but Spinoza went further in stating that it showed that only God exists.<ref name=Scruton38>{{harvnb|Scruton|2002|page=38}}</ref> Accordingly, he stated that "Whatever is, is in God, and nothing can exist or be conceived without God".<ref name=Scruton38 />{{sfn|Lin|2007|p=273}} This means that God is identical with the universe, an idea which he encapsulated in the phrase "''Deus sive Natura''" ('God or Nature'), which some have interpreted as [[atheism]] or [[pantheism]].{{sfn|Scruton|2002|page=51}} God can be known by humans through either the attribute of extension or the attribute of thought, though there are many more such attributes.{{sfn|Scruton|2002|page=57}} Thought and extension represent giving complete accounts of the world in mental or physical terms.{{sfn|Scruton|2002|page=59}} To this end, he says that "the mind and the body are one and the same thing, which is conceived now under the attribute of thought, now under the attribute of extension".{{sfn|Scruton|2002|p=60}}

After stating his proof for God's existence, Spinoza addresses who "God" is. Spinoza believed that God is "the sum of the natural and physical laws of the universe and certainly not an individual entity or creator".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Cannon |first=J. A |date=2009-05-17 |title=World in time of upheaval: Sources of enlightenment |newspaper=[[Deseret News]]}}</ref> Spinoza attempts to prove that God is just the substance of the universe by first stating that substances do not share attributes or essences and then demonstrating that God is a "substance" with an infinite number of attributes, thus the attributes possessed by any other substances must also be possessed by God. Therefore, God is just the sum of all the substances of the universe. God is the only substance in the universe, and everything is a part of God. This view was described by [[Charles Hartshorne]] as [[Classical Pantheism]].<ref name="auto4">{{cite book |first1=Charles |last1=Hartshorne |first2=William |last2=Reese |title=Philosophers Speak of God |publisher=Humanity Books |date=1953 |at=Chapter 4 |oclc=375220}}</ref>

Spinoza argues that "things could not have been produced by God in any other way or in any other order than is the case".<ref>{{Cite book |first=Baruch |last=Spinoza |chapter=Ethics |title=Spinoza: Complete Works |translator-first=Samuel |translator-last=Shirley |editor-first=Michael L. |editor-last=Morgan |location=Indianapolis |publisher=Hackett Publishing |date=2002|at=Part I, Proposition 33}}</ref> Therefore, concepts such as 'freedom' and 'chance' have little meaning.{{sfn|Scruton|2002|page=51}} This picture of Spinoza's determinism is illuminated in ''Ethics'': "the infant believes that it is by free will that it seeks the breast; the angry boy believes that by free will he wishes vengeance; the timid man thinks it is with free will he seeks flight; the drunkard believes that by a free command of his mind he speaks the things which when sober he wishes he had left unsaid.&nbsp;... All believe that they speak by a free command of the mind, whilst, in truth, they have no power to restrain the impulse which they have to speak."{{sfn|Curley|1996|p=73}} In his letter to G. H. Schuller (Letter 58), he wrote: "men are conscious of their desire and unaware of the causes by which [their desires] are determined."<ref>''Ethics'', Pt. I, Appendix: "[M]en think themselves free inasmuch as they are conscious of their volitions and desires, and never even dream, in their ignorance, of the causes which have disposed of them so to wish and desire."</ref> He also held that knowledge of true causes of passive emotion can transform it into an active emotion, thus anticipating one of the key ideas of [[Sigmund Freud]]'s [[psychoanalysis]].{{sfn|Scruton|2002|p=86}}

According to [[Eric Schliesser]], Spinoza was skeptical regarding the possibility of knowledge of nature and as a consequence at odds with scientists such as Galileo and Huygens.<ref>{{cite web |last=Schliesser |first=Eric |date=2012-07-09 |url=http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/9223/ |website=PhilSci-Archive |title=Spinoza and the Philosophy of Science: Mathematics, Motion, and Being}}</ref>

=====Causality=====
Although the [[principle of sufficient reason]] is commonly associated with [[Gottfried Leibniz]], Spinoza employs it in a more systematic manner. In Spinoza's philosophical framework, questions concerning why a particular phenomenon exists are always answerable, and these answers are provided in terms of the relevant cause. Spinoza's approach involves first providing an account of a phenomenon, such as goodness or consciousness, to explain it, and then further explaining the phenomenon in terms of itself. For instance, he might argue that consciousness is the degree of power of a mental state.{{sfn|Della Rocca|2008|p=30}}

Spinoza has also been described as an "[[Epicureanism|Epicurean]] materialist",<ref name="tws9912" /> specifically in reference to his opposition to Cartesian mind-body dualism. This view was held by Epicureans before him, as they believed that atoms with their probabilistic paths were the only substance that existed fundamentally.<ref name="Konstan">{{Cite SEP|last=Konstan|first=David|url-id=epicurus|title=Epicurus|date=July 8, 2022}}</ref>{{sfn|Curley|1996|p=118}} Spinoza, however, deviated significantly from Epicureans by adhering to strict determinism, much like the Stoics before him, in contrast to the Epicurean belief in the probabilistic path of atoms, which is more in line with contemporary thought on [[quantum mechanics]].<ref name="Konstan" /><ref>{{cite web |last=Archie |first=Lee C. |date=2006-07-12 |title=Baruch Spinoza, "Human Beings are Determined"|url=http://philosophy.lander.edu/intro/spinoza.shtml|access-date=21 February 2017|work=Philosophical Ethics}}</ref>

=====The emotions=====
One thing which seems, on the surface, to distinguish Spinoza's view of the emotions from both [[René Descartes|Descartes]]'s and [[David Hume|Hume's]] pictures of them is that he takes the emotions to be [[cognition|cognitive]] in some important respect. [[Jonathan Bennett (philosopher)|Jonathan Bennett]] claims that "Spinoza mainly saw emotions as caused by cognitions. [However] he did not say this clearly enough and sometimes lost sight of it entirely."{{sfn|Bennett|1984|p=276}}
Spinoza provides several demonstrations which purport to show truths about how human emotions work. The picture presented is, according to Bennett, "unflattering, coloured as it is by universal [[egoism]]".{{sfn|Bennett|1984|p=277}}

====Ethical philosophy====
Spinoza's notion of blessedness figures centrally in his ethical philosophy. Spinoza writes that blessedness (or salvation or freedom), "consists, namely, in a constant and eternal love of God, or in God's love for men.{{Sfn|Curley|1996|p=176}} Philosopher [[Jonathan Bennett (philosopher)|Jonathan Bennett]] interprets this as Spinoza wanting "'blessedness' to stand for the most elevated and desirable state one could possibly be in."{{sfn|Bennett|1984|p=371}} Understanding what is meant by "most elevated and desirable state" requires understanding Spinoza's notion of ''[[conatus]]'' (''striving'', but not necessarily with any [[teleology|teleological]] baggage){{citation needed|date=February 2024}} and that "perfection" refers not to (moral) value, but to completeness. Given that individuals are identified as mere modifications of the infinite Substance, it follows that no individual can ever be fully complete, i.e., perfect, or blessed. Absolute perfection, is, in Spinoza's thought, reserved solely for Substance. Nevertheless, modes can attain a lesser form of blessedness, namely, that of pure understanding of oneself as one really is, i.e., as a definite modification of Substance in a certain set of relationships with everything else in the universe. That this is what Spinoza has in mind can be seen at the end of the ''[[Ethics (Spinoza book)|Ethics]]'', in E5P24 and E5P25, where Spinoza makes two final key moves, unifying the metaphysical, epistemological, and ethical propositions he has developed over the course of the work. In E5P24, he links the understanding of particular things to the understanding of God, or Substance; in E5P25, the ''conatus'' of the mind is linked to the third kind of knowledge (''Intuition''). From here, it is a short step to the connection of Blessedness with the ''amor dei intellectualis'' ("intellectual love of God").{{citation needed|date=February 2024}}

===''Tractatus Theologico-Politicus'' (TTP)===
[[File:Spinoza Tractatus Theologico-Politicus.jpg|thumb]]
As the [[Second Anglo-Dutch War]] raged and Spinoza grew confident in the near completion of his ethical system, he shifted his intellectual focus from writing The ''Ethics'' to the urgent complexities of society, religion, war, and politics.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=506}} The [[Tractatus Theologico-Politicus]] explains the lessons of ancient Israelite history, the moral core of Jesus's teachings, and the purpose of God's commandments, all tailored to current Dutch politics. It relies on biblical commentary, interpretation, history, philology, philosophy, legal analysis, and more to make its points.{{sfn|Nadler|2011|p=20}}

The work was published in 1670 and immediately caused an uproar across Europe.{{sfn|Nadler|2011|pp=xi-xii}}{{sfn|Simkins|2014}} While ''Ethics'' is written for a narrow audience that the masses would not understand, the TTP audience includes theologians such as teachers on university faculties and religious leaders.{{sfn|Nadler|2011|p=22}}

===''Tractatus Politicus'' (Political Treatise) (TP)===
{{Main|Tractatus Politicus}}
[[File:Spinoza, Tractatus Politicus Titlepage.jpg|thumb|The title page of the ''Tractatus politicus'' in the ''Opera Posthuma'']]
This unfinished treatise in Latin expounds Spinoza's ideas about forms of government.

Spinoza maintained conventional views regarding women’s societal role. In his Political Treatise (TP), he concludes tersely on the final page that women were naturally subordinate to men—a condition he attributed to inherent differences rather than societal structures, dismissing institutional explanations for their subordination. Biographer [[Jonathan I. Israel]] remarked that his views on women were universal for the time.{{sfn|Israel|2023|p=895}}

==Pantheism==
{{see also|Pantheism controversy}}
Spinoza was considered to be an atheist because he used the word "God" [Deus] to signify a concept that was different from that of traditional Judeo-Christian monotheism. "Spinoza expressly denies personality and consciousness to God; he has neither intelligence, feeling, nor will; he does not act according to purpose, but everything follows necessarily from his nature, according to law&nbsp;...".<ref>{{Cite book |first=Frank |last=Thilly |title=A History of Philosophy |at=§47 |publisher=Holt & Co. |location=New York |date=1914 |oclc=9215046}}</ref> Thus, Spinoza's cool, indifferent God differs from the concept of an anthropomorphic, fatherly God who cares about humanity.

In 1785, [[Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi]] published a condemnation of Spinoza's pantheism, after [[Gotthold Ephraim Lessing|Gotthold Lessing]] was thought to have confessed on his deathbed to being a "Spinozist", which was the equivalent in his time of being called an [[atheist]]. Jacobi claimed that Spinoza's doctrine was pure materialism, because all Nature and God are said to be nothing but extended [[Substance theory|substance]]. This, for Jacobi, was the result of Enlightenment rationalism, and it would finally end in absolute atheism. [[Moses Mendelssohn]] disagreed with Jacobi, saying that there is no actual difference between [[theism]] and pantheism. The issue became a major intellectual and religious concern for European civilization at the time.
{{clear left}}
Spinoza's philosophy was attractive to late 18th-century Europeans because it provided an alternative to materialism, atheism, and deism. Three of Spinoza's ideas strongly appealed to them: the unity of all that exists, the regularity of all that happens, and the identity of spirit and nature.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Lange|first1=Frederick Albert|title=History of Materialism and Criticism of its Present Importance, Vol. II|date=1880|publisher=Houghton, Osgood, & Co.|location=Boston|page=[https://archive.org/details/historyofmateria02lang/page/147 147]|url=https://archive.org/details/historyofmateria02lang|access-date=11 November 2015}}</ref>
By 1879, Spinoza's pantheism was praised by many, but was considered by some to be alarming and dangerously inimical.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Tuttle |first=Joseph F. |contribution=Address |quote=The Pantheism of Spinoza Dr. Smith regarded as the most dangerous enemy of Christianity, and as he announced his conviction that it had gained the control of the schools, press and pulpit of the Old World, and was rapidly gaining the same control of the New, his alarm and indignation sometimes rose to the eloquence of genuine passion |title=Memorial of the Rev. Henry Smith, D.D., LL. D., professor of sacred rhetoric and pastoral theology : in Lane Theological Seminary : consisting of addresses on occasion of the anniversary of the seminary, May 8th, 1879, together with commemorative resolutions |location=Cincinnati |publisher=[[Lane Theological Seminary]] |date=8 May 1879 |page=26 |url=https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.hn592d&seq=30 |oclc=894190874}}</ref>

Spinoza's "God or Nature" (''Deus sive Natura'') provided a living, natural God, in contrast to [[Isaac Newton]]'s [[first cause argument]] and the dead mechanism of [[Julien Offray de La Mettrie]]'s (1709–1751) work, ''[[Man a Machine]]'' (''{{lang|fr|L'homme machine}})''. Coleridge and Shelley saw in Spinoza's philosophy a ''religion of nature''.<ref>{{cite newspaper |last=Gottlieb |first=Anthony |date=1999-07-18 |title=God Exists, Philosophically |url=https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/99/07/18/reviews/990718.18gottlit.html |department=Books |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=18 March 2024}}</ref> [[Novalis]] called him the "God-intoxicated man".<ref name=tws9912/><ref name=tws9902>{{cite news
| title = Spinoza, 'God-Intoxicated Man' : Three Books Which Mark the Three Hundredth Anniversary of the Philosopher's Birth
|work=[[The New York Times]]
| date = 20 November 1932
| url = http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F40A14F83A5513738DDDA90A94D9415B828FF1D3
| access-date =8 September 2009
| first=Percy
| last=Hutchison
}}</ref> Spinoza inspired the poet Shelley to write his essay "[[The Necessity of Atheism]]".<ref name=tws9912/>

It is a widespread belief that Spinoza equated God with the material universe. He has therefore been called the "prophet"<ref>Picton, J. Allanson, "Pantheism: Its Story and Significance", 1905.</ref> and "prince"<ref>Fraser, Alexander Campbell "Philosophy of Theism", William Blackwood and Sons, 1895, p. 163.</ref> and most eminent expounder of [[pantheism]]. More specifically, in a letter to Henry Oldenburg he states, "as to the view of certain people that I identify God with Nature (taken as a kind of mass or corporeal matter), they are quite mistaken".<ref>{{cite book |last=Spinoza |first=Benedict de |title=Correspondence of Benedict de Spinoza |publisher=Wilder Publications |date=2009 |isbn=978-1-60459-156-9 |at=letter 73}}</ref> For Spinoza, the universe (cosmos) is a ''mode'' under two ''attributes'' of Thought and [[Extension (metaphysics)|Extension]]. God has infinitely many other attributes that are not present in the world.

According to German philosopher [[Karl Jaspers]] (1883–1969), when Spinoza wrote ''{{lang|la|Deus sive Natura}}'' (Latin for 'God or Nature'), Spinoza meant God was ''natura naturans'' (nature doing what nature does; literally, 'nature naturing'), not ''natura naturata'' (nature already created; literally, 'nature natured'). Jaspers believed that Spinoza, in his philosophical system, did not mean to say that God and Nature are interchangeable terms, but rather that God's transcendence was attested by his infinitely many attributes, and that two attributes known by humans, namely Thought and Extension, signified God's immanence.<ref name="ts64">{{harvnb|Jaspers|1974|pp=14, 95}}</ref> Even God under the attributes of thought and extension cannot be identified strictly with our world. That world is, of course, "divisible"; it has parts. But Spinoza said, "No attribute of a substance can be truly conceived from which it follows that the substance can be divided", meaning that one cannot conceive an attribute in a way that leads to the division of the substance. He also said, "a substance which is absolutely infinite is indivisible" (Ethics, Part I, Propositions 12 and 13).<ref name="ts65">{{cite book |first=Genevieve |last=Lloyd |title=Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Spinoza and ''The Ethics'' |series=Routledge Philosophy Guidebooks |publisher=Routledge |edition=1st |date=1996 |isbn=978-0-415-10782-2 |page=40}}</ref> Following this logic, our world should be considered as a mode under two attributes of thought and extension. Therefore, according to Jaspers, the pantheist formula "One and All" would apply to Spinoza only if the "One" preserves its transcendence and the "All" were not interpreted as the totality of finite things.<ref name=ts64/>

[[Martial Guéroult]] (1891–1976) suggested the term [[panentheism]], rather than pantheism, to describe Spinoza's view of the relation between God and the world. The world is not God, but in a strong sense, "in" God. Not only do finite things have God as their cause; they cannot be conceived without God.<ref name=ts65/> However, American panentheist philosopher [[Charles Hartshorne]] (1897–2000) insisted on the term [[Classical Pantheism]] to describe Spinoza's view.<ref name="auto4"/>

According to the ''[[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]'', Spinoza's God is an "infinite intellect" (''Ethics'' 2p11c): all-knowing (2p3), and capable of loving both himself and us, insofar as we are part of his perfection (5p35c). And suppose the mark of a personal being is that it is one towards which we can entertain personal attitudes. In that case, we should note that Spinoza also recommends ''amor intellectualis dei'' (the intellectual love of God) as the supreme good for man (5p33). However, the matter is complex. Spinoza's God does not have free will (1p32c1), he does not have purposes or intentions (1 appendix), and Spinoza insists that "neither intellect nor will pertain to the nature of God" (1p17s1). Moreover, while we may love God, we need to remember that God is not a being who could ever love us back. "He who loves God cannot strive that God should love him in return", says Spinoza (5p19).<ref>{{Cite SEP|url-id=pantheism|title=Pantheism|last=Mander|first=William|date=August 17, 2023}}</ref>

[[Steven Nadler]] suggests that settling the question of Spinoza's atheism or pantheism depends on an analysis of attitudes. If pantheism is associated with religiosity, then Spinoza is not a pantheist, since Spinoza believes that the proper stance to take towards God is not one of reverence or religious awe, but instead one of objective study and reason, since taking the religious stance would leave one open to the possibility of error and superstition.<ref name="SEPNadler">{{Cite SEP|url-id=spinoza|title=Baruch Spinoza|first=Steven|last=Nadler|author-link=Steven Nadler|date=Nov 8, 2023}}</ref>

==Other philosophical connections==
Many authors have discussed similarities between Spinoza's philosophy and Eastern philosophical traditions. A few decades after the philosopher's death, [[Pierre Bayle]], in his famous ''[[Dictionnaire Historique et Critique|Historical and Critical Dictionary]]'' (1697) pointed out a link between Spinoza's alleged atheism with "the theology of a Chinese sect", supposedly called "Foe Kiao",<ref>{{cite book |first=Pierre |last=Bayle |author-link=Pierre Bayle |url=https://archive.org/details/dictionnairehis42unkngoog/page/96/mode/1up?view=theater |title=Dictionnaire Historique et Critique |volume=13 |language=fr |publisher=Libraire Desoer |location=Paris |date=1820 |page=416}}</ref> of which he had learned thanks to the testimonies of the Jesuit missions in Eastern Asia. A century later, [[Immanuel Kant|Kant]] also established a parallel between the philosophy of Spinoza and the thinking of [[Laozi]] (a "monstrous system" in his words), grouping both under the name of pantheists, criticizing what he described as mystical tendencies in them.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Immanuel |last=Kant |author-link=Immanuel Kant |url=https://bpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/voices.uchicago.edu/dist/f/106/files/2013/02/Kant-The-end-of-all-things.pdf |chapter=The end of all things |date=1996 |title=Religion and Rational Theology |translator1-first=Allen W. |translator1-last=Wood |translator2-first=George |translator2-last=Di Giovanni |publisher=Cambridge University Press |page=228}}</ref>

In 1863, [[Elijah Benamozegh]] purported to establish that the main source of Spinoza's ontology is Kabbalah.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Elijah |last=Benamozegh |title=Spinoza and Kabbalah |translator-first=Yehiel |translator-last=Davenne |location=Puyméras, France |publisher=Éditions localement transcendantes |date=2024 |isbn=978-2-383-66037-8}}</ref> The most recent research in the field seems to vindicate that claim.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Miquel |last=Beltrán |title=The Influence of Abraham Cohen de Herrera's Kabbalah on Spinoza's Metaphysics |location=Leiden |publisher=Brill |date=2016 |isbn=978-90-04-31567-9}}</ref>

The 19th-century German Sanskritist [[Theodor Goldstücker]] was one of the early figures to notice the similarities between Spinoza's religious conceptions and the [[Vedanta]] tradition of India, writing that Spinoza's thought was "...&nbsp;so exact a representation of the ideas of the Vedanta, that we might have suspected its founder to have borrowed the fundamental principles of his system from the Hindus, did his biography not satisfy us that he was wholly unacquainted with their doctrines&nbsp;...".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Goldstücker |first=Theodor |author-link=Theodor Goldstücker |title=Literary Remains of the Late Professor Theodore Goldstücker |publisher=W. H. Allen |date=1879 |page=32 |oclc=2452163}}</ref>{{sfn|The Westminster Review|1862|pp=256–257}} [[Max Müller]] also noted the striking similarities between Vedanta and the system of Spinoza, equating the [[Brahman]] in Vedanta to Spinoza's 'Substantia.'<ref>{{Cite book |title=Three Lectures on the Vedanta Philosophy |first=F. Max |last=Müller |author-link=Max Müller |publisher=Longmans, Green and Co. |date=1894 |page=[https://archive.org/details/threelecturesonv00mlrich/page/122/mode/2up 123] |oclc=458768785}}</ref>

==Legacy==
[[File:250ste sterfdag filosoof Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677), objectnr PB 767.tif|thumb|250px|A Dutch commemorative medal issued on the 250th [[death anniversary]] of Spinoza, 1927]] 
Spinoza's ideas have had a major impact on intellectual debates from the seventeenth century to the current era. How Spinoza is viewed has gone from the atheistic author of treatises that undermine Judaism and organized religion, to a cultural hero, the first secular Jew.<ref name="Yovel-Tikkun">{{cite journal |url=https://embed.documentcloud.org/documents/2892249-5-1-15-Spinoza-the-First-Secular-Jew/ | title=Spinoza, the First Secular Jew? |first=Yirmiyahu |last=Yovel |date=1990 |work=[[Tikkun (magazine)|Tikkun]] |volume=5 |number=1 |pages=40-42, 94-96}}</ref> One writer contends that what draws readers to Spinoza today and "makes him perhaps the most beloved philosopher since Socrates, is his confident equanimity". He is not a despairing [[nihilist]], but rather Spinoza says that "blessedness is nothing else but the contentment of spirit, which arises from the intuitive knowledge of God."<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Kirsch |first=Adam |author-link=Adam Kirsch |date=12–19 February 2024 |title=The Reticent Radical |work=[[The New Yorker]] |page=92}}</ref> One of his biographers, [[Jonathan I. Israel]], argues that "No leading figure of the post-1750 later Enlightenment, for example, or the nineteenth century, was engaged with the philosophy of Descartes, Hobbes, Bayle, Locke, or Leibniz, to the degree leading figures such as [[Gotthold Ephraim Lessing|Lessing]], Goethe, Kant, Hegel, Fichte, Schelling, Heine, [[George Eliot]], and Nietzsche, remained preoccupied throughout their creative lives with Spinoza."{{sfn|Israel|2023|pp=1205}} [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel|Hegel]] (1770–1831) asserts that "The fact is that Spinoza is made a testing-point in modern philosophy, so that it may really be said: You are either a Spinozist or not a philosopher at all."<ref name="Hegel's History of Philosophy">{{cite book |last=Westphal |first=Merold |author-link=Merold Westphal |chapter=Chapter 8 : Hegel Between Spinoza and Derrida |title= Hegel's History of Philosophy: New Interpretations |publisher=[[SUNY Press]] |year= 2003 |editor-first= David A. |editor-last= Duquette |series= SUNY Series in Hegelian Studies |p=144 |isbn=978-1-4175-2035-0}}</ref>

His expulsion from the Portuguese synagogue in 1656 has stirred debate over the years on whether he is the "first modern Jew". Spinoza influenced discussions of the so-called [[Jewish question]], the examination of the idea of Judaism and the modern, secular Jew. [[Moses Mendelsohn]], Lessing, [[Heinrich Heine|Heine]], and [[Emmanuel Kant|Kant]], as well as subsequent thinkers, including [[Karl Marx|Marx]], [[Friedrich Nietzsche|Nietzsche]], and [[Sigmund Freud|Freud]] were influenced by Spinoza.{{sfn|Smith|1997|p=168-69}} The changing conception of Spinoza as "the First Modern Jew" has been explicitly explored by various authors.<ref name="Yovel-Tikkun"/><ref>{{Cite book |last=Goetschel |first=Willi |title=Spinoza's Modernity: Mendelssohn, Lessing, and Heine |location=Madison |publisher=University of Wisconsin Press |date=2004 |isbn=978-0-299-19083-5}}</ref>{{Sfn|Schwartz|2012}} His expulsion has been revisited in the 21st century, with Jewish writers such [[Berthold Auerbach]]; [[Solomon Rubin|Salomon Rubin]], who translated Spinoza's ''Ethics'' into Hebrew and saw Spinoza as a new Maimonides, penning "a new guide to the perplexed"; [[Zionist]] [[Yosef Klausner]], and fiction-writer [[Isaac Bashevis Singer]] shaping his image.{{Sfn|Schwartz|2012}}

In 1886, the young [[George Santayana]] published "The Ethical Doctrine of Spinoza", in ''[[The Harvard Monthly]]''.<ref>{{Cite magazine |first=George |last=Santayana |title=The Ethical Doctrine of Spinoza |work=[[The Harvard Monthly]] |volume=2 |date=June 1886 |pages=144–152}}</ref> Much later, he wrote an introduction to ''Spinoza's Ethics'' and ''"De Intellectus Emendatione"''.<ref>{{Cite book |contributor-first=George |contributor-last=Santayana |contribution=Introduction |first=Benedictus de |last=Spinoza |title=Spinoza's Ethics and "De intellectus emendatione" |translator-first=Andre |translator-last=Boyle |location=London |publisher=Dent |date=1910 |pages=vii–xxii}}</ref> In 1932, Santayana was invited to present an essay (published as "Ultimate Religion")<ref>{{Cite book |first=George |last=Santayana |chapter=Ultimate Religion |title=Obiter Scripta |editor1-first=Justus |editor1-last=Buchler |editor2-first=Benjamin |editor2-last=Schwartz |location=New York and London |publisher=Charles Scribner's Sons |date=1936 |pages=280–297}}</ref> at a meeting at [[The Hague]] celebrating the tricentennial of Spinoza's birth. In Santayana's autobiography, he characterized Spinoza as his "master and model" in understanding the naturalistic basis of morality.<ref>{{Cite book |first=George |last=Santayana |title=Persons and Places : the background of my life |location=Cambridge, Massachusetts |publisher=MIT Press |date=1986 |pages=233–236 |isbn=978-0-262-19238-5}}</ref>

Philosopher [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] evoked Spinoza with the title (suggested to him by [[G. E. Moore]]) of the English translation of his first definitive philosophical work, ''[[Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus]]'', an allusion to Spinoza's ''[[Tractatus Theologico-Politicus]]''. Elsewhere, Wittgenstein deliberately borrowed the expression ''[[sub specie aeternitatis]]'' from Spinoza (''Notebooks, 1914–16'', p.&nbsp;83). The structure of his ''Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus'' does have some structural affinities with Spinoza's ''Ethics'' (though, admittedly, not with the Spinoza's ''Tractatus'') in erecting complex philosophical arguments upon basic logical propositions and principles. In propositions 6.4311 and 6.45 he alludes to a Spinozian understanding of eternity and interpretation of the religious concept of eternal life, contending, "If by eternity is understood not eternal temporal duration, but timelessness, then he lives eternally who lives in the present." (6.4311) "The contemplation of the world ''sub specie aeterni'' is its contemplation as a limited whole." (6.45)

Spinoza's philosophy played an important role in the development of [[French philosophy|post-war French philosophy]]. Many of these philosophers "used Spinoza to erect a bulwark against the nominally irrationalist tendencies of phenomenology", which was associated with the dominance of [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel|Hegel]], [[Martin Heidegger]], and [[Edmund Husserl]] in France at that time.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Peden |first=Knox |title=Spinoza contra phenomenology : French rationalism from Cavaillès to Deleuze |date=2014 |isbn=978-0-8047-9136-6 |location=Stanford, California |publisher=Stanford University Press |oclc=880877889}}</ref> [[Louis Althusser]], as well as his colleagues such as [[Étienne Balibar]], saw in Spinoza a philosophy which could lead Marxism out of what they considered to be flaws in its original formulation, particularly its reliance upon Hegel's conception of the [[dialectic]], as well as Spinoza's concept of immanent causality. [[Antonio Negri]], in exile in France for much of this period, also wrote a number of books on Spinoza, most notably ''The Savage Anomaly'' (1981) in his own reconfiguration of Italian [[Autonomia Operaia]]. Other notable French scholars of Spinoza in this period included [[Alexandre Matheron]], [[Martial Gueroult]], [[André Tosel]], and [[Pierre Macherey]], the last of whom published a widely read and influential five-volume commentary on Spinoza's ''Ethics'', which has been described as "a monument of Spinoza commentary".<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Baugh |first=Bruce |date=28 March 2015 |title=Spinoza Contra Phenomenology: French Rationalism from Cavaillès to Deleuze |url=https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/spinoza-contra-phenomenology-french-rationalism-from-cavaills-to-deleuze/ |access-date=2022-05-19 |website=Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews |language=en}}</ref> His philosophical accomplishments and moral character prompted [[Gilles Deleuze]] in his doctoral thesis (1968) to name him "the prince of philosophers".{{Sfn|Deleuze|1990a}}<ref>Quoted in the translator's preface of {{harvnb|Deleuze|1990a}}.</ref> Deleuze's interpretation of Spinoza's philosophy was highly influential among French philosophers, especially in restoring to prominence the political dimension of Spinoza's thought.<ref name=":1">{{Citation |last=Rocha |first=Mauricio |title=Spinozist Moments in Deleuze: Materialism as Immanence |date=2021 |url=https://press.ici-berlin.org/doi/10.37050/ci-20/rocha_spinozist-moments-in-deleuze.html |work=Materialism and Politics |pages=73–90 |place=Berlin |publisher=ICI Berlin Press |language=en-GB |doi=10.37050/ci-20_04 |access-date=2022-05-19 |s2cid=234131869|doi-access=free }}.</ref> Deleuze published two books on Spinoza and gave numerous lectures on Spinoza in his capacity as a professor at the [[University of Paris VIII]]. His own work was deeply influenced by Spinoza's philosophy, particularly the concepts of [[immanence]] and [[Univocity of being|univocity]]. [[Marilena de Souza Chaui]] described Deleuze's ''Expressionism in Philosophy'' (1968) as a "revolutionary work for its discovery of expression as a central concept in Spinoza's philosophy."<ref name=":1" />{{clarification needed|date=March 2024}}
[[File:Einstein 1921 by F Schmutzer - restoration.jpg|thumb|upright=.7|Einstein 1921]]
[[Albert Einstein]] named Spinoza as the philosopher who exerted the most influence on his [[world view]] (''Weltanschauung''). Spinoza equated God (infinite substance) with Nature, consistent with Einstein's belief in an impersonal deity. In 1929, Einstein was asked in a telegram by [[Herbert S. Goldstein|Rabbi Herbert S. Goldstein]] whether he believed in God. Einstein responded by telegram: "I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fates and actions of human beings."<ref>{{cite news | title = Einstein believes in "Spinoza's God"; Scientist Defines His Faith in Reply, to Cablegram From Rabbi Here. Sees a Divine Order But Says Its Ruler Is Not Concerned "Wit [sic] Fates and Actions of Human Beings." |work=The New York Times | date = 25 April 1929 | url = http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F10B1EFC3E54167A93C7AB178FD85F4D8285F9 | access-date =8 September 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Holton |first=Gerald |url=http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/essay-einsteins-third-paradise.htm |title=Einstein's Third Paradise |work=The Center for History of Physics |publisher=American Institute of Physics |access-date=2 May 2011| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110522061107/http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/essay-einsteins-third-paradise.htm| archive-date= 22 May 2011 |url-status = dead}}</ref> Einstein wrote the preface to a biography of Spinoza, published in 1946.<ref>{{cite book |last=Kaiser |first=Rudolf |title=Spinoza: Portrait of a Spiritual Hero |location=New York |publisher=Philosophical Library |date=1946}}</ref>

[[Leo Strauss]] dedicated his first book, ''Spinoza's Critique of Religion'', to an examination of his ideas. Strauss identified Spinoza as part of the tradition of Enlightenment rationalism that eventually produced Modernity. Moreover, he identifies Spinoza and his works as the beginning of Jewish Modernity.<ref name=tws9912/> More recently [[Jonathan Israel]] argued that, from 1650 to 1750, Spinoza was "the chief challenger of the fundamentals of revealed religion, received ideas, tradition, morality, and what was everywhere regarded, in absolutist and non-absolutist states alike, as divinely constituted political authority."{{sfn|Israel|2001|p=159}}

Spinoza is an important historical figure in the [[Netherlands]], where his portrait was featured prominently on the Dutch 1000-[[Dutch guilder|guilder]] [[banknote]], [[legal tender]] until the euro was introduced in 2002. The highest and most prestigious scientific award of the Netherlands is named the [[Spinoza Prize]] ({{lang|nl|Spinozaprijs}}). Spinoza was included in a 50 theme canon that attempts to summarise the history of the Netherlands.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.canonvannederland.nl/nl/spinoza |title=Spinosa |work=Canon van Nederland |publisher=[[Netherlands Open Air Museum]] |access-date=7 October 2025}}</ref> In 2014 a copy of Spinoza's ''Tractatus Theologico-Politicus'' was presented to the Chair of the Dutch Parliament, and shares a shelf with the [[Bible]] and the [[Quran]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.trouw.nl/tr/nl/4500/Politiek/article/detail/3282363/2012/07/05/Van-der-Ham-biedt-Verbeet-Spinoza-aan---voor-naast-Bijbel-en-Koran.dhtml |title=Van der Ham biedt Verbeet Spinoza aan—voor naast Bijbel en Koran |publisher=RTL Nieuws | date=5 July 2012 |lang=nl |access-date=30 November 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250307204842/https://www.trouw.nl/nieuws/van-der-ham-biedt-verbeet-spinoza-aan-voor-naast-bijbel-en-koran~b4678eca/ |archive-date=2025-03-07}}</ref>

==Modern era==

=== Spinoza and Zionism ===
In the [[Tractatus Theologico-Politicus|Tractatus]] Spinoza said, in passing, about the Jews that "were it not that the fundamental principles of their religion discourage manliness, I would not hesitate to believe that they will one day, given the opportunity, [...] establish once more their independent state, and that God will again choose them".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Spinoza |first=Benedictus de |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5cxCWSEx17cC&pg=PA100 |title=Tractatus Theologico-Politicus |date=1991 |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-09550-2 |pages=100 |language=en |translator-last=Shirley |translator-first=Samuel |trans-title=}}</ref> This comment, and Spinoza's general emphasis on the political-national aspects of Judaism,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Schwartz |first=Dov |date=1993 |editor-last= |editor-first= |title=Yovel, "Spinoza and Other Heretics" (Book Review) |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1455180?read-now=1&seq=2 |journal=The Jewish Quarterly Review |volume=83 |issue=3/4 |pages=452–457 |doi=10.2307/1455180 |jstor=1455180 |issn=0021-6682 |quote=a thorough evaluation of Spinoza's influence on the Zionist idea would take into account the presentation of Israel in the Tractatus as a "normal" nation|url-access=subscription }}</ref> had inspired some of the secular [[forerunners of Zionism]].{{Efn|e.g. [[Moses Hess]], [[Leon Pinsker]], [[George Eliot|George Elliot]].{{Sfn|Smith|2016|pp=90, 106}}}} Some Zionist leaders even described Spinoza as the first secular [[Proto-Zionism|proto-Zionist]].{{Efn|Most notably [[David Ben-Gurion]]. See {{harvnb|Novak|2015}}:  "For Ben-Gurion and others like him, Spinoza was the prototype of the new kind of Jew they thought themselves to be, and the new kind of Jew they wanted Israeli Jews, especially, to become. The question is whether or not Spinoza is really the kind of precedent a secular Zionist like Ben-Gurion was hopefully looking for."}} Some scholars agree (to various degrees) with the characterization of Spinoza as proto-Zionist,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Strauss |first=Leo |author-link=Leo Strauss |date=1981 |title=Progress or Return? The Contemporary Crisis in Western Civilization |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1396371 |journal=Modern Judaism |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=17–45 |doi=10.1093/mj/1.1.17 |jstor=1396371 |issn=0276-1114 |quote="It is the first inkling of unqualifiedly political Zionism."}}</ref>{{sfn|Yovel|1989a|p=190-193}}<ref>{{Harvnb|Smith|2016|pp=88–108}}: "Spinoza has entered the history of Jewish thought as the spiritual ancestor of Zionism"</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Novak|2015}}: "Spinoza not only predicted the reality of the Jewish state Jews now enjoy, but he gave Zionism as the idea of the Jewish state a cogent philosophical expression."</ref> while other scholars are critical of it.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Popkin |first=Richard H. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Qhy9DwAAQBAJ |title=Spinoza |date=2013 |publisher=Simon and Schuster |isbn=978-1-78074-469-8 |pages=62 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Levy |first=Zeev |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=40sqAAAAYAAJ |title=Baruch or Benedict : On Some Jewish Aspects of Spinoza's Philosophy |date=1989 |publisher=P. Lang |isbn=978-0-8204-0986-3 |pages=74 |language=en}}</ref>

===Reconsideration of Spinoza's expulsion===
There has been a renewed debate in modern times about Spinoza's excommunication among Israeli politicians, rabbis and Jewish press, with many calling for the ''cherem'' to be reversed.<ref name="Rutledge 2020">{{cite web | last=Rutledge | first=David | title=The Jewish philosopher Spinoza was one of the great Enlightenment thinkers. So why was he 'cancelled'?  | website=ABC News|series=[[ABC Radio National]] (The Philosopher's Zone)| publisher=[[Australian Broadcasting Corporation]] | date=3 October 2020 | url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-10-04/17th-century-jewish-philosopher-spinoza-cancel-culture-comeback/12722826 | access-date=7 October 2020}}</ref> A conference was organized at the YIVO Institute for Jewish Research in New York entitled "From Heretic to Hero: A Symposium on the Impact of Baruch Spinoza on the 350th Anniversary of His Excommunication, 1656&ndash;2006". Presenters included [[Steven Nadler]], [[Jonathan I. Israel]], Steven B. Smith, and Daniel B. Schwartz.{{Sfn|Schwartz|2012|p=xi}} There have been calls for Spinoza's ''cherem'' to be rescinded, but it can only be done by the congregation that issued it, and the chief rabbi of that community,{{efn|{{lang|nl|Portugees-Israëlietische Gemeente te Amsterdam}} (Portuguese-Israelite commune of Amsterdam)}} [[Hakham|Haham]] [[Pinchas Toledano]], declined to do so, citing Spinoza's "preposterous ideas, where he was tearing apart the very fundamentals of our religion",<ref>{{cite news | first=Simon |last=Rocker | title = Why Baruch Spinoza is still excommunicated | newspaper = The Jewish Chronicle Online | date = 28 August 2014 | url = https://www.thejc.com/judaism/all/why-baruch-spinoza-is-still-excommunicated-1.56419}}</ref> the Amsterdam Jewish community organised a symposium in December 2015 to discuss lifting the ''cherem'', inviting scholars from around the world to form an advisory committee at the meeting. However, the rabbi of the congregation ruled that it should hold, on the basis that he had no greater wisdom than his predecessors, and that Spinoza's views had not become less problematic over time.<ref name="Rutledge 2020"/>

===Memory and memorials===
[[File:Spinoza_Nicolas_Dings_Zwanenburgwal_Amsterdam.JPG|thumb|Statue of Spinoza by Nicolas Dings in [[Zwanenburgwal]], Amsterdam with the inscription "The objective of the state is freedom" (quote from ''Tractatus Theologico-Politicus'')]]
* Spinoza Lyceum, a high school in Amsterdam South was named after Spinoza. There is also a three-metre-tall marble statue of him on the grounds of the school carved by [[Hildo Krop]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Mo 50 – Standbeeld Spinoza – Amsterdam |url=https://www.timswings.nl/hildokrop/tag/spinoza/ |publisher=Hildo Krop Museum |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220122055240/https://www.timswings.nl/hildokrop/tag/spinoza/ |archive-date=Jan 22, 2022 |access-date=June 20, 2023 |language=Dutch}}</ref>
* The Spinoza Havurah (a [[Humanistic Judaism|Humanistic Jewish]] community) was named in Spinoza's honor.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://spinozahavurah.org/about/frequently-asked-questions/ |title=Frequently Asked Questions : Why are you named after Baruch Spinoza? |publisher=Spinoza Haruvah |access-date=2025-10-07}}</ref>
* The Spinoza Foundation Monument has a statue of Spinoza located in front of the Amsterdam City Hall (at Zwanenburgwal)<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.simplyamsterdam.nl/Statue_of_Spinoza_unveiled_in_Amsterdam_centre.html |title=Statue of Spinoza unveiled in Amsterdam centre |work=Simply Amsterdam |date=2008-11-25 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221121021113/http://www.simplyamsterdam.nl/Statue_of_Spinoza_unveiled_in_Amsterdam_centre.html |archive-date=2022-11-21 |access-date=2022-11-20}}</ref> It was created by Dutch sculptor Nicolas Dings and was erected in 2008.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://uncloggedblog.com/2020/08/22/who-stands-proud-on-a-pedestal-in-amsterdam/ |title=Who stands proud on a pedestal in Amsterdam |work=Unclogged in Amsterdam : An American Expat plumbs Holland |date=2020-08-22 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221121021110/https://uncloggedblog.com/2020/08/22/who-stands-proud-on-a-pedestal-in-amsterdam/ |archive-date=2022-11-21 |access-date=2022-11-20}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://cityseeker.com/amsterdam/720148-spinoza-monument |title=Spinoza Monument |work=CitySeeker |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221121021122/https://cityseeker.com/amsterdam/720148-spinoza-monument |archive-date=2022-11-21 |access-date=2022-11-20}}</ref>

==Depictions and influence in literature==
Spinoza's life and work have been the subject of interest for several writers. For example, this influence was considerably early in German literature, where [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe|Goethe]] makes a glowing mention of the philosopher in his memoirs, highlighting the positive influence of the ''Ethics'' in his personal life.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Johan W. von |last=Goethe |author-link=Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |url=https://archive.org/details/theworksofjohann02goet/page/n14/mode/1up |title=Autobiography |volume=2 |translator-first=John |translator-last=Oxenford |publisher=The Anthological Society |location=London |date=1901 |series=The works of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |pages=178-248}}</ref> The same thing happened in the case of his compatriot, the poet [[Heinrich Heine|Heine]], who is also lavish in praise for Spinoza on his ''[[Zur Geschichte der Religion und Philosophie in Deutschland|On the History of Religion and Philosophy in Germany]]'' (1834).<ref>{{Cite book |first=Heinrich |last=Heine |author-link=Heinrich Heine |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EX4PAQAAIAAJ |title=On the History of Religion and Philosophy in Germany |editor-first=Paul Lawrence |editor-last=Rose |publisher=James Cook University of North Queensland |date=1982 |pages=56-57 |isbn=978-0-86443-406-7}}</ref>

In the following century, the Argentinian [[Jorge Luis Borges]] famously wrote two sonnets in his honor ("Spinoza" in ''El otro, el mismo'', 1964; and "Baruch Spinoza" in ''La moneda de hierro'', 1976), and several direct references to Spinoza's philosophy can be found in this writer's work.<ref>{{Cite web |first=Marcelo |last=Abadi |url=https://www.borges.pitt.edu/bsol/abadi.php |date=2001-04-14 |orig-date=Originally published 1989 |title=Spinoza in Borges' looking-glass |work=Borges Center |publisher=University of Pittsburgh }}</ref> Also in Argentina and previously to Borges, the Ukrainian-born Jewish intellectual [[Alberto Gerchunoff]] wrote a novella about philosopher's early sentimental life, ''Los amores de Baruj [sic] Spinoza'' (lit. "The loves of Baruj Spinoza", 1932), recreating a supposed affair or romantic interest with Clara Maria van den Enden, daughter of his Latin teacher and philosophical preceptor, [[Franciscus van den Enden|Franciscus]].<ref>{{Cite web |first=Diego |last=Sztulwark |url=https://www.elcohetealaluna.com/spinoza-y-la-cultura-judia-argentina/ |title=Spinoza y la cultura judía argentina |lang=es |work=El Cohete a la Luna |date=2022-02-06}}</ref>

That is not the only work of fiction where the philosopher appears as the main character. In 1837 the German writer [[Berthold Auerbach]] dedicated to him the first novel in his series on Jewish history, translated into English in 1882 (''Spinoza: a Novel'').{{Efn|See [https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Spinoza:_A_novel complete text] on Wikisource.}} Some other novels of biographical nature have appeared more recently, such as ''The Spinoza Problem'' (2012; a parallel story between the philosopher's formative years, and the fascination that his work had on the Nazi leader [[Alfred Rosenberg]]) by psychiatrist [[Irvin D. Yalom]], or ''O Segredo de Espinosa'' (lit. "The Secret of Spinoza", 2023) by Portuguese journalist [[José Rodrigues dos Santos]]. Spinoza also appears in the first novel of the Argentinian activist [[Andres Spokoiny]], ''El impío'' (lit. "The Impious", 2021), about the ''[[marrano]]'' physician and philosopher [[w:es:Juan de Prado|Juan de Prado]], a key influence in Spinoza's biography.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Huitron |first=Luis |url=https://www.enlacejudio.com/2022/05/27/el-impio-de-andres-spokoiny/ |title=El Impío de Andrés Spokoiny |lang=es |work=Elance Judio |date=2022-05-27}}</ref>

Spinoza's ''[[Spinoza's Ethics|Ethics]]'' play a central role in [[Isaac Bashevis Singer]]'s short story, ''The Spinoza of Market Street''. The main character, Dr. Nahum Fischelson, studies the book religiously, and holds Spinoza in divine esteem.

==Works==
===Original Editions===
* {{circa|1660}}. ''[[s:nl:Korte Verhandeling van God, de mensch en deszelvs welstand|Korte Verhandeling van God, de mensch en deszelvs welstand]]'' (unpublished until the 19th century; ''[https://archive.org/details/spinozasshorttre00spinuoft A Short Treatise on God, Man and His Well-Being]''; translated by A. Wolf. London, Adam and Charles Black Eds., 1910).
* 1662. ''[[Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione]]'' (''On the Improvement of the Understanding'') (unfinished).
* 1663. ''[[Principia philosophiae cartesianae]]'' (''[http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k943625 The Principles of Cartesian Philosophy]'', also contains ''Metaphysical Thoughts''/''Cogitata Metaphisica''; translated by Samuel Shirley, with an Introduction and Notes by Steven Barbone and Lee Rice, Indianapolis, 1998).
* 1670. ''[[Tractatus Theologico-Politicus]]'' (''[https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Theologico-Political_Treatise_1862 A Theologico-Political Treatise]''), TTP, published anonymously in his lifetime with a false place of publication.
* 1675–76. ''[[Tractatus Politicus]]'' (''[https://web.archive.org/web/20110723220332/http://www.spinozacsack.net78.net/Political%20Treatise%2C%20Benedict%20de%20Spinoza.pdf Political Treatise]''), TP (unfinished at his death), published posthumously.
* 1677. ''[[Ethics (Spinoza book)|Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata]]'' (''The Ethics'', finished 1674, but published posthumously, title added posthumously).
* 1677. ''Compendium grammatices linguae hebraeae'' (''Hebrew Grammar'', unfinished; translated with introduction by M. J. Bloom, London, 1963).<ref>{{cite journal |first=G. |last=Licata |title=Spinoza e la cognitio universalis dell'ebraico. Demistificazione e speculazione grammaticale nel Compendio di grammatica ebraica |work=Giornale di Metafisica |lang=es |volume=3 |date=2009 |pages=625–661}}</ref>
* 1677. ''[[Epistolae (Spinoza)|Epistolae]]'' (''The Letters'', translated by Samuel Shirley, with an Introduction and Notes by S. Barbone, L. Rice and J. Adler, Indianapolis, 1995).
* Last four were originally collected and published by Spinoza's friends briefly later his death, in: ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=BoTe8vhY5dkC B. d. S. Opera Posthuma, Quorum series post Praefationem exhibetur]''. (Amsterdam: Jan Rieuwertsz, 1677; both publisher and place were purposely omitted). Simultaneously, Rieuwertsz also published a Dutch translation by [[Jan Hendriksz Glazemaker]] (who some years later translated the TTP): ''De Nagelate Schriften van B. d. S.'', without the ''Hebrew Grammar''.

===Contemporary Editions===
* Shirley, Samuel (2002). Morgan, Michael L. (ed.). Spinoza Complete Works, with the Translations by Samuel Shirley. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. ISBN 978-0-87220-620-5. OCLC 49775415.
* Edwin Curley (ed.), 1985, 2016. ''The Collected Works of Spinoza'' (two volumes), Princeton: Princeton University Press.(Excludes the ''Compendium grammatices linguae hebraeae'').
* Spruit, Leen and Pina Totaro, 2011. ''The Vatican Manuscript of Spinoza's Ethica'', Leiden: Brill. This is the only known surviving manuscript of Spinoza's ''Ethics'', discovered in the Vatican archive and published in a bilingual Latin-English edition.

==See also==
* [[History of the Jews in the Netherlands]]
* [[List of Epistolae (Letters) of Spinoza]]
* [[List of works about Baruch Spinoza]]

==References==
===Notes===
{{notelist|30em}}

===Citations===
{{reflist|30em}}

===Sources===
<!-- Some of these sources are called by harv/sfn references in the text, removing them causes reference errors -->
{{refbegin|30em|indent=yes}}
* {{cite book |last=Adler |first=Jacob |chapter=Mortality of the soul from Alexander of Aphrodisias to Spinoza |pages=13–35 |editor-last=Nadler |editor-first=Steven |editor-link=Steven Nadler |title=Spinoza and Medieval Jewish Philosophy |location=Cambridge |year=2014 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |isbn=978-1-139-79539-5 |doi=10.1017/CBO9781139795395.002| via=[[Cambridge Core]]}}
* {{cite book |last=Attar |first=Samar |author-link=Samar al-'Aṭṭār |title=The vital roots of European enlightenment: Ibn Tufayl's influence on modern Western thought |date=2007 |publisher=Lexington Books |location=Lanham |isbn=978-0-7391-1989-1 |url=https://archive.org/details/the-vital-roots-of-european-enlightenment-ibn-tufayls-influence-on-modern-western-thought-2007}}
* {{cite book |last=Bennett |first=Jonathan |author-link=Jonathan Bennett (philosopher)|title=A Study of Spinoza's ''Ethics'' |date=1984 |publisher=Hackett Publishing Company|isbn=0-915145-83-9|oclc=1036958076 |url=https://archive.org/details/studyofspinozase00benn |url-access=registration}}
* {{cite book |last=Buruma |first=Ian |author-link=Ian Buruma|title=Spinoza: Freedom's Messiah |date=2024 |publisher=Yale University Press|isbn=978-0-30-024892-0}}
* {{cite book |last=Carlisle |first=Clare |title=Spinoza's Religion |publisher=Princeton University Press |date=2021 |isbn=978-0-691-17659-8}}
* {{cite book |editor-last=Curley |editor-first=Edwin |title=The Collected Works of Spinoza, Volume 1 |date=1985 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-07222-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VRCnDwAAQBAJ}}
* {{Cite Book |last=Deleuze |first=Gilles |author-link=Gilles Deleuze |date=1990a |title=Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza |translator-first=Martin |translator-last=Joughin |location=New York |publisher=Zone Books |isbn=978-0-942299-51-9}}
* {{Cite book |last=Della Rocca |first=Michael |title=Spinoza |year=2008 |location=New York |publisher=[[Routledge]] |url=https://archive.org/details/rocca-michael-della-spinoza |isbn=978-0-41-528330-4}}
* {{cite book |last=Garber |first=Daniel |chapter=Spinoza's Cartesian Dualism in the Korte Verhandeling |pages=121–132 |title=The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making| editor-last=Melamed |editor-first=Yitzhak Y.|editor-link=Yitzhak Melamed |year=2015 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-997166-4 |oclc=900634238 |doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199971657.003.0008}}
* {{cite book |last=Goldstein |first=Rebecca |author-link=Rebecca Newberger Goldstein |title=Betraying Spinoza: The Renegade Jew who Gave Us Modernity |year=2006 |publisher=[[Schocken Books]] |location=New York |url=https://archive.org/details/betrayingspinoza00gold_0 |url-access=registration |isbn=978-0-8052-4209-6 |oclc=61859859}}
* {{Cite book |last=Gullan-Whur |first=Margaret |title=Within Reason: A Life of Spinoza |date=1998 |url=https://archive.org/details/withinreasonlife0000gull_q0h8 |url-access=registration |publisher=Jonathan Cape |isbn=978-0-224-05046-3}}
* {{cite book|last=Israel |first=Jonathan |author-link=Jonathan Israel |chapter=The Banning of Spinoza's Works in the Dutch Republic |pages=3–14 |editor-last1=van Bunge |editor-first1=Wiep |editor-last2=Klever |editor-first2=Win | editor-link1=Wiep van Bunge |editor-link2=Wim Klever |title=Disguised and Overt Spinozism Around 1700: Papers Presented at the International Colloquium held at Rotterdam, 5-8 October 1994 |location=Leiden | year=1996|publisher=[[Brill Publishers]] |isbn=9004103074}}
* {{cite book |last=Israel |first=Jonathan |author-link=Jonathan Israel |title= Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650-1750 |date=2001 |url=https://archive.org/details/radicalenlighten0000isra|url-access=registration |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-925456-9}}
* {{cite book |last=Israel |first=Jonathan |author-link=Jonathan Israel |title=Spinoza, Life and Legacy |year=2023 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-885748-8}}
* {{cite book|last=Jaspers|first=Karl|author-link=Karl Jaspers|title=Spinoza|series=Great Philosophers|publisher=Harvest Books|date=23 October 1974|isbn=978-0-15-684730-8}}
* {{cite book |last=Koistinen |first=Olli |chapter=Spinoza on Mind |pages=273–294 |editor-last=Della Rocca |editor-first=Michael |title=The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza |location=Cambridge |year=2018 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |isbn=978-0-195-33582-8 |doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195335828.013.004}}
* {{cite book |last=Kreines |first=James |title=Reason in the World: Hegel's Metaphysics and Its Philosophical Appeal |year=2015 |author-link=James Kreines |url=https://archive.org/details/james-kreines-reason-in-the-world-hegels-metaphysics-and-its-philosophical-appeal |location=Oxford |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |isbn=978-0-19-020430-3}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Lin |first=Martin |date=September 2007 |doi=10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00076.x |title=Spinoza's Arguments for the Existence of God |journal=[[Philosophy and Phenomenological Research]] |volume=75 |issue=2 |pages=269–297 |issn=0031-8205}}
* {{cite book|last=Nadler |first=Steven M. |author-link=Steven Nadler|year=1999|title=Spinoza: A Life|url=https://archive.org/details/spinozalife00nadl_0 |url-access=registration |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-55210-3 |oclc=185335604}}
* {{cite book|last=Nadler|first=Steven M.|year=2001a |title=Spinoza's Heresy: Immortality and the Jewish Mind|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bxCm-mzkW1UC|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=New York|isbn=978-0-19-926887-0}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Nadler |first=Steven |date=2001b |title=The Excommunication of Spinoza: Trouble and Toleration in the "Dutch Jerusalem" |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/42943396 |journal=Shofar |volume=19 |issue=4 |pages=40–52 |jstor=42943396 |issn=0882-8539}}
* {{cite book|last=Nadler|first=Steven|year=2011|title=A Book Forged in Hell: Spinoza's Scandalous Treatise and the Birth of the Secular Age|publisher=Princeton University Press|location=Princeton, New Jersey|isbn=978-0-691-13989-0}}
* {{cite book |last=Nadler |first=Steven M. |author-link=Steven Nadler 
|title=Spinoza: A Life |year=2018 |publisher=Cambridge University Press|location=Cambridge |isbn=978-1-108-44246-6 |edition=2nd}}
* {{cite book| last=Newlands |first=Samuel |chapter=Spinoza on Universals |pages=62–86 |editor1-last=Di Bella |editor1-first=Stefano |editor2-last=Schmaltz |editor2-first=Tad M.|title=The Problem of Universals in Early Modern Philosophy | year=2017 |location=New York |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |isbn=978-0-19-060806-4 |doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190608040.001.0001}}
* {{Citation |title=Was Spinoza the First Zionist? |date=2015 |work=Zionism and Judaism: A New Theory |pages=23–47 |editor-last=Novak |editor-first=David |editor-link=David Novak |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/zionism-and-judaism/was-spinoza-the-first-zionist/F92C368B5D38D478D495345FEC7DCBC0 |access-date=2025-01-19 |place=Cambridge |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-09995-1}}
* {{cite book |last=Popkin |first=Richard H. |chapter=Baruch de Spinoza |pages=373–382 |editor-last=Popkin |editor-first=Richard H. |editor-link=Richard Popkin |title=The Columbia History of Western Philosophy |location=New York |year=1999 |publisher=[[Columbia University Press]] |isbn=978-1-567-31347-5 |oclc=44808176}}
* {{cite book |last=Popkin |first=Richard H. |author-link=Richard Popkin |title=Spinoza |year=2004 | publisher=[[Oneworld Publications]] |isbn=978-1-85168-339-0}}
* {{Cite book |last=Schwartz |first=Daniel B. |title=The First Modern Jew: Spinoza and the History of an Image |publisher=Princeton University Press |date=2012 |isbn=978-1-4008-4226-1}}
* {{cite book |last=Scruton |first=Roger |author-link=Roger Scruton |date=2002 |title=Spinoza: A Very Short Introduction |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mRf9C8H6SPUC |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-280316-0}}
* {{cite book |last=Shirley |first=Samuel |title=Spinoza Complete Works, with the Translations by Samuel Shirley |editor-last=Morgan |editor-first=Michael L. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Xg8V-Q7Slh4C |year=2002 |location=Indianapolis |publisher=[[Hackett Publishing Company]] |isbn=978-0-87220-620-5 |oclc=49775415}}
* {{cite journal |last=Simkins |first=James |title=On the Development of Spinoza's Account of Human Religion |journal=Intermountain West Journal of Religious Studies |date=Spring 2014 |volume=5 |number=1 |pages=52–72 |issn=2155-1723 |url=https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1036&context=imwjournal}}
* {{cite book |last=Smith |first=Steven B. |author-link=Steven B. Smith (professor) |title=Spinoza, Liberalism, and the Question of Jewish Identity |year=1997 |location=New Haven |publisher=[[Yale University Press]] |isbn=978-0-300-07665-3}}
* {{cite book |last=Smith |first=Steven B. |author-link=Steven B. Smith (professor) |title=Spinoza's Book of Life: Freedom and Redemption in the ''Ethics'' |year=2003 |location=New Haven |publisher=[[Yale University Press]] |isbn=0-300-10019-1 |url=https://archive.org/details/spinozasbookofli0000smit |url-access=registration}}
* {{Cite book |last=Smith |first=Steven B. |author-link=Steven B. Smith (professor) |title=Modernity and Its Discontents: Making and Unmaking the Bourgeois from Machiavelli |date=2016 | location=New Haven, Connecticut |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-19839-3}}
* {{Cite book |last=Spinoza |first=Benedictus de |translator-last=Curley |translator-first=Edwin |url=https://archive.org/details/ethics0000spin_w3j0 |title=Ethics |date=1996 |publisher=[[Penguin Books]] |isbn=978-0-14-043571-9 |edition=1st |series=Penguin classics |location=London |ref={{harvid|Curley|1996}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Stewart |first=Matthew |author-link=Matthew Stewart (philosopher) |title=The Courtier and the Heretic: Leibniz, Spinoza, and the Fate of God in the Modern World |location=New York |publisher=[[W. W. Norton and Company]] |year=2006 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mKQ-dLe28z0C |isbn=978-0-393-32917-9 |oclc=1064514238}}
* {{cite book |last=Totaro |first=Pina |chapter=The Young Spinoza and the Vatican Manuscript of Spinoza's Ethics |pages=319–332 |title=The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making| editor-last=Melamed |editor-first=Yitzhak Y.|editor-link=Yitzhak Melamed |year=2015 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-997166-4 |oclc=900634238| doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199971657.003.0021}}
* {{cite book |last=Touber |first=Jetze |title=Spinoza and Biblical Philology in the Dutch Republic, 1660–1710 |year=2018 |location=New York |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |isbn=978-0-19-880500-7 |oclc=1042074357 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BWliDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA45}}
* {{cite journal |journal=[[The Westminster Review]] |title=The Religious Difficulties of India |url=https://archive.org/details/sim_westminster-review_1862-07-01_78_153/page/244 |volume=78 |edition=American |location=New York|publisher=Leonard Scott & Co. |year=1862 |pages=245–263 |hdl=2027/mdp.39015013165819?urlappend=%3Bseq=264 |hdl-access=free |ref={{harvid|The Westminster Review|1862}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Yovel |first=Yirmiyahu |author-link=Yirmiyahu Yovel |title=Spinoza and Other Heretics: The Marrano of Reason | publisher=Princeton University Press |year=1989a |volume=1 |location=Princeton, New Jersey |isbn=0-691-07344-9 |oclc=24378397}}
* {{cite book |last=Yovel |first=Yirmiyahu |author-link=Yirmiyahu Yovel |title=Spinoza and other heretics: The Adventures of Immanence | publisher=Princeton University Press |year=1989b |volume=2 |location=Princeton, New Jersey |isbn=0-691-02079-5 |oclc=1273001409 |url=https://archive.org/details/spinozaotherhere00yirm |url-access=registration}}
{{refend}}

==Further reading==
{{refbegin|30em|indent=yes}}
* {{Cite book |last=Damásio |first=António |author-link=António Damásio |date=2003 |title=Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain |publisher=Harvest Books |isbn=978-0-15-602871-4}}
* {{Cite book |last=Deleuze |first=Gilles |author-link=Gilles Deleuze |date=1970 |title=Spinoza: Philosophie pratique |trans-title=[[Spinoza: Practical Philosophy]] |publisher=Presses Universitaires de France}}
* {{Cite book |last=Deleuze |first=Gilles |author-link=Gilles Deleuze |date=1990b |title=Negotiations |translator-first=Martin |translator-last=Joughin |location=New York |publisher=Columbia University Press |isbn=978-0-231-07580-0}}
* {{Cite book |last=Della Rocca |first=Michael |date=1996 |title=Representation and the Mind-Body Problem in Spinoza |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-509562-3}}
* {{Cite IEP|last=Dutton|first=Blake D.|url-id=spinoza-religion|title=Spinoza's Philosophy of Religion}}
* {{cite book |editor-last=Garrett | editor-first=Don | title=The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza | publisher=Cambridge University Press | date=2021 |isbn=978-1-107-47987-6}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Gatens |first1=Moira |last2=Lloyd |first2=Genevieve |date=1999 |title=Collective imaginings: Spinoza, past and present |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-16570-9}}
* {{Cite book |last=Goode |first=Francis |date=2012 |title=Life of Spinoza |edition=Smashwords |isbn=978-1-4661-3399-0}}
* {{Cite book |last=Hampshire |first=Stuart |author-link=Stuart Hampshire |title=Spinoza and Spinozism |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=2005 |isbn=978-0-19-927954-8}}
* {{Cite book |last=Israel |first=Jonathan |author-link=Jonathan Israel |date=2002 |chapter=Philosophy, Commerce and the Synagogue: Spinoza's Expulsion from the Amsterdam Portuguese Jewish Community in 1656 |title=Dutch Jewry: Its History and Secular Culture (1500-2000) |editor1-first=Jonathan |editor1-last=Israel |editor2-first=Reinier |editor2-last=Salverda |pages=125–140 |location=Leiden |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-12436-3}}
* {{Cite book |last=Israel |first=Jonathan |author-link=Jonathan Israel |date=2006 |title=Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man 1670–1752 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-927922-7}}
* {{cite book|last=Ives|first=David|author-link=David Ives|year=2009|title=[[New Jerusalem (play)|New Jerusalem; The Interrogation of Baruch de Spinoza at Talmud Torah Congregation: Amsterdam, 27 July 1656]]|publisher=Dramatists Play Service|location=New York|isbn=978-0-8222-2385-6}}
* {{Cite book |last=Kayser |first=Rudolf |date=1946 |title=Spinoza: Portrait of a Spiritual Hero |location=New York |publisher=The Philosophical Library}}
* {{Cite book |last=Kisner |first=Matthew J. |date=2011 |title=Spinoza on human freedom: Reason, autonomy and the good life |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-19888-2}}
* {{Cite book |editor-last=Koistinen |editor-first=Olli |date=2009 |title=The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza's Ethics |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-61860-1}}
* {{Cite book |last=LeBuffe |first=Michael |date=2010 |title=From bondage to freedom : Spinoza on human excellence |publisher=Oxford University Press | isbn=978-0-19-538353-9}}
* {{Cite book |last=Lloyd |first=Genevieve |author-link=Genevieve Lloyd |date=1994 |title=Part of Nature: Self-Knowledge in Spinoza's Ethics |location=Ithaca |publisher=Cornell University Press |isbn=978-0-8014-2999-6}} 
* {{Cite book |last=Lloyd |first=Genevieve |author-link=Genevieve Lloyd |date=2018 |title=Reclaiming wonder. After the sublime |publisher=Edinburgh University Press |isbn=978-1-4744-3311-2}}
* {{Cite book |last=Lovejoy |first=Arthur O. |author-link=Arthur O. Lovejoy |date=2001 |orig-date=Originally published 1936 |chapter=Plenitude and Sufficient Reason in Leibniz and Spinoza |title=The Great Chain of Being |publisher=Harvard University Press |pages=144–182 |isbn=978-0-674-36153-9}} Reprinted in {{Cite book |editor-last=Frankfurt |editor-first=H. G. |date=1972 |title=Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays |publisher=Anchor Books |isbn=978-0-268-01258-8}}
* {{Cite book |last=Macherey |first=Pierre |author-link=Pierre Macherey |date=1990 |title=Hegel ou Spinoza |lang=fr |edition=2nd |publisher=La Découverte |isbn=978-2-7071-1961-2}}
* {{Cite book |last=Macherey |first=Pierre |author-link=Pierre Macherey |date=1994–1998 |title=Introduction à l'Ethique de Spinoza |lang=fr |publisher=Presses universitaires de France}}
* {{Cite book |editor-last=Magnusson |editor-first=Magnus |date=1990 |chapter=Spinoza, Baruch |title=Chambers Biographical Dictionary |publisher=Chambers |isbn=978-0-550-16041-6}}
* {{Cite book |last=Matheron |first=Alexandre |date=1969 |title=Individu et communauté chez Spinoza |lang=fr |location=Paris |publisher=[[Les Éditions de Minuit]]}}
* {{cite book |last=Millner |first=Simon L. |title=The Face of Benedictus Spinoza |location=New York |publisher=Machmadim Art Editions |date=1946}}
* {{Cite book |last=Montag |first=Warren |title=Bodies, Masses, Power: Spinoza and his Contemporaries |location=London |publisher=Verso |date=1999 |isbn=978-1-85984-701-5}}
* {{Cite book |editor1-last=Montag |editor1-first=Warren |editor1-link=Warren Montag |editor2-last=Stolze |editor2-first=Ted |title=The New Spinoza |location=Minneapolis |publisher=University of Minnesota Press |date=1997 |isbn=978-0-8166-2540-6}}
* {{Cite book |last=Moreau |first=Pierre-François |date=2003 |title=Spinoza et le spinozisme |lang=fr |publisher=Presses universitaires de France}}
* {{Cite book |last=Nadler |first=Steven |author-link=Steven Nadler |title=Think Least of Death: Spinoza on How to Live and How to Die |date=2020 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-18384-8}}
* {{Cite book |last=Negri |first=Antonio |author-link=Antonio Negri |date=1991 |title=The Savage Anomaly : The Power of Spinoza's Metaphysics and Politics |publisher=University of Minnesota Press |isbn=978-0-8166-1876-7}}
* {{Cite book |last=Negri |first=Antonio |author-link=Antonio Negri |date=2004 |title=Subversive Spinoza : (Un)Contemporary Variations |publisher=Manchester University Press |isbn=978-0-7190-6646-7}}
* {{cite book | last = Prokhovnik | first = Raia | author-link = Raia Prokhovnik | title = Spinoza and republicanism | publisher = Palgrave Macmillan | location = Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire New York | year = 2004 |isbn=978-0-333-73390-5}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ratner |first=Joseph |date=1927 |title=The Philosophy of Spinoza |series=The Modern Library |publisher=Random House}}
* {{Cite book |last=Strauss |first=Leo |chapter=Preface to Spinoza's Critique of Religion |title=Liberalism Ancient and Modern |location=New York |publisher=Basic Books |date=1968 |pages=224–259}}; also in {{Harvnb|Strauss|1997|pages=137–177}}
* {{Cite book |last=Strauss |first=Leo |date=1988 |title=Persecution and the Art of Writing |orig-date=Originally published 1952 |location=Chicago |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=978-0-226-77711-5}}
* {{Cite book |last=Strauss |first=Leo |date=1996 |title=Spinoza's Critique of Religion |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=978-0-226-22550-0}}
* {{Cite book |contributor-last=Strauss |contributor-first=Leo |date=1997 |contribution=How to Study Spinoza's ''Tractus Theologico-Politicus'' |last=Strauss |first=Leo |title=Jewish Philosophy and the Crisis of Modernity |editor-first=Kenneth Hart |editor-last=Green |location=Albany, New York |publisher=SUNY Press |pages=181–233 |isbn=978-0-585-07664-5}}
* {{Cite book |last=Valentiner |first=Wilhelm R. |author-link=Wilhelm Valentiner |date=1957 |title=Rembrandt and Spinoza : A Study of the Spiritual Conflicts in Seventeenth-Century Holland |location=London |publisher=Phaidon Press}}
* {{Cite book |last=Van den Ven |first=Jeroen |date=2022 |title=Printing Spinoza: A Descriptive Bibliography of the Works Published in the Seventeenth Century |location=Leiden |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-46799-6}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Vinciguerra |first=Lorenzo |url=https://www.scribd.com/doc/78866030/Lorenzo-Vinciguerra-Spinoza-in-French-Philosophy-Today |title=Spinoza in French Philosophy Today |work=Philosophy Today |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200807215145/https://www.questia.com/library/p62075/philosophy-today |archive-date=7 August 2020 |volume=53 |issue=4 |date=Winter 2009}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Williams |first=David Lay |date=April 2010 |title=Spinoza and the General Will |work=[[The Journal of Politics]] |volume=72 |pages=341–356}}
* {{Cite book |last=Wolfson |first=Henry Austryn |date=1934 |title=The Philosophy of Spinoza |publisher=Harvard University Press}}
{{refend}}

==External links==
{{Commons category|Benedictus de Spinoza|Baruch de Spinoza}}
{{Wikiquote}}
{{wikisource|works=or}}

* {{Gutenberg author |id=473| name=Benedictus de Spinoza}}
* {{Librivox author |id=1355}}
* {{OL author|2946327A}}
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20070503180326/http://www.philosophyarchive.com/text.php?era=1600-1699&author=Spinoza&text=A%20Theologico-Political%20Treatise A Theologico-Political Treatise]– English Translation
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20080218203218/http://www.hs-augsburg.de/~harsch/Chronologia/Lspost17/Spinoza/spi_eth0.html Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata et in quinque partes distincta, in quibus agetur]
* [http://www.quodlibet.it/schedap.php?id=1790 ''Opera posthuma''] – Amsterdam 1677. Complete photographic reproduction, ed. by F. Mignini (Quodlibet publishing house website)
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20200130001741/https://www.georgeeliotarchive.org/items/show/321 The Ethics of Benedict de Spinoza, translated by George Eliot, transcribed by Thomas Deegan]
* "[https://ethica.bc.edu/#/ Mapping Spinoza's ''Ethics'']": visual representations of the connections between propositions in the ''Ethics''.
*[https://haifa-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/collectionDiscovery?vid=HAU&inst=972HAI_MAIN&collectionId=81168904190002791&lang=en_US Spinoza Archive] on the Digital collections of [[Younes and Soraya Nazarian Library]], University of Haifa
* [https://allenartcollection.oberlin.edu/objects/3443/het-naerder-veer-the-ferry-to-naarden-from-the-series-vie# Leprozengracht with a view on the houses at Houtgracht by Reinier Nooms, 1657 - 1662]
* {{cite web |last=Macherey |first=Pierre |url=http://multitudes.samizdat.net/article.php3?id_article=1355 |title=Préface à L'Anomalie sauvage de Negri |work=Multitudes |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110611234714/http://multitudes.samizdat.net/article.php3?id_article=1355 |archive-date=11 June 2011 |url-status=dead }}

{{Baruch Spinoza}}
{{Navboxes
|list=
{{Age of Enlightenment}}
{{metaphysics}}
{{philosophy of mind}}
{{Political philosophy}}
}}
{{Portal bar|Biography|Philosophy}}
{{Authority control}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Spinoza, Baruch}}
[[Category:1632 births]]
[[Category:1677 deaths]]
[[Category:Baruch Spinoza| ]]
[[Category:17th-century Jewish biblical scholars]]
[[Category:17th-century Jewish theologians]]
[[Category:17th-century writers in Latin]]
[[Category:17th-century Sephardi Jews]]
[[Category:17th-century Dutch philosophers]]
[[Category:Censorship in Judaism]]
[[Category:Censorship in the Netherlands]]
[[Category:Critics of Judaism]]
[[Category:Dutch critics of religions]]
[[Category:Dutch Enlightenment]]
[[Category:Critics of the Catholic Church]]
[[Category:Descartes scholars]]
[[Category:Determinists]]
[[Category:Dutch ethicists]]
[[Category:Dutch logicians]]
[[Category:Dutch people of Portuguese descent]]
[[Category:Dutch people of Portuguese-Jewish descent]]
[[Category:Dutch Sephardi Jews]]
[[Category:Enlightenment philosophers]]
[[Category:Epistemologists]]
[[Category:Freethought]]
[[Category:Heresy in Judaism]]
[[Category:Jewish philosophers]]
[[Category:Jewish skeptics]]
[[Category:Jewish translators of the Bible]]
[[Category:Metaphilosophers]]
[[Category:Metaphysicians]]
[[Category:Ontologists]]
[[Category:Pantheists]]
[[Category:People excommunicated by synagogues]]
[[Category:People of the Age of Enlightenment]]
[[Category:Philosophers of culture]]
[[Category:Philosophers of education]]
[[Category:Philosophers of history]]
[[Category:Philosophers of mind]]
[[Category:Philosophers of religion]]
[[Category:Philosophers of science]]
[[Category:Philosophy and thought in the Dutch Republic]]
[[Category:Philosophy writers]]
[[Category:Political theologians]]
[[Category:Rationalists]]
[[Category:History of secularism]]
[[Category:Social philosophers]]
[[Category:Spinoza studies]]
[[Category:Spinozism]]
[[Category:Writers from Amsterdam]]
[[Category:People of the First Anglo-Dutch War]]
[[Category:Forerunners of Zionism]]