View source for Battle of Naissus

{{Short description|Battle between the Goths and the Romans under Emperor Gallienus (268/269)}}
{{Other uses|Battle of Niš (disambiguation){{!}}Battle of Niš}}
{{Infobox military conflict
| conflict          = Battle of Naissus
| partof            = the [[Crisis of the Third Century]]<br>[[Gothic Wars]]<br>and [[Germanic Wars|Roman–Germanic Wars]]
| image             = 
| date              = 268 or 269
| place             = Naissus, [[Roman Empire]] (modern-day [[Niš]], [[Serbia]])
| casus             = 
| territory         = 
| result            = Decisive Roman victory
| combatant1        = [[Roman Empire]]
| combatant2        = [[Goths]]
| commander1        = [[Gallienus]] or [[Claudius II Gothicus|Claudius II]]<br>[[Aurelian]] (cavalry commander)
| commander2        = [[Cniva]] and/or [[Cannabaudes]]
| strength1         = Unknown
| strength2         = Unknown
| casualties1       = Light
| casualties2       = Catastrophic
}}
{{Campaignbox Crisis of the Third Century}}
The '''Battle of Naissus''' in 268 or 269 was the defeat of a [[Goths|Gothic]] coalition by the [[Roman Empire]] under [[Roman Emperor|Emperor]] [[Gallienus]] (or [[Roman Emperor|Emperor]] [[Claudius II Gothicus]]) and the future [[Roman Emperor|Emperor]] [[Aurelian]] near Naissus ([[Niš]]). The events around the invasion and the battle are an important part of the history of the [[Crisis of the Third Century]].

The result was a great Roman victory which, combined with the effective pursuit of the invaders in the aftermath of the battle and the energetic efforts of the future Emperor Aurelian, largely removed the threat from Germanic tribes in the Balkan frontier for the following decades.

==Sources==
As is often the case in the history of the Roman Empire in the troubled third century, it is very difficult to reconstruct the course of events around the battle of Naissus. Surviving accounts of the period, including [[Zosimus (historian)|Zosimus]]' ''New History'', [[Joannes Zonaras|Zonaras]]' ''Epitome of the Histories'', [[George Syncellus]]' ''Selection of Chronography'', and the ''[[Augustan History]]'', rely principally on the lost history of the Athenian [[Dexippus]]. The text of Dexippus has survived only indirectly, through quotations in the fourth-century ''Augustan History'' and extracts in ninth-century Byzantine compilations.<ref>David S. Potter, p.232&ndash;233</ref> Despite his importance for the period, Dexippus has been declared a "poor" source by the modern historian David S. Potter.<ref>David S. Potter, p.232&ndash;234</ref> To make matters worse, the works making use of Dexippus (and likely another unknown contemporary source) provide an almost radically different interpretation of events.<ref>John Bray, p.283, David S. Potter, p.641&ndash;642, n.4.</ref> The imperial propaganda in the age of [[Constantine the Great|Constantine]]'s dynasty added more confusion by attributing all the calamities to the reign of Gallienus to avoid blemishing the memory of Claudius (supposed ancestor of the dynasty).<ref>David S. Potter, p.266</ref>

As a consequence, controversy still exists on the number of invasions and the order of events and to which reign those events must be attributed.<ref>John Bray, p.279. Also David S. Potter, p.263</ref> Therefore, there is a dispute over who was the Emperor and head of the army at the time of the battle. In 1939, Andreas Alföldi, preferring the single invasion theory, suggested that Gallienus was the only one responsible for defeating the barbarian invasions, including the victory at Naissus.<ref>''The Cambridge Ancient History'', vol 12, chapter 6, p.165&ndash;231, Cambridge University Press, 1939</ref> His view had been broadly accepted since then, but modern scholarship usually attributes the final victory to Claudius II.<ref>John Bray, p.284&ndash;285, Pat Southern, p.109. Also see Alaric Watson, p.215, David S. Potter, p.266, H. Wolfram, p.54</ref> The single invasion theory has been also rejected in favour of the two separate invasions. The narrative below follows the latter view but the reader must be warned that the evidence is too confused for an entirely safe reconstruction.<ref>John Bray, p.286&ndash;288, Alaric Watson, p.216</ref>

==Background==
[[Image:GothicInvasions 267-269-en.svg|thumb|right|300px|Map of the Gothic invasions of 267&ndash;269 AD (according to the two invasions theory)]]The battle of Naissus came about as a result of two massive invasions of "[[Scythians|Scythian]]" tribes (as our sources<ref>Zosimus, see also George Syncellus, p.716</ref> anachronistically call them) into Roman territory between 267 and 269. The first wave came during the reign of Gallienus in 267 and started when the [[Heruli]], raiding on 500 ships,<ref name = Syncellus/> ravaged the southern Black Sea coast and unsuccessfully attacked [[Byzantium]] and [[Cyzicus]]. They were defeated by the [[Roman navy]] but managed to escape into the [[Aegean Sea]], where they ravaged the islands of [[Lemnos]] and [[Skyros]] and sacked several cities of the southern Greek [[Achaea (Roman province)|province of Achaea]], including [[Athens]], [[Ancient Corinth|Corinth]], [[Argos, Peloponnese|Argos]], and [[Sparta]]. Then an Athenian militia, led by the historian [[Dexippus]], pushed the invaders to the north where they were intercepted by the Roman army under Gallienus.<ref>''Scriptores Historiae Augustae'', ''Vita Gallienii'', 13.8</ref> He won an important victory near the [[Nestos River]], on the boundary between [[Macedonia (Roman province)|Macedonia]] and [[Thrace]], with the aid of the Dalmatian cavalry. Reported barbarian casualties were 3,000 men.<ref name = Zosimus/> Subsequently, the Heruli leader [[Naulobatus]] came to terms with the Romans.<ref name=Syncellus>G. Syncellus, p.717</ref>

In the past, the battle on the Nessos was identified as the Battle of Naissus, but modern scholarship has rejected this view. On the contrary, there is a theory that the victory at Nessos was so decisive that Claudius' efforts against the Goths (including the battle of Naissus) were no more than a mopping-up operation.<ref>T. Forgiarini, ''A propos de Claude II: Les invasion gothiques de 269&ndash;270 et le role de l' empereur'', in ''Les empereurs illyriens'', Frezouls et Jouffroy, p.81&ndash;86. (as cited in D. Potter, p.642). This view is in agreement with A. Alfoldi</ref> After his victory, Gallienus left [[Lucius Aurelius Marcianus]] in place and hastily left for Italy, intending to suppress the revolt of his cavalry officer [[Aureolus]].<ref>Zosimus, 1.40</ref> After Gallienus was assassinated outside [[Milan]] in the summer of 268 in a plot led by high officers in his army, Claudius was proclaimed emperor and headed to Rome to establish his rule. Claudius' immediate concerns were with the [[Alemanni]], who had invaded [[Raetia]] and Italy. After he defeated them in the [[Battle of Lake Benacus]], he was finally able to take care of the invasions in the Balkan provinces.<ref>John Bray, p.290</ref>

In the meantime, the second and larger sea-borne invasion had started. An enormous coalition of "Scythians"—actually consisting of Goths ([[Greuthungi]] and [[Thervingi]]), [[Gepids]], and [[Peuce Island|Peucini]], led again by the [[Heruli]]—assembled at the mouth of river Tyras ([[Dniester]]).<ref>The ''Historia Augusta'' mentions Scythians, Greuthungi, Tervingi, Gepids, Peucini, Celts and Heruli. Zosimus names Scythians, Heruli, Peucini and Goths.</ref> The ''Augustan History'' and [[Zosimus (historian)|Zosimus]] claim a total number of 2,000&ndash;6,000 ships and 325,000 men.<ref>''Scriptores Historiae Augustae'', ''Vita Divi Claudii'', 6.4</ref> This is probably a gross exaggeration but remains indicative of the scale of the invasion. After failing to storm some towns on the coasts of the western [[Black Sea]] and the [[Danube]] ([[Constanța|Tomis]], [[Marcianopolis]]), the invaders attacked [[Byzantium]] and [[Üsküdar#Chrysopolis|Chrysopolis]]. Part of their fleet was wrecked, either because of Gothic inexperience in sailing through the violent currents of the [[Propontis]]<ref>Zosimus, 1.42</ref> or because it was defeated by the Roman navy. They then entered the [[Aegean Sea]] and a detachment ravaged the Aegean islands as far as [[Crete]] and [[Rhodes]]. While their main force had constructed siege works and was close to taking the cities of [[Thessalonica]] and [[Cassandreia]], it retreated to the Balkan interior at the news that the emperor was advancing. On their way, they plundered Doberus ([[Paeonia (kingdom)|Paionia]]?) and [[Pelagonia]].

==Battle==
The Goths were engaged near Naissus by a Roman army advancing from the north. The battle most likely took place in 268, and was fiercely contested. Large numbers on both sides were killed but, at the critical point, the Romans tricked the Goths into an ambush by pretended flight. Some 50,000 Goths were allegedly killed or taken captive.<ref name=Zosimus>Zosimus, 1.43</ref> It seems that Aurelian, who was in charge of all Roman cavalry during reign of Claudius, led the decisive attack in the battle.

==Aftermath==
A large number of Goths managed to escape towards Macedonia, initially defending themselves behind their [[laager]]. Soon, many of them and their pack animals, distressed as they were by the harassment of the Roman cavalry and the lack of provisions, died of hunger. The Roman army methodically pursued and surrounded the survivors at [[Balkan Mountains|Mount Haemus]] where an epidemic affected the entrapped Goths.<ref>Zosimus, 1.45</ref> After a bloody but inconclusive battle, they escaped but were pursued again until they surrendered. Prisoners were admitted to the army or given land to cultivate and become [[Colonus (person)|coloni]]. The members of the pirate fleet, after the failed attacks on Crete and Rhodes, retreated and many of them suffered a similar end.<ref>John Bray, p.282. See Zosimus, 1.46</ref> However the plague also affected the pursuing Romans and Emperor Claudius, who died from it in 270.<ref>G. Syncellus, p.720</ref>

The psychological impact of this victory was so strong that Claudius became known to posterity as Claudius II ''Gothicus Maximus'' ("conqueror of the Goths"). However devastating the defeat, the battle did not entirely break the military strength of the Gothic tribes.<ref>Alaric Watson, p.216</ref> Besides, the troubles with [[Zenobia]] in the east and the breakaway [[Gallic Empire]] in the West were so urgent that the victory at Naissus could only serve as a temporary relief for the troubled Empire. In 271, after Aurelian repelled another Gothic invasion, he abandoned the province of [[Dacia]] north of the Danube in order to rationalize the defense of the Empire.<ref>David S. Potter, p.270</ref>

==Citations==
{{Reflist}}

==References==

===Primary sources===
{{refbegin}}
* [[Zosimus (historian)|Zosimus]], ''Historia Nova'' ({{langx|grc|Νέα Ἱστορία}}), book 1, in ''Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae'', ed. Bekker, Weber, Bonn, 1837
* [[George Syncellus]], ''Chronographia'' ({{langx|grc|Ἐκλογὴ χρονογραφίας}}), in ''Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae'', ed. Dindorf, Bonn, 1829
* ''[[Augustan History|Scriptores Historiae Augustae]]'', ''Vita Gallieni Duo'' & ''Vita Divi Claudii'', Loeb Classical Library, 1921&ndash;1932 (English translation), on-line at [https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Historia_Augusta/home.html Lacus Curtius]
* [[Joannes Zonaras|Zonaras]], ''Epitome historiarum'' ({{langx|grc|Ἐπιτομὴ ἱστοριῶν}}), book 12, in ''Patrologia Graeca'', ed. J.P.Migne, Paris, 1864, vol 134
{{refend}}

===Secondary sources===
{{refbegin}}
* Bray, John. ''Gallienus: A Study in Reformist and Sexual Politics'', Wakefield Press, 1997. {{ISBN|1-86254-337-2}}
* Potter, David S. ''The Roman Empire at Bay AD 180&ndash;395'', Routledge, 2004. {{ISBN|0-415-10058-5}}
* Southern, Pat. ''The Roman Empire from Severus to Constantine'', Routledge, 2001. {{ISBN|0-415-23943-5}}
* Watson, Alaric. ''Aurelian and the Third Century'', Routledge, 2003. {{ISBN|0-415-30187-4}}
* [[Herwig Wolfram|Wolfram, Herwig]]. ''History of the Goths'' (transl. by Thomas J. Dunlap), University of California Press, 1988. {{ISBN|0-520-06983-8}}
{{refend}}

{{coord|43.3|N|21.9|E|type:event_region:RS_scale:3000000|display=title}}

[[Category:268]]
[[Category:260s conflicts|Naissus]]
[[Category:Crisis of the Third Century]]
[[Category:Battles involving the Roman Empire|Naissus]]
[[Category:Battles involving the Goths|Naissus]]
[[Category:Military history of Serbia]]
[[Category:Serbia in the Roman era]]
[[Category:History of Niš]]
[[Category:Aurelian]]
[[Category:Gallienus]]