View source for Gold Runner

{{Italic title}}
{{Short description|Amtrak service in San Joaquin Valley, California}}
{{Use American English|date=April 2024}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2024}}
{{Infobox rail service
| box_width          = 300px<!-- Set to limit text wrapping -->
| name               = ''Gold Runner''
| color              = {{rcr|Amtrak|Gold Runner}}
| logo               = Logo Gold Runner.svg
| logo_width         = 200px
| image              = San Joaquins nearing Jack London Square station, March 2024.JPG
| caption            = Then- ''San Joaquins'' train approaches the [[Oakland–Jack London Square station]], 2024
| type               = [[Inter-city rail]]
| status             = 
| locale             = [[San Joaquin Valley]]
| predecessor        = ''[[Golden Gate (train)|Golden Gate]]'', ''[[San Joaquin Daylight]]''
| first              = {{Start date and age|1974|03|05}}
| last               = 
| successor          = 
| operator           = San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority, in partnership with [[Amtrak]], [[Caltrans]], [[San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission|SJRRC]] and Transit Services America
| ridership2         = {{Amtrak route ridership|Gold Runner}}
| website            = {{url|goldrunner.com}}
| start              = {{amtk|Oakland}} or {{amtk|Sacramento}}
| stops              = 16 {{nowrap|(Oakland–Bakersfield)}}<br />13 {{nowrap|(Sacramento–Bakersfield)}}
| end                = {{amtk|Bakersfield}}
| distance           = {{cvt|315|mi}} {{nowrap|(Oakland–Bakersfield)}}<br />{{cvt|282|mi}} {{nowrap|(Sacramento–Bakersfield)}}
| journeytime        = 6 hours {{nowrap|(Oakland–Bakersfield)}}<br />5 hours {{nowrap|(Sacramento–Bakersfield)}}
| frequency          = 
| trainnumber        = 701–704, 710–719
| class              = Coach Class
| access             = All cars (lower level), all stations
| catering           = [[California Car (railcar)#Café cars|Café]]
| baggage            = Overhead bins, luggage racks, checked baggage available at selected stations
| stock              = {{hlist
   | [[California Car (railcar)|California Car]]
   | [[#Comet Cars|Comet Car]]
   | [[EMD F59PHI]]
   | [[Siemens Charger]]
   | [[Siemens Venture]]
   }}
| gauge              = {{Track gauge|ussg|allk=on}}
| speed              = {{cvt|52|mph}} ({{Abbr|avg.|average, including stops}})<br />{{cvt|79|mph}} (top)
| owners             = [[BNSF Railway|BNSF]], [[Union Pacific Railroad|UP]]
| map                = {{switcher
  | {{maplink-road|from=Gold Runner.map}} Gold Runner highlighted in blue <hr />
  | Show interactive map
  | {{Amtrak Gold Runner|inline=yes}}
  | Show route diagram
  }}
}}
The '''''Gold Runner'''''<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |last=Irvin |first=Olivia |date=2025-11-03 |title=Amtrak San Joaquins Becomes Gold Runner, Marking a New Era for California Passenger Rail |url=https://media.amtrak.com/2025/11/amtrak-san-joaquins-becomes-gold-runner-marking-a-new-era-for-california-passenger-rail/ |access-date=2025-11-04 |website=Amtrak Media |language=en-US}}</ref> (formerly '''''San Joaquins''''') is a state-supported [[passenger train]] service operated by [[Amtrak]] in California's [[San Joaquin Valley]]. As of 2025, the service operates seven daily round trips between its southern terminus at [[Bakersfield, California|Bakersfield]] and [[Stockton, California|Stockton]]. Of these, five continue to [[Oakland, California|Oakland]] and two to [[Sacramento, California|Sacramento]]. Two additional Sacramento-bound round trips are scheduled to begin in [[fiscal year]] 2025.<ref name="SJJPA 2024 Business Plan">{{cite web |title=San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority 2024 Business Plan Update |url=https://cdn.sjjpa.com/wp-content/uploads/20240610084720/2024-SJJPA-Business-Plan-Update.pdf |publisher=San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority |access-date=2025-04-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250310012343/https://cdn.sjjpa.com/wp-content/uploads/20240610084720/2024-SJJPA-Business-Plan-Update.pdf |archive-date=2025-03-10 |format=pdf |date=2024-06-10}}</ref>

The service is notable for its extensive network of dedicated [[Amtrak Thruway]] bus routes, which are integral to its overall performance. More than 55% of riders use a Thruway bus for at least one segment of their journey.<ref name="buses">{{Cite web |title=Draft 2017 Business Plan Update |url=https://www.sjjpa.com/getattachment/Home/Draft-2017-SJJPA-Bus-Plan-Update-Final.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180511150121/https://www.sjjpa.com/getattachment/Home/Draft-2017-SJJPA-Bus-Plan-Update-Final.pdf |archive-date=2018-05-11 |publisher=San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority |page=3}}</ref> These routes are timed to connect with train arrivals and departures, and offer service to destinations across the state, including [[Southern California]] (notably [[Union Station (Los Angeles)|Los Angeles Union Station]], where passengers can transfer to the ''[[Pacific Surfliner]]'' or Amtrak's long-distance services), [[San Francisco, California|San Francisco]], the [[Central Coast (California)|Central Coast]], the [[North Coast (California)|North Coast]], the [[High Desert (California)|High Desert]] (including [[Las Vegas]]), [[Redding, California|Redding]], [[Reno, Nevada|Reno]], and the [[Yosemite Valley]].

With {{Amtrak route ridership|Gold Runner|ridership}} passengers in fiscal year 20{{Amtrak route ridership|Gold Runner|FY}}—a {{Amtrak route ridership|Gold Runner|percent}} change from the previous year—the ''Gold Runner'' ranked as Amtrak's seventh-busiest route nationwide and third-busiest in California.

Like other intercity rail services in California, the ''Gold Runner'' is managed by a [[joint powers authority]]: the [[San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority]] (SJJPA). Its board includes two elected representatives from each of the eight counties served by the route. The SJJPA contracts the [[Altamont Corridor Express|San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission]] to oversee daily operations, Amtrak to operate the trains, and Transit Services America for maintenance of locomotives and passenger cars. [[Caltrans]] funds the service and owns the rolling stock.

In 2025, the service was renamed from "San Joaquins" to Gold Runner to better represent the route.

==History==

===''Golden Gate/San Joaquin Daylight''===
{{see also|San Joaquin Daylight|Golden Gate (train)}}
[[File:San Joaquin at 16th Street station, March 1975.jpg|thumb|left|Ex-[[Southern Pacific Transportation Company|Southern Pacific]] [[EMD FP7]] on the ''San Joaquin'' at [[16th Street station (Oakland)|Oakland]] in 1975]]
The ''Gold Runner'' service uses several routes which once hosted a variety of daily passenger trains. Chiefly, those trains were the [[Golden Gate (train)|''Golden Gate'']] of the [[Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway]] (today BNSF), and the ''[[San Joaquin Daylight]]'' of the [[Southern Pacific Railroad]] (today Union Pacific). Other named passenger trains which served the Central Valley corridor included Southern Pacific's ''[[Owl Limited]]'', and Santa Fe's ''[[San Francisco Chief]]'' and ''[[Valley Flyer (ATSF train)|Valley Flyer]]''.

Like the modern ''Gold Runner'', the Santa Fe's ''Golden Gate'' service ran from Oakland to Bakersfield, with motor coach connections to Los Angeles.<ref>{{cite book| title=Operations Santa Fé| first=Merle| last=Armitage| page=124| year=1984| edition=reprint| orig-year=1948| editor-first=Edwin| editor-last=Corle| publisher=Omni Publications| location=Hawthorne, CA}}</ref> However, the Southern Pacific's ''San Joaquin Daylight'' continued beyond Bakersfield, directly to Los Angeles via the [[Tehachapi Pass|Tehachapi]] and [[Newhall Pass|Newhall]] mountain passes; in 1958, the complete journey took just over twelve hours — six hours, fifty-four minutes between the railroad’s [[16th Street station (Oakland)|Oakland 16th Street]] and [[Bakersfield station (Southern Pacific Railroad)|Bakersfield]] depots, and a further five hours, eight minutes to Los Angeles.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Percy |first1=Richard |title=1958 SP Passenger Timetable |url=http://espee.railfan.net/1958_pass_tt.html |website=my ESPEE MODELERS ARCHIVE |access-date=2025-04-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241130161211/http://espee.railfan.net/1958_pass_tt.html |archive-date=2024-11-30 |date=2000-12-09}}</ref>

In April 1965, as ridership on passenger trains continued to drop, Santa Fe received permission from the [[Interstate Commerce Commission]] to severely curtail ''Golden Gate'' operations,<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/57894276/the-los-angeles-times/| title=San Joaquin Valley Rail Service Cuts Approved| newspaper=The Los Angeles Times| date=March 4, 1965| page=3| via=Newspapers.com}} {{open access}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/57895629/the-hanford-sentinel/| title=Santa Fe Train Cut Permitted| agency=UPI| newspaper=The Hanford Sentinel| location=Hanford, CA| date=March 3, 1965| page=1| via=Newspapers.com}} {{open access}}</ref> and the service was entirely discontinued in 1968. The Southern Pacific's ''San Joaquin Daylight'' was discontinued with the start-up of Amtrak in May 1971.

{{Clear left}}

===Amtrak era===
Amtrak routed all Los Angeles-San Francisco service over the Southern Pacific's [[Coast Line (Union Pacific Railroad)|Coast Line]] in its initial 1971 route structure, leaving the [[San Joaquin Valley]] without service.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=Vy5LAAAAIBAJ&pg=6846,899992 |title=Vital need for passenger train |date=May 5, 1971 |work=[[Oxnard Press-Courier]] |access-date=December 31, 2012}}</ref> In 1972, Amtrak began to revisit the decision at the urging of area congressmen, notably [[Bernice F. Sisk]], who favored service from [[Barstow, California|Barstow]] to either Oakland or Sacramento.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=rTFcAAAAIBAJ&pg=5370,2315038 |title=Amtrak to take another look at area rail route |date=March 22, 1972 |work=[[Merced Sun-Star]] |access-date=December 31, 2012}}{{dead link|date=June 2016}}</ref> The inaugural run occurred on March 5, 1974, and revenue service began the following day — with one daily round-trip between Bakersfield and Oakland, and bus connections from Bakersfield to Los Angeles, and Oakland to San Francisco.<ref>{{cite press release |url=https://history.amtrak.com/archives/press-release-announcing-launch-of-the-i-san-joaquin-i-1974/@@download/item/Press%20Release_%20March%205%201974_San%20Joaquin%20Service_VonNordeck%20Collection%20WM.pdf |title=ATK-74-10 202--484-7220 |publisher=Amtrak |date=March 5, 1974 |quote=Regular revenue service begins in both directions between Oakland and Bakersfield on Thursday, March 6. |access-date=April 19, 2021 |archive-date=February 17, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220217010602/https://history.amtrak.com/archives/press-release-announcing-launch-of-the-i-san-joaquin-i-1974/@@download/item/Press%20Release_%20March%205%201974_San%20Joaquin%20Service_VonNordeck%20Collection%20WM.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> The ''San Joaquin'' could not continue south of Bakersfield due to capacity limits over the [[Tehachapi Loop]], the only line between Bakersfield and points south and one of the world's busiest single-track freight rail lines.<ref>{{harvnb|Solomon|1999|p=20}}</ref> Amtrak chose the [[Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Valley Division|Santa Fe route]] over the Southern Pacific, citing the higher speed of the Santa Fe&nbsp;– {{convert|79|mph|kph|0}} versus {{convert|70|mph|kph|0}}&nbsp;– and freight congestion on the Southern Pacific. The decision was not without controversy, with Sisk alleging that the Southern Pacific lobbied the [[Nixon administration]] to influence the decision.<ref name="tart comments">{{Cite news |url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-modesto-bee/131654975/ |title=San Joaquin Valley Amtrak route draws some tart comments |last=Cook |first=Gale |date=March 10, 1974 |work=[[Modesto Bee]] |via=Newspapers.com}} {{free access}}</ref>

[[Storey station|Madera station]] and [[Richmond station (California)|Richmond station]] were added on October 30, 1977, along with a Stockton–Sacramento connecting bus.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/64440675/the-sacramento-bee/ |title=Amtrak-Bart Station Opens |first=Richard |last=Rodda |date=October 28, 1977 |newspaper=Sacramento Bee |page=3 |via=Newspapers.com}} {{free access}}</ref> The schedule was changed on July 19, 1979, with an earlier northbound and later southbound departure, allowing single-day round trips to the Bay Area.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/64440567/the-sacramento-bee/ |title=Amtrak Run... |first=James |last=Dufur |date=July 14, 1979 |newspaper=Sacramento Bee |page=4 |via=Newspapers.com}} {{open access}}</ref>
{{Clear left}}

===Caltrans era===
[[File:Passengers in Amtrak lounge car of San Joaquin (train) 2014.jpg|thumb|Passengers in the lounge seating area in the café car of a ''San Joaquins'' train, 2014]]
In 1979 Amtrak proposed discontinuing the ''San Joaquin'' as part of system-wide reductions ordered by the [[Carter administration]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Holsendolph |first1=Ernest |title=AMTRAK ELIMINATES 6 PASSENGER ROUTES TOTALING 5,000 MILES |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1979/08/30/archives/amtrak-eliminates-6-passenger-routes-totaling-5000-miles-trims-made.html |access-date=2025-04-12 |work=New York Times |date=1979-08-30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230408105739/https://www.nytimes.com/1979/08/30/archives/amtrak-eliminates-6-passenger-routes-totaling-5000-miles-trims-made.html |archive-date=2023-04-08}}</ref> The state of California stepped in to provide a yearly subsidy of (then) $700,000 (${{Format price|{{Inflation|US|700000|1979}}}} adjusted for inflation) to cover the train's operating losses, and it was retained. The state asked Amtrak to add a second round-trip between Oakland and Bakersfield and to extend the service south over the [[Tehachapi Pass]] to [[Los Angeles]].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-sacramento-bee/143425802/ |title=Caltrans Willing To Help Amtrak's 'San Joaquin' |first=James |last=Dufur |newspaper=The Sacramento Bee |date=September 1, 1979 |page=1 |via=Newspapers.com}}</ref> Amtrak added the second train on February 4, 1980, but attempts to extend the train over the Tehachapi Loop failed due to Southern Pacific's opposition.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-fresno-bee/143426041/ |title=Thankful load inaugurates Amtrak II |newspaper=The Fresno Bee |first=Gene |last=Kuhn |date=February 5, 1980 |page=2 |via=Newspapers.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=MaNcAAAAIBAJ&pg=3674,4189656 |title=Fixup funds are part of service proposal |date=March 21, 1980 |work=Merced Sun-Star |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130125062131/http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=MaNcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=XVgNAAAAIBAJ&pg=3674,4189656 |archive-date=January 25, 2013 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=TblcAAAAIBAJ&pg=6488,4314341 |title='San Joaquin' trains catching on |date=July 30, 1982 |work=Merced Sun-Star |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130124184813/http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=TblcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=zFgNAAAAIBAJ&pg=6488,4314341 |archive-date=January 24, 2013 |url-status=dead}}</ref>

A third round trip was added on December 17, 1989.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/oakland-tribune/143425248/ |title=Amtrak inaugurates 3rd train to San Joaquin |first=Charles |last=McCarthy |newspaper=Oakland Tribune |date=December 17, 1989 |page=21 |via=Newspapers.com}}</ref><ref name=2018bp />{{rp|15}} Two days later, southbound ''San Joaquin'' train 708 collided with a tractor-trailer rig at a crossing east of Stockton, killing the driver of the rig and two Amtrak engineers.<ref name="Stockton1989">{{cite news |title=Stockton Train Crash Kills 3, Injures Dozens |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1989-12-20-mn-608-story.html |work=Los Angeles Times |date=December 20, 1989 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210608155616/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1989-12-20-mn-608-story.html |archive-date=June 8, 2021}}</ref> A fourth round trip was added on October 25, 1992.<ref name=2018bp>{{cite web |url=https://sjjpa.com/wp-content/uploads/2018-SJJPA-Final-Business-Plan-Update.pdf |title=2018 Business Plan Update |publisher=San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority |date=2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181111044047/https://sjjpa.com/wp-content/uploads/2018-SJJPA-Final-Business-Plan-Update.pdf |archive-date=November 11, 2018}}</ref>{{rp|15}} On May 16, 1999, Amtrak added a Sacramento–Bakersfield round trip - the fifth daily ''San Joaquins'' service round trip.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/IRPS/IRPSno6.pdf |journal=Intercity Rail Passenger Systems Update |issue=6 |date=December 1999 |page=11 |title=Caltrans Increases Service}}</ref><ref name=2018bp />{{rp|15}} A second Sacramento–Bakersfield round trip was added on March 18, 2002, along with an infill station at {{amtk|Lodi}}.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-modesto-bee/143424912/ |title=Amtrak adds valley train |newspaper=Modesto Bee |date=March 15, 2002 |page=14 |via=Newspapers.com}}</ref><ref name=2018bp />{{rp|15}}<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.greatamericanstations.com/stations/lodi-ca-lod/ |title=Lodi, CA (LOD) |publisher=Amtrak |work=Great American Stations}}</ref>
{{Clear left}}

===Transfer to local control===
Expansion of the service would stagnate after 2002, and 10 years later, frustrated by what was perceived to be Caltrans' slow response to regional concerns, local leaders pushed lawmakers to allow local control of the ''San Joaquins'' service.<ref name="SJJPA Bee">{{cite news |last1=Sheehan |first1=Tim |title=Valley agency takes control of Amtrak San Joaquin trains |url=https://www.fresnobee.com/news/local/article25646398.html |access-date=2025-04-12 |work=The Fresno Bee |date=2015-06-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240921122724/https://www.fresnobee.com/news/local/article25646398.html |archive-date=2024-09-21}}</ref>

On September 29, 2012, Governor Jerry Brown signed Assembly Bill 1779, which enabled regional government agencies to form the San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority (SJJPA) to assume administration and management of the route, while the state of California would continue to fund operations.<ref>{{cite web |title=Bill Text - AB-1779 Intercity rail agreements. |url=https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201120120AB1779 |access-date=November 25, 2019 |work=leginfo.legislature.ca.gov}}</ref> Under the [[joint powers authority]] model, the service would be governed by a board composed of eight elected officials, appointed by an agency in each of the counties the train travels through. The governance structure was modeled after the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority, which has been operating the Capitol Corridor regional train in Northern California since 1998.<ref name="SJJPA Bee" />

The first SJJPA board meeting was held on March 22, 2013, to begin planning for the shift in control.<ref>{{cite web |title=Request for Proposals: Management and Administrative Service for the San Joaquins |url=https://caltransit.org/cta/assets/File/SJ%20Rail%20JPA%20RFP_Released%20on%205-31-13.pdf |publisher=San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority |access-date=2025-04-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250412190448/https://caltransit.org/cta/assets/File/SJ%20Rail%20JPA%20RFP_Released%20on%205-31-13.pdf |archive-date=2025-04-12 |format=pdf |date=2013-05-31}}</ref> In that time, the SJJPA board contracted with the [[Altamont Corridor Express|San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission]] to provide day-to-day management of the service and contracted with [[Amtrak]] to continue to operate the service and maintain the [[rolling stock]] (locomotives and passenger cars). Control of the ''San Joaquins'' shifted from Caltrans to the SJJPA on July 1, 2015.<ref name="SJJPA Bee" />

A fifth Oakland–Bakersfield round trip was added to the service on June 20, 2016, the first expansion of the service in more than 14 years.<ref name=2018bp />{{rp|15}}

Two years later, the SJJPA established an early-morning "Morning Express Service" between Fresno and Sacramento, allowing same-day trips to the state capitol for the first time, was expected to result in increased ridership from business travelers.<ref name=2018bp />{{rp|34}} The change was criticized by Bakersfield-area officials, because it required ending the last southbound train of the day in Fresno, reducing daily service to Bakersfield by one daily round trip.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Burger |first1=James |title=Amtrak reducing service from Bakersfield, shifting a train north in search of business travelers |url=https://www.bakersfield.com/news/amtrak-reducing-service-from-bakersfield-shifting-a-train-north-in/article_e021d7ca-99a6-11e7-b464-37123cc9e774.html |access-date=2025-04-12 |work=The Bakersfield Californian |date=2017-09-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231009142939/https://www.bakersfield.com/news/amtrak-reducing-service-from-bakersfield-shifting-a-train-north-in/article_e021d7ca-99a6-11e7-b464-37123cc9e774.html |archive-date=2023-10-09}}</ref> The service began on May 7, 2018, but proved to be unpopular, with ridership counts showing an average of just 50 people on the train, compared to 130 with the old timetable.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Holland |first1=Justin |title=Amtrak added a train to Sacramento for commuters in Modesto area. What went wrong? |url=https://www.modbee.com/news/article228902014.html |access-date=2025-04-12 |work=The Modesto Bee |date=2019-04-06 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210531182038/https://www.modbee.com/news/article228902014.html |archive-date=2021-05-31}}</ref> The "Morning Express Service" was eliminated one year later on May 6, 2019, and trains were reverted to their previous schedule.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Holland |first1=Justin |title=Amtrak canceled one train to Sacramento. Modesto bus system will try to fill gap |url=https://www.modbee.com/news/local/article230188069.html |access-date=2025-04-12 |date=2019-05-06 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210531180930/https://www.modbee.com/news/local/article230188069.html |archive-date=2021-05-31}}</ref>

Sacramento service was discontinued and one round-trip to Oakland was cancelled on March 25, 2020, amid the [[COVID-19 pandemic]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Shee |first1=Tim |title=Coronavirus slices Amtrak ridership, forcing reduction of Central California schedule |url=https://www.fresnobee.com/news/local/article241465591.html |work=The Fresno Bee |date=2020-03-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240705155533/https://www.fresnobee.com/news/local/article241465591.html |archive-date=2024-07-05}}</ref> The cancelled Oakland trip was restored on June 28, 2021,<ref>{{cite web |title=Amtrak San Joaquins Announces Upcoming Service Increase and Schedule Change |url=https://sjjpa.com/amtrak-san-joaquins-announces-upcoming-service-increase-and-schedule-change/ |publisher=San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority |access-date=2025-04-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241207001054/https://sjjpa.com/amtrak-san-joaquins-announces-upcoming-service-increase-and-schedule-change/ |archive-date=2024-12-07 |location=Stockton, CA |date=2021-06-22}}</ref> and one Sacramento round trip was restored on October 18, 2021.<ref>{{cite web |title=San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority 2022 Business Plan Update |url=https://cdn.sjjpa.com/wp-content/uploads/2022-SJJPA-Business-Plan-Update.pdf |publisher=San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority |access-date=2025-04-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230331224327/https://cdn.sjjpa.com/wp-content/uploads/2022-SJJPA-Business-Plan-Update.pdf |archive-date=2023-03-31 |date=2022}}</ref>{{rp|33}} {{As of|March 2025}}, the SJJPA anticipates restoring the second Sacramento round-trip by Fall 2025.<ref name="SJJPA 2025 Business Plan Draft">{{cite web |title=San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority 2025 Business Plan Update Public Review Draft |url=https://cdn.sjjpa.com/wp-content/uploads/20250311120849/2025-SJJPA-Business-Plan_Public-Review-Draft_DRAFT.pdf |publisher=San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority |access-date=2025-04-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250326190548/https://cdn.sjjpa.com/wp-content/uploads/20250311120849/2025-SJJPA-Business-Plan_Public-Review-Draft_DRAFT.pdf |archive-date=2025-03-26 |format=pdf |date=2025-03-11}}</ref>{{rp|5}}

{{Clear left}}

===Future===

====Near-term service adjustments====

{{As of|2025}}, the SJJPA is studying methods to reduce or eliminate crew expenses. The Authority aims to replace staffed café cars on the ''Gold Runner'' with more cost-effective alternatives; on May 5, 2025, all onboard food sales — including the sale of hot food and alcoholic drinks — were discontinued, and replaced with complimentary grab-and-go assortments of snacks and soft drinks. The change was billed as providing "[[Equity (economics)|equitable]] service across the board."<ref>{{Cite web |title=Onboard Drink & Snack Menu |url=https://amtraksanjoaquins.com/cafe-car-menu/ |access-date=2025-05-10 |website=Amtrak San Joaquins |language=en-US}}</ref> The SJJPA is exploring a long-term solution of installing automated vending machines on all trains<ref name="SJJPA 2025 Business Plan Draft"/>{{rp|9,55,62}} — similar to [[Automat#Rail_transport|automat]] cars historically used on Southern Pacific's ''San Joaquin Daylight''.

As well, Oakland to Bakersfield trips take just over six hours, which requires an expensive crew change in Merced; previously, the Authority investigated terminating some trains at Emeryville, skipping stops on some trains, increasing current {{convert|79|mph|adj=mid}} speeds to {{convert|90|mph}}, and/or operational improvements like decreasing dwell times,<ref name="2020BP">{{cite web |title=2020 Business Plan |url=https://sjjpa.com/wp-content/uploads/DRAFT-2020-SJJPA-Business-Plan-Update_Clean-Version.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200616174237/https://sjjpa.com/wp-content/uploads/DRAFT-2020-SJJPA-Business-Plan-Update_Clean-Version.pdf |archive-date=June 16, 2020 |access-date=May 16, 2020 |publisher=SJJPA}}</ref>{{rp|27}} but these proposals were later removed from the Authority's Business Plan Updates, from 2023 onward.

Under their operating agreement with Amtrak, the SJJPA is provided the rights to use the service mark "Amtrak ''San Joaquins''" from the railroad, free of charge; the Authority considers the service mark difficult for customers to spell, and believes it limits public understanding of the scope of the services provided by the Authority.<ref name="SJJPA 2025 Business Plan Draft"/>{{rp|56–57}} In March 2025, the Authority adopted a resolution to rebrand the service to the "''Gold Runner''",<ref name="March 2025 Board Meeting">{{cite web |title=San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority Special Board Meeting Mailout |url=https://cdn.sjjpa.com/wp-content/uploads/20250317100554/SJJPA-March-19-2025-Special-Board-Meeting_Mailout.pdf |publisher=San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority |access-date=2025-04-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250317183530/https://cdn.sjjpa.com/wp-content/uploads/20250317100554/SJJPA-March-19-2025-Special-Board-Meeting_Mailout.pdf |archive-date=2025-03-17 |format=pdf |date=2025-03-17}}</ref>{{rp|144–147}}<ref>{{Cite web |last=McAndrew |first=Dom |date=2025-09-26 |title=Amtrak’s Central Valley train service is getting a new name |url=https://www.yourcentralvalley.com/digital-enterprise/gold-runner-amtrak-central-valley/ |website=CBS47 and KSEE24 {{!}} News from YourCentralValley.com |language=en-US}}</ref> and the service was rebranded in November 2025.<ref name=":1" />

{{clear}}

====Long-term service advancements====
[[File:StatewideRailMod_BubbleMap_013013.jpg|right|thumb|2013 map of planned intercity rail improvements in California]]
{{As of|2025}}, the SJJPA is increasing capacity on its routes to avoid conflicts with freight trains and add additional trips as well as plan for connections to the [[California High-Speed Rail]] system. These improvements are being done in cooperation with [[Altamont Corridor Express]] (ACE) as part of the [[Valley Rail (ACE)|Valley Rail project]].

The [[Stockton Diamond]], a [[level junction]] in Stockton where the two ''Gold Runner'' routes diverge, was the busiest rail junction in the state by 2019. As part of the Valley Rail project, these lines will be grade separated: the north-south Union Pacific line is planned to be elevated over the BNSF line.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Wyatt |first1=Dennis |title=ACE COMING IN 2023: Downtown Manteca passenger service on track |url=https://www.mantecabulletin.com/news/local-news/manteca-says-it-lacks-manpower-enforce-county-covid-19-rules-then-issues-cease-desist-order/ |access-date=June 16, 2020 |agency=Manteca/Ripon Bulletin |date=March 7, 2020}}</ref><ref name=2020BP />{{rp|3}} This project is expected to finish construction in Summer 2027 (as of Dec 2024).<ref>{{Cite web |title=Stockton Diamond |url=https://stocktondiamond.com/ |access-date=2024-12-09 |website=stocktondiamond.com}}</ref>

[[File:ACE and San Joaquins routemap with Valley Rail extensions (semi-schematic).svg|thumb|left|upright=1.5|[[Altamont Corridor Express]], ''[[Capitol Corridor]]'', and ''San Joaquins'' schematic route map, with [[Valley Rail (ACE)|Valley Rail project]] extensions. The Sacramento Extension project segment, connecting Stockton and Sacramento, uses the [[Sacramento Subdivision]], which runs parallel to and west of the present route, which uses the [[Fresno Subdivision]].]]

Two additional Sacramento round trips are planned to be added, routed over the Union Pacific Railroad [[Sacramento Subdivision]] north of Stockton and west of the present route, which uses the Fresno Subdivision north of Stockton. Unlike the 1999-initiated route, the Sacramento Subdivision has spare capacity to allow the increased service.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Bizjak |first1=Tony |title=Catch an Amtrak toward L.A. from midtown Sacramento? Train officials propose new service. |url=https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/transportation/article177028481.html |access-date=2025-04-12 |work=The Sacramento Bee |date=2018-06-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210617202454/https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/transportation/article177028481.html |archive-date=2021-06-17}}</ref><ref name="SJJPA 2025 Business Plan Draft"/>{{rp|43}} Six new stations are planned: [[Lodi station (Altamont Corridor Express)|Lodi]] (distinct from the [[Lodi Transit Station]]), [[Elk Grove station|Elk Grove]], three locations in Sacramento, and [[Natomas/Sacramento Airport station|Natomas]].<ref name="ModestoMerced">{{cite news |last1=Holland |first1=John |title=Expanded train service coming to Modesto, Merced; what it means for commuters |url=https://www.modbee.com/news/article209941964.html |access-date=2025-04-12 |work=The Modesto Bee |date=2018-04-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240921122701/https://www.modbee.com/news/article209941964.html |archive-date=2024-09-21}}</ref> Trains operating on the Sacramento Subdivision route will not serve the existing [[Sacramento Valley Station]], but [[SacRT light rail]] connections and a shuttle bus to [[Sacramento International Airport]] are planned elsewhere.<ref name="SJJPA 2025 Business Plan Draft"/>{{rp|28}}

When the Valley Rail project is complete, ACE will share the route to Natomas from Stockton and add an additional branch south to [[Ceres, California|Ceres]] in 2023 with an extension to Merced in 2027.<ref>{{cite press release |url=http://www.acerail.com/About/News/2017/Valley-Rail-Project-Receives-Major-Grant-Funding-T |title=VALLEY RAIL PROJECT RECEIVES MAJOR GRANT FUNDING TODAY BY STATE |date=April 26, 2018 |publisher=San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority |access-date=November 10, 2018 |archive-date=November 11, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181111093242/http://www.acerail.com/About/News/2017/Valley-Rail-Project-Receives-Major-Grant-Funding-T |url-status=dead }}</ref> When the Natomas runs are initiated, one existing Oakland trip is planned to terminate at Stockton-Downtown, freeing a slot for a full Natomas to Bakersfield round-trip while continuing to provide five trips from the Bay Area.<ref name="SJJPA 2025 Business Plan Draft"/>{{rp|46–47}}

The San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority will serve as the high-speed rail service provider in the Valley per a memorandum of understanding with the [[California High-Speed Rail Authority]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Sheehan |first1=Tim |title=How many people will use California’s bullet train? Planners lower ridership estimates |url=https://www.fresnobee.com/news/local/high-speed-rail/article272636534.html |access-date=2025-04-12 |work=The Fresno Bee |date=2023-03-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314025057/https://www.fresnobee.com/news/local/high-speed-rail/article272636534.html |archive-date=2023-03-14}}</ref> Upon completion of the high-speed rail initial operating segment, trains are expected to terminate at that system's new [[Merced station (California High-Speed Rail)|Merced station]] to act as a feeder to high-speed service. A new rail link is planned to connect the BNSF and Union Pacific lines, to allow ''Gold Runner'' trains to access the new station directly.<ref name="SJJPA 2025 Business Plan Draft"/>{{rp|33,47}}Sacramento to Merced service is thus planned to increase in frequency to hourly service.<ref name=2020BP />{{rp|40}}

In December 2023, the [[Federal Railroad Administration]] accepted an application by Caltrans to enter the ''Gold Runner'' route into its [[Corridor Identification and Development Program]]. Proposed improvements include additional frequencies and an extension north to [[Chico, California|Chico]] and Redding. The program grants $500,000 toward service planning and prioritizes the corridor for future federal funding.<ref>{{cite web |title=FY22 Corridor Identification and Development Program Selections |url=https://railroads.dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/2023-12/FY22%20CID%20Project%20Summaries-Map-r1.pdf |website=railroads.dot.gov |publisher=[[Federal Railroad Administration]] |access-date=9 December 2023 |date=December 2023 |page=13}}</ref>

In 2024, the Butte County Association of Governments released a Strategic plan, named [[North Valley Rail]] to extend The San Joaquins service to Chico.<ref>{{cite web |title=North Valley Rail |url=https://northvalleyrail.org/ |website=North Valley Rail |publisher=Butte County Association of Governments |access-date=6 September 2024 |language=en}}</ref> Construction is expected to commence in 2029.<ref>{{cite web |title=North valley rail fact Sheet |url=https://northvalleyrail.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/nvprsp-fact-sheet-20230921.pdf |website=North Valley Rail |publisher=San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission |access-date=6 September 2024}}</ref> The SJJPA is investigating a further extension to [[Redding, California|Redding]].<ref name=2020BP />{{rp|40}}

Longer-term proposals include extending Oakland trains to [[Oakland Coliseum station]] to provide a connection to [[Oakland International Airport]] and an additional BART connection, routing some trains via the ACE route through the [[Tri-Valley]], and consolidating all Stockton service at either [[Robert J. Cabral Station]], or a station east of the developing Stockton Diamond junction.<ref name="SJJPA 2025 Business Plan Draft"/>{{rp|48–49}} The SJJPA is also working with Caltrans and the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority to develop a plan to enable some ''Gold Runner'' or ''Capitol Corridor'' services to be short-turned at Martinez.<ref name="SJJPA 2025 Business Plan Draft"/>{{rp|7,30,51}}

==Route==
[[File:Amtrak San Joaquin.svg|thumb|upright=1.3|''Gold Runner'' route map]]
The ''Gold Runner'' service runs from Bakersfield's [[Bakersfield station (Amtrak)|Truxtun Avenue station]] northward on [[BNSF Railway]]'s [[Mojave Subdivision]] within Bakersfield, the [[Bakersfield Subdivision]] from Bakersfield to [[Calwa, California|Calwa]] ([[Fresno, California|Fresno]]), then on the [[Stockton Subdivision]] from Calwa to [[Stockton, California|Stockton]].

At the [[Stockton Diamond]] the routes split to [[Oakland, California|Oakland]] or [[Sacramento, California|Sacramento]].

The Oakland trains continue west on the Stockton Subdivision to [[Port Chicago, California|Port Chicago]]. At Port Chicago they cross to the [[Union Pacific Railroad]]'s Tracy Subdivision to [[Martinez, California|Martinez]], continue on the [[Martinez Subdivision]] to [[Emeryville, California|Emeryville]], and finally travel a few miles on the Niles Subdivision to [[Oakland – Jack London Square station|Oakland's Jack London Square station]].

Trains to the [[Sacramento Valley Station]] diverge in Stockton and run north to Sacramento on Union Pacific's [[Fresno Subdivision]] and on the Martinez Subdivision within Sacramento.

If the tracks for the Central Valley segment of [[California High-Speed Rail]] (HSR) are completed prior to that system's full startup, there are calls for the ''Gold Runner'' trains to use the HSR infrastructure to speed up traditional rail service to 125&nbsp;mph.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Curry |first1=Melanie |title=High-Speed Rail Authority Updates Plan to Finish Central Valley Segment |url=https://cal.streetsblog.org/2019/05/02/high-speed-rail-authority-updates-plan-to-finish-central-valley-segment/ |access-date=November 25, 2019 |work=Streetsblog California |date=May 2, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Alexander |first1=Kurtis |title=California's high-speed rail might start with old-school diesel trains |url=https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/California-s-high-speed-rail-might-start-with-13812003.php |access-date=November 25, 2019 |work=[[San Francisco Chronicle]] |date=May 2, 2019}}</ref>

The route is Amtrak's seventh-busiest service in the nation and the railroad's third-busiest in the state of California.<ref name=":0" />

{{clear}}

== Stations ==
The entire route is located in the [[U.S. state]] of [[California]].<br>

The ''Gold Runner'' service has an extensive network of dedicated [[Amtrak Thruway]] buses. Over 55% of passengers on the route used an Amtrak Thruway bus on at least one end of their trip.<ref name="buses" /> 
{{sticky header}}
{| class="wikitable sticky-header-multi" 
! rowspan=2|Station
! colspan=2|Service
! rowspan=2|Connections
|-
!{{abbr|OKJ|Oakland – Jack London Square}}
!{{abbr|SAC|Sacramento Valley Station}}
|-
|{{amtk|Sacramento}}
|
|style="text-align:center"|●
|{{Unbulleted list
   | {{rint|us|amtrak}} Amtrak: {{lnl|Amtrak|California Zephyr}}, {{lnl|Amtrak|Capitol Corridor}}, {{lnl|Amtrak|Coast Starlight}}
   | {{rint|bus}} Amtrak Thruway: [[Amtrak Thruway#3|3]] ({{amtk|Redding}}–Stockton), [[Amtrak Thruway#20|20]] ({{amtk|Reno}}), [[Amtrak Thruway#20C|20C]] ([[South Lake Tahoe, California|South Lake Tahoe]])
   | {{rint|Sacramento}} [[SacRT light rail|SacRT]]: {{rcb|SacRT|Gold|inline=route}}
   | {{bus icon}} [[El Dorado Transit]], [[Sacramento Regional Transit District|Sacramento RT]]
   }}
|-
|{{amtk|Lodi}}
|
|style="text-align:center"|●
|{{Unbulleted list
   | {{rint|bus}} Amtrak Thruway: 3 (Redding–Sacramento–Stockton)
   | {{bus icon}} Lodi GrapeVine, [[San Joaquin RTD]], [[South County Transit]]
   | {{rint|bus}} [[Greyhound Lines|Greyhound]]
   }}
|-
|{{amtk|Stockton–Downtown}}
|
|style="text-align:center"|●
|{{Unbulleted list
   | {{rint|bus}} Amtrak Thruway: 3 (Redding–Sacramento), [[Amtrak Thruway#6|6]] ({{amtk|San Jose}})
   | {{rint|ace}} [[Altamont Corridor Express]]
   | {{bus icon}} San Joaquin RTD
   }}
|-
|{{amtk|Oakland}}
|style="text-align:center"|●
|
|{{Unbulleted list
   | {{rint|us|amtrak}} Amtrak: ''Coast&nbsp;Starlight'', ''Capitol&nbsp;Corridor''
   | {{rint|bus}} Amtrak Thruway: [[Amtrak Thruway#17|17]] ({{amtk|San Luis Obispo}}–San Jose–{{amtk|Santa Barbara}})
   | {{bus icon}} [[AC Transit]]
   }}
|-
|{{amtk|Emeryville}}
|style="text-align:center"|●
|
|{{Unbulleted list
   | {{rint|us|amtrak}} Amtrak: ''California&nbsp;Zephyr'', ''Capitol&nbsp;Corridor'', ''Coast&nbsp;Starlight''
   | {{rint|bus}} Amtrak Thruway: [[Amtrak Thruway#99|99]] ([[San Francisco]])
   | {{bus icon}} AC Transit, [[Emery Go-Round]]
   }}
|-
|{{amtk|Richmond}}
|style="text-align:center"|●
|
|{{Unbulleted list
   | {{rint|us|amtrak}} Amtrak: ''California&nbsp;Zephyr'', ''Capitol&nbsp;Corridor''
   | {{rint|bart}} [[Bay Area Rapid Transit|BART]]: {{ric|BART|Orange|name=yes}}, {{ric|BART|Red|name=yes}}
   | {{bus icon}} [[AC Transit]]
   | {{rint|bus}} [[Flixbus]]
   }}
|-
|{{amtk|Martinez}}
|style="text-align:center"|●
| 
|{{Unbulleted list
   | {{rint|us|amtrak}} Amtrak: ''California&nbsp;Zephyr'', ''Capitol&nbsp;Corridor'', ''Coast&nbsp;Starlight''
   | {{rint|bus}} Amtrak Thruway: [[Amtrak Thruway#7|7]] ([[Soscol Gateway Transit Center|Napa]]–[[Coddingtown Mall|Santa Rosa]]–[[Arcata Transit Center|Arcata]])
   | {{bus icon}} [[County Connection]], [[Tri Delta Transit]], [[WestCAT]]
   }}
|-
|{{amtk|Antioch–Pittsburg}}{{efn|name=Oakley-Antioch}}
|style="text-align:center"|●
|
|{{bus icon}} Tri Delta Transit
|-
|''{{amtk|Oakley}}''{{efn|name=Oakley-Antioch|[[Oakley station (California)|Oakley station]] is under construction, and will replace {{amtk|Antioch–Pittsburg}} when complete.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.thepress.net/news/oakley/antioch-loses-amtrak-station-to-oakley/article_5e70fd78-ce7a-11ed-a339-efc3d32d0799.html |title=Antioch loses Amtrak station to Oakley |first=Chris |last=Campos |date=March 29, 2023 |work=The Press |access-date=2 November 2024}}</ref>}}
|style="text-align:center"|●
|
|{{bus icon}} Tri Delta Transit
|-
|{{amtk|Stockton–San Joaquin Street}}
|style="text-align:center"|●
|
|{{Unbulleted list
   | {{rint|bus}} Amtrak Thruway: 3 (Redding–Sacramento), 6 (San Jose)
   | {{bus icon}} San Joaquin RTD
   }}
|-
|{{amtk|Modesto}}
|style="text-align:center"|●
|style="text-align:center"|●
|{{bus icon}} [[Stanislaus Regional Transit Authority|StanRTA]]
|-
|{{amtk|Turlock–Denair}}
|style="text-align:center"|●
|style="text-align:center"|●
|
|-
|{{amtk|Merced}}
|style="text-align:center"|●
|style="text-align:center"|●
|{{Unbulleted list
   | {{rint|bus}} Amtrak Thruway: [[Amtrak Thruway#15A|15A]] ([[Yosemite National Park]])
   | {{bus icon}} [[CatTracks]], [[Merced County Transit|The Bus]], [[Yosemite Area Regional Transportation System|YARTS]]
   }}
|-
|{{amtk|Madera}}
|style="text-align:center"|●
|style="text-align:center"|●
|
|-
|{{amtk|Fresno}}
|style="text-align:center"|●
|style="text-align:center"|●
|{{Unbulleted list
   | {{rint|bus}} Amtrak Thruway: [[Amtrak Thruway#15B|15B]] (Yosemite National Park)
   | {{bus icon}} [[Fresno Area Express|FAX]], [[Fresno County Rural Transit Agency|FCRTA]], YARTS
   | {{rint|bus}} Greyhound
   }}
|-
|{{amtk|Hanford}}
|style="text-align:center"|●
|style="text-align:center"|●
|{{Unbulleted list
   | {{rint|bus}} Amtrak Thruway: [[Amtrak Thruway#18|18]] ([[Central Coast (California)|Central Coast]]–[[Visalia, California|Visalia]])
   | {{bus icon}} [[Kings Area Regional Transit|KART]]
   | {{rint|bus}} Greyhound
   }}
|-
|{{amtk|Corcoran}}
|style="text-align:center"|●
|style="text-align:center"|●
|{{bus icon}} Corcoran Area Transit, KART
|-
|{{amtk|Colonel Allensworth State Historic Park}}{{efn|name=limited|group=station|Limited service by appointment only for groups of 20 or more}}
|style="text-align:center"|●
|style="text-align:center"|●
|
|-
|{{amtk|Wasco}}
|style="text-align:center"|●
|style="text-align:center"|●
| {{bus icon}} [[Kern Transit]]
|-
|{{amtk|Bakersfield}}
|style="text-align:center"|●
|style="text-align:center"|●
|{{Unbulleted list
   | {{rint|bus}} Amtrak Thruway: [[Amtrak Thruway#1|1]] ({{amtk|Los Angeles}}), [[Amtrak Thruway#10|10]] ({{amtk|Santa Barbara}}–[[Las Vegas]]), [[Amtrak Thruway#19|19]] ([[Inland Empire]])
   | {{bus icon}} [[Golden Empire Transit]], Kern Transit
   | {{rint|bus}} Greyhound
   }}
|}

== Statistics ==

=== Annual ridership ===

{| class="wikitable collapsible"
|- style="font-size:95%; text-align:center"
! style="border-bottom:1px solid black" | {{abbr|FY|Fiscal Year (starts October 1 of previous calendar year)}}* || style="border-bottom:1px solid black"| Ridership || style="border-bottom:1px solid black;" | {{abbr|%±|Percent change}}
! rowspan="10" | {{nnbsp}}
! style="border-bottom:1px solid black" | {{abbr|FY|Fiscal Year (starts October 1 of previous calendar year)}}* || style="border-bottom:1px solid black"| Ridership || style="border-bottom:1px solid black;" | {{abbr|%±|Percent change}}
|- style="text-align:center;"
! 2024
| {{formatnum: 909,551}}<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=December 3, 2024 |title=Amtrak FY24 Ridership |url=https://media.amtrak.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/FY24-Year-End-Ridership-Fact-Sheet.pdf }}</ref>
| {{increase}}7.3%
!2015
|{{formatnum: 1177073 }}<ref name="fy15">{{Cite web |date=June 29, 2016 |title=Amtrak FY15 Ridership & Revenue |url=http://media.amtrak.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/UPDATED-FY15-Amtrak-ridership-and-revenue-fact-sheet-7_5_16.pdf |access-date=May 11, 2018 |website=Amtrak}}</ref>
|{{decrease}}{{0}}0.9%
|- style="text-align:center;"
! 2023
| {{formatnum: 847,364}}<ref>{{Cite web |date=December 1, 2023 |title=Amtrak Route Ridership FY23 vs. FY22 |url=https://media.amtrak.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Amtrak-Fiscal-Year-2023-Ridership.pdf }}</ref>
| {{increase}}19.3%
!2014
|{{formatnum: 1188228 }}<ref name="fy15" />
|{{decrease}}{{0}}2.6%
|- style="text-align:center;"
! 2022
| {{formatnum: 710051}}<ref>{{cite web |title=Amtrak Route Ridership FY22 vs. FY21 |url=https://media.amtrak.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/FY22-Year-End-Revenue-and-Ridership.pdf |publisher=Amtrak |access-date=November 29, 2022}}</ref>
| {{increase}}63.6%
!2013
|{{formatnum: 1219818 }}<ref name="fy13">{{Cite press release |title=Amtrak Sets Ridership Record and Moves the Nation's Economy Forward |date=October 14, 2013 |publisher=Amtrak |url=http://s4prc.org/sites/default/files/media/FY13-Record-Ridership-ATK-13-122.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180511150032/http://s4prc.org/sites/default/files/media/FY13-Record-Ridership-ATK-13-122.pdf |archive-date=May 11, 2018}}</ref>
|{{increase}}{{0}}6.6%
|- style="text-align:center;"
! 2021
| {{formatnum: 434099}}<ref>{{cite web |title=Amtrak Route Ridership FY21 vs. FY19 |url=http://media.amtrak.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/FY21-Year-End-Revenue-and-Ridership.pdf |publisher=Amtrak |access-date=April 19, 2022}}</ref>
| {{decrease}}28.5%
!2012
|{{formatnum: 1144616 }}<ref name="fy12">{{Cite press release |title=Amtrak Sets New Ridership Record |date=October 10, 2012 |publisher=Amtrak |url=https://www.amtrak.com/ccurl/636/294/Amtrak-Sets-New-Ridership-Record-FY2012-ATK-12-092.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121011005910/https://www.amtrak.com/ccurl/636/294/Amtrak-Sets-New-Ridership-Record-FY2012-ATK-12-092.pdf |archive-date=October 11, 2012}}</ref>
|{{increase}}{{0}}7.2%
|- style="text-align:center;"
! 2020
| {{formatnum: 606728 }}<ref name=FY1920>{{cite news|url=https://www.railwayage.com/passenger/high-performance/amtrak-releases-fy-2020-data/|title=Amtrak Releases FY 2020 Data|last=Luczak|first=Marybeth|date=November 23, 2020|access-date=February 18, 2020|newspaper=Railway Age|publisher=Simmons-Boardman Publishing Inc.|location=New York|archive-date=November 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124113634/https://www.railwayage.com/passenger/high-performance/amtrak-releases-fy-2020-data/|url-status=live}}</ref>
| {{decrease}}43.4%
!2011
|1,067,441<ref name="fy11">{{Cite press release |title=Amtrak Ridership Rolls up Best-Ever Records |date=October 13, 2011 |url=http://www.amtrak.com/ccurl/968/399/ATK-11-133%20Record%20FY11%20Ridership%20and%20Revenue.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121108035837/http://www.amtrak.com/ccurl/968/399/ATK-11-133%20Record%20FY11%20Ridership%20and%20Revenue.pdf |archive-date=November 8, 2012}}</ref>
|{{increase}}{{0}}9.2%
|- style="text-align:center;"
! 2019
| {{formatnum: 1071190 }}<ref name="FY19 Ridership" />
| {{decrease}}{{0}}0.7%
!2010
|977,834<ref name="fy10">{{Cite press release |title=Amtrak Sets New Ridership Record, Thanks Passengers for Taking the Train |date=October 11, 2010 |url=https://seattletransitblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Amtrak_ATK-10-134_Amtrak_Sets_Ridership_.pdf |via=Seattle Transit Blog |access-date=August 31, 2024}}</ref>
|{{increase}}{{0}}5.2%
|- style="text-align:center;"
! 2018
| {{formatnum: 1078707 }}<ref name="FY19 Ridership">{{cite web |date=October 1, 2019 |title=Amtrak FY19 Ridership Fact Sheet |url=http://media.amtrak.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/FY19-Year-End-Ridership.pdf |access-date=November 24, 2019 |publisher=[[Amtrak]]}}</ref>
| {{decrease}}{{0}}3.7%
!2009
|929,172<ref name="fy09">{{Cite press release |title=Amtrak Posts Second-Best Ridership in History |date=October 12, 2009 |url=https://seattletransitblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Amtrak_ATK-09-074_FY09_Ridership_and_Revenue.pdf |via=Seattle Transit Blog |access-date=August 31, 2024}}</ref>
|{{decrease}}{{0}}2.2%
|- style="text-align:center;"
! 2017
| {{formatnum: 1120037 }}<ref name="fy17">{{Cite web |url=http://media.amtrak.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/FY17-Ridership-Fact-Sheet-Final.pdf |title=Amtrak Fact Sheet, Fiscal Year 2017: State of California |date=November 2017 |page=5 |access-date=May 11, 2018 |archive-date=November 19, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171119033231/http://media.amtrak.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/FY17-Ridership-Fact-Sheet-Final.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref>
| {{decrease}}{{0}}0.2%
!2008
|949,611<ref name="fy08">{{Cite press release |title=Heartland Flyer Ridership Rises Again, Amtrak Posts Another Record |date=October 31, 2008 |publisher=[[Oklahoma Department of Transportation]] |url=https://www.odot.org/newsmedia/press/2008/08-067_heartland_flyer_ridership_rises_again.pdf |access-date=August 31, 2024}}</ref>
|{{increase}}18.0%
|- style="text-align:center;"
! 2016
| {{formatnum: 1122301 }}<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.amtrak.com/content/dam/projects/dotcom/english/public/documents/corporate/statefactsheets/CALIFORNIA16.pdf |title=Amtrak Fact Sheet, Fiscal Year 2016: State of California |date=November 2016 |page=5 |access-date=May 11, 2018}}</ref>
| {{decrease}}{{0}}4.7%
!2007
|804,785<ref name="fy08" />
|{{n/a}}
|}

== Rolling stock ==
For its first two years of operation, the ''San Joaquin'' used single-level coaches Amtrak had inherited from other railroads. In October 1976, Amtrak introduced new [[Amfleet]] coaches to the service.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/643835872.html?dids=643835872:643835872&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&type=historic&date=Oct+18%2C+1976&author=&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=Amtrak+Will+Introduce+New+Rail+Cars&pqatl=google |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130201042141/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/643835872.html?dids=643835872:643835872&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&type=historic&date=Oct+18,+1976&author=&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=Amtrak+Will+Introduce+New+Rail+Cars&pqatl=google |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 1, 2013 |title=Amtrak will introduce new rail cars |date=October 18, 1976 |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |access-date=December 31, 2012 |page=B17A}}</ref> From 1987 to 1989 Amtrak used [[Superliner (railcar)|Superliner]] and ex-ATSF [[Hi-Level]] coaches.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2245&dat=19870221&id=M5szAAAAIBAJ&pg=6218,6599789 |title=Amtrak ridership up on San Joaquin line |date=February 21, 1987 |work=Lodi News-Sentinel |access-date=December 31, 2012}}</ref> For a short period beginning on June 15, 1987, this included a full [[dining car]] on one of the trains.<ref>{{Harvnb|California|1988|p=59}}</ref> Amtrak reequipped the ''San Joaquins'' trains again in 1989, this time with new [[Horizon (railcar)|Horizon]] coaches, when service expanded to three daily round-trips.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=O5kzAAAAIBAJ&pg=5532,7212125 |title=Valley gets added service |date=December 18, 1989 |work=Lodi News-Sentinel |access-date=December 31, 2012}}</ref> The ''San Joaquins'' began receiving Superliner-derived, bi-level [[California Car (railcar)|California Cars]] in 1995.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-modesto-bee/144531265/ |title=Sleek train debuts |last=Cabanatuan |first=Michael |date=June 23, 1995 |newspaper=Modesto Bee |pages=B{{hyphen}}1, [https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-modesto-bee/144531275/ B{{hyphen}}2] |via=Newspapers.com}}</ref> The bi-level fleet was supplemented by a fleet of single-level [[Comet (railcar)|Comet Cars]] (refurbished [[NJ Transit Rail Operations|NJ Transit]] cars) between 2013 and 2024.<ref name="SJJPA" /> Between 2024 and 2026, both the bi-level and Comet Car fleets are expected to be replaced by single-level [[Siemens Venture]] trainsets.

Daily inspections, cleaning, and maintenance of equipment are conducted in Oakland, Bakersfield, and Sacramento. Heavy maintenance is performed by Transit Services America in Stockton. Previously, all maintenance took place in Oakland, but both the ''Capitol Corridor'' and ''San Joaquins'' voted to shift to a new contractor in 2023, citing the contractor's ability to adhere to high maintenance quality and cleanliness and be more agile with overhaul projects.<ref name="SJJPA Business Plan" /><ref>{{Cite web |date=January 2024 |title=Public Review Draft 2024 CCJPA Business Plan Update |url=https://www.capitolcorridor.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/CCJPA-DRAFT-FY25-FY26-Annual-Business-Plan-Jan-2024.pdf |website=Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority  |page=18}}</ref>

The San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission selected Herzog Transit Services for maintenance of cars and locomotives in 2025.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Johnston |first=Bob |date=September 29, 2025 |title=Maintenance responsibilities shift for San Joaquins |url=https://www.trains.com/pro/passenger/intercity/maintenance-responsibilities-shift-for-san-joaquins/ |work=Trains |language=en-US}}</ref>

=== Locomotives ===
[[File:San Joaquin and Capitol Corridor at Emeryville, June 2018.JPG|thumb|A ''San Joaquins'' train powered by a [[Siemens Charger]] (left) and ''Capitol Corridor'' powered by a [[EMD F59PH#F59PHI|F59PHI]] (right) at Emeryville station, June 2018]]
The ''Gold Runner'' and ''Capitol Corridor'' share a combined fleet of 13 [[EMD F59PHI]] and ten [[Siemens Charger]] SC-44 locomotives.<ref name="SJJPA Business Plan">{{Cite web |title=Public Review Draft 2024 SJJPA Business Plan Update |url=https://cdn.sjjpa.com/wp-content/uploads/20240305161430/DRAFT-2024-SJJPA-Business-Plan-Update_Public-Review.pdf |access-date=2024-03-08 |website=San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority |pages=18–21}}</ref>

The Charger locomotives meet EPA Tier IV emission standards and are capable of operating at 125 mph in revenue service.<ref name="SJJPA Business Plan" /> Many of the F59PHI have been re-engined to meet more stringent EPA Tier II emission standards.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Vantuono |first=William C. |date=July 16, 2009 |title=Caltrans touts EMD "green" machines |url=https://www.railwayage.com/news/caltrans-touts-emd-green-machines/ |access-date=March 8, 2024 |work=Railway Age}}</ref>

These locomotives are owned by Caltrans and carry its CDTX [[reporting mark]]s. Amtrak-owned locomotives are also occasionally used on the ''Gold Runner'', including the [[GE Genesis#P42DC|P42DC]].
{{Clear}}
{{Anchor|California Cars}}

=== California and Surfliner Car bi-level trainsets ===
[[File:Fresno station 2425 26.JPG|250px|thumbnail|A bi-level "California Car" trainset on the ''San Joaquins'' at {{amtk|Fresno}} station in 2012|alt=]]
The ''Gold Runner'' service is equipped with [[Amtrak California]]'s fleet of [[California Car (railcar)|California Car]] bi-level, high-capacity passenger cars owned by [[Caltrans]]. Each trainset typically consists of two coach cars, a coach/baggage car, a café (food service) car, and a cab/coach car. The [[cab car|cab/coach car]] is similar to other coaches but with an engineer's operating cab and headlights on one end, allowing the train to be operated in [[Push-pull train|push-pull mode]], which eliminates the need to turn the train at each end-point. Each California Car is named for a geographic feature of California — the coaches for rivers, the coach/baggage cars for bays, the cafés for valleys, and the cab/coach cars for mountains. Caltrans is in the process of refitting the cab/coach cars to have a space on the car's lower level for storage for checked luggage and bikes.

Caltrans also owns several second-generation [[Surfliner (railcar)|Surfliner]] bi-level cars that are used on some ''Gold Runner'' trainsets. The newer cars look very similar to the California Car fleet, but feature reclining seats, open overhead luggage racks, and a restroom on the upper level of each car. There are several kinds of Surfliner Cars in service on ''Gold Runner'' trains: coach cars, cab/baggage/coach cars, and café cars. These follow a similar naming convention as the California Cars, with the Surfliner cafés named for California islands, the coach cars named for beaches, and the cab cars for peninsulas, or "points".

The bi-level fleet is pooled between the ''Gold Runner'' and ''Capitol Corridor'' routes. The cars have doors which can be operated remotely on either side of the train from a single point of control. This feature allows the operator to maximize passenger flow in boarding and alighting operations, and minimize station dwell time.<ref name="SJJPA Business Plan" />{{Clear}}
=== {{Anchor|Comet Cars}}Comet IB single-level trainsets ===
[[File:California Comets at Martinez station, November 2019.JPG|thumbnail|250px|A single-level "Comet car" trainset on the ''San Joaquins'' in 2019|alt=]]
Increasing ridership on the ''San Joaquins'' service led Caltrans to purchase 14 [[Comet (railcar)#Comet IB|Comet IB]] rail cars from [[New Jersey Transit]] in 2008 for $75,000 each. The former commuter cars were refurbished and reconfigured by Amtrak's [[Beech Grove Shops]] to serve as intercity coaches at a cost of approximately $20 million. The refurbished cars have reclining seats with tray tables and two power outlets for each seat pair; additionally, each car features Wi-Fi, luggage racks, waste receptacles, restrooms, and table seating.<ref name="SJJPA">{{Cite web |url=http://www.acerail.com/About/Regional-Governance-for-San-Joaquin-Rail-Service/Previous-SJJPA-Board-Meetings/Complete-SJJPA-May-2013-Packet.pdf |title=San Joaquin Rolling Stock Presentation |last=San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority/Caltrans |pages=35–42 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105095505/http://www.acerail.com/About/Regional-Governance-for-San-Joaquin-Rail-Service/Previous-SJJPA-Board-Meetings/Complete-SJJPA-May-2013-Packet.pdf |archive-date=November 5, 2013 |url-status=dead |access-date=June 30, 2013}}</ref>

Caltrans had planned to use the Comet trainsets beginning July 2013, but their refurbishment took longer than expected. The first Comet trainset entered revenue service on October 21, 2013,<ref>{{Cite press release |title=San Joaquin Trains 711 and 718: Operate with Refurbished Equipment |publisher=Amtrak |url=http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/ContentServer?c=AM_Alert_C&pagename=am/AM_Alert_C/Alerts_Popup&cid=1251624886764 |access-date=October 22, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131024214436/http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/ContentServer?c=AM_Alert_C&pagename=am%2FAM_Alert_C%2FAlerts_Popup&cid=1251624886764 |archive-date=October 24, 2013}}</ref> and the second trainset followed on April 15, 2014. The Comet sets replaced two bi-level ''San Joaquins'' consists, and the California Cars from these trainsets were then added to the remaining ''San Joaquins'' bi-level trains, as well as several ''Capitol Corridor'' trains.<ref name="SJJPA" />

Caltrans previously paid to lease three [[Horizon (railcar)|Horizon]] dinettes, to serve as café cars on Comet trainsets.<ref name="SJJPA" /> The Horizon dinettes were returned to Amtrak, as a consequence of service cuts in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and conductors later offered complimentary snacks and water bottles instead.

Presently, one Comet car has been added to each of the bi-level trainsets on the ''Gold Runner'' service, to meet minimum train lengths imposed by BNSF Railway — in this use, the Comet cars do not carry passengers.<ref name="SJJPA Business Plan" /> BNSF requires ''Gold Runner'' trains to have a minimum of 28 axles to protect against [[track circuit]] malfunctions, an issue known as "[[Track circuit#Failure modes and prevention|loss of shunt]]." When not properly mitigated, loss of shunt can interfere with the safe operation of [[Signalling block system|block signaling]] systems, and can prevent [[Level crossing signals|grade crossing signals]] from activating.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Johnston |first=Bob |date=September 5, 2023 |title=The quest to counteract 'loss of shunt:' Special Report |url=https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/the-quest-to-counteract-loss-of-shunt-special-report/ |access-date=2024-07-15 |website=Trains |language=en-US}}</ref>

Caltrans plans to reassign the Comet cars to services in Southern California after delivery of the Siemens Venture cars is complete.<ref name="SJJPA Business Plan" /> In June 2024, seven of the Comet cars entered service on the ''Pacific Surfliner''.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Gillman |first1=Alex |title=Former NJ Transit coaches boost Pacific Surfliner |url=https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/former-nj-transit-coaches-boost-pacific-surfliner/ |work=Trains Magazine |access-date=2025-04-11 |date=2025-02-27}}</ref>

=== Siemens Venture single-level trainsets ===
[[File:Venture test train at Oakland Maintenance Facility (2), July 2020.JPG|alt=|thumb|A Siemens Venture test train]]
In November 2017, [[Caltrans]] announced that it would be ordering seven [[Siemens Venture]] trainsets through its contractor [[Sumitomo Corporation]].<ref>{{Cite press release|title=Caltrans Amends Multimillion Dollar, Multi-State Railcar Contract|date=November 8, 2017|publisher=Caltrans|url=http://www.dot.ca.gov/paffairs/pr/2017/prs/17pr117.html|access-date=August 13, 2020|archive-date=November 9, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171109191241/http://www.dot.ca.gov/paffairs/pr/2017/prs/17pr117.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> The state had initially contracted Sumitomo, which in turn subcontracted with [[Nippon Sharyo]], to build the [[Next Generation Bi-Level Passenger Rail Car]], but a prototype car failed a [[buff strength]] test in August 2015. After the test failure, Sumitomo canceled its contract with Nippon Sharyo, and turned to Siemens to be the new subcontractor.

Unlike the bi-level equipment, the Venture cars will be used exclusively on the ''Gold Runner'' service. Caltrans has ordered 49 cars, forming seven total trainsets of seven cars each: five coaches, a café car, and one cab-control car with passenger seating and a compartment for checked baggage.<ref>{{Cite web |date=February 2018 |title=Caltrans/IDOT New Single-Level Passenger Railcar presentation |url=https://ngec.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/NGEC_annual-meeting-2018_CALIDOT-presentation.pdf |access-date=March 9, 2024}}</ref> The Venture consists are semi-permanently [[Railway coupling|coupled]] trainsets, which allows for wider [[Gangway connection|gangways]] between cars — thus providing mobility-impaired passengers access to the entire train.<ref name="SJJPA 2025 Business Plan Draft"/>{{rp|24}} Like the bi-level cars, the Venture trainsets have doors that can be operated remotely on either side of the train from a single point of control. To accommodate the low-level platforms along the line, the Venture cars also have automatically deployed stair steps. These features maximize passenger flow in boarding and alighting operations, and minimize station dwell time.<ref name="SJJPA 2025 Business Plan Draft"/>{{rp|23}}

Though the Venture trainsets are designed for use at high-platform stations, all stations on the ''Gold Runner'' route have low-platforms; to increase accessibility for mobility-impaired passengers, the SJJPA is exploring the modification of all stations to include two [[Railway platform height#United States|mini-high platforms]]. These platforms will be short lengths of high platform, each long enough for one Venture vestibule, with an accessible ramp up from the low platform;<ref>{{Cite web|date=May 31, 2019|title=Board Meeting Presentation|url=https://sjjpa.com/wp-content/uploads/SJJPA-Board-Meeting-May-31-2019-Presentation-2.pdf|access-date=August 13, 2020|publisher=San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority|pages=23–28|archive-date=May 31, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210531180432/https://sjjpa.com/wp-content/uploads/SJJPA-Board-Meeting-May-31-2019-Presentation-2.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> in conjunction with the mini-high platforms, Caltrans is designing a portable bridge plate to be carried aboard the cars. Additionally, the SJJPA has directed Siemens to procure electrically-operated car-borne wheelchair lifts, to replace the hand-cranked lifts currently utilized by each ''Gold Runner'' station.<ref name="SJJPA 2025 Business Plan Draft"/>{{rp|24}}

[[File:San Joaquin train.jpg|thumb|Siemens Venture trainset on the Amtrak ''San Joaquins'' route between Modesto and Turlock in 2025]]

The first trainset was intended to enter revenue service in 2020,<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Gradinger |first1=Kyle |last2=Tamaoki |first2=Momoko |date=February 21, 2020 |title=Multi-state Single Level Rail Cars Procurement Updates |url=http://www.highspeed-rail.org/Documents/Multi-state%20Single%20Level%20Rail%20Cars%20%20Procurement%20Update.pdf |access-date=May 15, 2020 |publisher=Caltrans Division of Rail and Mass Transportation |archive-date=September 22, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200922235019/http://www.highspeed-rail.org/Documents/Multi-state%20Single%20Level%20Rail%20Cars%20%20Procurement%20Update.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> though Caltrans only began accepting deliveries of the new rolling stock in late 2022,<ref>{{cite news |last1=Courtney |first1=Ricky |date=September 29, 2022 |title=All Aboard! New train cars for the San Joaquins route to roll down Central California tracks |url=https://abc30.com/amtrak-san-joaquins-train-new-cars/12279868/ |access-date=October 29, 2022 |agency=ABC30}}</ref> and the first set entered service on December 21, 2023.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-12-30 |title=Top 10 stories of 2023, No. 4: Amtrak's ongoing capacity issues |url=https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/top-10-stories-of-2023-no-4-amtraks-ongoing-capacity-issues/ |access-date=2024-01-24 |website=Trains |language=en-US}}</ref> As of 2025, four trainsets — each comprising six coach cars, and either one locomotive and one leased Amtrak NPCU, or two locomotives arranged [[Top and tail|top-and-tail]] — rotate through revenue service on the ''Gold Runner''; contingent on the delivery of the cab-control cars, the SJJPA anticipates all seven trainsets to be available for revenue service by mid-2026.<ref name="SJJPA 2025 Business Plan Draft"/>{{rp|5}} The Authority has not yet disclosed a date for the café or cab-control equipment to enter service, though they are investigating the use of unstaffed vending machines to provide food service on their Venture sets; presently, the only food service available on Venture sets are "Snack Stations" — grab-and-go selections of complimentary snacks and beverages.<ref name="SJJPA 2025 Business Plan Draft"/>{{rp|9,55}}

{{clear}}

=== Non-Powered Control Units ===

[[File:Amtrak 90225 at Martinez station, November 2019.JPG|thumb|Amtrak NPCU 90225 ''Sacramento'' with a Comet trainset, November 2019]]

In 2013, Caltrans paid Amtrak for the refurbishment of three [[Control car#Converted locomotives|non-powered control units]] (NPCUs) from Amtrak, for use on the ''San Joaquins'' service.<ref name="SJJPA 2025 Business Plan Draft"/>{{rp|6,23,55}} These are ex-[[EMD F40PH]] locomotives, which have had their prime movers and traction motors removed, and the control stand in the cab left in place; a floor and retrofitted roll-up side-doors allow for baggage service, leading to the nickname "cabbages" — a [[Blend word|portmanteau]] of "cab" and "baggage".<ref>{{cite web |last1=Guss |first1=Chris |title=Amtrak NPCU ‘Cabbage’ locomotives |url=https://www.trains.com/trn/railroads/locomotives/amtrak-npcu-cabbage-locomotives/ |work=Trains Magazine |access-date=2025-04-11 |date=2024-11-04}}</ref> These NPCUs were painted in a striped blue-and-teal livery, reminiscent of a paint scheme formerly used by [[Caltrain]], and each was named for the terminal stations on the ''San Joaquins'' route — ''Bakersfield'', ''Oakland'', and ''Sacramento''.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Stroshane |first1=Alex |last2=Donnelly |first2=Matt |title=EMD F40PH Masterclass |url=https://rapidotrains.com/emd-f40ph-master-class/ |publisher=Rapido Trains Inc. |access-date=2025-04-11}}</ref>

Use of NPCUs allows for push-pull service on ''Gold Runner'' trains which do not utilize California or Surfliner bi-level equipment. Previously, the three Caltrans units were used in rotation across two Comet trainsets, but in June of 2024, two were moved to Southern California with seven Comet cars, for service on the ''Pacific Surfliner''.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Gillman |first1=Alex |title=Former NJ Transit coaches boost Pacific Surfliner |url=https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/former-nj-transit-coaches-boost-pacific-surfliner/ |work=Trains Magazine |access-date=2025-04-11 |date=2025-02-27}}</ref> As of 2025, Caltrans leases an additional fourth NPCU from Amtrak,<ref>{{cite web |title=Equipment Appendices, Amtrak's FY 2022-2027 Service and Asset Line Plans |url=https://www.amtrak.com/content/dam/projects/dotcom/english/public/documents/corporate/businessplanning/Amtrak-Equipment-ALP-Appendices-FY22-27.pdf |publisher=Amtrak |access-date=2025-04-11 |page=4 |date=2022}}</ref> to allow two units to remain in service on the ''San Joaquins'' trains which use Siemens Venture equipment.
{{clear}}

===Future Stadler Zero Emission Multiple-Units===
In September 2022, [[California State Transportation Agency|CalSTA]] ordered four zero-emission [[Multiple unit|multiple-unit]] (ZEMU) [[hydrail|hydrogen-powered]] trainsets from [[Stadler Rail]], with delivery expected in early 2027.<ref name="SJJPA Business Plan" /> The trainsets will be used for the Merced–Sacramento portion of the ''Gold Runner'' after the first segment of California High-Speed Rail begins service. The order includes an option for 25 additional trainsets for Amtrak California services.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/stadler-unveils-first-hydrogen-train-for-u-s-announces-order-for-up-to-29-more/ |title=Stadler unveils first hydrogen train for U.S., announces order for up to 29 more |date=September 21, 2022 |first=Keith |last=Fender |newspaper=Trains News Wire |access-date=September 22, 2022}}</ref>

== References ==
{{reflist}}
* {{CA-Rail Passenger Development Plan-1988|ref={{harvid|California|1988}} }}
* {{cite book | title=Southern Pacific Railroad | first=Brian | last=Solomon | year=1999 | location=Osceola, WI | publisher=MBI Publishing Company | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dUluUkIywHkC | isbn=0-7603-0614-1 }}{{Dead link|date=April 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}

== Notes ==
{{notelist}}

==External links==
{{commons category|San Joaquin (train)}}
{{Attached KML |display=title,inline}}
*[https://goldrunner.com/ Gold Runner website]
*[https://www.sjjpa.com/ San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority website]

{{Amtrak routes}}
{{Valley Transit}}

[[Category:Public transportation in the San Joaquin Valley Area| ]]
[[Category:Public transportation in Kings County, California]]
[[Category:Public transportation in Fresno County, California]]
[[Category:Public transportation in Madera County, California]]
[[Category:Public transportation in Merced County, California]]
[[Category:Public transportation in Stanislaus County, California]]
[[Category:Public transportation in San Joaquin County, California]]
[[Category:Public transportation in Sacramento County, California]]
[[Category:Public transportation in Contra Costa County, California]]
[[Category:Public transportation in Alameda County, California]]
[[Category:Public transportation in Los Angeles County, California]]
[[Category:Public transportation in Southern California]]
[[Category:San Joaquin Valley]]
[[Category:Amtrak routes]]
[[Category:Passenger rail transportation in California]]
[[Category:Transportation in Kern County, California]]
[[Category:1974 establishments in California]]