View source for Hugh Gaitskell

{{Short description|British politician (1906&ndash;1963)}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2014}}
{{Use British English|date=February 2014}}
{{Infobox officeholder
| honorific-prefix    = [[The Right Honourable]]
| honorific-suffix    = {{post-nominals|country=GBR|size=100%|CBE}}
| image               = Hugh Gaitskell MP.PNG
| caption             = Gaitskell in 1947
| office              = [[Leader of the Opposition (United Kingdom)|Leader of the Opposition]]
| term_start          = 14 December 1955
| term_end            = 18 January 1963
| monarch             = [[Elizabeth II]]
| primeminister       = {{ubl|[[Anthony Eden]] | [[Harold Macmillan]]}}
| predecessor         = [[Herbert Morrison]]
| successor           = [[George Brown (British Labour politician)|George Brown]]
| office1             = [[Leader of the Labour Party (UK)|Leader of the Labour Party]]
| term_start1         = 14 December 1955
| term_end1           = 18 January 1963
| deputy1             = {{ubl|[[Jim Griffiths]]|[[Aneurin Bevan]]|George Brown}}
| predecessor1        = [[Clement Attlee]]
| successor1          = [[Harold Wilson]]
| office2             = [[Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer]]
| term_start2         = 26 October 1951
| term_end2           = 14 December 1955
| leader2             = Clement Attlee
| predecessor2        = [[Rab Butler]]
| successor2          = Harold Wilson
| office3             = [[Chancellor of the Exchequer]]
| term_start3         = 19 October 1950
| term_end3           = 26 October 1951
| primeminister3      = Clement Attlee
| predecessor3        = [[Stafford Cripps]]
| successor3          = Rab Butler
| office4             = [[Secretary of State for Economic Affairs|Minister for Economic Affairs]]
| term_start4         = 28 February 1950
| term_end4           = 19 October 1950
| primeminister4      = Clement Attlee
| predecessor4        = Stafford Cripps
| successor4          = [[Arthur Salter, 1st Baron Salter|Arthur Salter]]
| office5             = [[Minister of Fuel and Power]]
| term_start5         = 7 October 1947
| term_end5           = 28 February 1950
| primeminister5      = Clement Attlee
| predecessor5        = [[Manny Shinwell]]
| successor5          = [[Philip Noel-Baker]]
| office6             = [[Ministry of Power (United Kingdom)| Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Fuel and Power]]
| term_start6         = 10 May 1946
| term_end6           = 7 October 1947
| primeminister6      = Clement Attlee
| predecessor6        = [[William Foster (British politician)| William Foster]]
| successor6          = [[Alfred Robens]]
| parliament7         = United Kingdom
| constituency_MP7    = [[Leeds South (UK Parliament constituency)|Leeds South]]
| term_start7         = 5 July 1945
| term_end7           = 18 January 1963
| predecessor7        = [[Henry Charleton]]
| successor7          = [[Merlyn Rees]]
| birth_name          = Hugh Todd Naylor Gaitskell
| birth_date          = {{birth date|1906|4|9|df=y}}
| birth_place         = London, England
| death_date          = {{death date and age|1963|1|18|1906|4|9|df=y}}
| death_place         = London, England
| resting_place       = [[St John-at-Hampstead]], London
| spouse              = {{Marriage|[[Anna Dora Creditor]]|1937}}
| nationality         = British
| party               = [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour Party]]
| alma_mater          = [[New College, Oxford]]
| children            = 2
}}

'''Hugh Todd Naylor Gaitskell''' {{post-nominals|country=GBR|size=100%|CBE}} (9 April 1906 – 18 January 1963) was a British politician who was [[Leader of the Labour Party (UK)|Leader of the Labour Party]] and [[Leader of the Opposition (United Kingdom)|Leader of the Opposition]] from 1955 until his death in 1963. An economics lecturer and wartime [[Civil Service (United Kingdom)|civil servant]], he was elected to Parliament in [[1945 United Kingdom general election|1945]] and held office in [[Clement Attlee]]'s governments, notably as [[Minister of Fuel and Power]] following the [[Winter of 1946–47 in the United Kingdom|bitter winter of 1946–47]], and eventually joining the [[Cabinet of the United Kingdom|Cabinet]] as [[Chancellor of the Exchequer]]. Facing the need to increase military spending in 1951, he imposed [[National Health Service]] charges on dentures and spectacles, prompting the leading [[left-wing politics|left-winger]] [[Aneurin Bevan]] to resign from the Cabinet.

The perceived similarity in his outlook to that of his [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative Party]] counterpart [[Rab Butler]] was dubbed "Butskellism", initially a satirical term blending their names, and was one aspect of the [[post-war consensus]] through which the major parties largely agreed on the main points of domestic and foreign policy until the 1970s.<ref name="Richard Heffernan 2000 p 301">Brian Brivati and Richard Heffernan, eds. ''The Labour Party: a centenary history'' (Macmillan, 2000) p 301.</ref><ref>Neil Rollings, "'Poor Mr Butskell: A Short Life, Wrecked by Schizophrenia'?." ''Twentieth Century British History'' 5#2 (1994): 183-205.</ref> With Labour in opposition from [[1951 United Kingdom general election|1951]], Gaitskell won bitter leadership battles with Bevan and his supporters to become the Leader of the Labour Party and Leader of the Opposition in [[1955 Labour Party leadership election|1955]]. In 1956 he opposed the Eden government's use of military force at [[Suez Crisis|Suez]]. Against a backdrop of a booming economy he led Labour to its third successive defeat at the [[1959 United Kingdom general election|1959 general election]].

In the late 1950s, in the teeth of opposition from the major [[trade union]]s, he attempted in vain to remove [[Clause IV]] of the Labour Party Constitution, which committed Labour to [[nationalisation]] of all the means of production. He did not reject public ownership altogether, but also emphasised the ethical goals of liberty, social welfare and above all equality, and argued that they could be achieved by fiscal and social policies within a [[mixed economy]]. His revisionist views, on the right wing of the Labour Party, were sometimes called [[Gaitskellism]].

Despite this setback, Gaitskell reversed an attempt to adopt [[unilateral nuclear disarmament]] as Labour Party policy, and opposed Prime Minister [[Harold Macmillan]]'s attempt to lead the UK into the [[European Common Market]]. He died suddenly in 1963, when he appeared to be on the verge of leading Labour back into power and becoming the next prime minister.

== Early life ==
Hugh Gaitskell was born in [[Kensington]], London, the third and youngest child of Arthur Gaitskell (1869–1915), of the [[Indian Civil Service]], and Adelaide Mary, ''née'' Jamieson (died 1956), whose father, [[George Jamieson (diplomat)|George Jamieson]], was [[consul-general]] in Shanghai and prior to that had been Judge of the [[British Supreme Court for China and Japan]].<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.287">Matthew 2004, p.287</ref> He was known as "Sam" as a child.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.287" /> The Gaitskells had a long family connection with the Indian Army, and he spent his childhood in [[Burma]]. After his father's death, his mother soon remarried and returned to Burma, leaving him at boarding school.<ref>Campbell 2010, p197</ref>

Gaitskell was educated at the [[Dragon School]] from 1912 to 1919, where he was a friend of the future poet [[John Betjeman]].<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.290">Matthew 2004, p.290</ref> He then attended [[Winchester College]] from 1919 to 1924.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.287" />

He attended [[New College, Oxford]], from 1924 to 1927. Studying under [[G. D. H. Cole]], Gaitskell became a [[socialist]] and wrote a long essay on [[Chartism]], arguing that the working class needed middle class leadership. Gaitskell's first political involvement came about as a result of the [[General Strike of 1926]].<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.287" /> Most students supported the government and many volunteered for civil defence duties, or helped to run essential services. Gaitskell, unusually, supported the strikers and acted as a driver for people like his Oxford contemporary [[Evan Durbin]] and Cole's wife [[Margaret Cole|Margaret]], who made speeches and delivered the trade union newspaper ''[[British Worker]]''. After the collapse of the General Strike, Gaitskell spent another six months raising funds for the miners, whose dispute (technically a [[Lockout (industry)|lockout]] rather than a strike) did not end until November.<ref>Williams 1985, p18-19</ref> He graduated with a [[first-class degree]] in [[Philosophy, politics and economics]] in 1927.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.287" />

== Academic and early political career ==
In 1927–28 Gaitskell lectured in economics for the [[Workers' Educational Association]] to miners in [[Nottinghamshire]]. His essay on Chartism was published as a WEA booklet in 1928.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.287" /> This was his first experience of interaction with the working class.<ref name="Campbell 2010, p198">Campbell 2010, p198</ref> Gaitskell eventually came to oppose both Cole's [[Guild socialism]] and [[Syndicalism]] and to feel that the General Strike had been the last failed spasm of a strategy – attempting to seize power through direct trade union action – which had already been tried in the abortive [[Black Friday (1921)|Triple Alliance Strike of 1921]]. It is unclear whether Gaitskell was ever sympathetic to [[Oswald Mosley]], then seen as a future leader of the Labour Party. Gaitskell's wife later insisted that he never had been, but Margaret Cole, Evan Durbin's wife and [[Noel Frederick Hall|Noel Hall]] believed that he was, although as an opponent of factional splits he was not tempted to join Mosley's [[New Party (UK)|New Party]] in 1931.<ref>Williams 1985, p43</ref>

Gaitskell helped to run the New [[Fabian Society|Fabian]] Research Bureau, set up by G. D. H. Cole in March 1931.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.287" /> He was selected as [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour]] candidate for [[Chatham (UK Parliament constituency)|Chatham]] in autumn 1932.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.287" /> Gaitskell moved to [[University College London]] in the early 1930s at the invitation of Noel Hall.<ref name="Saville_1980">{{cite journal | author = [[John Saville]] | publisher = [[Socialist Register]] | journal = The Socialist Register 1980 | title = Hugh Gaitskell (1906–1963): An assessment | date = 18 March 1980 | volume = 17 | issue = 17 | pages = 155–158 | url = http://socialistregister.com/index.php/srv/article/view/5450/2349 | access-date = 8 October 2010}}</ref> In 1934 he joined the XYZ Club, a club for Labour financial experts (e.g. [[Hugh Dalton]], of whom he became a protégé, [[Douglas Jay]] and [[Evan Durbin]]) and City people such as the economist Nicholas Davenport.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.287" /> Dalton and Gaitskell were often referred to as "Big Hugh and Little Hugh" over the next fifteen years.<ref>Williams 1985, p70</ref>

In 1934 Gaitskell was in [[Vienna]] on a Rockefeller scholarship.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.287" /> He was attached to the [[University of Vienna]] for the 1933–34 academic year and witnessed first-hand the political suppression of the [[Social Democratic Party of Austria|social democratic]] workers movement by the [[Fatherland Front (Austria)|conservative]] [[Engelbert Dollfuss]]'s government in February 1934.<ref name="Saville_1980" /> This event made a lasting impression, making him profoundly hostile to conservatism but also making him reject as futile the Marxian outlook of many European social democrats. This placed him in the socialist [[Revisionism (Marxism)|revisionist]] camp.

At the [[1935 United Kingdom general election|1935 general election]], he stood unsuccessfully as the Labour Party candidate for [[Chatham (UK Parliament constituency)|Chatham]]. Gaitskell helped to draft "Labour's Immediate Programme" in 1937. This had a strong emphasis on planning, although not as much as his mentor Dalton would have liked, with no plans for the nationalisation of banks or the steel industry. He also drafted documents which would have been used in the election due in 1939–40.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.287" /> Dalton helped him to be selected as candidate for South Leeds in 1937, and had it not been for the war, he would very likely have become an MP by 1940.<ref name="Campbell 2010, p198" />

Gaitskell became head of the Department of Political Economy at UCL when Hall was appointed Director of the [[National Institute of Economic and Social Research]] in 1938,<ref>Brian  Brivati, "Gaitskell, Hugh Todd Naylor (1906–1963)", ''Oxford Dictionary of National Biography''</ref> jointly with [[Paul Rosenstein-Rodan]].<ref name="Dell 1997, p.567">Dell 1997, p.567</ref> He also became a University Reader.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.287" /> He opposed the [[appeasement]] of [[Nazi Germany]]<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.287" /> and supported rearmament.<ref name="Campbell 2010, p198" />

==Personal life==
According to [[Michael Bloch]], Gaitskell enjoyed a number of same-sex relationships while at Oxford, including with [[John Betjeman]], and in the 1930s in Vienna, with [[John Gunther]].<ref>{{Cite book | last = Bloch | first = Michael | title = Closet Queens | page=229 | publisher = Little, Brown | year = 2015 | isbn = 978-1408704127}}</ref>

Whilst a WEA lecturer in the late 1920s Gaitskell lived for a time with a local woman in Nottinghamshire. This is thought to have been his first adult relationship.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.287" /> Until the early 1930s he rejected marriage as a "bourgeois convention".<ref>Williams 1985, p24</ref>

By the mid-1930s Gaitskell had formed a close relationship with a married woman, [[Dora Gaitskell, Baroness Gaitskell| Dora Frost]] (née Creditor), who came out to join him in Vienna for the latter part of his stay there. Adultery still carried such stigma that she thought it best not to help him during his Parliamentary campaign in Chatham in 1935. After her divorce, hard to obtain prior to the passage of the [[Matrimonial Causes Act 1937]], they were eventually married on 9 April 1937, Gaitskell's thirty-first birthday, with Evan Durbin as best man.<ref>Williams 1985, p79</ref> Dora had a son, Raymond Frost (b 1925), from her first marriage.<ref>Williams 1985, p37</ref> The Gaitskells had two daughters: Julia, born in 1939, and Cressida, born in 1942. Dora Gaitskell became a Labour [[life peer]] a year after her husband's death and died in 1989.<ref name="ODNB">[http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/39851 William Rodgers: ''Gaitskell, (Anna) Dora, Baroness Gaitskell (1901–1989)'' rev. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004, accessed 17 March 2013]</ref>

Gaitskell had a long-term affair in the 1950s with the socialite [[Ann Fleming]], the wife of the writer [[Ian Fleming]].<ref name="Campbell 2006">{{cite news |last1=Campbell |first1=John |author-link1=John Campbell (biographer) |title=A House of ill repute |url=https://www.ft.com/content/a841b076-1232-11db-aecf-0000779e2340 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221210/https://www.ft.com/content/a841b076-1232-11db-aecf-0000779e2340 |archive-date=10 December 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |access-date=15 May 2019 |work=[[Financial Times]] |date=14 July 2006}}</ref> She wrote to [[Evelyn Waugh]] about a dinner party in 1958 in which Gaitskell and friends from Oxford days "held hands and recited verse because in early life they had loved each other in the same set", until the arrival of her husband "silenced the eminent homos", who "did not seem too pleased."<ref>{{Cite book | last = Bloch | first = Michael | title = Closet Queens | page=230 | publisher = Little, Brown | year = 2015 | isbn = 978-1408704127}}</ref> [[Woodrow Wyatt]] wrote that "there was a scintilla of platonic homosexuality in [Gaitskell's] affection for Tony [[Anthony Crosland|[Crosland]]]".<ref>{{Cite book | last = Woodrow | first = Wyatt | title = Confessions of an Optimist | page=179 | publisher = Collins | year = 1985}}</ref>

In private he was humorous and fun-loving, with a love of ballroom dancing. This contrasted with his stern public image. He was a member of the Steering Committee of the [[Bilderberg Group]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/former-steering-committee-members.html |title=Former Steering Committee Members |work=bilderbergmeetings.org |publisher=[[Bilderberg Group]] |access-date=8 February 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140202095633/http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/former-steering-committee-members.html |archive-date=2 February 2014 |df=dmy-all }}</ref>

== Wartime civil servant and election to Parliament ==
During the [[Second World War]], from the formation of Churchill's coalition government in May 1940 Gaitskell worked with Noel Hall and [[Hugh Dalton]] as a senior civil servant for the [[Ministry of Economic Warfare]], giving him experience of government.<ref name="Saville_1980" /> As Dalton's Private Secretary Gaitskell was more of a ''[[Chef de Cabinet]]'' and trusted adviser. Observers watched Gaitskell blossom and enjoy exercising power. Dalton liked to shout at his subordinates; Gaitskell sometimes shouted back.<ref>Williams 1985, pp98-9</ref> Along with Dalton, Gaitskell was moved to the [[Board of Trade]] in February 1942, where for the first time he came into contact with the leaders of the miners' unions, who were later to support him in his struggles against [[Aneurin Bevan]] in the 1950s.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.288">Matthew 2004, p.288</ref> For his service, he was appointed [[Order of the British Empire|Commander of the Order of the British Empire]] in 1945.

In March 1945 Gaitskell suffered a [[coronary thrombosis]] brought on by overwork. Advised to rest, he considered withdrawing from his parliamentary candidacy in [[Leeds]], but he was popular with his constituency workers and they offered to campaign for him even if he was unable to do so.<ref>Williams 1985, p124-5</ref> He was also approached to return to UCL as a Professor after the war, but he disliked the constant state of flux of academic economics and the increasing emphasis on mathematics, a subject of which he had little knowledge. By now he found himself more drawn to public life.<ref>Williams 1985, p81</ref>

Gaitskell was elected Labour [[Member of Parliament (United Kingdom)|Member of Parliament]] (MP) for [[Leeds South (UK Parliament constituency)|Leeds South]] in the Labour landslide victory of [[1945 United Kingdom general election|1945]].<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.288" /> Despite his illness, as a protégé of Dalton he was seriously considered for immediate appointment as a junior minister, Parliamentary Under-Secretary at the [[Board of Trade]] (under [[Stafford Cripps]]).<ref>Williams 1985, p130</ref> This would have been a rare honour since 263 of the 393 Labour MPs in 1945 were newly elected, but it did not take place.<ref>Dell 1997, p.15 Harold Wilson, another newly elected economics don and wartime civil servant, was appointed a junior minister immediately</ref>

As a backbencher he spoke in debates in support of Dalton's [[Bank of England Act 1946|nationalisation]] of the [[Bank of England]], which eventually received Royal Assent on 14 February 1946. Dalton was trying to score party points by claiming that he was reasserting political control over the [[City of London]], a far-fetched claim as the Bank was already under political control. Although some Conservative MPs spoke against the measure it was not opposed by Churchill, then Leader of the Opposition, who had had an ambivalent view of the Bank since his own time as chancellor in the 1920s.<ref>Dell 1997, p.77</ref>

== Ministry of Fuel and Power ==
Gaitskell was given his first ministerial appointment in May 1946 as Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Fuel and Power, serving under [[Manny Shinwell|Emmanuel "Manny" Shinwell]]. The job had initially been earmarked for [[Harold Wilson]], with Gaitskell pencilled in to succeed Wilson as Parliamentary Under-Secretary at the [[Ministry of Works (United Kingdom)|Ministry of Works]]. Gaitskell believed that Shinwell, who was suspicious of middle class intellectual socialists, may have picked him in preference to Wilson because the latter was already an expert on the mining industry.<ref>Williams 1985, p132</ref>

Gaitskell played an important role steering the [[Coal Industry Nationalisation Act 1946|Coal Nationalisation Bill]] through the House of Commons, bearing the brunt of the committee stage and winding up the final debate. In the [[Winter of 1946–47 in the United Kingdom|fuel crisis of February 1947]] Shinwell, who had ignored Gaitskell's warnings, had to ask the Cabinet for permission to shut down power stations; Gaitskell was put on and ran the key committee which decided where coal should be sent. In 1947 he once again played an important role steering [[Electricity Act 1947|electricity nationalisation]] through the House of Commons, winding up the debate on the [[second reading]].<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.288" />

On 7 October 1947 Gaitskell was promoted to [[Minister of Fuel and Power]] in Shinwell's place. He was not made a member of the Cabinet,<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.288" /> although he often attended Cabinet meetings when his input was required.<ref>Dell 1997, p.135</ref> He had committed a gaffe during the municipal election campaign in Hastings earlier that year, when he recommended that people save fuel by taking fewer baths, adding that he had never taken all that many himself; in the House of Commons in late October Churchill joked that it was no wonder that the Government were "in bad odour" and asked the Speaker if he might be permitted to describe Labour ministers as "lousey", normally an unparliamentary expression, as it would be a simple statement of fact.<ref>Williams 1985, p151</ref> Gaitskell made himself very unpopular by abolishing the basic petrol ration for private motorists, but encouraged the building of oil refineries, a move little-noticed at the time which would have important repercussions for the future.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.288" />

== Treasury matters ==

=== Devaluation ===
In early July 1949 Gaitskell shared [[Chancellor of the Exchequer]] [[Stafford Cripps]]' worries that Treasury officials were too "liberal" and too reluctant to implement socialist measures.<ref name="Dell 1997, p. 119-21">Dell 1997, p. 119-21</ref> Like Cripps and Dalton, Gaitskell was a devotee of cheap money. Not only were higher interest rates seen as associated with the [[Gold standard]] and the deflationary policies of the 1920s, but the policy preference in the 1940s was for quantitative controls (e.g. [[exchange controls]] in finance, or rationing of physical goods) rather than the price mechanism. Interest rates, which had been cut to low levels in the 1930s, did not begin to be used as an instrument of policy again until after the Conservatives returned to power in 1952.<ref>Dell 1997, p. 111</ref>

Cripps was seriously unwell and had to go to [[Switzerland]] to convalesce on 18 July; Attlee announced that he was taking over Cripps' responsibilities with three young, financially able, ministers to advise him.<ref name="Dell 1997, p. 119-21" /> Gaitskell soon emerged as the leader of the group, the others being [[Harold Wilson]], [[President of the Board of Trade]], and Douglas Jay, [[Economic Secretary to the Treasury]]. All three had been wartime civil servants.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.288" />

The young ministers were now in favour of devaluation of the [[Pound sterling]], currently at $4.03. Jay lunched with Gaitskell on 20 July 1949, and they agreed that this would help to reverse the drain of capital out of the UK, that the US was unlikely to help with further [[Anglo-American loan|loans]] or [[Marshall Plan|gifts]] of dollars, that Commonwealth countries needed to be encouraged to buy British goods rather than goods priced in dollars, that there was potential to increase exports to dollar areas, and that if nothing was done there was a risk of reserves running low and a collapse in sterling putting the UK at the mercy of the US. On 21 July Gaitskell, Jay and Wilson met the Prime Minister to tell him that devaluation was inevitable as reserves were still dropping. On 29 July, the Cabinet agreed in principle to devalue, having also been given the same advice in another memo from senior civil servants, [[Edward Bridges, 1st Baron Bridges|Sir Edward Bridges]] ([[Permanent Secretary to the Treasury]]) and the two Treasury Second Secretaries ([[Robert Hall, Baron Roberthall|Robert Hall]] and [[Edwin Plowden, Baron Plowden|Sir Edwin Plowden]]).<ref name="Dell 1997, p. 119-21" />

Cripps returned to London on 18 August to be greeted by two memoranda from Gaitskell. One was a short paper advising a general election that autumn after devaluation. Cripps did indeed make that recommendation to Attlee, but it was rejected. The second paper was ten pages on devaluation, which in [[Edmund Dell]]'s view it is unlikely he actually read. Gaitskell argued that with employment high, the balance of payments in decent shape and inflation a containable problem, the ''only'' problem was shortage of dollars, with US opinion very reluctant to help the UK any more. He recommended spending cuts to keep inflation under control – but did not say how much. He also recommended that sterling initially float within a band of $2.80–$2.60, a proposal discussed with Hall and Plowden. He recommended devaluation by 4 September, but rejected the idea that currencies become fully convertible – in the way that [[John Maynard Keynes]] had advocated at the [[Bretton Woods Conference]] – as this might prevent governments protecting full employment. Dell argues that Gaitskell's memo was full of the impatience of a young man at his elders clinging to office, but that on the other hand he himself had been slow to recognise the need for devaluation.<ref>Dell 1997, p. 122-4</ref> Gaitskell and Wilson met with Attlee, [[Ernest Bevin]] and Cripps at [[Chequers]] on 19 August, and Bevin and Cripps agreed with some reluctance to devaluation. The decision was finally confirmed by the Cabinet on 9 August, although Cripps rejected Gaitskell's plan for a floating band.<ref>Dell 1997, p. 124-5</ref> Devaluation (from $4.03 to $2.80) was announced on Sunday 18 September after a secret Cabinet meeting the day before. Many other countries followed suit, so it was mainly UK trade with dollar-using countries which was affected.<ref>Dell 1997, p.126</ref>

Gaitskell had initially been suspicious of devaluation because it was a price mechanism, but earned the admiration of Robert Hall over this crisis.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.138">Dell 1997, p.138</ref> He accepted the need for spending cuts to help make devaluation work and keep to keep the Americans happy, and thought former chancellor Dalton "rather dishonest" for arguing at the Economic Policy Committee that cuts were not necessary. Cripps, who had implied in his devaluation broadcast that devaluation was an ''alternative'' to cuts, threatened to resign unless cuts of £300m were agreed; [[Aneurin Bevan]] (Minister of Health) in turn threatened to resign as did [[A.V. Alexander]] ([[Secretary of State for Defence|Minister of Defence]]). In the event most of the cuts were to future spending plans except for Bevan's housing budget.<ref>Dell 1997, p. 127-8</ref>

=== Minister for Economic Affairs ===
In January 1950 Gaitskell submitted a paper called "Control and Liberalisation" to the Economic Policy Committee, which he was sometimes invited to attend. He wrote that "On 'liberalisation' we have gone about far enough. But we have done it for political reasons – US and Europe". He was opposed to the convertibility of currencies and non-discrimination between trading partners, both policies which the US favoured. Britain still preferred to encourage trade in pounds sterling within the Commonwealth, and Gaitskell wanted to preserve Britain's ability to avoid downturns like the US downturn of 1948–9, which Britain had largely escaped because of devaluation.<ref>Dell 1997, p.140</ref>

In the [[1950 United Kingdom general election|February 1950 General Election]] the Government were re-elected with a tiny majority. In the ensuing reshuffle Gaitskell was appointed [[Secretary of State for Economic Affairs|Minister for Economic Affairs]], effectively Deputy Chancellor but still outside the Cabinet.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.288" /> He was made a full member of the Economic Policy Committee.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.136">Dell 1997, p.136</ref> Soon after his promotion he recorded that he often had to stiffen up Cripps, who was not as tough as his public image would suggest, to make sure he did not make too many concessions in negotiations with colleagues.<ref>Dell 1997, p.101</ref>

The level of spending on the new [[NHS]] was already running far in excess of predictions.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.143">Dell 1997, p.143</ref> In November 1949, with the high level of public spending already a problem and under pressure from Cripps, Bevan had pushed an act through Parliament granting the government the power to impose prescription charges, although they were not brought in just yet (Cripps had wanted 1 shilling per prescription, but Bevan had not agreed to this). In the 1949–50 financial year Cripps had allowed £90m of extra health service spending ("supplementaries"). Early in 1950 Cripps backed off from a plan to introduce further charges, this time on false teeth and spectacles, after Bevan threatened to resign, but Gaitskell was put on a committee to monitor Bevan's agreement to a ceiling on NHS spending. The Treasury wanted health spending capped at £350m per annum, although it was willing to accept £392m for 1950–1.<ref>Dell 1997, p.133, 147</ref>

There was already friction between Gaitskell and Bevan. At one meeting, probably 28 June 1950, Bevan had been about to walk out of the room until Attlee called him back. Bevan stopped attending Cripps' Thursday night dinners for economics ministers.<ref>Dell 1997, p.137</ref> After one of those dinners Bevan's old ally [[John Strachey (politician)|John Strachey]], now Minister of Food, rebuked him for attacking Gaitskell, whom he thought "one of the really considerable men of the Government", a suggestion to which Bevan responded with derision, calling him "nothing, nothing, nothing".<ref name="Campbell 2010, p204">Campbell 2010, p204</ref>

=== Rearmament and European Payments Union ===
By the second half of 1950 the western powers were caught up in a major rearmament drive. The outbreak of the [[Korean War]] in June 1950 at first threatened US loss of South Korea (which was seen as vital for the defence of Japan), and by the autumn threatened to escalate into a general war between the US and Communist China. There were also very real worries that the Soviets might invade western Europe (which was unarmed, with strong communist influence in many countries) and that the US would not help Britain if she did not help herself. The crushing of democracy in Czechoslovakia had been as recent as 1948. In August 1950 the British defence budget was hiked from £2.3bn to £3.6bn (a total over a three-year period); at this stage it had appeared that the US would be willing to help foot the bill.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.143-4">Dell 1997, p.143-4</ref>

In September 1950 inflationary pressure was worsened when the [[Trades Union Congress|TUC]] voted to end the existing two-year wage freeze, although there was no wage explosion just yet. It was difficult for the Treasury to take tough measures given the government's small majority and the likelihood of another election soon.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.143" />

Gaitskell thought balance of payments problems should be solved not by realignments of currencies but by asking surplus countries like the US and [[Belgium]] to inflate their economies (so they would import more). He was attacked for this by the US Secretary of the Treasury [[John Wesley Snyder]] and [[Camille Gutt]] (former Belgian finance minister and now managing director of the [[IMF]]). Dell argues that Gaitskell did not realise that other countries had their own domestic problems.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.141">Dell 1997, p.141</ref> In September 1950, with Britain's balance of payments now in surplus, Gaitskell negotiated British membership of the [[European Payments Union]], meaning that instead of bilateral clearing, European currencies were to be convertible against one another even if not against the US dollar. Previously dollars had been needed for trade within Europe. Until then Gaitskell had shared concerns that some countries might stay in permanent deficit and thus effectively use their neighbours for free borrowing, or conversely that Belgium's surplus would enable her to suck gold and dollars from Britain. The EPU lasted until sterling was made convertible in 1958.<ref>Dell 1997, p.132, p.142</ref><ref>The USA had been pushing for such a measure as a precursor to European federalism. Cripps thought it would be a threat to the [[sterling area]] and claimed in February 1950 that it would prevent Britain from preserving full employment by restricting imports (the latter charge might have been true of a customs union but was untrue of a payments union). Cobbold (Governor of the Bank of England) was suspicious of EPU, and saw it as a return to the Gold Standard of the 1920s or of the pre-1914 era.[Dell 1997, p.132, 142]</ref>

Although Gaitskell had until recently thought Bevan an inevitable future leader for the Labour Party, by the 1950 Party Conference (2 October)  ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'''s  political correspondent guessed correctly that he and Gaitskell were already fighting a proxy battle for the future leadership.<ref name="Campbell 2010, p204" />

=== Promotion to the Chancellorship ===
Cripps, whose health was still failing, had notified Attlee of his intention to resign as [[Chancellor of the Exchequer]] on 26 April 1950. He attempted to resign in the summer but was dissuaded by Gaitskell and Plowden because of the outbreak of the Korean War. He instead went on a long holiday, leaving Gaitskell in charge.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.133">Dell 1997, p.133</ref>

It was now becoming clear that the US Congress was reluctant to help Britain meet the cost of rearmament. Gaitskell visited Washington in October 1950, his first visit there, just before becoming Chancellor. He warned that the [[terms of trade]] were shifting against Britain, and of the costs of rearmament.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.144">Dell 1997, p.144</ref>

In October 1950 Cripps finally resigned as Chancellor of the Exchequer. Dalton proposed Gaitskell for the vacancy. Sir Edward Bridges wanted [[Herbert Morrison]], a political heavyweight; Morrison had been an early advocate of devaluation but did not regard himself as qualified.<ref>Dell 1997, p.135-7</ref> Gaitskell was appointed at the young age of 44, especially unusual as most of Attlee's Cabinet were in their sixties or older. He became the Chancellor with the shortest Parliamentary apprenticeship since [[Pitt the Younger]] in 1782.<ref>Campbell 2010, p199</ref> As Chancellor of the Exchequer he retained the same control over economic planning which Cripps had had. Both Cripps and Gaitskell insisted that Gaitskell be listed after Attlee, Bevin and Morrison in the official Cabinet pecking order.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.136" />

Bevan was furious at Gaitskell being promoted over him, even though, as Gaitskell correctly guessed in his diary, he probably did not want the job himself.<ref>Campbell 2010, pp.204-5</ref> Gaitskell recorded that Bevan often asserted that Cripps had promised him the Exchequer.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.567" />

The US Chiefs of Staff wanted an even greater increase in the British armaments budget to £6bn over three years, a plan backed by the British Chiefs of Staff and urged on Prime Minister Attlee on his visit to the US in Dec 1950. On his return from Washington Attlee told the House of Commons on 29 January 1951 that the defence budget was to be hiked to £4.7bn over the next three-year period, including a fourfold increase in munitions production. The defence budget was to increase from 8% to 14% of GNP, a proportion exceeded only by the US amongst NATO members. At the peak 2.5m people, 11% of the workforce, would be engaged in defence work.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.143-4" />

== Chancellor of the Exchequer, 1950–51 ==

=== Economic philosophy ===
On his appointment, Gaitskell told [[William Armstrong, Baron Armstrong of Sanderstead|William Armstrong]], his Principal Private Secretary, that the main job over next few years would be the [[redistribution of wealth]].<ref name="Dell 1997, p.147">Dell 1997, p.147</ref>

[[Rab Butler]] and [[Samuel Brittan]], both writing in the early 1970s, commented that Gaitskell was the most technically qualified chancellor of the 20th century up until that date.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.138" /> However, Dell comments that he often went into excessive detail, including personally overseeing economic forecasts, and held excessively long meetings. This may have been from a love of micro-management or because, as an advocate of controls and planning, he was suspicious of treasury officials, whom he thought excessively inclined to free market mechanisms.<ref>Dell 1997, p.139</ref>

In December 1950, Gaitskell rejected the advice of [[Cameron Cobbold, 1st Baron Cobbold|Kim Cobbold]] ([[Governor of the Bank of England]]) and Hall that interest rates be raised, calling such a policy "completely antiquated".<ref name="Dell 1997, p.141" />

=== Cost of rearmament ===
[[Marshall Aid]], which had totalled $3.1bn over previous three years, ended officially on 1 January 1951, although in practice it had ended six weeks earlier. It was held that the balance of payments was now strong enough for it no longer to be necessary.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.144" /> [[Harold Wilson]] ([[President of the Board of Trade]]) and [[George Strauss]] ([[Minister of Supply]]) warned Gaitskell that the burden of rearmament was too much for the shortage of raw materials and manufacturing capacity, but Gaitskell ignored them as they were friends of Bevan. On 27 January 1951 Bevan was reshuffled to the Ministry of Labour with Health, now under [[Hilary Marquand]], downgraded to a non-Cabinet appointment.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.146">Dell 1997, p.146</ref> Gaitskell welcomed the changes as reducing an obstacle to economies in health spending.<ref>Campbell 2010, p205</ref>

Gaitskell still favoured discrimination in favour of sterling trade and was opposed to sterling convertibility but was now a lot more pro-American since his October 1950 visit to Washington. By February 1951 he was strongly critical of anti-Americanism in cabinet.<ref>Dell 1997, p.145</ref>

Bevan's Commons speech on 15 February 1951 defended the extra £4.7bn on armaments, although most of it was a warning not to rearm too fast and that communism would be defeated through democratic socialism and not through arms. The following day Gaitskell recorded his regret that for all Bevan's brilliance in oratory he should be "a difficult team worker, and some would say even worse – a thoroughly unreliable and disloyal colleague."<ref>Campbell 2010, p206</ref>

=== Budget ===
Gaitskell made the controversial decision to introduce charges for prescription glasses and dentures on the [[National Health Service]] in his spring 1951 budget.<ref name="Howse">{{cite news|title=Anniversaries of 2013|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/9770133/Anniversaries-of-2013.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121231203151/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/9770133/Anniversaries-of-2013.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=31 December 2012|newspaper=Daily Telegraph|date=28 December 2012|location=London|first=Christopher|last=Howse}}</ref> The Cabinet had agreed in principle in February 1951 to charges on teeth and spectacles.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.288" /> For 1951-2 Bevan was demanding £422m of health spending, whereas Gaitskell was willing to allow £400m.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.147" /> Gaitskell wanted to pass on half the cost of false teeth and spectacles, to bring in £13m in 1951-2 and £23m in a full year. Children, the poor and the sick were to be exempt.<ref>Dell 1997, p.148</ref> On 9 March [[Ernest Bevin]] was moved from the Foreign Office, dying a month later. Bevan, who had hoped to succeed him, was passed over for promotion to a major job for the second time in six months. By this point other ministers felt that Bevan was looking for an issue on which to resign, and that it was pointless making too many concessions as he needed to be made to appear to be in the wrong.<ref>Dell 1997, p.146, 148</ref>

In addition, [[Purchase Tax]] was increased from 33% to 66% on certain luxury items such as cars, television sets and domestic appliances, while entertainment tax was increased on cinema tickets.<ref name="Hugh Gaitskell by Brian Brivati">Hugh Gaitskell by Brian Brivati</ref> At the same time, however, taxation on profits was raised and pensions increased to compensate pensioners for a rise in the cost of living,<ref>Henry Pelling, ''The Labour Governments, 1945–51'' (1984).</ref> while the allowances for dependent children payable to widows, the unemployed and the sick, together with marriage and child allowances, were also increased.<ref>Post-Victorian Britain 1902–1951 by Lewis Charles Bernard Seaman</ref> In addition a number of small items were removed from purchase tax,<ref name="Hugh Gaitskell by Brian Brivati" /> and the amount of earnings allowed without affecting the state pension was increased from 20 shillings (£1) to 40 shillings (£2) a week.<ref>Denis Nowell Pritt, ''The Labour Government 1945–51'' (1963)</ref> Besides taxing the better off and protecting pensions, Gaitskell actually increased NHS spending.<ref>Campbell 2010, p209-10</ref> The budget increased defence spending by £500m to £1.5bn for 1951–2, helped by a surplus inherited from Cripps and optimistic growth forecasts. Plans to introduce capital-gains tax were postponed until 1952.<ref>Dell 1997, p.147, 150</ref>

Prime Minister Attlee's initial reaction to the draft budget was that there were not likely to be many votes in it. Gaitskell replied that he could not expect votes in a rearmament year.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.288" /> [[Ernest Bevin]] did not like the idea of health charges and tried in vain to negotiate a compromise. Education Minister [[George Tomlinson (British politician)|George Tomlinson]] suggested a repetition of the previous year's formula, a spending ceiling of £400m. Gaitskell was prepared to offer a delay in the introduction of charges but rejected the Tomlinson formula despite Attlee's urgings, since the ceiling could not be achieved without charges. Attlee went into hospital to be treated for a duodenal ulcer on 21 March. From his sickbed he wrote what [[Kenneth O. Morgan]] calls a "remarkably vacuous letter", which "dealt with none of the substantive points at issue".<ref name="Dell 1997, p.148-9">Dell 1997, p.148-9</ref> At a Cabinet meeting on 22 March Gaitskell was dissuaded from his original intention to insist on prescription charges since they might fall heavily on the genuinely sick.<ref name="Campbell 2010, p207-8">Campbell 2010, p207-8</ref>

=== Bevan's resignation ===
Gaitskell and Attlee warned of risks that the rearmament programme might not be fully implemented. Gaitskell warned the Economic Policy Committee (3 April 1951) of the shortage of machine tools, and stated that some could be imported from the US but that this would weaken the balance of payments.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.151">Dell 1997, p.151</ref>

A very angry Bevan saw the charges as a blow to the principle of a free health service, telling a heckler while he was making a speech in [[Bermondsey]] (3 April 1951) that he would resign rather than accept health charges. Gaitskell, besides the obvious need for a new Chancellor to assert his authority, saw this as a deliberate attempt to bounce the Cabinet publicly, telling Dalton that Bevan's "influence was very much exaggerated" and that he might split the Labour Party as [[Lloyd George]] had the Liberals.<ref name="Campbell 2010, p207-8" />

In two long Cabinet meetings on 9 April Bevan found himself supported only by Harold Wilson.<ref name="Campbell 2010, p208-9">Campbell 2010, p208-9</ref> [[Herbert Morrison]], who was chairing the Cabinet whilst Attlee was being treated in hospital, again proposed a compromise that there be an agreed ceiling on public spending but no NHS charges.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.289">Matthew 2004, p.289</ref> Gaitskell was determined that there would not be an open-ended commitment to welfare spending at the expense of economic investment or rearmament, and rejected Morrison's proposal.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.289" /> At the second meeting, Gaitskell threatened to resign, but quietly and without a public fuss, if he did not have the backing of the Cabinet; the resignation of the Chancellor on the eve of the budget would have caused a political crisis. Douglas Jay and others attempted in vain to persuade Gaitskell to compromise, but he refused, arguing that two members of the Cabinet should not be allowed to dictate to eighteen, although he agreed not to specify just yet the date at which the charges would come into effect.<ref name="Campbell 2010, p208-9" /> A final attempt by Attlee to negotiate a compromise from his sickbed (10 April) came to nothing.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.148-9" /> The affair brought Gaitskell close to physical and emotional collapse.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.289" />

Gaitskell won the admiration of Treasury officials for his stance: on the morning of the budget Sir Edward Bridges came to tell him of the respect he had earned in the department and that it was "the best day we have had in the Treasury for ten years". Gaitskell recorded that Bridges, Plowden, Leslie (Head of Information) and Armstrong were all urging him to stand firm and that he was "overcome with emotion" at Armstrong's words.<ref>Dell 1997, p.149</ref>

Gaitskell's budget was praised at the time. His predecessor Stafford Cripps wrote to him praising him for not giving in to "political expediency", whilst he was supported in public by two younger MPs later to be staunch allies, [[Roy Jenkins]] and [[Anthony Crosland]].<ref>Dell 1997, p.150</ref> After the budget [[Tony Benn]], who was on the right of the Labour Party at that time, recorded the atmosphere at the party meeting (i.e. a meeting of Labour MPs) on 11 April as "sheer relief" that it had not been worse; the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) strongly supported the budget. However, Bevan soon rejected Gaitskell's proposed compromise that it be announced that the health charges were not to be permanent as "a bromide". Bevan's ally [[Michael Foot]] wrote an editorial in ''[[Tribune (magazine)|Tribune]]'' comparing Gaitskell to [[Philip Snowden]] (the Chancellor whose cuts in 1931 had brought down the [[Second Labour Government]], after which he and other leading members of the Cabinet entered into the Tory-dominated [[National Government (United Kingdom)|National Government]]). Bevan resigned on 21 April, as did Harold Wilson and [[John Freeman (British politician)|John Freeman]].<ref>Campbell 2010, p210</ref>

Gaitskell defended his budget at the party meeting on 24 April. He said it was still too early to tell if the rearmament programme was actually achievable.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.151" /> Benn commented after the meeting on how Gaitskell's greatness arose from his combination of "intellectual ability and political forcefulness". Bevan then made an angry speech which did not impress many of the PLP.<ref>Campbell 2010, p212-3</ref>

=== Analysis ===
[[Edmund Dell]] argues that neither Bevan nor Gaitskell emerge with much credit from the affair. "Gaitskell was obsessed by Bevan and by the need to establish his authority over him". Charges on false teeth and spectacles were "insignificant" in the context of the greater budget and "financially were neither here nor there" ... but Bevan was "impatient and arrogant and noisy and apparently intent on exhausting the tolerance of his cabinet colleagues". Gaitskell agreed to limit health charges to three years (subject to Parliament voting to extend them), made concessions on pensions to the Trade Union Group of MPs, and a diary entry suggests he was not happy about dividend constraints – yet he was not prepared to make significant concessions to Bevan. However, Dell argues that all chancellors have to make sticking points or they would have to give in to everybody. Gaitskell saw himself as defending the country and wanted to prove Labour a "responsible party of government", but the public were not yet aware of the looming inflation problem. Gaitskell told [[George Brown, Baron George-Brown|George Brown]] in 1960: "It was a battle between us for power – he knew it and so did I".<ref>Dell 1997, p.148, 155-7</ref>

[[John Campbell (biographer)|John Campbell]] agrees that Bevan may have been partly right that Gaitskell, abetted by Morrison, was deliberately trying to drive him out of the Cabinet. Gaitskell believed that Labour had to be seen to govern with fiscal responsibility, telling Dalton on 4 May 1951 that he and Bevan were engaged in a battle for the soul of the Labour Party, and that if Bevan won Labour would be out for many years (although, ironically, Gaitskell won but they were out of power for many years anyway). Had Attlee not been sick, he might have been able to patch up a compromise.<ref>Campbell 2010, p213-5</ref>

Historian [[Brian Brivati]] believes that the importance of the charges was "irrelevant" to the huge cost of rearmament, which damaged Britain's recovery in the years which followed by absorbing earnings from exports.<ref>Matthew 2004, p.288-9</ref>

=== Aftermath ===
A £300m surplus in the British balance of payments in 1950 turned into a £400m deficit in 1951, the most sudden reversal on record up until that time. This was caused partly by businesses switching to rearmament rather than generating exports. The other reason was a deterioration in the [[terms of trade]]: higher oil prices after the [[Abadan Crisis|Iranian oil crisis]] caused an outflow of dollars, whilst prices of wool, tin and rubber fell so the rest of the sterling area was not earning so many dollars from exports. By the second half of 1951 the overseas sterling area was importing from North America at double the 1950 rate. By 1951 inflation was beginning to increase, the government budget surplus had disappeared, and in another sign of an overheating economy unemployment was down to 1945 levels. By the second half of 1951 Gaitskell was worried about the political effect of the higher cost of living, but the ''[[Financial Times]]'' and ''[[The Economist]]'' accused him of using higher prices to choke off consumption and free up resources for rearmament instead of consumer goods production.<ref>Dell 1997, p.152, 154</ref>

Gaitskell again rejected Treasury advice to raise interest rates to cool the economy in June, July and August 1951. He argued that higher interest rates would be perceived as generating profits for the banks, which would not sit well with trade unions, and he was only prepared to consider demanding that the banks restrict credit.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.141" /> Gaitskell (diary 10 August 1951) stated that he and Morrison thought that Attlee had been too weak in dealing with Bevan.<ref>Campbell 2010, p216</ref> By August–September 1951 the Treasury were taken by surprise by a full-on sterling crisis, which they passed on to the incoming Conservative Government. Sterling was trading unofficially at $2.40, below the official rate of $2.80.<ref>Dell 1997, p.158</ref>

Gaitskell visited Washington in the autumn of 1951, where he thought US Treasury Secretary [[John Wesley Snyder]] "a pretty small-minded, small town, semi-isolationist". A committee was formed, containing Plowden and [[Averell Harriman]], to investigate the way in which US rearmament was absorbing and pushing up the prices of world raw materials.<ref name="Dell 1997, p.151" /> Gaitskell was horrified by Attlee's calling an election (19 September 1951) when he and Morrison were in North America. If Attlee had held on for another six or nine months Labour might have won.<ref>Dell 1997, p.157</ref> Labour lost the [[1951 United Kingdom general election|October 1951 General Election]] despite getting more votes than the Conservatives. Whilst the Bevanites blamed defeat on Morrison's policy of "consolidation", the right blamed Bevan for causing a split. Nobody imagined Labour would be out of power for more than a few years, and Attlee expected to be Prime Minister again by 1953.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.288" /><ref>Campbell 2010, p217</ref>

When the Conservatives returned to power, the new chancellor [[Rab Butler]] would get the balance of payments back into surplus in 1952 by cutting overseas spending, a measure which Dell suggests Gaitskell had not wanted to irritate the Americans by taking. In his memoirs (''Art of the Possible'', p.&nbsp;163) Butler later called him "a political mouse who, confronted with a gigantic deterioration in the balance of payments, responded by cutting a sliver off the cheese ration".<ref>Dell 1997, p.154</ref> After the Conservatives cut the armament plans in 1952 Crosland told people that Gaitskell had made him look like "a complete idiot" for supporting the budget in public. However, even by the end of 1951 there was less likelihood of the Korean War turning into a general war (the front line had stabilised, with the US administration being clear that they did not wish to escalate hostilities against China), so any government might have pared back defence spending in 1952.<ref>Dell 1997, p.150, 152-3</ref>

== Opposition: the Bevanite split 1951–55 ==

=== 1951–52 ===
In opposition, Gaitskell's house at [[Frognal]] Gardens, [[Hampstead]] became a centre for political intrigue. At first Herbert Morrison still seemed likely to succeed Attlee as leader. This period was characterised by factional infighting between the '[[Bevanite]]' left of the Labour party led by [[Aneurin Bevan]], whose strength lay mainly in the constituency Labour Parties ("CLP"s) and the '[[Gaitskellite]]' right who had the upper hand in the Parliamentary Party (Labour MPs – known collectively as the "PLP").<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.289" />

In February 1952 Bevan led a rebellion of 56 other Labour MPs to vote against the Conservatives' defence spending plans (the official Labour position was to abstain). Dalton recorded (11 March) that Gaitskell was, behind the scenes, keen for a showdown with Bevan. At the party meeting Bevan refused to agree to toe the party line, but the issue was defused by a conciliatory motion by the centrist "Keep Calm" group, passed against the wishes of the platform.<ref>Campbell 2010, p218-9</ref> Bevan at this time thought that Gaitskell should be reduced to "a junior clerk" in the next Labour Government. On 1 August 1952, when Gaitskell had succeeded in putting Churchill (Prime Minister at the time) on the ropes in a House of Commons debate, Bevan intervened to attack Gaitskell, an event greeted with Tory relief and according to [[Richard Crossman|Crossman]] "icy silence" on the Labour benches.<ref>Campbell 2010, p219</ref>

Dalton (30 September 1952) thought the [[Morecambe]] Party Conference "the worst ... for bad temper and general hatred, since 1926" whilst [[Michael Foot]] thought it "rowdy, convulsive, vulgar, splenetic". A series of left-wing motions were passed. Bevanites took over the constituency section of Labour's National Executive Committee (the "NEC"): Bevan, [[Barbara Castle]], [[Tom Driberg]], [[Ian Mikardo]] and [[Harold Wilson]] took the top five places with Crossman seventh. Veteran right-wingers such as [[Herbert Morrison]] and [[Hugh Dalton]] were voted off, with [[Jim Griffiths]] in sixth place the only member of the Old Guard to survive; Shinwell, who as Minister of Defence was seen as responsible for the rearmament programme, had been voted off the previous year.<ref name="Campbell 2010, p219-21">Campbell 2010, p219-21</ref>

In a speech at [[Stalybridge]] (5 October 1952) Gaitskell alleged that "about one-sixth" of the constituency delegates "appeared to be Communist or Communist-inspired" and attacked "the stream of grossly misleading propaganda with poisonous innuendos and malicious attacks on Attlee, Morrison and the rest of us" published in ''Tribune''. He claimed that Labour was threatened by "mob rule" got up by "frustrated journalists" (a number of Bevanites, including [[Michael Foot]] and [[Tom Driberg]], were journalists).<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.289" /><ref name="Campbell 2010, p219-21" /> He received strong backing from the [[TGWU]] whose block vote was of immense importance at the Labour Conference and which was able to exert pressure on its sponsored MPs to toe the party line.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.289" />

Attlee then gave a speech at the newly built [[Royal Festival Hall]] demanding an end to groups within the party. After the PLP voted 188–51 to ban such groups Bevan insisted, over the wishes of Foot and Crossman, that the Bevanite group be disbanded. The Shadow Cabinet elections (elected by Labour MPs when the party was in opposition) were topped by [[Jim Griffiths]] and [[Chuter Ede]]. Gaitskell was in third place with 179 votes. Bevan, who had just challenged Morrison unsuccessfully for the Deputy Leadership, scraped on in twelfth and last place with 108 votes.<ref name="Campbell 2010, p219-21" />

=== 1953–54 ===
[[Tony Benn]] wrote of Gaitskell (24 September 1953) "he is intellectually arrogant, obstinate and patronising. I respect – but cannot quite admire – him".<ref name="Campbell 2010, p222">Campbell 2010, p222</ref>

Relations between Bevan and Gaitskell continued to be acrimonious. On one occasion in 1953, when Gaitskell called for unity at a Shadow Cabinet meeting, Bevan was observed to give him "a glare of concentrated hatred" and declared: "You're too young in the movement to know what you're talking about".<ref>Campbell 2010, p221</ref> Bevan resigned from the Shadow Cabinet in April 1954 over Labour's support for the setting-up of [[SEATO]].<ref name="Campbell 2010, p222" />

Bevan stood against Gaitskell for [[Treasurer of the Labour Party|Party Treasurer]], knowing he would likely lose but hoping to discredit union bosses [[Arthur Deakin]] and [[Tom Williamson, Baron Williamson|Tom Williamson]] in the eyes of rank-and-file trade union members. In the event even [[Sam Watson (trade unionist)|Sam Watson]], leader of Bevan's own miners' union, supported Gaitskell. Gaitskell won by 4.3 million votes to 2 million. Bevan gave a speech to the ''Tribune'' party at the conference, declaring that the Labour Leader needed to be a "desiccated calculating machine". He was widely and probably wrongly thought to be referring to Gaitskell, to whom the label stuck. In fact it may well have been aimed at Attlee who had the previous day warned against "emotionalism" whilst privately Bevan thought that Gaitskell was highly emotional and, as he had shown in 1951, "couldn't count".<ref>Campbell 2010, p222-3</ref> The Treasurership election was seen as particularly important as it was lining up a successor to Attlee, whose retirement was clearly fairly imminent.<ref>Pelling 1992, p235</ref>

=== 1955 ===
In March 1955 Bevan, who had given no hint of disagreement with party policy at the party meeting a few days earlier, now challenged Attlee in a House of Commons debate to demand terms for use of the new [[H-Bomb]] in return for Labour's support for the weapon. He and 62 other abstained in the vote, leading to demands from loyalists that the party whip be withdrawn from him as a preliminary to him being formally expelled from the Labour Party by the NEC.<ref>Campbell 2010, p223-4</ref>

Writing a few days later, Gaitskell claimed to have felt that "sooner or later [Bevan] would have to go, but I was not sure whether this was the right moment" (19 March). However, Gaitskell told an audience at [[Doncaster]] that Bevan had made "a direct challenge to the elected Leader of our Party" and accused him of not being a team player. At a party meeting a few days later (16 March) Bevan accused Gaitskell of having told a direct lie against him and declared that it was "those hatchet-faced men sitting on the platform" who were undermining the leadership. After a lukewarm summing up by Attlee the PLP voted by 114–112 to withdraw the whip from Bevan.<ref name="Campbell 2010, p224-5">Campbell 2010, p224-5</ref>

Gaitskell felt he had to follow the lead of the unions and pushed for Bevan's expulsion, telling Crossman (24 March) that Ian Mikardo was running a Bevanite organisation in the constituency parties to make Bevan leader. When Crossman interjected that Bevan "was only half wanting" to be leader, had not made any conspiracy against Attlee and was mainly concerned at voicing protests against Morrison and Gaitskell, the latter replied that "there are extraordinary parallels between Nye and Adolf Hitler. They are demagogues of exactly the same sort ... There are minor differences but what is striking is the resemblance". Summoned to appear before an NEC sub-committee, Bevan refused to be "cornered by Gaitskell". In the event Gaitskell intervened only once at the meeting, asking Bevan to give a pledge that he would not attack the leader – Bevan refused as it was "a trap". Bevan's apology for his rebellion over the H-Bomb was accepted. Gaitskell described the result (2 April) as "a stalemate ... my own position is no doubt weaker".<ref name="Campbell 2010, p224-5" /> Gaitskell thought the need to move against Bevan "dirty work" (April 1955).<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.289" />

The [[1955 United Kingdom general election|May 1955 General Election]] was the first since 1931 in which Labour's vote had not increased. In ''Tribune'' on 21 June 1955 Gaitskell poured scorn on the idea that more left-wing policies (or, as he put it, policies more similar to those of the Communist Party) would have won Labour more votes. Campbell argues that "history overwhelmingly supports" Gaitskell's argument that elections are won by appealing to the centre ground rather than to a party's core base, tempting as the latter strategy often is to parties in opposition.<ref>Campbell 2010, p226</ref>

At the [[Margate]] conference that autumn Gaitskell gave a stirring and well-received speech including an apparently unscripted passage stressing his own socialist credentials and arguing that nationalisation was still a "vital means" to achieving that end. Bevan was observed to be watching the speech "red-faced and furious" and complaining of Gaitskell's "sheer demagogy".<ref name="Campbell 2010, p226-7">Campbell 2010, p226-7</ref> In October 1955 Gaitskell was re-elected Party Treasurer by a wider margin over Bevan than the previous year.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.289" />

The apparent congruence between Gaitskell's economic policies and those of his Conservative successor as chancellor [[Rab Butler]], who had retained and extended NHS charges, was sometimes labelled "Butskellism" by the press. This view was not shared by Gaitskell himself, and after Butler's emergency "Pots and Pans" budget in October 1955, in which he reversed tax cuts made prior to the Conservatives' re-election at the general election earlier that year, he attacked him strongly for allegedly having misled the electorate.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.289" /> Gaitskell won further praise for his attacks on Butler.<ref name="Campbell 2010, p226-7" />

==Party leader==
Following the retirement of Attlee as leader in December 1955, Gaitskell stood for party leader against Bevan and the ageing [[Herbert Morrison]]. At that time (and until 1981) the Labour Party leader was elected solely by MPs. In a final effort to stave off an inevitable Gaitskell victory, Bevan proposed that he and Gaitskell both withdraw in Morrison's favour, but Gaitskell rejected the offer.<ref>Campbell 2010, p227</ref> Gaitskell comfortably defeated Bevan (Morrison came a poor third) in the [[1955 Labour Party leadership election|party leadership contest]].<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.289" /> [[Chuter Ede]] described the leadership election as "the political funeral of two of the greatest publicity mongers I've ever known," adding that Gaitskell had never actively sought publicity.<ref>Williams 1985, p367</ref>

Gaitskell told a friend that "The leadership came to me so early because Bevan threw it at me by his behaviour", a view shared by Attlee and [[Harold Wilson]]. Gaitskell was very inexperienced for a party leader by the standards of the time. He offered Bevan a public olive branch at the party meeting after the result, promising that he would "not be outdone in generosity" if Bevan accepted the vote. Bevan agreed to do so, wishing Gaitskell "higher office".<ref>Campbell 2010, p228</ref>

Brivati writes that Gaitskell's 1951–55 "political performance ... has not received the credit it deserves, for energy, for strategy and for sheer nerve".<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.289" />

== Leader of the Opposition, 1955–1963 ==
=== Suez ===
In 1956 the Egyptian ruler Colonel [[Gamal Abdel Nasser]] nationalised the [[Suez Canal Company]], beginning the [[Suez Crisis]]. Gaitskell initially told the Prime Minister, Sir [[Anthony Eden]], and the Chancellor of the Exchequer [[Harold Macmillan]] at a dinner with King [[Faisal II]] of [[Iraq]] on 26 July 1956, that they would have the support of public opinion for the use of military action against Nasser, but warned Eden that he must act quickly and would have to keep the Americans closely informed.<ref name="Barry Turner 2006 pp 231-232">Barry Turner, ''Suez 1956'' (2006) pp 231-232.</ref><ref>Williams 1985, p419</ref> Gaitskell denounced Nasser's action at 11am on 27 July in the House of Commons debate.<ref>Thorpe 1989, p217-8</ref>

Gaitskell's position became more cautious during the summer, and he suggested the dispute with Egypt should be referred to the United Nations. His first speech on Suez (2 August 1956) attacked Nasser and was welcomed by many Conservatives, and implied that he would support the use of force, but in Brivati's view did not give enough emphasis to his stipulation that it be done through the United Nations.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.289" /> He had believed Eden's assurances that he had no intention of using force.<ref>Campbell 2010, p231</ref> In two letters to Eden sent on 3 and 10 August Gaitskell condemned Nasser, but warned that he would not support any action that violated the United Nations charter.<ref name="Barry Turner 2006 pp 231-232" /> In his letter of 10 August, Gaitskell wrote: "Lest there should be any doubt in your mind about my personal attitude, let me say that I could not regard an armed attack on Egypt by ourselves and the French as justified by anything which Nasser has done so far or as consistent with the Charter of the United Nations. Nor, in my opinion, would such an attack be justified in order to impose a system of international control over the canal – desirable though this is. If, of course, the whole matter were to be taken to the United Nations and if Egypt were to be condemned by them as aggressors, then, of course, the position would be different. And if further action which amounted to obvious aggression by Egypt were taken by Nasser, then again it would be different. So far what Nasser has done amounts to a threat, a grave threat to us and to others, which certainly cannot be ignored; but it is only a threat, not in my opinion justifying retaliation by war."<ref name="Barry Turner 2006 pp 231-232" />

Gaitskell passionately condemned the eventual Anglo-French military intervention to secure the Suez Canal, supposedly launched to enforce international law and to separate the Egyptian and Israeli combatants; the Israeli attack had in fact been launched in collusion with the British and French to supply a pretext for the invasion.<ref name="Barry Turner 2006 pp 231-232" /> On 31 October he publicly called the invasion "an act of disastrous folly" which threatened the Atlantic Alliance, the United Nations and Commonwealth solidarity.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.289" /> On 4 November 1956 Gaitskell gave a powerful broadcast, attacking the Prime Minister now it was clear Eden had been lying to him in private. Gaitskell was accused by the Conservatives of trying to appeal to the Labour Left, and of betrayal.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.289" /><ref>Turner, ''Suez 1956'', p 232.</ref>

Gaitskell's stance on Suez attracted some Liberal support. The pollster Mark Abrams convinced him of the need to broaden Labour's appeal by picking up anti-colonialist votes, but this would be a development of longer-term importance to the Labour Party. At the time Gaitskell was much-criticised in the press, especially for his ill-judged and unsuccessful plea for Tory dissidents to remove Eden from power.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.290" /> The Conservatives not only attacked Gaitskell as unpatriotic for failing to support British troops in action, but also tried to exploit perceived differences between Gaitskell and Bevan, who had rejoined the Shadow Cabinet earlier in the year and who had now been promoted to Shadow Foreign Secretary. Crossman noted that this forced Bevan to be loyal to Gaitskell (15 December 1956), making the two men allies of a kind.<ref>Campbell 2010, p231-2</ref>

=== Nationalisation and political philosophy ===
Gaitskell was a consensual leader in 1955–59, in contrast to his earlier and later image. Labour was widely expected to win the next general election and in Campbell's view he arguably did not give a clear enough lead or attack the Conservatives aggressively enough.<ref>Campbell 2010, p228-9</ref>

Gaitskell had initially believed nationalisation to be both morally right and economically efficient, and hoped in vain that manager-worker relations would be transformed.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.288" /> But in 1956 he published a Fabian pamphlet ''"Socialism and Nationalisation"'' (actually written three years earlier), arguing that there was no need for greater public ownership, and that his goals were full employment, [[industrial democracy]] and a greater spread of economic power. Gaitskell still supported physical controls and his views were a little to the left of those expressed by [[Anthony Crosland]] in ''"The Future of Socialism"'' (1956).<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.291">Matthew 2004, p.291</ref>

Gaitskell's political philosophy became known as [[Gaitskellism]], and from the late 1950s brought him into increasing conflict with the trade unions over nationalisation.<ref name=quizlet>{{cite web|url=https://quizlet.com/82580255/bevanism-vs-gaitskellites-labour-party-divisions-flash-cards |title='Bevanism' vs 'Gaitskellites' Labour Party Divisions flashcards |publisher=Quizlet |date=1956-07-26 |access-date=2016-03-29}}</ref> Besides repudiating the unquestioned commitment to public ownership of the means of production, now seen as merely one of numerous useful devices, he emphasised the goals of personal liberty, social welfare and above all social equality. Gaitskellism tended to downplay loyalty to the Labour movement as a central ethical goal, and argued that the new goals could be achieved if the government used appropriate fiscal and social policy measures within the context of a market-oriented mixed economy.<ref name="Richard Heffernan 2000 p 301" /> Gaitskell's cadre of supporters included [[Anthony Crosland]], [[Roy Jenkins]], [[Douglas Jay]], [[Patrick Gordon Walker]] and [[James Callaghan]].<ref>Brian Harrison, ''Seeking a Role: The United Kingdom 1951–1970'' (2011) ch 8.</ref>

[[Frank Cousins (British politician)|Frank Cousins]] became General Secretary of the TGWU in 1956, beginning the process whereby the unions began to shift left. The 1957 Conference endorsed the document ''"Industry and Society"'', which called for more flexibility, including state purchase of shares in small private firms. This was loudly condemned by Bevan's wife [[Jennie Lee, Baroness Lee of Asheridge|Jennie Lee]] and by [[Michael Foot]], editor of ''[[Tribune (magazine)|Tribune]]'' but out of Parliament at the time.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.290" />

=== 1959 general election ===
In the summer of 1959 Bevan supported Gaitskell on the NEC against Frank Cousins over unilateralism, which Bevan had opposed at the 1957 Conference, and nuclear tests (24 June 1959). Crossman believed Bevan could have overthrown Gaitskell (17 July 1959) and that both Bevan and Gaitskell thought Wilson an unprincipled careerist (13 August 1959).<ref>Campbell 2010, p236</ref> In the summer of 1959 Hugh and Dora Gaitskell, accompanied by Bevan, went to the [[USSR]] to copy Macmillan's recent successful trip.<ref>Campbell 2010, p236-7</ref>

At [[Newcastle upon Tyne|Newcastle]], with a general election clearly imminent, Gaitskell pledged that Labour's spending plans would not require him to raise income tax, for which he was attacked by the Tories for supposed irresponsibility.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.290" />

During the 1959 election campaign Crossman thought Gaitskell had become "a television star" with Bevan "a rather faded elder statesman behind him" (22 September 1959).<ref>Campbell 2010, p237</ref> The Labour Party had been widely expected to win the [[1959 United Kingdom general election|1959 general election]], but did not.<ref>David E. Butler and Richard Rose, ''The British General Election of 1959'' (1960)</ref> The Conservatives increased their majority, a fact partly attributable to the post-war prosperity that Britain was now experiencing.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.290" /> Gaitskell was undermined by public doubts about the credibility of proposals to raise pensions and by a highly effective Conservative campaign run by [[Harold Macmillan]] under the slogan "Life is better with the Conservatives, don't let Labour ruin it."<ref name="auto">{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/vote2001/in_depth/election_battles/1959_over.stm | work=BBC News | title=Election Battles 1945–1997}}</ref> This election defeat led to questions being asked as to whether Labour could ever win a general election again, but Gaitskell remained as leader.<ref name="auto" />

=== Clause IV ===
Following the election defeat, bitter internecine disputes resumed. Gaitskell blamed the Left for the defeat and attempted unsuccessfully to amend Labour's [[Clause IV]]—which its adherents believed committed the party to further [[nationalisation]] of industry, while Gaitskell and his followers believed it had become either superfluous or a political liability.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.291" />

On the Tuesday after the election Gaitskell lunched "bibulously" with Bevan at [[Asheridge]] in the [[Chilterns]] to discuss his plans for party reform. At this time he had no plans to revise Clause IV. He told Crossman (19 October) that Bevan simply wanted to succeed Jim Griffiths as deputy leader and had shown no inclination to resist moderate policies. After initially expressing surprise, Gaitskell accepted Crossman's advice that Bevan be allowed a veto over any change to nationalisation policy.<ref>Campbell 2010, p238</ref>

The November 1959 Conference, postponed because of the election, was already divided by rumours that Gaitskell was planning action over Clause IV. Ignoring advice from his allies, and partly motivated by detailed polling by Mark Abrams which showed that younger voters regarded Labour as old-fashioned, Gaitskell pushed for reform. Brivati writes that Clause IV was irrelevant in practice but Gaitskell had made "a frontal assault on ... a Labour equivalent of the [[Thirty-nine Articles]] of the [[Church of England]]".<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.291" />

Bevan saw Gaitskell's speech in advance and made no objection to it at the time. Gaitskell did not rule out further nationalisation, but saw it as a means to an end, pouring scorn on the idea that Labour should be committed to nationalising "the whole of light industry, the whole of agriculture, all the shops, every little pub and garage". Bevan now claimed he had "misunderstood or misheard" what Gaitskell planned and was reported to be "absolutely livid" and "wondering whether to blow the whole thing wide open". In the end he made a conciliatory speech, mentioning that Barbara Castle (who had attacked Gaitskell's proposal) and Gaitskell had both quoted his own dictum that Socialism was about controlling the "commanding heights" of the economy. He argued that according to the principles of [[Euclid]] if two things are equal to a third thing they must both be equal to one another, and so there could not be any real difference between Castle and Gaitskell.<ref>Campbell 2010, p238-9</ref>

Benn wrote (28 November 1959): "Nye's speech this afternoon was witty, scintillating, positive, conciliatory – the model of what a Leader should do. He didn't knock Hugh out but he gently elbowed him aside". The cartoonist "[[Victor Weisz|Vicky]]" showed Gaitskell pedalling to [[Blackpool]] on a [[Tandem bicycle|tandem]] with Bevan behind him – then pedalling back again but this time with Bevan in the front saddle (30 November 1959).<ref>Campbell 2010, p239</ref>

There was much talk that Bevan might now seize the party leadership, but it seems unlikely that he had the stomach for this anymore, not least as he had never wanted to be leader solely for its own sake. Gaitskell could no longer afford to quarrel with his deputy, and he enjoyed a position of great influence as keeper of the party's conscience, similar to, but much more powerful than, the position of [[John Prescott]] relative to [[Tony Blair]] forty years later. Moreover, by the end of 1959 Bevan was seriously unwell; he withdrew from the public eye and died in July 1960.<ref>Campbell 2010, p239-40</ref>

In March 1960 the NEC agreed a new statement of Labour's aims as an addition to Clause IV rather than a replacement. Throughout the summer of 1960 union conferences, many of whose rule books had their own equivalent to Clause IV, were hostile to the new proposal, and in the end four of the six largest unions opposed Gaitskell's plans. The new proposal was demoted to a "valuable expression".<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.291" />

=== Unilateral disarmament ===
[[Unilateral disarmament|Unilateral nuclear disarmament]] was increasingly popular amongst union activists and was also debated in several union conferences in the spring and summer of 1960. The great majority of the PLP supported [[NATO]] and multilateral disarmament.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.291" />

Gaitskell took on Frank Cousins and wanted to show that Labour were a party of government, not just of opposition. At the October 1960 [[Scarborough, North Yorkshire|Scarborough]] Conference two resolutions in favour of unilateral disarmament – proposed by the TGWU and the Engineers' Union – were carried, whilst the official policy document on defence was rejected. Gaitskell roused his supporters by promising to "Fight and Fight and Fight Again" to reverse the decision. Labour doctrine was that the Parliamentary Party had discretion over the timing of implementation of conference policy. In practice, in the 1940s and 1950s, the unions, whose block votes dominated conference, had been broadly supportive of the PLP, but this was now beginning to change.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.292">Matthew 2004, p.292</ref> Gaitskell was challenged unsuccessfully for the leadership by [[Harold Wilson]] [[1960 Labour Party leadership election|in November 1960]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.number10.gov.uk/history-and-tour/harold-wilson-2/ |title=Harold Wilson |website=number10.gov.uk |access-date=2011-07-31 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111011161640/http://www.number10.gov.uk/history-and-tour/harold-wilson-2/ |archive-date=11 October 2011 |df=dmy-all }}</ref>

The [[Blackpool]] Conference of October 1961 saw a narrow conference vote in favour of ''multi''lateral disarmament.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.292" /> Winning the unilateralism vote in 1961 restored Gaitskell's authority in the party and his reputation in the country.<ref name="Campbell 2010, p241">Campbell 2010, p241</ref> Unilateral nuclear disarmament remained a divisive issue, and many on the Left continued to call for a change of leadership. Gaitskell was again challenged unsuccessfully for the Labour leadership [[1961 Labour Party leadership election|in November 1961]], this time by [[Anthony Greenwood]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2010/10/16/where-have-all-the-scots-gone-and-are-they-coming-back-asks-kevin-meagher/|title=Where have all the Scots gone, and are they coming back, asks Kevin Meagher? " Labour Uncut|work=labour-uncut.co.uk|access-date=13 April 2016}}</ref>

The [[Campaign for Democratic Socialism]] was founded to promote the Gaitskellite cause – it never acquired much influence in the ranks of the trades unions, but achieved some success in promoting the selection of friendly Parliamentary candidates.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.292" /> Many of the younger CDS members would later be among the founding members of the [[Social Democratic Party (UK)|breakaway Social Democratic Party (SDP)]] in 1981.<ref name="Charlton">{{Cite book  | last1 = Charlton | first1 = Michael | author-link = Michael Charlton (journalist) | title = The Price of Victory | year = 1983 | publisher = [[BBC]] | location = London  | isbn = 0-563-20055-3 | page = 274 }}</ref>

[[Richard Hamilton (artist)|Richard Hamilton]] with his wife, Terry Hamilton, both supporters of [[Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament]], collaborated to produce ''Portrait of Hugh Gaitskell as a Famous Monster of Filmland'', 1964, with Richard completing the piece in 1964 after Terry's death in 1962. [[Arts Council England]] bought the piece for the national collection, which caused controversy. The painting was considered a tasteless attack. Hamilton stated in his posthumously published autobiography (written in the third person):

{{blockquote|When it was completed he was unhappy about the result. The painting did not have the aggression he had intended or the stylistic polarity he had aimed at. It was perhaps too smart-alecky, too clever: sarcasm was not the right tool for a subject that affected all humanity.<ref>Richard Hamilton, Philip Spectre, Introspective, 2019, (Köln:Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther König), p. 164</ref>}}

=== EEC entry ===
[[File:Hugh Todd Naylor Gaitskell.jpg|thumb|upright|Gaitskell in 1961]]
Gaitskell alienated some of his supporters by his opposition to British membership of the [[European Economic Community]], which Conservative Prime Minister [[Harold Macmillan|Macmillan]] had been seeking since July 1961. Although not entirely opposed in principle to British entry, he believed that the EEC was resistant to reform and that membership would hurt Britain's relations with the Commonwealth.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.292" /><ref>Williams 1985, pp.702-749</ref><ref>Roy Jenkins, ''A Life at the Center '' (1991) pp 136 – 45.</ref>

Gaitskell was particularly fearful that British membership would undermine ties with the Commonwealth. He was worried that the close-knit economic and political ties with Commonwealth nations would have to be dismantled, and replaced by the protectionist Common External Tariff and Common Agricultural Policy in the European Community. 

In a speech to the party conference in October 1962, Gaitskell argued that if the aim was for Britain to participate in a [[Federalisation of the European Union|Federal Europe]], this would mean "the end of Britain as an independent European state, the end of a thousand years of history!" He added: "You may say, all right! Let it end! But, my goodness, it's a decision that needs a little care and thought."<ref>[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=YZj5DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA9&dq=%22But,+my+goodness,+it%27s+a+decision+that+needs+a+little+care+and+thought.%22&hl=nl&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjoo9a33ICQAxW2R0EAHRpSCWoQ6AF6BAgIEAM#v=onepage&q=%22But%2C%20my%20goodness%2C%20it's%20a%20decision%20that%20needs%20a%20little%20care%20and%20thought.%22&f=false ''Reluctant European: Britain and the European Union from 1945 to Brexit''], Stephen Wall, Oxford University Press, 2020 page 9</ref> 

In the speech Gaitskell summoned up the memory of [[Vimy Ridge]] and [[Gallipoli campaign|Gallipoli]], where [[Canadian Corps|Canadian]] and [[ANZAC]] troops had fought alongside British, mixing his defence of national identity with the tradition of the Commonwealth. The speech dismayed many of Gaitskell's natural supporters but was applauded by many on the Left, causing his wife Dora to observe "all the wrong people are cheering".<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.292" />

== Death ==
In mid-December 1962, Gaitskell fell ill with [[flu]], but he was declared well enough by his doctor to travel to the [[Soviet Union]], where he met the Soviet leader [[Nikita Khrushchev]] for talks. Upon his return to Britain his condition deteriorated after he contracted another virus. On 4 January 1963 he was admitted to [[Middlesex Hospital]] in [[Marylebone]], where, despite efforts by doctors to save his life, he died on 18 January, with his wife at his bedside. He had died from complications following a sudden flare-up of [[lupus]], an [[autoimmune disease]], which had affected his heart and kidneys. He was 56.<ref>{{cite news|title=1963: Labour leader Hugh Gaitskell dies|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/january/18/newsid_3376000/3376971.stm|website=bbc.co.uk|date=18 January 1963|publisher=BBC|access-date=4 November 2014}}</ref><ref name="Howse" /><ref>{{cite web|title=Hugh Gaitskell|url=http://www.lupus.org.uk/news-events/celebrity/315-hugh-gaitskell|publisher=St. Thomas' Lupus Trust|access-date=4 September 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160915143607/http://www.lupus.org.uk/news-events/celebrity/315-hugh-gaitskell|archive-date=15 September 2016|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> Gaitskell's body was cremated at [[Golders Green Crematorium]] on 23 January 1963. His ashes are buried in the churchyard of [[St John-at-Hampstead Church]], north London. His wife died in 1989 and was buried alongside him.

Gaitskell had inherited £14,000 (around £800,000 at 2015 prices) from an aunt in April 1938, which was invested for him by a friend in the City and multiplied several times (at a time of relatively high inflation). Gaitskell appears to have largely ignored this sum of capital, and his wife had no idea of his wealth.<ref>Williams 1985, p80</ref> His estate was valued for probate at £80,013-10s-0d on 23 April 1963 (around £1.7m at 2020 prices).<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.293">Matthew 2004, p.293</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.measuringworth.com/ukcompare/result.php|title=Measuring Worth – Measures of worth, inflation rates, saving calculator, relative value, worth of a dollar, worth of a pound, purchasing power, gold prices, GDP, history of wages, average wage|access-date=9 June 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160331194822/https://measuringworth.com/ukcompare/result.php|archive-date=31 March 2016|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref>

The shock of Gaitskell's death was comparable to that of the sudden death of the later Labour Party leader [[John Smith (Labour Party leader)|John Smith]] in May 1994, when he too seemed to be on the threshold of Number 10.<ref name="Campbell 2010, p241" />

Beginning with his time as a minister under Attlee, Gaitskell kept a diary until 1956. The diary is an important primary source for the politics of the era.<ref>Campbell 2010, p.235</ref>

===Conspiracy theories===
Gaitskell's death left an opening for [[Harold Wilson]] in the party leadership; Wilson narrowly won the next [[1964 United Kingdom general election|general election]] for Labour 21 months later. The abrupt and unexpected nature of Gaitskell's death led to some speculation that [[crime|foul play]] might have been involved. The most [[Harold Wilson plot allegations|popular conspiracy theory]] involved a supposed Soviet [[KGB]] plot to ensure that Wilson (alleged by the supporters of these theories to be a KGB agent himself) became prime minister. This claim was given new life by [[Peter Wright (MI5 officer)|Peter Wright]]'s controversial 1987 book ''[[Spycatcher]]'', but the only evidence that ever came to light was the testimony of a Soviet [[defector]], [[Anatoliy Golitsyn]]. [[MI5]] repeatedly investigated Wilson over the course of several years before conclusively deciding that he had no relationship with the KGB.<ref>{{cite news|title=The 30 greatest conspiracy theories - part 2, 16 to 30|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/3483652/The-30-greatest-conspiracy-theories-part-2.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220112/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/3483652/The-30-greatest-conspiracy-theories-part-2.html |archive-date=12 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|newspaper=The Telegraph|access-date=13 July 2017}}{{cbignore}}</ref>

== Legacy ==
=== Gaitskellites and after ===
Gaitskell was adored by followers like [[Roy Jenkins]], who thought him a beacon of hope, decency and integrity, especially as Wilson's government came more and more to seem one of shabby compromises. Left-wingers like [[Barbara Castle]] loathed him for his intransigence. Many, including [[Tony Benn]] – a Labour centrist at the time – simply thought him a divisive figure and initially welcomed Wilson as a fresh start who could unite the party. In the event Wilson's closest allies as Prime Minister – Crossman and Castle – were former Bevanites.<ref name="Campbell 2010, p241-2">Campbell 2010, p241-2</ref>

However, many of the Gaitskellites held leading positions in [[Harold Wilson]]'s Cabinet of 1964–70. Many of them – e.g. [[Roy Jenkins]] and [[Bill Rodgers, Baron Rodgers of Quarry Bank|Bill Rodgers]] but not [[Anthony Crosland]] or [[Douglas Jay]] – became supporters of British membership of the EEC, an issue on which Labour was split in the 1970s and which helped to precipitate the SDP split of 1981.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.293" />

John Campbell writes that "the echoes of the Gaitskell-Bevan rivalry continued to divide the party right up to the 1980s".<ref>Campbell 2010, p196</ref> [[Neil Kinnock]] (Labour Leader 1983–92) grew up in [[South Wales]] and was brought up as an admirer of Bevan, but although he disliked the comparison his battle with the hard-left [[Militant tendency]] in the mid-1980s had echoes of Gaitskellism; [[John Smith (Labour Party leader)|John Smith]] (Labour Leader 1992–4) had been a Gaitskellite as a young man in the early 1960s; [[Tony Blair]]'s first act as leader in 1994 was finally to abolish Clause IV – for this and other acts he was supported by the elderly [[Roy Jenkins]], who had become a Liberal Democrat by then. Like Gaitskell before him, Blair was often seen by many of his enemies in the Labour Party as a public-school educated, middle-class interloper.<ref name="Campbell 2010, p241-2" />

[[Tony Benn]] contrasted Gaitskell's stand on the [[Suez Crisis]] to that of the former British Prime Minister [[Tony Blair]] on [[Iraq War|the war in Iraq]]. [[Margaret Thatcher]] compared Blair with Gaitskell in a different manner, warning her party when Blair came to power that he was the most formidable Labour leader since Hugh Gaitskell.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/thatcher-praises-formidable-blair-1621354.html|title=Thatcher praises 'formidable' Blair|website=[[Independent.co.uk]]|date=22 October 2011}}</ref>

=== Assessments ===
Gaitskell's socialism was, in Campbell's view, that of a public servant wanting to see the world more rationally governed.<ref name="Campbell 2010, p198" /> Gaitskell very likely might have become Prime Minister had he lived; however, he left no lasting monument other than "the fading memory of promise unfulfilled". Gaitskell, although no Marxist, was a sincere socialist but nonetheless was in some respects the first "moderniser" who saw how Labour would have to adapt to survive.<ref>Campbell 2010, p242-3</ref>

His longtime close friend [[Roy Jenkins]] concluded a decade afterwards, in an article which he later quoted in his memoirs:
:All his struggles illustrated some blemishes as well as exceptional strength. He would not have been a perfect prime minister. He was stubborn, rash, and could in a paradoxical way become too emotionally committed to an over-rational position which, once he had thought it rigorously through, he believed must be the final answer. He was only a moderately good judge of people. But when these faults are put in the scales and weighed against his qualities they shrivel away. He had purpose and direction, courage and humanity. He was a man for raising the sights of politics. He clashed on great issues. He avoided the petty bitterness of personal jealousy. You could raise a banner which men were proud to follow, but he never perverted his leadership ability; it was infused by sense and humour, and by a desire to change the world, not for his own satisfaction, but so that people might more enjoy living in it.... He was that very rare phenomenon, a great politician who was also an unusually agreeable man.<ref>Roy Jenkins, ''A Life at the Center '' (1991) pp 141-42</ref>

Because he never became prime minister, and because of the great capacity many considered that he had for the post, Hugh Gaitskell is remembered largely with respect from people both within and outside of the Labour Party. Gaitskell is regarded by some as "the best Prime Minister we never had".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/public-affairs/press-releases/index.phtml?menu=pressreleasesarchive&code=CAB-175/04&create_date=06-dec-2004|title=Press releases|work=nottingham.ac.uk|access-date=13 April 2016}}</ref>

Brivati acknowledged that he had "an almost reckless honesty and courage"<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.293" /> which could turn into stubbornness.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.288" /> "His leadership was a heroic failure" and "The defining moment of the post-war history of the Labour Party".<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.293" /> Although by 1963 Gaitskell appeared to be on the verge of leading Labour back into power, it still took what Brivati describes as "the greatest performance by a leader of the opposition [last] century" for [[Harold Wilson]] to lead Labour back by a narrow majority.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.292" />

Brivati writes that for Gaitskell "socialism was not an end state ... but the reform of institutions and practices for the more effective realisation of preferred values". Evan Durbin's ''Politics of Democratic Socialism'' (1940) was a seminal text.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.291" /> Gaitskell was not, in Brivati's view, a "progressive" in any modern sense. He favoured equality and thought the free market wasteful. He wanted to incorporate Liberal opinion within the Labour vote. However, the modernising leaders of subsequent generations, [[Neil Kinnock]] and [[Tony Blair]], were to a certain extent continuing Gaitskell's tradition.<ref name="Matthew 2004, p.293" />

=== Memorials ===
[[File:Holbeck Moor Road, Holbeck - geograph.org.uk - 529637.jpg|thumb|right|The Gaitskell flats in [[Holbeck]], [[Leeds]] were named after Gaitskell. They were demolished in 2010.]]
His name appears in popular culture from time to time. For example Hugh Gaitskell House is the building [[Nicholas Lyndhurst]]'s character, Garry Sparrow, is looking for in ''[[Goodnight Sweetheart (TV series)|Goodnight Sweetheart]]'' when he first stumbles into [[Second World War]] London. A tower block of that name can be found opposite [[Stoke Newington railway station]] in North London.

Hugh Gaitskell Primary School is situated in [[Beeston, Leeds|Beeston]], part of his former Leeds South constituency.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hughgaitskell.leeds.sch.uk|title=Hugh Gaitskell Primary School|work=hughgaitskell.leeds.sch.uk|access-date=13 April 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.multimap.com/map/browse.cgi?client=public&X=428500&Y=430500&width=700&height=400&gride=428671&gridn=430688&srec=0&coordsys=gb&db=pc&addr1=&addr2=&addr3=&pc=LS118AB&advanced=&local=&localinfosel=&kw=&inmap=&table=&ovtype=&keepicon=true&zm=0&scale=10000&out.x=3&out.y=11|title=Maps}}</ref> The area is now in the [[Leeds Central]] constituency, represented by [[Hilary Benn]].

In 1978, some 15 years after his death, a new housing development by [[Sandwell]] council in the [[Tividale]] area of the [[West Midlands (county)|West Midlands]] was named Gaitskell Terrace.

A portrait bust of Hugh Gaitskell was made by British sculptor [[Leslie Cubitt Bevis]] in 1964 and purchased by the [[National Portrait Gallery, London|National Portrait Gallery]] in 1967.

Gaitskell was buried in Hampstead, and a memorial plaque to his name is prominently placed in the cloisters of [[New College, Oxford]].

== References ==
<!--See [[Wikipedia:Footnotes]] for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags-->
{{reflist|20em}}

== Bibliography ==
* Brivati, Brian. "Gaitskell, Hugh Todd Naylor (1906–1963)", ''Oxford Dictionary of National Biography'' (Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn, Jan 2011) [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/33309, accessed 26 June 2016] doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/33309 (print edition listed under "Matthew" below)
* Brivati, Brian. ''Hugh Gaitskell'' (2006) London: Politico's Publishing/Methuen. {{ISBN|978-1842751862}}
* Davies, A.J. ''To Build a New Jerusalem: The Labour Movement from the 1880s to the 1990'' (1992) Abacus {{ISBN|0-349-10809-9}}
* {{cite book| last = Campbell| first = John| author-link = John Campbell (biographer)| year = 2010| title = Pistols at Dawn: Two Hundred Years of Political Rivalry from Pitt and Fox to Blair and Brown| location = London| publisher = Vintage| isbn = 978-1-84595-091-0| url-access = registration| url = https://archive.org/details/pistolsatdawntwo0000camp}} (contains an essay on Gaitskell and Bevan)
* {{cite book|last1=Dell|first1=Edmund|author-link1=Edmund Dell|year=1997|title=The Chancellors: A History of the Chancellors of the Exchequer, 1945–90|location=London|publisher=HarperCollins|isbn=978-0-00-638418-2}} (pp.&nbsp;135–58 covers his term as Chancellor)
* Dutton, David. ''British Politics Since 1945: The Rise, Fall and Rebirth of Consensus'' (2nd ed. Blackwell, 1997). [https://www.amazon.com/British-Politics-Since-1945-Association/dp/0631203206/ excerpt] for political history seen from the Post-War Consensus viewpoint.
* Jones, Tudor. ''Remaking the Labour Party: From Gaitskell to Blair'' (1996) [https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0415125502/sr=1-5/qid=1371477701/ excerpt and text search]
* {{cite book |editor-last = Matthew |editor-first = Colin |editor-link=Colin Matthew |year=2004 |title=Dictionary of National Biography |volume=21 |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-861411-1}}, essay on Gaitskell written by [[Brian Brivati]]
* {{cite book|last1=Pelling|first1=Henry|author-link1=Henry Pelling|year=1992|orig-date=1963|title= A History of British Trade Unionism |location=London|publisher=Penguin|isbn=978-0-14-013640-1}}
* {{cite book|last = Thorpe|first = D. R.|author-link = D. R. Thorpe|year = 1989|title = Selwyn Lloyd|location = London|publisher = Jonathan Cape Ltd|isbn = 978-0-224-02828-8|url-access = registration|url = https://archive.org/details/selwynlloyd0000thor}}
* {{cite book|last = Williams|first = Philip|author-link = Philip Maynard Williams|year = 1985|orig-year=1979|title = Hugh Gaitskell|location = London|publisher = Jonathan Cape Ltd|isbn = 978-0-224-01451-9}}
* {{cite book|editor-last = Williams|editor-first = Philip|year = 1983|orig-year=1979|title = The Diary of Hugh Gaitskell 1945-1956|location = London|publisher = Jonathan Cape Ltd|isbn = 978-0-224-01911-8}}

== External links ==
{{Wikiquote}}
* [https://archives.ucl.ac.uk/CalmView/Record.aspx?src=CalmView.Catalog&id=GAITSKELL Gaitskell Papers] at [[University College London]]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20090527201439/http://www.labourhistory.org.uk/?p=20 labourhistory.org.uk] – Biography of Gaitskell.
* {{Hansard-contribs | mr-hugh-gaitskell | Hugh Gaitskell }}
* {{PM20|FID=pe/005779}}

{{s-start}}
{{s-par|uk}}
{{succession box
  | title  = [[Member of Parliament (United Kingdom)|Member of Parliament]] for [[Leeds South (UK Parliament constituency)|Leeds South]]
  | years  = [[1945 United Kingdom general election|1945]]–[[1963 Leeds South by-election|1963]]
  | before = [[Henry Charleton]]
  | after  = [[Merlyn Rees]]
}}
{{s-off}}
{{succession box|before=[[William Foster (British politician)|William Foster]]|after=[[Alfred Robens]]|title=[[Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Fuel and Power]]|years=1946–1947}}
{{succession box|before=[[Manny Shinwell]]|after=[[Philip Noel-Baker]]|title=[[Minister of Fuel and Power]]|years=1947–1950}}
{{s-bef | rows=2 | before=[[Sir Stafford Cripps]]}}
{{s-ttl | title=[[Secretary of State for Economic Affairs|Minister for Economic Affairs]] | years=1950<sup>1</sup>}}
{{s-vac | reason=Office abolished | next=[[Arthur Salter, 1st Baron Salter|Sir Arthur Salter]]}}
|-
{{s-ttl | title=[[Chancellor of the Exchequer]] | years=1950–1951}}
{{s-aft | after=[[Rab Butler]]}}
{{succession box | title=[[Treasurer of the Labour Party]] | before=[[Arthur Greenwood]] | after=[[Aneurin Bevan]] | years= 1954–1956}}
{{s-bef | rows=2 | before=[[Clement Attlee]]}}
{{s-ttl | title=[[Leader of the Labour Party (UK)|Leader of the Labour Party]] | years=1955–1963}}
{{s-aft | rows=2 | after=[[Harold Wilson]]}}
|-
{{s-ttl | title=[[Leader of the Opposition (UK)|Leader of the Opposition]] | years=1955–1963}}
{{s-ref | {{cite web |title=List of Ministers |url=http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/releases/2006/march/ministers.htm |website=[[The National Archives (United Kingdom)|The National Archives]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071120023511/http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/releases/2006/march/ministers.htm |archive-date=2007-11-20 |url-status=dead}} }}{{Labour Party Leader}}{{Hugh Gaitskell|state=collapsed}}
{{British Chancellors of the Exchequer}}
{{Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change}}
{{Shadow Chancellors of the Exchequer}}
{{Leaders of the Opposition UK}}
{{UK Labour Party}}
{{Labour Party leadership election, 1955}}
{{Authority control}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Gaitskell, Hugh}}
[[Category:Hugh Gaitskell| ]]
[[Category:1906 births]]
[[Category:1963 deaths]]
[[Category:Academics of Birkbeck, University of London]]
[[Category:Academics of University College London]]
[[Category:Alumni of New College, Oxford]]
[[Category:Bisexual male politicians]]
[[Category:British Eurosceptics]]
[[Category:British MPs who died in office]]
[[Category:Burials at St John-at-Hampstead]]
[[Category:Chancellors of the Exchequer of the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Commanders of the Order of the British Empire]]
[[Category:Deaths from lupus]]
[[Category:People with lupus]]
[[Category:British bisexual men]]
[[Category:English bisexual politicians]]
[[Category:British politicians with disabilities]]
[[Category:English expatriates in Austria]]
[[Category:LGBTQ members of the Parliament of the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Labour Party (UK) MPs for English constituencies]]
[[Category:Leaders of the Labour Party (UK)]]
[[Category:Leaders of the opposition (United Kingdom)]]
[[Category:Members of the Fabian Society]]
[[Category:Members of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Members of the Steering Committee of the Bilderberg Group]]
[[Category:Ministers in the Attlee governments, 1945–1951]]
[[Category:People educated at The Dragon School]]
[[Category:People educated at Winchester College]]
[[Category:Spouses of life peers]]
[[Category:UK MPs 1945–1950]]
[[Category:UK MPs 1950–1951]]
[[Category:UK MPs 1951–1955]]
[[Category:UK MPs 1955–1959]]
[[Category:UK MPs 1959–1964]]
[[Category:Workers' Educational Association]]