View source for King's Counsel

{{Short description|Honorific for lawyers in some Commonwealth realms}}
{{distinguish|Privy council|Law officers of the Crown}}
{{redirect|Queen's Counsel|the satire in ''The Times''|Queen's Counsel (comic strip)}}
{{Use British English|date=June 2019}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2020}}
[[File:QC Court robes.jpg|thumb|upright=1.1|A 1903 caricature of King's Counsel [[Robert McCall (barrister)|Robert McCall]], wearing his court robes at the Bar of England and Wales. For court, he wears a short wig, and [[Bands (neckwear)|bands]] instead of lace at the collar, but he retains the silk gown and court tailcoat worn on ceremonial occasions.]]

A '''King's Counsel''' ([[Post-nominal letters|post-nominal initials]] '''KC''') is a senior [[lawyer]] appointed by the monarch (or their [[Viceroy|vice-regal]] representative) of some [[Commonwealth realm]]s as a "counsel learned in the law". When the reigning monarch is a woman, the title is '''Queen's Counsel''' ('''QC''').

The position originated in England and Wales but is now to be found in other Commonwealth realms. Some [[Jurisdiction|jurisdictions]] have retained the designation, while others have either abolished the appointment or renamed it so as to remove its monarchical nomenclature — for example, to "[[Senior Counsel]]" or "Senior Advocate".

Appointment as King's Counsel is an office recognised by [[court]]s. KCs in the UK have the privilege of sitting within the inner [[Bar (law)|bar]] of court. As members wear silk gowns of a particular design, appointment as King's Counsel is known informally as ''taking silk'' and KCs are often colloquially called '''silks'''.<ref>''Oxford English Dictionary,'' v. Silk.</ref> Appointments are made from within the legal profession, sometimes after an application process administered by a legal professional association (eg, the local bar council).  This process is designed to yield appointees based on merit and, it is said, not a particular level of experience. Nevertheless, successful applicants are normally [[barrister]]s (or, in Scotland, [[advocate]]s) with at least 10-15 years of experience.

In most Canadian jurisdictions, the designation is regulated by formal statute, such as, for example, "King's Counsel Act" of British Columbia, that requires the candidates to have a minimum five years of experience, and to have made an outstanding contribution to the practice of law with high professional standards and good character and repute.<ref>{{Cite web |title=King's Counsel nomination process |url=https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/justice/for-legal-professionals/kings-counsel |access-date=2024-09-18 |website=Government of British Columbia}}</ref>

== Historical origins in England and Wales==


===Historical background===

[[File:William Ballantine Vanity Fair 5 March 1870 (crop).jpg|thumb|upright=1.1|Caricature of Serjeant [[William Ballantine]] SL wearing [[court dress]]. The extremely small skullcap on the very top of the wig is a vestigal [[coif]], worn only by [[serjeant-at-law|serjeants-at-law]]. Caption reads "He resisted the temptation to cross-examine a [[Prince du sang|Prince of the blood]]"; Vanity Fair, 5 March 1870]]

The [[Attorney General for England and Wales|attorney general]], [[Solicitor General for England and Wales|solicitor-general]] and [[Serjeant-at-law|king's serjeants]] were King's Counsel in Ordinary in the [[Kingdom of England]]. The first Queen's Counsel ''Extraordinary'' was Sir [[Francis Bacon]], who was given a patent giving him precedence at the Bar in 1597, and formally styled King's Counsel in 1603.<ref>Holdsworth, W.S. ''History of English Law''. 1938 vi 473–4.</ref><ref>''[[Patent Rolls]]'', 2 Jac I p 12 m 10.</ref> The right of precedence before the Court granted to Bacon became a hallmark of the early King's Counsel. True to their name, King's and Queen's Counsel initially were representatives of the Crown. The right of precedence and pre-audience bestowed upon them – a form of seniority that allowed them to address the court before others – allowed for the swift resolution of Crown litigation.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Dawson |first1=NM |title=The Rank of Queen's Counsel: Judicial Perspectives |journal=King's Law Journal |date=2011 |volume=23 |issue=3 |page=39 |doi=10.5235/09615768.24.1.38 |s2cid=144615642 }}</ref>

The new rank of King's Counsel contributed to the gradual obsolescence of the formerly more senior [[serjeant-at-law]] by superseding it. The attorney-general and solicitor-general had similarly succeeded the king's serjeants as leaders of the Bar in [[House of Tudor|Tudor]] times, though not technically senior until 1623, except for the two senior king's serjeants, and 1813, respectively.<ref>Baker, J. H. "The English Legal Profession 1450–1550", ''Lawyers in Early Modern Europe and America'' (Wilfred Prest (ed.)), 1981, 20.</ref>

King's Counsel came to prominence during the early 1830s, prior to which they were relatively few in number. It became the standard means to recognise a [[barrister]] as a senior member of the profession, and the numbers multiplied accordingly.<ref name=duman>Duman, Daniel. ''The English and Colonial Bars in the Nineteenth Century''. 1983.</ref> It became of greater professional importance to become a KC, and the serjeants gradually declined. The KCs inherited the prestige of the serjeants and their priority before the courts. The earliest English law list, published in 1775, lists 165 members of the Bar, of whom 14 were King's Counsel, a proportion of about 8.5%. {{As of|2010}} roughly the same proportion existed, though the number of barristers had increased to about 12,250 in independent practice (i.e., excluding pupil barristers and employed barristers).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.barcouncil.org.uk/assets/documents/1%20Self%20Employed%20Bar%20excl%20Pupils%20by%20Ethnicity%20and%20Gender.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.barcouncil.org.uk/assets/documents/1%20Self%20Employed%20Bar%20excl%20Pupils%20by%20Ethnicity%20and%20Gender.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live|title=Self-Employed Bar by Ethnicity and Gender|publisher=The Bar Council of the United Kingdom|work=barcouncil.org.uk|date=11 December 2009|access-date=19 March 2011}}{{dead link|date=July 2017|bot=InternetArchiveBot|fix-attempted=yes}}</ref>

In 1839, the number of Queen's Counsel was seventy.<ref name="104LT98">(1898) 104 Law Times 98 [https://books.google.com/books?id=XzJHAQAAMAAJ&q=%22number+of+Queen%27s+Counsel%22 Google Books].</ref> In 1882, the number of Queen's Counsel was 187.<ref>Edward Parker Wolstenholme and Richard Ottaway Turner. The Conveyancing and Law of Property Act, 1881, and the Vendor and Purchaser Act, 1874, with Notes. W Clowes. 1882. p. viii. [https://books.google.com/books?id=OGs0AAAAIAAJ Google Books]</ref> The list of Queen's Counsel in the Law List of 1897 gave the names of 238,<ref name=104LT98/> of whom hardly one third appeared to be in actual practice.<ref>{{cite book | first=Alexander | last=Pulling | title=The Order of the Coif | publisher=W Clowes & Sons | year=1897 | page=[https://archive.org/details/ordercoif01pullgoog/page/n251 206] | url=https://archive.org/details/ordercoif01pullgoog | access-date=1 January 2018}}</ref> In 1959, the number of practising Queen's Counsel was 181.<ref name=HCDeb6Mar1989>[[Hansard|HC Deb]] 6 March 1989 vol 148 [https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1989/mar/06/queens-counsel col 596] per Mayhew AG</ref> In each of the five years up to 1970, the number of practising Queen's Counsel was 208, 209, 221, 236 and 262, respectively.<ref>HC Deb 22 July 1970 vol 804 [https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1970/jul/22/maximum-number-of-judges-order-1970#column_697 col 697] per Crowder MP.</ref> In each of the years 1973 to 1978, the number of practising Queen's Counsel was 329, 345, 370, 372, 384 and 404, respectively.<ref>Final Report of the Royal Commission on Legal Services. [[Command paper|Cmnd]] 7648. HMSO. London. October 1979. Volume One. p. 479.</ref> In 1989, the number of practising Queen's Counsel was 601.<ref name="HCDeb6Mar1989" /> In each of the years 1991 to 2000, the number of practising Queen's Counsel was 736, 760, 797, 845, 891, 925, 974, 1006, 1043, and 1072, respectively.<ref>HC Deb 13 November 2000 vol 356 [https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/written-answers/2000/nov/13/queens-counsel col 545W] per Lock MP</ref>

In the 19th century in England, the position was primarily one of rank within the profession, giving the holder certain rights and privileges in the courts. They were ranked as senior counsel, and took precedence in argument after the Attorney General and the Solicitor General of England.  Barristers who were not King's (or Queen's) Counsel were termed [[junior barrister]]s, and followed senior barristers in argument.  King's (or Queen's) Counsel normally always appeared in courts with a junior barrister, and led the direction of the case.  The junior barrister on a case could not disagree with the direction determined by the senior barrister.<ref>Earl of Halsbury et al., ''The Laws of England'', 1st ed. (London:  Butterworth & Co., 1908), vol II (Barristers), paras. 650, 651.</ref>

On colonial appeals to the [[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council]], established in 1833, the rule originally was that the case had to be led by a Queen's Counsel from England, even if the colonial counsel held the same rank in the colonial courts.  This rule was not eliminated until 1884, half a century after the establishment of the Judicial Committee.<ref name=Halsbury651>Halsbury, ''The Laws of England'', para 651, note (''p'').</ref>

Gradually, the appointment as King's Counsel or Queen's Counsel shifted from a vocational calling to a badge of honour and prestige. In 1898, [[William Watson, Baron Watson|Lord Watson]] noted in his opinion in ''Attorney General of the Dominion of Canada v. Attorney General for the Province of Ontario,'' writing on behalf of the [[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council]], that:

{{Blockquote|The exact position occupied by a Queen's Counsel duly appointed is a subject which might admit of a good deal of discussion. It is in the nature of an office under the Crown, although any duties which it entails are almost as unsubstantial as its emoluments; and it is also in the nature of an honour or dignity to this extent, that it is a mark and recognition by the Sovereign of the professional eminence of the counsel upon whom it is conferred.<ref name="bailii.org">[http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/1897/1897_49.html ''Attorney General for the Dominion of Canada v Attorney General for the Province of Ontario''], [1897] UKPC 49, [1898] AC 247.</ref>
}}

===Restrictions===

Until the late 19th century, some barristers were granted a [[patent of precedence]] in order to obtain the same precedence as a KC without the concomitant restrictions. King's Counsel were originally considered an [[office of profit]] and hence, under the [[Act of Settlement 1701]], incompatible with membership of the [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]].<ref name="jstor44505852">{{cite journal |title=Current Events |journal=Irish Jurist |date=May 1935 |volume=1 |issue=2 |page=9 |jstor=44505852 |issn=0021-1273}}</ref> KCs were also required to take the [[Oath of Supremacy]], which [[Daniel O'Connell]] refused as a [[Catholic Church in Ireland|Roman Catholic]]. Despite being the most prominent and best-paid barrister in Ireland, he was a junior counsel for 30 years until granted a patent of precedence in 1831.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Gallagher |first1=Paul |title=Daniel O'Connell – The Barrister |journal=Irish Judicial Studies Journal |date=2017 |volume=1 |page=76 |url=https://www.judicialstudiesjournal.ie/assets/uploads/documents/pdfs/2017-Edition-01/Daniel%20O'Connell%20the%20Barrister%20Paul%20Gallagher%20SC.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://www.judicialstudiesjournal.ie/assets/uploads/documents/pdfs/2017-Edition-01/Daniel%20O'Connell%20the%20Barrister%20Paul%20Gallagher%20SC.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |access-date=27 June 2020}}</ref>

From the beginning, KCs were not allowed to appear against [[the Crown]] without a special licence, but this was generally given as a formality. This stipulation was particularly important in criminal cases, which are mostly brought in the name of the Crown. The result was that, until 1920 in [[England and Wales]], KCs had to have a licence to appear in criminal cases for the defence. King's Counsel and serjeants were prohibited, at least from the mid-nineteenth century, from drafting [[pleading]]s alone; a junior barrister had to be retained. They could not appear in judges' chambers or inferior courts, either, other than in exceptional cases. They were not permitted to appear in court without a junior barrister, and they had to have [[barristers' chambers]] in London.<ref name=duman/><ref name=Halsbury651/>

These restrictions had a number of consequences: they made the taking of silk something of a professional risk, because the appointment abolished some of the staple work of the junior barrister; they made the use of leading counsel more expensive, and therefore ensured that they were retained only in more important cases; and they protected the work of the junior bar, which could not be excluded by the retention of leading counsel. By the end of the twentieth century, however, all of these rules had been abolished. Appointment as QC has been said to be a matter of status and prestige only, with no formal disadvantages.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/english-legal-system/the-role-of-queens-counsel.php?vref=1|title=The role of queens counsel|last=Teacher|first=Law|date=November 2013|website=Law Teacher|publisher=LawTeacher.net|location=Nottingham, UK|access-date=10 February 2019}}</ref>

In the 21st century, King's Counsel continue to have the seniority in audience, following the Attorney General and the Solicitor General.  It is still the rule that junior counsel must follow the lead of senior counsel in pleading a case, and cannot depart from senior counsel's approach to the issues.<ref>Lord Hailsham of St Marylebone et al., ''Laws of England'', 4th ed. reissue (London:  Butterworths, 1989), vol 3(1), para. 434.</ref>

===Women appointed===

The first woman appointed King's Counsel was [[Helen Kinnear]] in Canada in 1934.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://lso.ca/getdoc/9d09e05a-0448-4a92-b108-3328d01a2c9f/helen-kinnear|title=Helen Kinnear|last=Brown|first=Deidré Rowe|website=Law Society of Ontario|access-date=2019-02-10}}</ref> The first women to be appointed as King's Counsel in England and Wales were [[Helena Normanton]] and [[Rose Heilbron]] in 1949. They were preceded by [[Margaret Kidd]] KC (later Dame Margaret Kidd QC) appointed a KC in Scotland in 1948.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://first100years.org.uk/helena-normanton/|title=Helena Normanton|date=2014-10-15|website=First 100 Years|access-date=2019-02-10}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/2005/dec/13/guardianobituaries.gender|title=Obituary: Dame Rose Heilbron|last=Morton|first=James|date=2005-12-13|work=The Guardian|access-date=2019-02-10|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> In Australia, the first QC appointed was [[Roma Mitchell]], appointed 1962, who later became the first female [[Judge|Justice]] of the [[Supreme Court of South Australia]] (1965), and then the first female Acting Chief Justice.

==Recent developments in the United Kingdom==

{{More citations needed|section|date=July 2021}}

===England and Wales===

In 1994, solicitors of England and Wales became entitled to gain [[rights of audience]] in the higher courts, and some 275 were so entitled in 1995. In 1995, these solicitors became entitled to apply for appointment as Queen's Counsel. The first two solicitors were appointed on 27 March 1997, out of 68 new QCs. These were Arthur Marriott<!-- do not link Marriott, goes to a non-lawyer cricketer -->, partner in the London office of the [[Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr]], and [[Lawrence Collins, Baron Collins of Mapesbury|Lawrence Collins]], a partner in the [[City of London]] law firm [[Herbert Smith]]. Collins was subsequently appointed a [[High Court judge (England and Wales)|High Court judge]] and ultimately a [[Justice of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.number10.gov.uk/output/Page10697.asp |title=Appointment of Justice Lawrence Collins |date=8 January 2007 |publisher=Office of the [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom]] |access-date=30 January 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071005150259/http://www.number10.gov.uk/output/Page10697.asp |archive-date=5 October 2007 }}</ref>

The appointment of new Queen's Counsel was suspended in 2003, and it was widely expected that the system would be abolished. However, a vigorous campaign was mounted in defence of the system. Supporters included those who considered it as an independent indication of excellence to those (especially foreign commercial litigants) who did not have much else to go on,<ref>{{cite web | title=Building on Strength: The response of the Commercial Bar Association | url=http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/supremecourt/responses/sc033.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/supremecourt/responses/sc033.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |pages=39–57 (15ff in the PDF) | date=3 November 2003 |access-date=17 February 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title=Letter from the Lord Mayor of the City of London | author=Gavyn Arthur | url=http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/qcfuture/responses/qc014.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/qcfuture/responses/qc014.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live | date=5 November 2003 |access-date=17 February 2009}}</ref> and those who contended that it was a means whereby the most able barristers from ethnic minorities could advance and overcome prejudice as well as better represent members of an increasingly diverse society.<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/letters/article1007444.ece | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110629122200/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/letters/article1007444.ece | url-status = dead | archive-date = 29 June 2011 | title = Barristers from ethnic minorities | access-date  = 17 February 2009 | author = Courtenay Griffiths |author2=Linda Dobbs |author3=Oba Nsugbe  | date = 3 November 2003 | department = Letters to the Editor | work = The Times| quote = The hopes of a rising cohort of black and Asian practitioners would be dashed at a stroke by the abolition of silk, and a huge opportunity to promote diversity in the legal profession and on the bench would be missed. }}</ref>

The government's focus switched from abolition to reform and, in particular, reform of the much-criticised "secret soundings" of judges and other establishment legal figures upon which the old system was based. This was held to be inappropriate and unfair given the size of the modern profession, as well as a possible source of improper government patronage (since the final recommendations were made by the Lord Chancellor, who is a member of the government), and discriminatory against part-time workers, women, and ethnic minorities.{{citation needed|date=April 2024}}

In November 2004, after much public debate in favour of and against retaining the title,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/qcfuture/responses/qc332.pdf|title=Constitutional reform: the future of Queen's Counsel.|publisher=[[Lord Chancellor|The Lord Chancellor]], [[Department for Constitutional Affairs]]|page=9|access-date=30 January 2009}}</ref> the government announced that appointments of Queen's Counsel in England would be resumed but that future appointees would be chosen not by the government but by a nine-member panel, the [[King's Counsel Selection Panel|Queen's Counsel Selection Panel]],<ref name="qcpanel">{{cite web |title=The Selection Panel |url=https://qcappointments.org/the-selection-panel/ |website=Queen's Counsel Appointments |access-date=9 December 2021}}</ref> chaired by a lay person, to include two barristers, two solicitors, one retired judge, and three non-lawyers. Formally, the appointment remains a royal one made on the advice of the [[Lord Chancellor]], but without comment on individual applications. The Lord Chancellor supervises the process and reviews the panel's recommendations in general terms (to be satisfied that the process as operated is fair and efficient).

Application forms under the new system were released in July 2005 and the appointment of 175 new Queen's Counsel was announced on 20 July 2006. A total of 443 people had applied (including 68 women, 24 ethnic minority lawyers, and 12 solicitors). Of the 175 appointed, 33 were women, 10 were ethnic minorities, and four were solicitors. Six people were also appointed QC ''honoris causa''.<ref name="MoJ_Aug07">{{cite web|publisher=Ministry of Justice |url=http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/announcement_130807a.htm |title=Honorary QC nominations |work=Announcements 2007 |quote=The six appointees in 2006 were... |date=13 August 2007 |access-date=29 January 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081121043736/http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/announcement_130807a.htm |archive-date=21 November 2008 }}</ref>

===Northern Ireland===

The title of QC continued to be used under the rule of Queen Elizabeth II. In 1998 two Northern Ireland barristers ([[Seamus Treacy]] and Barry Macdonald) opposed the requirement of swearing an oath of allegiance to the Crown. The Bar Council, the body which represents barristers' interests, had agreed, in the ''Elliott Report'', that the royal oath should be dropped and replaced by a more neutral statement. It suggested that, instead of declaring services to Queen Elizabeth, barristers should "sincerely promise and declare that I will well and truly serve all whom I may lawfully be called to serve in the office of one of Her Majesty's Counsel, learned in the law according to the best of my skill and understanding".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.birw.org/rep2000/augsept2000.html |title=Director's Report, August/September 2000 |last=Winter |first=Jane |date=30 September 2000 |publisher=British Irish Rights Watch |access-date=30 January 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081221132019/http://www.birw.org/rep2000/augsept2000.html |archive-date=21 December 2008 }}</ref>{{Dubious|Northern Ireland|date=January 2009}}

In 1997, the [[Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland|Lord Chief Justice]], [[Robert Carswell, Baron Carswell|Sir Robert Carswell]], wrote "I have little doubt myself that this is all part of an ongoing {{Sic|hide=y|politically|-}}based campaign to have the office of Queen's Counsel replaced by a rank entitled Senior Counsel, or something to that effect".<ref>{{cite web |date=February 2000 |title=Additional Submission to the Criminal Justice Review |url=http://www.caj.org.uk/keydocs/AddRevCJR.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081222005314/http://www.caj.org.uk/keydocs/AddRevCJR.html |archive-date=22 December 2008 |access-date=30 January 2009 |publisher=[[Committee on the Administration of Justice]]}}</ref>

In 2000, the [[Northern Ireland High Court]] ruled in the barristers' favour. After more wrangling, the barristers were permitted to make "a more neutral statement" of commitment to principles.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.opsi.gov.uk/Acts/acts2002/en/ukpgaen_20020026_en_1|title=Explanatory Notes to Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002|date=16 October 2002|publisher=[[Office of Public Sector Information]]|access-date=30 January 2009}}</ref>{{Dubious|Northern Ireland|date=January 2009}}

===Scotland===

The independent bar is organised as the [[Faculty of Advocates]] and its members are known not as barristers but as advocates. The position of Queen's Counsel was not recognised before 1868. The Scottish bar did have a concept of senior counsel before the introduction of the formal rank of Queen's Counsel. An advocate would self-declare that they were 'giving up writing', meaning that they would no longer draft pleadings and move onto a supervisory role in litigation. In practice this meant that the practitioner would review and revise the written pleadings of their junior.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Shiels |first1=Robert S |title=Queen's Counsel in Scotland |journal=Scots Law Times |date=2007 |volume=2007 |issue=18 |page=121}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Shiels |first1=Robert S |title=The introduction of silk into Scotland |journal=Scots Law Times |date=2017 |volume=2017 |issue=20 |page=99}}</ref>

Initially the status of QC was reserved first for law officers ([[Lord Advocate]] and [[Solicitor General for Scotland]]) and soon after for the Dean of the Faculty of Advocates. In 1897, a petition by the Faculty of Advocates for the establishment of a Scottish roll of Queen's Counsel was approved, and the names of the first appointees were published in the Edinburgh Gazette on 3 September 1897.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Shiels |first1=Robert S |title=The introduction of silk into Scotland |journal=Scots Law Times |date=2017 |volume=2017 |issue=20 |page=102}}</ref> By decision of [[James Robertson, Baron Robertson|Lord President Robertson]], these first Scottish Queen's Counsel were not required to make a declaration not to act against the Crown, and so Scottish King's Counsel have never been required to obtain a licence to plead in order to do so.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Shiels |first1=Robert S |title=The introduction of silk into Scotland |journal=Scots Law Times |date=2017 |volume=2017 |issue=20 |page=101}}</ref>

In 2005, there were more than 150 QCs in Scotland.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.scotland.gov.uk/News/Releases/2005/06/16100924 |title=Appointment of Queen's Counsel |publisher=Scotland.gov.uk |date=16 June 2005 |access-date=19 January 2012}}</ref> The appointment of King's Counsel is made on the recommendation of the [[Lord President of the Court of Session|Lord Justice General]] to the [[First Minister of Scotland]], formerly the [[Secretary of State for Scotland]]. In the 1990s, rules were changed so that solicitors with rights of audience in the [[Court of Session]] or High Court of Justiciary were permitted to apply for appointment, and two or three have done so. A solicitor advocate who is so appointed is designated as ''King's Counsel, Solicitor Advocate''.

===<span class="anchor" id="King's Counsel (''honoris causa'')">''Honoris causa''</span>===

An award of King's Counsel ''honoris causa'' (honorary KC) may be made to lawyers who have made a major contribution to the law of England and Wales but who operate outside court practice.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/queens-counsel-in-england-and-wales-2013 |title=Announcement: Queens Counsel in England and Wales 2013  |author=[[Ministry of Justice (United Kingdom)|Ministry of Justice]] |date=27 February 2013 |publisher=[[Gov.uk|GOV.UK]] |access-date=29 June 2014}}</ref><ref name="sixthformlaw1">{{cite web |url=http://sixthformlaw.info/01_modules/mod1/1_4_legal_personnel/1_4_2_barristers_solicitors/16_queen_counsel.htm |title=Barristers and solicitors – Queen's Counsel |last1=Souper |first1=M |publisher=Sixth Form Law |access-date=29 June 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131102095315/http://sixthformlaw.info/01_modules/mod1/1_4_legal_personnel/1_4_2_barristers_solicitors/16_queen_counsel.htm |archive-date=2 November 2013 |url-status=usurped}}</ref>

=== <span class="anchor" id="Courtesy QC for Members of Parliament">Courtesy appointments for Members of Parliament</span>===

Until the 1990s there was a practice that sitting members of the UK Parliament (MPs) who were barristers were appointed QC, if they wished, on reaching a certain level of seniority of around fifteen years at the bar. Such appointments were sometimes known as "courtesy" or even "false" silk, and also as "nylons". In the 1990s, it was felt that the practice of granting silk to MPs in this way, without considering their abilities, devalued the rank and the practice was abolished.<ref name="sixthformlaw1"/>{{Better source needed|date=April 2021}}

However, for now the practice persists for law officers of the Crown.<ref name=Sixth>{{Cite web|url=http://sixthformlaw.info/01_modules/mod1/1_4_legal_personnel/1_4_2_barristers_solicitors/16_queen_counsel.htm|title=Barristers and solicitors – Queen's Counsel|publisher=6 Form Law|access-date=6 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170623053523/http://sixthformlaw.info/01_modules/mod1/1_4_legal_personnel/1_4_2_barristers_solicitors/16_queen_counsel.htm|archive-date=23 June 2017|url-status=usurped}}</ref> Former [[Attorney General for England and Wales]] [[Jeremy Wright]] was not a QC when he was appointed, a subject which attracted some comment.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://venerablepuzzle.wordpress.com/2014/07/16/does-it-matter-that-camerons-new-attorney-general-isnt-a-qc/|title=Does It Matter That Cameron's New Attorney General Isn't a QC?|date=16 July 2014|access-date=25 January 2017}}</ref> Despite not having practised law for some time, Wright took silk shortly after his appointment, which was criticised by some as a breach of the protocol against "courtesy silk".<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://counselofperfection.blogspot.com/2014/07/judge-man-by-his-actions-not-his.html|title=Judge a man by his actions not his website – Reflection on the Attorney General|author=Maximilian Hardy|date=17 July 2014|access-date=25 January 2017|quote=I do not believe it to be right that with the now well established mechanism in place for Queen's Counsel Appointments that the Law Officers should be awarded Silk as a courtesy title.}}</ref> Similarly when [[Harriet Harman]] was appointed as [[Solicitor General for England and Wales|Solicitor General]] she was made a QC. [[Suella Braverman]] took silk on 25 February 2020; earlier that month she had, like Wright, been appointed Attorney General.

===Death of Queen Elizabeth II===

Upon the [[death of Queen Elizabeth II]] and the succession of [[King Charles III]], the [[General Council of the Bar]] wrote that all QC titles changed to KC "with immediate effect".<ref>{{cite tweet |title=We have been advised by the Crown Office that the title Queen's Counsel (QC) changes to King's Counsel (KC) with immediate effect. The change is automatic so there are no new Letters Patent. |user=thebarcouncil | number=1567941550289592329 |author=Bar Council |access-date=8 September 2022 |language=en}}</ref> This was not a matter of decision by the Bar Council, nor by the Crown Office. It is the automatic effect of the [[Demise of the Crown Act 1901]], s 1.<ref>{{Cite legislation UK| type=act | year=1901 |chapter=5 | act = Demise of the Crown Act 1901 | section = 1 | date = 2 July 1901 | access-date = 13 September 2022 | quote=The holding of any office under the Crown, whether within or without His Majesty's dominions, shall not be affected, nor shall any fresh appointment thereto be rendered necessary, by the demise of the Crown.}}</ref>

==Countries that retain the designation==

{{More citations needed|section|date=July 2021}}
King's Counsel are retained in several [[Commonwealth realm]]s where [[Charles III]] is [[head of state]].

===Australia===

Appointments in the [[Commonwealth of Australia]] are made at both a federal and state level. The selection process varies from state to state. In [[New South Wales]], for example, the process involves a committee made up of senior members of the State's bar, and usually a non-practising former barrister such as a retired judge. The committee then consults with judges, peers, and law firms on the applicant's suitability for the position. The selection committee deliberates in private, and reasons for the decisions are not published.

From 1993, the [[Australian Government|Commonwealth]] and most [[States and territories of Australia|state and territory]] governments began to replace the title of Queen's Counsel and appointment by [[letters patent]] with the title [[Senior Counsel]] as an honorific conferred by the legal profession, a trend that would reverse in the 2010s. There is no difference in status between a King's Counsel and a Senior Counsel.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=June 2011 |title=Court Structure, Judges' Titles and Order of Seniority |url=http://www.nswbar.asn.au/docs/professional/prof_dev/BPC/course_files/Court%20Strcture%20Protocol.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.nswbar.asn.au/docs/professional/prof_dev/BPC/course_files/Court%20Strcture%20Protocol.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |publisher=New South Wales Bar Association}}</ref>

The first states to change to the title of Senior Counsel were New South Wales in 1993<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nswbar.asn.au/docs/professional/silks/Silk_practical.pdf|title=Appointment of Silk in New South Wales|year=1993|publisher=Bar Association of New South Wales|access-date=19 March 2011|work=Senior Counsel Protocol|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110313054720/http://www.nswbar.asn.au//docs/professional/silks/Silk_practical.pdf|archive-date=13 March 2011}}</ref> and [[Queensland]] in 1994.<ref name="qcr">{{cite web |url=http://statements.qld.gov.au/Statement/2012/12/12/queens-counsels-return-to-queensland |title=Queen's Counsels return to Queensland |first=Jarrod |last=Bleijie |date=12 December 2012 |work=Media Statements |publisher=Department of the Premier and Cabinet |access-date=11 July 2013 |archive-date=2 November 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131102000135/http://statements.qld.gov.au/Statement/2012/12/12/queens-counsels-return-to-queensland |url-status=dead }}</ref> Most other states and the Commonwealth Government followed over the next 15 years, including the ACT in 1995,<ref name="ACT-24-09-2001">{{cite web |url= http://www.courts.act.gov.au/supreme/content/PracticeDirectionsNotesToPractitioners/Practice%20Direction%202%20of%2094.pdf |title= Moratorium on appointment of Queen's Counsel – Practice Direction 2/94 (Further amended 1995) |date=12 September 1995 |publisher=[[Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory]] |access-date=3 October 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url= http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20090520142151/http://www.courts.act.gov.au/supreme/content/PracticeDirectionsNotesToPractitioners/Practice%20Direction%202%20of%2094.pdf |archive-date=20 May 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/government-calls-its-news-silks-senior-counsel-not-queens-counsel/story-e6frg97x-1225889557607 |title= Government calls its new silks senior counsel, not Queen's counsel |date= 9 July 2010 |access-date= 7 February 2011 |work= The Australian |location= Sydney |url-status= dead |archive-date= 17 March 2014 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140317190126/http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/government-calls-its-news-silks-senior-counsel-not-queens-counsel/story-e6frg97x-1225889557607 }}</ref> [[Victoria (state)|Victoria]] in 2000,<ref name="Age-17Dec09">{{cite news |url= http://www.theage.com.au/national/victorian-courts-banish-outdated-queen-20091216-kxhk.html |title=Victorian courts banish 'outdated' Queen |last=Austin |first=Paul |date=17 December 2009 |work=The Age |location= Melbourne |access-date=18 December 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20091218014020/http://www.theage.com.au/national/victorian-courts-banish-outdated-queen-20091216-kxhk.html |archive-date=18 December 2009}}</ref><ref name="SCV-12September2007">{{cite press release |url= http://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/Supreme+Court/resources/file/ebfcb5464bb700c/MediaRelease_Appointment_process_Senior_Council07.pdf |title= Appointment of Senior Counsel |date=12 September 2007 |publisher=[[Supreme Court of Victoria]] |access-date=2 October 2008 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080722111805/http://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/Supreme%2BCourt/resources/file/ebfcb5464bb700c/MediaRelease_Appointment_process_Senior_Council07.pdf |archive-date=22 July 2008 |url-status=dead }}</ref> [[Western Australia]] in 2001,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.supremecourt.wa.gov.au/content/news/media/2001/media22.aspx|title=24 September 2001 Senior Counsel to replace Queen's Counsel in WA|date=24 November 2001|publisher=[[Supreme Court of Western Australia]]|access-date=2 October 2008}}</ref> [[Tasmania]] in 2005,<ref name="norepublic.com.au">{{Cite web |url= http://www.norepublic.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4636&Itemid=4 |title=The rustle of silk: a restoration play for the 21st Century? |website=No Republic! Australians for Constitutional Monarchy |access-date=2016-08-17}}</ref> and South Australia in 2008.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/silks-to-lose-qc-title/story-e6frea83-1111116206799 |title=Queens Counsel title to be abolished in SA |last=Kelton |first=Greg |date=29 April 2008 |work=The Advertiser |location=Adelaide |access-date=5 January 2013 |archive-date=10 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131210025455/http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/silks-to-lose-qc-title/story-e6frea83-1111116206799 |url-status=dead }}</ref> In the [[Northern Territory]], the rank of King's Counsel was never formally abolished, but in 2007 the rules of the Territory's Supreme Court were amended to facilitate the appointment of Senior Counsel by the Chief Justice.<ref name="norepublic.com.au" /> Those appointed QC before the change in each jurisdiction were permitted to retain the old title.

In the 2010s, some states moved to revert to the old title of Queen's Counsel. In 2013, Queensland restored the rank of Queen's Counsel.<ref>{{cite news|last=Tlozek|first=Eric|title=Queen's Counsel title restored in Qld|url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-12-12/queens-counsel-title-restored-in-qld/4423854|access-date=31 December 2012|work=ABC News|date=12 December 2012}}</ref> Those appointed Senior Counsel before the reintroduction of Queen's Counsel were given the option of retaining their old title or seeking appointment as Queen's Counsel, while all new appointments would be as Queen's Counsel only. Of the 74 Senior Counsel appointed in Queensland before the reintroduction of Queen's Counsel in June 2013, only four opted to retain their title of Senior Counsel.<ref name="sdor">{{cite web|url=http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/states-divide-over-restoration-of-queens-counsel-title/story-e6frg97x-1226663452676|title=States divide over restoration of 'Queen's Counsel' title|work=The Australian}}</ref> In 2014, Victoria also restored the rank of Queen's Counsel,<ref name="vicbar.com.au">[http://www.vicbar.com.au/GetFile.ashx?file=MembersFiles/140203+Clark+-+Victoria+to+give+senior+barristers+option+to+become+QCs+_(media+release).pdf Victoria to give senior barristers option to become QCs]{{dead link|date=July 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> by way of making new appointments first as Senior Counsel, but then giving the option to seek appointment as Queen's Counsel by letters patent.<ref name="vicbar.com.au"/> In 2019, the [[South Australian]] Government announced it was also going to reinstate the title of Queen's Counsel, and most eligible took the opportunity.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://sabar.org.au/barrister-search/#!directory/map/ord=lnm/lbl=&5bc1629cf033bf081e15826b |title=Barrister Search |publisher=South Australia Bar Association |access-date=1 September 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://indaily.com.au/news/2019/02/18/govt-to-reinstate-qcs-spurning-supreme-court-judges/ |title=Govt to reinstate QCs, spurning Supreme Court judges |work=InDaily |last=Siebert |first=Bension |date=18 February 2019 |access-date=1 September 2021}}</ref> In 2024 a new SA government reversed this decision.

The Commonwealth appointed Queen's Counsel until March 2007. On 8 July 2010, [[Gillard government]] Attorney-General [[Robert McClelland (Australian politician)|Robert McClelland]] appointed the first Commonwealth "Senior Counsel".<ref name="norepublic.com.au" /> In March 2014, Attorney-General [[George Brandis]] QC announced that the Commonwealth would revert to using the title of Queen's Counsel for new appointments and would give all existing Commonwealth Senior Counsel the option of changing their post-nominal to QC.

With the death of Queen Elizabeth II, the [[Australian Bar Association]] confirmed that all extant Queen's Counsel had become King's Counsel automatically.<ref>{{cite web |last=Doraisamy |first=Jerome |title=Queens Counsel to become Kings Counsel |url=https://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/wig-chamber/35475-queens-counsel-to-become-kings-counsel |website=Lawyers Weekly |access-date=8 September 2022 |date=8 September 2022}}</ref>

When taking judicial office in a superior court, a barrister loses the title of King's Counsel and only regains it if new letters patent are issued after the person leaves office.<ref name=":1">Justice P. D. Cummins, 'Reflections on Judicial Office', paper presented on 1 September 2009, 11.</ref><ref>J. D. Merralls, "Reversion is Impossible", ''Victorian Bar News'', Vol. 89 (Winter, 1994), 53.</ref> Conversely, since the appointment of Senior Counsel is not by letters patent, when a Senior Counsel takes office, there is no doctrinal reason why the title of Senior Counsel is lost.<ref name=":1" /> However, this is customarily not done, and the New South Wales Bar Association instructs that "KC" and "SC" postnominals should not be used for superior court judges.<ref name=":0" />

==== Summary of Australian jurisdictions ====

{| class="wikitable"
!Jurisdiction
!Appointments
!Notes
|-
|[[New South Wales]]
|SC
|Appointed QC from 1856 to 1993. Appointed only SC since 1993.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Senior Counsel |url=https://nswbar.asn.au/the-bar-association/senior-counsel |access-date=2024-06-17 |website=[[New South Wales Bar Association]]}}</ref>
|-
|[[Victoria (state)|Victoria]]
|KC and SC
|Appointed QC from 1863 to 2000.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Merralls |first=J D |date=1994 |title=Some Marginal Notes About Queen's Counsel |journal=Victorian Bar News |volume=89 |pages=51–55}}</ref> Appointed only SC from 2000 to 2014. Since 2014, SC may become a QC on application.
|-
|[[Queensland]]
|KC
|Appointed QC from 1856 to 1994.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hobbs |first=Harry |author-link=Harry Hobbs |date=24 Apr 2014 |title=Putting the Queen back in Queensland |url=https://ssrn.com/abstract=2428610 |journal=Alternative Law Journal |volume=39 |issue=1|pages=9–11 |doi=10.1177/1037969X1403900103 |hdl=10453/130447 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> Appointed only SC from 1994 to 2013. Appointed only QC since 2013.<ref>{{Cite web |title=King's Counsel & Senior Counsel |url=https://qldbar.asn.au/baq-cms/kings-counsel |access-date=2024-06-17 |website=Bar Association of Queensland}}</ref>
|-
|[[Western Australia]]
|SC
|Appointed only SC since 2001.
|-
|[[South Australia]]
|SC
|Appointed QC from 1864 to 2008.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Court History |url=https://www.courts.sa.gov.au/court-history/ |access-date=2024-06-17 |website=Courts Administration Authority of South Australia}}</ref> Appointed only SC from 2008 to 2020. Between 2020 and 2024, SC could become a QC on application.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Chapman |first=Jemma |date=28 Sep 2020 |title=SA legal industry welcomes return of QC title |url=https://www.indaily.com.au/news/local/2020/09/28/sa-legal-industry-welcomes-return-of-qc-title |work=InDaily}}</ref> Since 2024, reverted to only appointing SC.<ref>{{Cite news |date=16 June 2024 |title=KCs band: that's the way they don't like it |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/3068467222 |url-access=subscription |work=The Advertiser |id={{ProQuest|3068467222}} }}</ref>
|-
|[[Tasmania]]
|SC
|Appointed only SC since 2001.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Blow |first=Justice A M |date=15 April 2015 |title=Ceremonial Sitting: 2015 |url=https://www.supremecourt.tas.gov.au/publications/speeches-articles/ceremonial-sitting-2015/ |access-date= |website=[[Supreme Court of Tasmania]] |language=en-AU}}</ref>
|-
|[[Australian Capital Territory]]
|SC
|Appointed only SC since 1995.<ref>{{Cite web |date=12 Sep 1995 |title=Practice Direction No 2 of 1994: Further Amended 12 September 1995: Queen's Counsel – Senior Counsel |url=https://www.courts.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/969470/practice_direction_2_of_94.pdf |website=Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory}}</ref>
|-
|[[Northern Territory]]
|KC and SC
|Appointed both QC and SC since 2007.
|-
|Commonwealth
|KC
|Appointed only SC from 2010 to 2013. Appointed only QC since 2013.
|}

===Canada===

{{See also|Category:Canadian King's Counsel}}

====<span class="anchor" id="Constitutional authority to appoint King's Counsel">Constitutional authority for appointments</span>====

In Canada, both the federal government and the provincial governments have the constitutional authority to appoint a lawyer as King's Counsel.<ref name="bailii.org">[http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/1897/1897_49.html ''Attorney General for the Dominion of Canada v Attorney General for the Province of Ontario''], [1897] UKPC 49, [1898] AC 247.</ref>

During the reign of a queen, the title is properly "Her Majesty's Counsel learned in the law"<ref>For example, the ''Legal Profession Act'' (Nova Scotia), s. 78(1) and ''The Queen's Counsel Act'' (Saskatchewan), s. 2</ref> but normally referred to as "Queen's Counsel" and abbreviated "Q.C." in English or "c.r." in French ({{lang|fr|conseiller de la reine}} or {{lang|fr|conseillère de la reine}} for a female counsel). During the reign of a king, the title is "King's Counsel" or "K.C." in English, but continues to be "c.r." in French ({{lang|fr|conseillier du roi}} or {{lang|fr|conseillière du roi}}).

====Criticisms and reforms====

Lawyers continue to be appointed King's Counsel by the federal government and by nine of the ten [[Provinces and territories of Canada|Canadian provinces]]. The award has been criticised in the past on the basis that appointment as King's Counsel depended largely on political affiliation.<ref name="ManQC">{{cite web|url=https://www.gov.mb.ca/chc/press/top/2001/01/2001-01-09-01.html|title=Manitoba Government News Release: Queen's Counsel Appointments Replaced To Reflect Modern Times: Mackintosh – New 'Senior Counsel' Designation by Law Society To Recognize Excellence in the Legal Profession|date=9 January 2001|access-date=19 January 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111027024736/http://www.gov.mb.ca/chc/press/top/2001/01/2001-01-09-01.html|archive-date=27 October 2011}}</ref> However, in those provinces which continue to appoint lawyers as King's Counsel reforms have been made to de-politicise the award. Candidates are increasingly screened by committees composed of representatives of the bench and the bar, who give advice to the relevant Attorney General on appointments. The reforms have been designed to make the award a recognition of merit by individual members of the bar, often coupled with community service.

====Appointments by jurisdiction====

=====Federal government=====

The federal government stopped appointing Queen's Counsel in 1993, but resumed the practice in 2013 under the [[Harper Ministry]].<ref name="Gov.ca 20131211">{{Cite web |url=http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/news-nouv/nr-cp/2013/doc_33009.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131220194656/http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/news-nouv/nr-cp/2013/doc_33009.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=20 December 2013 |title=Justice Canada: Designation of Queen's Counsel |date=11 December 2013 |access-date=13 December 2013}}</ref> Appointments are recommended by the Minister of Justice, assisted by an advisory committee. In 2014, the government appointed seven lawyers as Queen's Counsel. All were employed in the federal public service.<ref>"[http://news.gc.ca/web/article-en.do?nid=913609 Justice Canada:  Designation of Queen's Counsel]", 11 December 2014. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151231171201/http://news.gc.ca/web/article-en.do?nid=913609 |date=31 December 2015 }}</ref>

Since 2015, under the [[29th Canadian Ministry|Trudeau Ministry]], federal appointments as a Queen's Counsel (or King's Counsel since 8 September 2022) has been limited to the [[Attorney General of Canada]]. [[Jody Wilson-Raybould]] was appointed as Queen's Counsel when she served as Attorney General and [[David Lametti]] was appointed a Queen's Counsel on 15 April 2019.<ref>"[http://orders-in-council.canada.ca/attachment.php?attach=37696&lang=en Order in council PC 2019-0375]", 15 April 2019.</ref>

=====Alberta=====

The [[Executive Council of Alberta|provincial Cabinet]] appoints lawyers, of at least 10 years' standing, as King's Counsel.<ref>[http://www.qp.alberta.ca/documents/Acts/Q01.pdf ''Queen's Counsel Act''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150927010442/http://www.qp.alberta.ca/documents/Acts/Q01.pdf |date=27 September 2015 }}, RSA 2000, c Q-1, ss 1, 2.</ref> Traditionally, the appointments are made every second year, but no appointments were made between 2016 and 2020. The nomination process resumed in 2019. Applications are reviewed by a screening committee of members of the judiciary and the legal community, which submitted recommendations for appointment to the Minister of Justice and Solicitor General and Cabinet for consideration, who in turn recommends names to Cabinet.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://documents.lawsociety.ab.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/signed-letter-to-the-profession-august-2019.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://documents.lawsociety.ab.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/signed-letter-to-the-profession-august-2019.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |title=Letter from Doug Schweitzer, Minister of Justice and Solicitor General, to the Law Society of Alberta |publisher=Law Society of Alberta |date=1 August 2019 |access-date=1 September 2021 |url-status=live}}</ref> In 2020, the province designated over 130 lawyers as Queen's Counsel,<ref>[https://www.qp.alberta.ca/documents/Orders/Orders_in_Council/2020/2020_061.html Alberta Order-in-Council 61/2020, 4 March 2020.]</ref> and another round of appointees in February 2022.

=====British Columbia=====

{{See also|List of King's Counsel Appointments in British Columbia}}

King's Counsel are appointed by the provincial Cabinet on the advice of the [[Attorney General of British Columbia]]. No more than 7% of the bar of British Columbia can be awarded the designation. Before making the recommendation to Cabinet, the Attorney General is required by statute to consult with the [[British Columbia Court of Appeal|Chief Justice of British Columbia]], the Chief Justice of the [[Supreme Court of British Columbia]], and two lawyers appointed by the [[Law Society of British Columbia]]. A recipient must have at least five years' standing at the bar of British Columbia.<ref name = BCQC>[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/laws/stat/rsbc-1996-c-393/latest/rsbc-1996-c-393.html ''Queen's Counsel Act''], RSBC 1996, c 393.</ref>

In practice, the Attorney General appoints an advisory committee which includes these officials and also the Chief Judge of the [[Provincial Court of British Columbia|Provincial Court]], the president of the British Columbia Branch of the [[Canadian Bar Association]] and the [[Deputy Attorney General|deputy attorney general]]. Candidates must be acknowledged by their peers as leading counsel, have demonstrated exceptional qualities of leadership in the profession, or have done outstanding work in legal scholarship.<ref name = "BC 2020">[https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/justice/for-legal-professionals/queens-counsel British Columbia:  Queen's Counsel Nomination Process.]</ref>

In 2020, the province designated twenty-six lawyers as Queen's Counsel, from a group of 136 nominees.<ref>[https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2020AG0078-002114 British Columbia News Release (22 December 2020):  "26 lawyers appointed as Queen's counsel."]</ref>

The [[Attorney General of British Columbia]] is automatically appointed as King's Counsel on taking office.<ref name = BCQC/>

=====Manitoba=====

The government of Manitoba stopped appointing Queen's Counsel in 2001. Existing designations had remained in effect.<ref>"[http://www.mhs.mb.ca/docs/people/counsel.shtml Manitoba Queen's Counsels / King's Counsels]". Manitoba Historical Society.</ref> In 2019, Manitoba re-instituted the Queen's Counsel designation.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.gov.mb.ca/justice/crown/queencounsel/index.html |title=Manitoba Justice: Queen's Counsel. |access-date=1 October 2019 |archive-date=1 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191001001335/https://www.gov.mb.ca/justice/crown/queencounsel/index.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> Appointments are made by the [[Law Society of Manitoba]].<ref name="ManQC" />

=====New Brunswick=====

The Lieutenant Governor appoints King's Counsel on the advice of a committee comprising the [[Chief Justice of New Brunswick]], the [[Attorney General of New Brunswick]], and the president of the [[Law Society of New Brunswick]]. The committee's recommendation must be unanimous.<ref>''Queen's Counsel and Precedence Act'', SNB 2012, c 113, s 2.</ref> Recipients must have 15 years of active practice of the law in New Brunswick, with extensive experience before the courts, or demonstrate exceptional service to the profession. The [[Deputy Attorney General]] of New Brunswick and deans of New Brunswick law schools may also be appointed. The number recommended for appointment shall not exceed 1% of the members of the bar in New Brunswick who are not already designated, and the Lieutenant Governor shall only make appointments once per year.<ref>[https://releve.canlii.org/en/nb/laws/regu/nb-reg-84-270/latest/nb-reg-84-270.html ''Queen's Counsel Regulation''], NB Reg 84-270, ss 3, 4, 6 and 7.{{dead link|date=July 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> In 2016, the province designated eleven lawyers as Queen's Counsel.<ref>{{cite press release |url=http://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/news/news_release.2016.10.1013.html |title=2016 Queen's counsel appointments named |publisher=Government of New Brunswick |date=21 October 2016}}</ref>

=====Newfoundland and Labrador=====

The Lieutenant Governor in Council appoints King's Counsel, on the recommendation of the Minister of Justice. The Minister is required to consult with the Legal Appointments Board, which consists of five individuals appointed by the Minister: two are from a list recommended by the [[Law Society of Newfoundland and Labrador]], one is to be a lawyer from outside the metropolitan area of St John's, one is to be a bencher, and one is to be a lawyer with less than ten years at the bar.<ref>[http://www.assembly.nl.ca/legislation/sr/statutes/q02.htm ''Queen's Counsel Act''], RSNL1990, c Q-2, ss 3 and 7.</ref> The appointments process has been criticised in the past as lacking transparency and being too open to political appointments.<ref>"[http://bondpapers.blogspot.ca/2006/03/rumpole-and-old-boy-net-newfoundland.html Rumpole and the Old Boy Net, Newfoundland and Labrador version]"</ref> In 2017, the government appointed eleven lawyers as Queen's Counsel.<ref>"[http://www.releases.gov.nl.ca/releases/2017/exec/0113n02.aspx Local Lawyers Recognized for Achievements]". Government of Newfoundland and Labrador (press release), 13 January 2017.</ref>

=====Nova Scotia=====

The Lieutenant Governor appoints King's Counsel on the advice of the provincial Cabinet. Recipients must have at least 15 years as a member of the bar of Nova Scotia.<ref>[http://nslegislature.ca/legc/statutes/legalpro.htm ''Legal Profession Act''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201191600/http://nslegislature.ca/legc/statutes/legalpro.htm |date=1 December 2017 }}, SNS 2004, c 28, s 78.</ref> The Minister of Justice is advised by an independent advisory committee, through the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society.<ref name="Nova Scotia 2017">"[https://novascotia.ca/news/release/?id=20170223001 Nova Scotia Lawyers Receive Prestigious Designation]", 23 February 2017.</ref> Eligible candidates can apply, or they can be nominated by others. Applications generally open in September of each year, with appointments made annually.<ref>"[http://nsbs.org/queens-counsel-process Queen's Counsel Process] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140630205028/http://nsbs.org/queens-counsel-process |date=30 June 2014 }}". Nova Scotia Barristers' Society.</ref>

According to the criteria published by the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society on the nomination form, candidates must demonstrate professional integrity, good character and outstanding contributions to the practice of law through recognition by other members of the profession as an exceptional barrister or solicitor, exceptional contributions through legal scholarship, teaching or continuing legal education, demonstration of exceptional qualities of leadership in the profession, and engaging in activities of a public or charitable nature in such a way as to raise the esteem in which the legal profession is held by the public.<ref name = "nsbs">{{Cite web |url=http://nsbs.org/sites/default/files/cms/forms/QCinformationform.pdf |title=Information Form: Queen's Counsel Appointments |access-date=8 April 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160314122619/http://nsbs.org/sites/default/files/cms/forms/QCinformationform.pdf |archive-date=14 March 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref> The Nova Scotia Barristers' Society also indicates that the committee is asked to consider regional, gender and minority representations among the persons recommended for appointment.<ref name = "nsbs"/> In 2017, the government appointed 14 lawyers as Queen's Counsel.<ref name = "Nova Scotia 2017" />

=====Ontario=====

From 1985 to 2022, the Government of [[Ontario]] stopped making appointments. In 1985, then-Premier of Ontario [[David Peterson]] made a statement in the house giving five reasons:
# the designation was originally meant to recognise excellence in the courtroom, but the practice in Ontario was that it could be given to any lawyer, regardless of courtroom experience;
# the use of the designation misled the public, because it was more based on who one knows than what one knows;
# it was unfair to lawyers who for whatever reason have not been designated, leading to questions about their standing in the profession;
# no other profession received government awards of this type; and
# the designation had been used in Ontario mainly as a form of political patronage.<ref>{{cite web|title=Ontario Legislative Assembly, Official Records for 10 December 1985|url=http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/house-proceedings/house_detail.do?locale=en&Sess=1&Parl=33&Date=1985-12-10#P40_8240|work=HANSARD|access-date=16 December 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131216190426/http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/house-proceedings/house_detail.do?locale=en&Sess=1&Parl=33&Date=1985-12-10#P40_8240|archive-date=16 December 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref>

In his statement, Premier Peterson stated that the government would stop awarding the designation and would move to revoke existing designations. Although the government did stop awarding the designation, it did not formally abolish it. Lawyers appointed as Queen's Counsel prior to 1985 continued to use the QC (KC) or cr [[List of post-nominal letters in Canada|postnominal letters]].<ref name="Slaw 20120103">{{Cite web | url=http://www.slaw.ca/2012/01/03/queens-counsel-appointments/ |title=Queen's Counsel Appointments |last=Mirreau |first=Shaunna |publisher=Slaw |date=3 January 2012 |access-date=13 December 2013}}</ref> In response to the government's decision, the [[Law Society of Upper Canada]], the governing body for Ontario lawyers, implemented the [[Law Society Medal]] in 1985 to recognise excellence in the profession. Recipients are entitled to use "LSM" behind their names.<ref>"[http://www.lsuc.on.ca/law-society-medal/ The Law Society Medal]". Law Society of Upper Canada, December 2015.</ref>

Lawyers who are designated Certified Specialist are recognized and experienced in their field of law and have met high standards imposed by the Law Society of Ontario.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://lso.ca/lawyers/about-your-licence/manage-your-licence/certified-specialists|title=Certified Specialists – About the Certified Specialist Program|website=Law Society of Ontario}}</ref> This is commonly identified as modern day replacement to the Queen's Counsel (QC) designation.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Alnaji|first=Yassir|title=Bill 203: The Legal Profession Amendment Act (Queen's Counsel Appointments)|journal=Manitoba Law Journal|date=2018 |volume=41|issue=1|pages=461|doi=10.29173/mlj1080 }}</ref>

Ontario courts continued to recognize the Queen's Counsel designations of Ontario lawyers appearing before it where those lawyers were accorded the honorific by the Federal Government.<ref>See, for example, Croft Michaelson, Q.C., an Ontario lawyer employed by the federal government and [http://www.ontariocourts.ca/decisions/2016/2016ONCA0582.htm so appointed in 2014].</ref>

On 30 June 2023, the Attorney General for Ontario reinstituted the practice of appointing King's Counsel, in honour of the [[coronation of Charles III]].<ref>[https://news.ontario.ca/en/bulletin/1003229/ontario-reinstitutes-kings-counsel-designation Ontario Newsroom:  BULLETIN:  "Ontario Reinstitutes King's Counsel Designation", 30 June 2023.]</ref> Until the designation's reinstitution in 2023, there were calls from some members of the Ontario bar for the province to reinstate the King's Counsel designation, on a merit basis, to help Ontario lawyers remain competitive internationally.<ref>[https://www.lawtimesnews.com/practice-areas/litigation/veteran-litigator-calls-for-ontario-to-reinstitute-kc-designation/371563 Julius Melnitzer, "Veteran litigator calls for Ontario to reinstitute KC designation", ''Law Times'', 16 November 2022.]</ref> However, the appointment of ninety-one Ontario lawyers, which included provincial Progressive Conservative cabinet ministers, conservative members of the Ontario Parliament, the Ontario Attorney General's former staff members and more than a dozen party donors drew criticism.<ref>[https://globalnews.ca/news/9841142/ontario-kings-council-appointments-controversey/ Colin D'Mello and Isaac Callan, "'Mucked this one up': Ford government under fire for King's Counsel appointments", Global News, 18 July 2023].</ref>

In response, the Premier of Ontario promised on 18 July 2023 to change how King's Counsel designations would be awarded to lawyers.  A spokesman for the [[Attorney General of Ontario]] said that in the future there will be a public application process and lawyers will have to demonstrate "a significant contribution to our justice system and work in the public interest."<ref>[https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-doug-ford-says-ontario-to-change-kings-counsel-designation-for-lawyers/ Laura Stone, "Doug Ford says Ontario to change King's Counsel designation for lawyers after patronage complaints", Globe & Mail, 18 July 2023].</ref> At a press conference to discuss the decision of the Federal Impact Assessment Act on 30 November 2023, in answer to a reporter's question, the Attorney General of Ontario advised that a new process for awarding King's Counsel designations by the Government of Ontario should be announced "soon" and "shortly."  Despite calls for the appointments in June 2023 to be rescinded, the Attorney General also confirmed that "all of the individuals who received [a King's Counsel designation] through service to the Crown will retain their designation".<ref>[Press Conference 30 November 2023 CPAC "Ontario to Apply for Judicial Review of Federal Impact Assessment Act Decision"]</ref> The head of the [[Law Society of Ontario]] had been offered a KC appointment but declined owing to the lack of selection criteria. In November 2023, the Advocates' Society wrote to the Attorney General to say that the main criterion for a KC appointment should be professional excellence rather than political affiliation and patronage, stating "If the designation is permitted to fall into such disrepute again, public confidence in the legal profession will be undermined".<ref name="Ford">{{cite news |last1=Benzie |first1=Robert |title=Doug Ford promised to end the King's Counsel controversy. Now he says no one cares |url=https://www.thestar.com/politics/provincial/doug-ford-promised-to-end-the-kings-counsel-controversy-now-he-says-no-one-cares/article_2c975298-501a-11ef-8222-77239c1ec2e6.html |access-date=2 August 2024 |work=Toronto Star |date=1 August 2024}}</ref>

In August 2024, Premier [[Doug Ford]] said that the plan to create a protocol for KC appointments was not a priority, stating: "People don't give two hoots if they have KC behind their names."<ref name="Ford"/> No further appointments have been made since July 2023, and the government has given no indication that it will make appointments in the future.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Gallant |first1=Jacques |title=Is the King's Counsel dead — again? One year on from patronage scandal, Ford government silent on future of controversial lawyers' title |url=https://www.thestar.com/politics/provincial/is-the-king-s-counsel-dead-again-one-year-on-from-patronage-scandal-ford-government/article_6bba0c8e-4833-11ef-bb7f-7be4c2ec78a9.html |access-date=24 July 2024 |work=Toronto Star |date=2 August 2024}}</ref>

===== Prince Edward Island =====

The Lieutenant Governor in Council (i.e. the provincial Cabinet) makes appointments on the recommendation of a committee consisting of the President of the Law Society of Prince Edward Island, a member of the council of the Law Society, a person appointed by the provincial Minister of Justice, a judge of either the [[Court of Appeal of Prince Edward Island|Court of Appeal]] or the [[Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island]], and a judge of the [[Provincial Court of Prince Edward Island]]. The committee's recommendations must be carried by at least a {{frac|4|5}} vote.<ref>[http://www.gov.pe.ca/law/statutes/pdf/l-06_1.pdf ''Legal Profession Act''], RSPEI, c L-6.1, s 34.</ref> To be considered for appointment, a lawyer must have 10 years at the bar of Prince Edward Island.<ref name="lawsocietypei.ca">"[http://lawsocietypei.ca/honours-awards Honours & Awards – Queen's Counsel (QC)]". Law Society of Prince Edward Island.</ref>

The lawyer must meet the following three criteria: (1) must be learned in the law; (2) must have consistently exhibited a high standard of professional integrity; and (3) must be of very good character. In addition, the lawyer must meet at least one of the following six criteria: (1) must have a reputation for excellence in the practice of law; (2) must be recognized as a leading counsel; (3) must have great expertise and an outstanding reputation; (4) must have exhibited exceptional qualities of leadership in the legal profession; (5) must have performed outstanding work in the fields of legal education or legal scholarship; or (6) must have made a great contribution to community affairs or public service.<ref name="lawsocietypei.ca"/> In 2016, the government appointed two lawyers as Queen's Counsel.<ref>"[https://www.princeedwardisland.ca/en/news/queens-counsel-appointments-named Queen's Counsel appointments named for 2016]". Government of Prince Edward Island (press release), 6 December 2016.</ref>

=====Quebec=====

The Government of Quebec stopped appointing Queen's Counsel in 1975. Over thirty years later, the Barreau of Quebec instituted a professional award, the distinction of ''Lawyer Emeritus / Avocat émérite'', with the postnominal "Ad. E." The award is to recognize lawyers "who gain distinction as a result of their outstanding professional career, outstanding contribution to the profession or outstanding social and community standing that has brought honour to the legal profession".<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.barreau.qc.ca/en/barreau/reconnaissance/avocats-emerites/ |title=Barreau du Québec; Lawyer Emeritus Distinction |access-date=9 April 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304053422/http://www.barreau.qc.ca/en/barreau/reconnaissance/avocats-emerites/ |archive-date=4 March 2016 |url-status=dead}}</ref> As of July 2018, the Barreau had awarded the distinction to over 350 lawyers.<ref>"[https://www.barreau.qc.ca/fr/le-barreau/hommage-reconnaissances/distinction-avocat-emerite/recipiendaires-avocat-emerite/ Distinction Avocat émérite — Liste des récipiendaires]" (in French). Barreau du Québec.</ref>

=====Saskatchewan=====

The Lieutenant Governor-in-Council (i.e., the provincial Cabinet) appoints lawyers as King's Counsel. To be eligible for appointment, a lawyer must reside in Saskatchewan and must have been called to the bar of any province or territory of Canada or the United Kingdom, for a period of at least 10 years.<ref>[https://www.canlii.org/en/sk/laws/stat/ss-2023-c-29/latest/ss-2023-c-29.html ''The King's Counsel Act''], SS 2023, c. 29, ss. 2, 3.</ref> Appointments are based on recommendations from a selection committee consisting of Saskatchewan's Justice Minister and Attorney General, the Chief Justice of the [[Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan]] or the Chief Justice of the [[Court of Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan|Court of Queen's Bench]] (on an alternating basis), and the past presidents of the Saskatchewan branch of the [[Canadian Bar Association]] and the [[Law Society of Saskatchewan]]. In December 2023, the Government appointed fourteen lawyers as King's Counsel, with an additional four in early 2024.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.saskatchewan.ca/government/news-and-media/2023/december/18/distinguished-lawyers-honoured-with-kings-counsel-designations | title=Distinguished Lawyers Honoured with King's Counsel Designations | publisher=Saskatchewan Government Media Release | date=18 December 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.saskatchewan.ca/government/news-and-media/2024/january/26/saskatchewan-lawyers-honoured-with-kings-counsel-designations | title=Saskatchewan Lawyers Honoured with King's Counsel Designations | publisher=Saskatchewan Government Media Release | date=26 January 2024}}</ref>

===New Zealand===

{{See also|List of King's and Queen's Counsel in New Zealand}}

In 2006, the title was renamed [[Senior Counsel]], with the final appointments of Queen's Counsel occurring in 2007, after which the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (which made the change) came into force. However, the [[2008 New Zealand general election|2008 general election]] resulted in a change of government. In June 2009, Attorney-General Hon [[Chris Finlayson|Christopher Finlayson]] announced that the title of Queen's Counsel would be reinstated,<ref name="Top lawyers may get QC title back">
{{cite web
 |url         = http://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/government+restore+queen%e2%80%99s+counsel
 |title       = Government to restore Queen's Counsel
 |date        = 25 May 2009
 |access-date  = 17 June 2009
 |publisher   = New Zealand Government
 |url-status     = dead
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20090620003554/http://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/government+restore+queen%E2%80%99s+counsel
 |archive-date = 20 June 2009}}</ref> and a bill to implement the restoration was introduced into Parliament in March 2010.<ref>[http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/SC/MakeSub/5/7/8/49SCJE_SCF_00DBHOH_BILL9795_1-Lawyers-and-Conveyancers-Amendment-Bill.htm "Lawyers and Conveyancers Amendment Bill"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101220032330/http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/SC/MakeSub/5/7/8/49SCJE_SCF_00DBHOH_BILL9795_1-Lawyers-and-Conveyancers-Amendment-Bill.htm |date=20 December 2010 }}, "Make a Submission", www.parliament.nz</ref> The bill passed committee stage in November 2012, was passed in a third reading and received the Royal Assent on 19 November 2012.<ref>{{cite web|title=Lawyers and Conveyancers Amendment Bill|url=http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Legislation/Bills/9/a/9/00DBHOH_BILL9795_1-Lawyers-and-Conveyancers-Amendment-Bill.htm|work=Legislation – Bills|publisher=New Zealand Parliament|access-date=31 December 2012|archive-date=5 November 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121105084901/http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Legislation/Bills/9/a/9/00DBHOH_BILL9795_1-Lawyers-and-Conveyancers-Amendment-Bill.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref> In December 2012, Finlayson was one of the first appointments under the reinstated regime.<ref>"[https://gazette.govt.nz/notice/id/2012-vr8344 Appointment of Queen's Counsel]" {{nowrap|(20 December 2012)}} 151 ''[[New Zealand Gazette]]'' 4437 at 4463.</ref>

=== Caribbean jurisdictions ===

{| class="wikitable"
|+
!Jurisdiction
!Appointment process<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |date=April 2023 |title=Taking the Silk Route – Designating KCs or Senior Advocates |url=https://www.commonwealthlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Taking-the-Silk-Route.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230511103122/https://www.commonwealthlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Taking-the-Silk-Route.pdf |archive-date=11 May 2023 |website=[[Commonwealth Lawyers Association]]}}</ref>
|-
|[[Antigua and Barbuda]]
|Applications made to the Silk Advisory Committee of the [[Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States]]. Recommendations made to the [[Governor-General of Antigua and Barbuda|governor general]], acting on the advice of the [[Prime Minister of Antigua and Barbuda|prime minister]].
|-
|[[The Bahamas]]
|Applications made to the attorney general, who consults with the chief justice and the president of the Bar Association and others. Recommendations forwarded to the prime minister, who advises the governor general.
|-
|[[British Virgin Islands]]
|Applications made to the Silk Advisory Committee of the [[Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States]]. Recommendations made to the [[Governor of the British Virgin Islands|governor]], acting on the advice of the [[Premier of the British Virgin Islands|premier]]
|-
|[[Grenada]]
|Applications made to the Silk Advisory Committee of the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States. Recommendations made to the governor general, acting on the advice of the prime minister.
|-
|[[Jamaica]]
|Nominations by a committee (consisting of the chief justice, the president of the Court of Appeal, the attorney general, the chairman of the General Legal Council, the president of the Jamaican Bar Association, the president of the Advocate's Association and a representative of the King's Counsel Group) are forwarded to the governor general, acting on the advice of the prime minister.
|-
|[[Montserrat]]
|Applications made to the Silk Advisory Committee of the [[Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States]]. Recommendations made to the governor, acting on the advice of the premier
|-
|[[Saint Kitts and Nevis]]
|Applications made to the Silk Advisory Committee of the [[Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States]]. Recommendations made to the governor general, acting on the advice of the premier
|-
|[[Saint Lucia]]
|Applications made to the Silk Advisory Committee of the [[Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States]]. Recommendations made to the governor general, acting on the advice of the premier
|-
|[[Saint Vincent and the Grenadines]]
|Applications made to the Silk Advisory Committee of the [[Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States]]. Recommendations made to the governor general, acting on the advice of the premier
|}

==Jurisdictions that have abolished the designation==

{{More citations needed|section|date=July 2021}}
In jurisdictions that have become republics, the office of Queen's Counsel has sometimes been replaced with an equivalent, for example, [[Senior Counsel]] in [[Barbados]],<ref name=":2" /> [[South Africa]], [[Kenya]], [[Trinidad and Tobago]]<ref name=":2" /> and [[Guyana]];<ref name=":2" /> [[Senior Advocate]] in Nigeria, India and Bangladesh; and [[President's Counsel]] in [[Sri Lanka]].

===Barbados===

With Barbados becoming a republic on 30 November 2021 and the [[President of Barbados]] replacing Queen Elizabeth II as head of state, barristers were no longer to be appointed as Queen's Counsel; however, those who had been appointed prior to the change of status were not required to adopt the title of Senior Counsel, and following the accession of King Charles to the British throne, were free to change their designation to King's Counsel.<ref>[https://www.cbc.bb/cbctest/news/local-news/change-of-designation/ Change of designation], [[Caribbean Broadcasting Corporation]], 17 September 2022</ref> Any future appointments are likely to be Senior Counsel.<ref name=":2" />

===Cyprus===

When [[British Cyprus|Cyprus]] was a [[crown colony]], the title of Queen's Counsel was granted to the colony's attorney general. Although most attorneys general in Cyprus were British, the two Cypriots who served in this position also received this title. They were [[Stelios Pavlides]], 1943–1952, and [[Criton Tornaritis]], 1952–1956, who was also the first attorney general of the [[Cyprus|Republic of Cyprus]] after its independence in 1960. Also, this title was given to lawyers with an outstanding career in the Law Office of the Colonial Government, such as [[Ioannis Clerides]], [[Neoptolemos Paschalis]] and [[George Chryssafinis]].

===Hong Kong===

{{Infobox Chinese|t=御用大律師|p=Yùyòng Dàlǜshī|w={{Tone superscript|Yü4-yung4 Ta4-lü4-shih1}}|j=jyu6 jung6 daai6 leot9 si1|t2=資深大律師|l=Barrister at His/Her Majesty's service|altname=Senior Counsel|p2=Zīshēn Dàlǜshī|w2={{Tone superscript|Tzu1-shen1 Ta4-lü4-shih1}}|j2=Zi1 sam1 daai6 leot9 si1|l2=Highly experienced and qualified Barrister|showflag=j}}

In Hong Kong, the rank of Queen's Counsel was granted when it was a [[crown colony]] and a [[British Overseas Territories|British dependent territory]]. A practising barrister could be appointed as Queen's Counsel in recognition of his or her professional eminence by Crown Patent on the advice of the [[Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Hong Kong]].<ref>[http://www.hkba.org/the-bar/aboutus/index.html About the Bar Association] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090512191229/http://www.hkba.org/the-bar/aboutus/index.html |date=12 May 2009 }} Hong Kong Bar Association.</ref> As Hong Kong was transferred from the United Kingdom in 1997, barristers are no longer appointed Queen's Counsel (QC), but [[Senior Counsel]] (SC). The change is in name only; the role is in all practical respects unchanged even down to the full bottomed wig, gloves, robe and shoes worn annually at the commencement of the Judicial Year.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hkba.org/content/about-us|title=About HKBA|website=Hong Kong Bar Association|access-date=16 March 2017}}</ref> Those appointed before the change were renamed Senior Counsel.<ref>See the savings and transitional provisions contained in s. 2 of Schedule 2 to Ordinance No. 94 of 1997</ref> King's Counsel that were recognised in another jurisdiction however continue to be recognised and are given the same status as Senior Counsel.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Hong Kong e-Legislation |url=https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/checkconfig/checkClientConfig.jsp?applicationId=RA001 |access-date=2025-10-08 |website=www.elegislation.gov.hk}}</ref>

===Ireland===

The title of King's Counsel was conferred until July 1924. The only King's Counsel appointed under the [[Irish Free State]] was [[John O'Byrne]], who was the [[Attorney General of Ireland]], then later on, he was a judge on both the [[High Court of Ireland]] and the [[Supreme Court of Ireland]].

The title of [[Senior Counsel]] was introduced in the [[Irish Free State]] in July 1924.<ref name="dail19490224">[https://archive.today/20130217205252/http://debates.oireachtas.ie/dail/1949/02/24/00005.asp Vol.114 No.4 cols.493–5] 24 February 1949</ref> Patents were issued by the [[Chief Justice of Ireland|Chief Justice of the Irish Free State]] and since 1937, patents are issued by the [[Chief Justice of Ireland]].

However, many barristers continued to describe themselves as K.C. long after independence, even those who had been [[called to the bar]] after 1924. As late as the 1960s, R.G.L. Leonard (made KC before 1922) was described in the official Irish [[law report]]s as "Queen's Counsel", reflecting the accession of [[Elizabeth II]] in 1952.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Hall|first=Eamonn|date=April 2005|title=The ancien régime|journal=Law Society Gazette|publisher=[[Law Society of Ireland]]|volume=99|issue=3|page=14|url=http://www.lawsociety.ie/Documents/Gazette/Gazette%202005/april2005.pdf#page=14|access-date=6 January 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170511123108/https://www.lawsociety.ie/Documents/Gazette/Gazette%202005/april2005.pdf#page=14|archive-date=11 May 2017|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref>

===Malta===

As a British [[Crown Colony of Malta|Crown Colony, Malta]] adopted the system which lasted only seven years, starting from 14 August 1832. In the period, the main courts were housed at the [[Castellania (Valletta)|Castellania]], and the wearing of silk gowns was required by those sitting on the [[bench (law)|bench]].<ref>{{cite journal|journal=Scientia |last=Harding |first=Hugh W. |date=1950 |title=Advocates Under the Code de Rohan and the Present Law |url=http://melitensiawth.com/incoming/Index/Scientia%20(Malta)/Scientia.%2016(1950)3(Jul.-Sept.)/02.pdf |volume=3 |issue=2 |page=121 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170520111517/http://melitensiawth.com/incoming/Index/Scientia%20%28Malta%29/Scientia.%2016%281950%293%28Jul.-Sept.%29/02.pdf |archive-date=20 May 2017 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

===Nigeria===

[[Nigeria]] replaced the QC nomenclature with the new title of [[Senior Advocate of Nigeria]] (SAN) beginning in 1975. Appointments are restricted to fewer than 30 lawyers a year, made by the Chief Justice of Nigeria on the recommendation of the Legal Practitioners Privileges Committee, which is made up of senior judges and lawyers. The qualification requirements are almost identical to those required for appointment as King's Counsel. The SANs are entitled to wear silk gowns and enjoy similar privileges as the King's Counsel.

===Singapore===

Since independence, the title of Queen's Counsel was replaced by [[Senior Counsel]].

===South Africa===

Following the establishment of a republic on 31 May 1961, the title of Queen's Counsel was replaced by [[Senior Counsel#South Africa|Senior Counsel]],<ref>[https://www.google.co.uk/search?num=30&biw=800&bih=494&tbm=bks&q=%22The+Bar+was+formerly+divided+into+Queen%27s+Counsel+and+advocates+and+since+1961+into+Senior+Counsel+and+advocates%22&oq=%22The+Bar+was+formerly+divided+into+Queen%27s+Counsel+and+advocates+and+since+1961+into+Senior+Counsel+and+advocates%22&gs_l=serp.3...11511.20929.0.22463.2.2.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0....0...1c.1.64.serp..2.0.0.zWLr1UH8-0s ''The Oxford Companion to Law''], David M. Walker, 1980, p. 1162</ref> or ''Senior Advokaat'' in [[Afrikaans]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=0VI5AQAAIAAJ&q=%22Senior+Advokaat%22+%22Senior+Counsel%22 ''International Bar Journal''], Volume 1, International Bar Association, 1970, p. 9</ref>

===Sri Lanka===

[[President's Counsel]] ([[List of post-nominal letters#Sri Lanka|postnominal]] '''PC''') is a professional rank, as their status is conferred by the [[president of Sri Lanka|president]], recognised by the courts and wear silk gowns of a special design. It is the equivalent of the rank of King's Counsel in the United Kingdom, which was used in Ceylon (Sri Lanka) until 1972 when Sri Lanka became a republic, when the position became that of [[President's Counsel|Senior Attorney-at-Law]]. In 1984, the position became the President's Counsel. The holder can use the [[post-nominal letters]] ''PC'' after his or her name.

===Zambia===

In [[Zambia]] the designation was changed to State Counsel after independence from Britain in 1964. Legal practitioners who enjoy the rank and dignity of State Counsel may use "SC" after their names. The procedure for appointment is more or less based on the English system, but it has been alleged that this merit-based system has recently been influenced by political patronage and that the last three presidents have mainly appointed their supporters. In 2013, the [[Law Association of Zambia]] objected to the process used when President [[Michael Sata]] appointed [[Mumba Kapumpa]], [[John Sangwa]] and [[Robert Simeza]] as SCs.<ref>{{cite news|title=LAZ opposes Sata over SC status|url=https://zambiadailynation.com/2013/05/11/laz-opposes-sata-over-sc-status/|access-date=19 December 2016|work=Daily Nation (Zambia)|date=11 May 2013|archive-date=20 December 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161220182657/https://zambiadailynation.com/2013/05/11/laz-opposes-sata-over-sc-status/|url-status=usurped}}</ref>

===Zimbabwe===

Following the declaration of a republic by the [[Ian Smith|Smith]] regime in [[Rhodesia]], senior advocates were designated as [[Senior Counsel]].<ref>[https://www.google.co.uk/search?num=30&rlz=1C1GGRV_enGB751GB751&biw=1024&bih=662&tbm=bks&q=%22%27State+for+%27Crown%27+and+Senior+Counsel+for+Queen%27s+Counsel%27%22&oq=%22%27State+for+%27Crown%27+and+Senior+Counsel+for+Queen%27s+Counsel%27%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3...14867.18036.0.18631.2.2.0.0.0.0.66.130.2.2.0.dummy_maps_web_fallback...0...1.1.64.psy-ab..0.0.0....0.yDUUFuwt4RA ''Annual Survey of African Law''], [[Rex Collings]], 1970, p. 185</ref> Despite this, existing Queen's Counsels' designations were not affected.<ref>[https://www.google.co.uk/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=%22Although+all+future+appointments+in+Rhodesia+will+be+known+as+Senior+Counsel%2C+existing+Queen%27s+Counsel+will+not+be+affected%22 ''Rhodesian Commentary''], Volumes 3–5, Ministry of Information, Immigration and Tourism, 1969, p. 21</ref>

==<span class="anchor" id="King's Counsel dress">Dress</span>==

{{Main|Court dress}}
The following relates to the dress of King's Counsel at the Bar of England and Wales. Most other jurisdictions adopt the same dress, but there are some local variations.

King's Counsel in England and Wales have two forms of official dress, depending on whether they are dressing for appearance in court before a judge or a ceremonial occasion.

===Court dress===

A male junior barrister wears a white shirt and white wing-collar with bands, underneath a double-breasted or three-piece lounge suit of dark colour. He has a black "stuff" gown over his suit, and wears a short wig of horsehair. A female junior barrister wears similar garb, except that the wing-collar with bands may be replaced with a court bib (or collarette).

Upon promotion to King's Counsel, the male barrister retains in court his winged collar, bands, and short wig. However, instead of an ordinary dark jacket, he wears a special black court coat (frock coat) and waistcoat in a style unique to King's Counsel or, alternatively, a long-sleeved waistcoat in similar style with no frock coat, known as a "bum freezer" because it is cut off at the waist.

He also replaces the black stuff gown of a junior barrister with a black silk gown, although cheaper variants are also worn, including gowns of the same cut but all wool, or in a silk-wool mix, or in artificial silk. The all-wool gown is, strictly speaking, a mourning gown, the Bar being still in mourning for [[Anne, Queen of Great Britain|Queen Anne]] who died on 1 August 1714, but that point is now of historical interest only.{{citation needed|date=April 2021}} A female King's Counsel wears a gown and wig similar to that of her male counterparts.

===Ceremonial dress===

For ceremonial occasions, King's Counsel wear black breeches and black stockings instead of trousers, and patent leather court shoes with buckles. They wear the same black frock coat and waistcoat worn when appearing in court (never the "bum freezer", however) but add lace at the wrists and a lace stock at the collar. Bands are no longer worn at the collar in addition to the lace, and the winged collar is also dispensed with. They have white cotton gloves, but these are invariably carried and not worn. This part of their ceremonial dress is taken from the standard ceremonial dress worn at the Royal Court (as opposed to the Courts of Justice) by other courtiers.

In addition, however, King's Counsel wear distinctive full-bottomed wigs and their silk gowns. The silk gown is the same as that worn when appearing in court. It is this gown which gives rise to the colloquial reference to King's Counsel as ''silks'' and to the phrase ''taking silk'' referring to their appointment.

When wearing the full bottomed wig, King's Counsel have a black rosette hanging from the back of the neck, which was originally intended to catch oil and powder that might otherwise mark the silk gown. Modern wigs, however, are made of horsehair and so there is no longer any oil or powder.

==See also==

{{Portal|Law}}
* [[Senior Counsel]], similar status used by some Australian jurisdictions and by some jurisdictions in which the British monarch is not head of state.
* [[Serjeant-at-law]], a now defunct rank of senior barrister.
* [[King's Counsel Selection Panel]], The King's Counsel Selection Panel for England and Wales.
* [[Silk (TV series)|''Silk'' (TV series)]], a BBC 2011 legal drama showing the competitive pursuit of silk.
* ''[[Kavanagh QC]]'', a 1995–2001 [[ITV (TV network)|ITV]] legal drama starring [[John Thaw]].

==References==
{{Reflist}}

==External links==

{{Commons category}}
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20100401104421/http://www.legalnewscentral.co.uk/2010/02/26/the-queens-counsel-of-england-and-wales-2010/ The Queen's Counsel of England and Wales 2010]
* [http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/qcfuture/responses/qc332.pdf Paper on Queen's Counsel constitutional reforms]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20071115191947/http://www.nsbs.ns.ca/qc/qc_historical.htm Queen's Counsel – Historical Context] a paper written in 2001 for the [[Nova Scotia]] Barristers' Society reviewing the history of the QC and current practices throughout Canada and the Commonwealth.
* [https://www.theguardian.com/guardianpolitics/story/0,3605,1189337,00.html Guardian 2004-04-10: QC system replaced by new scheme after 400 years]
* [https://www.theguardian.com/guardianpolitics/story/0,3605,1225397,00.html Guardian 2004-05-28: U-turn lets QC title live on for now]
* [http://www.qcapplications.org.uk Website for the English KC appointments procedure]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20070315215410/http://www.admfincs.forces.gc.ca/admfincs/subjects/cfao/018-04_e.asp Canadian Forces Administrative Order 18-4 Recommendations for Canadian Orders, Decorations and Military Honours]
<!--
* [http://www.gnn.gov.uk/environment/detail.asp?ReleaseID=215527&NewsAreaID=2&NavigatedFromDepartment=True  List of the successful candidates in 2006]
* [http://www.gnn.gov.uk/environment/detail.asp?ReleaseID=233990&NewsAreaID=2&NavigatedFromDepartment=True List of QC appointments ''honoris causa'' in 2006]
*** DEAD LINKS*** -->

[[Category:King's Counsel| ]]
[[Category:Bar of England and Wales]]
[[Category:Common law]]
[[Category:Law of Australia]]
[[Category:Law of Canada]]
[[Category:Law of New Zealand]]
[[Category:Law of the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Law enforcement in Wales]]