View source for Rights of Man

{{short description|Set of essays by Thomas Paine}}
{{distinguish|text=[[Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen]] (1789), ''[[A Vindication of the Rights of Men]]'' (1790) by Mary Wollstonecraft, or ''The Rights of Man'' (1940) by [[H. G. Wells]]}}
{{about||the album by The Wolfe Tones|The Rights of Man (album){{!}}''The Rights of Man'' (album)}}
{{Use British English|date=November 2024}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2024}}
{{Infobox book
| name = Rights of Man
| image = PaineRightsOfMan.png
| caption = Title page from the first edition
| author = [[Thomas Paine]]
| illustrator =
| cover_artist =
| country = Britain
| language = English
| series =
| subject = The French Revolution
| genre =
| publisher =
| release_date = 1791
| english_release_date =
| pages =
| isbn =
}}
{{Libertarianism in England|works}}
{{republicanism sidebar}}
'''''Rights of Man''''' is a book by [[Thomas Paine]] first published in 1791, including 31 articles, positing that popular political revolution is permissible when a government does not safeguard the [[Natural rights and legal rights|natural rights]] of its people. Using these points as a base, it defends the [[French Revolution]] against [[Edmund Burke]]'s attack in ''[[Reflections on the Revolution in France]]'' (1790).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ushistory.org/paine/rights/index.htm|title=''Rights of Man''<!-- Bot generated title -->}}</ref>

It was published in Britain in two parts in March 1791 and February 1792.<ref name="bl.uk">{{cite web|url=http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/takingliberties/staritems/635painerightsofman.html|title=Taking Liberties – Star Items – Paine's ''Rights of Man''}}</ref>

==Background==
Paine was a very strong supporter of the [[French Revolution]] that began in 1789; he visited France the following year. Many British thinkers supported it, including [[Richard Price]], who initiated the [[Revolution Controversy]] with his sermon and pamphlet drawing favourable parallels between the [[Glorious Revolution]] of 1688 and the French Revolution. Conservative intellectual [[Edmund Burke]] responded with a counter-revolutionary attack entitled ''[[Reflections on the Revolution in France]]'' (1790), which strongly appealed to the [[landed gentry|landed class]] and sold 30,000 copies.<ref name=autogenerated1>Mark Philp, "Paine, Thomas (1737–1809)", ''Oxford Dictionary of National Biography'', Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn, May 2008 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/21133, accessed 4 July 2012]</ref> Paine's ''Rights of Man'' was printed by London publisher [[Joseph Johnson (publisher)|Joseph Johnson]] for publication on 21 February 1791, then withdrawn for [[self-censorship|fear of prosecution]].<ref name=autogenerated1 /> J. S. Jordan stepped in and published it on 16 March.<ref name=autogenerated1 /> The 90,000-word book appeared on 13 March, three weeks later than scheduled. It sold as many as one million copies and was "eagerly read by reformers, [[English Dissenters|Protestant dissenters]], democrats, London craftsman, and the skilled factory-hands of the new industrial north".<ref>George Rudé, ''Revolutionary Europe: 1783–1815'' (1964) p. 183</ref> [[William Godwin]] and [[Thomas Holcroft]] helped with the publishing of the book, {{Sfnm|1a1=Butler|1y=1984|1pp=107–108|2a1=Marshall|2y=2008|2p=195|3a1=Thomas|3y=2019|3p=14–15}} Godwin declared that "the seeds of revolution it contains are so vigorous in their stamina, that nothing can overpower them."{{Sfn|Thomas|2019|p=15}}

==Arguments==
Paine argues that the interests of the monarch and his people are united, and insists that the French Revolution should be understood as one which attacks the despotic principles of the French monarchy, not the king himself, and he takes the [[Bastille]], the main prison in Paris, to symbolise the [[despotism]] that had been overthrown.<ref name=autogenerated1 />

[[Natural and legal rights|Human rights originate in Nature]]; thus, rights cannot be granted via political charter, because that implies that rights are legally revocable, hence, would be privileges:

{{quote|... It is a perversion of terms to say that a charter gives rights. It operates by a contrary effect—that of taking rights away. Rights are inherently in all the inhabitants; but charters, by annulling those rights, in the majority, leave the right, by exclusion, in the hands of a few ... They ... consequently are instruments of injustice ... The fact, therefore, must be that the individuals, themselves, each, in his own personal and sovereign right, entered into a contract with each other to produce a government: and this is the only mode in which governments have a right to arise, and the only principle on which they have a right to exist.|2=''Rights of Man'', I, London, 1795, pp. [https://books.google.com/books?id=M4cBAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA125 125]–[https://books.google.com/books?id=M4cBAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA126 126], ''Rights of Man'', II, London, 1795, p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=kkYUAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA13 13].}}

Government's sole purpose is safeguarding the individual and his/her inherent, inalienable rights; each societal institution that does not benefit the nation is illegitimate—especially monarchy and aristocracy. The book's acumen derives from the [[Age of Enlightenment]] and has been linked to the ''[[Two Treatises of Government#Second Treatise|Second Treatise of Government]]'', by [[John Locke]] (even though Paine himself claimed to have never read this work).<ref>J. Fruchtman jr., ''The Political Philosophy of Thomas Paine'', Baltimore, 2009, p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=HqJeb93uwTwC&pg=PA5 5].</ref>

The fuller development of this position seems to have been worked out one night in France after an evening spent with [[Thomas Jefferson]], and possibly [[Gilbert du Motier, marquis de Lafayette|Lafayette]], discussing a pamphlet by the Philadelphia conservative [[James Wilson (Founding Father)|James Wilson]] on the proposed federal constitution.<ref name=autogenerated1 /><ref>T. Paine – introd. ed. anot. M. Philp, ''Rights of Man, Common Sense, and Other Political Writings'', Oxford – e.a., 1995, p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=slgVDAAAQBAJ&pg=PR18 xviii].</ref>

===Reformation of the English government===
''Rights of Man'' concludes in proposing practical reformations of English government such as a [[Constitution of the United Kingdom|written constitution]] composed by a national assembly, in the American mould; the elimination of [[aristocratic class|aristocratic titles]], because democracy is incompatible with [[primogeniture]], which leads to the despotism of the family; a national budget without allotted military and war expenses; lower taxes for the poor, and [[right to education|subsidised education]] for them; and a [[progressive tax|progressive income tax]] weighted against wealthy estates to prevent the re-emergence of a hereditary aristocracy.

==Aristocracy==
Principally, ''Rights of Man'' opposes the idea of [[hereditary government]]—the belief that dictatorial government is necessary, because of man's corrupt, essential nature. Although other late-18th-century writers such as [[James Murray (historian)|James Murray]] and [[John Cartwright (political reformer)|Major John Cartwright]] criticized the outsized role played by the aristocracy in the government, Paine was arguably the first to advocate the eradication of titles and hereditary government. In ''Reflections on the Revolution in France'' (1790) Edmund Burke says that true social stability arises if the nation's poor majority are governed by a minority of wealthy aristocrats, and that lawful inheritance of power (wealth, religious, governing) ensured the propriety of political power being the exclusive domain of the nation's élite [[social class]]—the nobility.

''Rights of Man'' denounces Burke's assertion of the nobility's inherent ''hereditary wisdom''; countering the implication that a nation has not a right to form a Government for governing itself. Paine refutes Burke's definition of Government as "a contrivance of human wisdom". Instead, Paine argues that Government is a contrivance of man, and it follows that [[hereditary succession]] and hereditary rights to govern cannot compose a Government—because the wisdom to govern cannot be inherited.

==Heredity==
Edmund Burke's counter-revolutionary ''Reflections on the French Revolution'' delineates the legitimacy of aristocratic government to the 1688 Parliamentary resolution declaring [[William and Mary of Orange]]—and their heirs—to be the true rulers of England. Paine puts forward two arguments against this view. Firstly, he argues that "Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded it." Secondly, Paine counters that the institution of monarchy should not be historically traced from 1688, but from 1066, when [[William of Normandy]] forcibly imposed his Norman rule upon Englishmen.

Thomas Paine's intellectual influence is perceptible in the two great political revolutions of the eighteenth century. He dedicated ''Rights of Man'' to [[George Washington]] and to the [[Marquis de Lafayette]], acknowledging the importance of the American and the French revolutions.

Thus, the [[Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen]] (''Déclaration des droits de l'Homme et du citoyen'') can be encapsulated so: (1) Men are born, and always continue, free and equal in respect of their rights. Civil distinctions, therefore, can be founded only on public utility; (2) The end of all political associations is the preservation of the natural and imprescriptible rights of man; and these rights are liberty, property, security, and resistance of oppression; and (3) The nation is essentially the source of all sovereignty; neither can any individual, nor any body of men, be entitled to any authority, which is not expressly derived from it.

These capsulations are akin to the self-evident truths concept that the [[United States Declaration of Independence|U.S. Declaration of Independence]] expresses.

==Welfare==
{{Original research|section|date=December 2018}}
{{Page numbers needed|section|date=December 2018}}
In the closing chapters of ''Rights of Man'', Paine addresses the condition of the poor and outlines a detailed social welfare proposal predicated upon the redirection of [[government expenditures]].<ref name=":0">Seaman, John W. "Thomas Paine: Ransom, Civil Peace and the Natural Right to Welfare." ''Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency'', Sage Publications, Inc, February 1988, {{doi|10.1177/0090591788016001007}}. </ref> From the onset, Paine asserts all citizens have an inherent claim to welfare.  Unlike such writers as James Burgh who sought to limit assistance to the better behaved segments of the poor,<ref>Chiu, Frances. ''The Routledge Guidebook to Paine's Rights of Man''. Routledge, 2020. p. 231. </ref> Paine declares welfare is not charity, but an irrevocable right.<ref name=":4">"Thomas Paine on a Plan for a Welfare State." ''Population and Development Review'', vol. 39, no. 2, 2013, pp. 325–332. {{JSTOR|41857598}}. </ref>  Paine's understanding of welfare seemingly follows his idea of political government.  He notes, "Man did not enter into society to become worse than he was before, nor to have fewer rights than he had before, but to have those rights better secured".<ref name=":2">Paine, Thomas, and Mark Philp. ''Rights of Man, Common Sense, and Other Political Writings''. Oxford University Press, 2008. p. 119 </ref>   In congruence with his previous works, Paine emphasizes the compatibility between individual rights and societal wellbeing.  He fervently contends that crippling poverty undermines the rights of an individual, and consequently the legitimacy of government.  Not surprisingly then, Paine staunchly opposed and criticizes the [[English Poor Laws]] in place at the time, claiming the laws are highly ineffective and primitive in nature.<ref name=":4"/> Paine critiques the societal conditions promulgated by the Poor Laws saying, "When in countries that are called civilized, we see age going to the workhouse and youth to the [[gallows]], something must be wrong with the system of government".<ref name="Paine, Thomas 2008">Paine, Thomas, and Mark Philp. ''Rights of Man, Common Sense, and Other Political Writings''. Oxford University Press, 2008.</ref> He argues for their complete abolition, and in their place the enactment of a welfare program that assists the young, old, and struggling individuals.<ref name=":0"/>  Paine's welfare proposal is pillared by education and tax reform; the latter was to be accomplished through progressive taxes on property.  Paine contends the poor population consists mostly of children and the elderly, who are unable to participate in the workforce.<ref name=":2"/> In addition to the elderly and children, Paine also concedes that there are still some others rendered poor from the economic burden of tax and children.<ref name=":4"/>  In accordance with his belief that charity as a natural right, Paine presumes only [[Republicanism|republican]] or [[Democracy|democratic]] regimes can effectively carry out successful welfare programs.  Though Paine does not directly condone or promote an uprising against the [[Monarchy of the United Kingdom|British monarchy]], and utilizes rather subdued rhetoric in comparison to his other controversial works, revolutionary currents run beneath the surface of the text.

An implication that arises from Paine's social welfare reformation is cost.  Paine observes, at the time of his writing, England's rough population to be about 7 million people.<ref name=":4"/>  He also supposes that around one-fifth of the population is poor.<ref name=":4"/>  The number of poor then, according to Paine's estimations, would total around 1,400,000 people in need of support.<ref name="ReferenceA">Paine, Thomas, and Mark Philp. ''Rights of Man, Common Sense, and Other Political Writings''. Oxford University Press, 2008.</ref>  Paine contends the remedy for financing such a large welfare endeavor would be to cut military expenditures of the state and redirect the funds towards the people of the state.<ref name="ReferenceA"/>  Paine argues that since the [[Age of Revolution|age of revolution]] rendered a new era of peace, the government no longer need devote so many resources toward [[monarchical wars]].<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/paine/#Welf|title=Thomas Paine|last=Philp|first=Mark|series=Stanford Encyclopedia|date=18 September 2023 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University }}</ref> Instead, Paine suggests, the surplus of tax revenue could be reintegrated back into society with the formation of a welfare program.  He also estimates that nearly £4 million, out of £17 million in total tax revenues from [[customs]] and [[Excise|excise duties]], could be salvaged from the government's expenditure and redirected and redistributed to the people of the nation.<ref name="ReferenceA"/>  Paine questions, "Is it, then, better that the lives of one hundred and forty thousand aged persons be rendered comfortable, or that a million a year of public money be expended on any one individual, and him often of the most worthless or insignificant character?"<ref name="ReferenceA"/>  Paine concludes that by his model £3,640,000 will be [[Remittance|remitted]] to the poor.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> Paine's allotments for the poor and elderly were far more generous than contemporary payments from the poor rates.<ref>Chiu, p. 232.</ref>

===Youth and education===
Education is a foundational cornerstone of Paine's welfare plan.  Paine claims, "A nation under a well-regulated government, should permit none to remain uninstructed".<ref name="Paine, Thomas 2008"/>  Paine largely focuses on educating the youth population.  He contends that, educating children will ultimately compel the betterment of society holistically.<ref name=":4"/>  Paine insists a proactive social [[welfare spending|welfare]] system that educates the country's youth, will act as a preventive measure, and engender greater knowledge amongst the population.  He explains that poor children and young people are typically deprived of equal access to education.<ref name=":4"/>  Poor children coming from poor families are often forced to seek [[Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009|apprenticeships]] and work, and are thus subsequently robbed of the ability to pursue education. Poverty then, becomes cyclical in nature and undoubtedly increases with time.<ref name=":0"/>  Lack of education amongst the young population, Paine asserts, will also lead to increased violence and crime.<ref name=":4"/>  To combat this problem, Paine proposes a [[remission of taxes]] to poor families; £4 a year for every child under the age of 14, granting the parents of the children send them to school.<ref name="Paine, Thomas 2008"/> For 630,000 children, Paine estimates the cost to be £2,520,000.<ref name="Paine, Thomas 2008"/>  Paine states, "By adopting this method, not only the poverty of the parents will be relieved, but ignorance will be banished from the rising generation, and the number of poor will hereafter become less, because their abilities, by the aid of education, will be greater".<ref name="Paine, Thomas 2008"/> Paine's advocacy for education among the poor was novel not only in 1792, but in 1807 when [[Davies Giddy]] criticized [[Samuel Whitbread (1764–1815)|Samuel Whitbread]]'s bill for the establishment of parish schools.<ref>Chiu, p. 230. </ref> In the same vein, Paine also suggest women should receive maternity benefits immediately after the birth of a child.<ref name=":0" />

===Elderly===
Paramount to Paine's welfare plan is care of the elderly population.  Paine divides age into two classes; the first he calls "the approach of age" class and the second "old age" class.<ref name=":4"/>  Those classified as being in the "approach of age" group are over fifty years of age yet under 60 years of age, while "old age" commences at the age of sixty years old.<ref name="Paine, Thomas 2008"/>  Paine notes that though individuals in the approach of age class retain their mental faculties, the decline of their physical health limits their ability to work, which consequently affects their earnings.<ref name="Paine, Thomas 2008"/>  Those of old age, Paine declares, are fully incapable of laborious work and are ultimately driven to work themselves to death in current society.<ref name=":4"/>  Paine resolves to pay approach of age persons the sum of £6 per annum out of the surplus taxes, and to pay old age persons £10 per annum.<ref name="Paine, Thomas 2008"/>  Figuring there will be 70,000 persons in the approach of age class and 70,000 persons in the old age class, Paine estimates the expense to be 1,120,000.<ref name="Paine, Thomas 2008"/>

===Proposal conditions===
In tandem with redirecting government expenditures, Paine suggests the development of what some may call a "[[workhouse]]", or place of employment for poor people.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.londonlives.org/static/Workhouses.jsp|title=Background – Workhouses |website=www.LondonLives.org|access-date=2018-12-05}}</ref>  Paine's describes the workhouse as being a building, or buildings, with the capability of holding a minimum of 6,000 people.<ref name=":4"/> In these buildings, operating businesses would indiscriminately accept applications, so that every city citizen could find employment.<ref name=":4"/>  In order for Paine's plan to be carried out effectively, he cites some conditions that must be met.  He resolves that each person seeking employment from these workhouses must stay in the program for a minimum of three months; however, during their residency all employees shall receive wholesome meals, warm lodgings, receive a proportional stipend for the work they've completed, and may work as long or as little as they deem appropriate.<ref name=":2" />  The asylum, Paine declares, would assist any persons in temporary distress and would serve around 24,000 people a year.<ref name=":2" /> To finance the development of this project, Paine suggest using the revenue from the state's coal tax.<ref name=":4"/> Paine states that at the time he is writing, the tax revenue is used to support the [[Duke of Richmond]].  Paine ultimately finds this particular deplorable, and calls for the reallocation of coal tax funds back to the people.<ref name=":4" />

Paine concludes his section on welfare by listing the eight central tenets of his welfare proposal, or what he calls the "enumerating particulars", which are as follows:

# Abolish 2 million poor rates.
# Provision for 252,000 poor families.
# Education for 1,030,000 children.
# Comfortable provision for 140,000 aged persons.
# Donation of 20 shillings each for 50,000 births.
# Donation of 20 shillings each for 20,000 marriages.
# Allowance of £20,000 for the funeral expenses of deceased travelers far from home.
# Employment at all times for the casual poor in cities.<ref name=":2" />

==Analysis and public impact==
According to [[Mark Philp]], "In many respects ''Rights of Man'' is a disordered mix of narrative, principled argument, and rhetorical appeal—betraying the composite materials Paine used and the speed with which it was composed."<ref name=autogenerated1 />

It was quickly reprinted and widely circulated, with copies being read aloud in inns and [[English coffeehouses in the 17th and 18th centuries|coffee houses]], so that by May some 50,000 copies were said to be in circulation. Of the 300 or more pamphlets which the revolution controversy spawned, ''Rights of Man'' was the first to seriously damage Burke's case and to restore credit to the French both in Britain and America.<ref name=autogenerated1 />

The publication of ''Rights of Man'' caused a furore in England; [[Trial of Thomas Paine|Paine was tried ''in absentia'']], and convicted of [[seditious libel]] against the Crown, but was unavailable for hanging, being in France and never returning to England. ([[Sir Archibald Macdonald, 1st Baronet]] served as the prosecutor.)

Thomas Paine was not the only advocate of the rights of man or the only author of a work titled ''Rights of Man''. The working-class radical, [[Thomas Spence]], is among the first, in England, to use the phrase as a title. His 1775 lecture, usually titled ''The Rights of Man'', and his later ''The Rights of Infants'', offer a proto-[[georgist]] take on political philosophy mirroring Paine's work [[Agrarian Justice]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://thomas-spence-society.co.uk|title=thomas spence.co.uk – Home<!-- Bot generated title -->}}</ref>  Paine's acquaintance [[Mary Wollstonecraft]], whom he met via their common publisher, wrote ''[[A Vindication of the Rights of Men]]'' as one of the first responses to Burke's attack on Richard Price. Her work was in print in December 1790, and was well reviewed. She extended the arguments in the book for which she is best remembered, the 1792 ''[[A Vindication of the Rights of Woman]]''.

==See also==
* ''[[Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen]]'' – a fundamental document of the French Revolution, adopted in 1789
* [[Social contract]]
* [[Thomas Muir (political reformer)]]

==References==
{{Reflist}}

==Sources==
* {{cite book|last=Butler|first=Marilyn|author-link=Marilyn Butler|title=Burke, Paine, Godwin, and the Revolution Controversy|location=[[Cambridge]]|publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|year=1984|isbn=0-521-28656-5}}
* {{cite book|first=Peter H.|last = Marshall|author-link=Peter Marshall (author, born 1946)|title=[[Demanding the Impossible|Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism]]|year=2008|orig-year=1992|location=[[London]]|publisher=[[Harper Perennial]]|isbn=978-0-00-686245-1|oclc=218212571}}
* {{cite book|last=Thomas|first=Richard Gough|year=2019|title=William Godwin: A Political Life|location=[[London]]|publisher=[[Pluto Press]]|isbn=978-1-7868-0389-4|oclc=1090781689}}

==External links==
{{Wikisource|Rights of Man|''Rights of Man''}}
* {{StandardEbooks|Standard Ebooks URL=https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/thomas-paine/the-rights-of-man}}
* {{librivox book | title=Rights Of Man | author=Thomas PAINE}}

{{Thomas Paine}}
{{Political philosophy}}
{{Authority control}}

[[Category:1791 non-fiction books]]
[[Category:Classical liberalism]]
[[Category:Books about liberalism]]
[[Category:Books about political philosophy]]
[[Category:Books by Thomas Paine]]
[[Category:Censored books]]
[[Category:Human rights]]