View source for Sousveillance

{{Short description|Recording of an activity by a participant}}
{{Multiple issues|
{{Neutral|date=June 2024}}
{{Unfocused|date=June 2024}}
{{Overly detailed|date=June 2024}}
}}
[[File:Sousveillance.svg|300px|thumb|Camera A is engaged in surveillance, while the person wearing camera B on their head is engaged in sousveillance.]]
[[File:SurveillanceSousveillanceLifeGloggingMannSensecamMemoto.jpg|thumb|Surveillance as compared with sousveillance|300px]]'''Sousveillance''' ({{IPAc-en|s|uː|ˈ|v|eɪ|l|ə|n|s}} {{respell|soo|VAY|lənss}}) is the recording of an activity by a member of the public, rather than a person or organisation in authority, typically by way of small [[wearable technology|wearable]] or portable personal technologies.{{refn|name=defs1|<ref name="MannNolanWellman">[https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/3344 "Sousveillance: Inventing and Using Wearable Computing Devices...] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090325090745/http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/articles1(3)/sousveillance.pdf |date=2009-03-25 }}", by Steve Mann, Jason Nolan and Barry Wellman, in Surveillance & Society 1(3), 2003</ref><ref name="Sousveillance 2004, pp. 620–627">''Sousveillance: Inverse Surveillance in Multimedia Imaging'', by Steve Mann, in ACM Multimedia 2004, pp. 620–627</ref><ref>"Keeping a Close Watch", by Kingsley Dennis, Sociology Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK, 2008 July 30th, in The Sociological Review</ref><ref>[http://wearcam.org/metalandflesh.htm Sousveillance, not just surveillance, in response to terrorism] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120625100903/http://www.wearcam.org/metalandflesh.htm |date=2012-06-25 }}, 2002 March 1st, Metal and Flesh, Volume 6, No. 1</ref><ref>Vol. 31, Issue 2 – April 1998 "Reflectionism' and 'Diffusionism': New Tactics for Deconstructing the Video Surveillance Superhighway", in Leonardo, pp. 93–102</ref><ref>"Sousveillance, Media and Strategic Political Communication", by Dr. Vian Bakir, {{ISBN|978-0-8264-3009-0}}</ref><ref>Ryan, Mary. "Sousveillance as a Tool in US Civic Polity." In Spaces of Surveillance, pp. 211–227. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2017.</ref><ref>university course on sousveillance
[http://www.ischool.berkeley.edu/courses/290-sscd Home › Courses › Course Catalog › 290. Surveillance, Sousveillance, Coveillance, and Dataveillance] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111013211220/http://www.ischool.berkeley.edu/courses/290-sscd |date=2011-10-13 }}
290. Surveillance, Sousveillance, Coveillance, and Dataveillance</ref><ref>International conferences on sousveillance: {{cite web |url=http://www.notanalternative.net/tp-sousveillance-culture-conference-426 |title=Not An Alternative ITP Sousveillance Culture Conference – 4/26|access-date=2010-08-15 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120905210719/http://www.notanalternative.net/tp-sousveillance-culture-conference-426 |archive-date=2012-09-05 }} and [http://wearcam.org/iwis/]</ref><ref>[https://www.wired.com/magazine/2011/06/st_thompson_videomonitoaring/ WiReD magazine], Clive Thompson, "Establishing Rules in the Videocam Age", 2011 June 28</ref><ref>[http://www.vancouverobserver.com/GTA/2011/06/28/reflections-vancouver-riots-and-fragility-civilization Reflections on the Vancouver Riots] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110701182850/http://www.vancouverobserver.com/GTA/2011/06/28/reflections-vancouver-riots-and-fragility-civilization |date=2011-07-01 }}, Vancouver Observer, 2011 June 28</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2013/11/169022-no-limits-to-watching/fulltext|title=No Limits to Watching?|first1=Katina|last1=Michael|first2=MG|last2=Michael|website=cacm.acm.org|date=November 2013|access-date=2013-11-04|archive-date=2013-11-04|archive-url=https://archive.today/20131104221647/http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2013/11/169022-no-limits-to-watching/fulltext|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>Michael, K. (2015). Sousveillance: Implications for Privacy, Security, Trust, and the Law. Consumer Electronics Magazine, IEEE, 4(2), 92–94.</ref>}} The term, coined by [[Steve Mann (inventor)|Steve Mann]],<ref>Monahan, Torin (2006). ''Surveillance And Security: Technological Politics And Power in Everyday Life'', p. 158. {{ISBN|9780415953931}}.</ref> stems from the contrasting French words ''sur'', meaning "above", and ''sous'', meaning "below", i.e. "[[surveillance]]" denotes the "[[Eye in the sky (camera)|eye in the sky]]" watching from above, whereas "sousveillance" denotes bringing the means of observation down to human level, either physically (by mounting cameras on people rather than on buildings) or hierarchically (with ordinary people observing, rather than by higher authorities or by architectural means).<ref>Course developed by New York based artist [[Joy Garnett]] and taught initially at the City College of New York's Digital and Interdisciplinary Art Practice MFA program (DIAP): "Sousveillance: The Art of Networked Surveillance: Decoding the Social and the Private"[http://newsgrist.typepad.com/diap_sousveiller/]</ref><ref>Fernback, Jan. "Sousveillance: Communities of resistance to the surveillance environment." Telematics and Informatics 30.1 (2013): 11–21.</ref>{{refn|name=defs|

Alternative definitions of both ''sur-'' and ''sous-'' ''veillance'' (the act of watching), in addition to the definition above, include:
* Surveillance is defined as cameras (or other sensors) affixed to property (real-estate, e.g. land, by way of posts or poles, or buildings), whereas sousveillance is defined as cameras (or other sensors) borne by people.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Sousveillance: Inventing and Using Wearable Computing Devices for Data Collection in Surveillance Environments|year=2002|journal=Surveillance & Society|volume=1|issue=3|author1=S. Mann|author2=J. Nolan| author3=B. Wellman. |pages=331–355|doi=10.24908/ss.v1i3.3344|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>K. Michael and M. G. Michael. Sousveillance and point of view
technologies in law enforcement: An overview. 2012.</ref><ref>J. Bradwell and K. Michael. Security workshop brings 'sousveillance'
under the microscope. 2012.</ref><ref>S. Mann.  [http://wearcam.org/veillance/veillance.pdf Veillance and Reciprocal Transparency: Surveillance versus Sousveillance, AR Glass, Lifeglogging, and Wearable Computing] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131202235652/http://wearcam.org/veillance/veillance.pdf |date=2013-12-02 }}.  IEEE ISTAS 2013, pp. 1–12</ref>
* Surveillance is the veillance of the authority (i.e. the veillance that has the capacity to prohibit other veillances), whereas sousveillance is the veillance of plurality (i.e. "crowd veillance" or watching, sensing, or the like, done by non authorities)[4].
* Sousveillance has also been described as "inverse surveillance",<ref name="Sousveillance 2004, pp. 620–627"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37560195/#45421629 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110305130038/http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37560195#45421629 |url-status=dead |archive-date=2011-03-05 |title=MSNBC |publisher=MSNBC |date=2012-06-04 |access-date=2013-11-26}}</ref> based on the word [[surveillance]] (from the [[French language|French]] ''sur'', "from above", and ''veiller'', "to watch"), and substituting the prefix ''sous'', "from below".}}

'''Undersight''' (inverse oversight) is sousveillance at high-level, e.g. "citizen undersight" being reciprocal to a congressional oversight committee or the like.<ref>[http://cacr.uwaterloo.ca/conferences.html CACR] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928182110/http://cacr.uwaterloo.ca/conferences.html |date=2013-09-28 }} (Centre For Applied Cryptographic Research), [http://cacr.uwaterloo.ca/conferences/2001/isw-eighth/announcement.html 8th CACR Information Security Workshop & 2nd Annual Privacy and Security Workshop] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928181854/http://cacr.uwaterloo.ca/conferences/2001/isw-eighth/announcement.html |date=2013-09-28 }}, The Human Face of Privacy Technology, November 1–2, 2001, The University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; [http://cacr.uwaterloo.ca/conferences/2001/isw-eighth/slides/slides.html Slides and recordings.] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928182000/http://cacr.uwaterloo.ca/conferences/2001/isw-eighth/slides/slides.html |date=2013-09-28 }}</ref><ref>"Sousveillance: Wearable Computing and Citizen "Undersight"", h-Plus Magazine, 2009jul10</ref><ref>"When Is "Undersight" Unconstitutional?", Ian Ayres, Yale Law School, ''The New York Times'', January 5, 2011</ref>

'''Inverse surveillance''' is a subset of sousveillance with an emphasis on "watchful vigilance from underneath" and a form of [[surveillance]] inquiry or legal protection involving the recording, monitoring, study, or analysis of surveillance systems, proponents of surveillance, and possibly also recordings of authority figures. Inverse surveillance is typically undertaken by those who are subjected to surveillance, so it can be thought of as a form of [[ethnography]] or [[ethnomethodology]] (i.e. an analysis of the surveilled from the perspective of a participant in a society under surveillance).<ref name=wearcam>{{cite web |url=http://wearcam.org/sousveillance.pdf |title=Sousveillance: Inventing and Using Wearable Computing Devices for Data Collection in Surveillance Environments, Surveillance & Society 1(3): 331–355 |access-date=2013-11-26 |archive-date=2012-10-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121012215522/http://wearcam.org/sousveillance.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> Sousveillance typically involves community-based recording from first person perspectives, without necessarily involving any specific political agenda, whereas inverse surveillance is a form of sousveillance that is typically directed at, or used to collect data to analyze or study, surveillance or its proponents (e.g., the actions of police or protestors at a protest rally).<ref>Sousveillance, direct action and the anti-corporate globalization movement. Elizabeth A. Bradshaw. ''Critical Criminology'', 21(4):447–461, 2013.</ref><ref>Fernback J (2013) Telematics and Informatics 30(1): 11–21</ref><ref>Reilly P (2013) Every little helps? YouTube, sousveillance and the 'anti-Tesco' riot in Stokes Croft. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 21 November. {{doi|10.1177/1461444813512195}}.</ref>

== Inverse surveillance ==
Inverse surveillance is a type of sousveillance. The more general concept of sousveillance goes beyond just inverse surveillance and the associated twentieth-century political "us ''versus'' them" framework for citizens to photograph [[police]],  shoppers to photograph shopkeepers, or passengers to photograph taxicab drivers. [[Howard Rheingold]] commented in his book ''[[Smart Mobs]]'' that this is similar to the pedestrian−driver concept, i.e. these are roles that many of us take both sides on, from time to time. Many aspects of sousveillance were examined in the general category of "reciprocal accountability" in David Brin's 1997 non-fiction book The Transparent Society, and also in Brin's novels. The first ''International Workshop on Inverse Surveillance'', IWIS, took place in 2004,<ref>IWIS Website, http://wearcam.org/iwis/ {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040806160037/http://wearcam.org/iwis/ |date=2004-08-06 }}</ref> chaired by Dr. Jim Gemmell, ([[MyLifeBits]]), [[Joi Ito]], [[Anastasios Venetsanopoulos]], and [[Steve Mann (inventor)|Steve Mann]], among others. 

Some research has explored why the perpetrators of surveillance are suspicious of sousveillance.<ref name=wearcam/> 

[[Copwatch]] is a network of [[United States|American]] and [[Canadians|Canadian]] volunteer organizations that "police the police." Copwatch groups usually engage in monitoring of the police, videotaping police activity, and educating the public about police misconduct. Fitwatch is a group that photograph [[Forward Intelligence Team]]s (police photographers) in the United Kingdom.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8010098.stm When all video all] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090422160256/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8010098.stm |date=2009-04-22 }} Finlo Rohrer, BBC News Magazine April 21, 2009</ref>

In 2008, [[Cambridge]] researchers (in the MESSAGE project) teamed with bicycle couriers to measure and transmit air pollution indicators as they travel the city.<ref>[https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13130-cyclists-cellphones-help-monitor-air-pollution.html Cyclists' cellphones help monitor air pollution] Tom Simonite, New Scientist, January 2, 2008 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080516204712/http://technology.newscientist.com/article/dn13130-cyclists-cellphones-help-monitor-air-pollution.html |date=May 16, 2008 }}</ref>

In 2012 the Danish daily newspaper and online title [[Dagbladet Information]] [[crowdmapping|crowdmapped]] the positions of surveillance cameras by encouraging readers to use a free Android and iOS app to photograph and geolocate [[CCTV]] cameras.<ref>{{cite news|title=Crowdmapping Denmark's CCTV cameras|url=https://www.journalism.co.uk/news/data-journalism-crowdmapping-denmark-s-cctv-cameras/s2/a550761/|access-date=6 January 2017|date=12 October 2012|archive-date=12 August 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220812224009/https://www.journalism.co.uk/news/data-journalism-crowdmapping-denmark-s-cctv-cameras/s2/a550761/|url-status=live}}</ref>{{Better source needed|date=January 2017}}

== Other types of sousveillance ==
"Hierarchical sousveillance" refers, for example, to citizens photographing the police, shoppers photographing shopkeepers, or taxicab passengers photographing cab drivers.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Moitroux |first=Pola Catherine |title=Countermovement to Constant Surveillance: A Combined Study Examining Acceptance and Motivation Factors Leading People to Engage in Different Forms of Sousveillance |journal=BDM Master Thesis |pages=1–72}}</ref> 

The unanticipated [[2013 Russian meteor event]] was well documented from a dozen angles via the use of dashcam devices.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ghosttheory.com/2013/02/19/russian-dash-cam-craze |title=Russian Dash Cam Craze |publisher=Ghost Theory |date=2013-02-19 |access-date=2013-11-26}}</ref> Similarly, in February 2015, dashcams caught valuable footage of the crash of [[TransAsia Airways]] Flight GE235.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/transasia-airways-flight-ge235-taiwan-plane-crash-caught-by-dashcam-1.2944464 |title= TransAsia Airways Flight GE235: Taiwan plane crash caught by dashcam |publisher=Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |access-date=2015-03-04|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20230228221013/https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/transasia-airways-flight-ge235-taiwan-plane-crash-caught-by-dashcam-1.2944464|archive-date=February 28, 2023}}{{title missing|date=May 2022}}</ref>

==Alibi sousveillance==
Alibi sousveillance is a form of sousveillance activity aimed at generating an [[alibi]] as evidence to defend against allegations of wrongdoing.<ref>"Sousveillance: Wearable Computing and Citizen "Undersight"", by: Steve Mann, [http://hplusmagazine.com/2009/07/10/sousveillance-wearable-computing-and-citizen-undersight/ hplus magazine] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110717184324/http://hplusmagazine.com/2009/07/10/sousveillance-wearable-computing-and-citizen-undersight/ |date=2011-07-17 }}, Published: July 10, 2009</ref>

[[Hasan Elahi]], a [[University of Maryland]] professor, has produced a sousveillance for his entire life, after being detained at an airport because he was erroneously placed on the [[Terrorist Screening Database|US terrorist watchlist]]. Some of his sousveillance activities include using his cell phone as a [[tracking device]], and publicly posting [[debit card]] and other transactions that document his actions.<ref>{{cite magazine|author=Clive Thompson |url=https://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/15-06/ps_transparency/ |date=May 2007 |magazine=Wired |title=The Visible Man: An FBI Target Puts His Whole Life Online |access-date=2013-11-26 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130913190505/http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/15-06/ps_transparency |archive-date=September 13, 2013}}</ref>

=== Police use ===
One specific use of alibi sousveillance is the growing trend of [[Body worn video (police equipment)|police officers wearing body cameras]] while on patrol. Well-publicized events involving police-citizen altercations (such as the case of [[Ferguson unrest|Michael Brown]] in Ferguson, Missouri) have increased calls for police to wear body cameras and so capture evidence of the incidents, for their benefit and  the criminal justice system as a whole.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last=Nunes |first=Iesha S. |year=2015 |title=Hands up, Don't Shoot: Police Misconduct and the Need for Body Cameras |url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uflr67&div=47&g_sent=1&collection=journals |url-status=live |journal=Florida Law Review |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250207103323/https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uflr67&div=47&g_sent=1&collection=journals |archive-date=2025-02-07 |access-date=2025-05-11}}</ref> By having officers use sousveillance, police forces can generate hours of video evidence to be used in cases like that of Michael Brown, and the video evidence can act as an important alibi in the judicial proceedings in regards to who is truly at fault.<ref name=":0" /> Regardless of the outcome of such events, contemporaneous audio-video evidence can be extremely valuable in respect of compliance- and enforcement-related events.

[[Body worn video (police equipment)|Use of wearable cameras by police officers]] combined with video streaming and recording in an archive may produce a record of the interactions of the officer with civilians and criminals. Experiments with police use in [[Rialto, California]] from 2012 to 2013 resulted in a reduction of both complaints against officers and a reduction in the use of violence by officers. According to Jay Stanley, a senior policy analyst at the American Civil Liberties Union, "the public is shielded from police misconduct and the police officer from bogus complaints."<ref name="NYT4613">{{cite news |author=Randall Stross |date=April 6, 2013 |title=Wearing a Badge, and a Video Camera |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/07/business/wearable-video-cameras-for-police-officers.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230929200348/https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/07/business/wearable-video-cameras-for-police-officers.html |archive-date=September 29, 2023 |access-date=April 7, 2013 |newspaper=The New York Times}}</ref>{{Dubious|date=September 2025|reason=Over a decade of history since that claim has conclusively shown that body camera usage does not shield the public from police misconduct, prompting widespread social unrest and protests in the United States in particular. We have a section further down on the page discussing this in context of Eric Garner's murder at the hands of police.}}

Because these body cameras are turned on for every encounter with the public, privacy issues have been brought up with specific emphasis on special victim cases such as rape or domestic violence.{{Citation needed|date=September 2025}}  Police{{Which|date=September 2025}} worry that with a camera right in front of the victim, they will not feel comfortable revealing all the information that they know.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-body-cameras-20140927-story.html|title=Growing use of police body cameras raises privacy concerns|last=Pearce|first=Matt|date=September 27, 2014|work=Los Angeles Times}}</ref>  There have been two case studies done in the United States that have revealed that police officers who have cameras have fewer encounters with citizens than officers who do not have cameras, due to fear of being reprimanded for committing a mistake.<ref name=":0" />

== Sousveillance cultures ==
Prior to contemporary sousveillance cultures, [[Simone Browne]] (2015) used "dark sousveillance" to refer to the ways that enslaved Black Americans refashioned techniques and technologies to facilitate survival and escape. Browne (2015) notes how pranks and other performative practices and creative acts were used to resist enslavement from experiential insight.

In the era of web-based participatory media and convergence cultures, non-governmental and non-state actors, with their own virtual communities and networks that cut across national borders, use what Bakir (2010)<ref>Bakir, V. Sousveillance, Media and Strategic Political Communication: Iraq, USA, UK. Continuum: New York (2010). Available at: http://www.bloomsbury.com/us/sousveillance-media-and-strategic-political-communication-9780826430083/</ref> calls the sousveillant assemblage to wield [[discursive power]]. 

The sousveillant assemblage comprises Haggerty & Ericson's (2000)<ref>Haggerty, K.D. & Ericson, R.V. (2000). The surveillant assemblage.  British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 605–622.</ref> surveillant assemblage (or loosely linked, unstable, systems of data flows of people's activities, tracked by computers, and data-mined so that we are each reconfigured as (security) risks or (commercial) opportunities, but data-fattened by the proliferation of web-based participatory media and personal sousveillance that we willingly provide online). Verde Garrido (2015) has also explored [[Steve Mann (inventor)|Mann]]'s concept of sousveillance and reinterpreted [[Michel Foucault]]'s notion of [[parrhesia]] (i.e., confronting authority and power with the truth) to explain that in contemporary societies, which are global and digital, 'parrhesiastic sousveillance' allows to resist and contest social, economic, and political relations of power by means of technology. 

These acts of resistance and contestation, in turn, enable civil societies to change old meanings and offer new ones, using a newborn digital agency to create new and contemporary politics of truth.<ref>Verde Garrido, M. (2015). Contesting biopolitics of information and communications: The importance of truth and sousveillance after Snowden. Surveillance & Society, 13(2), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v13i2.5331 {{free access}}</ref> Mann has long maintained that the 'informal nature of sousveillance, with its tendency to distribute recordings widely, will often expose inappropriate use to scrutiny, whereas the secret nature of surveillance will tend to prevent misuse from coming to light' (Mann, 2005, p.&nbsp;641).<ref>Mann S. (2005). Sousveillance and cyberglogs. A 30-year empirical voyage through ethical, legal and policy issues. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14(6), 625–646.</ref> 

Just as Foucault's Panopticon operates through potential or implied surveillance, sousveillance might also operate through the credible threat of its existence. As the ubiquity and awareness of sousveillance widen, it is this that may most empower citizens – by making officials realise that their actions may, themselves, be monitored and exposed at any time.{{Citation needed|date=September 2025}} 

There have not been many case studies that have taken place in implementing police body cameras.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Will the widespread use of police body cameras improve police accountability?|last=Scheindlin|first=Shira A.|publisher=Peter K. Manning|year=2015|pages=24–27}}</ref> This means that police worn body cameras have not been proven as a definite method to solve the problem of police brutality.<ref name=":1">{{Cite news|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/12/do-police-body-cameras-work-ferguson/383323/|title=Do Police Body Cameras Actually Work?|last=Friedman|first=Uri|date=December 3, 2014|via=The Atlantic|archive-date=September 24, 2017|access-date=March 11, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170924184549/https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/12/do-police-body-cameras-work-ferguson/383323/|url-status=live}}</ref>  Studies have also shown that people, both policemen and civilians, act differently when they are aware that they are being surveilled on camera.<ref name=":1" />   

== Sousveillance efficiency or efficacy ==
Social media, when used as an output modality in conjunction with sousveillance as an input modality, is called "swollag", or [[gallows]] spelled backwards.<ref>Mann, Steve, and Joseph Ferenbok. "New media and the power politics of sousveillance in a surveillance-dominated world." Surveillance & Society 11, no. 1/2 (2013): 18.</ref><ref>Holland, Janet, ed. Wearable Technology and Mobile Innovations for Next-Generation Education. IGI Global, 2016.  Page 115, in Chapter 6, Wearable Cameras, Alessio Drivet, University of Turin, Italy</ref><ref>Mehdi Khosrow-Pour, DBA; Steve Clarke; Murray E. Jennex; Annie Becker; and Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko, Wearable Technologies: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, IGI Publishing Hershey, PA, USA 2018, Page 509, {{ISBN|9781522554844}}</ref> For example, filming or streaming an abusive situation, like police abuse, doesn't always lead to justice and punishment of the abuser without some means (i.e. swollag) for sousveillance to take effect.{{Citation needed|date=September 2025}} In 2014, [[Eric Garner]] was choked to death by a police officer in Staten Island after being arrested on suspicion of selling loose cigarettes. According to the MIT Technology Review:  <blockquote>"Garner's death was documented by his friend Ramsey Orta, and the video was widely disseminated. Despite the video evidence, a grand jury declined to indict Garner's killer, leading to widespread outrage and protest. (In an ironic twist, the only person indicted in connection with Garner's death was Orta, who came under police scrutiny and was arrested on an "unrelated" weapons possession charge. Orta is now in prison in New York. Sousveillance is not without its costs.)"<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601878/why-we-must-continue-to-turn-the-camera-on-police/|title=How citizen surveillance could reform a broken American police system|last=Zuckerman|first=Ethan|work=MIT Technology Review|access-date=2018-03-18|language=en|archive-date=2018-11-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181109033447/https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601878/why-we-must-continue-to-turn-the-camera-on-police/|url-status=live}}</ref></blockquote>

During French demonstrations against the "Loi Travail" in 2016, a Periscope stream showing authority forces, called abusive by one part of the demonstrators{{Which|date=September 2025}}, was watched by 93,362 people.<ref>{{Cite book|title=La sousveillance. Vers un renseignement ordinaire ?|last=Alloing|first=Camille|publisher=Hermès|year=2016|pages=68–76}}</ref>  In January 2018, c-Now was tested in [[Nice]] by the mayor [[Christian Estrosi]], sparking virulent public debates, with security advocates reporting spyware associated with the app.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.numerama.com/politique/322446-application-reporty-la-mairie-de-nice-va-demander-le-retrait-des-mouchards-dans-son-application.html|title=Application Reporty : la Mairie de Nice va demander le retrait des mouchards dans son application – Politique – Numerama|last=Durand|first=Corentin|date=2018-01-18|work=Numerama|access-date=2018-03-19|language=fr-FR}}</ref> 

== See also ==
* [[Body camera]]
* [[Eyetap]]
* [[Helmet camera]]
* [[Lifelogging]]
* [[Memoto]]
* [[Quantified self]]
* ''[[Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?]]''
* [[Surveillance capitalism]]
* [[Copwatch]]

== References ==
<!-- this 'empty' section displays references defined elsewhere -->
{{reflist|2}}

[[Category:Surveillance]]
[[Category:Technology in society]]
[[Category:Civil disobedience]]
[[Category:Culture jamming techniques]]