View source for Space colonization

{{Short description|Concept of permanent human habitation outside of Earth}}
{{for-multi|hypothetical large-scale space settlements|Space settlement|contemporary habitation modules|Space habitat (facility)}}
{{Use American English|date=November 2023}}

[[File:Buzz salutes the U.S. Flag.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Photo of the [[Lunar Flag Assembly|first national flag assembled by a human on the Moon]] ([[Apollo 11]], 1969). With colonization of space having been a critically discussed issue since the dawn of the [[space age]], resulting in the [[Outer Space Treaty]] (1967), the flag was not to symbolize any territorial claims.<ref name="Smith 2019">{{cite web | last=Smith | first=Kiona N. | title=How Apollo 11 Raised The Flag on the Moon, And What It Means Today | website=Forbes | date=20 July 2019 | url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/kionasmith/2019/07/20/how-apollo-11-raised-the-flag-on-the-moon-and-what-it-means-today/ | access-date=16 September 2021}}</ref>]]
{{Spaceflight sidebar}}

'''Space colonization''' (or '''extraterrestrial colonization''') is the [[human settlement|settlement]] or [[colonization]] of [[outer space]] and [[astronomical bodies]]. The concept in its broad sense has been applied to any permanent human presence in space, such as a [[space habitat]] or other [[extraterrestrial settlement]]s.<ref name="Nye"/> It may involve a process of occupation or control for exploitation, such as [[Space mining|extraterrestrial mining]].

Making territorial claims in space is prohibited by international [[space law]], defining space as a [[Common heritage of humanity|common heritage]]. International space law has had the goal to prevent colonial claims and [[militarization of space]],<ref name="Collis 2009 pp. 47–65"/><ref name="Wilson Center 2021"/> and has advocated the installation of international regimes to regulate access to and sharing of space, particularly for specific locations such as the limited space of [[Geostationary orbit#Orbital allocation|geostationary orbit]]<ref name="Collis 2009 pp. 47–65"/> or the Moon. To date, no permanent space settlement other than temporary [[Space habitat (facility)|space habitats]] have been established, nor has any extraterrestrial territory or [[Extraterrestrial real estate|land been internationally claimed]]. Currently there are also no plans for building a space colony by any government. However, many proposals, speculations, and designs, particularly for extraterrestrial settlements have been made through the years, and a considerable number of space colonization [[space advocacy|advocates]] and groups are active. Currently, the dominant private launch provider [[SpaceX]], has been the most prominent organization [[SpaceX Mars colonization program|planning space colonization on Mars]], though having not reached a development stage beyond launch and landing systems.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Lagatta |first=Eric |title=Elon Musk says human could reach Mars in 4 years after uncrewed SpaceX Starship trips |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/09/09/spacex-launch-mars-elon-musk-starship/75145498007/ |date=9 September 2024 |access-date=2 October 2024|website=USA Today |language=en-US}}</ref>

Space colonization raises numerous socio-political questions. Many arguments for and against space settlement have been made. The two most common reasons in favor of colonization are the [[Space and survival|survival of humans and life]] independent of Earth, making humans a [[multiplanetary species]],<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Chon-Torres |first1=Octavio Alfonso |last2=Murga-Moreno |first2=César Andreé |date=October 2021 |title=Conceptual discussion around the notion of the human being as an inter and multiplanetary species |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1473550421000197/type/journal_article |journal=International Journal of Astrobiology |language=en |volume=20 |issue=5 |pages=327–331 |doi=10.1017/S1473550421000197 |bibcode=2021IJAsB..20..327C |issn=1473-5504|url-access=subscription }}</ref> in the event of a [[Global catastrophic risk|planetary-scale disaster (natural or human-made)]], and the [[commercial use of space]] particularly for enabling a more sustainable expansion of human society through the availability of additional resources in space, reducing environmental damage on and exploitation of Earth.<ref name="o168">{{cite journal | last=Calanchi | first=Alessandra | title=De-colonizing the Earth to Re-enact Colonialism on Mars | journal=Iperstoria | issue=22 | date=21 December 2023 | doi=10.13136/2281-4582/2023.I22.1373 | page=}}</ref> The most common objections include concerns that the [[commodification]] of the cosmos may be likely to continue pre-existing detrimental processes such as [[environmental degradation]], [[economic inequality]] and [[war]]s, enhancing the interests of the already powerful, and at the cost of investing in solving existing major environmental and [[social issue]]s.<ref name="marshall"/><ref>{{Cite book|last=Deudney|first=Daniel|title=Dark Skies: Space Expansionism, Planetary Geopolitics, and the Ends of Humanity|date=2020|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-009024-1|language=en|oclc=1145940182|author-link=Daniel Deudney}}</ref><ref name="Dickens-MR-2010-11">{{cite book |last1=Dickens |first1=Peter |url=http://monthlyreview.org/2010/11/01/the-humanization-of-the-cosmos-to-what-end/ |title=The Humanization of the Cosmos – to What End? |last2=Ormrod |first2=James |date=November 2010 |publisher=[[Monthly Review]] |access-date=3 October 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161003183108/http://monthlyreview.org/2010/11/01/the-humanization-of-the-cosmos-to-what-end/ |archive-date=3 October 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref>

The mere construction of an extraterrestrial settlement, with the needed infrastructure, presents daunting technological, economic and social challenges. Space settlements are generally conceived as providing for nearly all (or all) the needs of larger numbers of humans. The environment in space is [[Effect of spaceflight on the human body|very hostile]] to human life and not readily accessible, particularly for maintenance and supply. It would involve much advancement of currently primitive technologies, such as [[controlled ecological life-support system]]s. With the high cost of [[orbital spaceflight]] (around $1400 per kg, or $640 per pound, to [[low Earth orbit]] by SpaceX [[Falcon Heavy]]), a space settlement would currently be massively expensive, but ongoing progress in [[reusable launch system]]s aim to change that (possibly reaching $20 per kg to orbit),<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/rockets/a7446/elon-musk-on-spacexs-reusable-rocket-plans-6653023/|title=Elon Musk on SpaceX's Reusable Rocket Plans|first=Rand |last=Simberg |date=7 February 2012|access-date=13 June 2015 |website=Popular Mechanics|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170624061845/http://www.popularmechanics.com/space/rockets/a7446/elon-musk-on-spacexs-reusable-rocket-plans-6653023/|archive-date=24 June 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> and in creating [[Space manufacturing|automated manufacturing and construction techniques]].

==Definition==
Space colonization has been in a broad sense referred to as space settlement, space humanization or space habitation.<ref name="q305">{{cite journal | title=Space Colonization for Human Habitation in Space Environment | first=
Shreya |last=Mane| journal=International Journal of Enhanced Research in Science, Technology & Engineering |issn=2319-7463|volume=11 |issue=5|date=7 May 2022| url=https://www.erpublications.com/uploaded_files/download/shreya-mane_GcMQi.pdf | access-date=28 December 2024}}</ref> Space colonization in a narrow sense refers to [[space settlement]]s, as envisioned by [[Gerard K. O'Neill]].<ref name="v307">{{cite web | title=Evolutionary Significance of Space Colonization | website=[[Sylvia Engdahl]], Author of Science Fiction Novels - Official Site | url=https://sylviaengdahl.com/space/thesis.htm | access-date=28 December 2024}}</ref> It is characterized by elements such as: settlement and exploitation,<ref name="w750">{{cite journal | last=Mane | first=Shreya | title=Moon Colonization for Human civilization: Theoretical Overview | journal=Environmental Science and Engineering | volume=1 | issue=1 | date=1 May 2022 | doi=10.46632/ese/1/1/8 | doi-access=free | pages=30–34}}</ref> as well as territorial claim.<ref name="q065">{{cite web | last=Dinerman | first=Taylor | title=Independent space colonization: questions and implications | website=The Space Review | date=15 January 2007 | url=https://www.thespacereview.com/article/784/1 | access-date=28 December 2024}}</ref>

The concept in its broad sense has been applied to any permanent human presence, even robotic,<ref name="f830">{{cite journal | last=Lerner | first=Eric J. | title=Crossroads in space: Humanization: Man or machine? | journal=IEEE Spectrum | volume=20 | issue=9 | date=1983 | issn=0018-9235 | doi=10.1109/MSPEC.1983.6501447 | pages=28–30 | bibcode=1983IEEES..20i..28L }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.fastcompany.com/1653562/japan-robots-moon-base-robonaut-nasa-jaxa-lunar-rockets-constellation|title=Japan vs. NASA in the Next Space Race: Lunar Robonauts|first=Kit |last=Eaton |work=Fast Company|date=28 May 2010|access-date=12 June 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://sservi.nasa.gov/articles/japan-plans-2-billion-robot-moon-base-by-2020/|title=Solar System Exploration Research|access-date=11 August 2017}}</ref> particularly along with the term "settlement", being imprecisely applied to any human [[space habitat (facility)|space habitat]], from [[research station]]s to [[space habitat|self-sustaining communities in space]].<ref name="Nye"/>

The words [[colony]] and [[colonization]] are terms rooted in [[colonial history]] on Earth, making them [[human geography|human geographic]] as well as particularly political terms. This broad use for any permanent human activity and development in space has been criticized, particularly as [[colonialism|colonialist]] and undifferentiated (see below [[#Objections|Objections]]).<ref name="Nye">{{cite web|url=https://www.space.com/bill-nye-space-settlement-not-colonization.html|first=Mike |last=Wall|date=25 October 2019|title=Bill Nye: It's Space Settlement, Not Colonization|website=[[Space.com]]|access-date=26 November 2020}}</ref>

In this sense, a colony is a settlement that claims territory and [[Exploitation of natural resources|exploits]] it for the [[settler]]s or their [[metropole]]. Therefore, a [[human outpost]], while possibly a space habitat or even a [[space settlement]], does not automatically constitute a space colony.<ref name="Bartels 2018">{{cite web | last=Bartels | first=Meghan | title=People are calling for a movement to decolonize space-here's why | website=Newsweek | date=25 May 2018 | url=https://www.newsweek.com/should-we-colonize-space-some-people-argue-we-need-decolonize-it-instead-945130 | access-date=31 October 2021 |quote="[[Robert Zubrin]], said that the one word he shies away from is colony, preferring settlement because the first "confuses the issue with imperialism.""}}</ref>

Therefore, any basing can be part of colonization, while colonization can be understood as a process that is open to more claims, beyond basing. The [[International Space Station]], the longest-occupied extraterrestrial habitat thus far, does not claim territory and thus is not usually considered a colony.<ref>{{cite web|title=International Space Station legal framework |url=https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/International_Space_Station/International_Space_Station_legal_framework |website=ESA |access-date=19 April 2025}}</ref>

[[Moriba Jah]] has criticized existing approaches to orbital space as colonialist, such as for satellites, on the grounds that it involves claiming ownership instead of collaborative stewardship.<ref name="x785">{{cite web | last=Jah | first=Moriba | title=Occupation, even in orbit, is colonialism | website=Aerospace America | date=1 November 2023 | url=https://aerospaceamerica.aiaa.org/departments/occupation-even-in-orbit-is-colonialism/ | access-date=13 September 2024}}</ref>

Some advocates of peaceful human settlement of space have argued against use of the word "colony" and related terms, so as to avoid confusing their goals with [[colonialism]] on Earth.<ref name="Nye"/>

==History==

In the first half of the 17th century [[John Wilkins]] suggested in ''A Discourse Concerning a New Planet'' that future adventurers like [[Francis Drake]] and [[Christopher Columbus]] might reach the Moon and allow people to live there.<ref>{{cite web |author=Haskins |first=Caroline |date=14 August 2018 |title=The Racist Language of Space Exploration |url=https://theoutline.com/post/5809/the-racist-language-of-space-exploration?zd=3&zi=v4x73sgl |access-date=1 November 2020}}</ref> The first known work on space colonization was the 1869 novella ''[[The Brick Moon]]'' by [[Edward Everett Hale]], about an inhabited artificial satellite.<ref>{{cite journal |first=E. E. |last=Hale |title=[[The Brick Moon]] |journal=Atlantic Monthly |volume=24 |date=1869}}</ref> In 1897, [[Kurd Lasswitz]] also wrote about space colonies. The Russian rocket science pioneer [[Konstantin Tsiolkovsky]] foresaw elements of the space community in his book ''Beyond Planet Earth'' written about 1900. Tsiolkovsky imagined his space travelers building greenhouses and raising crops in space.<ref>K. E. Tsiolkovsky. ''Beyond Planet Earth''. Trans. by Kenneth Syers. Oxford, 1960.</ref> Tsiolkovsky believed that going into space would help perfect human beings, leading to immortality and peace.<ref name="bio">[http://www.informatics.org/museum/tsiol.html The life of Konstantin Eduardovitch Tsiolkovsky 1857–1935], {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120615044125/http://www.informatics.org/museum/tsiol.html|date=15 June 2012}}.</ref> One of the first to speak about space colonization was [[Cecil Rhodes]] who in 1902 spoke about "these stars that you see overhead at night, these vast worlds which we can never reach", adding "I would annex the planets if I could; I often think of that. It makes me sad to see them so clear and yet so far".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Pop |first1=Virgiliu |title=Who Owns the Moon? Extraterrestrial Aspects of Land and Mineral Resources Ownership |date=2008 |volume=4 |publisher=Springer |page=13 |doi=10.1007/978-1-4020-9135-3 |isbn=978-1-4020-9134-6 |url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4020-9135-3|access-date=20 April 2025}}</ref> In the 1920s [[John Desmond Bernal]], [[Hermann Oberth]], [[Guido von Pirquet]] and [[Herman Noordung]] further developed the idea. [[Wernher von Braun]] contributed his ideas in a 1952 ''Colliers'' magazine article. In the 1950s and 1960s, [[Dandridge M. Cole]]<ref>{{cite book |first1=Dandridge M. |last1=Cole |first2=Donald W. |last2=Cox |title=Islands in Space:The Challenge of the Planetoids |url=https://www.amazon.com/Islands-Space-Planetoids-Dandridge-Cole/dp/B0007DZSR0|publisher=Chilton |date=1964|access-date=17 April 2025}}</ref> published his ideas. 

When orbital spaceflight was achieved in the 1950s [[colonialism]] was still a strong international project, e.g. easing the United States to advance [[United States space program|its space program]] and space in general as part of a "[[New Frontier]]".<ref name="marshall"/> As the [[Space Age]] was developing, [[decolonization]] gained again in force, producing many newly [[independence|independent]] countries. These newly independent countries confronted spacefaring countries, demanding an anti-colonial stance and regulation of space activity when [[space law]] was raised and negotiated internationally. Fears of confrontations because of [[land grab]]s and an [[arms race]] [[Militarization of space|in space]] between the few countries with spaceflight capabilities grew and were ultimately shared by the spacefaring countries themselves.<ref name="Wilson Center 2021">{{cite web | title=The Global Legal Landscape of Space: Who Writes the Rules on the Final Frontier? | website=Wilson Center |first1=Sophie |last1=Goguichvili |first2=Alan |last2=Linenberger |first3=Amber |last3=Gillette |first4=Alexandra |last4=Novak |date=1 October 2021| url=https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/global-legal-landscape-space-who-writes-rules-final-frontier | access-date=14 October 2022}}</ref> This produced the wording of the agreed on international space law, starting with the [[Outer Space Treaty]] of 1967, calling space a "[[common heritage of humanity|province of all mankind]]" and securing provisions for international regulation and sharing of outer space.

The advent of [[geostationary satellite]]s raised the case of limited space in outer space. In the 1960s and with an initial focus on communications spectrum management, the international community agreed to regulate the assignment of slots in the geosynchronous (GEO) belt through the [[International Telecommunication Union|International Telecommunication Union (ITU)]]. Today, any company or nation planning to launch a satellite to GEO must apply to the ITU for an orbital slot.<ref>{{cite report|title=Orbital Slots for Everyone?|first=Joseph W. |last=Gangestad |date=March 2017 |url=https://aerospace.org/sites/default/files/2018-05/OrbitalSlots_0.pdf |publisher=The Aerospace Corporation|access-date=20 April 2025}}</ref> A group of [[equator]]ial countries, all of which were countries that were once colonies of colonial empires, but without spaceflight capabilities, signed in 1976 the [[Bogota Declaration]]. These countries declared that [[geostationary orbit]] is a limited natural resource and belongs to the equatorial countries directly below, seeing it not as part of outer space, humanity's [[Commons|common]]. Through this, the declaration challenged the dominance of geostationary orbit by spacefaring countries through identifying their dominance as imperialistic.<ref name="Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 2017">{{cite web | title=The Bogotá Declaration: A Case Study on Sovereignty, Empire, and the Commons in Outer Space |first=Haris A. |last=Durrani |website=Columbia Journal of Transnational Law | date=5 December 2017 | url=http://jtl.columbia.edu/the-bogota-declaration-a-case-study-on-sovereignty-empire-and-the-commons-in-outer-space/ | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200121062356/http://jtl.columbia.edu/the-bogota-declaration-a-case-study-on-sovereignty-empire-and-the-commons-in-outer-space/ | archive-date=21 January 2020 | url-status=dead | access-date=15 October 2022}}</ref><ref name="Biondi 2018">{{cite web |last=Biondi |first=Charleyne |date=21 January 2018 |title=Haris A. Durrani – The Bogotá Declaration: A Global Uprising? – Uprising 13/13 |url=https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/uprising1313/haris-a-durrani-the-bogota-declaration-a-global-uprising/ |access-date=15 October 2022 |website=Log In ‹ Blogs @ Columbia Law School}}</ref><ref name="Collis 2009 pp. 47–65">{{cite journal | last=Collis | first=Christy | title=The Geostationary Orbit: A Critical Legal Geography of Space's Most Valuable Real Estate | journal=The Sociological Review | publisher=SAGE Publications | volume=57 | issue=1_suppl | year=2009 | issn=0038-0261 | doi=10.1111/j.1467-954x.2009.01816.x | pages=47–65| s2cid=127857448 }}</ref> 

Writers continued to address space colonization concepts by publishing books in the mid-1970s such as ''The High Frontier: Human Colonies in Space'' by [[Gerard K. O'Neill]]<ref name="ONeill-1977">{{cite book|first=Gerard K. |last=O'Neill |title=The High Frontier: Human Colonies in Space |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=f7emAAAAIAAJ |publisher=Anchor Books|date=1977|isbn=978-0-385-18232-4 |access-date=17 April 2025}}</ref> and ''Colonies in Space'' by [[T. A. Heppenheimer]].<ref>{{cite book|first=T. A. |last=Heppenheimer |title=Colonies in Space |url=https://nss.org/colonies-in-space-by-t-a-heppenheimer/ |publisher=Stackpole Books |via=National Space Society|date=1977 |access-date=16 April 2025}}</ref>

In 1975, the first international joint space mission occurred as a symbol of the policy of détente that the two superpowers were pursuing at the time. The U.S. Apollo and Soviet Soyuz spacecraft docked in earth orbit for almost two days.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.mannedspaceops.org/missions/apollo-soyuz/|title=Apollo Soyuz Program Summary|website=mannedspaceops.org|access-date=20 April 2025}}</ref> In 1977, the first sustained space habitat, the [[Salyut 6]] station, was put into Earth's orbit. Eventually the first space stations were succeeded by the [[ISS]], today's largest [[human outpost]] in space and closest to a space settlement. Built and operated under a multilateral regime, it has become a blueprint for future stations, such as [[Lunar Gateway|around]] and possibly [[Moonbase|on the Moon]].<ref name="Foust 2018">{{cite web | last=Foust | first=Jeff | title=Is the Gateway the right way to the moon? | website=SpaceNews | date=25 December 2018 | url=https://spacenews.com/is-the-gateway-the-right-way-to-the-moon/ | access-date=15 October 2022}}</ref><ref name="ESA Blog Navigator – Navigator page for active ESA blogs 2016">{{cite web | title=Moon Village: A vision for global cooperation and Space 4.0 – Jan Wörner's blog | website=ESA Blog Navigator – Navigator page for active ESA blogs | date=23 November 2016 | url=https://blogs.esa.int/janwoerner/2016/11/23/moon-village/ | access-date=15 October 2022}}</ref>

Additional discourse on living in space was generated by writers including [[Marianne J. Dyson]] who wrote ''Home on the Moon; Living on a Space Frontier'' in 2003;<ref>{{cite book |first=Marianne J. |last=Dyson |title=Living on a Space Frontier |publisher=National Geographic |date=2003 |isbn=0792271939 }}</ref> Peter Eckart wrote ''Lunar Base Handbook'' in 2006<ref>{{cite book |first=Peter |last=Eckart |title=Lunar Base Handbook|publisher=McGraw-Hill |date=2006 |isbn=0072401710 }}</ref> and then [[Harrison Schmitt]]'s ''Return to the Moon'' written in 2007.<ref>{{cite book|first=Harrison H. |last=Schmitt |title=Return to the Moon - Exploration, Enterprise, and Energy in the Human Settlement of Space |publisher=Springer |date=2007|isbn=978-0-387-31064-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IerrQGC6S2YC |access-date=18 April 2025}}</ref>

An international regime for lunar activity was demanded by the international [[Moon Treaty]], but is currently developed multilaterally as with the [[Artemis Accords]].<ref name="The Space Review 2020">{{cite web |date=29 June 2020 |title=The Artemis Accords: repeating the mistakes of the Age of Exploration |url=https://www.thespacereview.com/article/3975/1 |first=Dennis |last=O’Brien |access-date=14 October 2022 |website=The Space Review}}</ref> Threats to existing treaties come in areas such as [[space debris]] because of the lack of regulation on disposition of assets by operators (and controlling sovereign power) once their mission is complete. The only habitation on a different celestial body so far have been the temporary habitats of the crewed [[lunar lander]]s. Similar to the Artemis program, China is leading an effort to develop a lunar base called the [[International Lunar Research Station]] beginning in the 2030s.

==Justification and opposition to space colonization==
===Justification===
====Survival of human civilization====
{{Main|Space and survival}}

A primary argument calling for space colonization is the long-term survival of human civilization and terrestrial life.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Piper|first=Kelsey|date=22 October 2018|title=Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk want to colonize space to save humanity|url=https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2018/10/22/17991736/jeff-bezos-elon-musk-colonizing-mars-moon-space-blue-origin-spacex|access-date=2 April 2021|website=Vox|language=en}}</ref> By developing alternative locations off Earth, the planet's species, including humans, could live on in the event of [[Global catastrophic risk|natural or human-made disasters on Earth]].<ref>{{cite book |last=Kaku |first=Michio |author-link=Michio Kaku |title=The Future of Humanity: Terraforming Mars, Interstellar Travel, Immortality, and Our Destiny Beyond Earth |publisher=Doubleday |year=2018 |isbn=978-0385542760 |pages=3–6 |quote=It is as inescapable as the laws of physics that humanity will one day confront some type of [[extinction]]-level [[Extinction event|event]]. ... [W]e face threats [that include] [[global warming]] ... [[Biological warfare|weaponized microbes]] ... [[Quaternary glaciation|the onset of another ice age]] ... the possibility that [[Yellowstone Caldera|the supervolcano under Yellowstone National Park]] may awaken from its long slumber ... [and] another [[Impact event|meteor or cometary impact]] . ... [from one of the] several thousand [[Near-Earth object|NEOs (near-Earth objects)]] that cross the orbit of the Earth. ... Life is too precious to be placed on a single planet . ... Perhaps our fate is to become a multiplanet species that lives [[Interstellar travel|among the stars]].}}</ref>

On two occasions, theoretical physicist and cosmologist [[Stephen Hawking]] argued for space colonization as a means of saving humanity. In 2001, Hawking predicted that the human race would become extinct within the next thousand years unless colonies could be established in space.<ref>{{cite news |last=Highfield |first=Roger |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1359562/Colonies-in-space-may-be-only-hope-says-Hawking.html |title=Colonies in space may be only hope, says Hawking |work=The Telegraph |date=16 October 2001 |access-date=5 August 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090426232042/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1359562/Colonies-in-space-may-be-only-hope-says-Hawking.html |archive-date=26 April 2009 |url-status=live}}</ref> In 2010, he stated that humanity faces two options: either we colonize space within the next two hundred years, or we will face the long-term prospect of [[Human extinction|extinction]].<ref>{{cite news|agency=Press Association|date=9 August 2010|title=Stephen Hawking: mankind must colonise space or die out |first=Stephen|last=Hawking|language=en-GB|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/aug/09/stephen-hawking-human-race-colonise-space|access-date=20 June 2020|issn=0261-3077}}</ref>

In 2005, then [[NASA]] Administrator [[Michael D. Griffin|Michael Griffin]] identified space colonization as the ultimate goal of current spaceflight programs, saying:
{{blockquote|...&nbsp;the goal isn't just scientific exploration&nbsp;... it's also about extending the range of human habitat out from Earth into the solar system as we go forward in time&nbsp;... In the long run, a single-planet species will not survive&nbsp;... If we humans want to survive for hundreds of thousands of millions of years, we must ultimately populate other planets. Now, today the technology is such that this is barely conceivable. We're in the infancy of it.&nbsp;... I'm talking about that one day, I don't know when that day is, but there will be more human beings who live off the Earth than on it. We may well have people living on the Moon. We may have people living on the moons of Jupiter and other planets. We may have people making habitats on asteroids&nbsp;... I know that humans will colonize the solar system and one day go beyond.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/23/AR2005092301691.html| title=NASA's Griffin: 'Humans Will Colonize the Solar System'| date=25 September 2005| newspaper=Washington Post| page=B07| access-date=14 September 2017| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604141654/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/23/AR2005092301691.html| archive-date=4 June 2011| url-status=live}}</ref>|sign=|source=}}

[[Louis J. Halle Jr.]], formerly of the [[United States Department of State]], wrote in ''[[Foreign Affairs]]'' (Summer 1980) that the colonization of space will protect humanity in the event of global [[nuclear warfare]].<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.foreignaffairs.org/19800601faessay8146/louis-j-halle/a-hopeful-future-for-mankind.html |title=A Hopeful Future for Mankind |first=Louis J. |last=Halle |journal=Foreign Affairs |date=Summer 1980 |doi=10.2307/20040585 |volume=58 |issue=5 |pages=1129–36 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041013051342/http://www.foreignaffairs.org/19800601faessay8146/louis-j-halle/a-hopeful-future-for-mankind.html |archive-date=13 October 2004 |jstor=20040585|url-access=subscription }}</ref> The physicist [[Paul Davies]] also supports the view that if a planetary catastrophe threatens the survival of the human species on Earth, a self-sufficient colony could "reverse-colonize" Earth and restore [[Civilization|human civilization]]. The author and journalist [[William E. Burrows]] and the biochemist [[Robert Shapiro (chemist)|Robert Shapiro]] proposed a private project, the [[Alliance to Rescue Civilization]], with the goal of establishing an off-Earth "[[backup]]" of human civilization.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/01/science/01arc.html |title=Life After Earth: Imagining Survival Beyond This Terra Firma |newspaper=The New York Times |first=Richard |last=Morgan |date=1 August 2006 |access-date=23 May 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090417023904/http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/01/science/01arc.html |archive-date=17 April 2009 |url-status=live}}</ref>

Based on his [[Copernican principle]], [[J. Richard Gott]] has estimated that the human race could survive for another 7.8&nbsp;million years, but it is not likely to ever colonize other planets. However, he expressed a hope to be proven wrong, because "colonizing other worlds is our best chance to hedge our bets and improve the survival prospects of our species".<ref>{{cite news |last=Tierney |first=John |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/17/science/17tier.html?ex=1342324800&en=ccf375ae9f268470&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss |title=A Survival Imperative for Space Colonization |date=17 July 2007 |work=The New York Times |access-date=23 February 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170629081936/http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/17/science/17tier.html?ex=1342324800&en=ccf375ae9f268470&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss |archive-date=29 June 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref>

In a theoretical study from 2019, a group of researchers have pondered the long-term trajectory of human civilization.<ref name=sb01>{{cite journal |last=Baum |first=Seth D. |author-link=Seth Baum |display-authors=etal |date=2019 |title=Long-Term Trajectories of Human Civilization |url=http://gcrinstitute.org/papers/trajectories.pdf |journal=Foresight |volume=21 |issue=1 |location=Bingley |publisher=Emerald Group Publishing |doi=10.1108/FS-04-2018-0037 |pages=53–83 |s2cid=52042667 |access-date=23 September 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200102042937/http://gcrinstitute.org/papers/trajectories.pdf |archive-date=2 January 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> It is argued that due to Earth's finitude as well as the [[Formation and evolution of the Solar System#The Sun and planetary environments|limited duration of the Solar System]], mankind's survival into the far future will very likely require extensive space colonization.<ref name=sb01/>{{rp|8, 22f}} This 'astronomical trajectory' of mankind, as it is termed, could come about in four steps: First step, space colonies could be established at various habitable locations — be it in outer space or on [[Astronomical object|celestial bodies]] away from Earth – and allowed to remain temporarily dependent on support from Earth. In the second step, these colonies could gradually become self-sufficient, enabling them to survive if or when the mother civilization on Earth fails or dies. Third step, the colonies could develop and expand their habitation by themselves on their [[space station]]s or celestial bodies, for example via [[terraforming]]. In the fourth step, the colonies could self-replicate and establish new colonies further into space, a process that could then repeat itself and continue at an [[Exponential growth|exponential rate]] throughout the cosmos. However, this astronomical trajectory may not be a lasting one, as it will most likely be interrupted and eventually decline due to resource depletion or straining competition between various human factions, bringing about some 'star wars' scenario.<ref name=sb01/>{{rp|23–25}}

====Vast resources in space====
{{See also | Steady-state economy #Pushing some of the terrestrial limits into outer space }}
Resources in space, both in materials and energy, are enormous. The [[Solar System]] has enough material and energy to support anywhere from several thousand to over a billion times that of the current Earth-based human population, mostly from the Sun itself.<ref name=ONeill-1977/>{{rp|9|q=Estimated 3000 times the land area of Earth}}<ref>Estimated 10 quadrillion (10<sup>16</sup>) people. Lewis, John S. (1997). ''[[Mining the Sky|Mining the Sky: Untold Riches from the Asteroids, Comets, and Planets]].'' Helix Books/Addison-Wesley. {{ISBN|0-201-32819-4}} version 3.</ref><ref>Estimated 5 quintillion (5 x 10<sup>18</sup>) people. Savage, Marshall (1992, 1994). ''[[The Millennial Project: Colonizing the Galaxy in Eight Easy Steps]].'' Little, Brown. {{ISBN|0-316-77163-5}}.</ref>

Asteroid mining will likely be a key player in space colonization. Water and materials to make structures and shielding can be easily found in asteroids. Instead of resupplying on Earth, mining and fuel stations need to be established on asteroids to facilitate better space travel.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/spacetech/niac/2017_Phase_I_Phase_II/Sustainable_Human_Exploration |title=Optical Mining of Asteroids, Moons, and Planets to Enable Sustainable Human Exploration and Space Industrialization |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200304024010/https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/spacetech/niac/2017_Phase_I_Phase_II/Sustainable_Human_Exploration/|archive-date=4 March 2020 |date=6 April 2017 |website=NASA |first=Joel |last=Sercel}}</ref> Optical mining is the term NASA uses to describe extracting materials from asteroids. NASA believes by using propellant derived from asteroids for exploration to the moon, Mars, and beyond will save $100&nbsp;billion. If funding and technology come sooner than estimated, asteroid mining might be possible within a decade.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucedorminey/2016/05/24/how-to-optically-mine-water-from-an-asteroid/#37f0e05c389f |title=Turning Near-Earth Asteroids Into Strategically-Placed Fuel Dumps |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170918065620/https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucedorminey/2016/05/24/how-to-optically-mine-water-from-an-asteroid/#37f0e05c389f|archive-date=18 September 2017 |date=May 24, 2016 |website=Forbes|first=Bruce |last=Dorminey}}</ref>

Although some items of the infrastructure requirements above can already be easily produced on Earth and would therefore not be very valuable as trade items (oxygen, water, base metal ores, silicates, etc.), other high-value items are more abundant, more easily produced, of higher quality, or can only be produced in space. These could provide (over the long-term) a high return on the initial investment in space infrastructure.<ref>{{cite journal|first=Mark J. |last=Sonter |url=http://www.spacefuture.com/archive/the_technical_and_economic_feasibility_of_mining_the_near_earth_asteriods.shtml |title=The Technical and Economic Feasibility of Mining the Near-Earth Asteroids |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080815034645/http://www.spacefuture.com/archive/the_technical_and_economic_feasibility_of_mining_the_near_earth_asteriods.shtml|archive-date=15 August 2008 |journal=49th IAF Congress |date=28 September – 2 October 1998 |location=Melbourne, Australia}}</ref>

Some of these high-value trade goods include precious metals,<ref name="members.nova.org">[http://members.nova.org/~sol/station/ast-mine.htm Asteroid Mining], {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080512000822/http://members.nova.org/~sol/station/ast-mine.htm|date=12 May 2008}}. Sol Station.</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Whitehouse|first=David|title=Gold rush in space?|publisher=BBC|date=22 July 1999|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/401227.stm|access-date=2009-05-25|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080307111033/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/401227.stm|archive-date=7 March 2008|url-status=live}}</ref> gemstones,<ref>{{cite web|title=Two groups look at the economic viability of mining asteroids |first=Bob |last=Yirka |date=23 October 2023 |url=https://phys.org/news/2023-10-groups-economic-viability-asteroids.html|website=phys.org|access-date=18 April 2025}}</ref> power,<ref>Makoto Nagatomo, Susumu Sasaki and Yoshihiro Naruo. [http://www.spacefuture.com/archive/conceptual_study_of_a_solar_power_satellite_sps_2000.shtml Conceptual Study of A Solar Power Satellite, SPS 2000], {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080725171510/http://spacefuture.com/archive/conceptual_study_of_a_solar_power_satellite_sps_2000.shtml|date=25 July 2008}}, Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Space Technology and Science, Yokohama, Japan, May 1994, pp.&nbsp;469–476 Paper No. ISTS-94-e-04 – Space Future.</ref> solar cells,<ref name="panix.com">[http://www.panix.com/~kingdon/space/manuf.html Space Manufacturing], {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080904234210/http://www.panix.com/~kingdon/space/manuf.html|date=4 September 2008}} – Jim Kingdon's space markets page.</ref> ball bearings,<ref name="panix.com"/> semi-conductors,<ref name="panix.com"/> and pharmaceuticals.<ref name="panix.com"/>

The mining and extraction of metals from a small asteroid the size of [[3554 Amun]] or [[(6178) 1986 DA]], both small near-Earth asteroids, may yield 30 times as much metal as humans have mined throughout history. A metal asteroid this size would be worth approximately US$20&nbsp;trillion at 2001 market prices.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://spacenews.com/national-space-society-applauds-nasa-asteroid-capture-plan/|title=National Space Society Applauds NASA Asteroid Capture Plan|date=11 April 2013|language=en-US|access-date=20 April 2025|website=Space News}}</ref>

The main impediments to commercial exploitation of these resources are the very high cost of initial investment,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Lee|first=Ricky J.|title=Costing and financing a commercial asteroid mining venture|journal=54th International Astronautical Congress|location=Bremen, Germany|year=2003|id=IAC-03-IAA.3.1.06|url=http://www.aiaa.org/content.cfm?pageid=406&gTable=Paper&gID=16257|access-date=25 May 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090809183150/http://www.aiaa.org/content.cfm?pageid=406&gTable=Paper&gID=16257|archive-date=9 August 2009}}</ref> the very long period required for the expected return on those investments (''The Eros Project'' plans a 50-year development),<ref>[http://www.orbdev.com/erosproj.html The Eros Project], {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080705103530/http://www.orbdev.com/erosproj.html|date=5 July 2008}} – Orbital Development.</ref> and the fact that the venture has never been carried out before—the high-risk nature of the investment.

====Expansion with fewer negative consequences====
{{Further|Holocene extinction}}

Expansion of humans and technological progress has usually resulted in some form of environmental devastation, and destruction of [[ecosystem]]s and their accompanying [[wildlife]]. In the past, expansion has often come at the expense of displacing many [[indigenous peoples]], the resulting treatment of these peoples ranging anywhere from encroachment to genocide. Because space has no known life, this need not be a consequence, as some space settlement advocates have pointed out.<ref>{{Cite news| url=http://www.space-settlement-institute.org/meaning.html| title=The Meaning of Space Settlement| publisher=Space Settlement Institute| access-date=5 September 2014| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141003151529/http://www.space-settlement-institute.org/meaning.html| archive-date=3 October 2014| url-status=live}}</ref><ref>Savage, Marshall (1992, 1994). ''[[The Millennial Project: Colonizing the Galaxy in Eight Easy Steps]]''. Little, Brown. {{ISBN|0-316-77163-5}}</ref> However, on some bodies of the Solar System, there is the potential for extant native lifeforms and so the negative consequences of space colonization cannot be dismissed.<ref>See for example, the work of Dr. Alan Marshall in Alan Marshall (1993) '[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-5930.1993.tb00078.x Ethics and the Extraterrestrial Environment]', ''Journal of Applied Philosophy'', Vol. 10, No 2, pp227-237; Alan Marshall (1994) 'Martians Beware', ''New Zealand Science Monthly'', December 1994 issue; Alan Marshall (1997) 'Extraterrestrial Environmentalism', ''Australian Science'', Vol. 18, No. 2, Winter issue, pp. 25–27. July 1997; and "Cosmic Preservationist", The Word: ''[https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg17723765-100-the-word-cosmic-preservationist/ New Scientist],'' January 4th, 2003 issue.</ref>

Counterarguments state that changing only the location but not the logic of exploitation will not create a more sustainable future.<ref name="Yun">{{cite web |first=Joon |last=Yun |website=Worth.com |title=The Problem With Today's Ideas About Space Exploration. |date=2 January 2020 
|url=https://www.worth.com/is-space-the-next-frontier-for-the-same-old-story-of-imperialism/ |access-date=28 June 2020}}</ref>

====Alleviating overpopulation and resource demand====
An argument for space colonization is to mitigate proposed impacts of [[Human overpopulation|overpopulation of Earth]], such as [[resource depletion]].<ref>{{Cite journal|date=1 January 1976|title=The impact of space colonization on world dynamics|journal=Technological Forecasting and Social Change|language=en|volume=9|issue=4|pages=361–99|doi=10.1016/0040-1625(76)90019-6|issn=0040-1625|last1=Vajk|first1=J.Peter}}</ref> If the resources of space were opened to use and viable life-supporting habitats were built, Earth would no longer define the limitations of growth. Although many of Earth's resources are non-renewable, off-planet colonies could satisfy the majority of the planet's resource requirements. With the availability of extraterrestrial resources, demand on terrestrial ones would decline.<ref name="ONeill-1977"/><ref>{{cite book|first=Jerry|last= Pournelle |title=A Step Farther Out |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vcQWZFu2t4kC|publisher=Ace|date=1979 |access-date=16 April 2025}}</ref> Proponents of this idea include [[Stephen Hawking]]<ref>{{Cite web|date=17 August 2014|title=Stephen Hawking: mankind must move to outer space within a century - Telegraph|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/7935505/Stephen-Hawking-mankind-must-move-to-outer-space-within-a-century.html|access-date=9 August 2021|first=Richard |last=Alleyne |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140817025438/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/7935505/Stephen-Hawking-mankind-must-move-to-outer-space-within-a-century.html|archive-date=17 August 2014}}</ref> and [[Gerard K. O'Neill]].<ref name="ONeill-1977"/>

Others including cosmologist [[Carl Sagan]] and science fiction writers [[Arthur C. Clarke]],<ref name="clarkebipeds">{{cite book|title=Greetings, Carbon-Based Bipeds!|date=1999 |first=Arthur C. |last=Clarke |publisher=Voyager |isbn=0-00-224698-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GbNi8Si_O4UC|access-date=18 April 2025}}</ref> and [[Isaac Asimov]],<ref>''The Good Earth Is Dying'' (1971), [[Isaac Asimov]], (published in ''[[Der Spiegel]]'').</ref> have argued that shipping any excess population into space is not a viable solution to human overpopulation. According to Clarke, "the population battle must be fought or won here on Earth".<ref name = clarkebipeds/> The problem for these authors is not the lack of resources in space (as shown in books such as ''[[Mining the Sky]]''<ref name="Lewis-1996">{{cite book |title=Mining the Sky: Untold Riches from the Asteroids, Comets, and Planets |date=1996 |first=John S.|last=Lewis |publisher=Helix Book |isbn=0-201-47959-1}}</ref>), but the physical impracticality of shipping vast numbers of people into space to "solve" overpopulation on Earth.

====Other arguments====
Advocates for space colonization cite a presumed innate human drive to explore and discover, and call it a quality at the core of progress and thriving civilizations.<ref>{{cite book |last=Clarke |first=Arthur C. |title= Profiles of the Future: An Inquiry Into the Limits of the Possible |chapter-url= https://archive.org/details/profilesoffuture00clar |chapter-url-access= registration |year= 1962 |chapter= Rocket to the Renaissance}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url= http://www.spacedaily.com/news/oped-03y.html | title= The Space Settlement Summit | last= McKnight |first=John Carter | publisher= Space Daily | date= 20 March 2003 | access-date= 12 March 2013 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130514103953/http://www.spacedaily.com/news/oped-03y.html | archive-date= 14 May 2013 | url-status= live }}</ref>

[[Nick Bostrom]] has argued that from a [[utilitarianism|utilitarian]] perspective, space colonization should be a chief goal as it would enable a very large population to live for a very long time (possibly billions of years), which would produce an enormous amount of utility (or happiness).<ref>{{cite journal |url= http://www.nickbostrom.com/astronomical/waste.html |title= Astronomical Waste: The Opportunity Cost of Delayed Technological Development |journal= Utilitas |volume= 15 |number= 3 |date= November 2003 |pages= 308–14 |doi= 10.1017/S0953820800004076 |last1= Bostrom |first1= Nick |citeseerx= 10.1.1.429.2849 |s2cid= 15860897 |access-date=20 October 2009 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140409031022/http://www.nickbostrom.com/astronomical/waste.html |archive-date=9 April 2014|url-status= live }}</ref> He claims that it is more important to reduce existential risks to increase the probability of eventual colonization than to accelerate technological development so that space colonization could happen sooner. In his paper, he assumes that the created lives will have positive ethical value despite the problem of [[suffering]].

In a 2001 interview with Freeman Dyson, J.&nbsp;Richard Gott and Sid Goldstein, they were asked for reasons why some humans should live in space.<ref name="dyson">{{cite web |last=Britt |first=Robert Roy |date=8 October 2001 |title=Stephen Hawking: Humanity Must Colonize Space to Survive |url=http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/colonize_why_011008-1.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101125083046/http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/colonize_why_011008-1.html |archive-date=25 November 2010 |access-date=28 July 2006|website=space.com}}.</ref> Their answers were:
* Spread life and beauty throughout the universe
* Ensure the survival of our species
* Make money through new forms of [[Commercialization of space|space commercialization]] such as [[space-based solar power|solar-power satellites]], [[asteroid mining]], and [[space manufacturing]]
* Save the [[environment (biophysical)|environment]] of Earth by moving people and industry into space
Biotic ethics is a branch of ethics that values life itself. For biotic ethics, and their extension to space as panbiotic ethics, it is a human purpose to secure and propagate life and to use space to maximize life.

=== Opposition ===
Space colonization has been seen as a relief to the problem of [[human overpopulation]] as early as 1758,<ref name = tsr2009>{{cite news|url=https://www.thespacereview.com/article/1296/1 |title=Planetary demographics and space colonization |first=Nader |last=Elhefnawy |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160513062857/http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1296/1 |archive-date=13 May 2016 |publisher=The Space Review |date=2 February 2009}}</ref><!--would be best if the original article that Otto Diederich Lutken published were put here--> and listed as one of Stephen Hawking's reasons for pursuing space exploration.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/7935505/Stephen-Hawking-mankind-must-move-to-outer-space-within-a-century.html|title=Stephen Hawking: mankind must move to outer space within a century|date=9 August 2010 |last1=Alleyne |first1=Richard |access-date=5 April 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180423144633/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/7935505/Stephen-Hawking-mankind-must-move-to-outer-space-within-a-century.html|archive-date=23 April 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref> Critics note, however, that a slowdown in population growth rates since the 1980s has alleviated the risk of overpopulation.<ref name = tsr2009/>

Critics also argue that the costs of commercial activity in space are too high to be profitable against Earth-based industries, and hence that it is unlikely to see significant exploitation of space resources in the foreseeable future.<ref name="Marshall">
{{cite journal |last=Marshall |first=P. |year=1981 |title=Nicole Oresme on the Nature, Reflection, and Speed of Light |journal=[[Isis (journal)|Isis]] |volume=72 |issue=3 |pages=357–374 [367–374] |doi=10.1086/352787 |s2cid=144035661}}</ref>

Other objections include concerns that the forthcoming colonization and [[commodification]] of the cosmos is likely to enhance the interests of the already powerful, including major economic and military institutions e.g. the large financial institutions, the major aerospace companies and the [[military–industrial complex]], to lead to new [[war]]s, and to exacerbate pre-existing exploitation of [[Exploitation of labour|workers]] and [[Exploitation of natural resources|resources]], [[economic inequality]], [[poverty]], [[social division]] and [[Social exclusion|marginalization]], environmental degradation, and other detrimental processes or institutions.<ref name="Dickens-MR-2010-11" /><ref name="Dickens-MR-2008-02">{{cite web |last=Dickens |first=Peter |date=1 February 2008 |url=https://monthlyreview.org/2008/02/01/who-really-won-the-space-race/ |title=Who Really Won the Space Race? |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161003104456/http://monthlyreview.org/2008/02/01/who-really-won-the-space-race/|archive-date=3 October 2016 |website=Monthly Review|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Dickens-MR-2017-03">{{cite web |last=Dickens |first=Pet|date=1 March 2017 |url=https://monthlyreview.org/2017/03/01/astronauts-at-work/ |title=Astronauts at Work: The Social Relations of Space Travel |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170328200150/https://monthlyreview.org/2017/03/01/astronauts-at-work/|archive-date=28 March 2017 |website=Monthly Review|url-status=live}}</ref>

Additional concerns include creating a culture in which humans are no longer seen as human, but rather as material assets. The issues of [[human dignity]], [[morality]], [[philosophy]], [[culture]], [[bioethics]], and the threat of megalomaniac leaders in these new "societies" would all have to be addressed in order for space colonization to meet the [[psychological]] and [[Group (sociology)|social]] needs of people living in isolated colonies.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://er.jsc.nasa.gov/seh/sociology.html |title=Sociology and Space Development |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080628172018/http://er.jsc.nasa.gov/seh/sociology.html|archive-date=28 June 2008 |first=B. J. |last=Bluth |website=California State University Northridge}}</ref>

As an alternative or addendum for the future of the human race, many science fiction writers have focused on the realm of the 'inner-space', that is the computer-aided exploration of the [[human mind]] and human [[consciousness]]—possibly en route developmentally to a [[Matrioshka Brain]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://curiosity.com/topics/a-matrioshka-brain-is-a-computer-the-size-of-a-solar-system-curiosity/|title=A Matrioshka Brain Is A Computer The Size of a Solar System|website=curiosity.com|access-date=14 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180814040151/https://curiosity.com/topics/a-matrioshka-brain-is-a-computer-the-size-of-a-solar-system-curiosity/|archive-date=14 August 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>

[[Robotic spacecraft]] are proposed as an alternative to gain many of the same scientific advantages without the limited mission duration and high cost of life support and return transportation involved in human missions.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/report/robotic-planetary-exploration/|title=Robotic Exploration of the Solar System|work=Scientific American|access-date=14 August 2018|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180814040634/https://www.scientificamerican.com/report/robotic-planetary-exploration/|archive-date=14 August 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref>

A corollary to the [[Fermi paradox]]—"nobody else is doing it"<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/06/26/no-we-cannot-know-whether-humans-are-alone-in-the-universe/|title=No, We Haven't Solved The Drake Equation, The Fermi Paradox, Or Whether Humans Are Alone|last=Siegel|first=Ethan|work=Forbes|access-date=14 August 2018|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180814041251/https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/06/26/no-we-cannot-know-whether-humans-are-alone-in-the-universe/|archive-date=14 August 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>—is the argument that, because no evidence of [[Fermi paradox#Empirical evidence|alien colonization technology]] exists, it is statistically unlikely to even be possible to use that same level of technology ourselves.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/why-aliens-have-not-contacted-humans-2015-9|title=The likeliest reasons why we haven't contacted aliens are deeply unsettling |first=Kelly |last=Dickerson|work=Business Insider|access-date=14 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180814040227/https://www.businessinsider.com/why-aliens-have-not-contacted-humans-2015-9|archive-date=14 August 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>

====Colonialism====
{{See also|Manifest destiny|Space advocacy#Decolonizing space|Space ethics|Ethics of terraforming|Planetary chauvinism}}
[[File:Gemini5insignia.png|thumb|upright=0.6|[[Gemini 5]] mission badge (1965) connecting spaceflight to colonial endeavours<ref name="Roger Launiuss Blog 2011">{{cite web | author=[[Roger Launius|Launius, Roger]]| title=Reconsidering the Foundations of Human Spaceflight in the 1950s | website=Roger Launius's Blog | date=8 June 2011 | url=https://launiusr.wordpress.com/2011/06/08/reconsidering-the-foundations-of-human-spaceflight-in-the-1950s/ | access-date=6 September 2021}}</ref>]]

[[Image:NASA Artemis Gateway logo.png|thumb|upright=0.6|The logo and name of the [[Lunar Gateway]] references the [[St. Louis]] [[Gateway Arch]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.space.com/nasa-lunar-gateway-moon-station-logo.html|title=NASA Reveals New Gateway Logo for Artemis Lunar Orbit Way Station|website=Space.com|date=18 September 2019|access-date=28 June 2020|first=Robert Z. |last=Pearlman}}</ref> which some see as associating Mars with the [[American frontier]] and the ''[[manifest destiny]]'' mentality of [[Settler colonialism#Settler colonialism in the United States|American settler colonialism]].<ref name="NPR.org 2015">{{cite web | title=As Gateway Arch Turns 50, Its Message Gets Reframed |first=Camille |last=Phillips | website=NPR.org | date=28 October 2015 | url=https://www.npr.org/2015/10/28/452299164/as-gateway-arch-turns-50-its-message-gets-reframed | access-date=27 June 2022}}</ref>]]

Space colonization has been discussed as [[postcolonialism|postcolonial]]<ref name="Durrani 2019">{{cite magazine | last=Durrani | first=Haris | title=Is Spaceflight Colonialism? | website=The Nation | date=19 July 2019 | url=https://www.thenation.com/article/world/apollo-space-lunar-rockets-colonialism/ | access-date=2 October 2020}}</ref> continuation of [[imperialism]] and [[colonialism]],<ref>{{cite news |last=Cornish |first=Gabrielle |date=22 July 2019 |title=How imperialism shaped the race to the moon |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/07/22/how-imperialism-shaped-race-moon/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190723032005/https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/07/22/how-imperialism-shaped-race-moon/ |archive-date=23 July 2019 |access-date=19 September 2019 |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |language=en}}</ref><ref name="Haskins"/><ref name="Drake2018"/><ref name="marshall"/> calling for [[decolonization]] instead of colonization.<ref name="Bartels 2018h"/><ref name="Drake2018"/> Critics argue that the present politico-legal regimes and their philosophic grounding, advantage imperialist development of space,<ref name="marshall">{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/0265-9646(95)93233-B |title=Development and imperialism in space |first=Alan |last=Marshall |date=February 1995 |journal=Space Policy |pages=41–52 |access-date=28 June 2020 |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/026596469593233B |volume=11|issue=1 |bibcode=1995SpPol..11...41M|url-access=subscription }}</ref> that key decisionmakers in space colonization are often wealthy elites affiliated with private corporations, and that space colonization would primarily appeal to their peers rather than ordinary citizens.<ref name="DNLee"/><ref>{{cite web|title=Against Mars-a-Lago: Why SpaceX's Mars colonization plan should terrify you|url=https://www.salon.com/2017/10/08/against-mars-a-lago-why-spacexs-mars-colonization-plan-should-terrify-you/|website=Salon.com|access-date=20 September 2019|date=8 October 2017|first=Keith A. |last=Spencer|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190919201220/https://www.salon.com/2017/10/08/against-mars-a-lago-why-spacexs-mars-colonization-plan-should-terrify-you/|archive-date=19 September 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> Furthermore, it is argued that there is a need for inclusive<ref>{{cite web |last=Zevallos |first=Zuleyka |date=26 March 2015 |title=Rethinking the Narrative of Mars Colonisation |url=https://othersociologist.com/2015/03/26/rethinking-the-narrative-of-mars-colonisation/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191211122431/https://othersociologist.com/2015/03/26/rethinking-the-narrative-of-mars-colonisation/ |archive-date=11 December 2019 |access-date=20 September 2019 |website=Other Sociologist |language=en}}</ref> and democratic participation and implementation of any space exploration, infrastructure or habitation.<ref name="Tavares Buckner Burton McKaig 2020">{{cite arXiv | last1=Tavares | first1=Frank | last2=Buckner | first2=Denise | last3=Burton | first3=Dana | last4=McKaig | first4=Jordan | last5=Prem | first5=Parvathy | last6=Ravanis | first6=Eleni | last7=Trevino | first7=Natalie | last8=Venkatesan | first8=Aparna | last9=Vance | first9=Steven D. | last10=Vidaurri | first10=Monica | last11=Walkowicz | first11=Lucianne | last12=Wilhelm | first12=Mary Beth | title=Ethical Exploration and the Role of Planetary Protection in Disrupting Colonial Practices | date=15 October 2020 | class=astro-ph.IM | eprint =2010.08344v2}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Spencer |first=Keith A. |date=2 May 2017 |title=Keep the Red Planet Red |url=https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/02/mars-elon-musk-space-exploration-nasa-colonization |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191103165331/https://jacobinmag.com/2017/02/mars-elon-musk-space-exploration-nasa-colonization |archive-date=3 November 2019 |access-date=20 September 2019 |website=[[Jacobin (magazine)|Jacobin]] |language=en}}</ref> According to space law expert Michael Dodge, existing [[space law]], such as the [[Outer Space Treaty]], guarantees access to space, but does not enforce social inclusiveness or regulate non-state actors.<ref name="Bartels 2018h">{{cite web | last=Bartels | first=Meghan | title=People are calling for a movement to decolonize space—here's why | website=Newsweek | date=25 May 2018 | url=https://www.newsweek.com/should-we-colonize-space-some-people-argue-we-need-decolonize-it-instead-945130 | access-date=9 November 2021}}</ref>

Particularly the narrative of the "[[New Frontier]]" has been criticized as unreflected continuation of [[settler colonialism]] and [[manifest destiny]], continuing the narrative of exploration as fundamental to the assumed [[human nature]].<ref name="Schaberg 2021">{{cite web | last=Schaberg | first=Christopher | title=We're Already Colonizing Mars | website=Slate Magazine | date=30 March 2021 | url=https://slate.com/technology/2021/03/mars-colonization-is-already-happening.html | access-date=8 September 2021}}</ref><ref name="Renstrom 2021">{{cite web | last=Renstrom | first=Joelle | title=The Troubling Rhetoric of Space Exploration | website=Undark Magazine | date=18 March 2021 | url=https://undark.org/2021/03/18/rhetoric-of-space-exploration/ | access-date=15 August 2021}}</ref><ref name="Haskins">{{cite web|title=The racist language of space exploration|url=https://theoutline.com/post/5809/the-racist-language-of-space-exploration|website=The Outline|access-date=20 September 2019|date=14 August 2018|first=Caroline |last=Haskins|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191016235916/https://theoutline.com/post/5809/the-racist-language-of-space-exploration|archive-date=16 October 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="DNLee">{{cite web |last=Lee |first=D. N. |date=26 March 2015 |title=When discussing Humanity's next move to space, the language we use matters |url=https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/urban-scientist/when-discussing-humanity-8217-s-next-move-to-space-the-language-we-use-matters/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190914011756/https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/urban-scientist/when-discussing-humanity-8217-s-next-move-to-space-the-language-we-use-matters/ |archive-date=14 September 2019 |access-date=20 September 2019 |website=[[Scientific American]] |language=en}}</ref><ref name="Drake2018">{{cite web|date=9 November 2018|title=We need to change the way we talk about space exploration|first=Nadia|last=Drake|author-link=Nadia Drake|publisher=[[National Geographic]]|access-date=19 October 2019 |url=https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/we-need-to-change-way-we-talk-about-space-exploration-mars|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191016235826/https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2018/11/we-need-to-change-way-we-talk-about-space-exploration-mars/|archive-date=16 October 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> Joon Yun considers [[Space and survival|space colonization as a solution to human survival]] and global problems like pollution to be imperialist;<ref>{{cite web |last=Yun |first=Joon |date=2 January 2020 |title=The Problem With Today's Ideas About Space Exploration. |url=https://www.worth.com/is-space-the-next-frontier-for-the-same-old-story-of-imperialism/ |access-date=28 June 2020 |website=Worth.com}}</ref> others have identified space as a new [[sacrifice zone]] of colonialism.<ref name="Calma 2021">{{cite web | last=Calma | first=Justine | title=Jeff Bezos eyes space as a new 'sacrifice zone' | website=The Verge | date=21 July 2021 | url=https://www.theverge.com/2021/7/21/22587249/jeff-bezos-space-pollution-industry-sacrifice-zone-amazon-environmental-justice | access-date=9 November 2021}}</ref>

Furthermore, the understanding of space as empty and separate is considered a continuation of [[terra nullius]].<ref name="w462">{{cite web | title=Astro-Colonialism: Conversation with Willi Lempert | website=Society for Cultural Anthropology | date=26 March 2024 | url=https://culanth.org/fieldsights/astro-colonialism-conversation-with-willi-lempert | access-date=4 January 2025 |first=Hae-Seo |last=Kim}}</ref><ref name="c593">{{cite journal | last1=Mitchell | first1=A. | last2=Wright | first2=S. | last3=Suchet-Pearson | first3=S. | last4=Lloyd | first4=K. | last5=Burarrwanga | first5=L. | last6=Ganambarr | first6=R. | last7=Ganambarr-Stubbs | first7=M. | last8=Ganambarr | first8=B. | last9=Maymuru | first9=D. | last10=Maymuru | first10=R. | title=Dukarr lakarama: Listening to Guwak, talking back to space colonization | journal=Political Geography | publisher=Elsevier BV | volume=81 | year=2020 | issn=0962-6298 | doi=10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102218 | doi-access=free | article-number=102218 | url=https://hal.science/hal-04689795/document | access-date=4 January 2025}}</ref>

Natalie B. Trevino argues that not colonialism but [[decoloniality|coloniality]] will be carried into space if not reflected on.<ref name="Trevino 2021">{{cite thesis | last=Trevino | first=Natalie B | title=The Cosmos is Not Finished |type=PhD dissertation |publisher=University of Western Ontario | date=30 October 2020 | url=https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/7567 | access-date=9 September 2021}}</ref>

More specifically the advocacy for territorial colonization [[Mars colonization|of Mars]] has been called ''surfacism'', in contrast to [[Venus colonization|habitation in the atmospheric space of Venus]],<ref name="Tickle 2015">{{cite web | last=Tickle | first=Glen | title=A Look into Whether Humans Should Try to Colonize Venus Instead of Mars | website=Laughing Squid | date=5 March 2015 | url=https://laughingsquid.com/a-look-into-whether-humans-should-try-to-colonize-venus-instead-of-mars/ | access-date=1 September 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Warmflash |first=David |date=14 March 2017 |title=Colonization of the Venusian Clouds: Is 'Surfacism' Clouding Our Judgement? |url=https://www.visionlearning.com/blog/2017/03/14/colonization-venusian-clouds-surfacism-clouding-judgement/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191211122431/https://www.visionlearning.com/blog/2017/03/14/colonization-venusian-clouds-surfacism-clouding-judgement/ |archive-date=11 December 2019 |access-date=20 September 2019 |website=Vision Learning |language=en}}</ref> a concept similar to [[Thomas Gold]]s ''[[surface chauvinism]]''.

More generally space infrastructure such as the [[Mauna Kea Observatories]] have also been [[Opposition to the Mauna Kea Observatories|criticized and protested against]] as being colonialist.<ref name="Matson Nunn 2021">{{cite web | last1=Matson | first1=Zannah Mae | last2=Nunn | first2=Neil | title=Space Infrastructure, Empire, And The Final Frontier: What The Mauna Kea Land Defenders Teach Us About Colonial Totality | website=Society & Space | date=6 September 2021 | url=https://www.societyandspace.org/articles/space-infrastructure-empire-and-the-final-frontier-what-the-mauna-kea-land-defenders-teach-us-about-colonial-totality | access-date=7 September 2021}}</ref> [[Guiana Space Centre]] has also been the site of anti-colonial protests, connecting colonization as an issue on Earth and in space.<ref name="Durrani 2019"/>

In regard to the scenario of [[first contact (science fiction)|extraterrestrial]] [[first contact (anthropology)|first contact]], it has been argued that the employment of colonial language would endanger such first impressions and encounters.<ref name="Bartels 2018h"/>

Furthermore, spaceflight as a whole and space law more particularly has been criticized as a postcolonial project by being built on a colonial legacy and by not facilitating the sharing of access to space and its benefits, too often allowing spaceflight to be used to sustain colonialism and imperialism, most of all on Earth instead.<ref name="Durrani 2019"/>

====Planetary protection and risk of contamination====

{{see also|Planetary protection}}
Agencies conducting interplanetary missions are guided by [[Committee on Space Research|COSPAR]]'s planetary protection policies, to have at most 300,000 spores on the exterior of the craft—and more thoroughly sterilized if they contact "special regions" containing water, or it could contaminate life-detection experiments or the planet itself.<ref name=groundwatercontamination>[https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-27526981 Queens University Belfast scientist helps NASA Mars project] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181119091228/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-27526981 |date=19 November 2018}} "No-one has yet proved that there is deep groundwater on Mars, but it is plausible as there is certainly surface ice and atmospheric water vapour, so we wouldn't want to contaminate it and make it unusable by the introduction of micro-organisms."</ref><ref>[https://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2012/05/04/COSPAR_Planetary_Protection_Policy_v3-24-11.pdf Cospar Planetary Protection Policy], {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130306111646/https://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2012/05/04/COSPAR_Planetary_Protection_Policy_v3-24-11.pdf|date=6 March 2013}} (20 October 2002; As Amended to 24 March 2011).</ref>

It is impossible to sterilize human missions to this level, as humans are host to typically a hundred trillion [[microorganism]]s of thousands of species of the [[human microbiome]], and these cannot be removed while preserving the life of the human. Containment seems the only option, but it is a major challenge in the event of a hard landing (i.e. crash).<ref name=biospherescollide>{{cite web|url=https://www.nasa.gov/history/history-publications-and-resources/nasa-history-series/when-biospheres-collide/#.U_uVh_mwJcQ |title=When Biospheres Collide – a History of NASA's Planetary Protection Programs |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190714112103/https://www.nasa.gov/connect/ebooks/when_biospheres_collide_detail.html#.U_uVh_mwJcQ |archive-date=14 July 2019 |first=Michael |last=Meltzer |date=31 May 2012 |quote=see Chapter 7, Return to Mars – final section: Should we do away with human missions to sensitive targets|access-date=18 April 2025}}</ref> There have been several planetary workshops on this issue, but with no final guidelines yet for a way forward.<ref>Johnson, James E. [http://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/ppw2015/pdf/1010.pdf "Planetary Protection Knowledge Gaps for Human Extraterrestrial Missions: Goals and Scope." (2015)] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191026125720/https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/ppw2015/pdf/1010.pdf |date=26 October 2019 }}</ref> Human explorers could also inadvertently contaminate Earth if they return to the planet while carrying extraterrestrial microorganisms.<ref>{{cite book |title=Safe on Mars: Precursor Measurements Necessary to Support Human Operations on the Martian Surface |date=2002 |url=https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/10360/safe-on-mars-precursor-measurements-necessary-to-support-human-operations |chapter=Potential Hazards of the Biological Environment (Chapter 5) |publisher=National Academies Press |location=Washington, DC |doi=10.17226/10360 |isbn=978-0-309-08426-0 |access-date=19 April 2025 |quote=Martian biological contamination may occur if astronauts breathe contaminated dust or if they contact material that is introduced into their habitat. If an astronaut becomes contaminated or infected, it is conceivable that he or she could transmit Martian biological entities or even disease to fellow astronauts, or introduce such entities into the biosphere upon returning to Earth. A contaminated vehicle or item of equipment returned to Earth could also be a source of contamination}}</ref>

==Challenges to overcome==
Colonization beyond the Earth involves overcoming a number of difficult challenges.
===Distance from Earth===
The outer planets are much farther from [[Earth]] than the inner planets, and would therefore be harder and more time-consuming to reach. In addition, return voyages may well be prohibitive considering the time and distance. Even communication with Earth would be slow, with delays of 4 - 24 minutes for a message to [[Mars]],<ref>{{Cite web |date=26 February 2024 |title=Communication Delays: The Hidden Challenge of Space Exploration - New Space Economy |url=https://newspaceeconomy.ca/2024/02/26/communication-delays-the-hidden-challenge-of-space-exploration/ |access-date=10 April 2025 |website=newspaceeconomy.ca |language=en-US}}</ref> and 35 - 52 minutes to Jupiter and its moons.<ref>{{Cite web |date=15 August 2023 |title=NASA's Europa Probe Gets a Hotline to Earth |url=https://www.nasa.gov/missions/europa-clipper/nasas-europa-probe-gets-a-hotline-to-earth/ |website=NASA |access-date=19 April 2025 |language=en-US}}</ref>

===Extreme environments===
Extreme cold – due to the distance to the sun, temperatures are near [[absolute zero]] in many parts of the outer Solar System.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0bEMAwAAQBAJ |title=Encyclopedia of the solar system |date=1999 |publisher=Elsevier |location=San Diego |isbn=9780124160347 |first1=Doris |last1=Breuer |first2=Tilman |last2=Spohn |first3=Torrence |last3=Johnson}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Rathbun |first1=J. A. |last2=Spencer |first2=J. R. |last3=Tamppari |first3=L. K. |last4=Martin |first4=T. Z. |last5=Barnard |first5=L. |last6=Travis |first6=L. D. |date=1 May 2004 |title=Mapping of Io's thermal radiation by the Galileo photopolarimeter–radiometer (PPR) instrument |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0019103504000235 |journal=Icarus |series=Special Issue: Io after Galileo |volume=169 |issue=1 |pages=127–139 |doi=10.1016/j.icarus.2003.12.021 |bibcode=2004Icar..169..127R |issn=0019-1035|url-access=subscription }}</ref>

===Sustainable power sources===
Power – [[Solar power]] is many times less concentrated in the outer Solar System than in the inner Solar System. It is unclear as to whether it would be usable there, using some form of concentration mirrors, or whether [[nuclear power]] would be necessary.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Study of Power Options for Jupiter and Outer Planet Missions |first1=Geoffrey A. |last1=Landis |first2=James |last2=Fincannon |url=https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20160004679/downloads/20160004679.pdf |journal=42nd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference |location=New Orleans LA |date=19 June 2015|access-date=18 April 2025}}</ref> Use of geothermal systems to generate power may be practical on some of the planets and moons of the solar system.<ref>{{cite web|title=Geothermal Energy on Solar System Bodies |date=21 December 2022 |first=Ken |last=Wisian |url=https://www.beg.utexas.edu/news/geothermal-energy-on-solar-system-bodies |website = University of Texas |access-date=18 April 2025}}</ref>

===Physical and mental health risks to colonists===
{{main|Effect of spaceflight on the human body}}
The health of the humans who may participate in a colonization venture would be subject to increased physical, mental and emotional risks.
* [[Effect of spaceflight on the human body#Weightlessness|Effects of low gravity on the human body]] – All moons of the gas giants and all outer dwarf planets have a very low gravity, the highest being [[Io (moon)|Io's]] gravity (0.183 g) which is less than 1/5 of the Earth's gravity. Since the [[Apollo program]] all crewed spaceflight has been constrained to low Earth orbit and there has been no opportunity to test the effects of such low gravitational accelerations on the human body. It is speculated (but not confirmed) that the low gravity environments might have very similar effects to long-term exposure in [[weightlessness]]. Such effects might be avoided by [[Artificial gravity#Centripetal force|rotating spacecraft creating artificial gravity]].
* Dust – breathing risks associated with fine dust from rocky surface objects, for similar reasons as [[Lunar soil#Harmful effects of lunar dust|harmful effects of lunar dust]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Dzombak |first=Rebecca |date=14 March 2025 |title=Martian Dust Will Be a Health Hazard for Astronauts |url=https://eos.org/research-spotlights/martian-dust-will-be-a-health-hazard-for-astronauts |access-date=10 April 2025 |website=Eos |language=en-US}}</ref>
* [[NASA]] learned that &ndash; without gravity &ndash; bones lose [[mineral (nutrient)|mineral]]s, causing [[osteoporosis]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-42627341|title=Here's what happens to your body in space|newspaper=BBC News|date=10 January 2018|access-date=9 April 2019 |language=en-GB|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190411152723/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-42627341|archive-date=11 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Bone density]] may decrease by 1% per month,<ref name="nasa-body">{{Cite web|url=http://www.nasa.gov/hrp/bodyinspace|title=The Human Body in Space|last1=Abadie |first1=LJ |last2=Lloyd |first2=CW |last3=Shelhamer |first3=MJ|date=11 June 2018|publisher=NASA|access-date=4 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190726081140/https://www.nasa.gov/hrp/bodyinspace/|archive-date=26 July 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> which may lead to a greater risk of osteoporosis-related fractures later in life. Fluid shifts towards the head may cause vision problems.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Silverman |first=Lauren |date=4 March 2017 |title=Doctor Launches Vision Quest To Help Astronauts' Eyeballs |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/03/04/518214299/doctor-launches-vision-quest-to-help-astronauts-eyeballs |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190305165258/https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/03/04/518214299/doctor-launches-vision-quest-to-help-astronauts-eyeballs |archive-date=5 March 2019 |access-date=7 March 2019 |website=NPR.org}}</ref> 
* NASA found that isolation in closed environments aboard the [[International Space Station]] led to [[Depression (mood)|depression]], [[sleep disorder]]s, and diminished personal interactions, likely due to confined spaces and the monotony and boredom of long space flight.<ref name=nasa-body/><ref>{{Cite web |last=Stuster |first=Jack W. |title=NASA - Behavioral Issues Associated with isolation and Confinement: Review and Analysis of Astronaut Journals |url=https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/991.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190411152721/https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/991.html |archive-date=11 April 2019 |access-date=9 April 2019 |publisher=NASA}}</ref> 
* [[Circadian rhythm]] may also be susceptible to the effects of space life due to the effects on sleep of disrupted timing of sunset and sunrise.<ref name="weir">{{Cite web |last=Weir |first=Kirsten |date=1 June 2018 |title=Mission to Mars |url=https://www.apa.org/monitor/2018/06/mission-mars |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191212130533/https://www.apa.org/monitor/2018/06/mission-mars |archive-date=12 December 2019 |access-date=4 March 2019 |publisher=American Psychological Association |quote=We are a circadian species, and if you don't have the proper lighting to maintain that [[chronobiology]], it can create significant problems for crew members}}</ref> This can lead to exhaustion, as well as other sleep problems such as [[insomnia]], which can reduce their productivity and lead to mental health disorders.<ref name=weir/> High-energy radiation is a health risk that colonists would face, as radiation in deep space is deadlier than what astronauts face now in low Earth orbit. Metal shielding on space vehicles protects against only 25–30% of space radiation, possibly leaving colonists exposed to the other 70% of radiation and its short and long-term health complications.<ref name=":0"/>

==Locations to consider==
Space colonization has been envisioned at many different locations inside and outside the [[Solar System]], but most commonly at Mars and the Moon.

===Near-Earth space===
====Earth orbit====
[[File:Debris-GEO1280.jpg|thumb|alt=Earth from space, surrounded by small white dots|A computer-generated image from 2005 showing the distribution of mostly space debris in [[geocentric orbit]] with two areas of concentration: geostationary orbit and low Earth orbit.]]

[[Geostationary orbit]] was an early issue of discussion about space colonization, with equatorial countries argueing for special rights to the orbit (see [[Bogota Declaration]]).<ref name="Durrani 2019"/>

[[Space debris]], particularly in low Earth orbit, has been characterized as a product of colonization by occupying space and hindering access to space through excessive pollution with debris, with drastic increases in the course of military activity and without a lack of management.<ref name="Durrani 2019"/>

[[File:Axiom modules connected to ISS.jpg|thumb|Through the [[Commercial LEO Destinations program]], the [[Axiom Station]] can gradually establish commercial uses and become economically sustainable.]]

Most of the [[Delta-v budget|delta-''v'' budget]], and thus propellant, of a launch is used bringing a spacecraft to low Earth orbit.<ref name=":3">{{Cite book |last=Wanjek |first=Christopher |title=Spacefarers: how humans will settle the Moon, Mars, and beyond |date=2020 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-98448-6 |location=Cambridge, Massachusetts}}</ref>{{Rp|page=100}} This is the main reason why [[Jerry Pournelle]] said "If you can get your ship into orbit, you're halfway to anywhere".<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Pournelle |first=Jerry P. |date=April 1974 |title=A Step Farther Out, Halfway to Anywhere |url=https://archive.org/details/Galaxy_v34n07_1974-04/page/n95/mode/2up |magazine=[[Galaxy Magazine]] |pages=94}}</ref> Therefore, the main advantages to constructing a [[space settlement]] in Earth orbit are accessibility to the Earth and already-existing economic motives such as [[space hotels]] and [[space manufacturing]]. However, a big disadvantage is that orbit does not host any materials that is available for exploitation. Space colonization altogether might eventually demand lifting vast amounts of payload into orbit, making thousands of daily launches potentially unsustainable. Various theoretical concepts, such as [[orbital ring]]s and [[Skyhook (structure)|skyhooks]], have been proposed to reduce the cost of accessing space.<ref name=":3" />{{Rp|page=|pages=142–147}}

==== Moon ====
{{Main|Colonization of the Moon}}

[[File:Lunar base concept drawing s99 04195.jpg|thumb|Artist's rendering of an envisioned [[Lunar resources#Mining|lunar mining facility]]]]

The [[Moon]] is discussed as a target for colonization, due to its proximity to Earth and lower [[escape velocity]]. The Moon is reachable from Earth in three days, has a near-instant communication to Earth, with minable minerals, no atmosphere, and low gravity, making it extremely easy to ship materials and products to orbit.<ref name=":3" />{{Rp|page=|pages=175}} Abundant [[ice]] is trapped in [[permanently shadowed crater]]s near the poles, which could provide support for the water needs of a lunar colony,<ref>{{cite news | url =http://www.hindu.com/2009/09/23/stories/2009092357770100.htm | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20090926073133/http://www.hindu.com/2009/09/23/stories/2009092357770100.htm | url-status =dead | archive-date =26 September 2009 | title =Water discovered on Moon?: "A lot of it actually" | date =23 September 2009 | newspaper =[[The Hindu]] | access-date =26 September 2009 |first=Divya |last=Gandhi }}</ref> though indications that [[mercury (element)|mercury]] is also similarly trapped there may pose health concerns.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Reed Jr. |first1=George W. |date=1999 |title=Don't drink the water |url= |journal=Meteoritics & Planetary Science |volume=34 |issue= 5|pages=809–811 |doi=10.1111/j.1945-5100.1999.tb01394.x |bibcode=1999M&PS...34..809R |s2cid=129733422 |access-date=|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name=prospecting>{{cite journal |last1=Platts |first1=Warren J. |last2=Boucher |first2=Dale |last3=Gladstone |first3=G. Randall |date=12 December 2013 |title=Prospecting for Native Metals in Lunar Polar Craters |url= |journal=7th Symposium on Space Resource Utilization |volume= |issue= |pages= |doi=10.2514/6.2014-0338 |isbn=978-1-62410-315-5 |access-date=}}</ref> Native [[precious metal]]s, such as [[gold]], [[silver]], and probably [[platinum]], are also concentrated at the lunar poles by electrostatic dust transport.<ref name=prospecting/> There are only a few materials on the Moon which have been identified to make economic sense to ship directly back to the Earth, which are [[helium-3]] (for [[fusion power]]) and rare-earth minerals (for [[electronics]]). Instead, it makes more sense for these materials to be used in-space or being turned into valuable products for export. However, the Moon's lack of atmosphere provides no protection from space radiation or meteoroids, so [[lunar lava tube]]s have been proposed sites to gain protection.<ref>{{cite news|title=Moon hole might be suitable for colony|url=http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/space/01/01/moon.lava.hole/ | work=CNN | date=1 January 2010}}</ref> The Moon's low surface gravity is also a concern, as it is unknown whether 1/6[[g-force|g]] is enough to maintain human health for long periods.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Taylor|first=R. L.|date=March 1993|title=The effects of prolonged weightlessness and reduced gravity environments on human survival.|journal=Journal of the British Interplanetary Society|volume=46|issue=3|pages=97–106|pmid=11539500}}</ref>

Since the Moon has extreme temperature swings and toxic [[lunar regolith]], it is argued by some that the Moon will not become a place of habitation, but instead attract polluting [[Primary sector of the economy|extraction]] and [[Secondary sector of the economy|manufacturing industries]]. Furthermore, it has been argued that moving these industries to the Moon could help protect the Earth's environment and allow poorer countries to be released from the shackles of [[neocolonialism]] by wealthier countries. In the space colonization framework, the Moon will be transformed into an industrial hub of the Solar System.<ref name=":3" />{{Rp|page=|pages=161–172}}

Interest in establishing a [[moonbase]] has increased in the 21st century as an intermediate to Mars colonization.

The [[European Space Agency]] (ESA) head [[Johann-Dietrich Wörner|Jan Woerner]] at the International Astronautical Congress in Bremen, Germany, in October, 2018 proposed cooperation among countries and companies on lunar capabilities, a concept referred to as ''[[Moonbase#Moon Village|Moon Village]]''.<ref name=sn20180529>
{{cite news |last=Foust|first=Jeff |url=https://spacenews.com/bezos-outlines-vision-of-blue-origins-lunar-future/ |title=Bezos outlines vision of Blue Origin's lunar future |work=[[SpaceNews]] |date=29 May 2018 |access-date=21 August 2018 }}</ref>

In a December 2017 [[Space Policy Directive 1|directive]], the [[First presidency of Donald Trump|first Trump administration]] steered [[NASA]] to include a lunar mission on the pathway to other [[beyond Earth orbit]] (BEO) destinations.<ref name=spo20171217>{{cite web|url=https://spacepolicyonline.com/news/text-of-remarks-at-signing-of-trump-space-policy-directive-1-and-list-of-attendees/ |title=Text of Remarks at Signing of Trump Space Policy Directive 1 and List of Attendees |first=Marcia |last=Smith |website=Space Policy Online |date=11 December 2017 |access-date=21 August 2018}}</ref><ref name=sn20180529/>

In 2023, the U.S. Defense Department started a [[DARPA lunar programs|study]] of the necessary infrastructure and capabilities required to develop a moon-based economy over the following ten years.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Easley |first=Mikayla |date=5 December 2023 |title=DARPA taps 14 companies to study infrastructure needs for future lunar economy |url=https://defensescoop.com/2023/12/05/luna-10-darpa-award/ |access-date=22 March 2024 |website=defensescoop.com}}</ref>

As of 2024, on one side, [[China]], along with other partner countries, has announced its intention to establish the [[International Lunar Research Station]]. On the other side, the [[United States]], in collaboration with international partners, is advancing its [[Artemis program]], which includes plans to build [[Moonbase]]s near the lunar poles, close to [[permanently shadowed crater]]s, in the 2030s. The [[Chinese Lunar Exploration Program]] is seen as a means to bolster China's political influence and support its aspirations for [[superpower]] status, while the United States aims to maintain its position as the leading space power.

====Lagrange points====
{{Main|Lagrange point colonization}}
[[File:Lagrange points Earth vs Moon.jpg|thumb|A contour plot of the [[gravitational potential]] of the Moon and Earth, showing the five Earth–Moon Lagrange points]]

Another near-Earth possibility are the stable Earth–Moon [[Lagrangian point|Lagrange points]] {{L4}} and {{L5}}, at which point a space colony can float indefinitely. The [[L5 Society]] was founded to promote settlement by building space stations at these points. [[Gerard K. O'Neill]] suggested in 1974 that the stable region around L<sub>5</sub> could fit several thousand floating colonies, and would allow easy travel to and from the colonies due to the shallow [[effective potential]] at this point.<ref name="o'neill">{{cite journal |last1=O'Neill |first1=Gerard K. |author1-link=Gerard K. O'Neill |title=The colonization of space |journal=Physics Today |date=September 1974 |volume=27 |issue=9 |pages=32–40 |doi=10.1063/1.3128863 |bibcode=1974PhT....27i..32O |doi-access=free }}</ref>

=== Mars ===
{{Main|Colonization of Mars}}
[[File:Artist’s rendering of the approach to Mars.jpg|thumb|SpaceX has long considered [[SpaceX Mars colonization program|settling and colonizing Mars]] as its prime objective.]]

The hypothetical colonization of Mars has received interest from public space agencies and private corporations and has received extensive treatment in science fiction writing, film, and art.

While there have been many plans for a [[Human mission to Mars|human Mars mission]], including affordable ones such as [[Mars Direct]], none has been realized as of 2025. Both the United States and China have plans to send humans to Mars sometime in the 2040s, but these plans are not backed with hardware and funding.<ref name=":3" />{{Rp|page=|pages=219–223}} However, [[SpaceX]] is currently developing [[SpaceX Starship|Starship]], a [[Super heavy-lift launch vehicle|super-heavy-lift reusable launch vehicle]], with a vision of sending humans to Mars. As of November 2024, the company plans to send five uncrewed Starships to Mars in either 2026 or 2028–2029 [[launch window]]s<ref>{{Cite web |title=SpaceX Plans To Send Five Uncrewed Starships to Mars by 2026 |first=Joe |last=Hindy| date=10 October 2024 |url=https://www.cnet.com/science/space/spacex-plans-5-missions-to-mars-by-2026-elon-musk-says/ |access-date=27 November 2024 |website=CNET |language=en}}</ref> and SpaceX's CEO [[Elon Musk]] has repeatingly stated his support for the Mars efforts, both financially and politically.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Koren |first=Marina |date=5 November 2024 |title=MAGA Goes to Mars |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2024/11/musk-trump-mars-spacex/680529/ |access-date=27 November 2024 |website=The Atlantic |language=en}}</ref>

Mars is more suitable for habitation than the Moon, with a stronger gravity, rich amount of materials needed for life, day/night cycle nearly identical to Earth, and a thin atmosphere to protect from [[Micrometeoroid|micrometeroids]]. The main disadvantage of Mars compared to the Moon is the six-to-nine-month transit time and the lengthy launch window, which occurs approximately every two years.<ref name=":3" />{{Rp|page=|pages=175}} Without [[in situ resource utilization]], Mars colonization would be nearly impossible as it would require bringing thousands of tons of payload to sustain a handful of astronauts. If Martian materials can be used to make propellant (such as [[methane]] with the [[Sabatier reaction|Sabatier process]]) and supplies (such as [[oxygen]] for crews), the amount of supplies needed to bring to Mars can be greatly reduced.<ref>{{Cite journal|title = From local resources to in situ propellant and chemical production on Mars. A possible pathway|journal = Chemical Engineering Journal|date = June 2025|volume = 513|doi = 10.1016/j.cej.2025.162490|first1 = Arturo|last1 = Pajares|first2 =Paulina|last2= Govea-Alvarez|first3=Zhiyuan |last3=Chen|first4= Melchiorre|last4= Conti|first5= Bart |last5= Michielsen| article-number=162490 | bibcode=2025ChEnJ.51362490P |doi-access = free}}</ref><ref name=":3" />{{Rp|page=|pages=228–230}} Even then, Mars colonies will not be economically viable in the near term, thus reasons for colonizing Mars will be mostly ideological and prestige-based, such as a desire for [[freedom]].<ref name=":3" />{{Rp|page=|pages=267–270, 280}}

=== Other inner Solar System bodies ===
====Mercury====
Mercury is rich in metals and volatiles, as well as solar energy. However, Mercury is the [[Delta-v budget|most energy-consuming body on the Solar System]] to land for spacecraft launching from Earth, and astronauts there must contend with the extreme temperature differential and radiation.<ref name=":3" />{{Rp|page=|pages=311–314}}

[[File:TerraformedMercuryGlobe.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|An artist's conception of a terraformed [[Mercury (planet)|Mercury]]]]
Once thought to be a volatile-depleted body like the Moon, Mercury is now known to be volatile-rich, surprisingly richer in volatiles than any other terrestrial body in the inner Solar System.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=McCubbin|first1=Francis M.|last2=Riner|first2=Miriam A.|last3=Kaaden|first3=Kathleen E. Vander|last4=Burkemper|first4=Laura K.|date=2012|title=Is Mercury a volatile-rich planet?|journal=Geophysical Research Letters|language=en|volume=39|issue=9|article-number=2012GL051711 |pages=n/a|doi=10.1029/2012GL051711|bibcode=2012GeoRL..39.9202M|issn=1944-8007|doi-access=free}}</ref> The planet also receives six and a half times the solar flux as the Earth/Moon system,<ref name=Bolonkin>{{cite book |last=Bolonkin |first=Alexander A. |date=2015 |editor-last1=Badescu |editor-first1=Viorel |editor-last2=Zacny |editor-first2=Kris |title=Inner Solar System: Prospective Energy and Material Resources |publisher=Springer-Verlag |pages=407–419 |chapter=Chapter 19: Economic Development of Mercury: A Comparison with Mars Colonization |isbn=978-3-319-19568-1}}</ref> making solar energy an effective energy source; it could be harnessed through orbital solar arrays and beamed to the surface or exported to other planets.<ref name=UTMercury/>

Geologist Stephen Gillett suggested in 1996, that this could make Mercury an ideal place to build and launch [[solar sail]] spacecraft, which could launch as folded "chunks" by a [[mass driver]] from Mercury's surface. Once in space, the solar sails would deploy. Solar energy for the mass driver should be easy to produce, and solar sails near Mercury would have 6.5 times the thrust they do near Earth. This could make Mercury an ideal place to acquire materials useful in building hardware to send to (and terraform) Venus. Vast solar collectors could also be built on or near Mercury to produce power for large-scale engineering activities such as laser-pushed light sails to nearby star systems.<ref>{{cite book|first1=Stanley |last1=Schmidt |first2=Robert |last2=Zubrin |title=Islands in the Sky: Bold New Ideas for Colonizing Space |publisher=Wiley |date=1996 |pages=71–84 |isbn=978-0-471-13561-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YCV0QgAACAAJ|access-date=18 April 2025}}</ref>

As Mercury has essentially no axial tilt, crater floors near its poles lie in [[crater of eternal darkness|eternal darkness]], never seeing the Sun. They function as [[cold trap (astronomy)|cold traps]], trapping volatiles for geological periods. It is estimated that the poles of Mercury contain 10<sup>14</sup>–10<sup>15</sup>&nbsp;kg of water, likely covered by about 5.65×10<sup>9</sup> m<sup>3</sup> of hydrocarbons. This would make agriculture possible. It has been suggested that plant varieties could be developed to take advantage of the high light intensity and the long day of Mercury. The poles do not experience the significant day-night variations the rest of Mercury do, making them the best place on the planet to begin a colony.<ref name=Bolonkin/>

Another option is to live underground, where day-night variations would be damped enough that temperatures would stay roughly constant. There are indications that Mercury contains [[lava tube]]s, like the Moon and Mars, which would be suitable for this purpose.<ref name=UTMercury>{{cite web |url=https://www.universetoday.com/130109/how-do-we-colonize-mercury/ |title=How do we Colonize Mercury? |last=Williams |first=Matt |date=3 August 2016 |website=[[Universe Today]] |access-date=22 August 2021}}</ref> Underground temperatures in a ring around Mercury's poles can reach room temperature on Earth, 22±1&nbsp;°C; and this is achieved at depths starting from about 0.7&nbsp;m. This presence of volatiles and abundance of energy has led [[Alexander Bolonkin]] and James Shifflett to consider Mercury preferable to Mars for colonization.<ref name=Bolonkin/><ref>{{cite web |url=https://einstein-schrodinger.com/mercury_colony.html |title=A Mercury Colony? |last=Shifflett |first=James |date=n.d. |website=einstein-schrodinger.com |access-date=31 July 2021}}</ref>

Yet a third option could be to continually move to stay on the night side, as Mercury's 176-day-long day-night cycle means that the [[terminator (solar)|terminator]] travels very slowly.<ref name=UTMercury/>

Because Mercury is very dense, its surface gravity is 0.38g like Mars, even though it is a smaller planet.<ref name=Bolonkin/> This would be easier to adjust to than lunar gravity (0.16g), but presents advantages regarding lower escape velocity from Mercury than from Earth.<ref name=UTMercury/> Mercury's proximity gives it advantages over the asteroids and outer planets, and its low [[synodic period]] means that launch windows from Earth to Mercury are more frequent than those from Earth to Venus or Mars.<ref name=UTMercury/>

On the downside, a Mercury colony would require significant shielding from radiation and solar flares, and since Mercury is airless, decompression and temperature extremes would be constant risks.<ref name=UTMercury/>

====Venus====
{{Main|Colonization of Venus}}
Though the surface of Venus is extremely hostile, habitats high above the atmosphere of Venus are fairly habitable, with temperatures ranging from 30&nbsp;°C to 70&nbsp;°C (86 to 158&nbsp;°F) and a pressure similar to the Earth's sea level at an altitude of 50 kilometers (30 miles).<ref>{{Cite web |date=9 November 2017 |title=Venus: Facts - NASA Science |url=https://science.nasa.gov/venus/venus-facts/ |access-date=29 January 2025 |language=en-US}}</ref> However, beside tourism opportunities, the economic benefit of a Venusian colony is minimal.<ref name=":3" />{{Rp|page=|pages=308–310}}

====Asteroid belt====
{{Main|Colonization of the asteroid belt}} 
Asteroids can provide enough material in the form of water, air, fuel, metal, soil, and nutrients to support ten to a hundred trillion humans in space. Many asteroids contain minerals that are inheriently valuable, such as rare earths and precious metals. However, low gravity, distance from Earth and disperse nature of their orbits make it difficult to settle on small asteroids.<ref name=":3" />{{Rp|page=|pages=203,204,218}}

===Giant planets===
There have also been proposals to place robotic [[aerostat]]s in the upper atmospheres of the Solar System's [[giant planet]]s for exploration and possibly mining of [[helium-3]], which could have a very high value per unit mass as a thermonuclear fuel.<ref name="zubrin1999"/>{{rp|158–160}}<ref name="He3U"/>

Robert Zubrin identified [[Saturn]], [[Uranus]] and [[Neptune]] as "the [[Persian Gulf]] of the Solar System", as the largest sources of [[deuterium]] and helium-3 to drive a [[nuclear fusion|fusion]] economy, with Saturn the most important and most valuable of the three, because of its relative proximity, low radiation, and large system of moons.<ref name="zubrin1999"/>{{rp|161–163}} On the other hand, planetary scientist [[John S. Lewis|John Lewis]] in his 1997 book ''[[Mining the Sky]]'', insists that Uranus is the likeliest place to mine helium-3 because of its significantly shallower gravity well, which makes it easier for a laden tanker spacecraft to thrust itself away. Furthermore, Uranus is an [[ice giant]], which would likely make it easier to separate the helium from the atmosphere.

Because [[Uranus]] has the lowest [[escape velocity]] of the four giant planets, it has been proposed as a mining site for [[helium-3]].<ref name="He3U"/> As Uranus is a gas giant without a viable surface, one of [[Uranus's natural satellites]] might serve as a base.<ref>{{cite web|first=Joseph |last=Castro |date=17 March 2015 |title=What It Would Be Like to Live on Uranus' Moons Titania and Miranda |url=https://www.space.com/28827-living-on-uranus-moons-titania-miranda.html |website=space.com|access-date=19 April 2025}}</ref>

It is hypothesized that one of [[Neptune]]'s satellites could be used for colonization. [[Triton (moon)|Triton]]'s surface shows signs of extensive geological activity that implies a subsurface ocean, perhaps composed of ammonia/water.<ref>{{cite journal| last=Ruiz| first=Javier| year=2003| title=Heat flow and depth to a possible internal ocean on Triton| journal=Icarus| volume=166| doi=10.1016/j.icarus.2003.09.009| page=436| bibcode=2003Icar..166..436R| issue=2| url=http://eprints.ucm.es/10454/1/11-Trit%C3%B3n_1.pdf| access-date=10 April 2023| archive-date=12 December 2019 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191212145428/http://eprints.ucm.es/10454/1/11-Trit%C3%B3n_1.pdf| url-status=dead}}</ref> If technology advanced to the point that tapping such geothermal energy was possible, it could make colonizing a cryogenic world like Triton feasible, supplemented by [[nuclear fusion]] power.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Case Study on Human Colonization of Triton |first1=T.A. |last1=Aadithya |first2=Aman |last2=Srivastava |first3=Prinan |last3=Banerjee |first4=P. |last4=Partheban |url=https://www.worldresearchlibrary.org/up_proc/pdf/99-14483036648-10.pdf |journal=Proceedings of 3rd IASTEM International Conference |location=Singapore |date=7 November 2015 |isbn=978-93-85832-33-8}}</ref>

====Moons of outer planets====
[[File:Cryobot.jpg|thumb|Artist's impression of a hypothetical ocean [[cryobot]] in [[Europa (moon)|Europa]]]]
Human missions to the outer planets would need to arrive quickly due to the effects of space radiation and microgravity along the journey.<ref name=Palaszewski>{{cite conference |url=https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2015-1654 |title=Solar System Exploration Augmented by In-Situ Resource Utilization: Human Mercury and Saturn Exploration |last1=Palaszewski |first1=Bryan |date=2015 |publisher= |book-title= |pages= |doi=10.2514/6.2015-1654 |location=Kissimmee, Florida |conference=8th Symposium on Space Resource Utilization |id=|hdl=2060/20150004114 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> In 2012, Thomas B. Kerwick wrote that the distance to the outer planets made their human exploration impractical for now, noting that travel times for round trips to Mars were estimated at two years, and that the closest approach of Jupiter to Earth is over ten times farther than the closest approach of Mars to Earth. However, he noted that this could change with "significant advancement on spacecraft design".<ref name=Kerwick/> [[Nuclear thermal rocket|Nuclear-thermal]] or nuclear-electric engines have been suggested as a way to make the journey to Jupiter in a reasonable amount of time.<ref name=UTJupiter/> Another possibility would be plasma [[Magnetic sail|magnet sails]], a technology already suggested for rapidly sending a probe to Jupiter.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Freeze |first1=Brent |last2=Greason |first2=Jeff |last3=Nader |first3=Ronnie |last4=Febres |first4=Jaime Jaramillo |last5=Chaves-Jiminez |first5=Adolfo |last6=Lamontagne |first6=Michel |last7=Thomas |first7=Stephanie |last8=Cassibry |first8=Jason |last9=Fuller |first9=John |last10=Davis |first10=Eric |last11=Conway |first11=Darrel |date=1 February 2022 |title=Jupiter Observing Velocity Experiment (JOVE): Introduction to Wind Rider Solar Electric Propulsion Demonstrator and Science Objectives |journal=Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific |volume=134 |issue=1032 |pages=023001 |doi=10.1088/1538-3873/ac4812 |issn=0004-6280|doi-access=free |bibcode=2022PASP..134b3001F }}</ref> The cold would also be a factor, necessitating a robust source of heat energy for spacesuits and bases.<ref name=Kerwick/> Most of the larger moons of the outer planets contain [[Ice|water ice]], [[liquid water]], and organic compounds that might be useful for sustaining human life.<ref name="icemoons">{{cite journal|first=G. J. |last=Consalmagno |title=Ice-rich moons and the physical properties of ice |journal=Journal of Physical Chemistry |volume=87 |number=21 |date=1 October 1983 |pages=4204–4208 |doi=10.1021/j100244a045 |bibcode=1983JPhCh..87.4204C |url=https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/j100244a045 }}</ref><ref name="liftveil">{{cite book|first1=Ralph |last1=Lorenz |first2=Jacqueline |last2=Mitton |title=Lifting Titan's veil: exploring the giant moon of Saturn |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2002 |isbn=978-0-521-79348-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VLDG5awUsPoC}}</ref>

[[Robert Zubrin]] has suggested Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune as advantageous locations for colonization because their atmospheres are good sources of fusion fuels, such as [[deuterium]] and [[helium-3]]. Zubrin suggested that Saturn would be the most important and valuable as it is the closest and has an extensive satellite system. Jupiter's high gravity makes it difficult to extract gases from its atmosphere, and its strong radiation belt makes developing its system difficult.<ref name=UTSaturn/> On the other hand, fusion power has yet to be achieved, and fusion power from helium-3 is more difficult to achieve than conventional [[deuterium–tritium fusion]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Day |first1=Dwayne | author-link = Dwayne A. Day |title=The helium-3 incantation |url=http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2834/1 |access-date=11 January 2019 |work=The Space Review |date=28 September 2015}}</ref> Jeffrey Van Cleve, Carl Grillmair, and Mark Hanna instead focus on Uranus, because the [[delta-v]] required to get helium-3 from the atmosphere into orbit is half that needed for Jupiter, and because Uranus' atmosphere is five times richer in helium than Saturn's.<ref name="He3U">{{cite web |first1=Jeffrey |last1=Van Cleve |first2=Carl |last2=Grillmair |first3=Mark |last3=Hanna |url=http://www.mines.edu/research/srr/2001abstracts/vancleve.PDF |title=Helium-3 Mining Aerostats in the Atmosphere of Uranus |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060630164712/http://www.mines.edu/research/srr/2001abstracts/vancleve.PDF|archive-date=30 June 2006 |access-date=10 May 2006}}</ref>

Jupiter's [[Galilean moons]] (Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto) and Saturn's [[Titan (moon)|Titan]] are the only moons that have gravities comparable to Earth's Moon. The Moon has a 0.17g gravity; Io, 0.18g; Europa, 0.13g; Ganymede, 0.15g; Callisto, 0.13g; and Titan, 0.14g. Neptune's [[Triton (moon)|Triton]] has about half the Moon's gravity (0.08g); other [[planetary-mass moon|round moons]] provide even less (starting from Uranus' [[Titania (moon)|Titania]] and [[Oberon (moon)|Oberon]] at about 0.04g).<ref name=Kerwick/>

====Jovian moons====
[[File:Callisto base.PNG|thumb|upright=1.2|Artist's impression of a base on Callisto<ref name="CallistoBase">{{cite web|title=Vision for Space Exploration|url=http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/55583main_vision_space_exploration2.pdf|publisher=[[NASA]]|year=2004}}</ref>]]
<div style="float:right; margin:2px;">
{| class=wikitable style="text-align:center; font-size:11px"
|+ Jovian radiation
! Moon !! [[Röntgen equivalent man|rem]]/day
|-
| Io || 3600<ref name="ringwald">{{cite web |date=29 February 2000 |title=SPS 1020 (Introduction to Space Sciences) |publisher=California State University, Fresno |last=Ringwald |first=Frederick A. |url=https://zimmer.csufresno.edu/~fringwal/w08a.jup.txt |url-status=dead |access-date=5 January 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080725050708/https://zimmer.csufresno.edu/~fringwal/w08a.jup.txt |archive-date=25 July 2008 }}</ref>
|-
| Europa || 540<ref name="ringwald"/>
|-
|Ganymede || 8<ref name="ringwald"/>
|-
| Callisto || 0.01<ref name="ringwald"/>
|-
! Earth (Max) !!  0.07
|-
! Earth (Avg) !! 0.0007

|}</div>

The [[Jupiter|Jovian]] system in general has particular disadvantages for colonization, including a deep [[gravity well]]. The [[magnetosphere of Jupiter]] bombards the [[moons of Jupiter]] with intense [[ionizing radiation]]<ref name="radjup">{{cite journal|first1=R. Walker |last1=Fillius |first2=Carl E. |last2=McIlwain |first3=Antonio |last3=Mogro-Campero |title=Radiation Belts of Jupiter: A Second Look |journal=Science |volume=188 |number=4187 |pages=465–467 |date=2 May 1975 |doi=10.1126/science.188.4187.465 |pmid=17734363 |bibcode=1975Sci...188..465F |url=https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.188.4187.465}}</ref> delivering about 36 [[Sievert#Dose examples|Sv]] per day to unshielded colonists on [[Io (moon)|Io]] and about 5.40 Sv per day on [[Europa (moon)|Europa]]. Exposure to about 0.75 Sv over a few days is enough to cause [[Acute radiation syndrome|radiation poisoning]], and about 5&nbsp;Sv over a few days is fatal.<ref name="zubrin1999"/>{{rp|166–170}}

Jupiter itself, like the other gas giants, has further disadvantages. There is no accessible surface on which to land, and the light hydrogen atmosphere would not provide good buoyancy for some kind of aerial habitat as has been proposed for Venus.

Radiation levels on [[Io (moon)|Io]] and [[Europa (moon)|Europa]] are extreme, enough to kill unshielded humans within an Earth day.<ref name="zubrin1999">{{cite book |first=Robert |last=Zubrin |title=Entering Space: Creating a Spacefaring Civilization |publisher=Tarcher/Putnam |date=1999 |isbn=978-1-58542-036-0|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=67XuAAAAMAAJ |access-date=18 April 2025}}</ref>{{rp|163–170}} Therefore, only [[Callisto (moon)|Callisto]] and perhaps [[Ganymede (moon)|Ganymede]] could reasonably support a human colony. Callisto orbits outside Jupiter's radiation belt.<ref name=Kerwick/> Ganymede's low latitudes are partially shielded by the moon's magnetic field, though not enough to completely remove the need for radiation shielding. Both of them have available water, silicate rock, and metals that could be mined and used for construction.<ref name=Kerwick/>

Although Io's volcanism and tidal heating constitute valuable resources, exploiting them is probably impractical.<ref name=Kerwick>{{cite journal |last1=Kerwick |first1=Thomas B. |date=2012 |title=Colonizing Jupiter's Moons: An Assessment of Our Options and Alternatives |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/24536505 |journal=Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences |volume=98 |issue=4 |pages=15–26 |jstor=24536505 |access-date=1 August 2021}}</ref> Europa is rich in water (its subsurface ocean is expected to contain over twice as much water as all Earth's oceans together)<ref name=UTJupiter/> and likely oxygen, but metals and minerals would have to be imported. If alien microbial life exists on Europa, human immune systems may not protect against it. Sufficient radiation shielding might, however, make Europa an interesting location for a research base.<ref name=Kerwick/> The private ''[[Artemis Project]]'' drafted a plan in 1997 to colonize Europa, involving surface igloos as bases to drill down into the ice and explore the ocean underneath, and suggesting that humans could live in "air pockets" in the ice layer.<ref>[http://www.asi.org/ Artemis Society International], {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110820180833/http://asi.org/|date=20 August 2011}} official website.</ref><ref>{{cite journal|first1=Peter |last1=Kokh |first2=Mark |last2=Kaehny |first3=Doug |last3=Armstrong |first4=Ken |last4=Burnside |url=http://asi.org/adb/06/09/03/02/110/europa2-wkshp.html |title=Europa II Workshop Report |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190607102248/http://asi.org/adb/06/09/03/02/110/europa2-wkshp.html|archive-date=7 June 2019 |journal=Moon Miner's Manifesto |volume=110 |date=November 1997}}</ref><ref name=UTJupiter>{{cite web |url=https://www.universetoday.com/130637/colonize-jupiters-moons/ |title=How do we Colonize Jupiter's Moons? |last=Williams |first=Matt |date=23 November 2016 |website=[[Universe Today]] |access-date=10 January 2022}}</ref> Ganymede<ref name=UTJupiter/> and Callisto are also expected to have internal oceans.<ref name='OW Roadmap 2019'>{{cite journal | last1 = Hendrix | first1 = Amanda R. | last2 = Hurford | first2 = Terry A. | last3 = Barge | first3 = Laura M. | last4 = Bland | first4 = Michael T. | last5 = Bowman | first5 = Jeff S. | last6 = Brinckerhoff | first6 = William | last7 = Buratti | first7 = Bonnie J. | last8 = Cable | first8 = Morgan L. | last9 = Castillo-Rogez | first9 = Julie | last10 = Collins | first10 = Geoffrey C. | display-authors = etal | year = 2019| title = The NASA Roadmap to Ocean Worlds | journal = Astrobiology | volume = 19| issue = 1 | pages = 1–27| doi = 10.1089/ast.2018.1955 | pmid = 30346215 | pmc = 6338575 | bibcode = 2019AsBio..19....1H | doi-access = free }}</ref> It might be possible to build a surface base that would produce fuel for further exploration of the Solar System.

In 2003, NASA performed a study called ''HOPE'' (Revolutionary Concepts for Human Outer Planet Exploration) regarding the future exploration of the Solar System.<ref>{{cite report|first1=Patrick A. |last1=Troutman |first2=Kristen |last2=Bethke |first3=Frederic H. |last3=Stillwagen |first4=Darrell L. |last4=Caldwell, Jr |first5=Ram |last5=Manvi |first6=Chris |last6=Strickland |first7=Shawn A. |last7=Krizan |url=https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20030063128.pdf |title=Revolutionary Concepts for Human Outer Planet Exploration (HOPE) |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170815051016/https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20030063128.pdf|archive-date=15 August 2017 |date=28 January 2003 |access-date= 19 April 2025|publisher=NASA Langley Research Center}}</ref> The target chosen was [[Callisto (moon)|Callisto]] due to its distance from Jupiter, and thus the planet's harmful radiation. It could be possible to build a surface base that would produce fuel for further exploration of the Solar System.<ref>{{cite book|last=Seedhouse|first=Erik|title=Interplanetary Outpost: The Human and Technological Challenges of Exploring the Outer Planets|year=2012 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Cf3N1ejDNO4C|publisher=Springer |location=Berlin |isbn=978-1-4419-9747-0|access-date=19 April 2025}}</ref>{{rp|21}} HOPE estimated a round trip time for a crewed mission of about 2–5 years, assuming significant progress in propulsion technologies.<ref name=Kerwick/>

[[Io (moon)|Io]] is not ideal for colonization, due to its hostile environment. The moon is under influence of high tidal forces, causing high volcanic activity. Jupiter's strong radiation belt overshadows Io, delivering 36 Sv a day to the moon. The moon is also extremely dry. Io is the least ideal place for the colonization of the four Galilean moons.
Despite this, its volcanoes could be energy resources for the other moons, which are better suited to colonization.

[[File:Currents in Jovian Magnetosphere.png|thumb|upright=2|The magnetic field of Jupiter and co-rotation rotation enforcing currents]]

[[Ganymede (moon)|Ganymede]] is the largest moon in the Solar System. Ganymede is the only moon with a [[magnetosphere]], albeit overshadowed by [[Magnetosphere of Jupiter|Jupiter's magnetic field]]. Because of this magnetic field, Ganymede is one of only two Jovian moons where surface settlements would be feasible because it receives about 0.08 [[Sievert|Sv]] of radiation per day. Ganymede could be terraformed.<ref name="ringwald"/>

The [[Keck Observatory]] announced in 2006 that the binary [[Jupiter trojan]] [[617 Patroclus]], and possibly many other Jupiter trojans, are likely composed of water ice, with a layer of dust. This suggests that mining water and other volatiles in this region and transporting them elsewhere in the Solar System, perhaps via the proposed [[Interplanetary Transport Network]], may be feasible in the not-so-distant future. This could make [[colonization of the Moon]], [[Colonization of Mercury|Mercury]] and main-belt [[Colonization of the asteroids|asteroids]] more practical.

====Saturn====
Saturn's radiation belt is much weaker than Jupiter's, so radiation is less of an issue here. Dione, Rhea, Titan, and Iapetus all orbit outside the radiation belt, and Titan's thick atmosphere would adequately shield against cosmic radiation.<ref name=UTSaturn/>

Saturn has seven moons [[planetary-mass moon|large enough to be round]]: in order of increasing distance from Saturn, they are [[Mimas (moon)|Mimas]], [[Enceladus]], [[Tethys (moon)|Tethys]], [[Dione (moon)|Dione]], [[Rhea (moon)|Rhea]], [[Titan (moon)|Titan]], and [[Iapetus (moon)|Iapetus]].

=====Enceladus=====
The small moon Enceladus is also of interest, having a subsurface ocean that is separated from the surface by only tens of meters of ice at the south pole, compared to kilometers of ice separating the ocean from the surface on Europa. Volatile and organic compounds are present there, and the moon's high density for an ice world (1.6&nbsp;g/cm<sup>3</sup>) indicates that its core is rich in silicates.<ref name=UTSaturn>{{cite web |url=https://www.universetoday.com/132413/colonize-saturns-moons/ |title=How do we Colonize Saturns' Moons |last=Williams |first=Matt |date=22 December 2016 |website=[[Universe Today]] |access-date=22 August 2021}}</ref>

On 9 March 2006, [[NASA]]'s ''[[Cassini–Huygens|Cassini]]'' space probe found possible evidence of liquid water on [[Enceladus]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://spacenews.com/nasas-cassini-discovers-potential-liquid-water-on-enceladus/ |title=NASA's Cassini Discovers Potential Liquid Water on Enceladus |publisher=Space News|date=9 March 2006 |access-date=16 April 2025}}</ref> According to that article, "pockets of liquid water may be no more than tens of meters below the surface." These findings were confirmed in 2014 by NASA. This means liquid water could be collected much more easily and safely on Enceladus than, for instance, on Europa (see above). Discovery of water, especially liquid water, generally makes a celestial body a much more likely candidate for colonization. An alternative model of Enceladus's activity is the decomposition of methane/water [[clathrate]]s – a process requiring lower temperatures than liquid water eruptions. The higher density of Enceladus indicates a larger than Saturnian average silicate core that could provide materials for base operations.

=====Titan=====
{{Main|Colonization of Titan}}
Authors like [[Robert Zubrin]] have offered that Saturn is the most important and valuable of the four [[gas giant]]s in the [[Solar System]], because of its relative proximity, low radiation, and excellent system of moons. He named Titan as the best candidate on which to establish a base to exploit the resources of the Saturn system.<ref name="zubrin1999"/>{{rp|161-163}} He pointed out that Titan possesses an abundance of all the elements necessary to support life, saying "In certain ways, Titan is the most hospitable extraterrestrial world within our solar system for human colonization."<ref name="zubrin1999"/>{{rp|163-166}}

To consider a colony on [[Saturn]]'s largest moon [[Titan (moon)|Titan]], protection against the extreme cold must be a primary consideration.<ref>{{cite web|title=Mars vs. Titan: A Showdown of Human Habitability |first=Kasha |last=Patel  |date=1 October 2018 | url=https://www.acs.org/education/chemmatters/past-issues/2018-2019/october2018/mars-vs-titan.html |website=acs.org |access-date=20 April 2025}}</ref> Titan offers a gravity of approximately 1/7 of Earth gravity, in the same range as Earth's Moon. Atmospheric pressure at the surface of the planet is about 1.5x that of the surface of the Earth; there is however, no oxygen present in the environment. The atmosphere is about 95% nitrogen and 5% methane.<ref>{{cite web|title=Titan: Facts|url=https://science.nasa.gov/saturn/moons/titan/facts/ |website=NASA|date=2 May 2018 |access-date=21 April 2025}}</ref> Some estimates suggest that abundant energy resources on Titan could power a colony with a population size of the United States.<ref>{{cite web |title=Titan Has Enough Energy to Power a Colony The Size of The US |url=https://www.sciencealert.com/titan-has-enough-energy-to-power-a-colony-the-size-of-the-us |date=10 July 2017 |first=David |last=Nield |website=sciencealert.com|access-date=20 April 2025}}</ref>

The dense atmosphere of Titan shields the surface from radiation and would make any structural failures problematic, rather than catastrophic. With an oxygen mask and thermal clothing protection, humans could roam Titan's surface in the dim sunlight. Or, given the low gravity and dense atmosphere, they could float above it in a balloon or on personal wings.<ref>{{cite web|title=Forget Mars—let's go colonize Titan! |first=John |last=Timmer – |date= 13 May 2017 |url=https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/05/forget-mars-lets-go-colonize-titan/ |website=arstechnica.com|access-date=26 April 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=The tech we need to build a colony on Titan |first=Jamie |last=Carter |date=28 August 2017 |url=https://www.techradar.com/news/the-tech-we-need-to-build-a-colony-on-titan |website=techradar.com|access-date=21 April 2025}}</ref>

===Trans-Neptunian region===
{{main|Colonization of trans-Neptunian objects}}

{{Excerpt|Colonization of trans-Neptunian objects|paragraph=1}}

===Beyond the Solar System===
{{Further|Interstellar travel}}
[[File:Proposed world ship based on Stanford Torus-2012.png|thumb|Diagram of the [[Stanford Torus]]-based world ship described in ''World Ships – Architectures & Feasibility Revisited'' paper,<ref name="hein-pak-putz-revisited" /> also considering the detailed design of Stanford Torus as described in ''Space Settlements: A Design Study'' book<ref>{{Cite book |last=NASA |url=http://archive.org/details/SpaceSettlementsADesignStudy1977 |title=Space Settlements: A Design Study (1977) |date=1977}}</ref>]]
Beyond the Solar System colonization targets might be identified in the [[List of nearest stars|surrounding stars]]. The main difficulty is the vast distances to other stars.

To reach such targets travel times of millennia would be necessary, with current technology. At average speeds of even 0.1% of the speed of light (''c'') interstellar expansion across the entire [[Milky Way galaxy]] would take up to one-half of the Sun's galactic orbital period of ~240,000,000 years, which is comparable to the timescale of other galactic processes.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://hypertextbook.com/facts/2002/StacyLeong.shtml|work=The Physics Factbook|last=Leong|first=Stacy|year=2002|title=Period of the Sun's Orbit around the Galaxy (Cosmic Year)|access-date=19 April 2025}}</ref> Due to fundamental energy and reaction mass consideration such speeds would be with current technology limited to small spaceships. If humanity would gain access to a large amount of energy, on the order of the mass-energy of entire planets, it may become possible to construct spaceships with [[Alcubierre drive]]s.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Williams |first=Matt |date=1 March 2020 |title=Scientists Are Starting to Take Warp Drives Seriously, Especially This One Concept |work=ScienceAlert.com |url=https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-are-starting-to-take-warp-drives-seriously-especially-this-one-concept |access-date=19 April 2025}}</ref>

The following are plausible approaches with current technology:
* A [[generation ship]] which would travel much slower than light, with consequent interstellar trip times of many decades or centuries. The crew would go through generations before the journey was complete, so none of the initial crew would be expected to survive to arrive at the destination, assuming current human lifespans.<ref name="hein-pak-putz-revisited">{{cite journal |last1=Hein |first1=Andreas M. |last2=Pak |first2=Mikhail |last3=Pütz |first3=Daniel |last4=Bühler |first4=Christian |last5=Reiss |first5=Philipp |title=World ships—architectures & feasibility revisited |journal=Journal of the British Interplanetary Society |date=2012 |volume=65 |issue=4 |page=119|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236177990 }}</ref>
* A [[sleeper ship]], where most or all of the crew spend the journey in some form of [[hibernation]] or [[suspended animation]], allowing some or all to reach the destination.<ref>{{cite news|title=Sleeper spaceship could carry first humans to Mars in hibernation state
|first=Ben |last=Brumfield |date=7 October 2014 |url=https://www.cnn.com/2014/10/07/tech/innovation/mars-hibernation-flight/index.html |publisher=CNN|access-date=18 April 2025}}</ref>
* An [[embryo space colonization|embryo-carrying interstellar starship]] (EIS), much smaller than a generation ship or sleeper ship, transporting human [[embryo]]s or DNA in a frozen or dormant state to the destination. (Obvious biological and psychological problems in birthing, raising, and educating such voyagers, neglected here, may not be fundamental.)<ref name="Crowl, 2012">{{cite journal|last=Crowl|first=Adam|title=Embryo Space Colonisation to Overcome the Interstellar Time Distance Bottleneck|url=http://www.jbis.org.uk/paper.php?p=2012.65.283|journal=Journal of the British Interplanetary Society |pages=283–285 |year=2012|volume=65 |display-authors=etal |bibcode=2012JBIS...65..283C }}</ref>
* A [[nuclear fusion]] or [[nuclear fission|fission]] powered ship (e.g. [[ion drive]]) of some kind, achieving velocities of up to perhaps 10% ''c''&nbsp; permitting one-way trips to nearby stars with durations comparable to a human lifetime.<ref>{{cite news|title=Nuclear Pulse Propulsion: Gateway to the Stars|date=27 March 2013 |first=Stan |last=Tackett |url=https://www.ans.org/news/article-1294/nuclear-pulse-propulsion-gateway-to-the-stars/ |publisher=American Nuclear Society|access-date=19 April 2025}}</ref>
* A [[Project Orion (nuclear propulsion)|Project Orion]]-ship, a nuclear-powered concept proposed by [[Freeman Dyson]] which would use [[nuclear bomb|nuclear explosions]] to propel a starship. A special case of the preceding nuclear rocket concepts, with similar potential velocity capability, but possibly easier technology.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Case For Orion |url=https://www.spacedaily.com/news/nuclearspace-03h.html |access-date=2023-08-03 |website=www.spacedaily.com |archive-date=August 3, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230803065646/https://www.spacedaily.com/news/nuclearspace-03h.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
* [[Solar sail|Laser propulsion]] concepts, using some form of beaming of power from the Solar System might allow a [[solar sail|light-sail]] or other ship to reach high speeds, comparable to those theoretically attainable by the fusion-powered electric rocket, above.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Roundtrip interstellar travel using laser-pushed lightsails |first=Robert L. |last=Forward |date=April 1984 |url=https://doi.org/10.2514/3.8632 |journal=Journal of Spacecraft|volume=21|number=2|pages=187–195 |doi=10.2514/3.8632 |bibcode=1984JSpRo..21..187F |access-date=19 April 2025}}</ref> These methods would need some means, such as supplementary nuclear propulsion, to stop at the destination, but a hybrid (light-sail for acceleration, fusion-electric for deceleration) system might be possible.
* [[Mind uploading|Uploaded human minds]] or [[artificial intelligence]] may be transmitted via radio or laser at light speed to interstellar destinations where [[self-replicating spacecraft]] have traveled subluminally and set up infrastructure and possibly also brought some minds. [[Extraterrestrial intelligence]] might be another viable destination.<ref>{{cite web|title= Uploaded e-crews for interstellar missions |date= 12 December 2012 |url= https://www.thekurzweillibrary.com/uploaded-e-crews-for-interstellar-missions |website= kurzweilai.net| access-date= 19 April 2025}}</ref>

====Intergalactic travel====
{{Main|Intergalactic travel}} 
[[File:Interstellar vessel of Island One size, ion-driven, Don Davis, 1977.gif|thumb|upright=1.2|Proposed interstellar vessel based on [[Gerard K. O'Neill]]'s Island One version of [[Bernal sphere]] space habitat]]
The distances between galaxies are on the order of a million times farther than those between the stars, and thus intergalactic colonization would involve voyages of millions of years via special self-sustaining methods.<ref name="burruss">{{cite journal | first1 = Robert Page | last1 = Burruss | first2= J. | last2= Colwell | title = Intergalactic Travel: The Long Voyage From Home | journal = The Futurist | date=September–October 1987 | volume= 21 | issue= 5 | pages = 29–33}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | author= Fogg, Martyn | title= The Feasibility of Intergalactic Colonisation and its Relevance to SETI | journal= Journal of the British Interplanetary Society | volume= 41 | number= 11 | date= November 1988 | pages= 491–496 | url= https://www.academia.edu/4166742 | bibcode= 1988JBIS...41..491F }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | author= Armstrong, Stuart | author2= Sandberg, Anders | url= http://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/intergalactic-spreading.pdf | title=Eternity in six hours: intergalactic spreading of intelligent life and sharpening the Fermi paradox | journal= Acta Astronautica | year= 2013 | volume= 89 | pages= 1–13 | publisher= Future of Humanity Institute, Philosophy Department, Oxford University| doi= 10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.04.002 | bibcode= 2013AcAau..89....1A }}</ref>

==Implementation==
Building colonies in space would require access to water, food, space, people, construction materials, energy, transportation, [[communication]]s, [[life support system|life support]], [[simulated gravity]], [[radiation]] protection, migration, governance and capital investment. It is likely the colonies would be located near the necessary physical resources. The practice of [[space architecture]] seeks to transform spaceflight from a heroic test of human endurance to a normality within the bounds of comfortable experience. As is true of other frontier-opening endeavors, the capital investment necessary for space colonization would probably come from governments,<ref>{{cite journal |author=Hickman |first=John |date=November 1999 |title=The Political Economy of Very Large Space Projects |url=http://www.jetpress.org/volume4/space.htm |url-status=live |journal=Journal of Evolution and Technology |volume=4 |issn=1541-0099 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131204190958/http://www.jetpress.org/volume4/space.htm |archive-date=4 December 2013 |access-date=14 December 2013}}</ref> an argument made by John Hickman<ref>{{cite book |first=John |last=Hickman |date=2010 |title=Reopening the Space Frontier |publisher=Common Ground |isbn=978-1-86335-800-2}}</ref> and [[Neil deGrasse Tyson]].<ref>{{cite book|first=Neil deGrasse |last=Tyson |date=2012 |title=Space Chronicles: Facing the Ultimate Frontier |publisher=W.W. Norton & Company |isbn=978-0-393-08210-4}}</ref>

===Life support===
{{Further|Effect of spaceflight on the human body|Space medicine|Space food}}

[[File:Mars Food Production - Bisected.jpg|alt=|thumb|upright=1.2|Depiction of [[NASA]]'s plans to grow food on [[Mars]]]]

In space settlements, a life support system must recycle or import all the nutrients without "crashing." The closest terrestrial analogue to space life support is possibly that of a [[nuclear submarine]]. Nuclear submarines use mechanical life support systems to support humans for months without surfacing, and this same basic technology could presumably be employed for space use. However, nuclear submarines run "open loop"—extracting oxygen from seawater, and typically dumping [[carbon dioxide]] overboard, although they recycle existing oxygen.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=P20100106003-200911-201004190023-201004190023-1642-1650|title=A Novel Application of the SAWD-Sabatier-SPE Integrated System for CO2 Removal and O2 Regeneration in Submarine Cabins during Prolonged Voyages|last=Huang|first=Zhi|website=Airiti Library|access-date=10 September 2018}}</ref> Another commonly proposed life-support system is a [[closed ecological system]] such as [[Biosphere 2]].<ref>{{cite book | title=Manmade Closed Ecological Systems | first1= I. I. |last1=Gitelson | first2= G. M. |last2=Lisovsky | first3= R. D. |last3=MacElroy | publisher= [[Taylor & Francis]] |date=2003 | isbn = 0-415-29998-5}}</ref>

==== Solutions to health risks ====
{{See also|Bioastronautics}}
Although there are many physical, mental, and emotional health risks for future colonists and pioneers, solutions have been proposed to correct these problems. [[Mars500]], [[HI-SEAS]], and SMART-OP represent efforts to help reduce the effects of loneliness and confinement for long periods of time. Keeping contact with family members, celebrating holidays, and maintaining cultural identities all had an impact on minimizing the deterioration of mental health.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://anxiety.psych.ucla.edu/nasa-study-stress-management-and-resilience-training-for-optimal-performance-smart-op|title=NASA Study: Stress Management and Resilience Training for Optimal Performance (SMART-OP) – Anxiety and Depression Research Center at UCLA|language=en-US|access-date=4 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404154812/https://anxiety.psych.ucla.edu/nasa-study-stress-management-and-resilience-training-for-optimal-performance-smart-op|archive-date=4 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> There are also health tools in development to help astronauts reduce anxiety, as well as helpful tips to reduce the spread of germs and bacteria in a closed environment.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://phys.org/news/2017-09-e-mental-health-tool-key-astronauts.html|title=E-mental health tool may be key for astronauts to cope with anxiety, depression in space|website=Phys.org|language=en-us|access-date=4 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404154812/https://phys.org/news/2017-09-e-mental-health-tool-key-astronauts.html|archive-date=4 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> Radiation risk may be reduced for astronauts by frequent monitoring and focusing work to minimize time away from shielding.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |title=Keeping Astronauts Healthy in Space |url=https://www.nasa.gov/vision/space/travelinginspace/30sept_spacemedicine.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190202103324/https://www.nasa.gov/vision/space/travelinginspace/30sept_spacemedicine.html |archive-date=2 February 2019 |access-date=5 March 2019 |website=NASA.gov |publisher=NASA |language=en}}</ref> Future space agencies can also ensure that every colonist would have a mandatory amount of daily exercise to prevent degradation of muscle.<ref name=":0" />

====Radiation protection====
{{see also|Health threat from cosmic rays}}

[[Cosmic rays]] and [[solar flare]]s create a lethal radiation environment in space. In orbit around certain planets with magnetospheres (including Earth), the [[Van Allen belts]] make living above the atmosphere difficult. To protect life, settlements must be surrounded by sufficient mass to absorb most incoming radiation, unless magnetic or plasma radiation shields are developed.<ref name = spacecraftshielding>[http://engineering.dartmouth.edu/~simon_g_shepherd/research/Shielding/ Spacecraft Shielding] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110928223044/http://engineering.dartmouth.edu/~simon_g_shepherd/research/Shielding/ |date=28 September 2011 }} engineering.dartmouth.edu. Retrieved 3 May 2011.</ref> In the case of Van Allen belts, these could be drained using orbiting tethers<ref name="mirnov1996">{{cite journal |last1=Mirnov |first1=Vladimir |last2=Üçer |first2=Defne |last3=Danilov |first3=Valentin |author-link3=Valentin Danilov |date=10–15 November 1996 |title=High-Voltage Tethers For Enhanced Particle Scattering In Van Allen Belts |journal=APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts |volume=38 |pages=7 |bibcode=1996APS..DPP..7E06M |oclc=205379064 |id=Abstract #7E.06}}</ref> or radio waves.<ref>{{Cite web |title=NASA Finds Lightning Clears Safe Zone in Earth's Radiation Belt - NASA |url=https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-finds-lightning-clears-safe-zone-in-earths-radiation-belt/ |access-date=11 December 2023 |language=en-US}}</ref>

Passive mass shielding of four metric tons per square meter of surface area will reduce radiation dosage to several [[Sievert#Yearly dose examples|mSv]] or less annually, well below the rate of some populated [[Background radiation#Natural background radiation|high natural background areas]] on Earth.<ref>NASA SP-413 [http://settlement.arc.nasa.gov/75SummerStudy/5appendE.html Space Settlements: A Design Study. Appendix E Mass Shielding] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130227031349/http://settlement.arc.nasa.gov//75SummerStudy/5appendE.html |date=27 February 2013 }} Retrieved 3 May 2011.</ref> This can be leftover material (slag) from processing lunar soil and asteroids into oxygen, metals, and other useful materials. However, it represents a significant obstacle to manoeuvering vessels with such massive bulk (mobile spacecraft being particularly likely to use less massive active shielding).<ref name = spacecraftshielding/> Inertia would necessitate powerful thrusters to start or stop rotation, or electric motors to spin two massive portions of a vessel in opposite senses. Shielding material can be stationary around a rotating interior.

====Psychological adjustment====
The monotony and loneliness that comes from a prolonged space mission can leave astronauts susceptible to cabin fever or having a psychotic break. Moreover, lack of sleep, fatigue, and work overload can affect an astronaut's ability to perform well in an environment such as space where every action is critical.<ref>Clynes, Manfred E. and Nathan S. Kline, (1960) "Cyborgs and Space," Astronautics, September, pp.&nbsp;26–27 and 74–76.</ref>

===Law, governance, and sovereignty===
{{Main|Space law|Space policy|Common heritage of humanity|Extraterrestrial real estate}}
A range of different models of transplanetary or extraterrestrial governance have been sketched or proposed. Often envisioning the need for a fresh or independent extraterrestrial governance, particularly in the void left by the contemporarily criticized lack of space governance and inclusivity.

{{anchor|Exonationalism}}It has been argued that space colonialism would, similarly to terrestrial [[settler colonialism]], produce colonial national identities.<ref name="Eller 2022 pp. 148–160">{{cite journal |last=Eller |first=Jack David |date=15 September 2022 |title=Space Colonization and Exonationalism: On the Future of Humanity and Anthropology |journal=Humans |volume=2 |issue=3 |pages=148–160 |doi=10.3390/humans2030010 |issn=2673-9461 |doi-access=free}}</ref>

[[Federalism]] has been studied as a remedy of such distant and autonomous communities.<ref name="u501">{{cite book | last=Crawford | first=Ian A. | title=The Meaning of Liberty Beyond Earth | chapter=Interplanetary Federalism: Maximising the Chances of Extraterrestrial Peace, Diversity and Liberty | series=Space and Society | publisher=Springer International Publishing | publication-place=Cham | date=2015 | isbn=978-3-319-09566-0 | doi=10.1007/978-3-319-09567-7_13 | pages=199–218}}</ref>

Space activity is legally based on the [[Outer Space Treaty]], the main international treaty. But [[space law]] has become a larger legal field, which includes other international agreements such as the significantly less ratified [[Moon Treaty]] and diverse national laws.

Many articles of the Outer Space Treaty prevent the legal colonization of outer space.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Parkita |first=Piotr Filip |date=2025-04-11 |title=Tomorrow for which we are not prepared. Why is the Outer Space Treaty opposed to the idea of colonizing Mars? |url=https://journals.law.harvard.edu/ilj/2025/04/tomorrow-for-which-we-are-not-prepared-why-is-the-outer-space-treaty-opposed-to-the-idea-of-colonizing-mars/ |website=Harvard International Law Journal |language=en-US}}</ref> The Outer Space Treaty established the basic ramifications for space activity in article one: "The exploration and use of outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, shall be carried out for the benefit and in the interests of all countries, irrespective of their degree of economic or scientific development, and shall be the province of all mankind." And continued in article two by stating: "Outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means."<ref name=unoda>{{cite web | url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/outer_space | title = Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies | access-date = 7 November 2020 | publisher= [[United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs]]}}</ref>

The development of international space law has revolved much around outer space being defined as [[common heritage of mankind]]. The ''Magna Carta of Space'' presented by William A. Hyman in 1966 framed outer space explicitly not as ''[[terra nullius]]'' but as ''[[res communis]]'', which subsequently influenced the work of the [[United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space]].<ref name="Durrani 2019"/><ref>{{cite web |author=Lock |first=Alexander |date=6 June 2015 |title=Space: The Final Frontier |url=https://blogs.bl.uk/digitisedmanuscripts/2015/06/space-the-final-frontier.html |access-date=2 November 2020 |website=The British Library – Medieval manuscripts blog}}</ref>

===Economics===
{{Main|Space-based economy}}
Space colonization can roughly be said to be possible when the necessary methods of space colonization become [[Economic behavior|cheap enough]] (such as space access by cheaper launch systems) to meet the cumulative funds that have been gathered for the purpose, in addition to estimated profits from [[commercial use of space]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Space Settlement Basics |first=Al |last=Globus |website=National Space Society |url=https://www.nss.org/settlement/nasa/Basics/wwwwh.html |access-date=19 April 2025}}</ref>

====Overcoming access-to-space barriers====
Although there are no immediate prospects for the large amounts of money required for space colonization to be available given traditional launch costs,<ref>[http://settlement.arc.nasa.gov/Basics/wwwwh.html Space Settlement Basics] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120706031203/http://settlement.arc.nasa.gov/basics/wwwwh.html |date=6 July 2012 }} by Al Globus, NASA Ames Research Center. Last Updated: 2 February 2012</ref> there is some prospect of a radical reduction to launch costs in the 2010s, which would consequently lessen the cost of any efforts in that direction. With a published price of {{USD|56.5}}{{nbsp}}million per launch of up to {{convert|13150|kg|abbr=on}} payload<ref name=sxCapabilitiesSvcs20131211>{{cite web |title=SpaceX Capabilities and Services |url=http://www.spacex.com/about/capabilities |year=2013<!-- copyright date; no other date provided --> |publisher=SpaceX |access-date=11 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131007205105/http://www.spacex.com/about/capabilities |archive-date=7 October 2013 |url-status=dead }} <!-- SpaceX refers to these prices as the "PAID IN FULL STANDARD LAUNCH PRICES (2013)" --></ref> to low Earth orbit, [[SpaceX]] [[Falcon 9]] rockets are already the "cheapest in the industry".<ref name=fp20131209/> Advancements currently being developed as part of the [[SpaceX reusable launch system development program]] to enable reusable Falcon 9s "could drop the price by an order of magnitude, sparking more space-based enterprise, which in turn would drop the cost of access to space still further through economies of scale."<ref name=fp20131209>{{cite news |last=Belfiore |first=Michael |title=The Rocketeer |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/12/02/the_rocketeer_elon_musk |access-date=11 December 2013 |newspaper=Foreign Policy |date=9 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131210233009/http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/12/02/the_rocketeer_elon_musk |archive-date=10 December 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref> If SpaceX is successful in developing the reusable technology, it would be expected to "have a major impact on the cost of access to space", and change the increasingly [[competition (economics)|competitive market]] in space launch services.<ref name="bbc20130930">{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-24331860 |title=Recycled rockets: SpaceX calls time on expendable launch vehicles |work=BBC News |last=Amos |first=Jonathan |date=30 September 2013 |access-date=2 October 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131003085420/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-24331860 |archive-date=3 October 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref>

The [[President's Commission on Implementation of United States Space Exploration Policy]] suggested that an [[Inducement prize contest|inducement prize]] should be established, perhaps by government, for the achievement of space colonization, for example by offering the prize to the first organization to place humans on the Moon and sustain them for a fixed period before they return to Earth.<ref>[http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/60736main_M2M_report_small.pdf A Journey to Inspire, Innovate, and Discover], {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121010151959/http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/60736main_M2M_report_small.pdf|date=10 October 2012}}, Report of the [[President's Commission on Implementation of United States Space Exploration Policy]], June 2004.</ref>

==== Money and currency ====
Experts have debated on the possible use of money and currencies in societies that will be established in space. The Quasi Universal Intergalactic Denomination, or QUID, is a physical currency made from a space-qualified polymer [[Polytetrafluoroethylene|PTFE]] for inter-planetary travelers. QUID was designed for the foreign exchange company Travelex by scientists from Britain's National Space Centre and the University of Leicester.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.space.com/4454-scientists-design-space-currency.html|title=Scientists Design New Space Currency|last=Christensen|first=Bill|date=10 October 2007|website=Space.com|access-date=21 January 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190121232640/https://www.space.com/4454-scientists-design-space-currency.html|archive-date=21 January 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> Other possibilities include the incorporation of [[cryptocurrency]] as the primary form of currency, as suggested by [[Elon Musk]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Delbert|first=Caroline|date=29 December 2020|title=Elon Musk Says Mars Settlers Will Use Cryptocurrency, Like 'Marscoin'|url=https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/moon-mars/a35085273/elon-musk-says-mars-settlers-will-use-cryptocurrency-like-marscoin/|access-date=24 February 2021|website=Popular Mechanics|language=en-US}}</ref>

====Socio-economic issues ====
[[Human spaceflight]] has enabled only temporarily relocating a few privileged people and no permanent space migrants.

The societal motivation for space migration has been questioned as rooted in colonialism, questioning the fundamentals and inclusivity of space colonization. Highlighting the need to reflect on such socio-economic issues beside the technical challenges for implementation.<ref name="m794">{{cite journal | last=Shaw | first=Debra Benita | title=The Way Home: Space Migration and Disorientation | journal=New Formations: A Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics | publisher=Lawrence & Wishart | volume=107 | issue=107 | date=15 February 2023 | issn=1741-0789 | pages=118–138 | doi=10.3898/NewF:107-8.07.2022 | url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/881496 | access-date=14 May 2024 }}</ref><ref name="l879">{{cite journal | last=Klass | first=Morton | title=Recruiting new "huddled masses" and "wretched refuse": a prolegomenon to the human colonization of space | journal=Futures | publisher=Elsevier BV | volume=32 | issue=8 | year=2000 | issn=0016-3287 | doi=10.1016/s0016-3287(00)00024-0 | pages=739–748}}</ref>

===Resources===
{{Further|Asteroid mining}}

====Raw materials====
Colonies on the Moon, Mars, asteroids, or the metal-rich planet [[Mercury (planet)|Mercury]], could extract local materials. The Moon is deficient in [[Volatile (astrogeology)|volatiles]] such as [[argon]], [[helium]] and compounds of [[carbon]], [[hydrogen]] and [[nitrogen]]. The LCROSS impacter was targeted at the [[Cabeus (crater)|Cabeus crater]] which was chosen as having a high concentration of water for the Moon. A plume of material erupted in which some water was detected. Mission chief scientist Anthony Colaprete estimated that the Cabeus crater contains material with 1% water or possibly more.<ref>{{Cite news | url=http://www.sfgate.com/science/article/NASA-s-moon-blast-called-a-smashing-success-3213973.php | work=The San Francisco Chronicle | first=David | last=Perlman | title=NASA's moon blast called a smashing success | date=10 October 2009 | access-date=19 July 2015 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150721235224/http://www.sfgate.com/science/article/NASA-s-moon-blast-called-a-smashing-success-3213973.php | archive-date=21 July 2015 | url-status=live }}</ref> Water [[ice]] should also be in other permanently shadowed craters near the lunar poles. Although helium is present only in low concentrations on the Moon, where it is deposited into [[regolith]] by the solar wind, an estimated million tons of He-3 exists over all.<ref>{{cite web|title=The Second Moon Race: It's the USA vs. China vs. India vs. ... Nigeria?|url=http://www.satnews.com/stories2007/4588/ |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20120308151604/http://www.satnews.com/stories2007/4588/|archive-date=8 March 2012}}</ref> It also has industrially significant [[oxygen]], [[silicon]], and metals such as [[iron]], [[aluminium]], and [[titanium]].

Launching materials from Earth is expensive, so bulk materials for colonies could come from the Moon, a [[near-Earth object]] (NEO), [[Phobos (moon)|Phobos]], or [[Deimos (moon)|Deimos]]. The benefits of using such sources include: a lower gravitational force, no [[Drag (physics)|atmospheric drag]] on cargo vessels, and no biosphere to damage. Many NEOs contain substantial amounts of metals. Underneath a drier outer crust (much like [[oil shale]]), some other NEOs are inactive comets which include billions of tons of water ice and [[kerogen]] hydrocarbons, as well as some nitrogen compounds.<ref>{{cite conference |title=Discovery of Abundant, Accessible Hydrocarbons nearly Everywhere in the Solar System |last1= Zuppero|first1= Anthony |year= 1996 |publisher= [[American Society of Civil Engineers|ASCE]] |book-title= Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Space '96 |doi= 10.1061/40177(207)107|isbn= 0-7844-0177-2}}</ref>

Farther out, [[Colonization of the outer Solar System#Jupiter trojans|Jupiter's Trojan asteroids]] are thought to be rich in water ice and other volatiles.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Sanders|first=Robert|title=Binary asteroid in Jupiter's orbit may be icy comet from solar system's infancy|date=1 February 2006|publisher=UC Berkeley|url=http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2006/02/01_patroclus.shtml|access-date=25 May 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181211102116/https://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2006/02/01_patroclus.shtml|archive-date=11 December 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>

[[Recycling]] of some raw materials would almost certainly be necessary.

====Energy====
[[Solar energy]] in orbit is abundant, reliable, and is commonly used to power satellites today. There is no night in free space, and no clouds or atmosphere to block sunlight. Light intensity obeys an [[inverse-square law]]. So the solar energy available at distance ''d'' from the Sun is ''E'' = 1367/''d''<sup>2</sup> W/m<sup>2</sup>, where ''d'' is measured in [[astronomical unit]]s (AU) and 1367 watts/m<sup>2</sup> is the energy available at the distance of Earth's orbit from the Sun, 1 AU.<ref>McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science & Technology, 8th Edition 1997; vol. 16, p. 654.</ref>

In the weightlessness and vacuum of space, high temperatures for industrial processes can easily be achieved in [[solar ovens]] with huge parabolic reflectors made of metallic foil with very lightweight support structures. Flat mirrors to reflect sunlight around radiation shields into living areas (to avoid line-of-sight access for cosmic rays, or to make the Sun's image appear to move across their "sky") or onto crops are even lighter and easier to build.

Large solar power photovoltaic cell arrays or thermal power plants would be needed to meet the electrical power needs of the settlers' use. In developed parts of Earth, electrical consumption can average 1 kilowatt/person (or roughly 10 [[watt-hour|megawatt-hours]] per person per year.)<ref>[http://www.unescap.org/esd/energy/information/ElectricPower/1999-2000/access.htm UNESCAP Electric Power in Asia and the Pacific], {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110213083253/http://www.unescap.org/esd/energy/information/ElectricPower/1999-2000/access.htm|date=13 February  2011}}.</ref> These power plants could be at a short distance from the main structures if wires are used to transmit the power, or much farther away with [[wireless power transmission]].

A major export of the initial space settlement designs was anticipated to be large [[solar power satellite]]s (SPS) that would use wireless power transmission (phase-locked [[microwave]] beams or lasers emitting wavelengths that special solar cells convert with high efficiency) to send power to locations on Earth, or to colonies on the Moon or other locations in space. For locations on Earth, this method of getting power is extremely benign, with zero emissions and far less ground area required per watt than for conventional solar panels. Once these satellites are primarily built from lunar or asteroid-derived materials, the price of SPS electricity could be lower than energy from fossil fuel or nuclear energy; replacing these would have significant benefits such as the elimination of [[greenhouse gases]] and [[nuclear waste]] from electricity generation.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2015/ph240/gaertner1/|title=Solar vs. Traditional Energy in Homes|website=large.stanford.edu |first=Ryan|last=Gaertner|date=9 November 2015|access-date=26 February 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181024050207/http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2015/ph240/gaertner1/|archive-date=24 October 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>

Transmitting solar energy wirelessly from the Earth to the Moon and back is also an idea proposed for the benefit of space colonization and energy resources. Physicist Dr. David Criswell, who worked for NASA during the Apollo missions, proposed the idea of using power beams to transfer energy from space. These beams, microwaves with a wavelength of about 12&nbsp;cm, would be almost untouched as they travel through the atmosphere. They could also be aimed at more industrial areas to keep away from humans or animal activities.<ref name="i2massociates.com">{{Cite web |url=http://www.i2massociates.com/downloads/AAPG_Memoir_101-July18-2012.pdf |title=Nuclear Power and Associated Environmental Issues in the Transition of Exploration and Mining on Earth to the Development of Off-World Natural Resources in the 21st Century |access-date=18 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150214125331/http://i2massociates.com/downloads/AAPG_Memoir_101-July18-2012.pdf |archive-date=14 February 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref> This would allow for safer and more reliable methods of transferring solar energy.

In 2008, scientists were able to send a 20 watt microwave signal from a mountain on the island of Maui to the island of Hawaii.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Dance|first=Amber|date=16 September 2008|title=Beaming energy from space|journal=Nature|doi=10.1038/news.2008.1109|issn=0028-0836}}</ref> Since then [[JAXA]] and Mitsubishi have been working together on a $21&nbsp;billion project to place satellites in orbit which could generate up to 1 gigawatt of energy.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2011-06/satellites-could-gather-energy-sun-and-beam-it-down-earth/ |title=Space Based Solar Power |first=Corey|last=Binns|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170927054041/http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2011-06/satellites-could-gather-energy-sun-and-beam-it-down-earth |archive-date=27 September 2017|publisher=Popular Science| date=2 June 2011}}</ref> These are the next advancements being done today to transmit energy wirelessly for space-based solar energy.

However, the value of SPS power delivered wirelessly to other locations in space will typically be far higher than to Earth. Otherwise, the means of generating the power would need to be included with these projects and pay the heavy penalty of Earth launch costs. Therefore, other than proposed demonstration projects for power delivered to Earth,<ref name="NatSecSpaceOffice2007">{{cite web |date=10 October 2007 |title=Space-Based Solar Power As an Opportunity for Strategic Security: Phase 0 Architecture Feasibility Study |url=https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA473860.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220926134325/https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA473860.pdf |archive-date=26 September 2022 |access-date=26 September 2022 |website= |publisher=U.S. National Security Space Office}}</ref> the first priority for SPS electricity is likely to be locations in space, such as communications satellites, fuel depots or "orbital tugboat" boosters transferring cargo and passengers between low Earth orbit (LEO) and other orbits such as [[geosynchronous orbit]] (GEO), [[lunar orbit]] or [[Highly elliptical orbit|highly-eccentric Earth orbit]] (HEEO).<ref name="Lewis-1996"/>{{rp|132}} The system will also rely on satellites and receiving stations on Earth to convert the energy into electricity. Because this energy can be transmitted easily from dayside to nightside, power would be reliable 24/7.<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.wired.co.uk/article/moon-solar-energy-power |title=Beaming solar energy from the Moon could solve Earth's energy crisis |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171011044359/http://www.wired.co.uk/article/moon-solar-energy-power |archive-date=11 October 2017 |date=29 March 2017 |magazine=Wired |first=David |last=Warmflash}}</ref>

[[Nuclear power]] is sometimes proposed for colonies located on the Moon or on Mars, as the supply of solar energy is too discontinuous in these locations; the Moon has nights of two Earth weeks in duration. Mars has nights, relatively high gravity, and an atmosphere featuring [[Climate of Mars#Effect of dust storms|large dust storms]] to cover and degrade solar panels. Also, Mars' greater distance from the Sun (1.52 astronomical units, AU) means that only ''1/1.52<sup>2</sup>'' or about 43% of the solar energy is available at Mars compared with Earth orbit.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091004020806.htm |title='Trash Can' Nuclear Reactors Could Power Human Outpost On Moon Or Mars |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170918154323/https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091004020806.htm|archive-date=18 September 2017 |date=4 October 2009 |website=ScienceDaily}}</ref> Another method would be transmitting energy wirelessly to the lunar or Martian colonies from solar power satellites (SPSs) as described above; the difficulties of generating power in these locations make the relative advantages of SPSs much greater there than for power beamed to locations on Earth. In order to also be able to fulfill the requirements of a Moon base and energy to supply life support, maintenance, communications, and research, a combination of both nuclear and solar energy may be used in the first colonies.<ref name="i2massociates.com"/>

For both solar thermal and nuclear power generation in airless environments, such as the Moon and space, and to a lesser extent the very thin Martian atmosphere, one of the main difficulties is dispersing the [[Carnot cycle|inevitable heat generated]]. This requires fairly large radiator areas.

===Self-sustainment===
{{see also|von Neumann probe|Self-replicating machine|molecular nanotechnology}}

====In situ manufacturing====
[[Space manufacturing]] could enable self-replication. Some consider it the ultimate goal because it would allow an [[exponential growth|exponential]] increase in colonies, while eliminating costs to, and dependence on, Earth.<ref>{{Cite magazine |first=Ian |last=Crawford |title=Where are they? |magazine=Scientific American |volume=283 |number=1 |date=July 2000 |pages=38–43 |jstor=26058784 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/26058784}}</ref> It could be argued that the establishment of such a colony would be Earth's first act of [[self-replication]].<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Margulis | first1 = Lynn | author-link = Lynn Margulis | last2 = Guerrero | first2 = Ricardo | year = 1995 | title = Life as a planetary phenomenon: the colonization of Mars | journal = Microbiología | volume = 11 | pages = 173–84 | pmid = 11539563 }}</ref> Intermediate goals include colonies that expect only information from Earth (science, engineering, entertainment) and colonies that just require periodic supply of light weight objects, such as [[integrated circuit]]s, medicines, [[DNA|genetic material]] and tools.

====Sustaining a population====
In 2002, the [[Anthropology|anthropologist]] [[John H. Moore]] estimated<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1936-magic-number-for-space-pioneers-calculated |title="Magic number" for space pioneers calculated |date=15 February 2002 |work=New Scientist |first=Damian |last=Carrington}}</ref> that a population of 150–180 would permit a stable society to exist for 60 to 80 generations—equivalent to 2,000 years.

Assuming a journey of 6,300 years, the astrophysicist Frédéric Marin and the particle physicist Camille Beluffi calculated that the minimum viable population for a [[generation ship]] to reach [[Proxima Centauri]] would be 98 settlers at the beginning of the mission (then the crew will breed until reaching a stable population of several hundred settlers within the ship).<ref>{{cite journal |arxiv=1806.03856|last1=Marin|first1=F|title=Computing the minimal crew for a multi-generational space travel towards Proxima Centauri b|journal=Journal of the British Interplanetary Society|volume=71|pages=45|last2=Beluffi|first2=C|year=2018|bibcode=2018JBIS...71...45M}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |url=https://www.technologyreview.com/2018/06/22/142160/this-is-how-many-people-wed-have-to-send-to-proxima-centauri-to-make-sure-someone-actually/ |magazine=[[MIT Technology Review]] |title=This is how many people we'd have to send to Proxima Centauri to make sure someone actually arrives |date=22 June 2018 |quote="We can then conclude that, under the parameters used for those simulations, a minimum crew of 98 settlers is needed for a 6,300-year multi-generational space journey towards Proxima Centauri b," say Marin and Beluffi.}}</ref>

In 2020, Jean-Marc Salotti proposed a method to determine the minimum number of settlers to survive on an extraterrestrial world. It is based on the comparison between the required time to perform all activities and the working time of all human resources. For Mars, 110 individuals would be required.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Salotti |first1=Jean-Marc |title=Minimum Number of Settlers for Survival on Another Planet |journal=Scientific Reports |date=16 June 2020 |volume=10 |issue=1 |article-number=9700 |doi=10.1038/s41598-020-66740-0 |pmid=32546782 |pmc=7297723 |bibcode=2020NatSR..10.9700S |doi-access=free }}</ref>

==Advocacy==
{{See also|Space advocacy}}
Several private companies have announced plans toward the [[colonization of Mars]]. Among entrepreneurs leading the call for space colonization are Elon Musk, [[Dennis Tito]] and [[Bas Lansdorp]].<ref>{{cite news |first=Nicola |last=Clark |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/09/business/global/reality-tv-for-the-red-planet.html |title=Reality TV for the Red Planet |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170629013428/http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/09/business/global/reality-tv-for-the-red-planet.html|archive-date=29 June 2017 |work=The New York Times |date=8 March 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/02/130222-manned-mission-mars-tito-space-science/ |title=Businessman Dennis Tito Financing Manned Mission to Mars |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130301012114/http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/02/130222-manned-mission-mars-tito-space-science/ |archive-date=1 March 2013|first=Jane J. |last=Lee |website=National Geographic News |date=22 February 2013}}</ref>

===Involved organizations===
Organizations that advocate for space colonization include:
* [[Blue Origin]] and [[Jeff Bezos]] are pursuing plans for space colonization starting with a base on the moon. Blue Origin is developing the New Glenn launcher to significantly reduce access to space cost with use of a re-useable booster and is building the Blue Moon lunar lander.<ref>{{cite news|title=Blue Origin, Jeff Bezos unveils plans for space colonization |first1=Soo |last1=Youn |first2=Christine |last2=Theodorou
|date=9 May 2019 |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Business/blue-origin-jeff-bezos-unveils-lunar-lander-mission/story?id=62941981 |publisher=ABC News|access-date=15 April 2025}}</ref>
* The [[Mars Society]] promotes Robert Zubrin's [[Mars Direct]] plan and the settlement of Mars.
* The [[National Space Society]] (NSS) is an organization with the vision of people living and working in thriving communities beyond the Earth. The NSS also maintains an extensive library of full-text articles and books on space settlement.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nss.org/settlement/library.html |title=NSS Space Settlement Library |publisher=NSS.org |date=16 December 2011 |access-date=14 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110612005613/http://www.nss.org/settlement/library.html |archive-date=12 June 2011 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
* The [[Space Frontier Foundation]] performs [[space advocacy]] including strong [[free market]], [[capitalism|capitalist]] views about space development.
* The [[Space Settlement Institute]] is searching for ways to make space colonization happen within a lifetime.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.space-settlement-institute.org|title=The Space Settlement Institute|work=space-settlement-institute.org|access-date=13 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150428202903/http://www.space-settlement-institute.org/|archive-date=28 April 2015|url-status=live}}</ref>
* [[SpaceX]] is developing extensive [[SpaceX Mars transportation infrastructure|spaceflight transportation infrastructure]] with the express purpose of enabling long-term human settlement of Mars.<ref name=trati20181224>{{cite news |last=Ralph |first=Eric |url=https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-elon-musk-starship-prototype-three-raptors-mirror-finish/ |title=SpaceX CEO Elon Musk: Starship prototype to have 3 Raptors and "mirror finish" |work=Teslarati |date=24 December 2018 |access-date=30 December 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181224133103/https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-elon-musk-starship-prototype-three-raptors-mirror-finish/ |archive-date=24 December 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=sn20181224>
{{cite news |last=Foust|first=Jeff |url=https://spacenews.com/musk-teases-new-details-about-redesigned-next-generation-launch-system/ |title=Musk teases new details about redesigned next-generation launch system |work=[[SpaceNews]] |date=24 December 2018 |access-date=27 December 2018 }}</ref>
* The [[Space Studies Institute]] funds the study of outer space settlements, especially [[O'Neill cylinder]]s.
* The [[Alliance to Rescue Civilization]] plans to establish [[backup]]s of human civilization on the Moon and other locations away from Earth.
* The [[British Interplanetary Society]] (BIS) promotes ideas for the exploration and use of space, including a [[Project Boreas|Mars colony]], future propulsion systems (see [[Project Daedalus]]), terraforming, and locating other habitable worlds.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Journal of the British Interplanetary Society |url=https://www.bis-space.com/publications/jbis/ |access-date=26 September 2022 |website=The British Interplanetary Society |language=en-GB}}</ref> In June 2013 the BIS began the SPACE project to re-examine Gerard O'Neill's 1970s space colony studies in light of the advances made since then. The progress of this effort were detailed in a special edition of the BIS journal in September 2019.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal |date=September 2019 |title=BIS SPACE Project special issue |url=https://www.bis-space.com/membership/jbis/2019/JBIS-v72-no09-September-October-2019_dk64ll.pdf |journal=[[Journal of the British Interplanetary Society]] |volume=72 |issue=9/10}}</ref>
* [[Asgardia (nation)]] – an organization searching to circumvent limitations placed by [[Outer Space Treaty]].
*The [[Cyprus Space Exploration Organisation]] promotes space exploration and colonization, and fosters collaboration in space.

===Experiments with terrestrial analogues===
{{See also|Mars analog habitat|List of Mars analogs}}
[[File:Wiki bio2 sunset 001.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Biosphere 2 is a test habitat on Earth for space flight.]]
Many [[space agency|space agencies]] build "testbeds", which are facilities on Earth for testing advanced life support systems, but these are designed for long duration [[human spaceflight]], not permanent colonization.

*The most famous attempt to build an analogue to a self-sufficient settlement is [[Biosphere 2]], which attempted to duplicate Earth's biosphere. 
*[[BIOS-3]] is another [[closed ecosystem]], completed in 1972 in [[Krasnoyarsk]], [[Siberia]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.ecowatch.com/the-worlds-largest-earth-science-experiment-biosphere-2-1882107636.html|title=The World's Largest Earth Science Experiment: Biosphere 2|date=16 October 2015 |work=EcoWatch|access-date=14 August 2018|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180814040305/https://www.ecowatch.com/the-worlds-largest-earth-science-experiment-biosphere-2-1882107636.html|archive-date=14 August 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>
*The [[Mars Desert Research Station]] has a habitat for similar reasons, but the surrounding climate is not strictly inhospitable.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/12/exploring-mars-utah-mock-mission-simulation-space-science/|title=8 Amazing Places You Can Visit 'Mars' on Earth|first=Nadia |last=Drake |date=12 December 2016|access-date=13 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180814040445/https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/12/exploring-mars-utah-mock-mission-simulation-space-science/|archive-date=14 August 2018|url-status=dead}}</ref>
*[[Devon Island]] [[Flashline Mars Arctic Research Station|Mars Arctic Research Station]], can also provide some practice for off-world outpost construction and operation.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/stories/devon-island-close-mars-you-may-get|title=Devon Island is as close to Mars as you may get|work=MNN - Mother Nature Network|access-date=13 August 2018|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180814040256/https://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/stories/devon-island-close-mars-you-may-get|archive-date=14 August 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>

==Influence of science fiction==
{{See also|Space travel in science fiction}}

[[Image:TerraformedMarsGlobeRealistic.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|An artist's view of a terraformed Mars centered on [[Valles Marineris]]. [[Tharsis]] is visible on the left side. This transformation was imagined in science fiction author [[Kim Stanley Robinson]]'s [[Mars Trilogy]] but also studied by scientists including [[Robert Zubrin]].<ref>{{cite report |title=Technological Requirements for Terraforming Mars |first1=Robert M. |last1=Zubrin |first2=Christopher P. |last2=McKay |date=2003 |url=https://marspapers.org/paper/Zubrin_1993_3.pdf |publisher=American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. |access-date=21 April 2025}}</ref> Robinson and Zubrin are both members of the Mars Society.|alt=artists view of [[Terraforming of Mars]].]] 

Space colonization is a recurring theme in [[science fiction]].<ref name="StablefordColonisation">{{Cite book |last=Stableford |first=Brian |author-link=Brian Stableford |title=[[Science Fact and Science Fiction: An Encyclopedia]] |date=2006 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |isbn=978-0-415-97460-8 |pages=93–95 |language=en |chapter=Colonisation |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uefwmdROKTAC&pg=PA93}}</ref> NASA began to assess space colonization issues as early as 1975 with their Space Settlements Design Study. The report directly acknowledges the foundation of various ideas for colonization in science fiction. It quotes author Robert Salkeld and highlights the role of the precursors of science fiction alongside the founders of astronautics, where for example Jules Verne rubs shoulders with Constantin Tsiolkovsky.<ref>{{cite report|title=Space Settlements: A Design Study |chapter=1. The Colonization of Space|first1=Richard D. |last1=Johnson |first2=Charles |last2=Holbrow |url=http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2016/ph240/martelaro2/docs/nasa-sp-413.pdf |publisher=NASA |access-date=21 April 2025}}</ref>

Indeed, colonization as a fictional theme and colonization as a research project are not independent. Research feeds fiction and fiction sometimes inspires research. Many of the most fascinating ideas in science originated not in the laboratory but in the minds of such science fiction writers as Arthur C. Clarke and Ray Bradbury. Clarke's 1945 article on communications satellites was the original idea behind modern communications satellites.<ref>{{cite magazine|title=May 25, 1945: Sci-Fi Author Predicts Future by Inventing It |first=Dylan |last=Tweney |date=25 May 2011 |url=https://www.wired.com/2011/05/0525arthur-c-clarke-proposes-geostationary-satellites/ |magazine=Wired |access-date=21 April 2025}}</ref> Bradbury's [[The Martian Chronicles]] explores the exploration and settlement of Mars and has been attributed as the main inspiration behind NASA's many missions to Mars.<ref>{{cite web|title=Bradbury Revered In Space Exploration Community|date=7 June 2012 |first=Renee |last=Montagne |url=https://www.npr.org/2012/06/07/154485146/remembering-ray-bradbury |website=NPR |access-date=21 April 2025}}</ref> Communicators and tricorders from the science fiction of Star Trek are said to be inspirations for cell phones and wireless medical triage devices.<ref>{{cite web |title=Live long and prosper: Star Trek-inspired medical devices on agenda at UND |date= 1 October 2024 |first= Adam |last=Kurtz |url=https://blogs.und.edu/und-today/2024/10/c2ship-annual-meeting-brings-future-medical-technology-research-to-und/ |website=University of North Dakota |access-date=21 April 2025}}</ref><ref name =klimek>{{Cite magazine|last=Klimek|first=Chris|date=8 September 2016|title='Star Trek' at 50: How the Sci-Fi TV Show Changed Everything |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/tv/tv-news/star-trek-at-50-how-the-sci-fi-tv-show-changed-everything-104127/|access-date=19 April 2025|magazine=Rolling Stone|language=en-US}}</ref> Fiction inspired innovation and invention to develop new technologies. Communications, governance principles, and advanced technological devices, all speculated by science fiction, are all precursors to survival of an extraterrestrial colony.<ref>{{cite book|first=Robert |last=Bly |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LH2gqgGm7DEC |title=The Science in Science Fiction: 83 SF Predictions that Became Scientific Reality |publisher=BenBella Books, Inc. |date=2005|isbn=978-1-932100-48-8 |access-date=21 April 2025}}</ref> The European Space Agency ITSF project (Innovative Technologies in Science Fiction for Space Applications) study offers similar consideration for the cross-fertilization between fiction and science.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.esa.int/esapub/br/br176/br176.pdf |title=Innovative Technologies from Science Fiction for Space Applications|website=ESA |access-date=21 April 2025}}</ref>

[[Science fiction]] writer [[Norman Spinrad]] highlights the role of science fiction as a visionary force that spawned the conquest of space, a term he believes betrays its imperialist tendencies, and the colonization of space.<ref name="spinrad-1999">{{cite news |title=From Jules Verne to Star Wars - Too high the moon |first=Norman |last=Spinrad |date=July 1999 |url=https://mondediplo.com/1999/07/14star |publisher=Le Monde diplomatique |access-date=21 April 2025}}</ref> 
He also shows that political scientist and science fiction writer Jerry Pournelle, in wanting to revive the conquest of space for this purpose in the early 1980s, actually launched the [[Reagan administration]]'s Strategic Defense Initiative project, which he considers a failure, because instead of the military program reviving the space program, the opposite happens: the $40 billion cost of the program is actually taken away from the construction of a base on the Moon.<ref name="spinrad-1999"/>

One of the great names in science fiction, [[Arthur C. Clarke]], a supporter of Marshall Savage's ideas, announced in a 2001 article, the date appearing in one of his most famous titles [[2001: A Space Odyssey]], that by 2057 there would be humans on the Moon, Mars , Europa, Ganymede, Titan and in orbit around Venus, Neptune and Pluto.<ref>{{cite web|title=Arthur C. Clarke Predicts in 2001 What the World Will Look By December 31, 2100 |date= 29 January 2015 |url=https://www.openculture.com/2015/01/arthur-c-clarke-predicts-in-2001-what-the-world-will-look-by-2100.html |website=openculture.com|access-date=21 April 2025}}</ref> Contemporary science fiction has extended the colonization vision further. The TV series [[The Expanse (TV series)|The Expanse]] which is based on a series of novels of the same name by James S. A. Corey, addresses the politics and conflict of humanity hundreds of years in the future after it has colonized the solar system and Mars has become an independent military power. In Theresa Hutchin's essay on the series in 2021, comparisons are drawn between the fiction of the story and the reality of current corporate led development of space exploration activities.<ref>{{cite web|title=How 'The Expanse' Is A Cautionary Tale For Real World Space Commercialization: Excerpt |first=Theresa |last=Hitchens |date= 15 October 2021 |url=https://breakingdefense.com/2021/10/how-the-expanse-is-a-cautionary-tale-for-real-world-space-commercialization-excerpt/ |website=breakingdefense.com |access-date=21 April 2025}}</ref>

==See also==
{{Portal|Spaceflight}}
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}
* [[Billionaire space race]]
* [[Colonisation (biology)]]
* [[Colonization of Antarctica]]
* [[Directed panspermia]]
* [[Domed city]]
* [[Human presence in space]]
* [[Mars to Stay]]
* [[Megastructure]]
* [[NewSpace]]
* [[MELiSSA]]
* [[Ocean colonization]]
* [[Planetary habitability]]
* [[Solar analog]]
* [[Space archaeology]]
* [[Politics of outer space]]
* [[Spome]]
* [[Stanford torus]]
* [[Timeline of Solar System exploration]]
* [[Underground city]]
{{Div col end}}

==References==
{{reflist}}

==Further reading==
{{Library resources box}}
;Papers
* Yap, Xiao-Shan & Rakhyun E. Kim (2023). "[[doi:10.1016/j.esg.2023.100173|Towards Earth-Space Governance in a Multi-Planetary Era]]". ''Earth System Governance'', 16: 100173.
* {{cite book| last = Ferrando | first = Francesca | chapter = Why Space Migration Must be Posthuman | publisher = Springer | pages = 137–152| date = July 2016| location=New York, US| isbn = 978-3-319-39825-9 | doi = 10.1007/978-3-319-39827-3_10 | title = The Ethics of Space Exploration | series = Space and Society }}
* {{cite journal | last = Tiziani | first = Moreno | title = The Colonization of Space - An Anthropological Outlook | journal = Antrocom Online Journal of Anthropology | publisher = Antrocom | volume = 9 | pages = 225–236 | date = Jun 2013 | location = Rome, Italy | issn = 1973-2880 | url = http://www.antrocom.net/upload/sub/antrocom/090113/21-Antrocom.pdf | issue = 1 | access-date = 1 December 2013 | archive-date = 2 December 2013 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131202223755/http://www.antrocom.net/upload/sub/antrocom/090113/21-Antrocom.pdf | url-status = dead }}
* {{cite book| last = Harrison | first = Albert A. |title=Spacefaring: The Human Dimension|year=2002 |publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley, CA, US |isbn=978-0-520-23677-6}}
* {{cite book|last=Seedhouse|first=Erik|title=Lunar Outpost: The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on the Moon|year=2009 |publisher=Praxis Publishing Ltd. |location=Chichester, UK |isbn=978-0-387-09746-6 |url=https://www.springer.com/astronomy/space+exploration/book/978-0-387-09746-6 |access-date=May 31, 2025}}
* {{cite book|last=Seedhouse|first=Erik|title=Martian Outpost: The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on Mars|year=2009 |publisher=Praxis Publishing Ltd. |location=Chichester, UK |doi=10.1007/978-0-387-98191-8 |isbn=978-0-387-98190-1|url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-0-387-98191-8|access-date=May 31, 2005}}
* {{cite book| last = Cameron M. Smith | first = Evan T. Davies |title=Emigrating Beyond Earth: Human Adaptation and Space Colonization|year=2012 |publisher=Springer-Verlag |location=Berlin |isbn=978-1-4614-1164-2}}
;Video
*{{cite book| last=Rees|first=Martin|author-link=Martin J. Rees|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngrJLQjZqY4 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211211/ngrJLQjZqY4| archive-date=11 December 2021 |url-status=live|title=Brief talk on some key issues in space exploration and colonization|date=March 2017}}{{cbignore}} Posted on the official YouTube channel of ''[[Casina Pio IV]].''
*{{cite book| last=Sarmont|first=Eagle|url=https://vimeo.com/306453241|title=Opening the High Frontier|date=December 2018}} Affordable to everyone spaceflight is the key to building a spacefaring civilization. Posted on Vimeo.

{{Wikiquote}}
{{Spaceflight}}
{{Space tourism}}
{{inspace}}
{{Solar System}}
{{Space colonization}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Space Colonization}}
[[Category:Space colonization| ]]
[[Category:Astropolitics]]
[[Category:Science fiction themes]]
[[Category:Spaceflight concepts]]
[[Category:Open problems]]
[[Category:Colonialism]]
[[Category:Solar System]]