View source for Tanoan languages

{{Short description|North American aboriginal language family}}
{{Multiple issues|
{{original research|date=February 2021}}
{{more citations needed|date=March 2021}}
{{more footnotes|date=March 2021}}
}}
{{Infobox language family
| name          = Tanoan
| altname       = Kiowa–Tanoan
| region        = central [[North America]]
| familycolor   = American
| family        = One of the world's primary [[language families]]
| glotto        = kiow1265
| glottorefname = Kiowa–Tanoan
| lingua        = 64-C
| child4        = ''[[Kiowa language|Kiowa]]''
| child1        = [[Tiwa languages|Tiwa]]
| child2        = ''[[Tewa language|Tewa]]''
| child3        = ''[[Towa language|Towa]]''
| map           = Tanoan map.svg
| mapcaption    = Distribution of Tanoan languages before European contact. The Pueblo languages are at the left; the nomadic Kiowa at right.
| ancestor      = 
| glottoname    = 
| notes         = 
| speakers      = ~5,625
}}

'''Tanoan''' ({{IPAc-en|t|ə|ˈ|n|oʊ|.|ən}} {{respell|tə|NOH|ən}}), also '''Kiowa–Tanoan''' or '''Tanoan–Kiowa''', is a family of languages spoken by indigenous peoples in present-day [[New Mexico]], [[Kansas]], [[Oklahoma]], and [[Texas]].

{{Multiple image
| align = 
| direction = vertical
| total_width = 
| image1 = Pueblo Tanoan map.svg
| alt1 = 
| caption1 = Historical distribution of Pueblo Tanoan languages
| image2 = Pueblo Tanoan map (modern).svg
| caption2 = Current distribution of Pueblo Tanoan languages
}}

Most of the languages – [[Tiwa languages|Tiwa]] (Taos, Picuris, Southern Tiwa), [[Tewa language|Tewa]], and [[Towa language|Towa]] – are spoken in the Native American [[Pueblo]]s of [[New Mexico]] (with one outlier in Arizona). These were the first languages collectively given the name of ''Tanoan.'' [[Kiowa language|Kiowa]], which is a related language, is now spoken mostly in southwestern Oklahoma. The Kiowa historically inhabited areas of modern-day Texas and Oklahoma.

==Languages==
{{unreferenced section|date=March 2021}}
The Tanoan language family has seven languages in four branches:{{citation needed|date=February 2021}} {{verify source|reason=[[Talk:Tanoan langauges|see here maybe?]]|date=March 2021}}

{{clade
|label1={{nowrap|Tanoan&nbsp;}}
|1={{clade
   |1=[[Kiowa language|Kiowa]] (Ǥáuiđòᵰ꞉gyà): 20 speakers
   |label3=[[Tiwa languages|Tiwa]]
   |3={{clade
      |label1=Northern
      |1={{clade
         |1=[[Taos language|Taos]]: 800 speakers
         |2=[[Picuris language|Picuris]]: 225 speakers
         }}
      |2=[[Southern Tiwa]]: 1,600 speakers
      |3=? [[Piro Pueblo language|Piro]] {{extinct}}
      }}
   |4=[[Tewa language|Tewa]]: 1,600 speakers
   |2=[[Jemez language|Jemez]] (or Towa): 3,000 speakers
   }}
}}
Kiowa–Towa might form an intermediate branch, as might Tiwa–Tewa.

==Name==
{{Multiple issues|section=yes|
{{unreferenced section|date=March 2021}}
{{more citations needed section|date=March 2021}}
{{original research section|date=March 2021}}
{{disputed section|date=March 2021}}
}}
Tanoan has long been recognized as a major family of [[Pueblo people|Pueblo]] languages, consisting of [[Tiwa language|Tiwa]], [[Tewa language|Tewa]], and [[Towa language|Towa]]. The inclusion of [[Kiowa language|Kiowa]] into the family was at first controversial given the cultural differences between those groups. The once-nomadic [[Kiowa people]] of the Plains are culturally quite distinct from the Tiwa, Tewa, and Towa pueblos, which obscured somewhat the linguistic connection between Tanoans and Kiowans. Linguists now accept that a Tanoan family without Kiowa would be [[Paraphyly|paraphyletic]], as any ancestor of the Pueblo languages would be ancestral to Kiowa as well. Kiowa may be closer to Towa than Towa is to Tiwa–Tewa. In older texts, ''Tanoan'' and ''Kiowa–Tanoan'' were used interchangeably. Because of the cultural use of the name ''Tanoan'' as signifying several peoples who share a culture, the more explicit term ''Kiowa–Tanoan'' is now commonly used for the language family as a whole, with Tanoan being the branch that contains the languages now spoken in New Mexico and Arizona (i.e. [[Hopi-Tewa|Arizona Tewa]]).

The prehistory of the Kiowa people is little known. As a result, the history is obscure about the separation of the members of this language family into two groups ('Puebloan' and 'Plains') with radically distinct lifestyles.  {{weasel inline|date=March 2021}}  There is apparently no {{dubious|date=March 2021}} oral tradition{{according to whom|date=February 2021}} of any ancient connection between the peoples. Scholars have not determined when the peoples were connected so that the common linguistic elements could have developed. The earliest traditions and historical notices of the Kiowa record them migrating from the north and west, to the territory now associated with the tribal nation. Today this area is within the modern states of [[Texas]] and [[Oklahoma]], which they occupied from the late 18th century.

==Historical phonology==

{{Expand section|date=May 2008}}

The chart below<ref>The original [[Americanist phonetic notation|Americanist]] phonetic symbols differ from the [[International Phonetic Alphabet|IPA]]: Amer. {{angbr|c}} = IPA {{angbr IPA|ts}}, Amer {{angbr|ʒ}} = IPA {{angbr IPA|dz}}.</ref> contains the consonants of the Tanoan [[proto-language]] as reconstructed by Hale (1967) based on consonant correspondences in stem-initial position.{{citation needed|date=February 2021}}

:{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"
|- style="line-height: 1.1em;"
! colspan="2" |
! [[Labial consonant|Labial]]
! [[Apical consonant|Apical]]
! Apical<br />[[Fricated]]
! [[Velar consonant|Velar]]
! Velar<br />[[Labialization|Labial]]
! [[Glottal consonant|Glottal]]
|-
! rowspan="4" | [[Plosive consonant|Plosive]]
! <small>[[voiced]]</small>
| {{IPA|*b}} || {{IPA|*d}} || {{IPA|*dz}} || {{IPA|(*ɡ)}} || {{IPA|*ɡʷ}} ||
|-
! <small>plain</small>
| {{IPA|*p}} || {{IPA|*t}} || {{IPA|*ts}} || {{IPA|*k}} || {{IPA|*kʷ}} ||
|-
! <small>[[glottalized]]</small>
| {{IPA|*pʼ}} || {{IPA|*tʼ}} || {{IPA|*tsʼ}} || {{IPA|*kʼ}} || {{IPA|*kʷʼ}} || {{IPA|*ʔ}}
|-
! <small>[[Aspirated consonant|aspirated]]</small>
| {{IPA|*pʰ}} || {{IPA|*tʰ}} || {{IPA|*tsʰ}} || {{IPA|*kʰ}} || {{IPA|*kʷʰ}} ||
|-
! colspan="2" | [[Nasal stop|Nasal]]
| {{IPA|*m}} || {{IPA|*n}} || || || ||
|-
! colspan="2" | [[Fricative consonant|Fricative]]
| || || {{IPA|*s}} || || || {{IPA|*h}}
|-
! colspan="2" | [[Semivowel|Glide]]
| || || || || {{IPA|*w}} ||
|}

The evidence for ''{{IPA|*ɡ}}'' comes from prefixes; ''{{IPA|*ɡ}}'' has not been found in stem-initial position and thus is in parentheses above. Hale reconstructs the nasalization feature for nasal vowels. Vowel quality and prosodic features like vowel length, tone, and stress have not yet been reconstructed for the Tanoan family. Hale (1967) gives certain sets of vowel quality correspondences.

The following table illustrates the [[Linguistic reconstruction|reconstructed]]{{clarify|are these exclusively Hale's reconstructions? or an integration of many linquists work on the matter|date=February 2021}} initial consonants in Proto-Tanoan and its reflexes in the daughter languages.{{citation needed|date=February 2021}}

:{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center; line-height: 1.1em;"
|+ style="line-height: 1.5em;" | Initial consonants in proto-language and daughter languages
! rowspan="2" | Proto-Tanoan
! rowspan="2" | Tiwa
! rowspan="2" | Tewa
! rowspan="2" | Towa
! rowspan="2" | Kiowa
| rowspan="16" |
! colspan="2" | Proto-Tanoan
! rowspan="2" | Tiwa
! rowspan="2" | Tewa
! rowspan="2" | Towa
! rowspan="2" | Kiowa
|- style="font-size: x-small;"
! consonant !! environment
|-
! {{IPA|*h}}
| {{IPA|h}} || {{IPA|h}} || ∅ <ref>The null set symbol ∅ represents the lack of a consonant, i.e. the reconstructed proto-sound was deleted in the daughter language.</ref> || {{IPA|h}}
! {{IPA|*dz}} !!
| {{IPA|j}} || {{IPA|j, dʒ}} || {{IPA|z}}
| rowspan="3" | {{IPA|d}}
|-
! {{IPA|*ʔ}}
| {{IPA|ʔ}} || {{IPA|ʔ}} || {{IPA|ʔ}} || ∅
! rowspan="2" | {{IPA|*d}}
! style="font-weight: normal; font-size: x-small;" | before oral vowel
| {{IPA|l}} || {{IPA|d}} || {{IPA|d}}
|-
! {{IPA|*p}}
| {{IPA|p}} || {{IPA|p}} || {{IPA|p}} || {{IPA|p}}
! style="font-weight: normal; font-size: x-small;" | before nasal vowel
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|n}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|n}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|n}}
|-
! {{IPA|*pʼ}}
| {{IPA|pʼ}} || {{IPA|pʼ}} || {{IPA|pʼ}} || {{IPA|pʼ}}
! {{IPA|*n}} !!
| {{IPA|n}}
|-
! {{IPA|*pʰ}}
| {{IPA|pʰ}} || {{IPA|f}} || {{IPA|ɸ}} || {{IPA|pʰ}}
! {{IPA|*w}} !!
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|w}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|w}}
| {{IPA|w}}
| {{IPA|j}}
|-
! {{IPA|*b}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|m}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|m}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|m}} || {{IPA|b}}
! {{IPA|*ɡʷ}} !!
| {{IPA|kʷ}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|ɡ}}
|-
! {{IPA|*m}}
| {{IPA|m}}
! {{IPA|(*ɡ)}} !!
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|k}}
| {{IPA|ɡ}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|k}}
|-
! {{IPA|*t}}
| {{IPA|t}} || {{IPA|t}} || {{IPA|t}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|t}}
! {{IPA|*k}} !!
| {{IPA|k}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|k}}
|-
! {{IPA|*ts}}
| {{IPA|tʃ}} <ref name="apicalfricated"/> || {{IPA|ts}} || {{IPA|s}}
! {{IPA|*kʷ}} !!
| {{IPA|kʷ}} || {{IPA|kʷ}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|ɡ}}
|-
! {{IPA|*tʰ}}
| {{IPA|tʰ}} || {{IPA|θ}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|ʃ}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|tʰ}}
! {{IPA|*kʷʼ}} !!
| {{IPA|kʷʼ}} || {{IPA|kʷʼ}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|kʼ}}
|-
! {{IPA|*tsʰ}}
| {{IPA|s}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|s}}
! {{IPA|*kʼ}} !!
| {{IPA|kʼ}} || {{IPA|kʼ}} || {{IPA|kʼ}}
|-
! {{IPA|*s}}
| {{IPA|ɬ}}
| {{IPA|c}} <ref>This consonant is transcribed as a palatalized [tʸ] in Hale (1967) and palatalized [kʸ] in Hale (1962).</ref> || {{IPA|s}}
! {{IPA|*kʰ}} !!
| {{IPA|x}} || {{IPA|x}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|h}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|kʰ}}
|-
! {{IPA|*tʼ}}
| {{IPA|tʼ}} || {{IPA|tʼ}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|tʼ}}
| rowspan="2" | {{IPA|tʼ}}
! {{IPA|*kʷʰ}} !!
| {{IPA|xʷ}} || {{IPA|xʷ}}
|-
! {{IPA|*tsʼ}}
| {{IPA|tʃʼ}} <ref name="apicalfricated">Taos (and also Picuris) {{IPA|/tʃ, tʃʼ/}} varies between post-alveolar {{IPA|[tʃ, tʃʼ]}} and alveolar {{IPA|[ts, tsʼ]}}.</ref> || {{IPA|tsʼ}}
| colspan="6" style="background-color: lightGrey;" |
|}

As can be seen in the above table, a number of [[Phonemic differentiation#Phonemic mergers|phonological mergers]] have occurred in the different languages.<!--Taos, Tewa, and Jemez have merged voiced stops ''*b'', ''*d'' and nasals ''*m'', ''*n'' while Kiowa maintains the distinction. The merger of apical ''*d'' and ''*n'' is conditioned in that the merger only occurs before nasalized vowels — before non-nasalized vowels the contrast is preserved although in Taos there is a [[Sound change|phonetic change]] to a lateral. Kiowa has merged all apical affricates ''*ts'', ''*tsʰ'', ''*ts’'', ''*dz'' with apical stops ''*t'', ''*tʰ'', ''*t’'', ''*d''; Jemez also has this merger but only with the aspirated and glottalized members. Aspirated velars *''kʰ'', ''*kʷʰ'' have become fricatives in the Tanoan languages. Kiowa has merged all plain ''*k'', ''*kʰ'', ''*k’'', ''*ɡ'' and labialized *''kʷ'', ''*kʷʰ'', ''*kʷ”'', ''*ɡʷ'' velars although the earlier labialization can be inferred by the effect of the following vowel. Like Kiowa, Jemez also can labial/non-labial velar merger in the aspirated series.
-->
[[Cognate]] sets supporting the above are listed below:

:{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"
|+ Cognate sets demonstrating initial consonant correspondences<ref>The data here is from Hale (1967), which in turn is gathered from G. Trager's publications (for Taos), Harrington's publications (for Kiowa), Dozier in personal communication to Hale (for Tewa), and Hale's own fieldwork on Jemez.</ref>
! !! &nbsp;Tiwa&nbsp; !! &nbsp;Tewa&nbsp; !! &nbsp;Towa&nbsp; !! &nbsp;Kiowa&nbsp; !! meaning(s)
|-
! *b
| {{IPA|mɑ̃}} || {{IPA|mãʔ}} || {{IPA|mĩ́ː}} || {{IPA|bɔ}}
| style="text-align: left;" | "to bring"
|-
! *m
| {{IPA|mæ̃̀n-}} || {{IPA|mãn}} || {{IPA|mãté}} || {{IPA|mɔ̃ː-dɔ}}
| style="text-align: left;" |  "hand"
|-
! *d&nbsp;(+&nbsp;V)
| {{IPA|līlū-}} || {{IPA|diː}} || {{IPA|délʔɨː}} || –
| style="text-align: left;" | "fowl"
|-
! *d&nbsp;(+&nbsp;Ṽ)
| {{IPA|ˈnæ̃̄m-}} || {{IPA|nãn}} || {{IPA|nṍː}} || {{IPA|dɔ̃-m}}
| style="text-align: left;" | "sand" (in Taos), "ground" (in Tewa, Kiowa), "space" (in Jemez)
|-
! *n
| {{IPA|næ̃̄}} || {{IPA|nãː}} || {{IPA|nĩ́ː}} || {{IPA|nɔ̃ː}}
| style="text-align: left;" | first person singular
|-
! *ts
| {{IPA|ˈtʃī}} || {{IPA|tsíː}} || {{IPA|sé}} || {{IPA|ta}}
| style="text-align: left;" | "eye"
|-
! *t
| {{IPA|tũ̀}} || {{IPA|tṹ}} || {{IPA|tɨ̃́}} || {{IPA|tõ-}}
| style="text-align: left;" | "to say"
|-
! *tsʰ
| {{IPA|sũ̀}} || {{IPA|sũwẽ}} || {{IPA|sɨ̃́}} || {{IPA|tʰõ-m}}
| style="text-align: left;" | "to drink"
|-
! *tʰ
| {{IPA|ˈtʰɤ̄}} || {{IPA|θáː}} || {{IPA|ʃó}} || {{IPA|tʰa-}}
| style="text-align: left;" | "to break" (in Taos, Tewa, Jemez), "to sever several" (in Kiowa)
|-
! *ts’
| {{IPA|ˈtʃʼɑ̄-}} || – || – || {{IPA|tʼɔ-l}}
| style="text-align: left;" | "liver"
|-
! *t’
| {{IPA|tʼɑ́-}} || {{IPA|tʼon}} || {{IPA|tʼaː}} || {{IPA|tʼɔː}}
| style="text-align: left;" | "antelope"
|-
! *dz
| {{IPA|jɑ̄-}} || – || {{IPA|zǽː}} || {{IPA|dɔ}}
| style="text-align: left;" | "song" (in Taos, Jemez), "to sing" (in Kiowa)
|}

==Notes==

{{Reflist}}

== Bibliography ==
{{sister project |project=wiktionary |text=[[Wiktionary]] has a list of reconstructed forms at '''''[[Wiktionary:Appendix:Proto-Kiowa-Tanoan reconstructions|Appendix:Proto-Kiowa-Tanoan reconstructions]]'''''}}
* Campbell, Lyle. (1997). ''American Indian languages: The historical linguistics of Native America''. New York: Oxford University Press. {{ISBN|0-19-509427-1}}.
* Cordell, Linda A. (1979). Prehistory: Eastern Anasazi. In A. Ortiz (Ed.), ''Handbook of North American Indians: Southwest'' (Vol. 9, pp.&nbsp;131–151). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
* Davis, Irvine. (1959). Linguistic cues to northern Rio Grande prehistory. ''El Palacio'', ''66'' (3), 73–84.
* Davis, Irvine. (1979). The Kiowa–Tanoan, Keresan, and Zuni languages. In L. Campbell & M. Mithun (Eds.), ''The languages of native America: Historical and comparative assessment'' (pp.&nbsp;390–443). Austin: University of North Texas.
* Dozier, Edward P. (1954). The Hopi-Tewa of Arizona. ''University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology'', ''44'' (3), 259–376.
* Eggan, Fred. (1979). Pueblos: Introduction. In A. Ortiz (Ed.), ''Handbook of North American Indians: Southwest'' (Vol. 9, pp.&nbsp;224–235). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
* Ellis, Florence Hawley. (1967). Where did the Pueblo people come from? ''El Palacio'', ''74'' (3), 35–43.
* Ford, Richard I.; Schroeder, Albert H.; & Peckham, Stewart L. (1972). Three perspectives on Puebloan prehistory. In A. Ortiz (Ed.), ''New perspectives on the Pueblos'' (pp.&nbsp;19–39). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
* Foster, Michael K. (1999). Language and the culture history of North America. In I. Goddard (Ed.), ''Handbook of North American Indians: Languages'' (Vol. 17, pp.&nbsp;64–110). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
* Hale, Kenneth L. (1962). Jemez and Kiowa correspondences in reference to Kiowa–Tanoan. ''International Journal of American Linguistics'', ''28'' (1), 1–5.
* Hale, Kenneth L. (1967). Toward a reconstruction of Kiowa–Tanoan phonology. ''International Journal of American Linguistics'', ''33'' (2), 112–120.
* Hale, Kenneth L. (1979). Historical linguistics and archeology. In A. Ortiz (Ed.), ''Handbook of North American Indians: Southwest'' (Vol. 9, pp.&nbsp;170–177). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
* Harrington, J. P. (1910). On phonetic and lexic resemblances in Kiowan and Tanoan. ''American Anthropologist'', ''12'' (1), 119–123.
* Harrington, J. P. (1928). ''Vocabulary of the Kiowa language''. Bureau of American Ethnology bulletin (No. 84). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off.
* Hill, Jane H. (2002). Toward a linguistic prehistory of the Southwest: "Azteco-Tanoan" and the arrival of maize cultivation. ''Journal of Anthropological Research'', ''58'' (4), 457–476.
* Hill, Jane H. (2008). Northern Uto-Aztecan and Kiowa–Tanoan: Evidence of contact between the proto-Languages? ''International Journal of American Linguistics'', ''74'' (2), 155–188.
* Kinkade, M. Dale; & Powell, J. V. (1976). Language and prehistory of North America. ''World Archaeology'', ''8'' (1), 83-100.
* Leap, William L. (1971). Who were the Piro? ''Anthropological Linguistics'', ''13'' (7), 321–330.
* Miller, Wick R. (1959). A note on Kiowa linguistic affiliations.  ''American Anthropologist'', ''61'' (1), 102–105.
* Mithun, Marianne. (1999). ''The languages of Native North America''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|0-521-23228-7}} (hbk); {{ISBN|0-521-29875-X}}.
* Mooney, James. (1898). Calendar history of the Kiowa Indians. In ''17th annual report of the Bureau of American Ethnology for 1895-1896'' (Part 1, pp.&nbsp;129–445). Washington, D.C.
* Mooney, James. (1907). Kiowa. In F. W. Hodge (Ed.), ''Handbook of American Indians'' (Part 1, pp.&nbsp;669–701). Bureau of American Ethnology bulletin (No. 30). Washington, D.C.
* Newman, Stanley S. (1954). American Indian linguistics in the Southwest. ''American Anthropologist'', ''56'' (4), 626–634.
* Nichols, Lynn. (1994). Subordination and ablaut in Kiowa–Tanoan. ''Southwest Journal of Linguistics'', ''13'', 85–99.
* Nichols, Lynn. (1996). Toward a reconstruction of Kiowa–Tanoan ablaut. In ''Proceedings of the 22nd annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society''.
* Plog, Fred. (1979). Prehistory: Western Anasazi. In A. Ortiz (Ed.), ''Handbook of North American Indians: Southwest'' (Vol. 9, pp.&nbsp;108–130). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
* Reed, Erik K. (1949). Sources of upper Rio Grande Pueblo culture and population. ''El Palacio'', ''56'' (6), 163–184.
* Snow, Dean R. (1976). ''The archaeology of North America''. New York: The Viking Press.
* Trager, George L. (1942). The historical phonology of the Tiwa languages. ''Studies in Linguistics'', ''1'' (5), 1-10.
* Trager, George L. (1951). Linguistic history and ethnologic history in the Southwest. ''Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences'', ''41'', 341–343.
* Trager, George L. (1967). The Tanoan settlement of the Rio Grande area: A possible chronology. In D. H. Hymes & W. E. Bittle (Eds.), ''Studies in southwestern ethnolinguistics: Meaning and history in the languages of the American Southwest'' (pp.&nbsp;335–350). The Hague: Mouton.
* Trager, George L. (1969). Taos and Picuris: How long separated. ''International Journal of American Linguistics'', ''35'' (2), 180–182.
* Trager, George L.; & Trager, Edith Crowell. (1959). Kiowa and Tanoan.  ''American Anthropologist'', ''61'' (6), 1078–1083.
* Wendorf, Fred. (1954). A reconstruction of northern Rio Grande prehistory. ''American Anthropologist'', ''56'' (2), 200–227.
* Wendorf, Fred; & Reed, Erik K. (1955). An alternative reconstruction of northern Rio Grande prehistory. ''El Palacio'', ''62'' (5/6), 131–173.

{{Tanoan languages}}
{{Language families}}
{{North American languages}}

[[Category:Tanoan languages| ]]
[[Category:Language families]]
[[Category:Pueblo linguistic area]]