1926 Alberta general election

Template:Short description Template:Use mdy dates Template:Infobox election The 1926 Alberta general election was held on June 28, 1926, to elect members of the Legislative Assembly of Alberta. The United Farmers of Alberta government that had first been elected in 1921 was re-elected, taking a majority of the seats in the Alberta Legislature. Herbert Greenfield had resigned as United Farmers leader and premier, and John E. Brownlee led the UFA to this second election victory, increasing the UFA's number of seats.

The writs of election were issued on May 10, 1926, allowing an election period of 40 days.

Alberta's first general election where Single transferable voting (STV) was used in 1926. STV was utilized in the three largest cities and Instant-runoff voting was used everywhere else.<ref>A Report on Alberta Elections 1905-1982</ref>

Calgary, Edmonton and Medicine Hat continued to be multi member districts. Edmonton elected five members; Calgary elected five members; Medicine Hat elected two. Previously they had elected members by Plurality block voting. Now they elected members using STV-PR, which at the time was called the Hare Proportional representation system.<ref>A Report on Alberta Elections 1905-1982</ref> The seats in each city were filled by candidates who received quota or plurality of the votes whether through first-choice votes or a combination of first-choice votes and votes transferred from less-popular candidates and from successful candidates elected with surplus votes. Each voter cast just one vote so no one group could take all the seats in a city.

Outside the large cities, districts were single member districts and MLAs were elected under the Alternative Voting system. Rural voters, like their city counterparts, cast preferential ballots and had the ability to rank the candidates. The seat was filled by the candidate who received a majority of the votes whether through first-choice votes or a combination of first-choice votes and votes transferred from less-popular candidates.<ref>A Report on Alberta Elections 1905-1982, p. 193-200</ref> This was the first election in Canada (and in North America) where all the members were elected through something other than X voting.

This dual system of voting would last until 1956. In 1926, Medicine Hat changed to a single-member constituency.

Under STV in Edmonton, the UFA captured one seat in Edmonton where it had taken no seats in 1921 under the Liberal government's Block Voting system. The Labour party also for the first time elected an MLA in Edmonton. As well, Edmonton voters elected a Liberal and two Conservatives. This mixed crop of representatives was much better balanced than the single-party sweeps that Edmonton had previously elected through other electoral systems.

The UFA also took a great share of the rural seats, taking 42 of the province's 49 rural seats. It took four rural seats that had been captured by Liberal candidates in 1921 (Beaver River, Leduc, Sedgewick and Whitford), and one that had been won by an Independent in 1921 (Claresholm). The UFA also won the district of Empress, formerly known as Redcliffe, which had been won by the UFA in 1921. No UFA candidate ran for re-election to its seat in Medicine Hat. It gained a seat in the newly created next-door Cypress district. It also lost its St. Albert seat.

The UFA derived no benefit from Alternative Voting - it would have won all but one of the seats it won under Alternative Voting if the contest had been conducted using First-past-the-post voting. And it lost one seat that it would have won if the contest had been held using First-past-the-post voting, (in Bow Valley).

Conservatives, being a less popular party, had been badly treated under FPTP and Block Voting in 1921 but now did better. It won two seats each in Edmonton and Calgary, where Block Voting had been replaced by STV.

At the time of the election call, six seats were sitting vacant. They had been vacated by MLAs who had run in the 1925 federal election. MLA C.W. Cross was elected in the federal election. William McCartney Davidson, Calgary Independent MLA, was another one of those who had left.<ref>Strathmore Standard, Feb. 24, 1926, p. 1</ref>

The UFA vote share (as measured by First Preference votes) went up 10 percent in this election compared to 1921. This shows effect of the change in voting system - the UFA actually received 15,000 fewer votes in 1926 than in 1921, but the overall number of votes cast had decreased by 118,000. Five thousand more voters voted in this election compared to 1921. But without each city voter being able to cast multiple votes the number of votes cast was much fewer. For example, the Liberals received 54,000 fewer votes. The change in percentage of UFA support resulted from urban voters not being allowed to cast multiple voters as they had done in 1921. That had artificially raised the Liberal vote count and percentage and had lowered the UFA percentage recorded for the 1921 election.

In 1926, the UFA vote count outside the cities was 69,000, having gone down from the 81,000 the party's candidates had received outside the cities in 1921. The UFA's received about half of the first-preference votes cast outside the cities, and was the secondary choice of many voters who initially had voted for another party. In each of the 42 districts where the UFA candidate won, he or she received either a majority of first Preference votes or a majority that was composed of both First Preference votes and transferred votes.<ref>A Report on Alberta Elections, 1905-1982 p. 12</ref>

Under STV, Edmonton elected a mixed bag of representatives. UFA, Liberal, Conservative, and Labour MLAs were all elected, which compared well with the total sweep that Liberals made in 1921 under Block Voting.

In Calgary, Conservative supporters found representation under STV where they had been shut out under Block Voting in 1921.

Under Alternative Voting outside the cities, if no candidate took a majority of votes in the first count, votes were transferred until a candidate acceptable to a majority of the voters was determined. In Bow Valley the UFA candidate leading in the first count did not have as much support from Conservative supporters as the Liberal candidate so when the Conservative votes were transferred, a Liberal took the seat.

In four districts only two candidates ran so vote transfers were not needed. But elsewhere three-way contests were the rule. three-cornered contests would be a feature of most elections from here on in, as Canada had passed the point when only two parties dominated politics. Labour and farmer parties were here to stay to fight it out against the two old-line parties.

In 15 of the province's 49 rural districts, three or more candidates ran and vote-splitting meant no one candidate took a majority of the votes on the first count. A UFA candidate was in the top spot in most of these contests. Liberal and Conservative party supporters were split on whether to support the other old-line party or the UFA, if their candidate was eliminated and their ballots able to be transferred to another. In many cases many Conservative and Liberal back-up preferences were marked for the UFA candidate, and in eight of those 15 districts the UFA candidate who had been leading in the first count won the seat, in three the Liberal leading was elected in the end, and in two the Labour candidate was leading and elected in the end.

The only turn-overs where the candidate leading in the first count was not elected happened in Bow Valley and Pincher Creek. In Pincher Creek, back-up preferences on votes at first placed on the Conservative candidate favoured the UFA candidate, who took the seat over the previously leading Liberal candidate. In Bow Valley, vote transfers from the Conservative candidate went mostly to the Liberal, who passed the UFA candidate in popularity. Overall party-wise the two turn-overs cancelled each other but two different individuals were elected due to the Alternative Voting system than would have been elected under FPTP.

The UFA's seat majority was due to its victories in the rural areas. Its moral right to power rested on the fact that to be elected in a rural district a candidate had to have support from a majority of a district's voters. The UFA was elected through majority support in 42 of the province's 52 districts, and its candidate in Edmonton was the most popular of all the candidates who ran there as well.<ref>A Report on Alberta Elections, 1905-1982 p. 12</ref>

Redistribution of districts

Upon the death of Joseph State, Clearwater was abolished in 1924, with parts of it distributed to Pembina, Lac Ste. Anne, Edson and Peace River.<ref>Template:Cite canlaw</ref>

An Act passed in 1926, after the election, made changes to the following ridings:<ref>Template:Cite canlaw</ref>

• Cypress was carved out from Medicine Hat, and the latter was reduced to returning one MLA.
• Redcliff was renamed as Empress.

The net effect was to reduce the size of the Assembly from 61 to 60 MLAs.

Results

Elections to the 6th Alberta Legislative Assembly (1926)

Party		Leader	Candidates	First-preference votes<ref group=a>Vote comparisons not given with 1921, as previous voting system had skewed results from multiple votes recorded in Calgary, Edmonton and Medicine Hat.</ref>			Seats
				Votes	±	% Template:Abbr	1921	1926	±	John E. Brownlee	46	71,967	39.68	10.76Template:Increase	38	Template:Composition bar	5Template:Increase	Joseph Tweed Shaw	54	47,450	26.17	7.90Template:Decrease	15	Template:Composition bar	8Template:Decrease	Fred J. White	12	14,123	7.79	3.25Template:Decrease	4	Template:Composition bar	1Template:Increase	Alexander McGillivray	56	40,091	22.10	11.12Template:Increase	–	Template:Composition bar	4Template:Increase		1	2,467	1.37	1.69Template:Decrease	–	Template:Composition bar	1Template:Increase		3	1,254	0.70	8.96Template:Decrease	4	Template:Composition bar	4Template:Decrease		5	2,728	1.51	1.02Template:Increase		5	999	0.55	New		1	252	0.13	New
Total			183	175,137	100.00
Rejected ballots				8,855
Turnout				183,992	67.2%
Registered voters				273,750

MLAs elected

Synopsis of results

Results by ridingTemplate:Snd1926 Alberta general election (all except Calgary and Edmonton)<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Riding	First-preference votes								Turnout <ref group=a>including spoilt ballots</ref>	Final counts					Winning party
Name	UFA	Template:Abbr	Template:Abbr	Template:Abbr	Template:Abbr	Template:Abbr	Template:Abbr	Total		UFA	Template:Abbr	Template:Abbr	Template:Abbr	Template:Abbr	1921		1926
Acadia	2,056	402	627	–	–	–	–	3,085	76.5%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Alexandra	1,653	253	421	–	–	–	–	2,327	66.0%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Athabasca	295	373	245	–	221	–	–	1,134	68.3%	363	451	–	–	–		Lib		Lib
Beaver River	1,168	989	–	–	–	–	–	2,157	64.0%	Elected on 1st count						Lib		UFA
Bow Valley	869	847	641	–	–	–	–	2,357	67.9%	1,047	1,048	–	–	–		Lib		Lib
Camrose	2,872	567	300	–	–	–	252	3,991	58.3%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Cardston	1,328	598	480	–	–	–	–	2,406	77.4%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Claresholm	939	–	422	–	–	–	–	1,361	75.1%	Elected on 1st count						Ind		UFA
Cochrane	883	597	385	–	–	–	–	1,865	75.6%	1,013	673	–	–	–		UFA		UFA
Coronation	2,387	945	498	–	–	–	–	3,830	79.3%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Cypress	1,220	741	175	–	–	–	–	2,136	73.7%	Elected on 1st count					New			UFA
Didsbury	2,292	895	819	–	–	–	–	4,006	61.3%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Edson	–	702	963	1,116	–	–	–	2,781	58.5%	–	–	1,139	1,219	–		Lib		Lab
Empress	922	464	189	–	–	–	–	1,575	77.7%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Gleichen	1,584	478	722	–	–	–	–	2,784	66.6%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Grouard	–	1,224	407	–	–	–	–	1,631	67.5%	Elected on 1st count						Lib		Lib
Hand Hills	2,665	778	590	–	–	–	–	4,033	69.0%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
High River	1,137	271	541	–	–	–	–	1,949	71.6%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Innisfail	1,187	844	534	–	–	–	–	2,565	71.8%	1,327	1,063	–	–	–		UFA		UFA
Lac Ste. Anne	1,757	239	492	–	–	–	–	2,488	67.0%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Lacombe	1,891	1,162	476	–	–	–	–	3,529	74.6%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Leduc	1,961	1,561	823	–	–	–	–	4,345	72.2%	2,334	1,669	–	–	–		Lib		UFA
Lethbridge	–	1,225	1,459	1,584	–	–	–	4,268	71.5%	–	–	1,713	1,962	–		Ind		Lab
Little Bow	1,367	556	475	–	–	–	–	2,398	77.9%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Macleod	656	567	125	–	–	–	–	1,348	79.4%	709	600	–	–	–		UFA		UFA
Medicine Hat	–	1,574	1,279	718	–	–	–	3,571	72.3%	–	1,701	1,487	–	–				Lib + C
Nanton	745	204	341	–	–	–	–	1,290	75.1%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Okotoks	920	–	850	–	–	–	–	1,770	80.1%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Olds	1,613	708	369	–	–	–	–	2,690	70.3%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Peace River	2,548	1,131	965	–	–	–	–	4,644	70.9%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Pembina	1,930	886	427	–	–	–	–	3,243	75.1%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Pincher Creek	542	592	471	–	–	–	–	1,605	87.9%	720	688	–	–	–		UFA		UFA
Ponoka	1,357	453	347	–	–	–	–	2,157	67.3%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Red Deer	1,450	621	1,329	–	–	–	–	3,400	70.5%	1,641	–	1,524	–	–		UFA		UFA
Ribstone	1,524	622	284	–	–	–	–	2,430	70.2%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Rocky Mountain	–	786	801	1,765	–	–	–	3,352	64.7%	Elected on 1st count						Lab		Lab
St. Albert	628	1,058	85	–	683	–	–	2,454	84.4%	–	1,174	–	–	883		UFA		Lib
St. Paul	1,453	603	–	–	–	105	–	2,161	72.0%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Sedgewick	2,264	694	468	–	–	–	–	3,426	70.6%	Elected on 1st count						Lib		UFA
Stettler	2,122	837	921	–	–	–	–	3,880	72.1%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Stony Plain	759	368	414	–	323	–	–	1,864	69.0%	938	–	485	–	–		UFA		UFA
Sturgeon	2,605	1,154	348	–	–	–	–	4,107	70.0%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Taber	1,929	709	551	–	–	–	–	3,189	65.4%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Vegreville	1,986	1,395	687	–	–	337	–	4,405	71.1%	2,217	1,702	–	–	–		UFA		UFA
Vermilion	1,981	492	592	–	–	–	–	3,065	67.5%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Victoria	1,404	1,185	90	–	322	96	–	3,097	70.0%	1,476	1,243	–	–	–		UFA		UFA
Wainwright	1,609	–	1,017	–	–	–	–	2,626	71.0%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Warner	741	225	190	–	–	–	–	1,156	76.4%	Elected on 1st count						UFA		UFA
Wetaskiwin	1,274	1,198	288	–	–	–	–	2,760	80.1%	1,418	1,266	–	–	–		UFA		UFA
Whitford	1,449	371	274	–	–	461<ref group=a>Andrew Shandro had won as the Liberal candidate in 1921, but the election was subsequently voided by the court. He would lose the subsequent 1922 byelection to the UFA candidate Mike Chornohus. In 1926, he received 373 votes.</ref>	–	2,555	63.7%	Elected on 1st count						Lib		UFA

Template:Color box = Open seat

Template:Color box = turnout is above provincial average

Template:Color box = Candidate was in previous Legislature

Template:Color box = Incumbent had switched allegiance

Template:Color box = Previously incumbent in another riding

Template:Color box = Not incumbent; was previously elected to the Legislature

Template:Color box = Incumbency arose from by-election gain

Template:Color box = previously an MP in the House of Commons of Canada

Template:Color box = Multiple candidates

Multi-member districts

District	Seats won (L to R in order declared)
Calgary	width=20 Template:Canadian party colour |	width=20 Template:Canadian party colour |	width=20 Template:Canadian party colour |	width=20 Template:Canadian party colour | DLP	width=20 Template:Canadian party colour | Ind
Edmonton	Template:Canadian party colour |	Template:Canadian party colour |	Template:Canadian party colour |	Template:Canadian party colour |	Template:Canadian party colour |

width=20 Template:Canadian party colour |	UFA
Template:Canadian party colour |	Liberal
Template:Canadian party colour |	Conservative
Template:Canadian party colour |	Labour (Dominion Labour Party)

Template:Color box = Candidate was in previous Legislature

Template:Color box = First-time MLA

Template:Color box = Previously incumbent in another district.

Also Medicine Hat elected two MLAs - Liberal Pingle (incumbent) and Conservative Hendricks

STV vote analysis

Calgary

Five to be elected, Quota 3290 (Droop quota) Template:STV Election box begin2 Template:STV Election box candidate2 Canada Template:STV Election box candidate2 Canada Template:STV Election box candidate2 Canada Template:STV Election box candidate2 Canada Template:STV Election box candidate2 Canada Template:STV Election box candidate2 Canada Template:STV Election box candidate2 Canada Template:STV Election box candidate2 Canada Template:STV Election box candidate2 Canada Template:STV Election box candidate2 Canada Template:STV Election box candidate2 Canada

Template:Election box ranked choice begin

Initial terminal transfer rates for votes (1926)

Transferred from	Non-transferrable	% transferred to					Total
		Conservative	Liberal	Ind-Lab	Dom-Lab	Ind
Template:Canadian party colour (McGillivray)	–	2,268	271	39	54	6	2,638
	–	85.97%	10.27%	1.48%	2.05%	0.23%	100.00%
Template:Canadian party colour (Ross)	117	22	70	69	1,176	–	1,454
	8.05%	1.51%	4.81%	4.75%	80.88%	–	100.00%

Edmonton

1 UFA, 1 Liberal, 2 Conservatives and 1 Labour MLA were elected. Lymburn, Weaver, Gibbs, Prevey and Duggan were elected.

18,154 valid votes Five to be elected Quota: 3026

First Count tallies

Lymburn (UFA) 3046 declared elected in 1st Count

Weaver (Conservative) 2202 declared elected in 11th Count

Prevey (Liberal) 1517 declared elected after 16th Count

Clarke (Ind-Liberal) 1179

Bowen (Liberal) 1147

Barnes (Independent) 1060

Farmilo (Labour) 973

Follinsbee (Conservative) 881

Gibbs (Labour) 879 declared elected in 15th Count

Henry (Liberal) 858

Duggan (Conservative) 857 declared elected after 16th Count

Crawford (Conservative) 782

Findlay (Labour) 628

Lakeman (Labour) 605

Rea (Liberal) 561

Roper (Labour) 478

Robertson (Conservative) 361

Leedy (Independent) 140

The vote count went like this:

1st Count Lymburn achieved quota and was declared elected. His surplus was so small it was not immediately transferred.

Leedy, Roper, Rea, Lakeman, Crawford, Findlay. Henry, Follinsbee, Barnes were eliminated, in turn. Transfer of Barnes' votes put Weaver over quota, and he was declared elected on the 11th Count. Lakeman's transfers went more to Gibbs than to Farmilo and Gibbs overtook Farmilo. That is why later Farmilo was eliminated and not Gibbs, even though Gibbs had started out with fewer votes than Farmilo.

Lymburn's surplus was transferred at this point, then Weaver's was also.

Clarke and Farmilo were eliminated. Farmilo's transfers put Gibbs over quota, and he was declared elected. This left just Bowen, Prevey and Duggan still standing, with two open seats remaining. Of the three, Prevey and Duggan were more popular than Bowen.

Gibbs' surplus was transferred. It did not change the relative standing of the three remaining candidates.

Bowen was declared defeated. Prevey and Duggan were declared elected despite not having quota.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Lymburn, Weaver, Gibbs, Prevey and Duggan were elected in the end.

Reports on the Edmonton count concentrate on the activity from the 11th count onwards.<ref name="EdmJrnl">Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

Initial terminal transfer rates for votes (1926)

Transferred from	Non-transferrable	% transferred to			Total
		Conservative	Liberal	Labour
Template:Canadian party colour (Clarke)	392	185	449	570	1,596
	24.56%	11.59%	28.13%	35.71%	100.00%
Template:Canadian party colour (Farmilo)	461	74	166	1,190	1,891
	24.38%	3.91%	8.78%	62.93%	100.00%

See also

• List of Alberta political parties

Further reading

• Template:Cite book