1935 Quebec general election
Template:Short description Template:More citations needed Template:Use mdy dates Template:Infobox election
The 1935 Quebec general election was held on November 25, 1935, to elect members of the Legislative Assembly of the province of Quebec, Canada. The incumbent Quebec Liberal Party led by Louis-Alexandre Taschereau was re-elected, defeating the Action libérale nationale, led by Paul Gouin, and the Quebec Conservative Party, led by Maurice Duplessis.
It was the fourth and final general election victory in a row for Taschereau, who had held office since 1920. He resigned less than seven months later due to a scandal.
The Action libérale nationale (ALN) was a newly formed party led by the son of former Liberal premier Lomer Gouin. It was established by former Liberals who had become dissatisfied with the party. The ALN and Conservatives formed an alliance, the Union Nationale, to contest this election. They merged after the election to become a single party, which soon became a dominant political force.
Campaign
Nominations
There were 208 candidates nominated,<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> of which five subsequently withdrew:<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
- Wilfrid Bullock (Ind-Liberal, Shefford)
- Wilfrid Labelle (ALN, Iberville), thus allowing Lucien Lamoureux (Liberal) to be reelected by acclamation
- Roy Sasseville and René Mercier (Ind-Liberals, Gaspé-Nord)
- Arthur Arcand (Ind-Liberal, Montréal–Sainte-Marie), in favour of Gaspard Fauteux (Liberal)
All three candidates returned by acclamation were incumbents:
- Lucien Lamoureux (Lib, Iberville)
- Peter Bercovitch (Lib, Montréal–Saint-Louis)
- Avila Turcotte (Lib, Richelieu)
Distribution of candidates
| Candidates | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Lib | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Ind-G | ALN | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Con | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Ind-Lib | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Ind-Con | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Lib-Opp | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Ind-Opp | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Lab | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Lib-Lab | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acclaimed | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
| 2 | 64 | 40 | 23 | 1 | 128 | ||||||
| 3 | 19 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 57 | ||
| 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 16 | |||
| Total | 90 | 3 | 54 | 32 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 204 |
Controversy in Terrebonne
In Terrebonne, the election of Athanase David was contested on the ground that the ballot papers were not printed in the form prescribed under the Election Act. At the subsequent hearing, the judge ruled that all cast ballots were declared void. Immediately afterwards, the returning officer announced that, as this resulted in a 0–0 tie, he cast his deciding vote in favour of David.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
| Candidate | Initial count<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> |
As determined by Returning Officer<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> |
Athanase David | 4,893 | 1 | Template:Ill | 4,170 | – | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Majority | 720 | 1 | ||||||||
The returning officer's action was considered to have been without precedent anywhere in the world in countries with parliamentary-style legislatures.<ref name="Gazette19351217">Template:Cite news</ref> The Conservatives lodged an appeal,<ref name="Gazette19351217"/> but the result was upheld by the Quebec Court of Appeal in April 1936.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> David would become the only member of the Assembly in Quebec history to be elected on only one cast vote.<ref>Template:Cite news </ref> Template:Clear
Results
Template:Election table<ref name="EQdata">Template:Cite web</ref> |- ! colspan=2 rowspan=2 | Political party ! rowspan=2 | Party leader ! colspan=4 | MLAs ! colspan=4 | Votes |- ! Candidates !1931 !1935 !± !# ! ± !% ! ± (pp) |- |rowspan="3" Template:Canadian party colour| |style="text-align:left;" colspan="10"|Government candidates |- |style="text-align:left;" |Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"|Louis-Alexandre Taschereau |90 |79 |47 |5Template:Increase |249,586 |19,146Template:Decrease |46.53 |8.35Template:Decrease |- |style="text-align:left;" |Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"|– |3 |– |– |– |615 |2,172Template:Decrease |0.11 |0.46Template:Decrease |- |rowspan="3" Template:Canadian party colour| |style="text-align:left;" colspan="10"|Union Nationale alliance |- |style="text-align:left;" |Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"|Paul Gouin |53 |– |26 |26Template:Increase |162,205 |Template:N/a |30.24 |Template:N/a |- |style="text-align:left;" |Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"|Maurice Duplessis |33 |11 |16 |5Template:Increase |97,469 |115,754Template:Decrease |18.17 |25.37Template:Decrease |- |rowspan="3" Template:Canadian party colour| |style="text-align:left;" colspan="10"|Opposition candidates |- |style="text-align:left;" |Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"|– |1 |– |– |– |1,532 |Template:N/a |0.29 |Template:N/a |- |style="text-align:left;" |Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"|– |1 |– |– |– |94 |12Template:Decrease |0.02 |– |- |rowspan="5" Template:Canadian party colour| |style="text-align:left;" colspan="10"|Other candidates |- |style="text-align:left;" |Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"|– |19 |– |1 |1Template:Increase |21,587 |20,522Template:Increase |4.02 |3.80Template:Increase |- |style="text-align:left;" |Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"|– |2 |– |– |– |2,238 |1,757Template:Increase |0.42 |0.32Template:Increase |- |style="text-align:left;" |Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"|– |1 |– |– |– |998 |Template:N/a |0.19 |Template:N/a |- |style="text-align:left;" |Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"|– |1 |– |– |– |37 |547Template:Decrease |– |0.12Template:Decrease |- ! colspan="3" style="text-align:left;" | Total | 204 ! " colspan="3"| 90 ! " colspan="2"| 536,361 ! " colspan="2"| 100% |- | colspan="7" style="text-align:left;" | Rejected ballots | 15,232 | 11,042Template:Increase | colspan="2"| |- | colspan="7" style="text-align:left;" | Voter turnout | 551,593 | 57,708Template:Increase | 76.16 | 0.85Template:Decrease |- | colspan="7" style="text-align:left;" | Registered electors (contested ridings only) | 724,260 | 82,936Template:Increase | colspan="2"| |- | colspan="5" style="text-align:left;" | Candidates returned by acclamation | 3 | 3Template:Increase | colspan="4"| |}
Template:Bar boxTemplate:Bar box
Synopsis of results
| Riding | Winning party | Turnout <ref group=a>including spoilt ballots</ref> |
Votes<ref group=a>Affiliations without candidates gaining 1st or 2nd place results provincewide, or otherwise not receiving more than 1% of the total vote, are grouped under "I-Oth" or "Other"</ref> | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | 1931 | Party | Votes | Share | Margin # |
Margin % |
Lib | Template:Abbr | Con | Template:Abbr | Template:Abbr | Template:Abbr | Template:Abbr | Total | |||
| Abitibi | Lib | Lib | 6,088 | 55.78% | 1,261 | 11.55% | 80.85% | 6,088 | – | 4,827 | – | – | – | – | 10,915 | ||
| Argenteuil | Lib | Lib | 2,412 | 51.31% | 123 | 2.62% | 77.61% | 2,412 | 2,289 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,701 | ||
| Arthabaska | Lib | Lib | 4,143 | 69.36% | 2,313 | 38.72% | 84.12% | 4,143 | – | 1,830 | – | – | – | – | 5,973 | ||
| Bagot | Lib | Lib | 2,386 | 57.98% | 657 | 15.97% | 89.06% | 2,386 | 1,729 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,115 | ||
| Beauce | Lib | ALN | 6,862 | 80.41% | 5,190 | 60.82% | 83.45% | 1,672 | 6,862 | – | – | – | – | – | 8,534 | ||
| Beauharnois | Lib | Con | 2,706 | 53.38% | 343 | 6.77% | 82.16% | 2,363 | – | 2,706 | – | – | – | – | 5,069 | ||
| Bellechasse | Lib | Lib | 2,483 | 54.08% | 375 | 8.17% | 83.22% | 2,483 | 2,108 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,591 | ||
| Berthier | Lib | Lib | 2,897 | 58.77% | 865 | 17.55% | 91.58% | 2,897 | 2,032 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,929 | ||
| Bonaventure | Lib | Lib | 4,507 | 62.56% | 1,810 | 25.12% | 81.86% | 4,507 | 2,697 | – | – | – | – | – | 7,204 | ||
| Brome | Lib | Lib | 1,999 | 57.28% | 508 | 14.56% | 82.19% | 1,999 | – | 1,491 | – | – | – | – | 3,490 | ||
| Chambly | Con | Lib | 3,023 | 54.95% | 545 | 9.91% | 71.87% | 3,023 | – | 2,478 | – | – | – | – | 5,501 | ||
| Champlain | Lib | ALN | 3,257 | 56.20% | 719 | 12.41% | 76.09% | 2,538 | 3,257 | – | – | – | – | – | 5,795 | ||
| Charlevoix—Saguenay | Lib | Lib | 5,220 | 65.57% | 2,479 | 31.14% | 76.76% | 5,220 | 2,741 | – | – | – | – | – | 7,961 | ||
| Châteauguay | Lib | Lib | 1,967 | 58.04% | 545 | 16.08% | 86.26% | 1,967 | 1,422 | – | – | – | – | – | 3,389 | ||
| Chicoutimi | Lib | ALN | 7,484 | 72.60% | 4,659 | 45.19% | 76.25% | 2,825 | 7,484 | – | – | – | – | – | 10,309 | ||
| Compton | Lib | Con | 2,803 | 52.27% | 243 | 4.53% | 83.19% | 2,560 | – | 2,803 | – | – | – | – | 5,363 | ||
| Deux-Montagnes | Con | Lib | 1,848 | 50.19% | 14 | 0.38% | 92.53% | 1,848 | – | 1,834 | – | – | – | – | 3,682 | ||
| Dorchester | Lib | ALN | 3,661 | 55.94% | 777 | 11.87% | 84.37% | 2,884 | 3,661 | – | – | – | – | – | 6,545 | ||
| Drummond | Lib | Lib | 3,245 | 47.57% | 20 | 0.29% | 79.71% | 3,245 | – | 3,225 | 351 | – | – | – | 6,821 | ||
| Frontenac | Lib | ALN | 3,310 | 62.19% | 1,298 | 24.39% | 84.57% | 2,012 | 3,310 | – | – | – | – | – | 5,322 | ||
| Gaspé-Nord | Lib | Lib | 1,228 | 44.27% | 96 | 3.46% | 83.41% | 1,228 | 414 | – | 1,132 | – | – | – | 2,774 | ||
| Gaspé-Sud | Lib | Lib | 3,019 | 50.42% | 1,281 | 21.39% | 86.10% | 3,019 | – | 660 | 2,309 | – | – | – | 5,988 | ||
| Gatineau | Lib | Lib | 2,793 | 57.95% | 766 | 15.89% | 63.66% | 2,793 | 2,027 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,820 | ||
| Hull | Con | Lib | 3,053 | 48.93% | 795 | 12.74% | 59.29% | 3,053 | – | 2,258 | 928 | – | – | – | 6,239 | ||
| Huntingdon | Con | Con | 1,750 | 54.79% | 306 | 9.58% | 83.59% | 1,444 | – | 1,750 | – | – | – | – | 3,194 | ||
| Iberville | Lib | Lib | acclaimed (opponent withdrew) | ||||||||||||||
| Îles-de-la-Madeleine | Lib | Lib | 1,358 | 67.29% | 963 | 47.72% | 87.20% | 1,358 | 395 | – | 265 | – | – | – | 2,018 | ||
| Jacques-Cartier | Lib | ALN | 4,909 | 56.84% | 1,182 | 13.69% | 73.16% | 3,727 | 4,909 | – | – | – | – | – | 8,636 | ||
| Joliette | Lib | Lib | 3,484 | 53.32% | 434 | 6.64% | 86.80% | 3,484 | – | 3,050 | – | – | – | – | 6,534 | ||
| Kamouraska | Lib | Lib | 2,918 | 57.27% | 741 | 14.54% | 83.99% | 2,918 | 2,177 | – | – | – | – | – | 5,095 | ||
| L'Assomption | Lib | ALN | 1,969 | 50.80% | 62 | 1.60% | 89.29% | 1,907 | 1,969 | – | – | – | – | – | 3,876 | ||
| L'Islet | Lib | Lib | 2,454 | 59.32% | 771 | 18.64% | 81.33% | 2,454 | 1,683 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,137 | ||
| Labelle | Lib | ALN | 2,604 | 62.93% | 1,070 | 25.86% | 80.81% | 1,534 | 2,604 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,138 | ||
| Lac-Saint-Jean | Lib | Con | 2,255 | 50.59% | 53 | 1.19% | 86.90% | 2,202 | – | 2,255 | – | – | – | – | 4,457 | ||
| Laval | Lib | Con | 10,125 | 53.62% | 2,412 | 12.77% | 69.50% | 7,713 | – | 10,125 | 1,044 | – | – | – | 18,882 | ||
| Laviolette | Lib | ALN | 3,497 | 61.00% | 1,261 | 22.00% | 72.64% | 2,236 | 3,497 | – | – | – | – | – | 5,733 | ||
| Lévis | Lib | ALN | 3,346 | 42.33% | 595 | 7.53% | 86.19% | 1,808 | 3,346 | – | 2,751 | – | – | – | 7,905 | ||
| Lotbinière | Lib | Lib | 4,088 | 80.58% | 3,103 | 61.17% | 77.67% | 4,088 | 985 | – | – | – | – | – | 5,073 | ||
| Maisonneuve | Lib | Con | 9,408 | 56.34% | 2,757 | 16.51% | 65.26% | 6,651 | – | 9,408 | – | – | 639 | – | 16,698 | ||
| Maskinongé | Lib | Lib | 2,319 | 64.20% | 1,026 | 28.41% | 78.04% | 2,319 | 1,293 | – | – | – | – | – | 3,612 | ||
| Matane | Lib | Lib | 2,780 | 57.53% | 728 | 15.07% | 72.12% | 2,780 | 2,052 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,832 | ||
| Matapédia | Lib | Lib | 2,809 | 50.86% | 95 | 1.72% | 86.71% | 2,809 | 2,714 | – | – | – | – | – | 5,523 | ||
| Mégantic | Lib | ALN | 4,480 | 59.06% | 1,375 | 18.13% | 84.61% | 3,105 | 4,480 | – | – | – | – | – | 7,585 | ||
| Missisquoi | Lib | Con | 2,686 | 53.23% | 481 | 9.53% | 83.64% | 2,205 | – | 2,686 | – | – | – | 155 | 5,046 | ||
| Montcalm | Lib | Lib | 1,763 | 52.77% | 185 | 5.54% | 85.17% | 1,763 | – | 1,578 | – | – | – | – | 3,341 | ||
| Montmagny | Lib | ALN | 2,340 | 52.51% | 224 | 5.03% | 83.87% | 2,116 | 2,340 | – | – | – | – | – | 4,456 | ||
| Montmorency | Lib | Lib | 2,196 | 56.26% | 489 | 12.53% | 90.42% | 2,196 | 1,707 | – | – | – | – | – | 3,903 | ||
| Montréal-Dorion | Lib | ALN | 4,979 | 56.17% | 1,094 | 12.34% | 66.99% | 3,885 | 4,979 | – | – | – | – | – | 8,864 | ||
| Montréal-Laurier | Lib | ALN | 2,471 | 35.00% | 872 | 12.35% | 60.15% | 1,594 | 2,471 | – | 1,397 | – | 1,599 | – | 7,061 | ||
| Montréal-Mercier | Lib | Lib | 9,071 | 50.05% | 776 | 4.28% | 71.30% | 9,071 | 8,295 | – | 757 | – | – | – | 18,123 | ||
| Montréal–Saint-Georges | Con | Con | 1,414 | 55.54% | 282 | 11.08% | 49.90% | 1,132 | – | 1,414 | – | – | – | – | 2,546 | ||
| Montréal–Saint-Henri | Lib | ALN | 2,418 | 35.03% | 128 | 1.85% | 67.09% | 2,290 | 2,418 | – | 2,194 | – | – | – | 6,902 | ||
| Montreal–Saint-Jacques | Lib | Con | 3,036 | 50.38% | 46 | 0.76% | 72.49% | 2,990 | – | 3,036 | – | – | – | – | 6,026 | ||
| Montréal–Saint-Laurent | Lib | Lib | 3,351 | 76.72% | 2,334 | 53.43% | 94.25% | 3,351 | – | 1,017 | – | – | – | – | 4,368 | ||
| Montréal–Saint-Louis | Lib | Lib | acclaimed (receiving officer not available to receive opponent's nomination papers)<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> | ||||||||||||||
| Montreal–Sainte-Anne | Lib | I-Lib | 1,541 | 46.25% | 550 | 16.51% | 65.12% | 991 | 716 | – | 1,541 | – | – | 84 | 3,332 | ||
| Montréal–Sainte-Marie | Lib | ALN | 4,782 | 49.92% | 361 | 3.77% | 66.11% | 4,421 | 4,782 | – | – | – | – | 376 | 9,579 | ||
| Montréal-Verdun | Con | Con | 6,518 | 49.06% | 3,017 | 22.71% | 58.53% | 3,501 | – | 6,518 | 3,268 | – | – | – | 13,287 | ||
| Napierville-Laprairie | Lib | Lib | 2,641 | 58.74% | 1,158 | 25.76% | 88.68% | 2,641 | 1,483 | – | 372 | – | – | – | 4,496 | ||
| Nicolet | Lib | Lib | 3,427 | 54.41% | 556 | 8.83% | 79.82% | 3,427 | – | 2,871 | – | – | – | – | 6,298 | ||
| Papineau | Lib | ALN | 4,075 | 56.72% | 966 | 13.45% | 73.11% | 3,109 | 4,075 | – | – | – | – | – | 7,184 | ||
| Pontiac | Lib | Lib | 1,779 | 44.31% | 62 | 1.54% | 67.79% | 1,779 | 1,717 | – | 519 | – | – | – | 4,015 | ||
| Portneuf | Lib | ALN | 4,502 | 56.32% | 1,047 | 13.10% | 84.49% | 3,455 | 4,502 | – | – | – | – | 37 | 7,994 | ||
| Québec-Centre | Lib | ALN | 3,824 | 52.74% | 398 | 5.49% | 80.81% | 3,426 | 3,824 | – | – | – | – | – | 7,250 | ||
| Québec-Comté | Lib | Lib | 3,987 | 48.07% | 234 | 2.82% | 91.36% | 3,987 | 3,753 | – | 554 | – | – | – | 8,294 | ||
| Québec-Est | Lib | ALN | 5,629 | 57.61% | 1,487 | 15.22% | 84.13% | 4,142 | 5,629 | – | – | – | – | – | 9,771 | ||
| Québec-Ouest | Lib | Lib | 1,894 | 58.44% | 547 | 16.88% | 81.71% | 1,894 | – | 1,347 | – | – | – | – | 3,241 | ||
| Richelieu | Lib | Lib | acclaimed (opponent withdrew) | ||||||||||||||
| Richmond | Lib | Con | 3,170 | 55.58% | 637 | 11.17% | 83.23% | 2,533 | – | 3,170 | – | – | – | – | 5,703 | ||
| Rimouski | Lib | Lib | 3,055 | 53.49% | 399 | 6.99% | 79.54% | 3,055 | 2,656 | – | – | – | – | – | 5,711 | ||
| Rivière-du-Loup | Lib | Lib | 3,866 | 59.26% | 1,208 | 18.52% | 84.53% | 3,866 | 2,658 | – | – | – | – | – | 6,524 | ||
| Roberval | Lib | ALN | 3,768 | 60.56% | 1,611 | 25.89% | 81.59% | 2,157 | 3,768 | – | 297 | – | – | – | 6,222 | ||
| Rouville | Con | Con | 1,938 | 53.08% | 225 | 6.16% | 87.16% | 1,713 | – | 1,938 | – | – | – | – | 3,651 | ||
| Saint-Hyacinthe | Lib | Lib | 3,381 | 53.68% | 463 | 7.35% | 86.13% | 3,381 | 2,918 | – | – | – | – | – | 6,299 | ||
| Saint-Jean | Lib | Lib | 2,626 | 63.16% | 1,094 | 26.31% | 79.55% | 2,626 | – | – | – | 1,532 | – | – | 4,158 | ||
| Saint-Maurice | Lib | ALN | 4,219 | 59.72% | 1,373 | 19.43% | 82.05% | 2,846 | 4,219 | – | – | – | – | – | 7,065 | ||
| Saint-Sauveur | Con | Con | 4,184 | 50.51% | 1,082 | 13.06% | 85.80% | 3,102 | – | 4,184 | – | – | – | 998 | 8,284 | ||
| Shefford | Lib | ALN | 3,708 | 53.30% | 459 | 6.60% | 85.29% | 3,249 | 3,708 | – | – | – | – | – | 6,957 | ||
| Sherbrooke | Lib | ALN | 4,777 | 60.68% | 1,681 | 21.35% | 75.06% | 3,096 | 4,777 | – | – | – | – | – | 7,873 | ||
| Soulanges | Lib | Lib | 1,287 | 57.66% | 342 | 15.32% | 85.75% | 1,287 | – | 945 | – | – | – | – | 2,232 | ||
| Stanstead | Lib | ALN | 2,871 | 52.98% | 323 | 5.96% | 77.22% | 2,548 | 2,871 | – | – | – | – | – | 5,419 | ||
| Témiscamingue | Lib | ALN | 2,929 | 53.63% | 1,343 | 24.59% | 70.10% | 1,586 | 2,929 | – | 853 | – | – | 94 | 5,462 | ||
| Témiscouata | Lib | Lib | 2,112 | 53.25% | 258 | 6.51% | 87.03% | 2,112 | 1,854 | – | – | – | – | – | 3,966 | ||
| Terrebonne | Lib | Lib | Returning officer cast sole ballot (all others declared void) | ||||||||||||||
| Trois-Rivières | Con | Con | 4,873 | 57.03% | 1,202 | 14.07% | 86.70% | 3,671 | – | 4,873 | – | – | – | – | 8,544 | ||
| Vaudreuil | Lib | Lib | 1,120 | 37.35% | 65 | 2.17% | 84.65% | 1,120 | – | 824 | 1,055 | – | – | – | 2,999 | ||
| Verchères | Lib | Lib | 2,077 | 64.50% | 934 | 29.01% | 90.87% | 2,077 | 1,143 | – | – | – | – | – | 3,220 | ||
| Westmount | Con | Con | 8,288 | 55.75% | 1,709 | 11.50% | 46.39% | 6,579 | – | 8,288 | – | – | – | – | 14,867 | ||
| Wolfe | Lib | Lib | 2,023 | 51.89% | 147 | 3.77% | 88.27% | 2,023 | 1,876 | – | – | – | – | – | 3,899 | ||
| Yamaska | Con | Con | 2,080 | 52.39% | 190 | 4.79% | 91.93% | 1,890 | – | 2,080 | – | – | – | – | 3,970 | ||
- Template:Color box = open seat
- Template:Color box = turnout is above provincial average
- Template:Color box = winning candidate was in previous Legislature
- Template:Color box = incumbent had switched allegiance
- Template:Color box = not incumbent; was previously elected to the Legislature
- Template:Color box = incumbency arose from byelection gain
- Template:Color box = previously incumbent in another riding
- Template:Color box = other incumbents renominated
- Template:Color box = previously an MP in the House of Commons of Canada
- Template:Color box = multiple candidates
Analysis
| Party in 1st place | Party in 2nd place | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lib | ALN | CON | Ind-Lib | Lib-Opp | Lab | |||
| 26 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 43 | ||||
| Action libérale nationale | 24 | 1 | 1 | 26 | ||||
| 16 | 16 | |||||||
| 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Total | 41 | 26 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 86 | |
| Parties | Acclaimed | Declared | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template:Canadian party colour | 3 | 1 | 43 | 41 | 2 | 90 | |
| Template:Canadian party colour | 26 | 26 | 2 | 54 | |||
| Template:Canadian party colour | 16 | 13 | 2 | 31 | |||
| Template:Canadian party colour | 1 | 4 | 12 | 2 | 19 | ||
| Template:Canadian party colour | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||
| Template:Canadian party colour | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Template:Canadian party colour | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Template:Canadian party colour | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Template:Canadian party colour | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Template:Canadian party colour | 1 | 1 |
| Source | Party | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Lib | ALN | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Con | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Ind-Lib | Total | ||
| Seats retained | Incumbents returned | 31 | 8 | 39 | ||
| Incumbents returned - acclaimed and declared | 4 | 4 | ||||
| Open seats held | 9 | 9 | ||||
| Seats changing hands | Incumbents defeated - new MLAs | 1 | 14 | 5 | 20 | |
| Incumbents defeated - previous members returned | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||
| Open seats gained | 1 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 15 | |
| Incumbent changed allegiance | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Total | 47 | 26 | 16 | 1 | 90 | |
See also
- List of Quebec premiers
- Politics of Quebec
- Timeline of Quebec history
- List of Quebec political parties
- 19th Legislative Assembly of Quebec