1956 Quebec general election
Template:Short description Template:Use mdy dates Template:Infobox election
The 1956 Quebec general election was held on June 20, 1956, to elect members of the Legislative Assembly of Quebec, Canada. The incumbent Union Nationale, led by Maurice Duplessis, won re-election, defeating the Quebec Liberal Party, led by Georges-Émile Lapalme.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
This was the fifth and final time (and the fourth in a row) that Duplessis led his party to a general election victory. No party has since been able to win more than three elections in a row. Duplessis died in office in 1959.Template:Citation needed
It was Lapalme's second (and final) loss in a row as Liberal leader. The Liberals did not manage to improve on their performance in the previous 1952 election.Template:Citation needed
Expansion of the Legislative Assembly and titles
An Act passed in 1954 provided for the creation of the new electoral district of Jonquière-Kénogami for the next election, which was carved out from Chicoutimi and Lac-Saint-Jean.<ref>Template:Cite canlaw</ref> In 1955, a bill was passed designated members of the assembly as Members of Provincial Parliament or MPPs.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Campaign
The Liberals and the Union des électeurs pooled their resources to conduct a joint campaign against the UN in at least 50 ridings.Template:Sfn<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> They collaborated to such a degree that in February 1956 the Liberal MPP René Hamel had proposed a motion espousing social credit theory in the Assembly, and a joint rally was held in May 1956 in Shawinigan to mark that event.<ref name="VD560601"/> While the strategy was viewed within the parties as a means to maximize their strength in opposing the UN, the electorate tended to view it as being confusing,Template:Sfn while the Montreal Gazette called it "an irresponsible alliance".<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> There were also Liberals in the old guard that wanted the UN to win.Template:Sfn
The Liberals supported four UdE and two Nationalist candidates,<ref name="Gazette0621">Template:Cite news</ref> respectively running as Liberals and Independents, of which none won:<ref name="GazEdito">Template:Cite news</ref>
- on the Social Credit side, there were Réal Caouette (Abitibi-Est),<ref name="Gazette0621"/> Arthur Marcoux (Beauce),<ref>Template:Cite news See p. 25 for candidate listings.</ref> Urbain Lajeunesse (Îles-de-la-Madeleine)<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> and Paul-Eugène Drolet (Portneuf),<ref name="VD560601">Template:Cite news</ref>
- René Chaloult<ref name="GazEdito"/> campaigned in the new riding of Jonquière-Kénogami, and came within 320 votes of winning. This would be his last campaign.
- Pierre Laporte,<ref name="GazEdito"/> director of the magazine L'Action nationale and previously parliamentary correspondent for Le Devoir, ran in Montréal-Laurier. He would later campaign and win as a Liberal candidate in a 1961 byelection in Chambly.
One observer noted, "The Union Nationale’s strongly entrenched position could not be seriously challenged unless a united front was formed of all opposing groups."Template:Sfn The UN chose to campaign on Quebec's right to fiscal autonomy, the party's accomplishments and the future of Ungava,Template:Sfn while the Liberals' chances were restrained by their alliance with the UdE (while shutting out the Parti social démocratique), the choice of Chaloult and Laporte not to identify themselves as Liberal candidates, and the party's tendency to side with Ottawa's centralizing policies.Template:Sfn The UN correctly assumed that Quebec voters, when given a choice, would prefer a nationalist policy over a social one.Template:Sfn
| Candidates | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |UN | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Lib | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |PSD | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Lab-Pr | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Ind | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |I-Lib | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |I-UN | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Lab | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |UN-Lab | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |CF | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 50 | 49 | 1 | 100 | |||||||
| 3 | 20 | 20 | 7 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 60 | |||
| 4 | 13 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 52 | ||
| 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 25 | ||
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 12 | |||
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | |||||
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 16 | ||
| Total | 93 | 91 | 26 | 32 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 272 |
Results
Template:Election table<ref name="EQdata">Template:Cite web</ref> |- ! colspan=2 rowspan=2 | Political party ! rowspan=2 | Party leader ! colspan=4 | MPPs ! colspan=4 | Votes |- ! Candidates !1952 !1956 !± !# ! ± !% ! ± (pp) Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"|Maurice Duplessis |93||68||72||4Template:Increase||956,082||108,099Template:Increase||51.80%||1.30Template:Increase Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"|Georges-Émile Lapalme |92||23||20||3Template:Decrease||828,264||59,725Template:Increase||44.87%||0.90Template:Decrease Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"|Thérèse Casgrain |26||–||–||–||11,232||4,807Template:Decrease||0.61%||0.35Template:Decrease Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"|Gui Caron |32||–||–||–||6,517||2,585Template:Increase||0.35%||0.12Template:Increase |- |rowspan="7" Template:Canadian party colour| |style="text-align:left;" colspan="10"|Other candidates |- |style="text-align:left;" |Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"| |7||1||1||Template:No change||33,205||19,359Template:Increase||1.80%||0.98Template:Increase |- |style="text-align:left;" |Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"| |7||–||–||–||4,438||528Template:Decrease||0.24%||0.06Template:Decrease |- |style="text-align:left;" |Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"| |10||–||–||–||4,108||9,089Template:Decrease||0.22%||0.57Template:Decrease |- |style="text-align:left;" |Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"| |3||–||–||–||1,274||247Template:Increase||0.07%||0.01Template:Increase |- |style="text-align:left;" |Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"| |1||–||–||–||516||New||0.03%||New |- |style="text-align:left;" |Template:Canadian party colour |style="text-align:left;"| |1||–||–||–||93||New||0.01%||New |- ! colspan="3" style="text-align:left;" | Total |272||92 ! " colspan="2"|93 ! " colspan="2"|1,845,729 ! " colspan="2"| 100% |- | colspan="7" style="text-align:left;" | Rejected ballots | 28,781 | 3,133Template:Increase | colspan="2"| |- | colspan="7" style="text-align:left;" | Voter turnout | 1,874,510 | 169,599Template:Increase | 78.32 | 2.44Template:Increase |- | colspan="7" style="text-align:left;" | Registered electors | 2,393,360 | 146,362Template:Increase | colspan="2"| |}
Vote and seat summaries
Template:Bar boxTemplate:Bar box
Synopsis of results
| Riding | Winning party | Turnout <ref group=a>including spoilt ballots</ref> |
Votes | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | 1952 | Party | Votes | Share | Margin # |
Margin % |
UN | Lib | Template:Abbr | Template:Abbr | Template:Abbr | Template:Abbr | Template:Abbr | Template:Abbr | Template:Abbr | Total | |||
| Abitibi-Est | UN | UN | 13,967 | 53.94% | 2,200 | 8.50% | 81.31% | 13,967 | 11,767 | – | – | – | – | – | 160 | – | 25,894 | ||
| Abitibi-Ouest | UN | Lib | 6,207 | 50.66% | 161 | 1.31% | 89.27% | 6,046 | 6,207 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 12,253 | ||
| Argenteuil | UN | UN | 7,153 | 55.54% | 1,427 | 11.08% | 86.07% | 7,153 | 5,726 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 12,879 | ||
| Arthabaska | UN | UN | 10,189 | 54.74% | 1,765 | 9.48% | 92.72% | 10,189 | 8,424 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 18,613 | ||
| Bagot | UN | UN | 5,696 | 61.46% | 2,124 | 22.92% | 90.76% | 5,696 | 3,572 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9,268 | ||
| Beauce | UN | UN | 13,432 | 56.66% | 3,158 | 13.32% | 88.52% | 13,432 | 10,274 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 23,706 | ||
| Beauharnois | UN | UN | 11,928 | 58.31% | 3,450 | 16.87% | 87.96% | 11,928 | 8,478 | – | 50 | – | – | – | – | – | 20,456 | ||
| Bellechasse | UN | UN | 6,243 | 57.89% | 1,702 | 15.78% | 82.86% | 6,243 | 4,541 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10,784 | ||
| Berthier | UN | UN | 7,123 | 56.17% | 1,565 | 12.34% | 90.30% | 7,123 | 5,558 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 12,681 | ||
| Bonaventure | UN | Lib | 8,551 | 52.68% | 869 | 5.35% | 84.06% | 7,682 | 8,551 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 16,233 | ||
| Brome | UN | Lib | 3,274 | 51.66% | 245 | 3.87% | 83.36% | 3,029 | 3,274 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 6,338 | ||
| Chambly | UN | Lib | 20,031 | 49.43% | 767 | 1.89% | 76.45% | 19,264 | 20,031 | 877 | 150 | – | 205 | – | – | – | 40,527 | ||
| Champlain | UN | UN | 12,579 | 58.93% | 3,814 | 17.87% | 90.32% | 12,579 | 8,765 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 21,344 | ||
| Charlevoix | UN | UN | 7,729 | 60.37% | 2,655 | 20.74% | 87.17% | 7,729 | 5,074 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 12,803 | ||
| Châteauguay | UN | UN | 5,936 | 57.10% | 1,477 | 14.21% | 85.59% | 5,936 | 4,459 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10,395 | ||
| Chicoutimi | UN | UN | 19,103 | 67.22% | 9,788 | 34.44% | 87.25% | 19,103 | 9,315 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 28,418 | ||
| Compton | UN | Lib | 5,542 | 51.41% | 401 | 3.72% | 85.72% | 5,141 | 5,542 | 98 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10,781 | ||
| Deux-Montagnes | UN | UN | 8,133 | 72.31% | 5,162 | 45.90% | 83.43% | 8,133 | 2,971 | 143 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 11,247 | ||
| Dorchester | UN | UN | 9,569 | 60.74% | 3,385 | 21.49% | 85.40% | 9,569 | 6,184 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 15,753 | ||
| Drummond | Lib | UN | 13,211 | 53.83% | 1,928 | 7.86% | 91.52% | 13,211 | 11,283 | – | 47 | – | – | – | – | – | 24,541 | ||
| Frontenac | Lib | UN | 6,451 | 52.12% | 524 | 4.23% | 89.65% | 6,451 | 5,927 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 12,378 | ||
| Gaspé-Nord | UN | UN | 4,574 | 50.40% | 135 | 1.49% | 84.26% | 4,574 | 4,439 | – | – | 62 | – | – | – | – | 9,075 | ||
| Gaspé-Sud | UN | UN | 8,016 | 56.03% | 1,726 | 12.06% | 85.67% | 8,016 | 6,290 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14,306 | ||
| Gatineau | UN | UN | 8,206 | 55.96% | 1,748 | 11.92% | 76.32% | 8,206 | 6,458 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14,664 | ||
| Hull | UN | Lib | 10,564 | 45.70% | 143 | 0.62% | 83.05% | 10,421 | 10,564 | 157 | 79 | – | – | 1,895 | – | – | 23,116 | ||
| Huntingdon | UN | UN | 3,273 | 52.33% | 291 | 4.65% | 84.69% | 3,273 | 2,982 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 6,255 | ||
| Iberville | UN | UN | 3,903 | 57.22% | 985 | 14.44% | 88.13% | 3,903 | 2,918 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 6,821 | ||
| Îles-de-la-Madeleine | UN | UN | 2,591 | 56.72% | 614 | 13.44% | 89.09% | 2,591 | 1,977 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4,568 | ||
| Jacques-Cartier | Lib | Lib | 31,385 | 55.39% | 9,094 | 16.05% | 70.68% | 22,291 | 31,385 | 2,322 | 668 | – | – | – | – | – | 56,666 | ||
| Joliette | UN | UN | 11,500 | 64.88% | 5,275 | 29.76% | 86.06% | 11,500 | 6,225 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 17,725 | ||
| Jonquière-Kénogami | New | UN | 11,946 | 50.68% | 320 | 1.36% | 88.00% | 11,946 | – | – | – | 11,626 | – | – | – | – | 23,572 | ||
| Kamouraska | UN | UN | 6,489 | 58.30% | 1,847 | 16.59% | 81.48% | 6,489 | 4,642 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 11,131 | ||
| L'Assomption | UN | UN | 7,260 | 55.53% | 1,445 | 11.05% | 87.97% | 7,260 | 5,815 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 13,075 | ||
| L'Islet | UN | UN | 5,322 | 53.25% | 649 | 6.49% | 86.54% | 5,322 | 4,673 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9,995 | ||
| Labelle | UN | UN | 6,717 | 62.07% | 2,658 | 24.56% | 87.41% | 6,717 | 4,059 | – | 46 | – | – | – | – | – | 10,822 | ||
| Lac-Saint-Jean | UN | UN | 8,544 | 54.49% | 1,408 | 8.98% | 92.66% | 8,544 | 7,136 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 15,680 | ||
| Laval | UN | UN | 50,417 | 53.91% | 9,203 | 9.84% | 70.51% | 50,417 | 41,214 | 1,129 | 763 | – | – | – | – | – | 93,523 | ||
| Laviolette | UN | UN | 11,848 | 59.46% | 3,769 | 18.91% | 82.94% | 11,848 | 8,079 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 19,927 | ||
| Lévis | Lib | UN | 12,220 | 54.30% | 2,114 | 9.39% | 90.04% | 12,220 | 10,106 | – | 18 | – | – | 161 | – | – | 22,505 | ||
| Lotbinière | UN | UN | 7,052 | 57.23% | 1,781 | 14.45% | 89.41% | 7,052 | 5,271 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 12,323 | ||
| Maisonneuve | Lib | UN | 20,668 | 50.93% | 2,469 | 6.08% | 68.96% | 20,668 | 18,199 | 227 | 176 | 249 | 119 | 941 | – | – | 40,579 | ||
| Maskinongé | UN | UN | 5,588 | 57.26% | 1,417 | 14.52% | 93.04% | 5,588 | 4,171 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9,759 | ||
| Matane | UN | UN | 10,109 | 57.93% | 2,769 | 15.87% | 84.28% | 10,109 | 7,340 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 17,449 | ||
| Matapédia | UN | UN | 7,205 | 54.66% | 1,229 | 9.32% | 86.00% | 7,205 | 5,976 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 13,181 | ||
| Mégantic | UN | UN | 12,123 | 52.50% | 1,155 | 5.00% | 92.22% | 12,123 | 10,968 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 23,091 | ||
| Missisquoi | UN | UN | 7,001 | 56.72% | 1,658 | 13.43% | 86.03% | 7,001 | 5,343 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 12,344 | ||
| Montcalm | UN | UN | 4,585 | 56.67% | 1,079 | 13.34% | 89.26% | 4,585 | 3,506 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8,091 | ||
| Montmagny | UN | UN | 6,403 | 55.92% | 1,355 | 11.83% | 87.37% | 6,403 | 5,048 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 11,451 | ||
| Montmorency | UN | UN | 6,628 | 59.53% | 2,165 | 19.44% | 90.72% | 6,628 | 4,463 | – | 43 | – | – | – | – | – | 11,134 | ||
| Montréal–Jeanne-Mance | Lib | UN | 29,076 | 49.76% | 3,439 | 5.88% | 66.38% | 29,076 | 25,637 | 334 | 239 | 238 | 1,798 | 91 | 1,025 | – | 58,438 | ||
| Montréal-Laurier | UN | UN | 17,154 | 60.26% | 7,491 | 26.31% | 70.86% | 17,154 | – | – | – | 9,663 | 1,652 | – | – | – | 28,469 | ||
| Montréal-Mercier | UN | UN | 18,165 | 60.03% | 6,705 | 22.16% | 65.79% | 18,165 | 11,460 | 162 | 383 | – | – | – | 89 | – | 30,259 | ||
| Montréal–Notre-Dame-de-Grâce | Lib | Lib | 28,175 | 77.44% | 21,106 | 58.01% | 55.29% | 7,069 | 28,175 | 629 | 510 | – | – | – | – | – | 36,383 | ||
| Montréal-Outremont | Lib | Lib | 24,348 | 67.83% | 14,331 | 39.93% | 55.80% | 10,017 | 24,348 | 726 | 802 | – | – | – | – | – | 35,893 | ||
| Montréal–Saint-Henri | Lib | Lib | 17,344 | 51.30% | 1,960 | 5.80% | 70.57% | 15,384 | 17,344 | 234 | 156 | – | – | 172 | – | 516 | 33,806 | ||
| Montréal–Saint-Jacques | UN | UN | 11,206 | 62.36% | 4,922 | 27.39% | 63.90% | 11,206 | 6,284 | 279 | 200 | – | – | – | – | – | 17,969 | ||
| Montréal–Saint-Louis | Lib | Lib | 12,276 | 49.47% | 2,461 | 9.92% | 52.88% | 9,815 | 12,276 | 425 | 649 | – | 1,650 | – | – | – | 24,815 | ||
| Montréal–Sainte-Anne | Ind | Ind | 10,520 | 66.01% | 6,432 | 40.36% | 60.75% | 587 | 4,088 | 145 | 167 | 10,520 | – | 429 | – | – | 15,936 | ||
| Montréal–Sainte-Marie | Lib | UN | 15,051 | 54.80% | 3,853 | 14.03% | 67.93% | 15,051 | 11,198 | 195 | 172 | 847 | – | – | – | – | 27,463 | ||
| Montréal-Verdun | Lib | Lib | 20,175 | 70.12% | 13,361 | 46.43% | 64.50% | 6,814 | 20,175 | 1,785 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 28,774 | ||
| Napierville-Laprairie | UN | UN | 7,861 | 53.81% | 1,166 | 7.98% | 89.28% | 7,861 | 6,695 | – | 52 | – | – | – | – | – | 14,608 | ||
| Nicolet | UN | UN | 8,498 | 59.33% | 2,673 | 18.66% | 86.53% | 8,498 | 5,825 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14,323 | ||
| Papineau | UN | UN | 11,164 | 56.21% | 2,467 | 12.42% | 87.78% | 11,164 | 8,697 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 19,861 | ||
| Pontiac | UN | UN | 6,201 | 71.83% | 3,769 | 43.66% | 79.30% | 6,201 | 2,432 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8,633 | ||
| Portneuf | UN | UN | 12,810 | 60.72% | 4,523 | 21.44% | 87.52% | 12,810 | 8,287 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 21,097 | ||
| Québec-Centre | UN | UN | 10,983 | 60.18% | 3,715 | 20.36% | 81.48% | 10,983 | 7,268 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 18,251 | ||
| Québec-Comté | Lib | UN | 21,272 | 56.22% | 5,047 | 13.34% | 85.59% | 21,272 | 16,225 | – | 63 | – | – | 280 | – | – | 37,840 | ||
| Québec-Est | Lib | UN | 20,173 | 55.47% | 4,090 | 11.25% | 85.85% | 20,173 | 16,083 | – | 112 | – | – | – | – | – | 36,368 | ||
| Québec-Ouest | Lib | Lib | 10,073 | 50.40% | 158 | 0.79% | 82.76% | 9,915 | 10,073 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 19,988 | ||
| Richelieu | Lib | UN | 9,552 | 54.28% | 1,590 | 9.03% | 89.78% | 9,552 | 7,962 | 66 | 19 | – | – | – | – | – | 17,599 | ||
| Richmond | Lib | Lib | 9,470 | 51.49% | 742 | 4.03% | 90.47% | 8,728 | 9,470 | – | 194 | – | – | – | – | – | 18,392 | ||
| Rimouski | UN | Lib | 9,911 | 51.05% | 408 | 2.10% | 85.03% | 9,503 | 9,911 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 19,414 | ||
| Rivière-du-Loup | UN | Lib | 8,623 | 51.24% | 556 | 3.30% | 87.88% | 8,067 | 8,623 | – | – | – | – | 139 | – | – | 16,829 | ||
| Roberval | UN | UN | 10,903 | 52.50% | 1,038 | 5.00% | 88.94% | 10,903 | 9,865 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 20,768 | ||
| Rouville | UN | UN | 5,277 | 52.84% | 567 | 5.68% | 87.54% | 5,277 | 4,710 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9,987 | ||
| Rouyn-Noranda | UN | Lib | 7,561 | 51.16% | 1,007 | 6.81% | 84.35% | 6,554 | 7,561 | 665 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14,780 | ||
| Saguenay | UN | UN | 10,899 | 58.60% | 3,198 | 17.19% | 75.91% | 10,899 | 7,701 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 18,600 | ||
| Saint-Hyacinthe | UN | Lib | 9,965 | 51.67% | 669 | 3.47% | 83.85% | 9,296 | 9,965 | – | 24 | – | – | – | – | – | 19,285 | ||
| Saint-Jean | UN | UN | 8,279 | 56.17% | 1,901 | 12.90% | 85.62% | 8,279 | 6,378 | 55 | 27 | – | – | – | – | – | 14,739 | ||
| Saint-Maurice | Lib | Lib | 13,851 | 51.37% | 741 | 2.75% | 90.44% | 13,110 | 13,851 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 26,961 | ||
| Saint-Sauveur | UN | UN | 16,117 | 68.77% | 8,862 | 37.81% | 87.43% | 16,117 | 7,255 | – | 64 | – | – | – | – | – | 23,436 | ||
| Shefford | Lib | UN | 11,534 | 53.59% | 1,627 | 7.56% | 85.31% | 11,534 | 9,907 | – | 82 | – | – | – | – | – | 21,523 | ||
| Sherbrooke | UN | UN | 16,588 | 55.30% | 3,438 | 11.46% | 78.62% | 16,588 | 13,150 | 73 | 185 | – | – | – | – | – | 29,996 | ||
| Stanstead | UN | UN | 7,815 | 50.26% | 81 | 0.52% | 82.63% | 7,815 | 7,734 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 15,549 | ||
| Témiscamingue | Lib | UN | 4,078 | 50.83% | 133 | 1.66% | 86.26% | 4,078 | 3,945 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8,023 | ||
| Témiscouata | UN | UN | 6,299 | 59.35% | 1,985 | 18.70% | 85.36% | 6,299 | 4,314 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10,613 | ||
| Terrebonne | UN | UN | 20,984 | 57.57% | 5,704 | 15.65% | 85.34% | 20,984 | 15,280 | 107 | 77 | – | – | – | – | – | 36,448 | ||
| Trois-Rivières | UN | UN | 16,263 | 61.73% | 6,327 | 24.02% | 88.23% | 16,263 | 9,936 | – | 52 | – | – | – | – | 93 | 26,344 | ||
| Vaudreuil-Soulanges | UN | UN | 7,681 | 51.00% | 370 | 2.46% | 85.94% | 7,681 | 7,311 | 70 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 15,062 | ||
| Verchères | Lib | UN | 5,104 | 53.06% | 627 | 6.52% | 89.67% | 5,104 | 4,477 | 39 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9,620 | ||
| Westmount–Saint-Georges | Lib | Lib | 13,808 | 80.05% | 10,870 | 63.02% | 51.26% | 2,938 | 13,808 | 255 | 248 | – | – | – | – | – | 17,249 | ||
| Wolfe | Lib | UN | 4,058 | 50.31% | 50 | 0.62% | 93.33% | 4,058 | 4,008 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8,066 | ||
| Yamaska | UN | UN | 4,736 | 66.22% | 2,320 | 32.44% | 85.90% | 4,736 | 2,416 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 7,152 | ||
- Template:Color box = open seat
- Template:Color box = turnout is above provincial average
- Template:Color box = winning candidate was in previous Legislature
- Template:Color box = incumbent had switched allegiance
- Template:Color box = not incumbent; was previously elected to the Legislature
- Template:Color box = incumbency arose from byelection gain
- Template:Color box = previously incumbent in another riding
- Template:Color box = other incumbents renominated
- Template:Color box = UdE candidates under the Liberal banner
- Template:Color box = Nationalist candidates supported by the Liberals
- Template:Color box = multiple candidates
Analysis
| Party in 1st place | Party in 2nd place | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UN | Lib | Ind | |||
| 70 | 2 | 72 | |||
| 20 | 20 | ||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||
| Total | 20 | 71 | 2 | 93 | |
| Parties | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template:Canadian party colour | 72 | 20 | 1 | 93 | ||
| Template:Canadian party colour | 20 | 71 | 92 | |||
| Template:Canadian party colour | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |
| Template:Canadian party colour | 16 | 6 | 2 | 24 | ||
| Template:Canadian party colour | 13 | 11 | 5 | 29 | ||
| Template:Canadian party colour | 5 | 3 | 1 | 9 | ||
| Template:Canadian party colour | 3 | 2 | 5 | |||
| Template:Canadian party colour | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||
| Template:Canadian party colour | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Template:Canadian party colour | 1 | 1 |
| Source | Party | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |UN | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Lib | Template:Canadian party colour align="center" |Ind | Total | ||
| Seats retained | Incumbents returned | 55 | 9 | 1 | 65 |
| Open seats held | 3 | 1 | 4 | ||
| Seats changing hands | Incumbents defeated | 9 | 6 | 15 | |
| Incumbents defeated - previous incumbents returned | 3 | 3 | |||
| Open seats gained | 1 | 4 | 5 | ||
| New ridings | New MPP elected | 1 | 1 | ||
| Total | 72 | 20 | 1 | 93 | |
See also
- List of Quebec premiers
- Politics of Quebec
- Timeline of Quebec history
- List of Quebec political parties
- 25th Legislative Assembly of Quebec