Book review

From Vero - Wikipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:About Template:Redirect Template:Redirect A book review is a form of literary criticism in which a book is described, and usually further analyzed based on content, style, and merit.<ref name="Princeton">Template:Cite web</ref> A book review may be a primary source, an opinion piece, a summary review, or a scholarly view.<ref name="VirginiaTech">Template:Cite web</ref> Books can be reviewed for printed periodicals, magazines, and newspapers, as school work, or for book websites on the Internet. A book review's length may vary from a single paragraph to a substantial essay. Such a review may evaluate the book based on personal taste. Reviewers may use the occasion of a book review for an extended essay that can be closely or loosely related to the subject of the book, or to promulgate their ideas on the topic of a fiction or non-fiction work.

Some journals are devoted to book reviews, and reviews are indexed in databases such as the Book Review Index and Kirkus Reviews; but many more book reviews can be found in newspaper and scholarly databases such as Arts and Humanities Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, and discipline-specific databases.

History

Photios I of Constantinople has been called "the inventor of the book review" for his work, Bibliotheca.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Types of reviews

Academic reviews

Academic book reviews are both a form of academic service and a contribution to the academic literature.<ref name=":0">Template:Cite journal</ref> They are frequently published as a section or part of academic journals.<ref name=":1">Template:Cite journal</ref> They help the profession understand what has been happening in their profession, and work on the emerging intellectual challenges of their field.<ref name=":0" /> However, not all academics are incentivized to take on the work required in a book review, because they are often not rewarded for that work.<ref name=":0" /> Book reviews can be used to predict which monographs are likely to have subsequent citations.<ref name=":1" />

Newspaper and magazine reviews

Newspaper reviews became prominent in the 18h century, as a form of reader responses.<ref name="Lavin">Template:Cite journal</ref> They were common throughout the 19th and 20th century. However, the decline of newspapers began in the 21st century, and book reviews have suffered along with other newspaper sections. The Associated Press (a service many newspapers subscribe to that produces articles shared among all of them) announced it would no longer be producing book reviews in 2025, although they would still publish stories about current events that intersect with major books.<ref>Template:Cite newspaper</ref>

In academic criticism, popular book reviews in newspapers and magazine reviews are often used to evaluate the relative audience and impact of books during a period.<ref name="Lavin"/>

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Further reading

  • Chen, C. C. (1976), Biomedical, Scientific and Technical Book Reviewing, Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, NJ.
  • Template:Cite journal
  • Template:Cite journal
  • Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y. (1998). Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities. The flow of ideas within and among disciplines. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
  • Miranda, E. O. (1996), "On book reviewing", Journal of Educational Thought, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 191–202.
  • Motta-Roth, D. (1998), "Discourse analysis and academic book reviews: a study of text and disciplinary cultures", in Fortanet, I. (Ed), Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes, Universitat Jaume, Castelló de la Plana, pp. 29–58.
  • Template:Cite web
  • Template:Cite journal
  • Template:Cite book
  • Template:Cite book
  • Rampola, Mary Lynn (2010). "Critiques and book reviews", A Pocket Guide to Writing in History, Sixth Edition, pp. 26–28.
  • Riley, L. E. & Spreitzer, E. A. (1970), "Book reviewing in the social sciences", The American Sociologist, Vol. 5 (November), pp. 358–363.
  • Template:Cite journal
  • Template:Cite journal
  • Template:Cite journal
  • Snizek, W. E. & Fuhrman, E. R. (1979), "Some factors affecting the evaluative content of book reviews in sociology", The American Sociologist, Vol. 14 (May), pp. 108–114.
  • Template:Cite journal
  • Template:Cite journal

Template:Wikiversity

Template:BooksTemplate:Authority control