Cordon sanitaire (medicine)

From Vero - Wikipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Use dmy dates

A loosely enforced cordon sanitaire during a cholera epidemic in Romania, 1911

A cordon sanitaire (Template:IPA, French for "sanitary cordon") is the restriction of movement of people into or out of a defined geographic area, such as a community, region, or country.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> The term originally denoted a barrier used to stop the spread of infectious diseases. The term is also often used metaphorically, in English, to refer to attempts to prevent the spread of an ideology deemed unwanted or dangerous,<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> such as the containment policy adopted by George F. Kennan against the Soviet Union (see cordon sanitaire in politics). Template:TOC limit

Origin

The term cordon sanitaire dates to 1821, when the Duke Armand of Richelieu deployed French troops to the border between Bourbon France and Spain under the Trienio Liberal to prevent yellow fever from spreading into France.<ref name="Taylor" /><ref name="Nichols" />

Definition

Map of the cordon sanitaire around Porto during an outbreak of the bubonic plague in 1899.
In the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic in Kazakhstan, two cities (the only places which had infections at the time) were subdivided into zones, with roadblocks between them, and movement heavily restricted. 2020.

A cordon sanitaire is generally created around an area experiencing an epidemic or an outbreak of infectious disease, or along the border between two nations. Once the cordon is established, people from the affected area are no longer allowed to leave or enter it. In the most extreme form, the cordon is not lifted until the infection is extinguished.<ref name="McNeil">Template:Cite news</ref> Traditionally, the line around a cordon sanitaire was quite physical; a fence or wall was built, armed troops patrolled, and inside, inhabitants were left to battle the affliction without help. In some cases, a "reverse cordon sanitaire" (also known as protective sequestration) may be imposed on healthy communities that are attempting to keep an infection from being introduced. Public health specialists have included cordon sanitaire along with quarantine and medical isolation as "nonpharmaceutical interventions" designed to prevent the transmission of microbial pathogens through social distancing.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

The cordon sanitaire is not used now in its most extreme historical form, mainly due to our improved understanding of disease transmission, treatment and prevention. Today its function is primarily to facilitate the identification of infectious disease and to prevent its transmission. In its more traditional role, the cordon also remains a useful intervention under conditions in which: 1) the infection is highly virulent (contagious and likely to cause illness); 2) the case fatality rate is very high; 3) treatment is nonexistent or difficult; and 4) there is no vaccine, or other means of immunizing large numbers of people (such as needles or syringes) are lacking.<ref name = "Kaplan"/> During the COVID-19 pandemic cordons sanitaires were imposed on geographic regions around the world in an attempt to contain the infection.<ref>Template:Cite magazine</ref>

16th century

17th century

  • In 1655, cordon sanitaire was imposed on the town of Żabbar in Malta after a plague outbreak was detected. The disease spread to other settlements and similar restrictive measures were imposed, and the outbreak was successfully contained after causing 20 deaths.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
  • In May 1666, the English village of Eyam famously imposed a cordon sanitaire on itself after an outbreak of the bubonic plague in the community. During the next 14 months almost eighty percent of the inhabitants died.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> A perimeter of stones was laid out surrounding the village and no one passed the boundary in either direction until November 1667, when the pestilence had run its course. Neighbouring communities provided food for Eyam, leaving supplies in designated locations along the boundary cordon and receiving payment in coins "disinfected" by running water or vinegar.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>Template:Rp

18th century

19th century

20th century

21st century

Ethical considerations

Guidance on when and how human rights can be restricted to prevent the spread of infectious disease is found in the Siracusa Principles, a non-binding document developed by the Siracusa International Institute for Criminal Justice and Human Rights and adopted by the United Nations Economic and Social Council in 1984.<ref>United Nations Economic and Social Council UN Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, "The Siracusa Principles on the limitation and derogation provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights," Section I.A.12 UN Doc. E/CN.4/1985/4, Annex. Geneva, Switzerland: UNHCR; 1985. www.unhcr.org, accessed 5 February 2020</ref> The Siracusa Principles state that restrictions on human rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights must meet standards of legality, evidence-based necessity, proportionality, and gradualism, noting that public health can be used as grounds for limiting certain rights if the state needs to take measures "aimed at preventing disease or injury or providing care for the sick and injured." Limitations on rights (such as a cordon sanitaire) must be "strictly necessary," meaning that they must:

  • respond to a pressing public or social need (health)
  • proportionately pursue a legitimate aim (prevent the spread of infectious disease)
  • be the least restrictive means required for achieving the purpose of the limitation
  • be provided for and carried out in accordance with the law
  • be neither arbitrary nor discriminatory
  • only limit rights that are within the jurisdiction of the state seeking to impose the limitation.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

In addition, when a cordon sanitaire is imposed, public health ethics specify that:

  • all restrictive actions must be well-supported by data and scientific evidence
  • all information must be made available to the public
  • all actions must be explained clearly to those whose rights are restricted and to the public
  • all actions must be subject to regular review and reconsideration.

Finally, the state is ethically obligated to guarantee that:

  • infected people will not be threatened or abused
  • basic needs such as food, water, medical care, and preventive care will be provided
  • communication with loved ones and with caretakers will be permitted
  • constraints on freedom will be applied equally, regardless of social considerations
  • those who are affected will be compensated fairly for economic and material losses, including salary.<ref>M. Pabst Battin, Leslie P. Francis, Jay A. Jacobson, The Patient as Victim and Vector: Ethics and Infectious Disease, Oxford University Press, 2009. Template:ISBN</ref>

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Template:Authority control Template:Italic title