Epistle to Titus

Titus 1:11–15 on Papyrus 32 (recto; Template:Circa)<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

The Epistle to TitusTemplate:Efn is one of the three pastoral epistles (along with 1 Timothy and 2 Timothy) in the New Testament, historically attributed to Paul the Apostle. It is addressed to Saint Titus and describes the requirements and duties of presbyters/bishops.

Text

The epistle is divided into three chapters, 46 verses in total.<ref>Template:Bibleverse</ref>

Recipient

Not mentioned in the Acts of the Apostles, Saint Titus was noted in Galatians (cf. Galatians 2:1, 3)<ref>Template:Bibleverse</ref> where Paul wrote of journeying to Jerusalem with Barnabas, accompanied by Titus. He was then dispatched to Corinth, Greece, where he successfully reconciled the Christian community there with Paul, its founder. Titus was later left on the island of Crete to help organize the Church there, and later met back with the Apostle Paul in Nicopolis. He soon went to Dalmatia (now Croatia). According to Eusebius of Caesarea in the Ecclesiastical History, he served as the first bishop of Crete.<ref>Eusebius, Church History III.4</ref>

Authenticity

Template:Further According to Clare Drury, the claim that Paul himself wrote this letter and those to Timothy "seems at first sight obvious and incontrovertible. All three begin with a greeting from the apostle and contain personal notes and asides", but in reality "things are not so straightforward: signs of the late date of the letters proliferate".<ref>Drury, C., 73. The Pastoral Epistles, in Barton, J. and Muddiman, J. (2001), The Oxford Bible Commentary Template:Webarchive, p. 1220</ref> There has therefore been some debate regarding the authenticity of the letter.

Opposition to Pauline authenticity

Titus, along with the two other pastoral epistles (1 Timothy and 2 Timothy), is regarded by some scholars as being pseudepigraphical.<ref name="forged">Template:Cite book</ref> On the basis of the language and content of the pastoral epistles, these scholars reject that they were written by Paul and believe that they were written by an anonymous forger after his death. Critics claim the vocabulary and style of the Pauline letters could not have been written by Paul according to available biographical information and reflect the views of the emerging Church rather than the apostle's. These scholars date the epistle from the 80s AD up to the end of the 2nd century, though most would place it sometime between 80 and 100 AD.<ref>Raymond E. Brown. An Introduction to the New Testament. New York: Anchor Bible, p. 662, 668.</ref> The Church of England's Common Worship Lectionary Scripture Commentary concurs with this view: "the proportioning of the theological and practical themes is one factor that leads us to think of these writings as coming from the post-Pauline church world of the late first or early second century".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Titus has a very close affinity with 1 Timothy, sharing similar phrases and expressions and similar subject matter.<ref>William Paley Horae Paulinae (1785)</ref><ref>Bart D. Ehrman. The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. pp. 385ff</ref> This has led many scholars to believe that it was written by the same author who wrote 1 and 2 Timothy: their author is sometimes referred to as "the Pastor".<ref name =HarrisPastoral>Harris, Stephen L., Understanding the Bible. Palo Alto: Mayfield. 1985, "The Pastoral Epistles", pp. 340–345</ref>

The gnostic writer Basilides rejected the epistle.<ref> Template:Cite wikisource </ref>

Traditional view: Pauline authenticity

The first page of the epistle in Minuscule 699 gives its title as Template:Lang, 'To Titus.'

Recent scholarship has revived the theory that Paul used an amanuensis, or secretaries, in writing his letters (e.g. Romans 16:22),<ref>Template:Bibleverse</ref> but possibly Luke for the pastorals.<ref>George W. Knight, The Pastoral Epistles: A Commentary on the Greek Text, New International Greek Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI; Carlisle, England: W.B. Eerdmans; Paternoster Press, 1992), 48.</ref><ref>William D. Mounce, Pastoral Epistles, vol. 46, Word Biblical Commentary (Dallas: Word, Incorporated, 2000), cxxix.</ref> This was a common practice in ancient letter writing, even for the biblical writers.<ref>Richards, E. Randolph. Paul and First-Century Letter Writing: Secretaries, Composition and Collection. Downers Grove, IL; Leicester, England: InterVarsity Press; Apollos, 2004.</ref><ref>Harry Y. Gamble, "Amanuensis", ed. David Noel Freedman, The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (New York: Doubleday, 1992), 172.</ref>

Epimenides paradox

One of the secular peculiarities of the Epistle to Titus is the reference to the Epimenides paradox: "One of the Cretans, a prophet of their own, said, 'Cretans are always liars'."<ref>Template:Bibleverse</ref>

See also

• Authorship of the Pauline epistles
• Faithful saying
• Textual variants in the Epistle to Titus

Sources

• Template:EBD

External links

Online translations of the Epistle to Titus:

• Online Bible at GospelHall.org
• Early Christian Writings: Titus
• Titus – King James Version
• Template:Librivox book Various versions

Exegetical papers on Titus:

• An Exegesis of Titus Chapter Two by David Moore
• Chapter Three Exegesis by Snowden G. Sims