Equivocation

From Vero - Wikipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Otheruses

In logic, equivocation ("calling two different things by the same name") is an informal fallacy resulting in the failure to define one's terms, or knowingly and deliberately using words in a different sense than the one the audience will understand.<ref name="Damer2008">Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Citation</ref><ref>Template:Citation</ref>

It is a type of ambiguity that stems from a phrase having two or more distinct meanings, not from the grammar or structure of the sentence.<ref name="Damer2008"/>

Fallacy of four terms

Template:Main

Equivocation in a syllogism (a chain of reasoning) produces a fallacy of four terms (Template:Lang). Below is an example:

Since only man [human] is rational.
And no woman is a man [male].
Therefore, no woman is rational.<ref name="Damer2008" />

The first instance of "man" implies the entire human species, while the second implies just those who are male.

Motte-and-bailey fallacy

Template:Main

The motte (raised area) and bailey (walled courtyard) defenses at Launceston Castle

Equivocation can also be used to conflate two positions which share similarities, one modest and easy to defend and one much more controversial. The arguer advances the controversial position, but when challenged, they insist that they are only advancing the more modest position.

See also

Template:Portal Template:Div col

Template:Div col end

References

Template:Reflist

Template:Fallacies