Imminent lawless action

"Imminent lawless action" is one of several legal standards American courts use to determine whether certain speech is protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The standard was first established in 1969 in the United States Supreme Court case Brandenburg v. Ohio.<ref>Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969). Archived from the original on March 23, 2022. Retrieved March 26, 2022.</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

History

Brandenburg clarified what constituted a "clear and present danger", the standard established by Schenck v. United States (1919) and overruled by Whitney v. California (1927), which had held that speech that merely advocated violence could be made illegal. Under the imminent lawless action test, speech is not protected by the First Amendment if the speaker intends to incite a violation of the law that is both imminent and likely. While the precise meaning of "imminent" may be ambiguous in some cases, the Supreme Court provided later clarification in Hess v. Indiana (1973), which found that Hess's words were protected under "his rights to free speech",<ref name="HessIndiana">Hess v. Indiana, {{#ifeq:no|no |{{#if:

 |{{#if:
    |[[{{{link}}}|{{{name}}}]], 
    |{{#ifexist:{{{name}}}
      |{{#ifeq:{{{name}}}|Imminent lawless action
        |{{{name}}}
        |[[{{{name}}}]]
      }}
    |{{{name}}}
    }}, 
  }}

}}{{#if:|No. {{#ifeq:|no

 |{{{docket}}}, 
 |{{#switch:{{{source}}}
   |f = {{{docket}}}
   |#default = {{{docket}}}
   }}, 
 }}

}}{{#if:414

 |414
 |___

}} {{#ifeq:|no

   |US
   |U.S.

}} {{#if:|({{{5}}} {{{4}}}) }}{{#if:105

 |{{#ifeq:|no
   |105{{#if:|, {{{pin}}}|}}
   |{{#switch:
     |f = 105{{#if:|, {{{pin}}}}}
     |o = 105{{#if:|, {{{pin}}}}}
     |w = 105{{#if:|, {{{pin}}}}}
     |#default = 105{{#if:|, {{{pin}}}}}
   }}
 }} 
 |___

}}{{#if:

 |, slip op. at {{{slip}}}

}}{{#if:1973| (1973) }} |{{#if:

 |{{#if:
    |[[{{{link}}}|{{{name}}}]], 
    |{{{name}}}, 
  }}

}}{{#if:414

 |414 {{#ifeq:|no
   |US 
   |U.S. 
 }}
 |}}{{#if:
 |at {{{pin}}}
 |{{#if:
   |slip op. at {{{slip}}}
   |at ___
 }}

}} }}{{#if:

 | ({{{dissenter}}}, {{#if:
   |{{{dissent-type}}}
   |dissenting
 }})
 |{{#if:
   | ({{{concurrer}}}, {{#if:
     |{{{concurrence-type}}}
     |concurring
   }})
 }}

}}.</ref> in part because his speech "amounted to nothing more than advocacy of illegal action at some indefinite future time,"<ref name="HessIndiana" /> and therefore did not meet the imminence requirement.

The two legal prongs that constitute incitement of imminent lawless action are as follows:

Advocacy of force or criminal activity does not receive First Amendment protections if (1) the advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action, and (2) is likely to incite or produce such action.<ref name="auto">Template:Caselaw source</ref>

Quotation

Template:Quote

References

Template:Reflist

External links

Template:US1stAmendment Freedom of Speech Clause Supreme Court case law

Template:US government sources Template:Law-term-stub

Imminent lawless action

Contents

History

Quotation

See also

References

Further reading

External links

Navigation menu

Imminent lawless action

History

Quotation

See also

References

Further reading

External links

Navigation menu

Search