Largest naval battle in history

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description

A romantic style painting of the Battle of Salamis by Wilhelm von Kaulbach

The "largest naval battle in history" is a disputed title between adherents of varying criteria which include the numbers of personnel or vessels involved in the naval battle, the total displacement of the vessels involved and sometimes the significance and implications of the battle. While battles fought in modern times are comparatively well-documented, the figures from those in pre-Renaissance era are generally believed by contemporary chroniclers to be exaggerated.

Helmut Pemsel's evaluation

In 1975, the Austrian historian Template:Ill attempted to evaluate naval battles in history by a scoring system. He assigned a score to each of four aspects of a battle as follows:

  • Numbers involved (1–4)
  • Strategic significance (0–2)
  • Tactical execution (0–2)
  • Political significance (0–1)

According to him, the largest naval battle ever is the Battle of Leyte Gulf, scoring 8 of a possible 9 points total, while six others tied for second at 7 points each: Salamis, the Aegates, Actium, Barfleur and La Hougue, Trafalgar and Jutland.<ref>Pemsel, Helmut (1977). A History of War at Sea. Naval Institute Press. pp. 155–56. Original German edition published in 1975</ref>

Candidates

  • Salamis, September 480Template:NbspBC. A fleet of 371 Greek ships defeated 600–900 Persian ships in this decisive battle off the coast of Athens. The high-end estimate of 1,271 ships involved is the largest number of ships involved in a single battle. Greek triremes typically had crews of about 200 men, and the smaller penteconters were each crewed by 50 oarsmen, yet the total number of personnel involved in the battle is uncertain.
    The Naval Battle Near Ecnomus (256 BC) by Gabriel de Saint-Aubin
  • Cape Ecnomus, 256Template:NbspBC. One of Ancient Rome's first major naval victories over its rival, the city of Carthage, during the First Punic War. In total the Roman fleet had 140,000 men on board: rowers, other crew, marines and soldiers.<ref name="Lazenby">Template:Cite book</ref> The number of Carthaginians is less certainly known but was estimated by Polybius at 150,000, and most modern historians broadly support this. If these figures are approximately correct, then this is possibly the largest naval battle of all time, by the number of combatants involved.<ref name="Lazenby"/><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

  • Red Cliffs, winter of 208–209 AD. A decisive battle between the warlord Cao Cao and the warlords Sun Quan, Liu Bei and Liu Qi saw the much smaller allied force of 50,000 defeat Cao Cao's at least 220,000-strong force. The precise estimates of numbers are likely lost to time, but it may be the largest in terms of participants as supported by some sources.<ref name="Norwich">{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=web }}</ref>

The four main actions in the Battle of Leyte Gulf: 1 Battle of the Sibuyan Sea 2 Battle of Surigao Strait 3 Battle off Cape Engaño 4 Battle off Samar. Leyte Gulf is north of 2 and west of 4. The island of Leyte is west of the gulf.

References

Notes

Template:Reflist

Bibliography

General

  • Fuller, J. F. C. The Decisive Battles of the Western World and their Influence upon History, 3 vols. (Eyre & Spottiswoode, London, 1954–1956)
    • Volume 1: From the earliest times to the battle of Lepanto
    • Volume 2: From the defeat of the Spanish Armada to the battle of Waterloo
    • Volume 3: From the American Civil War to the end of the Second World War
      • A source for entries on Salamis, Actium, Sluys, Lepanto, the Defeat of the Spanish Armada, Trafalgar, Midway and Leyte Gulf.