National interest

Template:Short description Template:About Template:Redirect Template:UpdateThe national interest is a sovereign state's goals and ambitions – be they economic, military, cultural, or otherwise – taken to be the aim of its government.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

Etymology

The Italian phrase ragione degli stati was first used by Giovanni della Casa around the year 1547.<ref name="chp">Template:Cite book</ref>

The expression "reason of state" (ragione di stato) was formulated in 1580, found in the works of Giovanni Botero, who was influenced by, and wrote criticisms of the Italian diplomat and political thinker Niccolò Machiavelli, popularly known as the author of The Prince and the Discourses on Livy.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name="chp"/> Prominently, Chief Minister Cardinal Richelieu justified France's intervention on the Protestant side, despite its own Catholicism, in the Thirty Years' War (1618–48) as being in the national interest in order to block the increasing power of the Catholic Holy Roman Emperor.Template:Citation needed At Richelieu's prompting, Jean de Silhon defended the concept of raison d'État as "a mean between what conscience permits and affairs require."<ref name="Thuau">Thuau, E. 1996. Raison d'État et Pensée Politique a l'époque de Richelieu. Paris: Armand Colin.</ref><ref>Church, W.F. 1973. Richelieu and Reason of State. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 168.</ref><ref>Franklin, J. 2001. The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability Before Pascal. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 80–81.</ref>

Usage

Within the field of international relations, national interest has frequently been assumed to comprise the pursuit of power, security and wealth.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name=":0">Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name="Brouwer">Template:Cite web</ref> Neorealist and liberal institutionalist scholars tend to define national interest as revolving around security and power.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Liberal scholars view national interests as an aggregation of the preferences of domestic political groups.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Constructivist scholars reject that the national interest of states are static and can be assumed a priori; rather, they argue that the preferences of states are shaped through social interactions and are changeable.<ref name=":0" /><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

In a February 2020 article for CSIS, Gordon de Brouwer argued: "The national interest has three components—security, prosperity, and social wellbeing—and they should all be part of framing the problem and solutions. All three matter. More than ever, they reinforce each other. Security underpins prosperity, prosperity creates power and pays for security, and a well-functioning society reduces economic and security risks."<ref name="Brouwer"/>

See also

• Common good
• Moral nihilism
• Nation state
• Public opinion
• Public interest
• Realpolitik
• Realism (international relations)
• Self-interest

References

<references/>

Further reading

• Beard, Charles A. 1934. The Idea of National Interest. Macmillan.
• Burchill, Scott. 2005. The National Interest in International Relations Theory. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Frankel, Joseph. 1970. National Interest. London: Pall Mall.
• Hu, Shaohua. 2016. "A Framework for analysis of national interest: United States policy toward Taiwan." Contemporary Security Policy 37(1):144–167.
• Nuechterlein, Donald. 1976. "National interests and foreign policy: A conceptual framework for analysis and decision-making." British Journal of International Studies 2(3): 246–266.
• Rosenau, James. 1968. "National Interest." pp. 34–40 in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 2(1), edited by D. L. Sills and R. K. Merton. New York: Macmillan/Free Press.
• Troianiello, Antonino. 1999. Raison d’État et droit public, Thesis paper, Université du Havre, 748 pages.