Nova (NASA rocket)

From Vero - Wikipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:About Template:Use American English Template:Use mdy dates

File:Nova Rocket.jpg
Very early concept diagrams, April 1962, of [from left to right] the Saturn I, Saturn V and "Nova C8" rockets. (Each concept included one additional stage, one that was omitted entirely from the Saturn I and eventually replaced by the Lunar Module Adapter on the Saturn IB and Saturn V.)

Nova was a series of NASA's rocket designs that were proposed both before and after the Saturn V rocket used in the Apollo program. Nova was NASA's first large launcher proposed in 1958, for missions similar to what Saturn V was subsequently used for. The Nova and Saturn V designs closely mirrored each other in basic concept, power, size, and function. Differences were minor but practical, and the Saturn was ultimately selected for the Apollo program, largely because it would reuse existing facilities to a greater extent and could make it to the pad somewhat earlier.

During a series of post-Apollo studies in the late 1960s, considerations for a crewed mission to Mars revealed the need for boosters much larger than Apollo's, and a new series of designs with as many as eight Rocketdyne F-1 engines were developed under the Nova name (along with the Saturn MLV). The image of the Nova C8 is commonly used as a representative of the entire Nova series, and many references to Nova refer specifically to these post-Apollo versions. The two series of designs were, essentially, separate, but shared their name. Thus, "Nova" does not refer to a specific rocket design, just a rocket larger than the Saturn V in most cases. Nova was the name used by NASA in the early 1960s for a super booster in the Template:Convert thrust range.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Lunar rockets

The first Nova series was designed in-house at NASA in 1958. This project examined several designs, the smallest having four F-1s in the lower stage and J-2s in the upper stages. This design placed 24 tons in a lunar injection trajectory. These designs were presented to President Dwight D. Eisenhower on January 27, 1959.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

The Nova designs were not the only lunar rockets being considered at the time. The U.S. Air Force was in the process of defining its Lunex Project, including a massive booster design using a cluster of solid fuel rockets in the lower stage with liquid hydrogen-powered uppers mounting the J-2 or M-1. Meanwhile, at the US Army's Redstone Arsenal, Wernher von Braun was developing his "Juno V" design, using a cluster of Jupiter and Redstone related engines and tanks for a lower stage, a Titan I missile as the second stage.

In 1959 the Army decided it was no longer interested in developing large boosters, for which it had no immediate need, and it passed von Braun's team over to NASA. This left NASA with two large booster designs: its own Nova, and von Braun's recently renamed Saturn ("the one after Jupiter"). Over the next two years the competing NASA and Air Force studies continued, but immediately following President John F. Kennedy's call to reach the Moon before the end of the decade, NASA was given the mission and work on Lunex ended.

Originally, NASA had designed Nova for the "direct ascent" mission profile, in which a single large spacecraft would be placed in Earth orbit, and after transferring to a lunar orbit, would land directly on the Moon and take off without the need for rendezvous and docking with multiple spacecraft, which was as yet untried and perceived to be difficult. This greatly increased the liftoff mass of the space vehicle.

Von Braun favored a profile that built up the spacecraft in Earth orbit, which reduced the launch mass needed for any one launch. However, as studies into the spacecraft needed for the mission started, it became clear that the systems would be much heavier than initially suspected; the existing Nova designs were too small, and the original Saturn design would need up to fifteen launches to put all the parts and fuel into orbit. A redesign of both plans followed.

File:Saturn C-3 and Nova, 1961.jpg
Saturn C-3 and Nova designs (1961)

Nova was still targeting the direct ascent approach, which required the most lift capacity. The most powerful of the resulting "normal" designs, the 8L, included eight F-1's in the lower stage and placed 68 tons in a translunar trajectory.<ref name=":0">Template:Cite web</ref> Other designs in the series replaced the F-1s with large solids.<ref name=":1">Template:Cite web</ref><ref name=":2">Template:Cite web</ref><ref name=":3">Template:Cite web</ref><ref name=":4">Template:Cite web</ref>

File:Saturn C-3, Nova, Solid Stages, 1961.jpg
Solid stage Saturn C-3 and Nova designs (1961)

General Dynamics proposed nuclear rocket engines for the upper stages.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Lunar payload for the various models varied between 48 and 75 tons.

NASA Nova designs, circa 1960
Design Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Lunar trajectory payload (kg)
Nova 4S<ref name=":2" /> 4× 240-inch Solid-propellant M-1 J-2 - 75,300
Nova 4L<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> F-1 1× F-1 4× LH2-80k 1× LH2-80k 24,000
Nova 5S<ref name=":3" /> 6× 200-inch Solid-propellant 4× 200-inch solid motor 6× J-2 2× J-2 59,000
Nova 7S<ref name=":4" /> 7× 160-inch Solid-propellant 2× M-1 1× J-2 - 75,300
Nova 8L<ref name=":0" /> 8× F-1 2× M-1 1× J-2 - 68,000
Nova 8L Mod<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 2× F-1 2× F-1 4× J-2 - 50,000
Nova 9L<ref name=":1" /> 9× F-1 4× F-1 6× J-2 2× J-2 59,000
File:Saturn Nova structure 1961.png
Nova design (1961)

A number of upgraded Saturns were also studied. Dr. von Braun's original Saturn design became the A-1 model, while the A-2 replaced the Titan missile with a Jupiter. The more powerful B-1 model used a cluster of Titans for its second stage, but was otherwise similar to the A-1. More "radical" proposals, those requiring new engines, were lumped together in the "C series". C-1 was similar to the A-1, but used new upper stages derived from Titan engines, while the similar C-2 used new J-2 powered upper stages. C-3 through C-5 used the same J-2 powered uppers, but added a new first stage powered by three, four, or five F-1 engines (hence the names). Dr. von Braun's favored approach remained Earth Orbit Rendezvous (EOR), but this time based on two Saturn C-3's.

The debate between the various approaches came to a head in 1961, and the outcome was unexpected by both teams. Instead of either the direct ascent or Earth orbit rendezvous, the working group instead selected a third option, Lunar Orbit Rendezvous (LOR). LOR had a mass requirement about midway between the Saturn C-3 and Nova 8L. After studying what would be required to modify either booster to the new requirement of about Template:Convert in low Earth orbit (LEO), it seemed that the Saturn C-5 would be the best solution. The C-2 model would also be built as a testbed system, launching subassemblies into orbit for flight testing before the C-5 would be ready. The main determinant in selecting the Saturn over the Nova was that the Saturn C-5 could be built in an existing factory outside New Orleans, later known as the Michoud Assembly Facility, while the larger diameter Nova would need new factories to be built.Template:Citation needed

Studies on the Nova series continued into 1962 as a backup for Saturn, but were eventually ended as the Saturn-based LOR profile became ingrained.Template:Citation needed

Mars rockets

As the Apollo program continued, NASA designers started looking at their needs for the post-Apollo era, and it appeared that a human mission to Mars would be the next "obvious" step. For this role the Saturn V was far too small, and a second series of Nova design studies started for launchers of up to Template:Convert planned for 1977<ref>Template:Cite web.</ref> delivered to LEO. Unlike the original Nova series which was designed by NASA, the new designs were studied under contract by the major aerospace companies that did not receive major Apollo-related contracts, namely General Dynamics and Martin Marietta. Philip Bono at Douglas Aircraft decided to send in his own unsolicited proposals as well.

All of the companies submitted a wide variety of designs. Many of these were based on existing technology, suitably enlarged. For instance, Martin's smallest design, the 1B, used fourteen F-1s in the first stage and had a LEO payload of Template:Convert.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> They also suggested a number of "advanced" designs using the latest (undeveloped) technology, notably aerospike engines. The Nova C8 concept was nearly identical to the proposed "Saturn C-8"; there were differences in staging engines and in the stage-1 fin/flaring arrangement.

Post-Apollo Nova designs, circa 1963
Design Stage 1 Stage 2 LEO payload (kg) Operational date
Nova MM 1B<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 14× F-1A 2× M-1 330000 December 1972
Nova MM 1C<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 18× F-1A 3× M-1 444000 February 1973
Nova MM S10E-1<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 24× CD module 588000 October 1977
Nova MM S10E-2<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 30× CD module - 581000 November 1977
Nova MM S10R-2<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 30× CD module - 381925 July 1978
Nova MM S10R-1<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 24× CD module - 414000 June 1978
Nova MM R10E-2<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 30× CD module - 596000 October 1980
Nova MM R10R-2<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 30× CD module - 423000 October 1980
Nova MM T10EE-1<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 18× CD module 2× CD module 462000 November 1976
Nova MM T10RE-1<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 18× CD module 2× CD module 427000 November 1976
Nova MM T10RR-2<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 24× CD module Toroid FD 479000 December 1976
Nova MM T10RR-3<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 18× CD module 2× CD module 419000 July 1977
Nova MM 14A<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 4× 300-inch solid propellant 5× M-1 481000 April 1973
Nova MM 14B<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 4× 280-inch solid propellant 4× M-1 373000 February 1973
Nova MM 24G<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 18× HP-1 2× HP-1 447000 December 1974
Nova MM 33<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 24× HP-1 - 472000 April 1975
Nova MM 34<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 4× L6H 1× L6H 531000 June 1976
Nova GD-B<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 16× F-1A 5× J-2 338000
Nova GD-E<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 4× 325-inch solid 4× M-1 458000
Nova GD-F<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 4× L-7.70 2× M-1 454000
Nova GD-H<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 4× L-5.25H 1× L-5.00H 454000
Nova DG-J<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> 4× L-6.55 2× M-1 454000

Soon after the proposals were submitted, it became clear that post-Apollo funding would be considerably less. NASA abandoned its Nova plans in 1964.Template:Citation needed

Specifications for Nova C8

Major Nova specifications include:Template:Citation needed

  First stage Second stage Third stage
Length 48.8 m 42.7 m 17.8 m
Diameter 12.2 m 10.1 m 6.6 m
Full mass 3,600,000 kg (8,000,000 lb) 771,000 kg (1,700,000 lb) 120,000 kg (264,500 lb)
Empty mass 181,400 kg (400,000 lb) 63,500 kg (140,000 lb) 13,310 kg (29,350 lb)
Number of engines 8 x F-1 8 x J-2 1 x J-2
Thrust <vac> 61,925 kN (13,920,000 lbf) 8,265 kN (1,860,000 lbf) 1,032 kN (232,000 lbf)
ISP 304 s (2.98 kN·s/kg) 425 s (4.17 kN·s/kg) 425 s (4.17 kN·s/kg)
Burn time 157 s 338 s 473 s
Propellants Lox/Kerosene Lox/LH2 Lox/LH2

See also

References

Template:Reflist