Participatory democracy
Template:Short description Template:Synthesis Template:Lead too short Template:Use dmy dates Template:Democracy Participatory democracy, participant democracy, participative democracy, or semi-direct democracy is a form of government in which citizens participate individually and directly in political decisions and policies that affect their lives, rather than through elected representatives.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Elements of direct and representative democracy are combined in this model.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Overview
Participatory democracy is a type of democracy, which is itself a form of government. The term "democracy" is derived from the Template:Langx from δῆμος/dēmos 'people' and κράτος/kratos 'rule'.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> It has two main subtypes, direct and representative democracy. In the former, the people have the authority to deliberate and decide legislation; in the latter, they choose governing officials to do so. While direct democracy was the original concept, its representative version is the most widespread today.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Public participation, in this context, is the inclusion of the public in the activities of a polity. It can be any process that directly engages the public in decision-making and gives consideration to its input.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> The extent to which political participation should be considered necessary or appropriate is under debate in political philosophy.<ref name=":2" />
Joining political parties allows citizens to participate in democratic systems, but is not considered participatory democracy.
Participatory democracy is primarily concerned with ensuring that citizens have the opportunity to be involved in decision-making on matters that affect their lives.<ref name=":2">De Vos et al (2014) South African Constitutional Law – In Context: Oxford University Press</ref> It is not a new concept and has existed in various forms since the Athenian democracy. Its modern theory was developed by Jean-Jacques Rousseau in the 18th century and later promoted by John Stuart Mill and G. D. H. Cole, who argued that political participation is indispensable for a just society.<ref name=":33">Template:Cite journal</ref> In the early 21st century, participatory democracy has been more widely studied and experimented with, leading to various institutional reform ideas such as participatory budgeting.<ref name=":42">Template:Cite journal</ref>
History
Origins
Template:See also Democratic processes have been practiced throughout history.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Probably the earliest well-documented example of large-scale democracy comes from the city-state of Athens during classical antiquity.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="Raaflaub 2007">Template:Cite book</ref> It was first established under Cleisthenes in 508–507 BC.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> This was a direct democracy, in which ordinary citizens were randomly selected to fill government administrative and judicial offices, and there was a legislative assembly consisting of all Athenian citizens.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Athenian citizens controlled the entire political process through the assembly, the boule and the courts, and a large proportion of citizens were involved constantly in public matters.<ref name="Raaflaub 2007" /> However, Athenian citizenship excluded women, slaves, foreigners (μέτοικοι/métoikoi) and youths below the age of military service.<ref>Template:Citation</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
During the 20th century
During the 20th century, practical implementations began to take place, mostly on a small scale, attracting considerable academic attention in the 1980s. Experiments in participatory democracy took place in various cities around the world. For example, Porto Alegre, Brazil adapted a system of participatory budgeting in 1989. A World Bank study found that participatory democracy in these cities seemed to result in considerable improvement in the quality of life for residents.<ref name="Wagle & Shah 2003">Template:Harvnb</ref>
In the 21st century
In the early 21st century, experiments in participatory democracy began to spread throughout South and North America, China, and across the European Union.<ref>Template:Harvnb</ref> In a US example, the plans to rebuild New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina in 2005 were drafted and approved by thousands of ordinary citizens.<ref name="Ross 2011 loc= Chapter 4">Template:Harvnb</ref>
The Citizens' Assembly (2011) in Ireland
In 2011, as a response to citizens' growing distrust in the government following the 2008 financial crisis, Ireland authorised a citizens' assembly called "We the Citizens". Its task was to pilot the use of a participatory democratic body and test whether it could increase political legitimacy. There was an increase in both efficacy and interest in governmental functions, as well as significant opinion shifts on contested issues like taxation.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
The Citizens Convention for Climate in France (2019)
The French government organised "le grand débat national" (the Great National Debate) in early 2019 as a response to the Yellow vests movement. It consisted of 18 regional conventions, each with 100 randomly selected citizens, that had to deliberate on issues they valued the most so that they could influence government action.<ref name=":4">Template:Cite journal</ref> After the debate, a citizens' convention was created specifically to discuss climate change, "la Convention citoyenne pour le climat" (the Citizens Convention for Climate, CCC), designed to serve as a legislative body to decide how the country could reduce its greenhouse gas emissions with social justice in mind.<ref name=":1">Template:Cite web</ref> It consisted of 150 citizens selected by sortition and stratified sampling, who were sorted into five sub-groups to discuss individual topics. The members were helped by experts on steering committees. The proceedings of the CCC garnered international attention. After nine months, the convention outlined 149 measures in a 460-page report, and President Macron committed to supporting 146 of them. A bill containing these was submitted to the parliament in late 2020.<ref name=":4" />
Effects of social media
In recent years, social media has led to changes in the conduct of participatory democracy. Citizens with differing points of view are able to join conversations, mainly through the use of hashtags.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> To promote public interest and involvement, local governments have started using social media to make decisions based on public feedback.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Users have also organised online committees to highlight local needs and appoint budget delegates who work with the citizens and city agencies.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
The Occupy movement
Participatory democracy was a notable feature of the Occupy movement in 2011. "Occupy camps" around the world made decisions based on the outcome of working groups where every protester had a say. These decisions were then aggregated by general assemblies. This process combined equality, mass participation, and deliberation.<ref name="NYtimes">Template:Cite web</ref>
Evaluation
Strengths
The most prominent argument for participatory democracy is its function of greater democratization. Template:Blockquote With participatory democracy, individuals or groups can realistically achieve their interests, "[providing] the means to a more just and rewarding society, not a strategy for preserving the status quo."<ref name=":33" />
Participatory democracy may also have an educational effect. Greater political participation can help increase its efficacy and depth: "the more individuals participate the better able they become to do so",<ref name=":33" /> an idea already promoted by Rousseau, Mill, and Cole.<ref name=":42" /> Pateman emphasises this potential as it counteracts the widespread lack of faith in the capacity and capability of citizens to meaningfully participate, especially in societies with complex organisations.<ref name=":42" /> Joel D. Wolfe asserts his confidence that such models could be implemented even in large organizations, progressively diminishing state intervention.<ref name=":33" />
Criticism
Criticisms of participatory democracy can overlap with criticism of democracy.Template:Citation needed
Lack of efficacy
Some reject the feasibility of participatory models due to disbelief in citizens' capabilities to bear the greater responsibility. Critics conclude that the citizenry is disinterested and leader-dependent, making the mechanism for participatory democracy inherently incompatible with advanced societies.<ref>A Defense of Participatory Democracy, Joel D. Wolfe, The Review of Politics 47 (3): 370–389.</ref> Jason Brennan advocates in book Against Democracy for a less participatory system because of the irrationality of voters in a representative democracy. He proposes several mechanisms to reduce participation, presented with the assumption that a vote-based system of electoral representation is maintained.<ref name=":03">Template:Cite book</ref> Brennan proposes a system in which all citizens have equal rights to vote or otherwise participate in government, but decisions made by the elected representatives are scrutinized by an epistocratic council. This council could not make law, only "unmake" it, and would likely be composed of individuals who pass rigorous competency exams.<ref name=":03" />
Other concerns are whether participatory democracy can be managed and turned into effective output. David PlotkeTemplate:Who highlights that the institutional adjustments needed to make greater political participation possible would require a representative element. Consequently, both direct and participatory democracy must rely on some type of representation to sustain a stable system. He also states that achieving equal direct participation in large and heavily populated regions is hardly possible, and ultimately argues in favor of representation over participation, calling for a hybrid between participatory and representative models.<ref name=":12">Template:Cite journal</ref>
Lack of representativeness
Some forms or participatory democracy can violate the hard-won concept of political egalitarianism (One Man, One Vote).<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Town meetings can have low turnout and an over-representation of seniors.<ref name="Robinson">Template:Cite book</ref>
In case of citizens' assemblies and sortition, Roslyn Fuller criticizes that the small chance of being randomly selected to participate results in lack of representation or participation for most citizens.<ref name=":38">Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Fuller criticizes that deliberative democracy generally limits decisions to small, externally controllable groups while ignoring the plethora of e-democracy tools available which allow for unfiltered mass participation and deliberation while maintaining political representativeness.<ref name=":38"/><ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Mechanisms of participatory democracy
Scholars have recently proposed several mechanisms to increase citizen participation in democratic systems. These methods intend to increase the agenda-setting and decision-making powers of the people by giving citizens more direct ways to contribute to politics.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Citizens' assemblies
Template:See also Also called mini-publics, citizens' assemblies are representative samples of a population that meet to create legislation or advise legislative bodies. When citizens are chosen to participate by stratified sampling, the assemblies are more representative of the population than elected legislatures.<ref name=":43">Template:Citation</ref> Assemblies chosen by sortition provide average citizens with the opportunity to exercise substantive agenda-setting and/or decision-making power. Over the course of the assembly, citizens are helped by experts and discussion facilitators, and the results are either put to a referendum or sent in a report to the government.
In studying the perceived legitimacy of citizens' assemblies, political scientist Daan Jacobs finds that the perceived legitimacy of assemblies is higher than that of system with no participation, but not any higher than that of any system involving self-selection.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Regardless, the use of citizens' assemblies has grown throughout the early 21st century and they have often been used in constitutional reforms, such as in British Columbia's Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform in 2004 and the Irish Constitutional Convention in 2012.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Deliberative opinion polls
Trademarked by Stanford professor James S. Fishkin, deliberative opinion polls allow citizens to develop informed opinions before voting through deliberation. Deliberative polling begins with surveying a random representative sample of citizens to gauge their opinion.<ref name=":05">Template:Cite web</ref> The same individuals are then invited to deliberate for a weekend in the presence of political leaders, experts, and moderators. At the end, the group is surveyed again, and the final opinions are taken to be the conclusion the public would have reached if they had the opportunity to engage with the issue more deeply.<ref name=":05" /> Philosopher Cristina Lafont, a critic of deliberative opinion polling, argues that the "filtered" (informed) opinion reached at the end of a poll is too far removed from the opinion of the citizenry, delegitimizing the actions based on them.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
Public consultation surveys
Public consultation surveys are surveys on policy proposals or positions that have been put forward by legislators, government officials, or other policy leaders. The entirety of the deliberative process takes place within the survey. For each issue, respondents are provided relevant briefing materials and arguments for and against various proposals. Respondents then provide their final recommendation. Public consultation surveys are primarily done with large representative samples, usually several thousand nationally and several hundred in subnational jurisdictions.
Public consultation surveys have been used since the 1990s in the US. The American Talks Issue Foundation led by Alan Kay played a pioneering role.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> The largest such program is the Program for Public Consultation at the University of Maryland's School of Public Policy, directed by Steven Kull, conducting public consultation surveys on the national level, as well as in states and congressional districts. They have gathered public opinion data on over 300 policy proposals that have been put forward by Members of Congress and the Executive Branch, in a variety of areas.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Such surveys conducted in particular Congressional districts have also been used as the basis for face-to-face forums in congressional districts, in which survey participants and House Congressional Representative discuss the policy proposals and the results of the survey.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
The questionnaires used in the surveys by the Program for Public Consultation, which they call “policymaking simulations”, have also been made available for public use, as educational and advocacy tools.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Members of the public can take the policymaking simulations to better understand the proposal, and are given the option to send their policy recommendations to their elected officials in Congress.
E-democracy
E-democracy is an umbrella term describing a variety of proposals to increase participation through technology.<ref name=":6">Template:Cite book</ref> Open discussion forums provide citizens the opportunity to debate policy online while facilitators guide discussion. These forums usually serve agenda-setting purposes or are sometimes used to provide legislators with additional testimony. Closed forums may be used to discuss more sensitive information: in the United Kingdom, one was used to enable domestic violence survivors to testify to the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Domestic Violence and Abuse while preserving their anonymity.
Another e-democratic mechanism is online deliberative polling, a system in which citizens deliberate with peers virtually before answering a poll. The results of deliberative opinion polls are more likely to reflect the considered judgments of the people and encourage increased citizen awareness of civic issues.<ref name=":6" />
Liquid democracy
In a hybrid between direct and representative democracy, liquid democracy permits individuals to either vote on issues themselves or to select issue-competent delegates to vote on their behalf.<ref name="onlinelibrary.wiley.com">Template:Cite journal</ref> Political scientists Christian Blum and Christina Isabel Zuber suggest that liquid democracy has the potential to improve a legislature's performance through bringing together delegates with a greater awareness on a specific issue, taking advantage of knowledge within the population. To make liquid democracy more deliberative, a trustee model of delegation may be implemented, in which the delegates vote after deliberation with other representatives.
Some concerns have been raised about the implementation of liquid democracy. Blum and Zuber, for example, find that it produces two classes of voters: individuals with one vote and delegates with two or more.<ref name="onlinelibrary.wiley.com" /> They also worry that policies produced in issue-specific legislatures will lack cohesiveness. Liquid democracy is utilized by Pirate Parties for intra-party decision-making.
Referendums
Template:See also In binding referendums, citizens vote on laws and/or constitutional amendments proposed by a legislative body.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Referendums afford citizens greater decision-making power by giving them the ultimate decision, and they may also use referendums for agenda-setting if they are allowed to draft proposals to be put to referendums in efforts called popular initiatives. Compulsory voting can further increase participation. Political theorist Hélène Landemore raises the concern that referendums may fail to be sufficiently deliberative as people are unable to engage in discussions and debates that would enhance their decision-making abilities.<ref name=":43"/>
Switzerland currently uses a rigorous system of referendums, under which all laws the legislature proposes go to referendums. Swiss citizens may also start popular initiatives, a process in which citizens put forward a constitutional amendment or propose the removal of an existing provision. Any proposal must receive the signature of 100,000 citizens to go to a ballot.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Town meetings
In local participatory democracy, town meetings provide all residents with legislative power.<ref name=":52" /> Practiced in the United States, particularly in New England, since the 17th century, they assure that local policy decisions are made directly by the public. Local democracy is often seen as the first step towards a participatory system.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Theorist Graham Smith, however, notes the limited impact of town meetings that cannot lead to action on national issues. He also suggests that town meetings are not representative as they disproportionately represent individuals with free time, including the elderly and the affluent.
Participatory budgeting
Participatory budgeting allows citizens to make decisions on the allocation of a public budget.<ref name=":52">Template:Citation</ref> Originating in Porto Alegre, Brazil, the general procedure involves the creation of a concrete financial plan that then serves as a recommendation to elected representatives. Neighbourhoods are given the authority to design budgets for the greater region and local proposals are brought to elected regional forums. This system lead to a decrease in clientelism and corruption and an increase in participation, particularly amongst marginalized and poorer residents. Theorist Graham Smith observes that participatory budgeting still has some barriers to entry for the poorest members of the population.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
See also
- Civic intelligence
- Collaborative governance
- Deliberative democracy
- Demarchy
- Green politics
- Inclusive Democracy
- Open source governance
- Participatory action research
- Participatory culture
- Participatory justice
- Public incubator
- Public participation
- Public sphere
- Radical democracy
- Radical transparency
- Sociocracy
- Workers' council