Rosa Luxemburg

From Vero - Wikipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Otheruses Template:Use dmy dates Template:Infobox person Template:Marxism sidebar

Rosa Luxemburg (Template:IPAc-en Template:Respell;<ref>Template:Cite Dictionary.com</ref> Template:Langx Template:IPA; Template:IPA; 5 March 1871 – 15 January 1919) was a Polish and naturalised-German Marxist theorist and revolutionary. She was a leading theorist of the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) and later co-founded the anti-war Spartacus League, which evolved into the Communist Party of Germany (KPD). An influential member of the international socialist movement, she is remembered for her writings on imperialism and revolution, and as a champion of socialist democracy who famously stated, "Freedom is always and exclusively freedom for the one who thinks differently."

Born and raised in Russian-ruled Poland to a secular Jewish family, Luxemburg became active in revolutionary politics in her youth. She co-founded the Social Democracy of the Kingdom of Poland and Lithuania (SDKPiL), a party that rejected Polish nationalism in favour of an international class struggle. After moving to Germany in 1898, she became the foremost voice of the SPD's revolutionary wing. In her 1900 pamphlet Social Reform or Revolution?, she defended the necessity of revolution against the reformist theories of Eduard Bernstein, arguing that the struggle for reforms was a means to an end, not an end in itself. Inspired by the 1905 Russian Revolution, she developed a theory of the mass strike as the proletariat's most important revolutionary tool, emphasizing the spontaneous creativity of the working class.

As World War I approached, Luxemburg's anti-militarist and anti-imperialist convictions brought her into increasing conflict with the SPD leadership. In her major work, The Accumulation of Capital (1913), she argued that capitalism's need to expand into non-capitalist regions to survive was the driving force behind imperialism. She fiercely condemned the party's support for the war, and was imprisoned for most of the conflict. From prison, she wrote the influential Junius Pamphlet, which declared the war a betrayal of the working class and popularized the phrase "socialism or barbarism" to describe the choice facing humanity. While she celebrated the Russian Revolution of 1917, in a posthumously published manuscript she offered a sharp critique of the Bolsheviks' authoritarian policies, defending democratic freedoms and the need for a revolution rooted in mass participation. Her writings on the Russian Revolution were later viewed by some as a prescient critique of Stalinism.

Released from prison during the German Revolution of 1918–1919, Luxemburg co-founded the KPD and became a central figure in the January 1919 Spartacist uprising in Berlin. After the uprising was crushed by the Freikorps, a government-sponsored paramilitary group, Luxemburg and her comrade Karl Liebknecht were captured and summarily executed. Following her death, Luxemburg became a heroine and martyr for Marxists. Her legacy has been a subject of intense debate, with her emphasis on spontaneity and democracy celebrated by many on the left—particularly by the New Left and those in the libertarian socialist tradition—but sharply criticized by the Stalinist tradition, which denounced "Luxemburgism" as a heresy.

Early life (1871–1890)

Rozalia Luksenburg was born on 5 March 1871 in Zamość, a town in the Russian-controlled Congress Poland.Template:Sfnm She was the fifth and youngest child of a moderately well-off, assimilated, secular Jewish family.Template:Sfnm Her father, Elias (or Eduard) Luxemburg, was a timber merchant with a German education who was sympathetic to the Polish national movement.Template:Sfnm Her mother, Lina Löwenstein, was descended from a long line of rabbis.Template:Sfn The family was committed to the values of the Haskalah, the Jewish enlightenment movement, and embraced progressive European culture.Template:Sfnm The family had largely abandoned a conscious Jewish life; they spoke Polish and German at home, and Rosa, like her four siblings, received a secular education.Template:Sfnm She had a complex relationship with her Jewish identity; while proud of her heritage, she rejected any specific Jewish political cause, insisting that the suffering of Jews was no worse than the often murderous oppression of other peoples by European imperialism.Template:Sfnm She stated later in life: "I have no special corner of my heart for the [Jewish] ghetto. I feel at home in the entire world wherever there are clouds and birds and human tears."Template:Sfnm As such, the Jewish socialist Bund held no attraction for her, and her concerns consistently transcended nationality.Template:Sfn

In 1873, the family moved to Warsaw to seek better business opportunities, a better education for their children, and to escape the ever-present anti-Jewish sentiment and Orthodox-Hasidic dominance in Zamość.Template:Sfnm At age five, Luxemburg developed a hip disease, probably a congenital hip dislocation. It was misdiagnosed as tuberculosis and resulted in a year-long confinement in a cast, during which she taught herself to read and write.Template:Sfn The illness left her with a permanent limp, a condition that deeply affected her and which she later blamed her parents for not detecting earlier.Template:Sfnm

Luxemburg at about age 12, Template:Circa

In 1880, she enrolled at the Second Girls' High School in Warsaw.Template:Sfn Admission for Jewish students was subject to a quota, a humiliation which intensified her sense of being an outsider.Template:Sfn The school was an instrument of Russification, forbidding the use of Polish.Template:Sfn The 1881 Warsaw pogrom, which her family experienced, left her with a permanent fear of mob violence.Template:Sfn In response to this frightening reality, she found refuge in the poetry of the Polish Romantic Adam Mickiewicz, whose appeal to rebellion and dreams of universal freedom became a source of inspiration.Template:Sfn During this time, while still in her teens, Luxemburg became involved in clandestine student circles associated with the revolutionary Proletariat party.Template:Sfnm This was the first Polish socialist party, founded in 1882 by Ludwik Waryński.Template:Sfn The party was internationalist in outlook, prioritising the economic struggle of the working class and opposing "romantic" ideas such as national liberation, which it believed would deflect or compromise class consciousness.Template:Sfnm By her final year, Luxemburg was known to the authorities as a politically active and rebellious student, and she was denied the gold medal for academic achievement which her scholastic merits had earned.Template:Sfn

After graduating in 1887, she continued her revolutionary activities.Template:Sfn She was part of a cell of the "Second Proletariat", one of the successor groups to the original party which had been broken up by arrests in the mid-1880s.Template:Sfnm By 1889, threatened with arrest, she was smuggled out of Poland with the help of her mentor, Marcin Kasprzak.Template:Sfn According to one account, she was hidden under straw in a peasant's cart and taken across the border by a Catholic priest who had been told she was a Jewish girl fleeing to be baptized.Template:Sfnm

Zurich and early political career (1890–1898)

Luxemburg arrived in Zurich in early 1889.Template:Sfn At the time, Switzerland was the most important centre of Russian and Polish revolutionary Marxism in exile.Template:Sfn In 1890, she enrolled at the University of Zurich, where women were admitted on an equal footing with men.Template:Sfn She initially studied natural sciences and mathematics, but in 1892 she switched to the faculty of law, where she studied public law and political economy under Professor Julius Wolf.Template:Sfnm Wolf later acknowledged that "she came to me from Poland already as a thorough Marxist".Template:Sfn

Leo Jogiches Template:Circa 1890

In early autumn 1890, she met Leo Jogiches, a famous revolutionary from Vilna who had also recently escaped from the Russian Empire.Template:Sfnm They fell in love and by the summer of 1891 had become lovers, beginning a tumultuous fifteen-year relationship that she considered a marriage, referring to him in her letters as her husband.Template:Sfnm Jogiches became the most dominant figure in her personal and political life. Their relationship was a complex fusion of personal intimacy and political collaboration, marked by both deep affection and intense intellectual conflict.Template:Sfnm Jogiches provided the financial support for their activities, while Luxemburg became the partnership's public voice and theorist.Template:Sfn He insisted on absolute secrecy about their relationship, which Luxemburg alternately rebelled against and accepted.Template:Sfn

Soon after their arrival, Jogiches and Luxemburg came into conflict with the established leadership of Russian Marxism, centred around Georgi Plekhanov in Geneva. Jogiches, with his characteristic self-assurance, proposed a publishing partnership with Plekhanov on equal terms and was promptly rejected.Template:Sfn The ensuing quarrel isolated them from the main Russian socialist movement and pushed their activities increasingly towards Polish affairs.Template:Sfn They began to gather a small group of Polish students and exiles around them, including Julian Marchlewski and Adolf Warszawski.Template:Sfn In 1893, this group founded a new party, the Social Democracy of the Kingdom of Poland (SDKP), in opposition to the recently unified Polish Socialist Party (PPS).Template:Sfnm The SDKP's programme, largely formulated by Luxemburg, rejected the PPS's central demand for Polish independence. Instead, it argued for close collaboration with Russian socialists to achieve a revolution in the Russian Empire, within which Poland would have territorial autonomy.Template:Sfnm

Luxemburg, Template:Circa 1893

At the Second International's third congress in Zurich in 1893, Luxemburg, as a delegate for the SDKP's newspaper Sprawa Robotnicza (The Workers' Cause), had her mandate challenged by the PPS delegation.Template:Sfn Small and frail, she climbed onto a chair to make herself heard and, with "magnetism in her eyes and in such fiery words", defended her cause.Template:Sfnm Although the congress ultimately voted to reject her mandate, she achieved a moral victory by framing the dispute as one of principle rather than personal rivalry.Template:Sfn This conflict over the "national question" became the central and most enduring division in Polish socialism. The polemics between the two parties forced both to sharpen their positions: the PPS became more openly nationalist, while the SDKP's opposition to Polish independence became a core doctrine.Template:Sfn At the next congress in London in 1896, the International passed a compromise resolution supporting the right of all nations to self-determination but without specific mention of Poland.Template:Sfn

In 1897, Luxemburg successfully defended her doctoral dissertation in economics, Die industrielle Entwicklung Polens (The Industrial Development of Poland), which argued that the industrial growth of Russian Poland was inextricably linked to the Russian market, a connection driven by the Russian government's own policies.Template:Sfnm For Luxemburg, this "objective economic trend" meant that Polish independence was an economic and political negation of progress, a self-defeating strategy for the Polish working class that would slow its development.Template:Sfnm She was one of the first women in the world, and the first Polish woman, to be awarded a doctorate in political economy.<ref name="tych2">Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="winkler">Template:Cite web</ref>Template:Sfn To obtain German citizenship and the ability to work within the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD), she entered into a marriage of convenience with Gustav Lübeck, son of her Zurich friend Olympia Lübeck, in April 1898.Template:Sfnm On 12 May 1898, she moved to Berlin.Template:Sfnm

Activism in the SPD (1898–1905)

Luxemburg Template:Circa 1900

Luxemburg arrived in Germany at a pivotal moment for the SPD. After years of operating under the Anti-Socialist Laws, the party had grown into a massive but politically isolated organisation. Its official doctrine, codified in the 1891 Erfurt Program, combined a Marxist prediction of capitalism's inevitable collapse with a practical focus on immediate, minimal reforms.Template:Sfnm This inherent contradiction was brought to the fore by the revisionist controversy, which began in earnest in 1898.Template:Sfn Eduard Bernstein, a respected party veteran living in London, published a series of articles arguing that many of Marx's predictions were outdated. He proposed that the party should abandon its revolutionary goals and "dare to appear as what it actually was: a democratic Socialist party of reform".Template:Sfnm

Title page of Luxemburg's Social Reform or Revolution? (1899)

Luxemburg immediately plunged into the debate, seeing it as a crucial opportunity to establish her career and defend what she saw as the core of Marxism.Template:Sfnm As a Polish-Jewish woman, she faced considerable resentment from many party leaders.Template:Sfn She became a leading voice of the party's revolutionary left, along with Alexander Parvus.Template:Sfn Her most significant contribution was the pamphlet Social Reform or Revolution?, first published as a series of articles in the Leipziger Volkszeitung in late 1898 and early 1899.Template:Sfnm

In it, she argued that Bernstein's reformist path would "paralyze completely the proletarian class struggle", resulting not in socialism but only the reform of capitalism.Template:Sfnm The daily struggle for reforms, she contended, was the only way for the proletariat to develop the class consciousness necessary for the revolutionary seizure of power, a process it would learn not through its successes but through its failures.Template:Sfnm As she explained, "Between social reforms and revolution there exists for the Social Democracy an indissoluble tie. The struggle for reforms is its means; the social revolution, its aim."Template:Sfnm To abandon the final goal of revolution would be to sever practice from theory, transforming the socialist movement into a mere reformist, petit-bourgeois party.Template:Sfnm She dismantled Bernstein's economic arguments, reasserting the Marxist theses of capitalist crisis and collapse.Template:Sfn The pamphlet established her reputation as a major theorist and the "hammer of revisionism".Template:Sfn In this early period, however, her method for connecting the party's minimum and maximum goals remained somewhat abstract; having established that the struggle for reforms could not by itself lead to socialism, she insisted that it must nonetheless express the socialist goal through a subjective act of will, without yet outlining a concrete strategy for doing so.Template:Sfn

At the party congresses of 1898, 1899, and 1901, Luxemburg was a prominent speaker, crossing swords not only with revisionists but also with the party leadership, which she often saw as too accommodating.Template:Sfn She defended socialists' involvement in the Dreyfus affair in France, but sharply condemned the "rotten compromise" of French socialist Alexandre Millerand entering a bourgeois government.Template:Sfn She formed a close intellectual and personal alliance with Karl Kautsky, the party's leading theorist, and his wife Luise.Template:Sfnm Together with Kautsky, she led the "orthodox" Marxist camp against Bernstein, though her approach was always more radical and action-oriented than Kautsky's more academic defence of principles.Template:Sfn By 1903, the revisionist challenge had been officially defeated within the party, and the orthodox line was resoundingly confirmed at the 1904 Amsterdam congress of the Second International.Template:Sfnm

Throughout this period, Luxemburg led a dual political life, maintaining her central role in the SDKP while becoming a major figure in the SPD.Template:Sfn She deliberately kept her German and Polish activities separate, a division facilitated by Jogiches's insistence on conspiratorial methods.Template:Sfn From her base in Berlin, she directed much of the SDKP's strategy, particularly its unrelenting campaign against the PPS in Germany and in the International.Template:Sfn In 1899, the SDKP merged with a group of Lithuanian social democrats led by Felix Dzerzhinsky, becoming the Social Democracy of the Kingdom of Poland and Lithuania (SDKPiL).Template:Sfnm Her influence and the support of the SPD leadership were instrumental in establishing the SDKPiL as a recognised, albeit small, force in international socialism.Template:Sfn Luxemburg remained sentimental towards Polish culture, with Mickiewicz as her favourite poet. In 1893, she wrote against the Russification of Poles by the Russian Empire,<ref name="sprawaPL">Template:Cite journal</ref> and in 1900 published a brochure against the Germanisation of Poles in Poznań.<ref name="tych5">Template:Cite book</ref>

1905 Revolution and aftermath (1905–1911)

Role in the 1905 Revolution

The 1905 Russian Revolution erupted dramatically in January and had a profound impact on Luxemburg's thought and activity.Template:Sfnm The wave of mass strikes, peasant uprisings, and military mutinies that swept across the Russian Empire, including Poland, seemed to confirm her revolutionary predictions.Template:Sfn She immediately began to analyse the events for the German and Polish socialist press.Template:Sfnm In her articles, she celebrated the mass strike as the central weapon of the revolution, a form of action that fused the economic and political struggles and spontaneously raised the class consciousness of the proletariat.Template:Sfnm She now saw the "backward" Russian working class, with its spontaneous revolutionary action, as the vanguard of the international workers' movement.Template:Sfn

Mugshot taken after Luxemburg's arrest in Warsaw, 1906

As the revolution in Poland intensified, her position in Berlin became increasingly untenable. Feeling isolated from the "real revolution", she decided to go to Warsaw.Template:Sfn Her relationship with Jogiches had entered a period of crisis, triggered in part by a brief affair she had with another revolutionary, which she confessed to Jogiches in August 1905.Template:Sfn Despite warnings from her German and Polish colleagues about the dangers, she left Berlin on 28 December 1905, travelling on false papers under the name Anna Matschke.Template:Sfnm In Warsaw, she joined Jogiches and other SDKPiL leaders, plunging into the heart of the revolutionary turmoil. She wrote prolifically for the party's newspapers, helped to formulate its programme, and participated in clandestine meetings.Template:Sfn However, her stay was short-lived. On 4 March 1906, she and Jogiches were arrested in a police raid.Template:Sfnm

Luxemburg was imprisoned for four months, first in the Town Hall jail, then in the Pawiak prison, and finally in the notorious Pavilion X of the Warsaw Citadel.Template:Sfn Her health deteriorated rapidly, but her spirits remained high. Through the combined efforts of her family and the German SPD, including a bail of 3,000 roubles paid by her brother Jozef, she was released on 28 July 1906.Template:Sfnm Forbidden to leave Warsaw, she spent the next month arranging her departure. She eventually left for Kuokkala, Finland, where she joined Vladimir Lenin and other Bolshevik leaders for several weeks of discussion about the lessons of the revolution.Template:Sfnm This experience was formative, showing her what was possible when a working class manifested its "sovereignty" and that democracy held a potential beyond the circumscribed rights of the bourgeois state, a potential that could only be realised by extending democracy from the political into the socioeconomic realm.Template:Sfn

Mass strike doctrine and SPD Party School

The experience of the 1905 revolution became the foundation for Luxemburg's most influential work on revolutionary strategy, the pamphlet The Mass Strike, the Political Party and the Trade Unions, written in Finland and published in Germany in 1906.Template:Sfnm In it, she generalized from the Russian experience, arguing that the mass strike was not a single, isolated act but a continuous process, a period of heightened class struggle in which the economic and political spheres were inseparable. It was, she argued, a spontaneous expression of the revolutionary energy of the masses, which the party could not artificially "make" but must lead and give political direction.Template:Sfnm For Luxemburg, the mass strike became the concrete strategic answer to the problem of bridging the gap between the party's minimum programme of immediate reforms and its maximum programme of social revolution.Template:Sfn Her theory contained what her biographer Norman Geras called "an embryonic concept of dual power", seeing in the direct action of the masses the germ of a new form of proletarian democracy that could overthrow the bourgeois state.Template:Sfn

The pamphlet was a direct challenge to the German trade union leadership, which saw the mass strike as a threat to their organizations and a recipe for "revolutionary romanticism".Template:Sfn From the "whirlwind and the storm" of a mass strike, she wrote, could arise "fresh, young, powerful, buoyant trade unions".Template:Sfnm At the 1906 SPD congress in Mannheim, a major confrontation occurred between the party's revolutionary wing, represented by Luxemburg, and the trade union leaders led by Carl Legien. Luxemburg passionately defended the lessons of the Russian revolution, but the congress ultimately passed a resolution that effectively gave the trade unions a veto over any future mass strike action.Template:Sfnm A similar debate took place at the 1907 International congress in Stuttgart, where an amendment drafted by Luxemburg, Lenin, and Julius Martov was attached to the main resolution on war and militarism. It committed the socialist parties not only to prevent war but also to use any war crisis to "hasten the abolition of capitalist class rule".Template:Sfnm

Luxemburg (fourth from left against bookcase) among attendees at the SPD party school in 1907

The years from 1907 to 1910 were a period of relative political quietism for Luxemburg in Germany. Following the SPD's electoral defeat in the 1907 "Hottentot elections", the party leadership became increasingly cautious and resistant to radical tactics.Template:Sfn Disillusioned with the party's direction, Luxemburg withdrew from day-to-day agitation and focused on her theoretical work and teaching.Template:Sfn In October 1907, she became a lecturer in political economy and economic history at the SPD's new Central Party School in Berlin, a post she held until 1914.Template:Sfnm The school was intended to train an elite of party and trade union functionaries. Luxemburg was an enthusiastic and highly successful teacher, known for her Socratic method of questioning students to help them develop "an airtight solution" for themselves. Her lectures formed the basis for two of her major economic works, Introduction to Political Economy and The Accumulation of Capital.Template:Sfnm

This period also marked the definitive end of Luxemburg's relationship with Jogiches. He escaped from prison in Warsaw and arrived in Berlin in April 1907, only to be told their relationship was over. His violent reaction, including threats to kill her, shocked and frightened her.Template:Sfn The personal break was a source of great pain, but according to biographer Raya Dunayevskaya, it coincided with her reaching new heights of intellectual and organizational independence.Template:Sfn Luxemburg had already begun a new relationship with Konstantin (Kostja) Zetkin, the 22-year-old son of her close friend and comrade Clara Zetkin.Template:Sfnm

Break with Kautsky

Luxemburg (near centre, wearing bow) and Karl Kautsky (back row, third from right) at the Amsterdam Congress of the Second International, 1904

The temporary truce in the SPD between the radicals and the leadership ended abruptly in 1910 over the question of Prussian suffrage. The Prussian three-class franchise was a long-standing grievance, and a new government bill that failed to introduce equal suffrage sparked a wave of mass demonstrations and strikes.Template:Sfn Luxemburg saw this as a golden opportunity to put her mass strike theory into practice and to push the party in a more revolutionary direction.Template:Sfn She embarked on an intensive speaking tour, and in a series of articles, beginning with "What Next?", she called for the party to escalate the struggle, including through republican agitation.Template:Sfnm

The party executive, however, was wary of such radical tactics, fearing they would alienate bourgeois allies and jeopardize the upcoming Reichstag elections. Kautsky, now the chief defender of the party's cautious "strategy of attrition" (Ermattungsstrategie), refused to publish her article in Die Neue Zeit, allegedly editing out her call for a mass strike.Template:Sfnm This refusal marked the beginning of a bitter and public polemic between the two former allies, which permanently destroyed their friendship and intellectual partnership.Template:Sfnm While Kautsky argued that the mass strike should only be used as a "defensive" tactic when democracy itself was threatened, Luxemburg insisted it should also be an "offensive" weapon to transform society.Template:Sfn Luxemburg accused Kautsky of cowardice and of abandoning Marxist principles for parliamentary expediency. Kautsky, in turn, portrayed her as a reckless adventurer whose "rebel's impatience" threatened to lead the party to ruin.Template:Sfnm The break was accompanied by sexist invective from party leaders like August Bebel.Template:Sfnm

The controversy effectively ended Luxemburg's influence with the SPD's centrist leadership. She was now increasingly isolated, a leader of a small but growing radical opposition within the party.Template:Sfn Although her resolution on the mass strike was defeated at the 1910 Magdeburg congress, the debate had drawn a clear line between her revolutionary strategy and the executive's policy of waiting for history to run its course.Template:Sfn The conflict intensified in 1911 during the Agadir Crisis, when she again clashed with the leadership over what she saw as their passive and inadequate response to the threat of imperialist war.Template:Sfnm

Theorist of imperialism (1911–1914)

Luxemburg in 1912

The years before the outbreak of World War I were marked by Luxemburg's growing alienation from the SPD's leadership and her development of a comprehensive theory of imperialism.Template:Sfn The party's electoral victory in 1912, which made it the largest party in the Reichstag, was followed by an electoral pact with the liberal Progressive Party in the run-off elections. When the Progressives failed to reciprocate the SPD's support, Luxemburg launched a scathing critique, arguing that "real class interests are stronger than any 'arrangements'".Template:Sfn For her, the episode demonstrated the futility of parliamentary tactics and the naive belief in alliances with bourgeois parties.Template:Sfn She became increasingly disillusioned with the parliamentary group's growing influence, which she saw as corroding the party's revolutionary spirit.Template:Sfn

This period of opposition culminated in her major theoretical work, The Accumulation of Capital, published in 1913. The book originated from her teaching at the SPD party school and her attempt to resolve a technical problem in Marx's theory of capitalist reproduction.Template:Sfnm Her central thesis was that capitalism, as a closed system, could not realise the surplus value it generated and was therefore dependent on a constant expansion into non-capitalist economies and social strata for its survival and accumulation. This "cannibalization" of pre-capitalist societies was, for Luxemburg, the economic root of imperialism.Template:Sfnm In contrast to other Marxists like Lenin, she argued that imperialism was not just the "last stage of capitalism" but had been an integral part of capitalism from its earliest beginnings.Template:Sfnm

In developing her theory, she drew upon her studies of non-Western societies in her unfinished Introduction to Political Economy, where she analysed the destructive impact of European expansion on "primitive communist" societies around the world.Template:Sfnm Her analysis notably focused on the "permanent process of coercive expropriation" that imperialism represented, highlighting its violent destruction of non-capitalist societies as an ongoing feature of capital accumulation, not just an initial phase.Template:Sfnm She displayed a notable "anthropological sensitivity", detailing the destruction of the English peasantry, Native Americans, and enslaved Africans, as well as the effects of British colonialism in India and China, and French colonialism in Algeria.Template:Sfnm She was an early and vocal opponent of German colonialism, denouncing the extermination of the Herero and Nama peoples in modern-day Namibia.Template:Sfnm Far from being detached from her political concerns, she saw her economic analysis as providing the theoretical foundation for the practical struggle against imperialism, which she believed required a revolutionary strategy rather than the hope of a more moderate, peaceful form of imperialism.Template:Sfn

The book was a monumental effort, which she later claimed to have written in an ecstatic state in just four months.Template:Sfnm Though she intended it to demonstrate the economic inevitability of capitalism's collapse, it was met with sharp criticism from many leading Marxists, including Kautsky, Lenin, Otto Bauer, and Nikolai Bukharin, who rejected her core premise.Template:Sfn The book established her reputation as a brilliant, if unorthodox, theorist and provided the intellectual foundation for her intensifying struggle against imperialism.Template:Sfnm

Luxemburg's anti-militarist agitation also brought her into direct conflict with the state. In September 1913, she gave a speech in Bockenheim, near Frankfurt, in which she called on German workers to refuse to take up arms against their "French and other brethren".Template:Sfn She was charged with inciting soldiers to mutiny and tried in February 1914. She used the trial as a platform to launch a political assault on militarism and the ruling class, turning her defence into an indictment of the society that was prosecuting her.Template:Sfnm Sentenced to a year in prison, she embarked on a whistle-stop speaking tour while her appeal was pending, drawing large and sympathetic crowds.Template:Sfn A second trial for insulting the army followed, based on her allegations of routine abuse of soldiers in the German military. The authorities, hoping to make a test case, were flooded with evidence of such maltreatment, and the trial was eventually adjourned indefinitely.Template:Sfn These trials raised Luxemburg's public profile to a height not seen since 1910 and rallied a growing opposition around the banner of anti-militarism.Template:Sfn During the trials, she began a brief but intense affair with her lawyer, Paul Levi.Template:Sfn

World War I (1914–1918)

Luxemburg in 1910

The outbreak of World War I in August 1914 and the subsequent collapse of the Second International was the defining catastrophe of Luxemburg's political life. On 4 August, the SPD's Reichstag delegation voted unanimously for war credits, a decision that signified the capitulation of European social democracy to nationalism.Template:Sfnm Luxemburg, who was in Berlin, was devastated.Template:Sfn Together with Karl Liebknecht, Clara Zetkin, Franz Mehring and a small circle of friends, she immediately began to organize an opposition.Template:Sfnm On 10 September 1914, they issued their first public declaration against the party's policy, disassociating themselves from the SPD leadership and calling for a new International.Template:Sfn This group, initially known as the Gruppe Internationale, became the nucleus of the Spartacus League (Spartakusbund).

Most of the war Luxemburg spent in prison. Her sentence from the 1914 Frankfurt trial was executed, and she was imprisoned from February 1915 to February 1916.Template:Sfnm After only a few months of freedom, during which she was a central figure in the Spartacist opposition, she was re-arrested in July 1916 and held in "protective custody" without trial, first in Warsaw and then in Breslau, until her release during the November 1918 revolution.Template:Sfn

Imprisonment and writings

Prison became a period of intense intellectual and personal activity for Luxemburg. Though cut off from direct political action, she maintained a prolific correspondence with her friends, particularly Clara Zetkin, Luise Kautsky, and Sophie Liebknecht.Template:Sfn In her letters to a new set of confidantes, including Mathilde Jacob, who acted as her link to the outside world, she revealed her vulnerability, her deep love of nature, and her profound empathy for the suffering of others.Template:Sfn While in her cell, she collected flowers and plants during her walks, studied botany, and cared for injured animals, once nursing a disabled pigeon back to health.Template:Sfn She famously wrote to Sophie Liebknecht about her encounter with abused Romanian buffaloes in the prison yard, an episode that crystallized for her the intertwined cruelty of war and the human capacity for empathy.Template:Sfn

From prison, she also continued her political work, smuggling out articles and pamphlets that became the theoretical touchstones of the Spartacus League. The most famous of these was the Junius Pamphlet (officially The Crisis of Social Democracy), written in 1915 and illegally distributed in 1916.Template:Sfnm Considered the ideological foundation of the Spartacus League,Template:Sfn it delivered a devastating analysis of the war as an imperialist conflict for which all sides were responsible and a searing indictment of the SPD's betrayal. The central idea of the pamphlet—to use the crisis of war to hasten the revolution—drew on the 1907 resolution of the Second International which Luxemburg herself had co-authored.Template:Sfn She argued that in the age of imperialism, national wars of defence were no longer possible and that the only alternative for the proletariat was international class struggle against the war, summed up in the slogan "socialism or barbarism".Template:Sfnm This phrase marked a definitive break from revolutionary fatalism by explicitly posing socialism not as an inevitability but as an objective historical possibility.Template:Sfnm This established an "open" view of history in which the outcome depended on the conscious action of the proletariat.Template:Sfn

Cover of Luxemburg's The Russian Revolution, written in 1918 and published posthumously in 1922

The Russian Revolution of 1917 was a source of both hope and profound concern for Luxemburg. She celebrated the overthrow of Tsarism but became increasingly critical of the Bolsheviks after they seized power in October. In a manuscript written in her Breslau prison in 1918 (published posthumously by Paul Levi in 1922 as The Russian Revolution), she offered a comradely but sharp critique of Bolshevik policy from a leftist perspective.Template:Sfnm The pamphlet's publication sparked an intense and ongoing debate over whether Luxemburg had changed her mind after leaving prison, with comrades like Clara Zetkin arguing that she had.Template:Sfn At stake in the controversy was not just Luxemburg's view of Lenin's actions, but the proper balance in revolutionary theory between mass "spontaneity" and the "consciousness" provided by a vanguard party.Template:Sfn

While praising Lenin and Leon Trotsky for having the courage to make a revolution, she identified three major failings in their policies: their suppression of the Constituent Assembly, their agrarian policy of distributing land to individual peasants rather than nationalizing it, and their support for the right of nations to self-determination.Template:Sfnm She condemned their resort to terror and their abolition of democratic freedoms like the freedom of the press and assembly, famously arguing that "Freedom is always and exclusively freedom for the one who thinks differently."Template:Sfnm She elaborated in a prophetic warning against the rise of a new bureaucracy: Template:Quote Her critique was motivated by her faith in the spontaneous political activity of the masses, which she believed was the unique source of revolutionary value.Template:Sfn At the same time, she explicitly defended the Bolsheviks' use of force against the counter-revolutionary bourgeoisie, writing that "socialist dictatorship... cannot shrink from any use of force to secure or prevent certain measures involving the interests of the whole."Template:Sfn For Luxemburg, the Bolsheviks' errors stemmed from the isolation of the Russian Revolution, which could only be saved by a successful proletarian revolution in Germany and the West.Template:Sfnm The Bolsheviks, she wrote, represented "all the revolutionary honor and capacity which western Social-Democracy lacked."Template:Sfnm She insisted that the best way to aid the Russian Revolution was for workers' movements in other countries to end their "terrible isolation by making revolutions in their own countries".Template:Sfnm

German Revolution and death

File:Rote-Fahne-1918.jpg
Header from Die Rote Fahne, 23 November 1918

Luxemburg was released from prison on 9 November 1918, in the midst of the German Revolution of 1918–1919. Her hair had turned white, and her health had deteriorated.Template:Sfnm She travelled immediately to Berlin and plunged into the revolutionary turmoil.Template:Sfn Together with Karl Liebknecht, she took over the leadership of the Spartacus League and began publishing its daily newspaper, Die Rote Fahne (The Red Flag).Template:Sfnm She forcefully articulated the Spartacist programme: the overthrow of the provisional government of Friedrich Ebert, the disarming of the counter-revolutionary troops, and the transfer of all power to the workers' and soldiers' councils.Template:Sfn

At the turn of the year, from 30 December 1918 to 1 January 1919, the Spartacus League, along with other radical groups, founded the Communist Party of Germany (KPD).Template:Sfnm In her programme speech to the founding congress, Luxemburg laid out her vision of revolution. She rejected both a Blanquist-style seizure of power by a minority and a purely parliamentary path to socialism. Revolution, she argued, must be the work of the masses themselves, a protracted process of class struggle from below, in which the workers would learn to wield power through their own action and experience.Template:Sfn Although she and the other leaders advised participation in the upcoming elections for a National Assembly, the congress, dominated by young and impatient radicals, voted against their advice.Template:Sfnm

Spartacist uprising and murder

In early January 1919, a second revolutionary wave swept Berlin. The dismissal of the popular but radical police chief of Berlin, Emil Eichhorn, by the Ebert government sparked a mass demonstration on 5 January, organized by the Revolutionary Shop Stewards, the left-wing of the Independent Social Democrats (USPD), and the KPD.Template:Sfnm The demonstration was far larger than expected, and a Revolutionary Committee, including Liebknecht, was hastily formed to lead the movement.Template:Sfn This so-called Spartacist uprising was not a planned putsch by the KPD. Luxemburg initially thought it a mistake, believing the moment was not yet ripe for an overthrow of the government, but once the masses were on the streets, she felt it was the duty of revolutionaries to support them.Template:Sfnm In Die Rote Fahne, she passionately urged the workers on.

File:Cpartakovtsy-2.png
Detachment of Spartacists during the Spartacist uprising, 1919

The government, led by Ebert and his defence minister Gustav Noske, moved decisively to crush the revolt. They employed the Freikorps, newly formed right-wing paramilitary units composed of demobilised soldiers and officers, to suppress the uprising.Template:Sfnm By 13 January, the fighting was largely over and the revolt crushed. The Spartacist leaders went into hiding. On the evening of 15 January, Luxemburg and Liebknecht were discovered in an apartment in the Wilmersdorf district of Berlin by the Wilmersdorfer Bürgerwehr, a citizen militia.Template:Sfn They were arrested and handed over to the Freikorps Garde-Kavallerie-Schützen-Division.Template:Sfnm They were taken to the division's headquarters at the Eden Hotel, where they were interrogated by the commander, Captain Waldemar Pabst.Template:Sfn Liebknecht was taken out first, shot, and delivered to a mortuary as an "unidentified man". Luxemburg was then led out. A soldier named Otto Runge struck her on the head with his rifle butt as she left the hotel, and she was struck a second time before being bundled into a car.Template:Sfnm There, she was shot in the head, and her body, weighted with stones, was thrown into the Landwehr Canal.Template:Sfnm Her body was not found until 31 May 1919.Template:Sfnm

The murders were ordered by Captain Pabst, who in later years claimed he had obtained tacit approval from Noske. When Pabst asked Noske for permission, Noske allegedly told him to consult with his superior, General Walther von Lüttwitz, and when Pabst replied that he would never get permission, Noske responded: "Then you will have to take responsibility for what must be done."Template:Sfn According to Pabst's later accounts, the actual shooter was naval lieutenant Hermann Souchon, who jumped onto the footboard of the car and shot Luxemburg at close range after receiving the order from Pabst.Template:Sfn The murders provoked widespread outrage. The subsequent military trial of the perpetrators was widely seen as a sham, as it was conducted by their own comrades and presided over by Pabst's friend, Wilhelm Canaris.Template:Sfn The main instigator, Pabst, and the alleged shooter, Souchon, were never charged.Template:Sfn Otto Runge, who had struck both victims, received a two-year sentence. The transport leader, Lieutenant Kurt Vogel, was sentenced to two years and four months for disposing of the body. Vogel later escaped from prison with the help of Canaris.Template:Sfn

File:Berlin Friedrichsfelde Zentralfriedhof, Gedenkstätte der Sozialisten (Rondell) - Luxemburg.jpg
Luxemburg's grave in Zentralfriedhof Friedrichsfelde, Berlin

In 2009, the identification of the buried remains was questioned following the discovery of a preserved female corpse in the cellar of Berlin's Charité hospital. Forensic pathologist Michael Tsokos argued it was likely Luxemburg's body, citing features consistent with her (including legs of differing lengths), signs that the body had been submerged, and discrepancies in the original 1919 autopsy. However, a DNA test with a relative proved inconclusive, and the identity of the discovered corpse remains unconfirmed.<ref name="Der Spiegel2">Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

Thought

Template:Libertarian socialism sidebar As a significant Marxist theorist, Luxemburg's work focused on the strategy of revolution, the nature of capitalism, and the meaning of socialist democracy. She was a firm believer in the dialectical materialism of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, viewing history as a dynamic process and insisting on the inseparability of theory and practice.Template:Sfn

Revolutionary socialism and critique of reformism

Luxemburg's most famous contribution to political theory was her intervention in the revisionist debate in the SPD at the turn of the 20th century. In her 1900 pamphlet Social Reform or Revolution?, she mounted a defence of orthodox Marxism against the reformist theories of Eduard Bernstein.Template:Sfn Bernstein had argued that capitalism had adapted and was not heading for an inevitable collapse, and that socialists should therefore abandon the goal of revolution and work for gradual, piecemeal reforms within the existing system.Template:Sfn

Luxemburg argued that this presented a false choice between reform and revolution. For her, the two were dialectically linked: the daily struggle for reforms (such as the eight-hour day or improved trade union rights) was the only means by which the proletariat could become conscious of its class power and prepare itself for the revolutionary seizure of power.Template:Sfnm To abandon the final goal of revolution, she argued, was to transform the socialist movement into a petit-bourgeois reformist party, severing its practical activity from its ultimate purpose and effectively accepting the permanence of capitalism. The fight for reforms was the means of the class struggle; the social revolution was its aim.Template:Sfnm Her response to Bernstein's famous dictum, "The final goal, whatever it may be, is nothing to me, the movement is everything," was to state, "The movement as an end in itself, unrelated to the ultimate goal, is nothing to me; the ultimate goal is everything."Template:Sfn

Mass strike, spontaneity, and the role of the party

File:Rosa Lux Stuttgart 1907.jpg
Luxemburg addressing a crowd in Stuttgart in 1907

Drawing on the experience of the 1905 Russian Revolution, Luxemburg developed her theory of the mass strike as the most important weapon in the proletarian struggle. In her 1906 pamphlet The Mass Strike, the Political Party and the Trade Unions, she argued against the SPD and trade union leadership's view of the mass strike as a single, organised, and controllable action.Template:Sfn Instead, she saw it as "the form of movement of the proletarian mass... in the revolution itself", a continuous process in which economic and political struggles merged, and in which strikes, demonstrations, and uprisings would flow into one another.Template:Sfnm

This theory is often associated with the concept of "spontaneity". For Luxemburg, spontaneity was not a blind, disorganised impulse, but the creative and elemental energy of the masses in action, which the party could not artificially "make" and to which Marxist theory must itself become a historical factor by becoming part of the workers' consciousness.Template:Sfnm The role of the revolutionary party was not to command the masses like an army, but to "hasten the development of things and endeavor to accelerate events" by giving political leadership, clarity, and direction to the spontaneous movement.Template:Sfnm This dialectical relationship between the spontaneous action of the masses and the conscious leadership of the party stood in stark contrast to both the bureaucratic caution of the SPD leadership and Vladimir Lenin's more strictly vanguardist conception of the party.Template:Sfnm In her 1904 essay, "Organizational Questions of Russian Social Democracy", and a 1911 manuscript, "Credo", she critiqued Lenin's ultra-centralist organisational model, arguing that it risked stifling the spontaneous initiative of the working class.Template:Sfnm

Imperialism, nationalism, and war

File:The Accumulation of Capital.jpg
Title page of Luxemburg's The Accumulation of Capital (1913)

Luxemburg's major theoretical work was The Accumulation of Capital (1913), which she presented as a contribution to the economic clarification of imperialism.Template:Sfn She argued that capitalism was driven by an inherent contradiction: it could not realise the surplus value generated within its own closed system, as the revolution would overthrow it long before its economic possibilities were exhausted.Template:Sfn To survive and continue to accumulate, it was therefore compelled to expand into and exploit pre-capitalist spheres, both within its home countries (e.g., the peasantry and artisan classes) and, more importantly, in colonies abroad.Template:Sfnm This ceaseless, competitive drive for control of non-capitalist markets and resources was, for Luxemburg, the economic foundation of imperialism and militarism.Template:Sfn Her analysis notably focused on the "permanent process of coercive expropriation" that imperialism represented, highlighting its violent destruction of "primitive communist" and other non-capitalist societies as an ongoing feature of capital accumulation, not just an initial phase.Template:Sfn

This economic analysis underpinned her political stance against imperialism and war. For her, "the question of militarism and imperialism... form the central axis of political life".Template:Sfn She saw imperialism not as a mere policy choice but as the final, global stage of capitalism, which would inevitably lead to ever more destructive wars and ultimately to "barbarism" unless it was overthrown by international socialist revolution.Template:Sfnm The tendency toward this final economic collapse created a "period of catastrophe" that made revolution an urgent necessity to pre-empt complete disaster.Template:Sfn This conviction was the basis for her consistent internationalism and her critique of nationalism, which she saw as a bourgeois ideology used to divide the working class and tie it to the interests of its own ruling class.Template:Sfnm Her opposition to the "right of nations to self-determination" as a universal slogan, which put her in direct conflict with Lenin, stemmed from this belief. She argued that in the age of imperialism, such a right was a hollow phrase that often served as a cover for the interests of competing imperialist powers and was a harmful distraction from the international class struggle.Template:Sfnm Her doctrinaire position on this matter led some critics, such as Leszek Kołakowski, to accuse her of an "extraordinary lack of political understanding in regard to national questions".Template:Sfn

Critique of the Russian Revolution

Luxemburg enthusiastically welcomed the Russian Revolution but was deeply critical of the Bolsheviks' policies after they seized power. In The Russian Revolution, a manuscript written in prison in 1918 and published after her death, she articulated a fundamental critique of the Bolshevik model of revolution.Template:Sfnm While praising Lenin and Leon Trotsky for their revolutionary courage, she condemned their suppression of the Constituent Assembly, their restriction of suffrage, and their abolition of democratic freedoms.Template:Sfnm She argued that "without general elections, without unrestricted freedom of press and assembly, without a free struggle of opinion, life dies out in every public institution, becomes a mere semblance of life, in which only the bureaucracy remains as the active element."Template:Sfnm Her criticism of the Constituent Assembly's dissolution, however, was based on incomplete information available to her in prison, and she later revised her view, recognizing it as a "counter-revolutionary stronghold" against the workers' councils.Template:Sfnm

Her most famous dictum came from this critique: "Freedom is always and exclusively freedom for the one who thinks differently."Template:Sfnm For Luxemburg, socialist democracy was not something to be granted as a gift after the revolution had been secured, but was the very medium of the revolution itself—the only way for the masses to learn, correct their mistakes, and exercise power.Template:Sfn This did not imply a rejection of the dictatorship of the proletariat, which she saw as necessary to implement socialist measures and defend against counter-revolution. She explicitly defended the Bolsheviks' use of force to break the resistance of the bourgeoisie.Template:Sfn Her concern was for democracy within the proletarian dictatorship, including a plurality of parties and tendencies, fearing that the substitution of a dictatorship of a party or a committee for the dictatorship of the proletariat would lead not to socialism but to a "brutalization of public life".Template:Sfnm She believed the Bolsheviks' errors were a product of the fatal isolation of their revolution, and that its only salvation lay in a successful proletarian revolution in the West, especially in Germany.Template:Sfnm

Legacy

File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-H29710, Berlin-Friedrichsfelde, Revolutionsdenkmal.jpg
Memorial to Luxemburg and Liebknecht in Zentralfriedhof Friedrichsfelde in Berlin, 1926. It was commissioned by the KPD, and destroyed by the Nazis in 1935.

The murder of Rosa Luxemburg transformed her into a martyr for the revolutionary socialist cause. Her legacy, however, has been a subject of intense debate and political contestation ever since.Template:Sfnm In the immediate aftermath, the KPD, under the leadership of Paul Levi, revered her as a founder and theorist, and began the process of collecting and publishing her works.Template:Sfn

The debate over "Luxemburgism" as a distinct political tendency began in earnest after Levi published her critical manuscript on the Russian Revolution in 1922.Template:Sfnm This move, part of an internal party struggle, prompted a sharp response from Lenin. In his famous "chicken and eagle" parable, Lenin praised Luxemburg as a revolutionary "eagle" but enumerated her theoretical "errors"—on the national question, the accumulation of capital, party organisation, and the nature of the state—which he argued must be corrected by the party.Template:Sfnm This set the template for the official Communist interpretation for decades.

During the "Bolshevisation" of the KPD in the mid-1920s, Luxemburgism was systematically constructed as a coherent but fallacious system of thought, a "syphilis bacillus" that needed to be eradicated.Template:Sfn The ultra-left faction led by Ruth Fischer and Arkadi Maslow paired Luxemburgism with Trotskyism as a heresy characterised by a theory of "spontaneity" that underestimated the role of the revolutionary party.Template:Sfn During the Joseph Stalin era, this critique hardened into dogma. Her repeated attacks on Lenin's concept of centralism continued to "strike a nerve", and in 1931 Stalin wrote an article discrediting Luxemburg by citing Lenin's earlier criticisms and accusing her of composing a "utopian and semi-Menshevik scheme of permanent revolution".Template:Sfnm Her ideas were either ignored or denounced as a "deadly enemy" of Leninism.Template:Sfnm Her work provided a "preparatory role" for the development of alternative tendencies within Marxism, such as Western Marxism, which sought to recover the emancipatory goals of socialism from the distortions of both reformism and Stalinism.Template:Sfn

File:Ludwig Binder Haus der Geschichte Studentenrevolte 1968 2001 03 0275.0008 (16474725704).jpg
West German student movement demonstration in West Berlin in 1968, featuring an image of Luxemburg

After the death of Stalin in 1953, there was a renewed interest in Luxemburg's work. In Poland and East Germany, she was partially rehabilitated and celebrated as a national revolutionary figure, though her more critical ideas were often downplayed.Template:Sfn The reception of her ideas in the United States began in earnest in the 1960s, driven largely by dissidents from the Trotskyist movement and the rising New Left. Figures like Hal Draper presented her as a key representative of "socialism from below", while Raya Dunayevskaya saw her as a crucial theorist of revolutionary humanism. Hannah Arendt's 1966 essay in the New York Review of Books paid tribute to her foresight and independence of mind. Collections of her writings were published by the Socialist Workers Party's Pathfinder Press and by Monthly Review Press, bringing her work to a new generation of activists. More recently, a fifteen-volume English edition of her complete works, supported by the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation and directed by Peter Hudis, has further solidified her place in the Anglophone world.Template:Sfn

For many socialists and communists outside the Stalinist tradition, including left communists, Trotskyists, and democratic socialists, she remains a major theoretical and moral touchstone. Her emphasis on democracy and mass action, her critique of bureaucracy and authoritarianism, and her profound humanism continue to inspire revolutionary movements and thinkers around the world.Template:Sfn She has been reclaimed by modern scholars and activists for her relevance to feminist, anti-racist, and postcolonial critiques of capitalism, with some, such as Raya Dunayevskaya, highlighting previously ignored feminist dimensions of her life and thought.Template:Sfnm Her reputation has been particularly strong in the post-colonial world, where, as Michael Löwy notes, she is recognised for having "adopted the viewpoint of the victims of capitalist modernization".Template:Sfn

Commemoration

File:L-L Demo 2016.jpg
Liebknecht-Luxemburg-Demonstration in Berlin, 2016

In Germany, Luxemburg and Liebknecht are honoured annually on the second weekend of January with the Template:Lang in Berlin, which ends at the Template:Lang (Socialists' Memorial) in the Zentralfriedhof Friedrichsfelde. During the German Democratic Republic, the demonstration was a state-sponsored event for the ruling Socialist Unity Party of Germany. The 1988 demonstration was famously used by dissidents to protest the regime by unfurling a banner with Luxemburg's slogan, "Freiheit ist immer Freiheit der Andersdenkenden" ("Freedom is always the freedom of dissenters").<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> The German Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution notes that the idolisation of Luxemburg and Liebknecht remains an important tradition for the German far-left.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

File:RosaLuxemburg2a.jpg
Memorial at the site where Luxemburg's corpse was thrown into the Landwehr Canal

Numerous places in Germany bear her name, notably Rosa-Luxemburg-Platz and its U-Bahn station in Berlin. After German reunification, there were proposals to rename streets and squares in the former East Berlin honouring communist figures, but a commission recommended that Luxemburg's name, among others, should be retained.<ref>David Clay Large (2000), Berlin, Basic Books. pp. 560–561.</ref> A memorial to Luxemburg and Liebknecht designed by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe was built in the Zentralfriedhof Friedrichsfelde in 1926 but destroyed by the Nazis in 1935. At the edge of the Tiergarten, a memorial marks the spot on the Landwehr Canal where her body was thrown into the water.

In her native Poland, Luxemburg's legacy is controversial, primarily due to her opposition to Polish independence.<ref name="przedmo2">Template:Cite book</ref> During the Polish People's Republic, several places and enterprises were named after her, including a manufacturing facility of electric lamps in the Wola district of Warsaw, the Template:Interlanguage link.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> A street in Szprotawa used to be named after Luxemburg (Template:Lang) until it was changed to ulica Różana (Rose street) in September 2018.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Many other streets and locations in Poland either used to be or still are named after her, such as those in Warsaw, Gliwice, Będzin, Szprotawa, Lublin, Polkowice, Łódź, etc.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref name="xav" /><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

Efforts to put up commemorative plaques in her memory have taken place in a number of Polish cities, such as Poznań and her birthplace Zamość. A 45-minute-long sightseeing tour around areas associated with the life of the Polish revolutionary was organised in Warsaw in 2019, where a statue of her by Alfred Jesion was also put on display at the Warsaw Citadel as part of the Gallery of Polish Sculpture of the 1950s.<ref name="xav">Template:Cite web</ref> The commemorative plaque in Poznań, on the building where she lived in during May 1903, was vandalised with paint in 2013.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> An official petition was started in 2021 to name a square in Wrocław after her, but the local government rejected the proposal.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

In arts and literature

File:DSC08757 Frankfurt Rosa-Luxemburg-Straße Portrait.jpg
Graffiti portrait on Rosa-Luxemburg-Straße in Frankfurt

Luxemburg's life and death have inspired numerous works of art and literature. Bertolt Brecht's 1919 poem "Epitaph" honours her, and was set to music by Kurt Weill in The Berlin Requiem. In cinema, her story was most famously depicted in Margarethe von Trotta's 1986 biographical film, Rosa Luxemburg, starring Barbara Sukowa, which won the Best Actress award at the 1986 Cannes Film Festival.Template:Sfn Von Trotta described Luxemburg as "the first victim of National Socialism".Template:Sfn The Quebec painter Jean-Paul Riopelle created a monumental thirty-painting fresco in 1992, Tribute to Rosa Luxemburg, which is on permanent display at the Musée national des beaux-arts du Québec.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

She has appeared as a character in several novels, including Alfred Döblin's Karl and Rosa, Jonathan Rabb's Rosa (2005), and William T. Vollmann's historical fiction Europe Central (2005). The graphic novel Red Rosa (2015) by Kate Evans provides a biographical account of her life. The feminist magazine Lux, launched in 2020, is named in her honour, describing her as "one of the most creative minds to remake the socialist tradition".<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

From 1913 until her death, Luxemburg pursued a lifelong interest in botany by collecting and studying plant specimens.<ref name=":22">Template:Cite journal</ref> Her personal herbarium, comprising 18 notebooks with 377 specimens, is held at the Archive of Modern Records in Warsaw.<ref name=":22" /> She collected many of the plants during her imprisonments, finding in the work a therapeutic escape and a connection to the outside world.<ref name="auto2">Template:Cite web</ref> The collection, which features plants from Berlin, Wronki, Wrocław, and the Alps, contains handwritten notes on the species, location, and date of collection.<ref name=":22" />

Selected works

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Works cited

Further reading

Template:Div col

  • Template:Cite book
  • Template:Cite book
  • Template:Cite book
  • Template:Cite journal
  • Template:Cite book
  • Template:Cite book
  • Template:Cite book
  • Joffre-Eichhorn, Hjalmar Jorge (2021, ed.), Post Rosa: Letters against Barbarism. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung: New York.
  • Kemmerer, Alexandra (2016), "Editing Rosa: Luxemburg, the Revolution, and the Politics of Infantilization". European Journal of International Law, Vol. 27 (3), 853–864. Template:Doi
  • Template:Cite book
  • Template:Cite book
  • Template:Cite book
  • Template:Cite book
  • Weitz, Eric D. (1997). Creating German Communism, 1890–1990: From Popular Protests to Socialist State. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Priestand, David (2009). Red Flag: A History of Communism. New York: Grove Press.
  • Weitz, Eric D. (1994). "'Rosa Luxemburg Belongs to Us!'" German Communism and the Luxemburg Legacy. Central European History (27: 1). pp. 27–64.
  • Template:Cite book
  • Evans, Kate (2015). Red Rosa: A Graphic Biography of Rosa Luxemburg. New York: Verso.
  • Template:Cite book
  • Luban, Ottokar (2017). The Role of the Spartacist Group after 9 November 1918 and the Formation of the KPD. In Hoffrogge, Ralf; LaPorte, Norman (eds.). Weimar Communism as Mass Movement 1918–1933. London: Lawrence & Wishart. pp. 45–65.
  • Kończal, Kornelia (2013), "Ich war, ich bin, ich werde sein'? Rosa Luxemburg in den deutschen und den polnischen Erinnerungen, (with Maciej Górny), in Germanica Wratislaviensia, No. 137, pp. 161–181.
  • Template:Cite book

Template:Div col end

Template:Sister project links

Template:Rosa Luxemburg Template:Communism Template:Socialism Template:Political philosophy Template:Authority control