State defense force

From Vero - Wikipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:About Template:Use American English Template:Use dmy dates Template:Multiple image

In the United States, state defense forces (SDFs) are military units that operate under the sole authority of a state government. State defense forces are authorized by state and federal law and are under the command of the governor of each state.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

State defense forces are distinct from their state's National Guard in that they cannot become federal entities. All state National Guard personnel (including the National Guard of the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the territories of Guam and the Virgin Islands) can be federalized under the National Defense Act Amendments of 1933 with the creation of the National Guard of the United States. This provides the basis for integrating units and personnel of the Army National Guard into the U.S. Army and, since 1947, units and personnel of the Air National Guard into the U.S. Air Force.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

The federal government recognizes state defense forces, as per the Compact Clause of the U.S. Constitution, under Template:UnitedStatesCode which provides that state defense forces as a whole may not be called, ordered, or drafted into the armed forces of the United States, thus preserving their separation from the National Guard. However, under the same law, individual members serving in the state defense force are not exempt from service in the armed forces (i.e., they are not excluded from the draft). Under 32 USC § 109(e), "A person may not become a member of a defense force ... if he is a member of a reserve component of the armed forces."

Nearly every state has laws authorizing state defense forces, and 19 states, plus the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, have active forces with different levels of activity, support, and strength. State defense forces generally operate with emergency management and homeland security missions. Most SDFs are organized as ground units, but air and naval units also exist.<ref name=Texas>Template:Cite web</ref><ref name=ohionaval>Template:Cite web</ref> Depending on the state, they may be variously named as state military, state military force, state guard, state militia, or state military reserve.

Every state defense force is also the command authority for the "unorganized militia", which is defined as every able bodied male between the age of 17 and 45 who is not already serving in some capacity within the armed forces or National Guard.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> The original concept of the unorganized militia being a citizen army which could be raised immediately in times of extreme national emergency. In the modern day military, the unorganized militia is considered obsolete with very few exceptions. One of the only recognized instances where unorganized militia members wear uniforms and actively perform military duties is the Virginia Militia which actively employs officers amongst the various military schools in the state of Virginia.<ref>Code of Virginia, Section 44-117</ref>

History

Origins

From its founding until the early 1900s, the United States maintained only a minimal army and relied on state militias to supply the majority of its troops, with the training and readiness of the latter varying widely.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> As a result of the Spanish–American War and the performance of the militias and other volunteer units during that conflict, Congress was called upon to reform and regulate the training and qualification of state militias. In 1903, with passage of the Militia Act of 1903, the predecessor to the modern-day National Guard was formed. It required the states to divide their militias into two sections. The law recommended the title "National Guard" for the first section, for federal administration, and "Reserve Militia" for the individual states.<ref>32 Stat. 775 (1903)</ref>

World War I

During World War I, Congress authorized the states to maintain Home Guards, which were reserve forces outside the National Guard forces that were then being deployed by the Federal Government as part of the National Army. The Secretary of War was authorized to furnish these Home Guard units with rifles, ammunition, and supplies.<ref>40 Stat. 181 (1917)</ref>

Interwar years

In 1933, Congress finalized the split between the National Guard and the traditional state militias by mandating that all federally funded soldiers take a dual enlistment/commission and thus enter both the state National Guard and the newly created National Guard of the United States, a federal reserve force.

World War II

In 1940, with the onset of World War II and as a result of its federalizing the National Guard, Congress amended the National Defense Act of 1916, and authorized the states to maintain "military forces other than National Guard."<ref>54 Stat. 1206 (1940)</ref>

Cold War

In 1950, with the outbreak of the Korean War and at the urging of the National Guard, Congress reauthorized the separate state military forces for a time period of two years. These state military forces were authorized military training at federal expense, as well as "arms, ammunition, clothing, and equipment," as deemed necessary by the Secretary of the Army.<ref>64 Stat. 1073 (1950)</ref> At the end of the two years, however, they were not reauthorized under federal law.

In 1956, Congress finally revised the law and authorized "state defense forces" permanently under Title 32, Section 109, of the United States Code.<ref>70A Stat. 600 (1956)</ref> Two years later, Congress amended the law and changed the name from "State defense forces" to "defense forces."<ref>72 Stat. 1542 (1958)</ref> Still, it was not until the early Ronald Reagan administration that many states developed their defense forces into elements that existed beyond paper, when the U.S. Department of Defense actively encouraged states to create and maintain SDF units.<ref name="stentiford">Template:Cite book </ref>

By the late 1980s, however, a series of high-profile reports caused several states to shut down or significantly restructure their forces. In 1987, the governor of Utah removed all but 31 officers from the Utah State Guard, after a probe revealed that its ranks were "peppered with neo-Nazis, felons and mental patients."<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Meanwhile, in 1990, the Virginia General Assembly launched an investigation and subsequent overhaul of its state's force after receiving tips that the volunteers were "saving money to buy a tank."<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

Contemporary

File:Virginia Defense Force and National Guard communications exercise.jpg
Members of the Virginia Defense Force and the Virginia National Guard operate a mobile command post.

With the end of the Cold War came a general decrease of interest in state defense forces. The September 11 attacks, however, generated additional attention and, with it, greater scrutiny from some in the United States military who questioned the training and equipment of the units and whether they provided an outlet for "warrior wannabes" who would not otherwise qualify for service in the armed forces.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

In 2008, Alaska disarmed its state defense force after an investigation concluded the lack of training intensity or standardization was a potential legal liability to the state.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> By 2010 the status of the force had been downgraded even further, with the Adjutant-General of the Alaska National Guard informing volunteers that they would only be called upon as a "reserve of last resort to be used only in the most extreme emergencies."<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> The ASDF remained deliberately hamstrung for several years, until Governor Bill Walker overruled the Adjutant-General in 2016 when he announced his intention to reform the Alaska State Defense Force by expanding it further into rural Alaska and improving training standards.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

Further controversy was stoked by a New York Times report which found many senior officers in the New York Guard had little or no formal military training despite holding, in some cases, general officer ranks. The former commander of the force, Pierre David Lax, noted that, "if you are friendly with the governor and you always wanted to be a general, you ask the governor to make you a general, and poof, you are a brigadier general." Another former commander asserted he regularly awarded titles to members of the New York legislature in exchange for their support of budgetary allocations to the force. The report also noted that a majority of the unit's rare deployments involved providing ceremonial support, such as bands and color guards, to the state government.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

File:A Georgia State Defense Force Volunteer passes a sandbag to a Georgia Army National Guard Soldier.jpg
A Georgia State Defense Force Volunteer passes a sandbag to a Georgia Army National Guard Soldier during a flood preparation mission.

An April 2014 Department of Defense report by the Inspector General's office reported confusion and inconsistency among state adjutant generals as to the use and status of state defense forces. The Inspector General's office reported an under-utilization of state defense force capabilities due to a lack of clarity in the US Code regarding the use of SDFs, fueling fear that using funds and assets acquired through the federal government for state defense forces could run afoul of regulations. (While the National Guard is operated by the states, most of their equipment and funding comes from the federal government.) This fear of violating regulations also inhibited their use and integration with their National Guard counterparts, preventing them from conducting joint operations alongside one another, and also from volunteering in support of federal missions. Other problems cited by the Inspector General's office were a lack of standardization in training and physical fitness, raising questions as to the ability of SDFs to work alongside their National Guard counterparts, and a lack of coordination with and support from the Department of Defense. During a survey conducted by the Inspector General of SDF commanders and adjutant generals, 18 of 19 considered their SDFs to be part of the organized militia and subject to the Code of Military Justice, 14 of 18 considered the members of SDFs to be "soldiers", 14 of 18 considered SDF personnel to be "lawful belligerents" under the rules of war, and only 4 of 19 authorized their personnel to conduct firearms training. Almost all of the missions reported to the IG's office were non-military in nature, including small-scale search and rescue, disaster management, and other unarmed, homeland security related-tasks.<ref name=DODIG-2014-065>Template:Cite web</ref>

Due to public fears over the Jade Helm 15 exercises held throughout a number of southwestern states, on 28 April 2015, Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas ordered a call-up of the Texas State Guard to monitor the exercises and facilitate communication between US special operations forces conducting training and the governor's office.<ref>Template:Cite newsTemplate:Cbignore</ref>

In early 2020, a number of state defense forces were activated to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. As of April 2020, the Alaska State Defense Force,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> the California State Guard,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> the Governor's Guards of Connecticut,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> the Georgia State Defense Force,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> the Indiana Guard Reserve,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> the Maryland Defense Force,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> the New York Guard,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> the Ohio Military Reserve,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> the South Carolina State Guard,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> the Tennessee State Guard,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> the Texas State Guard,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> and the Virginia Defense Force<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> had all contributed members to their respective states' efforts in combating the pandemic.

In 2022, the Florida State Guard was restored, and throughout 2023 and 2024 created aerial, maritime, land, and special units.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> In 2023, Florida approved a $107 million budget for 2023–2024.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> In 2024, signifying cross-state cooperation and operations by State defense forces, the Florida State Guard sent troops to Texas to support border operations.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

Future

A 2003 article in the United States Army War College's Parameters journal recommended that "United States Northern Command (NORTHCOM) should ensure that future contingency planning efforts for homeland security operations fully incorporate the valuable capabilities that State Defense Forces can provide."<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> In the decade following that article, however, no significant action has been taken on the recommendation.

Several bills have been unsuccessfully introduced in Congress since the early 1990s seeking to improve the readiness of state defense forces. The most recent, H.R. 206, introduced in 2009 by Rep. Joe Wilson of South Carolina, would have allowed the U.S. Secretary of Defense to transfer surplus U.S. military equipment to state defense forces. Co-sponsors of the bill included Jim Marshall and Frank Wolf. Congress took no action on the measure before adjourning.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

In recent years, state defense forces have focused on retooling their capabilities to be better prepared for future missions by improving their professionalism and interoperability with other agencies. The development of professional commands to support the National Guard, especially medical commands to buttress civil authorities during a civil crisis, has become an emerging trend.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Several state defense forces have begun to shift their focus to preparing for larger emergencies which may require multiple states to coordinate relief efforts. In July 2015, the Virginia Defense Force headed a multi-state communications exercise, the first ever of its kind, where the VDF practiced long-distance radio communications with the Tennessee State Guard, Indiana Guard Reserve, Texas State Guard, and the California State Military Reserve.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Further efforts at standardizing training between state defense forces by setting competency requirements have been undertaken by the State Guard Association of the United States, which followed its Military Emergency Management Specialist training program with a JAG Academy<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> an Engineer Specialty Qualification Badge,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> and plans for a Medical Academy in the future.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

Individual states have made efforts to increase their capabilities to be prepared to take on future missions. In March 2017, the California State Military Reserve activated its Maritime Component to lead and assist in future homeland security missions while working in conjunction with other agencies, including the Coast Guard Auxiliary, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, CalTrans, and other civilian departments.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> As of May 2017, the Maryland Defense Force has significantly reorganized; the number of available officer billets has been shrunk, and the job descriptions reorganized, in order to avoid having a top-heavy organizational structure. New units, including the Maryland Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) Support Unit, have been approved, and others, such as the MDDF Cyber Unit, have planned expansions. Training standards were also heightened, with the MDDF requiring that drill participation, age, height, and weight requirements be more strictly enforced. Further, all new soldiers are currently required to earn their Military Emergency Management Specialist Badge. These changes were made with the goal that the future MDDF would be able to "seamlessly integrate into missions with the National Guard."<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

Florida, in its effort to develop its State Guard, in 2023 it received approval to construct its headquarters and training center in Flagler County.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> In September 2024 it was reported that the Florida State Guard plans to build an airbase at Tallahassee International Airport, with the planned site consisting of two hangars, an office, and accompanying infrastructure.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

List of state defense forces

File:State defense forces, striped w territories.svg
Template:LegendTemplate:LegendTemplate:LegendTemplate:LegendTemplate:Legend

There are currently 20 active state defense forces and 5 active naval militias. The Puerto Rico State Guard includes an air support component, the 1st Air Base Group, that support the operations of the Puerto Rico Air National Guard.

State or territory Status Ground or air division Naval division Air wing State law Weapons training
Alabama Inactive Alabama State Defense Force<ref name="ala">Template:Cite web</ref> <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> No
Alaska Active Alaska State Defense Force Alaska Naval Militia<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> YesTemplate:Citation needed
American Samoa Not authorized under Title 32
Arizona Inactive Arizona State Guard <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Arkansas Inactive Arkansas State Guard <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
California Active California State Guard<ref name=csmr /> Cal Guard Maritime<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Yes <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Yes<ref name="dodis">Template:Cite web</ref>
Colorado Inactive* Colorado State Defense Force <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Connecticut Ceremonial Connecticut State Militia Units<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Connecticut Naval Militia (inactive) <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Yes<ref name="dodis"/>
Delaware Inactive Delaware State Guard <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
District of Columbia Not established District of Columbia Reserve Corps District of Columbia Naval Battalion <ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Florida Active Florida State Guard Florida Naval Militia (inactive) <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Yes (some units)<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Georgia Active Georgia State Defense Force<ref name="georgia">Template:Cite web</ref> Georgia Naval Militia (inactive) <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Yes (some units)<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Guam Inactive Guam Militia <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Hawai'i Inactive Hawaii Territorial Guard Hawaii Naval Militia <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Idaho Inactive Idaho State Guard <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Illinois Inactive Illinois State Guard<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Illinois Naval Militia<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Indiana Active Indiana Guard Reserve<ref name="www.in.gov" /> Indiana Naval Militia (inactive) <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Yes<ref name="dodis" />
Iowa Inactive Iowa State Guard <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Kansas Inactive Kansas State Guard <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Kentucky Inactive Kentucky Active Militia <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Louisiana Active Louisiana State Guard Louisiana Naval Militia <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Yes<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Maine Inactive Maine State Guard <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Maryland Active Maryland Defense Force<ref name="mddf.Maryland"/> Maryland Naval Militia (inactive) <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> NoTemplate:Citation needed
Massachusetts Inactive Massachusetts State Defense Force<ref name="mass">Template:Cite web</ref> Massachusetts Naval Militia <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> NoTemplate:Citation needed
Ceremonial National Lancers<ref name="lancers">Template:Cite web</ref> <ref name="lancers"/>
Michigan Active Michigan Defense Force<ref name="Michigan">Template:Cite web</ref> <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Minnesota Inactive Minnesota State Guard Minnesota Naval Militia (inactive) <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Mississippi Active Mississippi State Guard<ref name="Mississippi"/> <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Yes (Simulated only)Template:Citation needed
Missouri Inactive Missouri State Defense Force Missouri Naval Militia <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Montana Not established <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Nebraska Inactive Nebraska State Guard <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Nevada Not established <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
New Hampshire Inactive New Hampshire State Guard <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
New Jersey Inactive New Jersey State Guard New Jersey Naval Militia<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
New Mexico Active New Mexico State Defense Force<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
New York Active New York Guard<ref name="dmna.state.ny.us"/> New York Naval Militia<ref name="nynm"/> <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Yes (Competition only)Template:Citation needed
North Carolina Inactive North Carolina State Defense Militia<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> North Carolina Naval Militia <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
North Dakota Not established <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Northern Mariana Islands Not authorized under Title 32
Ohio Active Ohio Military Reserve<ref name="ohio.gov" /> Ohio Naval Militia<ref name=ohionaval /> <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Yes (Honor Guard only)Template:Citation needed
Oklahoma Inactive Oklahoma State Guard <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Oregon Active Oregon Civil Defense Force<ref name="Oregon">Template:Cite web</ref> <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Pennsylvania Inactive Pennsylvania State Guard <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Puerto Rico Active Puerto Rico State Guard<ref name="pr.ngb.army.mil" /> Yes <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Yes
Rhode Island Inactive Rhode Island State Guard Rhode Island Naval Militia <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Ceremonial Rhode Island Independent Military Organizations Providence naval battalion (inactive) <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
South Carolina Active South Carolina State Guard<ref name="sg.sc.gov"/> South Carolina Naval Militia <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Yes<ref name="dodis"/>
South Dakota Inactive South Dakota State Guard <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Tennessee Active Tennessee State Guard<ref name=tnsg>Template:Cite web</ref> <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Yes (Range qualifications for military police units)<ref>Template:Cite webTemplate:Cbignore</ref>
Texas Active Texas State Guard<ref name=Texas /> No <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Yes (some units)<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
US Virgin Islands Not established <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Utah Inactive Utah State Defense Force <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Vermont Active Vermont State Guard<ref name="Vermont">Template:Cite web</ref> Yes <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Yes (Competitive only)Template:Citation needed
Virginia Active Virginia Defense Force<ref name=Virginia/> VDF Rivereine Detachment Unit (disbanded)<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Inactive <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> No
Washington Active Washington State Guard<ref name=Washington/> <ref>Template:Cite web</ref> NoTemplate:Citation needed
West Virginia Not established <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Wisconsin Inactive Wisconsin State Defense Force Wisconsin Naval Militia <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Wyoming Not established <ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

* Colorado does not operate an active state defense force, but rather has a statutory state defense force staffed by one individual appointed by the governor.


  • NY had an active organization called the NY State Reserve Defense Force (defunct in 2013), led by a retired US Army Brigadier General, that operated similar to the NY Guard and performed funeral honor guard, disaster response, volunteer event security services, operated a year-round 500 bed homeless shelter, and performed other duties between 2003 and 2013, until it ceased operations due to the inability to obtain state/federal/grant funding and legislative recognition. The NY SRDF performed honor guard services at more than 80 funerals, responded to more than 30 local disasters/incidents, and provided event security services at more than 125 events. The NY SRDF was made up of licensed security guards, military veterans, volunteer fire/EMS personnel, doctors, chefs, and other professionals who sought to serve their local communities. Members wore a navy-blue mess dress uniform with gold buttons and trouser stripes for formal occasions, a similar navy-blue class A dress uniform for funerals, and grey tactical uniforms for disaster response and event security services. The NY SRDF had over 250 members before it ceased operations.


  • Pennsylvania currently has an active ceremonial and charitable organization called the Pennsylvania State Defense Force Association that attends public events in uniform. Its members are all volunteers.


Structure

Personnel and training

Some state defense forces advertise recruitment and physical standards lower than the U.S. military with relaxed waiver standards. While other state defense forces, and specific units, advertise professional military and physical fitness standards to retain integration with National Guard counterparts and more physically demanding state and interagency missions.

File:Cal Guard - Cal Fire Joint Team Rattlesnake.jpg
Cal Guard CPT Foster, an officer in California's SDF, the California State Guard, serving as a Fire Team commander leading State and National Guard firefighters in the 2020 California fire season.

California, for instance, requires no physical fitness test prior to entry and has weight/height standards significantly more relaxed than the federal service for certain units, but certain jobs — like firefighters, search and rescue, and certain maritime search and rescue/dive personnel within the Cal Guard's Emergency Response Command and Maritime Service — require passing a physical fitness test, pack hikes, and tryouts.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> California State Guard wildland firefighters, for example, must complete the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Red Card standards, then complete a Cal Fire interagency training program alongside their National Guard counterparts.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> In the Texas State Guard, there are minimal requirements for general accession, but joining specialized teams like the Dive, Rescue, and Recovery (DR&R) Team requires physical fitness testing and completion of the Texas Dive School.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

File:Texas State Guard Maritime Regiment, Dive, Rescue, & Recovery (DR&R) Team Training.jpg
PO1 John Arnn and GySgt Clayton Cormack are adjusting SCPO Gary Wilson's equipment, members of the Texas State Guard Maritime Regiment, Dive, Rescue, & Recovery (DR&R) Team.

Officer Candidate Schools are also maintained by the active State Defense Forces of the United States by direction of their respective state military departments and by the state's National Guard Adjutant General. Similar to their state's National Guard counterparts who take a dual federal and state military commission, military officers who are commissioned through a SDF Officer Candidate School take a sole military commission to the state that they support, recognized by their state's military code and Template:UnitedStatesCode. In states with full integration of state military resources (SDF and National Guard counterparts) the curriculum is often similar, with the National Guard curriculum taking on additional requirements to meet federal recognition (referred to as FEDREC<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>). For example, California maintains both Officer Candidate Schools at Camp San Luis Obispo, with the State Guard OCS being 11–12 months and the National Guard OCS being 16–18 months, both celebrate a joint graduation.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

The Military Emergency Management Specialist Badge,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> created by the State Guard Association of the United States, has become a common training focal point among state defense forces. Alabama, California, Indiana, Ohio and others have adopted the MEMS Badge as a basic qualification required of all members desiring promotion. Training is conducted both online, and through MEMS academies in each state, and includes course material provided by FEMA and other agencies, as well as practical experience in local disaster planning and exercise management.

Community Emergency Response Teams (CERTs) are being organized by several SDFs by utilizing training offered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Citizen Corps. Some states follow the lead of the Army and offer a permanent tab (worn in a similar manner as the Army's Ranger and Sapper tabs) as an incentive to become certified as part of the local or unit CERT team.

State defense forces may incorporate Medical Reserve Corps units into their organizational structure. The 47th Medical Company (MRC), of the New Mexico State Defense Force,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> the 10th Medical Regiment of the Maryland Defense Force,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> and the Medical Brigade of the Texas State Guard<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> receive training and recognition from the Medical Reserve Corps program sponsored by the Office of the Surgeon General of the United States through the Citizen Corps program, and are simultaneously organized as units of their respective state defense force.

Weapons qualification and training is provided in some SDFs. However, most SDFs do not require weapons proficiency. A 2006 report by the U.S. Freedom Foundation, an organization affiliated with the State Guard Association of the United States,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> recommended minimum standards for state defense forces, including weapons training, but the report has been largely ignored. Some SDFs have laws that in the event of deployment by order of the state legislature and/or governor, they will become armed.

Uniforms

File:SDFBranchInsigniaColor.jpg
SDF Branch Insignia

As a general rule, state defense forces wear standard U.S. military uniforms with insignia closely matching those of their federal counterparts. SDF units generally wear red name tags on service uniforms (as specifically prescribed by AR 670–1, chapter 2–7, paragraph k and chapter 23–8, paragraph c)<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> for SDF units when adopting the Army Service Uniform or Battle Dress Uniform (BDU), and name tapes on Army Combat Uniforms (ACU) or BDUs use the state defense force name or state name rather than "U.S. Army." Standard U.S. Army branch insignia are often used or a unique "state guard" branch insignia consisting of a crossed musket and sword is alternatively used.

File:SDF Flash.GIF
SDF beret flash used by several states.

Where berets are worn, some state defense forces use a beret flash similar to the one the U.S. Army uses, but in bright red thread instead of the Army's blue. Other states have beret flashes that are often based on their state flag.

Uniforms vary from state to state and tend to have only subtle differences. For example, the Texas State Guard wears standard U.S. Army camouflage uniforms, a state guard unit patch, and the "U.S. Army" name tape replaced with one reading "Texas State Guard." Similarly, the California State Guard wears a uniform identical to their National Guard counterparts except for the unit patch, beret flash, and the "California" name tape. Outer garments such as a Gore-Tex jacket have a subdued "CA" beneath the rank insignia.<ref name=cal670>Template:Cite web</ref> A similar pattern can be found in the New York Guard. The Georgia State Defense Force often works in tandem with and support of federal troops. The Georgia State Defense Force wears the OCP pattern of the ACU with a standard SDF red flash on the army black beret and "Georgia" in place of the "U.S. Army" uniform name tape.

The few states with both SDF air and naval units wear modified USAF and USN/USMC uniforms. Currently, only Ohio, Alaska and New York have uniformed naval militias. Only California, Vermont, and Puerto Rico have an air wing, though Indiana formerly had an Air Guard Reserve. In all cases, the state adjutant general has the final say on uniforms worn by state defense forces, though federal service regulations generally shape the policies of each state.

File:March 2024 SDF Uniform Guidance.png
March 2024 changes prescribed by CNGBI 5500.01A.

In March 2024, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau signed an updated Chief of the National Guard Bureau Instruction (CNGBI) 5500.01A National Guard Interaction with State Defense Forces. In this new regulation, it outlined new uniform requirements of SDFs who wear modified US Army Utility Uniforms. These new requirements are the responsibilities of State Adjutant Generals to enforce on their state's SDFs. The new regulations include: solid red background nametapes with white lettering, solid red backgrounds and white ranks for rank tabs, solid red covers with white ranks, the requirement of full color state flags, full color unit patches, and a tab on the left shoulder displaying "SDF" in white lettering on a solid red background. Notably, this regulation also disallowed the display of previously earned qualification badges on the utility uniforms if the badge was issued by the US Armed Forces. For example, if a state SDF member earned a parachutist badge while in the US Armed Forces, they are no longer allowed to display said badge on their SDF uniform. Federal awards not issued by the US Armed Forces are still authorized. This was largely seen by SDF groups, including the State Guard Association of the United States, as an attempt to discredit the legitimacy of SDFs; concerned it would cause confusion among civilians. Proponents argued that it was necessary to ensure there was no confusion between SDFs and the National Guard.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

State defense force utility uniforms

Force Branch tape reads Branch, Rank, and Name Tape colors Insignia

(SSI)

Head covering Uniform type
Alaska State Defense Force<ref name="alaska">Template:Cite web</ref> ALASKA Black on OCP Subdued OCP patrol cap OCP ACU
California State Guard<ref name="csmr">Template:Cite web</ref> CALIFORNIA<ref name="cal670" /> White on Black
 Subdued Template:Stack OCP patrol cap

Black beret with royal blue flash with yellow and red slash

OCP ACU
Georgia State Defense Force<ref name="georgia" /> GEORGIA SDF<ref name="GSMR R670-1">Wear and Appearance of Uniforms and Insignia, Georgia State Defense Force Regulation 670-1, Georgia State Defense Force, dated 15 November 2009, last accessed 1 May 2020</ref> Black on Coyote Subdued Coyote ball cap
Black beret with red SDF flash (see above) 		OCP ACU
Florida State Guard FL STATE GUARD Black on UCP Subdued UCP patrol cap

UCP sun hat (boonie)

UCP ACU
Indiana Guard Reserve<ref name="www.in.gov">Template:Cite web</ref> INDIANA Maroon on OCP Subdued Black patrol cap OCP ACU
Maryland Defense Force<ref name="mddf.Maryland">Template:Cite web</ref> MARYLAND Maroon on OCP Subdued Template:Stack OCP ball cap

Black beret with black and yellow divided flash with white and red slashes<ref name="MDF Photo">Maryland Defense Force (MDDF) ceremony at Pikesville Armory, MDF's Facebook page, dated 3 May 2014, last accessed 1 May 2020</ref>

OCP ACU
Massachusetts National Lancers MASSACHUSETTS Black on OCP Unsubdued OCP patrol cap

Pith Helmet

OCP ACU

Class A and B, and ceremonial lancer uniform.

Michigan Defense Force<ref name="Michigan" /> MICHIGAN Black on OCP Subdued OCP patrol cap OCP ACU
Mississippi State Guard<ref name="Mississippi">Template:Cite web</ref> MS STATE GUARD Crimson on OCP Subdued OCP patrol cap
Black beret with red SDF flash (see above) 		OCP ACU
New York Guard<ref name="dmna.state.ny.us">Template:Cite web</ref> N.Y. GUARD Black on White Subdued Template:Stack Black patrol cap
Black beret with gray flash (Dress Blues Only) 		OCP ACU<ref name="ny13342">New York Guard Directive 1334.2</ref>
New York Naval Militia<ref name="nynm">Template:Cite web</ref> N.Y. NAVAL MILITIA Yellow on NWU
Black on MARPAT
White on blue 		Yellow on NWU
Black on MARPAT
White on blue 		Naval style 8-point cover
Marine style 8-point cover
baseball cap 		NWU/MARPAT/ODU
Ohio Military Reserve<ref name="ohio.gov">Template:Cite web</ref> OHIO Red on White Unsubdued OD patrol cap OCP ACU
Ohio Naval Militia<ref name=ohionaval /> OHIO NAVY Gold/silver on navy blue Gold/silver on navy blue (E-4 & up) Naval style 8-point cover NWU
Oregon Civil Defense Force<ref name="Oregon"/> OREGON Black on UCP Subdued UCP patrol cap UCP ACU
Puerto Rico State Guard<ref name="pr.ngb.army.mil">Template:Cite web</ref> PRSG ARMY
PRSG AIR FORCE 		Black on OCP Subdued OCP patrol capTemplate:Stack Black beret with yellow & red flash reminiscent of Spanish heraldry OCP ACU
South Carolina State Guard<ref name="sg.sc.gov">Template:Cite web</ref> S.C. STATE GUARD Silver on Black Subdued OCP patrol cap OCP ACU
Tennessee State Guard<ref name=tnsg/> TN STATE GUARD Maroon on UCP Unsubdued UCP patrol cap UCP ACU
Texas State Guard TEXAS STATE GUARD Black on OCP Subdued Template:Stack OCP patrol cap

Black beret with red, white, and blue beret flash

OCP ACU
Vermont State Guard<ref name="Vermont"/> VT STATE GUARD Black on OCP Unsubdued OCP patrol cap OCP ACU
Virginia Defense Force<ref name=Virginia>Template:Cite web</ref> VIRGINIA Black on OD Subdued BDU patrol cap WOODLAND TRU
Washington State Guard<ref name=Washington>Template:Cite web</ref> WA STATE GUARD Black on OCP Subdued Template:Stack OCP patrol cap

Black beret with yellow, green, and white beret flash

OCP ACU

Special units

File:Maryland Defense Force Band plays at the State Defense Force Conference.jpg
The Maryland Defense Force Band playing at a state defense force conference in 2015.

SDFs include a variety of special units including medical, aviation, and ceremonial units. The following are examples:

Federal activation

The U.S. Constitution, coupled with several statutes and cases, details the relationship of state defense forces to the federal government. Outside of 32 U.S.C. 109, the U.S. Supreme Court noted: "It is true that the state defense forces 'may not be called, ordered, or drafted into the armed forces.' 32 U.S.C. 109(c). It is nonetheless possible that they are subject to call under 10 U.S.C. 331–333, which distinguish the 'militia' from the 'armed forces,' and which appear to subject all portions of the 'militia' – organized or not – to call if needed for the purposes specified in the Militia Clauses" (Perpich v. Department of Defense, 496 U.S. 334 (1990)).Template:Ref The Court, however, explicitly noted that it was not deciding this issue.<ref>Perpich, at 352, n.25</ref> The following is an extract of the laws which the Court cited as possibly giving the federal government authority to activate the state defense forces:

10 U.S.C. 251 – "Federal aid for State governments"

Whenever there is an insurrection in any State against its government, the President may, upon the request of its legislature or of its governor if the legislature cannot be convened, call into Federal service such of the militia of the other States, in the number requested by that State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to suppress the insurrection.

10 U.S.C. 252 – "Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority"

Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State or Territory by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.

10 U.S.C. 253 – "Interference with State and Federal law"

The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it -

(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.

State defense force reactivation efforts

A number of legislators have spearheaded attempts to reactivate the state defense forces of their states. In 2011, a bill was introduced in the New Hampshire General Court which, if passed, would permanently reestablish the New Hampshire State Guard. The bill did not pass.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> The same year, Governor Jan Brewer signed a bill which authorized the organization of a state defense force in Arizona.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

In 2018, Kansas state senator Dennis Pyle petitioned the Governor of Kansas to reactivate the Kansas State Guard, in part to offer an additional security resource for schools.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

In 2019, Pennsylvania State Representative Chris Rabb proposed legislation which would reactivate and modernize the Pennsylvania State Guard in order to "address the epidemic of gun violence, domestic terrorism, and other inter-related public health crises."<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

In December 2021, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis announced plans to reestablish the Florida State Guard as a 200-person volunteer force that would act independently of the federal government in disaster relief efforts.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> The reactivated Florida State Guard was announced in June 2022.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

In January 2022, Oklahoma State Senator Nathan Dahm introduced legislation to reactivate the Oklahoma State Guard.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref> The bill failed in the Republican-led Oklahoma Senate Veterans Committee in February 2022.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>

In February 2024, Arizona State Representative Joseph Chaplik introduced Arizona House Concurrent Resolution 2059 to establish the Arizona State Guard. The Resolution notably includes granting the Arizona State Guard the authority to make arrests and enforce laws.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> That same month, multiple West Virginia State Delegates introduced West Virginia House Bill 5525, or the West Virginia State Guard Act. This bill would direct the governor of West Virginia to establish and maintain a State Defense Force for West Virginia. Prior to this, a West Virginia State Guard was authorized for creation by the governor, but this Act would direct the governor to create one. This bill notably includes several tax and education benefits for a service commitment.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

In 2025, Governor Kevin Stitt announced his desire to reestablish the Oklahoma State Guard.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> The same year, Wyoming State Senator Dan Laursen introduced a bill into the Wyoming Legislature to introduce the Wyoming State Guard.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

Notable members

See also

Notes

a.Template:NotePub. L. 114–328 renumbered 10 U.S.C. 331-333 as 10 U.S.C. 251-253

References

Template:Reflist

Template:State Defense Forces Template:Military and Police Auxiliary Organizations within the United States Template:Authority control

Retrieved from "https://wiki.sarg.dev/index.php?title=State_defense_force&oldid=247550"