Tyranny of the majority

From Vero - Wikipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:For multi Tyranny of the majority refers to a situation in majority rule where the preferences and interests of the majority dominate the political landscape, potentially sidelining or repressing minority groups and using majority rule to take non-democratic actions.<ref name=":0">Template:Cite journal</ref> This idea has been discussed by various thinkers, including John Stuart Mill in On Liberty<ref>John Stuart Mill. [1] </ref> and Alexis de Tocqueville in Democracy in America.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

To reduce the risk of majority tyranny, modern democracies frequently have countermajoritarian institutions that restrict the ability of majorities to repress minorities and stymie political competition.<ref name=":0" /><ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> In the context of a nation, constitutional limits on the powers of a legislative body such as a bill of rights or supermajority clause have been used. Separation of powers or judicial independence may also be implemented.<ref name="Przeworski2">A Przeworski, JM Maravall, I NetLibrary Democracy and the Rule of Law (2003) p. 223</ref>

In social choice, a tyranny-of-the-majority scenario can be formally defined as a situation where the candidate or decision preferred by a majority is greatly inferior (hence "tyranny") to the socially optimal candidate or decision according to some measure of excellence such as total utilitarianism or the egalitarian rule.Template:Cn

Origin of the term

The origin of the term "tyranny of the majority" is commonly attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville, who used it in his book Democracy in America. It appears in Part 2 of the book in the title of Chapter 8, "What Moderates the Tyranny of the Majority in the United States' Absence of Administrative Centralization" (Template:Langx<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>) and in the previous chapter in the names of sections such as "The Tyranny of the Majority" and "Effects of the Tyranny of the Majority on American National Character; the Courtier Spirit in the United States".<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

While the specific phrase "tyranny of the majority" is frequently attributed to various Founding Fathers of the United States, only John Adams is known to have used it, arguing against government by a single unicameral elected body. Writing in defense of the Constitution in March 1788,<ref>John Adams, A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America, Vol. 3 (London: 1788), p. 290-291, 310.</ref> Adams referred to "a single sovereign assembly, each member…only accountable to his constituents; and the majority of members who have been of one party" as a "tyranny of the majority", attempting to highlight the need instead for "a mixed government, consisting of three branches". Constitutional author James Madison presented a similar idea in Federalist 10, citing the destabilizing effect of "the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority" on a government, though the essay as a whole focuses on the Constitution's efforts to mitigate factionalism generally.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

Later users include Edmund Burke, who wrote in a 1790 letter that "The tyranny of a multitude is a multiplied tyranny."<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> It was further popularised by John Stuart Mill, influenced by Tocqueville, in On Liberty (1859). Friedrich Nietzsche used the phrase in the first sequel to Human, All Too Human (1879).<ref>See for example maxim 89 of Friedrich Nietzsche, Human, All Too Human: First Sequel: Mixed Opinions and Maxims, 1879</ref> Ayn Rand wrote that individual rights are not subject to a public vote, and that the political function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by majorities and "the smallest minority on earth is the individual".<ref>Ayn Rand (1961), "Collectivized 'Rights,'" The Virtue of Selfishness.</ref> In Herbert Marcuse's 1965 essay Repressive Tolerance, he said "tolerance is extended to policies, conditions, and modes of behavior which should not be tolerated because they are impeding, if not destroying, the chances of creating an existence without fear and misery" and that "this sort of tolerance strengthens the tyranny of the majority against which authentic liberals protested".<ref>The Repressive Tolerance by Herbert Marcuse</ref> In 1994, legal scholar Lani Guinier used the phrase as the title for a collection of law review articles.<ref>Lani Guinier, The Tyranny of the Majority (Free Press: 1994)</ref>

Examples

Herbert Spencer, in "The Right to Ignore the State" (1851), pointed the problem with the following example:<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Template:Quote

Concurrent majority

Template:Main

19th century concurrent majority theories held logical counterbalances to standard tyranny of the majority harms originating from Antiquity and onward. Essentially, illegitimate or temporary coalitions that held majority volume could disproportionately outweigh and hurt any significant minority, by nature and sheer volume. Calhoun's contemporary doctrine was presented as one of limitation within American democracy to prevent traditional tyranny, whether actual or imagined.<ref name="lacy94">Lacy K. Ford Jr., "Inventing the Concurrent Majority: Madison, Calhoun, and the Problem of Majoritarianism in American Political Thought", The Journal of Southern History, Vol. 60, No. 1 (Feb., 1994), pp. 19–58 in JSTOR</ref>

Viewpoints

James Madison

Federalist No. 10 "The Same Subject Continued: The Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection" (November 23, 1787):<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>

The inference to which we are brought is, that the CAUSES of faction cannot be removed, and that relief is only to be sought in the means of controlling its EFFECTS. If a faction consists of less than a majority, relief is supplied by the republican principle, which enables the majority to defeat its sinister views by regular vote. It may clog the administration, it may convulse the society; but it will be unable to execute and mask its violence under the forms of the Constitution. When a majority is included in a faction, the form of popular government, on the other hand, enables it to sacrifice to its ruling passion or interest both the public good and the rights of other citizens. To secure the public good and private rights against the danger of such a faction, and at the same time to preserve the spirit and the form of popular government, is then the great object to which our inquiries are directed...By what means is this object attainable? Evidently by one of two only. Either the existence of the same passion or interest in a majority at the same time must be prevented, or the majority, having such coexistent passion or interest, must be rendered, by their number and local situation, unable to concert and carry into effect schemes of oppression.

Alexis de Tocqueville

With respect to American democracy, Tocqueville, in his book Democracy in America, says: Template:Quote

Template:Quote

Template:Quote

Critique by Robert A. Dahl

Robert A. Dahl argues that the tyranny of the majority is a spurious dilemma (p. 171):<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Template:Quote

Trampling the rights of minorities

Regarding recent American politics (specifically initiatives), Donovan et al. argue that: Template:Quote

Public choice theory

The notion that, in a democracy, the greatest concern is that the majority will tyrannise and exploit diverse smaller interests, has been criticised by Mancur Olson in The Logic of Collective Action, who argues instead that narrow and well organised minorities are more likely to assert their interests over those of the majority.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

Class studies

Tyranny of the majority has also been prevalent in some class studies. Rahim Baizidi uses the concept of "democratic suppression" to analyze the tyranny of the majority in economic classes. According to this, the majority of the upper and middle classes, together with a small portion of the lower class, form the majority coalition of conservative forces in the society.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>

See also

Template:Wikiquote

References

Template:Reflist

Further reading

Template:Conformity Template:Political philosophy Template:Authoritarian types of rule

Retrieved from "https://wiki.sarg.dev/index.php?title=Tyranny_of_the_majority&oldid=221850"