USS Hawaii (CB-3)

Template:Infobox ship imageTemplate:Infobox ship careerTemplate:Infobox ship characteristics

USS Hawaii (CB-3)<ref group=A>Hawaii was never commissioned into the United States Navy, so it never carried the official USS marker before its formal name. That designation has been included in this article's title to adhere to Wikipedia naming conventions.</ref> was intended to be the third member of the Template:Sclass large cruisers. It was the first United States Navy ship to be named after the then-Territory of Hawaii. Because HawaiiTemplate:'s construction was delayed by higher-priority ships like aircraft carriers, her keel was not laid until December 1943, about two years after her sister ship Template:USS.

Hawaii was launched in late 1945, but post-war budget cutbacks necessitated her cancellation in 1947. The Alaska-class large cruisers were seen as requiring a crew almost as large as a Template:Sclass or Template:Sclass, while the armor and protection of the capital ship-sized Hawaii was no better than a Template:Sclass and this was particularly significant as the underwater protection designed into Hawaii was poor. In a famous Proceedings article in January 1949, Frank Uhlig dismissed the performance of the class in 1944–1945 and concluded the battlecruiser had no place in the postwar USN.<ref>Frank R Uhlig, Jr. 'The New Battle Cruisers', in Proceedings, USN Institute, vol 75, no 1, January 1949, pp 33–37</ref> For a time, the US Navy planned to convert the ship into the United States's first guided missile cruiser, but this did not come to fruition. A conversion to a large command ship was later contemplated and planning went far enough that money was allocated in the 1952 budget for this purpose. However, with one command ship already completed, Template:USS, and a second already chosen, Template:USS, no work was started upon Hawaii. Having been laid up for twelve years, the still incomplete ship was towed to breakers to be scrapped in 1959.

Design and description

Template:Main The initial impetus for the design of the Alaska class came from the commerce-raiding abilities of German and Japanese ships; the three Template:Sclasss, the two Template:Sclasss and Japan's large force of both heavy and light cruisers. By the time that they were built, their role had expanded to protect carrier groups. It was thought that the class's bigger guns, greater size and higher speed would give them a marked advantage in this role over heavy cruisers and they would also provide insurance against reports that Japan was building "super cruisers" more powerful than American cruisers limited by the London Naval Treaty.<ref group=A>Japan actually developed plans for two of the "super cruisers" in 1941—the Design B-65 cruisers—mostly in response to the new Alaska ships. They were never ordered due to the greater need for carriers.</ref>

Hawaii was Template:Convert long overall and had a beam of Template:Convert and a draft of Template:Convert. She displaced Template:Convert as designed and up to Template:Convert at deep load. The ship was powered by four General Electric geared steam turbine sets, each driving one propeller and eight oil-fired Babcock & Wilcox boilers rated at Template:Convert and a top speed of Template:Convert. The ship had a cruising range of Template:Convert at a speed of Template:Convert.<ref name=G122>Gardiner & Chesneau, p. 122</ref><ref>Egan, p. 36</ref> She carried four floatplanes, housed in two hangars,<ref>Garzke & Dulin, p. 182</ref> with a pair of aircraft catapults mounted amidships.<ref>Friedman, p. 303</ref>

The ship was armed with a main battery of nine 12 inch (305 mm) L/50 Mark 8 guns in three triple-gun turrets, two in a superfiring pair forward and one aft of the superstructure.<ref group=A>L/50 refers to the length of the gun in terms of calibers. An L/50 gun is 50 times long as it is in bore diameter.</ref> The secondary battery consisted of twelve 5-inch (127 mm) L/38 dual-purpose guns in six twin turrets. Two were placed on the centerline superfiring over the main battery turrets, fore and aft; the remaining four turrets were placed on the corners of the superstructure. The light anti-aircraft battery consisted of 56 quad-mounted [[Bofors 40 mm Automatic Gun L/60|Template:Convert Bofors]] guns and 34 single-mounted [[Oerlikon 20 mm cannon|Template:Convert Oerlikon]] guns.<ref name=G122/> A pair of Mk 34 gun directors aided gunlaying for the main battery, while two Mk 37 directors controlled the 5-inch guns and a Mk 57 director aided the 40 mm guns.<ref>Friedman, p. 483</ref> The main armored belt was Template:Convert thick, while the gun turrets had Template:Convert thick faces. The main armored deck was Template:Convert thick.<ref name=G122/>

Construction, conversion proposals and eventual fate

Along with the five Template:Sclasss and the final three Alaska-class cruisers, the construction of Hawaii was suspended in May 1942 before work began. This freed materials and facilities so that they could be used to build additional ships which could be completed faster and were needed in the war zones, like anti-submarine escorts.<ref name="1940 program">"USS Hawaii (CB-3); 1940 program – never completed"</ref> Over Template:Convert of steel plates and shapes which had been destined for Hawaii was redirected to other ships in July 1942.<ref name="G&D"/> However, Hawaii was added back onto the construction queue on 25 May 1943, unlike CB-4 through CB-6, which were cancelled on 24 June 1943.<ref>Whitley, p. 278</ref> Her keel was laid on 20 December 1943,<ref name="G&D"/> and she was finally launched on 3 November 1945, about two years after Guam.<ref group=A>Garzke and Dulin, p. 184 give a launching date of 11 March 1945, but an official U.S. Navy photograph, along with HawaiiTemplate:'s DANFS entry and Gardiner and Cheasneau, p. 122, appear to directly disprove this.</ref> The ship was sponsored by Mary P. Farrington, the wife of the delegate from the Territory of Hawaii to the United States House of Representatives, Joseph Farrington.<ref name="Hawaii DANFS">"Hawaii" in DANFS</ref> After her launch, little, if any, work was done before construction was halted in either February or April 1947<ref group=A>"USS Hawaii (CB-3); 1940 program – never completed" gives 17 February; Garzke and Dulin, p. 184 gives 16 April.</ref> due to the reduction in defense expenditures after World War II;<ref name="Hawaii DANFS"/> the ship was 82.4% complete when work was halted.<ref name="1940 program"/> The turrets for the main battery had been fitted and the superstructure was mostly finished,<ref name="G&D"/> although the former were removed when the ship was moved into the reserve fleet at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard.<ref name="1940 program"/>

Aircraft carrier conversion

Hawaii was considered under project SCB 26 for a conversion to an aircraft carrier, with an aircraft crane and twin aircraft catapults to be added on the stern of the ship. The conversion, as envisioned, would have looked similar to a completed Template:Sclass.<ref name=Scarpaci20>Scarpaci, p. 20</ref> The ship would have also been able to launch the JB-2 "Loon" cruise missile from a hydraulic catapult installed on her forward flight deck. The conversion was authorized in the same year (1948) and was scheduled to be completed in 1950; the ship's classification was changed to CBG-3 to reflect the planned overhaul. However, the conversion was canceled in 1949, along with any other plans for surface ships equipped with ballistic missiles, due to the volatility of the rocket fuels and the shortcomings with guidance systems that were available.<ref name=Scarpaci19/>

Guided-missile cruiser designs

Similar to the unfinished battleship Template:USS,<ref group="A">This similar proposal planned to take Kentucky, an incomplete Iowa-class battleship whose construction had also been halted, and convert her into the first guided-missile battleship (BBG). However, this conversion never materialized and Kentucky was scrapped in 1958.</ref> Hawaii was considered for a conversion to be a test platform for the development of guided missiles in September 1946. Designated CB(SW), the cruisers' gun armament would have consisted of sixteen 3-inch (76 mm) L70 guns in eight dual mounts. Most missiles would have been mounted toward the bow, while two "missile launching pits" would be located near the stern. For this task, no armor would have been needed and previously installed armor was to be taken off the ship when required.<ref name="G&D"/> These plans never came to fruition, so Hawaii remained in the Reserve Fleet, still incomplete.<ref name="Hawaii DANFS"/>

Two years later, in 1948, a similar conversion plan was put forth. This plan, designated project SCB 26A, proposed that Hawaii be converted into a Ballistic Guided Missile Ship. This plan called for Hawaii to be completed with 12 vertical launchers for U.S.-made V-2 short-range ballistic missiles and 6 launchers for the SSM-N-2 Triton surface-to-surface cruise missile.<ref name=Scarpaci19>Scarpaci, p. 19</ref> Triton was an attempt to give the Navy a reliable cruise missile that it could launch off of its ships. The design process began with an approval from the U.S. Navy in September 1946. After "formulating performance objectives and possible design baselines", the designers settled on attempting to fit a Template:Convert ramjet-powered cruiser missile onto solid-fuel rocket boosters that could carry the missile Template:Convert at Mach 1.6–2.5 in 1950. After lowering the ambitious goals to more realistic levels in 1955, a fully operational version was expected by 1965, but with tests for the SSM-N-9/RGM-15 Regulus II planned for that year and the up-and-coming UGM-27 Polaris submarine-launched cruise missile, the project was terminated in 1957.<ref>Parsch, "SSM-N-2"</ref> One source has a variation of this scheme, with the developmental XPM (Experimental Prototype Missile) from Operation Bumblebee replacing the Triton launchers. XPM eventually led to the RIM-8 Talos surface-to-air missile.<ref>Friedman, pp. 374–377</ref>

Large command ship

Hawaii being towed to the breakers

Yet another conversion of Hawaii, this time to a "large command ship", was contemplated under project SCB 83 from August 1951.<ref name="G&D">Garzke and Dulin, p. 184</ref> In this role, she would have been similar to Template:USS, but larger. This conversion would have boasted expansive flag facilities and fully capable radar and communication systems for commanding carrier task forces, though there would have been no facilities for amphibious operations.<ref name="G&D"/><ref name=Scarpaci20/> Armament would have consisted of sixteen 5-inch/54-caliber Mark 42 guns in single mounts;<ref name=Scarpaci20/> this gun size was specified because 3-inch/50-caliber guns were believed to be too light.<ref name="G&D"/> Two radars would have been mounted: an AN/SPS-2 on top of a forward tower and an AN/SPS-8 on the aft superstructure.<ref name=Scarpaci20/> In addition, an SC-2 was to be mounted on top of a short tower aft of the stack (though forward of the SPS-8); this would have been used for "tropospheric scatter communications".<ref name=Scarpaci20/>

Two Mk37/25 fire-control directors were planned, both fore and aft of the superstructure.<ref name=Scarpaci20/> The conversion plans were authorized,<ref name="G&D"/> and her classification was changed to CBC-1 to reflect this on 26 February 1952.<ref name="Hawaii DANFS"/> Money to begin the project was included in the 1952 budget,<ref>Garzke & Dulin, p. 189</ref> but the only work done on the ship was the removal of the 12" turrets,<ref name=Scarpaci20/> as it was intended that experience from Northampton should be analyzed before a full conversion.<ref name=Breyer253>Breyer, p. 253</ref> However, when it was seen that a smaller and cheaper ship—like the light carrier Template:USS—could do the same duty,<ref name=Breyer253/> the Hawaii project was cancelled in 1953.<ref name=Scarpaci20/> She reverted to her original designation of CB-3 on 9 September 1954.<ref name="G&D"/><ref>Breyer, pp. 251, 253</ref><ref group=A>The Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships notes this date as 9 October 1954.</ref>

Polaris study

In February 1957, a study entitled "Polaris Study–CB-3" was published, proposing that Hawaii be stripped of all her guns in favor of twenty Polaris missiles, mounted in the hull vertically in roughly the same location as the third main turret would have been located, two Talos surface-to-air missile (SAM) launchers, one each fore and aft, two Tartar SAMs mounted on either side of the superstructure and a single ASROC anti-submarine weapon mounted where the second main turret would have been placed. Nothing further was done with the study.<ref>Friedman, pp. 400–401</ref>

Disposal

On 9 June 1958, Hawaii was struck from the Naval Vessel Register<ref name="G&D"/><ref name="Hawaii DANFS"/><ref name=Breyer251>Breyer, p. 251</ref> and the ship was sold to the Boston Metals Company of Baltimore on 15 April 1959. The still-incomplete Hawaii was towed to Baltimore, arriving there on 6 January 1960 and was subsequently broken up for scrap.<ref name=Breyer251/><ref name=Whitley279>Whitley, p. 279</ref>

Sources

• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite DANFS
• Template:Cite web
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite web
• Template:Cite book

External links

• Navy photographs of Hawaii (CB-3) Template:Webarchive