Vero - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 in baseball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete; closing old discussion; article was timely reacreated. Renata 08:48, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

2006 in baseball

Placeholder for the future--no content, and probably won't have any anytime soon. Wikipedia is not a fortune teller. Seems like this energy would be better directed at completing 2003 in baseball, etc. Niteowlneils 19:12, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Agreed. While I do think some in-progress/predicted things deserve articles, this would set an awful precedent: people could create dozens or hundreds of "future" articles just to raise their edit counts. Starblind 20:32, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Premature. 23skidoo 21:31, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No content. Serves no useful function to readers or other contributors. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:19, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Maybe next year. Carrp 23:30, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Oh well, better luck next year! --Deathphoenix 03:07, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a fortune teller. Megan1967 03:59, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete this vapor. Wyss 07:19, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Abstain - there must be some major player contracts, contracts with stadiums or so on that definitely come due in 2006, having bearing on machinations in the sport now. However, this article now has nothing at all. Samaritan 10:02, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.