Vero - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Freedman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

If they are the Regius Professor of Astronomy anywhere, they changed their name to do it. Nonsense about someone non-notable... the only page linking here is October 28, which describes them as the creator of onecer, for which see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Onecer. Shimgray 15:24, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)

  • Andy Lawrence seems to be the real thing. Maybe we could just move the page (and ungarble it)? --rbrwr± 15:30, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
    • Move w/o redirect, or just create a new page & delete this one? There's nothing worth keeping that isn't just lifted straight from the ROE site (where I almost got a job a year ago, come to think of it). Shimgray 15:25, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
      • I'm not sure. I don't really mind. The redirect that would be created by a move doesn't seem to fit into the cases for speedy deletion of redirects, though it should - it would be the redirect equivalent of patent nonsense, in a sense. In fact this article as it stands is very nearly patent nonsense; I would argue that it's only saved from being speedied by the fact that it can be moved. Hmmm... --rbrwr± 16:57, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete Andy Freedman as unverifiable. If Andy Lawrence is notable enough for an article, just start over. A cautionary note, though. I can not find evidence that he is more than "an average professor" - one of the recommended tests at Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion of biographies. Rossami (talk) 00:36, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
    • I suspect delete and leave is the best solution. My suspicion is that he's notable enough (but then I'm an astronomer, or at least came close, and may be prejudiced) - we have precedent for trying to list every holder of a professorship at Cambridge, albeit a lot of redlinks (go! read it! marvel at the wacky Cantabrian titles!), and a Regius Professorship at .ed is likely of sufficient notability. That said, I can't actually think of anything in particular to write about him, hence suggesting we just leave it... Wikipedia won't suffer from not having a page on the guy who gets the second google hit for his own name, at least until someone who knows the topic well enough turns up. Anyway, I think we're all agreed on getting rid of Andy Freedman? (I cleared him off the October 28 page) Shimgray 02:13, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)