Vero - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Resynchronization

Great Resynchronization

Hugely unnotable, not any chance of becoming so. It could be merged into some Star Wars article, but I doubt it's even notable enough for that. Smoddy | Talk 23:02, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Delete (speedily) (William M. Connolley 23:03, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC))
• Delete This event was the basis of the Empire's calendar, their year 0, like our calendar uses the birth of Christ. Might warrant a mention in one of the other Star Wars articles, but absolutely does NOT need an article of its own. Starblind 23:55, Jan 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I don't know enough about Star Wars to say whether or not it merits inclusion in a more generic article (In total I've seen about 5 minutes of one of the films), but its not worthy of a whole article to itself. -Thryduulf 00:50, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and merge with some other relevant Star Wars article. 23skidoo 01:24, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- DCEdwards1966 01:39, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge, anything useable to Star Wars, then add redirect. Megan1967 04:05, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete this Skywalker cruft. Wyss 04:44, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: This was speedy deleted at 01:20, 11 Jan 2005 by Rmhermen. Megan1967's "merge" vote establishes that the speedy delete was not non-controversial. Further, I do not believe it met the strict criteria for speedy deletion. Temporarily restored in order to allow the VfD vote to continue. No vote. Rossami (talk) 00:16, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Rossami was quite correct to do this. Rmhermen 16:41, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
  • I wholeheartedly agree. Good call, Rossami. People seem to be awful quick on the trigger with their speedies lately, not sure why. VfDs are cheap and don't hurt anyone. Starblind 17:45, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)