Vero - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilith (comics)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect. Rossami (talk) 04:42, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nothing links to this disambiguation page, and no user would ever think of typing the name "Lilith (comics)" on their own. Instead, the "Lilith" page points to the "Lilith (disambiguation)" page, which is has many more sense, including the two comics sense listed in this page. So this page is redundant. Nyh 10:50, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I agree. Useless and redundant. --InShaneee 20:53, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep.There were links that pointed there, but I fixed them some time ago. Better to keep this than to have an editor link here and then end up creating a redundant article. -Sean Curtin 01:43, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)
- I don't understand your comment. Why would any editor create, out of the blue, a link to "Lilith (comics)", when going to Lilith shows that the disambiguation is Lilith (disambiguation)? If you're worried about this "Lilith (comics)" being created again at some point (I still don't see why not), a redirect can solve this problem. I still think that a page with no incoming links and redundant content is, well, redundant and can be deleted. Nyh 08:16, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- It's entirely possible that someone editing a comics article will use the disambiguator of (comics) here, not knowing that what they're looking for is at a more specific title. That said, redirecting to Lilith (disambiguation) is probably a better solution than keeping this. -Sean Curtin 03:50, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)
- I don't understand your comment. Why would any editor create, out of the blue, a link to "Lilith (comics)", when going to Lilith shows that the disambiguation is Lilith (disambiguation)? If you're worried about this "Lilith (comics)" being created again at some point (I still don't see why not), a redirect can solve this problem. I still think that a page with no incoming links and redundant content is, well, redundant and can be deleted. Nyh 08:16, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Lilith (disambiguation). Rmhermen 17:32, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Lilith (disambiguation). Megan1967 01:49, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.