Vero - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spread Firefox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was - redirected

Spread Firefox

Website promo. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:23, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. Excellent cause, but Wikipedia is not the vehicle for promoting it.--Ianb 06:10, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotions, and the campaign is not significant enough to warrant an article. Falcon 06:18, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete and Redirect. It now has a brief mention on the Mozilla Firefox article. The redirect will discourage re-creation. Norm^talk 20:38, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, not relevant for wikipedia. Thue | talk 11:03, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Merge with Mozilla Firefox. --81.178.101.155 14:06, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Sorry, the merge request by an IP address was me. --Spe88 14:19, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)

• Merge as users may see the term "spread firefox" on websites and wonder what it is all about. It isn't redundant, but this isn't a huge branch of Firefox, just a quick blurb about it on the Mozilla Firefox page will do. --Will2k 17:08, Sep 28, 2004 (UTC)
• Merge/redirect to Mozilla Firefox. — Gwalla | Talk 19:02, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Merge/Redirect to Mozilla Firefox. — El Chico! ^Talk 19:32, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Merge with Mozilla Firefox, preferably in a Marketing section or something. The recent Firefox marketing push is sadly absent from that article. BTW, use Firefox. User:Rparle/smiley —Rory ☺ 19:56, Sep 28, 2004 (UTC)
• Merge with Mozilla Firefox. Nadavspi 00:10, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. As much as I like mozilla, and have been involved in their project in the past, I don't think this is encyclopedic. --Improv 12:09, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Non encyclopedic article. Transient in nature.
• Delete. This is an encyclopaedia not a marketing tool. Ever found Microsoft Word promotions in Encyclopaedia Brittanica?
• Merge/Redirect A single sentence in the Mozilla Firefox article is all that is really necessary. Certainly doesn't warrant a whole article in my opinion.Bobbis 21:09, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Merge/Redirect I've been convinced.IcycleMort 14:32, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect -- J3ff 22:14, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Taco Deposit | Talk-o Deposit 22:53, Oct 2, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-encyclopedic marketing campaign, does not deserve an article of its own. Replace with a mention of the campaign in the Firefox article, where it is relevant. (By the way, have you tried Firefox yet?) -- The Anome 22:56, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Keep or Merge --Aaron Einstein 02:53, Oct 3, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete promotion piece. -- Cyrius|✎ 00:37, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.