Independent Baptist
Template:Short description Template:Use dmy dates
Independent Baptist churches (also called Independent Fundamental Baptists or IFB) are Christian congregations that generally hold to fundamentalist or conservative views of Evangelical Christianity and Baptist beliefs, such as believer's baptism, individual soul liberty and the priesthood of all believers.
The term “independent” refers to the doctrinal position of church autonomy and a refusal to join any affiliated Baptist denominations or non-Baptist association, though they usually maintain some sort of fellowship with like-minded churches. As Fundamentalists, these churches are strongly opposed to the ecumenical movement.
Around 3% of the United States adult population belongs to the Independent Baptist movement, half of whom live in the Southern United States.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
History
Template:FurtherThe modern Independent Baptist movement began in the early 20th century among local Baptist congregations whose members were concerned about the advancement of modernism or theological liberalism into national Baptist denominations in the United States.<ref name="Marsden 1980, pp. 55–62, 118-23">Marsden (1980), pp. 55–62, 118–23.</ref><ref>W. Glenn Jonas Jr., The Baptist River, Mercer University Press, USA, 2008, p. 96</ref> In response to the concerns, some local Baptist churches separated from their former denominations and re-established their congregations as independent churches. In other cases, the more conservative members of existing churches withdrew from their local congregations and established new independent Baptist churches.<ref>Template:Cite bookTemplate:Page needed</ref> However, earlier churches such as the Metropolitan Tabernacle led by Charles Spurgeon (1834 – 1892) have been also associated with Independent Baptists, as they separated from the British Baptist Union to become a self standing church due to holding more conservative beliefs than the Union.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
.jpg){kind=link}
The World Baptist Fellowship (originally the Premillennial Missionary Baptist Fellowship) is a fundamentalist Independent Baptist organization founded by J. Frank Norris (1877-1952) in Fort Worth, Texas in 1933 based on the idea of a fellowship consisting of independent, premillennial Baptist churches. This was done to combat what he saw as the "modernist" influences within the Southern Baptist Convention. After however a graduate of his seminary, John Birch was shot by Chinese Communists, he began very strongly to preach against Communist influences in the United States, and later urged the United States president Harry Truman to recognize the state of Israel. Later however, major divisions were created within his organization in 1950, leading to a rival group of Independent Baptists led by Beauchamp Vick in Springfield, Missouri.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Other Independent Baptist organizations that were founded include the General Association of Regular Baptist Churches in 1932 (became independent in 1934), which separated from the Northern Baptist Convention, the Baptist Bible Fellowship International in 1950, the Southwide Baptist Fellowship in 1956, the Fundamental Baptist Fellowship International in 1967, the Independent Baptist Fellowship International in 1984, and the Independent Baptist Fellowship of North America in 1990. Various independent Baptist Bible colleges were also founded.<ref>William H. Brackney, Historical Dictionary of the Baptists, Scarecrow Press, USA, 2009, p. 297</ref><ref>William H. Brackney, Historical Dictionary of the Baptists, Scarecrow Press, USA, 2009, p. 623</ref><ref>Robert E. Johnson, A Global Introduction to Baptist Churches, Cambridge University Press, UK, 2010, p. 357</ref><ref>William H. Brackney, Congregation and Campus: Baptists in Higher Education, Mercer University Press, USA, 2008, p. 376</ref> Such organizations were also born outside the United States, notably the Association of Fundamental Baptist Churches in the Philippines.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
In 1934, the major Independent newspaper Sword of the Lord was funded by John R. Rice, who edited the publication until his death on December 29, 1980. At first it was simply the four-page paper of Fundamentalist (later, Galilean) Baptist Church of Dallas, where Rice was the pastor. The paper was handed out on the street, and Rice's daughters and other Sunday school children delivered it door-to-door.<ref>Fred Barlow, "A Brief Biography of Dr. John R. Rice: Giant of Evangelism," Sword of the Lord (September 22, 2006), 14.</ref> The chief editor of newspaper after Rice's death became Curtis Hutson,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> which has been highly controversial among Independent Baptists, as he held to a Free Grace view of salvation, believing that repentance is simply a synonym for belief in Christ. Some Independent Baptists believe that Curtis Hutson changed the original stances of the newspaper held by John R. Rice, while the current chief editor Shelton Smith argued that John R. Rice did not disagree with the soteriological views of Curtis Hutson.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
In 1959, Jack Hyles became the pastor of First Baptist Church of Hammond, which became the largest Independent Baptist church of the 20th century. When he arrived, the church had a membership of about seven hundred, many from affluent backgrounds. About a third of the members left the church after hearing Hyles' preaching style, which was very different from that to which they had been accustomed. Hyles then led the church to its status as an independent Baptist church—freeing it from its ties with the American Baptists. Hyles started his bus ministry and soon shepherded the church from a congregation of several hundred to more than 20,000. In the early 1990s a national survey ranked First Baptist as the largest church in the nation, by average weekly attendance figures.<ref name="Chalfant">Chalfant, H. Paul, Religion in Contemporary Society (3rd Edition), Itasca, Illinois: F.E. Peacock Publishers (1994); pp. 363–364.</ref><ref name="BJH">Falsani, Cathleen. "Brother Jack Hyles of Hammond dies at 74" Chicago Sun Times, February 8, 2001.</ref>
Within the 21st century, some Independent Baptists voices have noticed a shift within some younger Independent Baptists, particularly in their approach to separatism and their approach to theology.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Paul Chappell notes that especially Independent Baptists from the Generation Y tend to emphasize theological knowledge and avoid the more rigid forms of the doctrine of separation.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Although at the same time, the very radical New Independent Fundamental Baptist (New IFB) movement emerged out of the Independent Baptist movement, founded by Steven Anderson, who gained prominence online. However, mainstream Independent Baptist leaders have criticized the New IFB for its doctrinal positions, many of which are rejected by the broader Independent Baptist community today.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Beliefs
Denominational beliefs are strictly Baptist. As Christian fundamentalists, they believe in the inspiration and inerrancy of the Bible, and great emphasis is also placed on a literal-historical interpretation of scripture. Other common beliefs include separation of church and state, young Earth creationism, cessationism, and dispensationalism,<ref>Bill J. Leonard, Jill Y. Crainshaw, Encyclopedia of Religious Controversies in the United States, Volume 1, ABC-CLIO, USA, 2013, p. 387</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>W. Glenn Jonas Jr., The Baptist River: Essays on Many Tributaries of a Diverse Tradition, Mercer University Press, USA, 2008, p. 125: "Independents assert that the Bible is a unified document containing consistent propositional truths. They accept the supernatural elements of the Bible, affirm that it is infallible in every area of reality, and contend that it is to be interpreted literally in the vast majority of cases. Ultimately, they hold not merely to the inerrancy of Scripture, but to the infallibility of their interpretation of Scripture. The doctrine of premillennialism serves as a case in point. Early on in the movement, Independents embraced premillennialism as the only acceptable eschatological view. The BBU made the doctrine a test of fellowship. When Norris formed his Premillennial Missionary Baptist Fellowship (1933), he made premillennialism a requirement for membership. He held this doctrine to be the only acceptable biblical position, charging conventionism with being postmillennial in orientation."</ref> and opposition to theological liberalism, ecumenism, Catholicism, the Charismatic movement, the ordination of women pastors, homosexuality, and evolution.<ref>Bill J. Leonard, Baptists in America, Columbia University Press, USA, 2005, p. 115</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Fundamentalism
As Christian Fundamentalists, Independent Baptists are opposed both to Liberal Christianity and Neo-Evangelicalism (which is particularly associated with Billy Graham). Independent Baptists believe that Neo-Evangelicalism errs by failing to practice separation sufficiently, rejecting its perceived Ecumenical attitudes in some modern Evangelical circles.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
King James Onlyism
Many Independent Baptist churches adhere to only using the King James Version of the Bible, a position known as “King James Onlyism”.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Bill J. Leonard, Baptists in America, Columbia University Press, USA, 2005, p. 141</ref> The Independent Baptist David Cloud, drawing on the arguments of Edward Hills, asserts that the King James Version should not be viewed simply as a translation of the Greek and Hebrew texts. Instead, he regards it as an independent edition of the Textus Receptus itself, rendered in English rather than Greek, and providentially preserved as the purest form of the Textus Receptus.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> The King James Only position was also advocated by notable Independent Baptist pastors such as Jack Hyles and Lester Roloff, who maintained that the King James Bible has perfectly preserved the Word of God.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Similarly, Jack Chick, who was best known for his comic tracts, also advocated a King James Only position.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> A more extreme form of King James Onlyism was developed by Peter Ruckman, who argued that the KJV constitutes "new revelation" or “advanced revelation” and superior to the original Greek and Hebrew manuscripts.Template:Sfn However, some Independent Baptists like John R. Rice, Curtis Hutson, Lee Roberson, R. L. Hymers Jr., and others took a more moderate position in arguing that although the King James Bible is preferable to most modern translations because of its manuscript tradition, it is not inspired and should not be considered perfect.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref name=":2" />
Independent Baptists who tolerate newer versions accept that there are disagreements on textual issues but feel that the most important issue is what the KJV translators themselves fought for, that the common man should have the Bible in his common language.<ref name=":2">DBTS Statement Template:Webarchive on Bible translation issues, November 1996</ref><ref name="NASV">"[http://www.wholesomewords.org/resources/fbfbjunasv.html FBF, BJU and the NASV" by Stephen Ross, October 2001, published on Wholesome Words website (accessed October 13, 2007)</ref><ref>A 2001 article in Way of Life Literature's Fundamental Baptist Information Service, "Fundamental Baptist Fellowship Committed to Modern Versions Template:Webarchive", characterized Bob Jones University, DBTS, and Central Baptist Theological Seminary as having "turned their guns on the defenders of the KJV." However, an April 2001 review Template:Webarchive by Dr. Thomas M. Strouse, also published by the Way of Life Literature's Fundamental Baptist Information Service , of the article "The Preservation of Scripture", by William W. Combs of DBTS, describes the Combs article as "a significant service for fundamental Baptists in the arena of bibliology" that "has enunciated once and for all the bibliological watershed for fundamentalists: what does the Bible attest to its own preservation?"</ref><ref>Pastor's Comments Template:Webarchive on "The Importance of Bible Preservation" and "Would-Be Pastors Attempt To Change Churches from the King James Bible", by Pastor D. A. Waite, Th.D., Ph.D., naming DBTS as one of "four leading Fundamentalist schools" that "either deny or re-define Bible preservation." March 13 and May 1, 2005.</ref><ref>The Dean Burgon Society website Template:Webarchive (accessed October 18, 2007), names DBTS as one of seven fundamentalist institutions accused of propagating "distortions on Bible versions."</ref>
Among Independent Baptist institutions which rejects King James Onlyism is Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary. The institution treats the original manuscripts of the Bible as the inerrant Word of God,<ref>DBTS Statement Template:Webarchive on Bible translation issues, November 1996</ref> a position that places it in opposition to the King-James-Only Movement. King-James-Only adherents have criticized DBTS (together with Bob Jones University and other institutions, including Central Baptist Theological Seminary) for playing an influential role in convincing some Independent Baptist groups to adopt modern Bible translations.<ref name="NASV2">"FBF, BJU and the NASV" by Stephen Ross, October 2001, published on Wholesome Words website (accessed October 13, 2007)</ref><ref>A 2001 article in Way of Life Literature's Fundamental Baptist Information Service, "Fundamental Baptist Fellowship Committed to Modern Versions Template:Webarchive", characterized Bob Jones University, DBTS, and Central Baptist Theological Seminary as having "turned their guns on the defenders of the KJV." However, an April 2001 review Template:Webarchive by Dr. Thomas M. Strouse, also published by the Way of Life Literature's Fundamental Baptist Information Service , of the article "The Preservation of Scripture", by William W. Combs of DBTS, describes the Combs article as "a significant service for fundamental Baptists in the arena of bibliology" that "has enunciated once and for all the bibliological watershed for fundamentalists: what does the Bible attest to its own preservation?"</ref><ref>Pastor's Comments Template:Webarchive on "The Importance of Bible Preservation" and "Would-Be Pastors Attempt To Change Churches from the King James Bible", by Pastor D. A. Waite, Th.D., Ph.D., naming DBTS as one of "four leading Fundamentalist schools" that "either deny or re-define Bible preservation." March 13 and May 1, 2005.</ref><ref>The Dean Burgon Society website Template:Webarchive (accessed October 18, 2007), names DBTS as one of seven fundamentalist institutions accused of propagating "distortions on Bible versions."</ref>
Soteriology
Soteriologically, Independent Baptists overwhelmingly believe in salvation by grace through faith alone and eternal security, but they may differ slightly from each other on other positions. Some align with Free Grace theology, such as Jack Hyles,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Curtis Hutson,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Ernest Pickering,<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Shelton Smith,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> and Peter Ruckman.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Others, including R. L. Hymers Jr.<ref name="apostasy">Template:Cite book</ref> and David Cloud,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> believe true repentance is abandoning sins and that salvation changes how a person lives, however, they reject requiring a lost sinner to make Jesus Christ “Lord” of their entire life. There are also some Independent Baptists who espouse Lordship salvation and a few may even embrace moderate Calvinistic views.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Independent Baptists often emphasize the distinction between law and gospel, a concept famously illustrated in Lester Roloff's sermon, "Dr. Law and Dr. Grace." In this sermon, Roloff described the law as revealing humanity's sins and exposing their inability to attain righteousness through their own works. This understanding, he explained, serves to guide individuals toward grace, where they can find forgiveness and redemption.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Most Independent Baptists strongly believe that the literal shedding of blood on the cross was a central part of Christ's atoning work, rejecting the view that the Biblical references to blood are intended as metaphors for death and instead emphasize the literal and physical aspect. Many also teach that after his resurrection, Jesus presented his blood on the heavenly mercy seat, often considering the literal blood of Christ as the object of faith for salvation in the New Testament.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref name=":0">Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> A few such as R. L. Hymers, Jr have stated that when preaching the gospel, one needs to include both the death of Jesus and the blood of Jesus.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> This position is in direct contrast to the position mostly associated with Robert Thieme (1918 – 2009), who rejected the bleeding of Christ as a part of the propitiation, and John F. MacArthur has also stated similar views.<ref name=":0" />Template:Rp Independent Baptists such as Hymers Jr. have emphasized that due to the unity of the person of Christ in his two natures, the blood of Jesus can also be called the blood of God.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Some Independent Baptists adhere to the Sinner's prayer, which is a prayer of confession to God by an unbeliever who has the desire to be saved, and they see reciting such a prayer as the moment defining one's salvation. However, others such as David Cloud have criticized the sinner's prayer as leading to inauthentic conversions and calling it “quick prayerism”.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> The claim that prayer is necessary to be saved was also critiqued by Jack Hyles in a sermon named 'Fundamentalist Heresy'.<ref>Audio Sermons - Fundamentalist Heresy | Jack Hyles Preaching</ref>
Independent Baptists tend to reject atonement theories such as the governmental theory and the moral influence theory, but instead believe that Jesus' substitutionary bloody death paid the penalty of sin.<ref name=":0" />Template:Rp
Doctrine of separation
Template:FurtherIndependent Baptists usually believe that members of a church should be separate from worldliness or “the world” and not have association with those who are “of the world” (unbelievers),<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> however, different Independent Baptists vary in what to them constitutes separation in specific areas.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Additionally, there is a distinction between first and second degree separation. Independent Baptists want to live in a way that is distinct from the typical lifestyle of the world (first degree). Some would claim that not only should one separate from the world, but also from those Christians who will not separate themselves from the world (second degree), and believe that Christians who are tied up with the things of “the world” are themselves guilty of apostasy for their failure to adequately separate. The more rigid second degree separation was opposed by John R. Rice and Curtis Hutson, however it was affirmed by Jack Hyles.<ref>Curtis Hutson, What Is Secondary Separation, 1983</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Among Independent Baptists, Paul Chappell has also warned of being "hyper-separated", arguing that separation and collaboration needs to be taken with a balance.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
A few Independent Baptists believe in the more rigid so-called "third degree separation", which is the belief that one needs to separate from fellow Independent Baptists who do not practice secondary separation.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Ecclesiology
Many Independent Baptists adhere to some form of "Baptist successionism" (or Baptist perpetuity), the belief that Baptists trace their origins through a lineage of Christians dating back to the Apostles with medieval groups cited as pre-Reformation representatives of Baptist principles.<ref name=":0" /> Thus, as a consequence Independendent Baptists tend to view themselves as distinct from Protestantism.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Some proponents of Baptist successionism take this further by embracing Landmarkism or "Baptist bride theology", the view that only Baptist churches constitute the body or bride of Christ and that only Baptists will be raptured and partake in the marriage supper of the Lamb. They also claim that the Baptist Church began with John the Baptist or Jesus himself. However, this perspective is not universally accepted within the Independent Baptist movement and has been criticized for denying the universal body of Christ comprising all true believers.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Independent Baptists reject the ordination of women pastors and deacons in a local New Testament church according to the Apostle Paul's writings in 1 Timothy 2, Titus, and 1 Corinthians 14.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Many Independent Baptists believe that according to 1 Timothy 3:2 and Titus 1:6-7 a pastor cannot be divorced, however, some reject this interpretation.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Peter Ruckman argued that being "blameless" has nothing to do with divorce because he believed that a pastor can be remarried to one wife and that the Apostle Paul is mainly addressing polygamy in those passages.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Baptist churches that adhere to fundamentalism often call themselves “Independent Baptist Church", "Bible Baptist Church", or "Fundamental Baptist Church" to demonstrate their membership in the movement.<ref>William H. Brackney, Historical Dictionary of the Baptists, Scarecrow Press, USA, 2009, p. 234-235</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Worship music
Most Independent Baptist churches exclusively use traditional worship during their services, however, there are some that have a mixture of traditional and contemporary worship styles. Many Independent Baptists such as Jack Hyles, Jack Chick, Paul Chappell, David Cloud, Ernest Pickering, and Spencer Smith have criticized and rejected the use of contemporary Christian music.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Such leaders argue that styles such as rock and pop music are overly emotional, entertainment-focused, and man-centered, making them unsuitable for use in services. According to them, biblical principles should guide Christians to use hymns rather than CCM, which they feel lacks the reverence and theological depth appropriate for worship.<ref>THE KIND OF MUSIC THAT HONORS GOD by Ernest D. Pickering, Th. D.</ref>
Views on alcohol
Template:Further Independent Baptists hold that the Bible forbids partaking of alcohol (wine) altogether and argue that some alleged alcoholic drinks in the Bible are only medicinal uses of alcohol. They also argue that wine in the Bible can also refer to non-alcoholic beverages such as unfermented grape juice, and for this reason the context must determine which meaning is required. In passages where beverages are viewed negatively, Independent Baptists understand them to mean fermented wine, and where they are viewed positively, they understand them to mean unfermented wine.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> According to this view, they believe that the wine in the Last Supper could not have been fermented, because they believe that the fermentation of wine is similar to the fermentation of bread through yeast, which they view as a symbol of sin. Thus Independent Baptists have argued that such wine cannot symbolize the blood of Christ.<ref name=":3">Landmarks of Baptist Doctrine, 1989, Robert J. Sargent.</ref>Template:Rp<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Other issues
Most Independent Baptists adhere to a pre-tribulation view of the rapture,<ref name=":1">Bill J. Leonard, Baptists in America, Columbia University Press, USA, 2005, p. 115</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> although a minority subscribe to mid-tribulation or post-tribulation interpretations.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref> The movement encompasses a range of theological and ideological perspectives, with notable variation on issues such as Calvinism,<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> expressions of patriotism,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> belief in certain conspiracy theories, dispensational salvation,<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> interpretations of biblical accounts involving giants, and details on the relationships between the persons of the trinity, such as the classical trinitarian doctrine of the eternal generation of the Son,<ref name=":0" /><ref>Template:Cite web</ref> among other views
Regarding creation, Independent Baptists typically align with either Young Earth Creationism<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> or Gap Creationism, a form of Old Earth Creationism that accommodates an ancient universe while maintaining a literal reading of Genesis.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>XVIIa.1. The Young Earth Theory or Philosophy Exposed, Part 1, Max D. Younce, Heritage Baptist Bible Church</ref> While the majority reject modern flat Earth beliefs,<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> a very small subset affirms geocentric creationism that retains a spherical Earth but places it at the center of the cosmos.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Testimony of Gerardus Dingeman Bouw, The Association for Biblical Astronomy</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
In terms of Christology, Independent Baptists tend to uphold orthodox theological positions and affirm the historic condemnations of heresies such as Monophysitism, Nestorianism, Apollinarianism, and Monothelitism.<ref>Cambron, Marck (1954). Bible Doctrines: Beliefs That Matter. p. 69-70.</ref> Nevertheless, a few within the movement have questioned whether Monothelitism should be classified as heretical.<ref name=":3" />Template:Rp
Relationships to other Christians
Validity of Baptisms
Independent Baptists are generally divided into two main groups: Open Baptists and Closed Baptists. Open Baptists accept baptisms performed by any Christian group, provided the baptism was conducted by immersion and administered to a professing believer. In contrast, Closed Baptists recognize only baptisms conducted within Baptist churches as valid. While the open view is more widespread in modern times, Landmarkist Independent Baptists continue to reject non-Baptist baptisms as illegitimate, even if done by immersion.<ref name=":0" />Template:Rp
Non-Denominationalism
Ernest Pickering (1928–2000), a prominent Independent Baptist author, voiced concern over the trend among some Baptists to abandon their denominational identity in favor of a nondenominational label. Although he acknowledged that many sincere Christians exist outside Fundamentalist Baptist circles and personally rejected Landmarkist theology, Pickering warned that discarding the Baptist name often indicates a drift away from core Baptist convictions. He argued that such moves undermine unity among Baptist, fundamentalist, and separatist churches and open the door to ecumenical compromises. Pickering urged Baptists to preserve their distinct identity in order to maintain their theological and ecclesiastical integrity.<ref>Should We Abandon the Name “Baptist”? By Ernest D. Pickering, Th.D.</ref>
Thiemism
Independent Baptists are highly opposed to the doctrines and the movement of Robert Thieme (1918 – 2009), and have called for the necessity of separation from Robert Thieme's teaching, particularly due to his teachings on issues such as the atonement which Independent Baptists view as major issues.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
New Independent Fundamental Baptists
Independent Baptists such as David Cloud have been highly critical of the New Independent Fundamental Baptist movement started by Steven Anderson, viewing it as heretical. Cloud has argued that their views such as that Jesus paid for sins by burning in hell and that homosexuals cannot be saved are in error, associating their imprecatory prayers for people such as Obama to be cultic.<ref name=":12">Template:Cite book</ref>
Southern Baptists
Many influential Independent Baptists originally separated from the Southern Baptist convention, especially due to different convictions on the topic of separation, Bible versions and ecclesiology. Many in the IFB movement have been critical of the more centralized governance of the Southern Baptist Convention, instead preferring fully Independent church structure. Particularly differentiating Independent Baptists today from the Southern Baptists is the distinction between Fundamentalism and Neo-Evangelicalism, as although both espouse Conservative views, they differ on the topic of separation.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref> However, some Independent Baptists still wish to maintain close ties to the Southern Baptist convention.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Social, moral and cultural issues
Entertainment
Independent Baptists are sometimes skeptical of things such as television and professional sports, believing that modern entertainment is often too "wordly". Nevertheless, some Independent Baptists are more lenient on entertainment, which has drawn criticism from other Independent Baptist writers such as David W Cloud, who believes that they have fallen into allowing wordliness in the name of joy.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Euthanasia
Independent Baptists believe Euthanasia to be sinful, believing it to contradict the command to not kill. They believe that euthanasia takes away opportunities from people to be saved by believing in the blood of Christ or earn rewards, which God has given them.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Sexuality
Independent Baptists believe that homosexuality is sinful. They believe that marriage is only biblically allowed between one man and woman, that sexual relations outside marriage are sinful, and often believe that a person's sexual orientation can be changed.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> However, they believe that homosexuals can be saved still by the atonement of Jesus Christ.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> In distinction, the New Independent Fundamental Baptist movement created by Steven Anderson differs from this view, believing that homosexuals cannot be saved and should be subject to capital punishment.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Sexual abuse
In 2018, an investigation by the Fort Worth Star-Telegram identified 412 abuse allegations in 187 independent fundamental Baptist (IFB) churches and institutions across the United States and Canada, with some cases reaching as far back as the 1970s.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Rick Pidcock, The horror of Let Us Prey may not be as far from home as you think, baptistnews.com, USA, November 30, 2023</ref> In November 2023, Investigation Discovery released Let Us Prey: A Ministry of Scandals, a 4 part documentary, highlighting sexual abuse and cover up within the Independent Baptist movement.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
Independent Baptist authors have responded to sexual abuse scandals in various ways. Shelton Smith (who is the current editor of the newspaper Sword of the Lord) has argued that while Independent Baptists need to take allegations seriously, he has still expressed scepticism on the cases of cover up happening in large scale within the Independent Baptist movement.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Some Independent Baptists such as David Cloud have instead reacted to these allegations by arguing that they are only common in certain segments of the Independent Baptist movement. David Cloud in response stated that other Independent Baptists already attempted to deal with these cases in the 1980s and 1990s.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> To this, the Independent Baptist author Paul Chappell also made a statement that Independent Baptists need to have an increased compassion for those who have been victims of abuse, and critiqued those Independent Baptist who did not want to openly discuss the issue, although he rejected the claim that those cases of abuse characterize a majority of the movement.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Notable individuals associated with Independent Baptists
- Ben M. Bogard (1868 – 1951)
- John Roach Straton (1875 – 1929)
- J. Frank Norris (1877 – 1952)
- Mordecai Ham (1877 – 1961)
- John R. Rice (1895 – 1980)
- Robert T. Ketcham (1889 – 1978)
- George Beauchamp Vick (1901–1975)
- David Otis Fuller (1903 – 1988)
- Lee Roberson (1909 – 2007)
- Lester Roloff (1914 – 1982)
- Oliver B. Greene (1915 – 1976)
- George W. Dollar (1917–2006)
- John Birch (1918 – 1945)
- Peter Ruckman (1921 – 2016)
- Robert Sumner (1922 – 2016)
- Maze Jackson (1923–1996)
- Jack Chick (1924 – 2016)
- Jack Hyles (1926 – 2001)
- John A. Stormer (1928 – 2018)
- Ernest Pickering (1928 – 2000)
- Rolland D. McCune (1934 – 2019)
- Curtis Hutson (1934 – 1995)
- Gérard Dagon (1936 – 2011)
- R. L. Hymers Jr. (born 1941)
- Shelton Smith (born 1942)
- Michael Pearl (born 1945)
- Gerardus D. Bouw (1945-2023)
- Clarence Sexton (1948 – 2023)
- Chuck Baldwin (born 1952)
- Kent Hovind (born 1953)
- Paul Chappell (born 1962)
- Gary Click (born 1965)Template:Div col end
See also
- American Baptist Association
- Association of Independent Methodists
- Baptist International Missions, Inc.
- Baptist Missionary Association of America
- IFCA International
- Landmarkism
- List of Independent Baptist higher education institutions
- Southwide Baptist Fellowship
References
Bibliography
- Timothy Gloege, Guaranteed Pure: The Moody Bible Institute, Business, and the Making of Modern Evangelicalism (2015).
- Barry Hankins, God's Rascal: J. Frank Norris & the Beginnings of Southern Fundamentalism (1996).
- Andrew Himes, The Sword of the Lord: The Roots of Fundamentalism in an American Family (2011).
- George M. Marsden, Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth Century Evangelicalism, 1870–1925 (1980).
- Robert F. Martin, Hero of the Heartland: Billy Sunday and the Transformation of American Society, 1862–1935 (2002).
- Template:Citation
- Daniel K. Williams, God's Own Party: The Making of the Christian Right (2010).
External links
Template:US baptist denominations Template:Evangelicalism in the United States