Vero - Wikipedia:Naming conventions (chemistry)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Wikipedia subcat guideline Template:MOSCHEM Template:Naming conventions

General rule

From Wikipedia:Naming conventions: Template:Quote

Organic compound names

{{#invoke:Shortcut|main}} Trivial names (non-systematic, or "common" names) are favored for use in titles of articles for organic compounds instead of systematic names. Trivial names are usually different from the preferred name following IUPAC nomenclature. For compounds lacking trivial names, as is often the case for complex structures, substitutive nomenclature or other systematic names may be used. The general rule is to use the name most commonly used to refer to the compound, as evidenced by use in reliable sources (in line with WP:COMMONNAME).

Classes of compounds may have more specific guidance on naming, such as the use of international nonproprietary names for pharmaceutical compounds (see WP:NCMED and below).

Examples of use of trivial names and not systematic names include:

Template:Xt not Template:!xt
Template:Xt not Template:!xt
Template:Xt not Template:!xt
Template:Xt not Template:!xt
Template:Xt not Template:!xt
Template:Xt not Template:!xt
Template:Xt not Template:!xt

Systematic and other accepted names for the compound not used as the article title should instead be redirects tagged with the Template:Tl template and listed in the chembox as other names, with especially significant alternative names mentioned in the lede in bold font.

The periodic table

{{#invoke:Shortcut|main}}

Groups

Note that "group" has a chemical meaning and "column" has the tabular meaning.
  • Alternatively, they may be named by their first element, e.g. "Template:Xt" for group 13.<ref name="redbook"/> (But per below, avoid Template:!xt for Template:Xt as ambiguous.)
  • In the 1–18 scheme, f-block groups are unnumbered. There is no widely-agreed system of numbering these groups in the literature, so one should not be used.
Avoid labeling these groups as Template:!xt (for not applicable?, or not available i.e. "not found yet"?). Best is to leave this group number blank. Provide textual description when needed. This also applies to any (theoretical) g-block groups.
To refer to such a group (column), list the elements explicitly, e.g. Template:Xt. Do not name by first element (Template:!xt). The reasons for this are that many of the expected first-element names have other meanings as rare earth separation groups (see "Non-column groups" below), and that referring to individual f-block groups in the literature is rare (so it's better to be explicit).
  • Hydrogen belongs to Template:Xt (not Template:!xt or Template:!xt), and helium belongs to Template:Xt (not Template:!xt).<ref name=Fluck/><ref name=2021IUPAC/>
  • "halogen" and "noble gas" are used to refer to the entirety of groups 17 and 18, per a 2016 IUPAC report about naming new elements<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> Some sources focusing on superheavy elements may not consider tennessine (Ts) to be a halogen, or oganesson (Og) to be a noble gas, as their predicted chemistry is generally supposed to be quite different from those of their lighter congeners. Such more limited usage should be explained before its first occurrence.
  • A few groups have IUPAC-approved names, called trivial name, that may also be used:
Template:Xt = group 1 except hydrogen
Template:Xt = group 2
Template:Xt = group 13
Template:Xt = group 14
Template:Xt = group 15 (earlier Template:!xt)
Template:Xt = group 16
Template:Xt = group 17
Template:Xt = group 18
  • Template:Xt (group 13), Template:Xt (group 14) and Template:!xt (group 15) have been previously recommended by IUPAC (in 1970), and the former two are still used by them, though they are not in the most recent Red Book. Avoid rarer synonyms like Template:!xt (group 13) and Template:!xt (group 14).
  • Avoid Template:!xt for Template:Xt, since "metal used for making coins" (see coinage metal) contains also metals outside of group 11, and roentgenium in group 11 is (for obvious reasons) not used for coins.
  • The group numberings with Roman numbers and "A" and "B" suffixes (like Template:!xt, Template:!xt) should not be used, as they are outdated and ambiguous. For example, in the CAS scheme "Template:!xt" denotes Template:Xt (Template:Xt), while in the old IUPAC scheme it denotes Template:Xt (Template:Xt). If they are used at all, context should clarify (disambiguate) into the 1–18 numbering. Care should be taken when translating old sources that use this nomenclature to modern terminology.
  • Some sets of groups have names:
    • The Template:Xt are the elements of groups 1, 2, and 13–18 (i.e. the s-block and p-block).<ref name=principles>Template:Cite book</ref>
    • The Template:Xt are the elements of groups 3–12 (i.e. the d-block) – this in particular includes group 12 (although some sources do not include it).<ref name=principles/>
    • The Template:Xt are f-block elements.<ref name=redbook/>

The scandium group (group 3)

{{#invoke:Shortcut|main}}

  • The scandium group should by default be treated as containing Template:Xt. Template:!xt, which in some sources take the positions of lutetium and lawrencium (especially in older sources), should not be in group 3. Care should be taken when employing sources that mention "group 3" or "group IIIB" or "group IIIA", since they may not always use this arrangement.
This group 3 set is established per the 1988 IUPAC report<ref name=Fluck/> and per a subsequent 2021 provisional report by a IUPAC project dedicated to this constitution question<ref name="2021IUPAC">Template:Cite journal</ref>
In fact, the old classification was based on erroneous early measurements of electron configurations,<ref name="Jensen1982">Template:Cite journal</ref> and was already criticised as "incorrect" by Lev Landau and Evgeny Lifshitz in 1948.<ref name=Landau>Template:Cite book</ref> The IUPAC report convention is accepted by most chemists and physicists considering the subject.<ref name="Jensen2015">Template:Cite journal</ref><ref name=mustdie>Template:Cite journal</ref>
Note that the so-called "IUPAC(-published) periodic table" is not actually approved by IUPAC.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> It leaves the spaces below yttrium blank, and there is significant confusion among (and within) sources on whether that includes the lanthanides and actinides in group 3 or not;<ref>It is not very clear how the 15 element cells for La–Lu are meant to fit below the one cell for Y. See for example Template:Cite journal, which both suggests that there is a hole in period 6 and group 3 in this form, and that all the trivalent rare earths fit there. These cannot simultaneously be true. In the 1990 IUPAC Red Book and a 2009 Chemistry International article by G. J. Leigh, this "blank below Y" table in 18-column is expanded to a 32-column table with Lu below Y. If this is the intention, it seems better to make it clear by putting Lu there in the 18-column form as well, as drawn in the 2021 report and a 2019 Chemistry International article by E. R. Scerri, and as described in the 1988 report.</ref> hence this form is also best avoided.

Non-column groups

  • In case of commonly named "groups" that are not a column, such as Platinum group or Iron group, care should be taken that no confusion remains with column-wise periodic table group.

18 vs 32 columns

The 18-column format used on Wikipedia; see below for the 32-column format that is also used
  • The periodic table can be displayed in either 18- or 32-column format, with the 32-column format as in Fig. 4 of the aforementioned 2021 IUPAC report. The forms present the same scientific statement and should be consistent with each other. The 18-column format cuts out the f-block rows, containing the elements lanthanum (La) through ytterbium (Yb) and actinium (Ac) through nobelium (No), and places them at the bottom of the table.<ref name=Fluck/> Asterisks should be placed between groups 2 and 3 to indicate the theoretical position of these cut-out rows.
Note that these f-block rows do not equal the lanthanides/lanthanoids (La–Lu) and actinides/actinoids (Ac–Lr) which commonly extend to include lutetium and lawrencium.
  • Other structures, e.g. the Janet left-step or the 8-group form, should only be used when specifically illustrating such alternative periodic tables.

Template:Periodic table (32 columns, compact)

Blocks

At this English wiki, the preferred presentation coloring scheme of the elements is by blocks (s, p, d, or f).

The colours to be used are given in Template:Tlx:

This template also gives colours for the higher orbitals:

Categorising elements

Categorisation is an attempt to classify all elements into one overall scheme, with each element in exactly one category (as opposed to listing non-completifying sets like coinage metals). A general classification is not achieved in sources (let alone without WP:NPOV and WP:OR). Such categorisation then is not to be used in general (for example, not as a general coloring of the periodic table).

A general colouring by metallicity is discouraged, because there are WP:NPOV and WP:NOR concerns: the borders of some categories can differ drastically between sources (e.g. metalloids), and there is no set of categories that are mutually exclusive and yet cover the entire periodic table (e.g. astatine is quite likely to be both a metal and a halogen). However, such coloring may be used to base and illustrate dedicated topics (such as in sections of metalloids). Individual, well-established "metallicity" categories, e.g. transition metal, post-transition metal, metalloid, rare earth metals etc., can be referred to without "all elements all once" colouring.

When a specific categorisation scheme is relevant (e.g. Template:Tlx), a periodic table-filling categorisation can be applied.

Element names

{{#invoke:Shortcut|main}} Traditionally, the names of three elements have been spelled differently in different parts of the English-speaking world. For articles about chemistry-related topics, Wikipedia follows the spellings recommended by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC):<ref name="bluebook">Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="redbook">Template:RedBookRef</ref>

Template:Xt not Template:!xt
Template:Xt not Template:!xt
Template:Xt not Template:!xt

These spellings should be used in all chemistry-related articles on English Wikipedia, even if they conflict with the national spelling variety otherwise used in the article.

This convention should also be applied to all compounds and derivative names of these chemicals: Template:Xt not Template:!xt; Template:Xt not Template:!xt; etc., e.g. caesium sulfide.

The English name of element 74 is Template:Xt and not Template:!xt: the latter was once adopted by IUPAC (in 1949), but is no longer recommended by them (even as an alternative) per the 2011 Principles. (Of course, the symbol is still W, and the name "wolfram" may be referred to when explaining why that is the case, or when quoting text in languages that use that name.) Similarly for derivatives (per the 2005 Red Book), use Template:Xt, Template:Xt, Template:Xt and not Template:!xt, Template:!xt, Template:!xt. (And similarly avoid the old names Template:!xt and Template:!xt for element 86 outside historical contexts; there is a real confusion even in today's literature between radon meaning the element Rn and radon meaning the isotope 222Rn, but the way to solve that is by explicitly clarifying what is meant, not resurrecting archaic terms that have fallen out of use and may not be generally understood.)

Elements that have not been given trivial names by IUPAC may be referred to either by IUPAC systematic element names and symbols, or by atomic numbers. So Template:Xt and Template:Xt are both correct, and symbols Template:Xt, Template:Xt, Template:Xt may all be used in text. However, for natural disambiguation, the article titles should be at the systematic names.

When new elements are recognised, Template:!xt change the names and symbols to those proposed by the discoverers until the public comment period expires and IUPAC makes the final announcement! (The symbol has changed between the initial proposal and the final recommendation before, in the case of copernicium: originally proposed as Cp, but became Cn.)

Isotopes

{{#invoke:Shortcut|main}}

  • It is permissible to use the atomic number rather than the symbol in contexts about history when anachronism is to be avoided, e.g. "Template:Xt" (because at that point those elements had not yet been named). But this should be avoided outside talking about history. Avoid using the systematic element names in such contexts even when talking about history, because they are not supposed to be used once the element actually has a trivial name. For isotopes of undiscovered elements, either systematic names (e.g. Template:Xt) or atomic numbers (e.g. Template:Xt) are acceptable for the symbols, but only the systematic names can be used for the full names (e.g. Template:Xt, not Template:!xt which nobody uses).

Theoretical elements

{{#invoke:Shortcut|main}} Elements with atomic number Template:Nowrap are theoretical elements: They have not been discovered (synthesized). Regarding public-page creation and content (reader-visible pages, such as article, category, template):

  • Element page: Articles pages, by systematic name, exist for E119 up to E184: Ununennium (Element 119).
These are either full articles (like Ununennium) or redirects (like Unbitrium, 58 redirects). This serves readers searching for these element names.
  • Redirect element articles like Unbitrium (Element 123) R:
Per WP:notability and WP:Reliable sources, these articles can and may only be created with content when substantial information is available.
These can and may only be created (1) when the base element article exists by content, and (2) when substantial new information like papers is available. These secondary pages may not be created as redirect.

To compare: Disovered element Oganesson (E118) has its article, plus all five secondary articles; none is a redirect.

Template:As of: Effectively this means that currently public-page creation, by content or redirect, is not permitted nor needed. See also documentation at Template:Slink.

Capitalization of elements and compounds

{{#invoke:Shortcut|main}} The names of elements and other chemicals should be written without abbreviations and treated as common nouns. They do not have special capitalization or italic formatting (see MOS:CAPS and MOS:ITALIC) regardless of the origin of the name unless appropriate for the start of a sentence or part of a title. The symbols for elements should always be capitalized.

Use: Template:Xt
Avoid: Template:!xt
Avoid: Template:!xt
Avoid: Template:!xt

Prefixes that are such as sec-, tert-, ortho-, meta-, para-, α-, β-, D-, L-, (+)-, (−)-, (R)-, (S)- and the numerical prefixes are not considered part of the name: they each follow their own capitalization and italics rules, and it is instead the first letter of the main part of the name that is treated as the "first letter" of the name to be capitalized where appropriate. Exceptions are cyclo, iso, neo, and spiro which are considered part of the name and therefore not italicized or hyphenated. Substituent groups are also considered part of the name.

In former versions of the IUPAC recommendations, names were written with a capital initial letter. This practice has been abandoned in later publications.<ref name=PIN>Preferred IUPAC Names Provisional Recommendation, September 2004; Chapter 1, par. 16 Name writing, p.80-90</ref> IUPAC policy differentiate proper names from things named after proper names. This rule (full name uncapitalized but symbol capitalized) applies also to isotopes and nuclides, when completely written out: thus 14C but carbon-14.

Prefixes in titles

Template:Anchor {{#invoke:Shortcut|main}} When the chosen article title starts with a prefix including positional identifiers (ortho-, meta-, para-, N-, O-, α-, β-, γ-, etc.), isomeric identifiers (sec-, tert-, etc.), stereochemical identifiers (cis-, trans-, (E)-, (Z)-, etc.), chiral identifiers ((R)-, (S)-, D-, L-, (+)-, (−)-, etc.), or numbers, the first letter after the prefix in the name should be capitalized: hence titlecase Template:Xt not Template:!xt. A redirect from the uncapitalized version should be created to simplify linking from other articles.

Non-numerical prefixes are italicized and uncapitalized in titles (Template:Xt, for example). Both numerical and non-numerical prefixes are followed by a hyphen. The template Template:Tl is used to display titles which start with lowercase letters or include italics.

Note that cyclo, iso, neo, and spiro are considered part of a chemical name (such as Template:Xt) and not considered prefixes. No hyphens or italics are used in these cases.

Article titles for compounds and related topics should reflect how the compound name is commonly written and use Greek letter prefixes if appropriate, e.g. Template:Xt, using Template:Tl to display as Template:Xt, not Template:!xt and displaying as Template:!xt. In the article page name (article location) it is important to use the uppercase Greek letter, even though it can be easily confused with uppercase Latin letters in many cases, so that DISPLAYTITLE (or alternatively, Template:Tl) will work properly. It is also essential to ensure redirects exist for all possible typed variations of the compound name so searchers can easily reach the appropriate article.

Use of Stock nomenclature

Stock nomenclature for inorganic compounds is based on the indication of the oxidation number (as a roman numeral, in parentheses) of each of the major elements in the compound, e.g. iron(III) chloride. It is widely, if sometimes incorrectly, used on Wikipedia for the titles of articles about inorganic compounds. It is not obligatory, as there are other acceptable methods for naming these compounds, but it is often preferred as the most common non-ambiguous name for a substance. The following guidelines are based on current WikiBestPractice:

  1. Only the cationic element (i.e. the element whose name appears unchanged in the compound name) is assigned its oxidation number. Except in rare cases (none at present), we do not assign the oxidation number in the anion: hence Template:Xt not Template:!xt, Template:Xt not Template:!xt.
  2. There is no space between the end of the element name and the opening parenthesis: hence Template:Xt not Template:!xt. Note that this is an exception to the usual English style for parentheses.
  3. It is not necessary to specify the oxidation number when there is no possibility of ambiguity in the compound title: hence Template:Xt not Template:!xt.
  4. Stock nomenclature should be used for predominantly ionic compounds. Compounds with a substantial degree of covalency should be named by stoichiometric nomenclature: hence Template:Xt not Template:!xt. However, it should be noted that ionic vs. covalent (not to mention metallic and van der Waals bonding) is a continuum and that many such situations will require significant editorial judgement (e.g. mercury(II) chloride, which is in fact a molecular compound, or ruthenium(IV) oxide which exhibits metallic conductivity).

Names of oxyanions should in general follow the names in Table X of the IUPAC 2005 Red Book.<ref name=redbook/> Exceptions can be made if an alternate name is much more common in the literature, e.g. Template:Xt rather than Template:!xt (don't generalise this to radon though, as it would create an ambiguity between radon and radium).

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} Template:Dablink

Where a compound has a WHO international nonproprietary name (INN), this should be used as the article title (see WP:NCMED). Exceptions would be where the pharmaceutical use of a certain compound is secondary to other applications (commodity chemical, synthetic intermediate, etc., agriculture or industry).

Redirects

From Wikipedia:Deletion policy: "Don't worry, redirects are cheap."

Redirects should be created for:

  • Alternative names for the compound, including acronyms where appropriate;
  • Alternative capitalizations, where there is a numerical prefix in the article title;
  • Formulas of simple compounds; for example H2O → water.

Exceptions

Even with the best will in the world, no set of guidelines can cover every case. Some articles on Wikipedia have non-standard titles through consensus that this is the most commonly used name (in scientific circumstances) for the compound concerned, whatever IUPAC or the other rules suggest. For example:

Template:Xt not Template:!xt
Template:Xt not Template:!xt (and for substituted Template:Xt, Template:Xt, Template:Xt, and Template:Xt)
Template:Xt not Template:!xt
Template:Xt not Template:!xt
Template:Xt not Template:!xtTemplate:Efn

Please do not revert-war over the naming of an article: the best place for discussion is on the article's talk page or (failing that) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals.

Groups of compounds

{{#invoke:Shortcut|main}}

Organic compound classes and functional groups

For articles about classes of organic compounds, the singular class name from the IUPAC "Glossary of Class Names"<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref> is usually used, e.g. Template:Xt, Template:Xt, Template:Xt, Template:Xt, Template:Xt. Articles about functional groups should use the name most commonly used to refer to the group in reliable sources (generally, the name of the corresponding radical) followed by the word "group", e.g. Template:Xt, Template:Xt, Template:Xt, Template:Xt, Template:Xt, Template:Xt. In many cases, the compound or compound class and corresponding functional group are discussed in the same article, generally using the compound class as the article title with the name(s) of the functional group redirecting there (although the opposite is possible).

For groups of compounds named after a simple parent compound, articles about the group should be located at the plural of the parent compound name, e.g. Template:Xt, Template:Xt, Template:Xt, Template:Xt. Similarly, salts and esters of carboxylic acids should collectively be referred to by the plural of the carboxylate. In some cases, the group of compounds (e.g. Template:Xt), the functional group (e.g. Template:Xt), and the carboxylate (e.g. Template:Xt) will warrant a separate article; whether the article should be titled by the compound group, functional group, or carboxylate should be decided on a case by case basis depending on the group and how the article is constructed. Related terms not chosen as the title should be redirects and mentioned in the lede in bold font. In cases where the carboxylate is not generally considered as a functional group, the plural may either redirect to the article about the parent acid (or the carboxylate if there is a separate article about the carboxylate), or be a separate article or chemistry index that lists salts and esters of the parent acid (e.g. Template:Xt). Rare cases may have separate articles for the carboxylate, functional group, and group of compounds. Hatnotes should be used to link between these similarly named pages to facilitate navigation between these closely related topics.

Organometallic compounds

The general article about the organometallic chemistry of an element should be entitled "Organo[element] chemistry", e.g., organomercury chemistry, organopalladium chemistry, organozinc chemistry. The IUPAC definition of an "organometallic compound" includes boron, silicon, arsenic, and selenium, so this title guideline also applies to organoboron chemistry, organosilicon chemistry, etc.<ref>Template:GoldBookRef</ref> For consistency this is extended even to obvious nonmetals, e.g. organoxenon chemistry. The related pages "Organo[element] compound" and its plural should generally be redirects. Some flexibility can be used if the article is heavily weighted toward a specific topic, such as the case for organolithium reagent, so long as the other forms redirect there. In some cases, a broad-concept article regarding the organometallic chemistry of an element may not yet exist; in these cases it is adequate to redirect these terms to an appropriate section of another article. On the other hand, depending on the metallic element, it may well be appropriate to have additional articles covering specific compounds or groups of compounds, or specific reactions.

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Notes

Template:Notelist

General references


Retrieved from "https://wiki.sarg.dev/index.php?title=Vero_-_Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(chemistry)&oldid=515801"